USF Libraries
USF Digital Collections

Psychological consequences of radon in the home

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Psychological consequences of radon in the home
Series Title:
Quick response research report ;
Physical Description:
5 p. : ; 28 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
Gibbs, Margaret S
Belford, Susan
Edelstein, Michael R
University of Colorado, Boulder -- Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center
University of Colorado, Boulder -- Institute of Behavioral Science
Publisher:
Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado
Place of Publication:
Boulder, Colo
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Radon mitigation -- Psychological aspects -- New York (State) -- Orange County   ( lcsh )
Radon -- Psychological aspects   ( lcsh )
Genre:
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )

Notes

Additional Physical Form:
Also issued online as part of a joint project with the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute (FMHI) Research Library's disaster mental health initiative.
Statement of Responsibility:
Margaret Gibbs, Susan Belford, Michael Edelstein.
General Note:
Cover title.
General Note:
"Institute of Behavioral Science #6."

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of South Florida Library
Holding Location:
University of South Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 001985205
oclc - 39227610
usfldc doi - F57-00029
usfldc handle - f57.29
System ID:
SFS0001110:00001


This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam 2200301Ia 4500
controlfield tag 001 001985205
005 20090316161801.0
008 980604s1986 cou s000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a F57-00029
035
(OCoLC)39227610
040
DDB
c DDB
043
n-us-ny
086
UCB6/57.15/07
2 codocs
1 100
Gibbs, Margaret S.
0 245
Psychological consequences of radon in the home /
Margaret Gibbs, Susan Belford, Michael Edelstein.
260
Boulder, Colo. :
b Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado,
1986.
300
[5] p. ;
28 cm.
440
Quick response research report ;
v #07
500
Cover title.
"Institute of Behavioral Science #6."
530
Also issued online as part of a joint project with the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute (FMHI) Research Library's disaster mental health initiative.
650
Radon mitigation
z New York (State)
Orange County
x Psychological aspects.
Radon
Psychological aspects.
700
Belford, Susan.
Edelstein, Michael R.
710
University of Colorado, Boulder.
Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.
University of Colorado, Boulder.
Institute of Behavioral Science
773
t Natural Hazards Center Collection
TKR
ARL-FMHI
049
FHIM
994
C0
FHI
4 856
u http://digital.lib.usf.edu/?f57.29



PAGE 1

HAZARDHOUSECOP'(.... \ c."-w--s.f......::I: N ::c. 0c: (/)n'1 8

PAGE 2

NaturalHazardsResearchandApplications.InformationCenterCampusBox482UniversityofColoradoBoulder,Colorado80309-0482 PSYCHOLOGICALCONSEQUENCESOFRADONINTHEHOMEMargaretGibbsSusanBelfordMichaelEdelstein1986QuickResponseResearch Report#07This publication is partofthe Natural Hazards &Applications Information Center's ongoing QUIck Response Research Report Series. http://www.colorado.edu/hazardsInstituteofBehavioralScience #6 (303)492-6818

PAGE 3

Inline with thepurposeoftheBoulderworkshopindiscussingcommunicationofriskabouthazards,.thispaper will firstdiscusstheroleplayedbyasmallnonprofitenvironmentalagencyinconveyinginformationandassistancetothecommunityaboutradon.Thesecondpartofthepaper will reportbrieflyonpsychologicalfindingsrelatedtoradoninasamplefromthecommunity.Afterradon was foundinhighlevelsontheReadingPronginPennsylvania,communitiesinOrangeCountyinNewYork,alsosituatedontheProng,begantobecomeconcernedaboutpossibleradonlevelsin own community.TheseconcernsvereallayedformostOrangeCountyresidentsafterameetinginvhichscientistsfromtheNewYorkDepartmentofHealthandNYUspoke.Littleactualincidencedatawasreported,buttheimpressionvasgiventhattestsamplingintheareahadshovedverylowlevelsandthatradonitselfwasnotverydangerous.Forinstance,slideswereshownofattractiveAustrianwomeninaspasoughtoutforitshighradonlevel.OrangeEnvironment,asmall,strugglingnonprofitagency,decidedthatmoreextensiveradonsamplingshouldbeconductedinthearea,forthepurposeofassessingtheextentoftheproblem,mappingtheaffectedareas,andprovidingaffectedresidents with informationaboutdangersandmitigation.OrangeEnvironmentobtainedbatchratesfortestsfromamajorradontestingservice,andadvertisedthehalf-costservicestoresidentsthroughthelocalpaper.Resultsreportedinthis paper havebeenobtainedfromthissampleofindividualswhotestedtheirhomes.Findingsoftheradontestsindicatedthat ofthe120tests showed radonreadingsabovealevelof4picocuriesperliter,thelevelgenerallyacceptedasrequiringremediation.Therangeofreadingswasfromafractionofapicocurietoahighof60picocuries.Thus,althoughfindings were notattheveryhighlevelfoundinPennsylvania,OrangeCountyclearlyshowedasizableproportionofhomesthatneedremediation.Also,nospecialpatternofcorrelationbetweenreadingsandresidenceontheReadingProngappeared,meaningthatthereisabroaderneedtotestintheareathanpreviouslythought.Interestingly,thelocalnewspaperreportedthefindingsasshowinglittleproblem,andcontinuedtostatethattheradonproblemwaslimitedtotheReadingProng.Alongwiththetestresults,anexplanation ofthe meaningofradonlevelstakenfromadraftoftheEPA'sguidelines was enclosed.Inaddition,ameetingwasheldwith those testingtheirhomesat which remediationwasdiscussedby the staff of OrangeEnvironmentknowledgeableinthatarea,includingourenvironmentalphysicist.

PAGE 4

Individualsseemedtofindthismeetinghelpful.AnissueforanagencylikeOrangeEnvironmentiswhatroletoattempttoplayineducatingthepublicandencouragingactionaboutradon.SinceOrangeEnvironmentis small, madeupofafewinterestedvolunteers,andhasnofunding,itsresourcestoaccomplishtasksthatdonothavepublicsupportisverysmall.Inthefaceofmediaandgovernmentaldismissal,itiseasytoappeartobeaCassandra.Asanexample,oneortworespondentstoourpsychologicalquestionnaireobjectedtoitemsthataskediftheywereupsetorworriedaboutradon.Theysuggestedthatsuchquestionswerereactive,makingthemworrywhentherewasnoreasonto.Incontrasttoresponseaboutnaturally-occurringradon,thecommunityhasrecentlybeenmobilizedovertheissueofa-radondump,-i.e.,adumpofradium-contaminatedsoil,plannedforthearea.Thepublicoutcryhasbeenenormous,althoughthepotentialdangertothecommunityisprobablymuchlessthanfromthepre-existingradoninthearea.Onthisissue,OrangeEnvironmenthasbeenconsultedandaskedtotakeactionbymembersofthecommunity.Thisissueaffordsanopportunitytostudythedifferencebetweenperceptionsofnaturalandtechnologicalhazards;fromtheinformationsofaritappearsthattechnologicalhazardsevokesmoreanger,worry,generalizedstressandaction.ThepsychologicalstudyconductedontheparticipantsofOrangeEnvironment'sradontesting was madepossiblebythequickresponsefundingoftheNaturalHazardsResearchCenterinBoulder.Thestudyhypothesizedthatexposuretoradoninthehome,evenatthelevelsanticipatedintheOrangeCountyarea,wouldbestressfulandhaveemotionalconsequnces.Questionsaboutemotionalresponseswereincluded,aswellastheHorowitzImpactofEventScale.Questionsalsotappeddemographicvariables,perceptionsofriskaboutradonandotherenvironmentalhazardsandlocusofcontrolandsocialsupport.Nowthatsubjectshavereceivedtheirradonresults,wearejustbeginningtocollectdataontheirresponses.Thedatathatcanbeprovidedatthispointdealwiththeissueofbaserates.Oneoftheproblemsofstressresearchisthatofseparatingtheeffectsofstressfromthepre-existingpersonalitiesoftheindividualsinvolved.Thatis,skepticsaboutthenegativeeffectsofstressclaimthatvictimsofhazardaresometimesselfselected,andthatthoseindividuals who showemotionalreactionsarethosewithpre-existingpersonalitydeficits.Forinstance,itisarguedthatthoseveterans who comedownwithPTSDarethosewhohadpre-existingpersonalitydeficits,andthatindividualswhowenttoVietNamand those whosawcombatwerelessstablethanindividualswhomanagedtoavoidtheexperience, thug predisposingthemtopsychopathology.Theliteraturedoesnotsupporttheskeptics'interpretation,buttheargumentisnevertheless

PAGE 5

hardtodiscount.Thebasicdilemmaofhazardsresearchisthatpre-testmeasuresarenotavailableforthevictims.Thatis,wedon'tknowwhenorwheretheearthquake,thetoxicwatercrisis,ortheplanecrashisgoingtostrike.Inthisstudy,wedidhavebaseratedataavailable,andwecomparedthebaserateresponsesofourexperimentalgroupwiththoseof subjects.Wehadtwoexperimentalgroupsofindividualswhotestedtheirhomes.Eachfamilywasgiventwoquestionnaires;atotalof236werehandedout,and76werereturned.Thereturnratewasactallyhigherthantheapparent 32X assomepercentofthefamilieshadonlyoneadult,andallfamiliesweregiventwoquestionnaires.Comparisonoftheresponsesofthe two experimentalgroupsobtainEdnomoredifferencesthanwouldbeexpectedbychance.Thecontrolgroupchosen vas thatofmembersof two chaptersoftheLeagueofWomenVoters.Thisgroupwaschosenbecause we thoughtitwouldbecomparableineducationandenvironmentalawarenesstotheradontesters.Approximately120questionnairesweredistributed,and35werereturned,areturnrateof 29X. Comparisonoftheresponsesofthetwocontrolgroupsobtainednomore-differencesthanwouldbeexpectedbychance.Ourhypotheseswere,generallyspeaking,thattheexperimentalgroupwouldnotappeardifferentfromthecontrolgrouponanydimensionotherthanconcernaboutradon,thatis,thatpre-selectiononthebasisofemotionaladjustmentwouldnotoccurintheexperimentalgroup.Specifically,wehypothesizedthatintermsofsubjectiveadjustment,radontesterswouldresemblethecontrolgroupinhappiness,amountofworry,senseofcontrolovertheirenvironmentandtrustofothers,withtheonlydifferencehypothesizedtobeagreaterworryabouthealthandthehealthofanychildreninthefamilyforthosewhotestedtheirhomes.WealsohypothesizedthatscoresontheImpactofEventsScalewouldbecomparable,sincetheradontestersinthepretestdidnotknowwhattheirlevelsofradonwere.Wehypothesizedthatthemaindifferencebetweengroupswouldbeoneofattitude,thatthosewhochosetohavetheirhomestestedwouldperceiveenvironmentalhazards,especiallyradonexposure,asmoredangeroustosocietythancontrolsubjects.Demographicdifferencesbetweentheexperimentalandcontrolgroupsappeared.WewereofcourseawarethattheLeagueofWomenVoterssamplewasalmost female(32females,3males)whiletheradontesterssampleturnedouttobecomposedof27femalesand 4B males.Thegroupsalsodifferedsignificantlyonage(experimentals40.2,SD 9.6; controls50.4;SD=13.4,t= 4.44, P<.01>.Experimentalsweremorelikelytobemarried (96X vs. B3X, t=2.41,P<.05).Controlsweremorelikelytohavelivedintheirhomeslonger <12.9 years,SDB.7,vs.7.6

PAGE 6

years,SD 7.8; t .. 3.16,P<.01).Ontheimportantdimensionof education, however,thegroupsdidnotdiffer,withthemeanforbothgroups falling intothecategory between undergraduatedegreeandsomegraduatetraining.Inaddition,as will bepresentedlater,bothgroupshadsimilarattitudesaboutenvironmentalhazards.TableIsummarizesthedifferencesbetweentheexperimentalandcontrolgroups.Aspredicted,nodifferences were obtainedonthedimensionsofpastcontrol,anticipatedcontrol,happiness,worry,trustorsupportfromspouseandothers.Contrarytoprediction,there were alsonodifferences in worryabouthealthandhealthofchildren.Alsonotpredictedwasthenonsignificanttrendfortheradontestingsampletodescribethemselvesasmorecompetentthancontrolsubjects.OntheImpactofEvents Scale, thegroupsdidnotdiffer oneithertheavoidancefactor,theinstrusionfactor,ortotalscore. We testedourhypothesisthatradontesterswouldperceiveexvironmentalhazards,especiallyradon,asmoredangerousthanwouldcontrolsubjectsinthefollowingway. We comparedtheratingsofcontrolandexperimentalsubjectsontenenvironmentalhazards,suchaspesticides,nuclearpower,and cigarette smoke.Thedifferencewasnonsignificant,althoughexperimentalsubjectsdidratethehazardsasmoredangerous. When radonalonewasexamined,thedifferencebetweentheexperimentalgroupandcontrolgroupwassignificant.Ananalysisofcovariancewasperformed,totestwhether,separatingoutthefactorofsomewhathigheroverallratingofenvironmentalhazardbyexperimentalsubjects,theradonhazardalonewasstillperceivedasmoredangerous.Theanalysiswassignificant(F=7.3,P<.01,n=89),whilecomparingthegroupmeansonthecovariateofoverallperceptionofenvironmentalhazardstillshowedanonsignificantresult(t=.28,P=.78)Thedemographicdifferencesbetweenourexperimentalsandcontrolssuggesttheinclusionofanothercontrolgroupmorecomparableingenderandagecomposition.However,itisinterestingthatthetwogroups,contrarytoprediction,perceivedenvironmentalhazardsasequallydangerous.Insomeverybasicattitudinalrespects,ourexperimentalandcontrolgroupsareremarkablysimilar,andthesesimilaritiesofattitudemay,forthepurposesofthestudy,bemorecentralthanageandgender.Itwouldbeofinteresttocontrastourexperimentalgroupwithlesseducated,lowersocioeconomicstatusgroupsintermsofattitudesandsubjectivemental health variableshdidnotdifferentiatethetwogroups,andtheonlytrenddifferentiatingthetwowasforgreaterfeltcompetenceintheexperimentals.Thus,tosummarize,ifwedoeventuallyfindstressreactionsinourexperimentalgroup,ourdatasuggestthatthesereactionscannotbeattributedto

PAGE 7

pre-existingemotionaldifficulties.Obviously,moreext.ensiveint.erviewingandt.est.ingwouldbe.necessaryt.o = complet.elyruleout.pre-existingdifficultiesasafact.or, il but. t.he dat.aare more 801idt.han t.he dat.aobt.ainablein almost.allnat.uralisticst.ressst.udies.Ourdat.alIuggestt.hat.t.hedecisiont.ohaveone'shouset.est.edfor not.afunct.ionofbeingaworrywart.,oranunt.rust.ing.chumanbeing,but.rat.herasimplefunct.ionof percept.ionofradonasmoredangeroust.hanot.herpeople see it..Table1Quest.ionExperiment.alsCont.rols tt SO tt SOt.past.cont.rolover2.61.0.2.81.1.94Ufe-anticipat.edcont.ro12.61.12.81.2.72 :. happiness2.31.32.51.0.65 : worry4.11.74.61.8 1.38, about.healt.h3.41.73.91.71.42 worryt.rust.ofot.hers3.31.63.32.4.15 compet.ence2.00.82.41.21.73socialsupport.1.80.61.90.6.45support.fromspouse1.10,31.00.21.21-It.emsexcept.forlast.t.woarescaledinopposit.edirect.ion,sohigherscoreindicat.eslessofvariable