xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam a22 u 4500
controlfield tag 008 c20049999azu 000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E11-00422
Educational policy analysis archives.
n Vol. 12, no. 73 (December 26, 2004).
Tempe, Ariz. :
b Arizona State University ;
Tampa, Fla. :
University of South Florida.
c December 26, 2004
Balance between higher education autonomy and public quality assurance : development of the Portuguese system for teacher education accreditation / Brtolo Campos.
Arizona State University.
University of South Florida.
t Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA)
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
mods:mods xmlns:mods http:www.loc.govmodsv3 xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govmodsv3mods-3-1.xsd
mods:relatedItem type host
mods:identifier issn 1068-2341mods:part
mods:detail volume mods:number 12issue 73series Year mods:caption 20042004Month December12Day 2626mods:originInfo mods:dateIssued iso8601 2004-12-26
E DUCATION P OLICY A NALYSIS A RCHIVES A peer reviewed scholarly journal Editor: Gene V Glass College of Education Arizona State University Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the Education Policy Ana lysis Archives EPAA is a project of the Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Articles are indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (www.doaj.org). Volume 12 Number 73 December 26 2004 ISSN 1068 2341 T he B alance B etween H igher E ducation A utonomy a nd P ublic Q uality A ssurance: Development of the Portuguese S ystem for T eacher E ducation A ccreditation Brtolo Campos University of Porto (Portugal) Citation: Campos, B. (2004, December 26). The balance between higher education autonomy and public quality assurance: Development of the Portuguese system for teacher education accreditation. Ed ucation Policy Analysis Archives, 12(73). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n73/. Abstract The accreditation systems of higher education institutions and/or programmes are becoming a policy measure used to find a balance between their aut onomy and public assurance concerning the quality of the qualifications they award. This article analyses, from the point of view of this balance of power, the process of development of the P ortuguese accreditation system aimed at providing public assuranc e that initial teacher education programmes are more driven by social demand, namely by the changing school education needs. This was a political and cultural process rather than a merely rational and technical one. Thus the emergence of the need for, and possibility of, external pressure upon higher education institutions is related to the evolution of several social factors. On the other hand, the implementation of the accreditation system means a significant change for these institutions which implies ne w practices and comes into conflict with some of their values and with power sharing within and among them and with society. For these reasons a strategy of wide participation of significant stakeholders was deemed more suitable for the formulation, adopti on and implementation of this new public policy. The way in which
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 2 Government, the accreditation body and the significant stakeholders exercised their power in this process influenced the characteristics of the system, the rhythm of its implementation and t he abrupt governmental decision to put it on stand by, until now. The accreditation systems of higher education institutions and/or programmes are becoming a policy measure used to f ind a balance between the autonomy of these institutions and public assurance concerning the quality of the qualifications they award. This article (Note 1) analyses, from the point of view of this balance of power, the development of the P ortuguese system for the accreditation of initial school teacher education programmes ( Note2) It starts by making a short reference to the higher education accreditation movement e specially in the field of teacher education and by pinpointing the role of an accreditati on system within the process of public certification of qualified teacher status. The second section outlines the historical and social process leading to the social awareness that there was a social issue urging a new policy measure. T he third characteris es the structural and functional elements of the system developed The description of the strategy chosen for the formulation, adoption and implementation of this policy appears in the fourth section. Finally, the way social actors exerted their power in t he process of development of this policy is highlighted and some lessons are drawn from it. I Introduction 1. Higher education accreditation To have recourse to accreditation procedures for quality assurance and development of higher education institu tions and programmes is an Anglo Saxon tradition (Myers et al. 1998 ; V an Damme, 2000 ) that has been developed or at least seen and debated as an hypothesis in continental Europe since the eighties (Rhoades & Sporn, 2002 ) ; firstly in Central and Easter n Europe in the framework of political, economic and social changes driven by the fall of the Wall ( Westerheijden, 2001) and after wards all over Europe (Campbell & V an der Wende, 2000; CRE, 2001; Danish Evaluation Institute 2003; Hamalainen et al, 2001 ; V an der Wende & Westerheijden, 2001 ) mainly following the Bologna declaration in 1999 ( Reichert & Tauch, 2003 ; Sebkova, 2002 ) Moreover, as a recent OECD/CERI document (2003) summarises: during the last quarter of a ce ntury, ex ternal quality assurance an d accreditation systems have been establis hed in all regions of the world and have become full features of modern regulati on systems in higher education (p.10) H igher e ducation accreditation has also become part of the agenda of international organisa tions such as UNESCO (2002), the World Bank (El Khawwas et al, 1998 ) and OECD ( OECD 1999 ; OECD/CERI 2003 ) El Khawas (1998) i n the contribution of the World Bank to the UNESCO W orld Conference on Higher Education (1998), sees the world wide movement t owards new approaches to higher education quality assurance as emerging from the inadequacy of traditional academic controls: As governments in most parts of the world have considered their agenda for higher education over the last few decades, issues of quality assurance and quality enhancement have been a major focus of attention. Despite differences in the size and stage of development of their higher education sectors many
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 3 governments have decided that traditional academic controls are inadequate t o todays challenges and that more explicit assurances about quality are needed. Organisations such as the European Commission or OECD have reinforced this trend by their own calls for new structures and new approaches to quality assurance (p.2) M ass if ication and for profit provision on one hand, and internationalisation and delivery globalisation namely by e learning, on the other hand are the m ost frequent ly mentioned reasons for the recent interest in, and development of new instruments of highe r education quality assurance and accreditation all over the world However the chosen approaches differ from country to country (van Damme, 2000); for El Khawas (1998) this variation reflects political and cultural preferences within each country, d ifferences in government leadership, as well as varying stages of development for the higher education sector (p.4) Furthermore there is an increasing recognition that national quality assurance and accreditation systems are insufficient to address the recent explosion of higher education cross border provision (OCDE/CERI 2003 ; V an Damme, 2000 ). The most commonly mentioned models for the internationalisation of higher education quality assurance and accreditation mechanisms are (i) mutual recognition of the national systems, (ii) an umbrella organisation defining standards for and accrediting national systems and, finally, (iii) international agencies The first two generally are better accepted but all the three have already been implemented (CRE 2001; OCDE/CERI, 2003) There are two categories of higher education accreditation: academic and professional Each can refer to institutions or to programmes ( Hm linen et al ., 2001 ; Myers et al 1998 ) The academic accreditation of an institution or a pr ogramme leading to a certain academic degree consists of a judgement on its suitability to the criteria that characterise the degree in question and it is often related to the process of recognition of its national (or international) value. The professiona l accreditation of an institution or a programme which aims to provide a certain professional qualification consists of a judgement on its suitability to the demands of the professional activity they prepare for, and it is often related to the process of a warding a professional title and license to act as a professional. That is, whereas the professional accreditation focuses on the criteria concerning the level and field of a certain professional qualification, the academic accreditation is centred on cri teria characterising the education leading to the academic degree to be awarded. Suitability to academic criteria does not necessarily assure suitability to professional criteria; yet, whenever professional qualification programmes lead to an academic degr ee, matching the academic criteria is also considered necessary. Taken as whole, there are several features that, in international terms, characterise the process of accreditation and distinguish it from other processes: (i) the existence of a conclusive stat ement on the suitability of the institution or programme to predefined criteria; (ii) the definition of criteria is the responsibility of an instance external to the higher education institutions (iii) the existence of an accreditation body independent of the accredi ted institutions. And furthermore, in the case of professional accreditation:
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 4 (iv) the existence of criteria specific to the professional qualification level and field the programme is aimed at; and the participation of employers and professionals from t he sector in the setting out of such criteria and in the programme accreditation process. The accreditation system analysed in this article is a system of professional accreditation of programmes. 2. Q uality assurance of teaching qualifications Apart fro m the systems encompassing all higher education institutions and/or programmes, there is a lso a trend for developing programme specific professional accreditation systems (Myers et al., 1998 ; OECD, 2003). H ere awareness of consumer protection need (OECD/C ERI, 2003) is greater and the specific concern is the appropriateness of the qualifications to the demands of the socially expected professional role or the match [of] the output of institutions wit h the needs of modern workpl a ces in an increa singly compe titive and transformative economy (V an Damme, 2000, p.11) What matters is the fitness of purpose and not only the fitness for purpose judgement as Randall (2002) stresses. Th is is the case regarding teacher education institutions and prog rammes. I n s ome countries all over the world a ccreditation systems for initial or in service teacher education have been developed or are being proposed, as an instrument of teaching quality assurance policy ( Avalos, 2000; Buchberger et al., 2000 ; Campos, 2000b; European Commission, 2003 Hirsh et al., 2001; Moon, 2003; NCTAF, 1996 ;; Sander, 1999; Zafeirakou, 2002) Mostly in US, w here the recourse to this instrument started earlier, tea cher education accreditation is not only intensivly debated, as in other countr ies, but also the object of more research studies (Darling Hammond, 2000, 2002; Delandshere, G. & Petrosky, A., 2004; Roth, 1996; Wilson et al 2001 ) Professional a ccreditation of teacher education programmes aims first of all, to contribute to the solu tion of a key education policy issue: assuring society that people wishing to teach are properly qualified to respond to the demands of teaching in a satisfactory way That means, ensuring they hold the qualifications and competences needed for teaching, s o as to be awarded their respective professional title and teaching license. The most common solutions that public policies have called for to solve this issue are the following: (i) accreditation/recognition of teacher education programmes targeted at profes sional teaching qualifications; (ii) external individual certification of teaching qualification; (iii) both accreditation and certification. Sometimes, selection procedures for licensed teachers who apply for a teaching job constitute a complementary device for, or even an alternative strategy to, these solutions. It should be underlined that in the countries where most teachers are public employees, the State does not always clearly distinguish among its responsibilities regulating admittance to the teaching profession, assuring quality of public and private provision of school education (which includes concern with the quality of teachers) and recruiting teachers for state schools and only intervenes in the latter pr ocess. A situation of total social deregulation happens when there is no selection in recruitment to employment, no programme accreditation, and no external certification
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 5 awarding teaching licenses. This was the situation in Portugal until the setting up, in 1999, of the accreditation system for initial teacher education. Apart from the need to assure society about the quality of teachers qualifications, with the increasing internationalisation of higher education and the labour market another policy iss ue arises. Programme accreditation has been pointed out as an alternative solution to a new individual process of certification of teaching qualification by assuring that teaching qualification and the license to teach obtained by a person in one State are comparable to those obtained in the State where this person wishes to attend part of his/her higher education or be allowed to teach Public assurance at national level was largely responsible for the setting up in Portugal of the accreditation system of initial teacher education programmes for school education. However, the system is also relevant for the policies aimed at enhancing student mobility and teacher employability in the European and international education and employment space. 3 Entities i nterested in teacher education quality assurance So far, we have stressed the contribution of teacher education accreditation to the regulation by public authorities of the license to teach, where it exists (Darling Hammond, Wise & Klein, 1995) : professio nal programme accreditation, by itself or complemented with external certification of individual qualification s is a sufficient condition or a necessary one, as the case may be, for licensing graduates to teach in the country or countries where it is reco gnised for this purpose. However, there are other entities or users as Randall (2002) calls them, interested in the public assurance that accreditation provides of the suitability of teacher education programmes to the demands of future professional ac tivity. The Ministries of Education, responsible for school education policies and for their quality assurance, are no doubt in the top rank; and this is the case whether or not they are direct providers of school education. Teacher education institutions also have an interest in this process, both when dealing with the admittance of students who have started their studies in another institution, and for the sake of the social credibility accreditation may provide to teacher education at large, and to each accredited institution; besides, accreditation avoids competition with programmes that have less quality. Assurance provided by the accreditation system is also of interest for students applying for or attending teacher education programmes and for teach er employers namely those responsible for state schools whether or not they rely on specific selection procedures. It is also of interest for teachers themselves because of the public image of their own qualification and of the quality of their future col leagues qualifications in a school context where teamwork is a growing concern. Finally, it is of interest for the whole society, which holds a legitimate expectation that school education of all citizens is in the hands of well qualified teachers. II. Emergence Of The Need For Teacher Education Accreditation In Portugal The political importance attributed to the process of public recognition of teaching qualifications and the amount of attention paid to it in Portugal has varied over the
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 6 years The em ergence of the need for, and possibility of, external pressure upon higher education institutions providing these qualifications for its public quality assu rance is related to the evolution of several social factors This section analyses this evolution an d identifies factors responsible for the recent adoption of this specific recognition system which is accreditation ( Campos, 1996, 1999, 2000 a ; Formosinho 2002) Regarding the analysis of the recognition policies adopted in the latest forty years, we c an distinguish three periods that correspond to different overall goals for school education and to different roles the Ministry of Education has played in relation to teacher education (Table 1): Table 1 Evolution of the policies regarding the recogniti on of teaching qualifications (1960 2002) Period School education Teacher education responsibility Qualification recognition To the mid seventies Selective & elitist Ministry of Education Unnecessary Up to the mid nineties Mass schoo l educ ation Higher education Nominalistic Present time Quality mass school education Higher education qualifying professionals Qualitative 1. Up t o the mid seventies The first period corresponds to a selective and elitist education and to the dire ct responsibility of the Ministry of Education for teacher education, which made a process of recognition unnecessary. Until the mid 70's, the State did n o t need to recognise educational programmes as teaching qualifications because it was directly respo nsible for institutions' management and for the processes leading to the acquisition of such qualifications. Primary school teachers were prepared in the non higher education schools governed by the Ministry of Education. Higher education graduates were al lowed to teach as secondary school teachers and only some years later were some of them provided with a specific teacher training programme, also organised by the Ministry of Education and carried out in only a few secondary schools ; a t the end of the prog ramme there was a "State Examination", which certified each individual teacher with a teaching qualification. (Campos 1979 )
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 7 In this period the following aspects should be highlighted: (i) The entity responsible for teacher education, in this case the Educat ion Administration, certified graduates' teaching qualifications; there are policies under which both responsibilities that of providing qualification and that of certifying are separate, although the teacher education institutions can participate in c ertification together with other entities; the principle "the one who qualifies is the one who certifies" has continued in Portugal up to the present. Public recognition of programmes as teaching qualifications was not necessary because the Ministry of Edu cation directly organised and governed the qualifying education; (ii) In secondary education the quality of the specific teacher training programmes was not a policy issue, as they were only available to a small percentage of teachers and corresponded to the n eed to obtain a permanent contract rather than to the suitability of teachers qualifications to the demands of teaching. Graduates from the few existing university programmes created by the Ministry of Education with an identical academic curriculum stru cture, which were more or less automatically recognised as academic teaching qualification, were enough to ensure selective and elitist secondary education, attended by a small percentage of the corresponding age group; (iii) The first type of recognition of tea ching qualifications was that of the programmes as academic qualifications, carried out through an automatic or superficial process; until recently and maybe nowadays, to most people the expression "teaching qualification" only refers to academic qualifica tion and the recognition of teaching qualifications means recognition of academic teaching qualifications; yet, during the last thirty years over 300 higher education programmes have already been created, implemented and recognised as providing professiona l teaching qualifications. 2. Up to the mid nineties The second period was characterised by mass school education and by a shift in the responsibility of teacher education to higher education institutions where several changes occurred which, by the end of this period, created the need for the setting up of a more rigorous system for the recognition of professional teaching qualifications. The growing massification of post primary education, starting in the late 60's, led to the need for speedy recruitme nt of a larger number of people to ensure a supply of teachers (So Pedro et al., 2001) ; as a result, there was an increase in the percentage of people who taught with no professional title and with increasingly insufficient qualifications, even in academ ic terms. Pressure from unions for the professionalisation of secondary education subject teachers before they started teaching increased, mainly because of economic consequences and job security. Moreover, awareness began to emerge, although slowly, that the massification of the school population would require better qualified teachers. At the same time, the trend arrived in Portugal for shifting the responsibility for professional teacher training to higher education institutions (a phenomenon internatio nally known as the universitisation of teacher education) which was particularly well received by recently created new Universities in search of a specific identity in relation to the older ones (Coimbra, Lisboa and Porto). (Campos, 2002 ; Formosinho, 2002 ) These factors, among others, contributed not only to the building up of the political and social acceptance of the need to professionally qualify secondary education
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 8 teachers, before starting their activity, but also to the emergence of a university sup ply in most teaching areas, even in classic universities. Transference of all the components of secondary teachers' education to the university course was followed by transference of teacher education for pre school and primary school education to recentl y created vocational higher education and to universities (Note 3) Initial teacher education therefore ceased to be directly organised and governed by the services of the Ministry of Education, the responsibility being transferred to higher education ins titutions, as had happened in the US several decades previously (Angus, 2001) and has been happening in other European countries ( Campos 2000 b; Moon et al., 2003; Sander et al 1996 ) and Latin American countries (Avalos, 2000) In Portugal, competence to certify graduates' professional qualifications was also attributed to higher education institutions, the principle under which "the one who qualifies is the one who certifies" having been kept on; therefore, teacher education programmes provide and awa rd not only an academic degree ("licenciatura") but also a certificate of qualification for teaching and those holding such a certificate can apply for a job as a teacher in state or private schools because they are thereby licensed to teach (Note 4) As is well known this is not what happens in all countries; the other international tradition in this matter is external certification, in general available only to graduates from programmes recognised as suitable to assure a professional teaching qualificat ion. Meanwhile, in a short period of time, a number of changes occurred in higher education, some of which should be highlighted: massification; recognition of autonomy, not only scientific but also pedagogic; and the proliferation of private providers ( Amaral & Teixeira, 2000; Amaral et al, 2002; Magalhes, 2001; Simo et al., 2002 ) These phenomena have also influenced initial teacher education programmes, which nowadays ascend to about 330 and represent about 20% of the total number of undergraduate hi gher education programmes. Up to the present, corresponding to these changes, there has not been a credible system of public regulation for higher education nor for teacher education programmes (Note 5) In this period the following aspects should be stres sed: (i) Recognition of programmes supplied by higher education as professional teaching qualification became necessary. It was important to know which higher education programmes would see their graduates accepted by the Ministry of Education which has the re sponsibility for primary and secondary education policy and is the greatest employer of teachers. (ii) The recognition process was, however, diluted in the process leading to the programmes State license to run as higher education degrees. This process was led by the Directorate of Higher Education, which did not take into consideration the fact that they were teacher education programmes. This is understandable in a context of an urgent need for more teachers with professional qualifications and of the need to foster the supply of teachers from autonomous higher education institutions, which presumably would do this better than had been done before universitisation of teacher education (iii) Although the programmes to be recognised were all provided by higher educa tion institutions, different Government departments recognised different teaching qualifications: departments of higher education recognised those leading to professional qualifications and the departments of basic and secondary
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 9 education those leading onl y to academic qualifications, since it was still necessary to resort to people only holding this latter qualification. (iv) Therefore, in professional qualification recognition the methodology already used for the recognition of academic qualifications was adop ted: a nominalistic methodology based on the name of the programmes or the subjects and on the assumption that these designations always report to identical realities. 3. Present time As the nineties passed by, and most conditions of access to school had been ensured, success of a greater number of pupils in higher and higher school education levels started to be a matter of more evident social concern. This aim for quality mass school education has direct implications on the role of the teachers, which i s no longer seen as that of a technician but rather that of a professional and raises new demands concerning their education (Campos, 2001 b ; Edwards, 2001 ) Although the changes that occurred in the previous period significantly contributed to solve th e quantitative issues of teacher education, doubts arose as to the qualitative similarity of the qualifications certified by the different institutions for the same teaching activity, and their suitability to the demands of teaching, with added doubts driv en from the new demands quality mass education were raising. Competition among higher education institutions, due to a growing decrease in the demand for school teachers and in the number of students applying to higher education, led them to begin echoing these doubts themselves. No wonder, then, that in the second half of this decade new recognition policies for teacher qualifications emerged. These policies continued not to call for the system of external certification of each graduate's qualification, p ut aside after 25 th April 1974; however, they formally announced a specific system for higher education programme recognition as professional teaching qualification. Some aspects of these policies defined in 1995 should be highlighted: (i) programme recognition as a professional teaching qualification was to be based on a specific analysis; (ii) this analysis would be based on the set of subjects and respective workload that should be embodied in the programme study plan preparing for the same type of qualification. A change in Government having in the meantime taken place, the legal document that consecrated these policy measures was suspended and another new project started which, however, maintained this new recognition system. Yet, the National Council of Educati on where social stakeholders including higher education institutions, are represented, came out against it because, in its opinion, it was based on the name of the subjects and did not therefore, actually judge the substance of the qualification provide d and consequently its suitability to the demands of teaching. The Council recommended that recognition should be based on the methodology of programmes' professional accreditation (CNE, 1996 1999 ) It was in this context that at the end of 1998, the Gov ernment set up the accreditation system of initial teacher education (Portugal, 1 998) It should be not ed that a system of in service teacher education providers and activities accreditation has been in place, since the early nineties (Campos, 1999). The refore, the following factors, among others, contributed to the emergence of a system for the accreditation of initial teacher education:
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 10 (i) The rapid massification and privatisation of higher education, simultaneously with its greater autonomy in the decisio n to run and implement programmes, raised doubts as to the comparability of the qualifications provided by all the programmes intended to prepare for the same teaching area, and as to the evidence that the analysis of the names of programmes and their subj ects, as well as of their respective workloads, would not (?) be enough for the purpose; do, for instance, all programmes qualifying to be a teacher of Maths in secondary education provide students with a similar qualification or are there significant diff erences among them? (ii) In addition to these possible differences which it was urgent to avoid, a lack of a culture of professional qualification in teaching field in higher education institutions and the emergence of evidence of the graduates insufficient pr ofessional preparation (for instance, not being able to teach children how to read and write, even though they had possibly learned a number of linguistic theories) began to raise suspicion as to the suitability of the qualifications provided by higher edu cation institutions to the demands of teaching (Afonso & Canrio, 2002; Estrela et al 2002) ; if it is true that, in the first case, comparison among programmes is at stake, it is also true that the issue here is comparison of programmes to the same exte rnal criteria. (iii) These doubts as to the substance of the qualification provided by the programmes emerged in a moment when, on the one hand, there began to be a surplus in programme and graduate supply (it is an international constant that requirements for t he quality of teaching qualifications are more or less rigorous depending on the mismatch of supply and demand of teachers) and, on the other hand, previous political concern about massification of access to school education began to be replaced by a conce rn about the quality of mass education, which implies new demands for the professional roles and qualifications of teachers. So, there was a need for regulation of the total, or almost total, higher education autonomy in the certification of teaching qua lifications for school education, thus putting an end to the situation of complete deregulation of the process of public recognition of teaching qualifications. II I The Portuguese System For The Accreditation Of Teacher Education Ensuring the correct b alance between higher education autonomy and public quality assurance was therefore the framework for the Portuguese teacher education accreditation system to be designed. The challenge was to ensure appropriat e ness of teaching qualifications to the school education needs sa f eguarding the scientific and pedagogical autonomy of higher education institutions. 1. Accreditation and the recognition of higher education institutions as entities certifying professional qualifications for teaching Until recently, the process of recognition of Portuguese initial teacher education programmes as providing and awarding a professional teaching qualification, besides an academic degree, was merged in the general recognition process common to all higher education progra mmes, which, in turn, used to pay little or no attention to their professional dimension ( Campos, 1996; 2000 a ).
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 11 The accreditation system of teacher education programmes set up in 1999, put an end to this situation ( Portugal, 1999) From then onwards: (i) Pr evious accreditation ( ex ante ) of such programmes became a necessary condition, although not sufficient, to obtain the license to run it as a programme recognised as providing and awarding a professional teaching qualification; (ii) moreover, to maintain their license to be run as programmes thus recognised, they must submit to periodically renewable accreditation (ex post) ; (iii) finally, for this same purpose, all teacher education programmes presently running must also submit to one first ex post accreditation proc ess. Thus, accreditation has become the process chosen to recognise higher education institutions as the entities that certify professional qualifications for teaching of graduates in their teacher education programmes (Note 6 ) 2. Features of the accredi tation process It is worth distinguishing the process of accreditation from its effects in terms of decisions arising from its results and taken by the different actors, including the State. Some of the effects attributed by the State have already been m entioned and we will return to this question later. We will now deal with the nature of the process itself. The accreditation of a teacher education programme is "the recognition of this programme's suitability to the demands of the teaching performance a t the level and education area it is aimed at" (Portugal, 1999) Therefore, it consists of (i) a judgement of a scientific, pedagogical and professional nature, which is (ii) conclusive as to the programme's suitability; (iii) it includes criteria and standards set out from outside the higher education institutions (iv) which are specific to teacher education programmes, and (v) drawn up by an independent public body, in which various social actors participate. So, it is (i) a professional accreditation process, and not a merely a cademic one, (ii) of programmes and not of institutions, (iii) based on criteria and standards externally defined and not defined by the higher education institution itself, (iv) which are based on the demands of teaching and not merely on the demands driven from the lev el of the academic degree it awards (as is the case of purely academic accreditation), and (v) of a purely scientific, pedagogical and professional nature, with no interference from political options, such as, for instance, the quantitative needs of the teache r employment market. (vi) t he accreditation entity is independent of the entities that can apply to the accreditation of their programmes, and (vii) the Accreditation Committee includes basic and secondary school teachers besides higher education teachers
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 12 3. An in dependent and socially participated accreditation body The body responsible for the development of the accreditation process is INAFOP (National Institute for Accreditation of Teacher Education) (Portugal, 1998) It is an independent public body created b y the Government. Its existence and mission rely upon a political governmental option. However, the process leading to a statement on the accreditation of a programme is completely independent and there is no possibility of appeal to the Government (only t o administrative courts for formal process reasons). That is the development of the accreditation system and the process of accrediting specific programmes w ere put into the hands of all entities interested in the appropriateness of teacher education to s c h ool education needs INAFOP is in fact, governed by a General Council including representatives nominated by a number of stakeholders: (i) teacher education institutions, (ii ) primary and secondary education teachers unions and associations (ii i) public and private employers of teachers (iv) other stakeholders (departments of the Ministry of Education, student teachers, parents of students from all education levels, and also companies). Thus constituted on the basis of the social participation of the main stakeholders interested in the suitability of initial teacher education to the demands of teaching, the main duty of this General Council is strategic decision making. It never passes judgement on the accreditation of a specific programme, but it approves the accreditation regulations and the standards that serve as a framework for accreditation; the General Council also appoints the members of the Accreditation Committee. The Accreditation Committee is composed of experts chosen on an individ ual basis for their recognised competence. This Committee analyses and decides on the accreditation applications. It may include teachers from teacher education institutions, school education teachers and experts in organisation, development, evaluation or accreditation of curricula for the education of teachers or of other professionals. Whenever necessary, according to the teaching areas of the programmes applying for accreditation, temporary subcommittees are also constituted within the Accreditation Com mittee, composed of teachers from different education levels related to those areas; the inclusion of students is also possible. Whereas review of the accreditation applications and the decision proposal is the duty of these subcommittees, actual decisions on accreditation are taken by the permanent members of the Accreditation Committee to avoid the risk of heterogeneity in the interpretation of the accreditation criteria. The accreditation body acts, therefore, in an independent way in relation to the Go vernment and to the institutions that apply for accreditation. This independence is a condition for the credibility of the process. On the one hand, self accreditation makes no sense; on the other hand, if submitted to political criteria or to the pressure of party and election politics, the exclusive scientific, pedagogic and professional character of the judgement underlying the decision regarding accreditation would not be assured. The fact of being governed by a wide socially participated structure all ows for a process of collective bargaining between representatives of the providers and of the social demand The cost of this wide social participation is the time it takes to get broad consensus; the risk comes from possible impasse situations or decisio ns driven from the coalition of interests hardly compatible with public interest. The benefits of social consensus justify the costs. Impasse has never occurred up to now and the minority position of the representation
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 13 of each interest, as well as the grea t diversity of interests represented, has prevented the risk of coalition. However, it should be stressed that within the accreditation entity there is a distinction between the body responsible for its strategic guidance and the body responsible for the a ccreditation of programmes; the former is constituted on a basis of social representation, whereas the latter is based on individual competence. 4. Criteria for accreditation To analyse the suitability of programmes to the demands of teaching some crit eria ( Teacher Education Standards and Professional Teaching Profiles) have been set out (INAFOP, 2000 b ; Portugal, 2001 a, 2001 b ) These criteria refer to (i) objectives and outcomes of programmes, (ii) processes devised for the implementation of those objectives, (iii) actors responsible for those processes and (iv) resources needed. Ideally, criteria related to the objectives/outcomes would be sufficient to judge whether the programme aims are suited to the social and school education demands of the expected role of teache rs (in the case of the previous accreditation of new programmes) or whether they do, in fact, provide their graduates with a professional qualification that meets those demands (in the case of the full accreditation of ongoing programmes which have been co mpleted by some students). Moreover, the international trend for accreditation systems is centred on evidence of outcomes, thus inverting previous practices exclusively focusing on actors, resources and processes and for this reason they are more institut ion than programme centred (Cochran Smith, 2001; Eaton, 2003) ; by definition, the evidence about qualifications outcomes is more crucial in the case of professional accreditation of specific programm e If it is true that this new orientation seems bette r suited to the aims of accreditation and should therefore be taken into consideration, it is also true that, so far at least, it has not been considered wise for there to be a complete withdrawal from criteria concerning actors, resources and processes. T here are two main reasons for this: (i) on the one hand, teacher education institutions still need some more time to acquire experience in identifying the outcomes of programmes and in assessing their suitability to the qualifications and competences neede d for teaching, in order to be able to provide the evidence when applying for accreditation, and, (ii) on the other hand, there are some outcomes which are not only difficult to identify but whose relevance for teaching is only latter manifested. However consideration of criteria related to actors, resources and processes is only justified if there are at least well founded hypotheses that they are related to the attainment of results. And if it is true that the relationship between the satisfaction of t hese criteria and the assurance of outcome achievement will always be considered in terms of more or less plausible hypotheses, depending on their grounding in research or widespread sound practices, it is also true that lack of satisfaction of such criter ia can, and often does, denounce lack of outcome achievement. However, when choosing these criteria there is the need to consider their probable relationship with the attainment of the outcomes expected in terms of the qualification to be acquired, thus co ntradicting the practice of attributing them value on their own, which is quite common in quality assurance systems which pay little attention to the outcomes.
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 14 Moreover, a nalysing the criteria selected in this accreditation system it is clear that the ma jority of them do not refer to specific situations or behaviours, whose presence, objectively observable and possibly quantifiable, would be an indicator of the suitability of the programme. On the contrary, they generally refer to principles of teacher ed ucation curriculum development, compatible with a wide range of concrete solutions developed by the education institutions; accreditation should judge to what extent these solutions fit the criteria devised in the principles. Generally speaking, the accred itation criteria are not therefore indicators but rather broad principles ; and the process of accreditation does not consist of checking the presence or absence of such indicators, but rather of judging how far the institutional solutions are suited to pr inciples related to objectives/outcomes, actors, resources and processes. It should be highlighted that these criteria have been made public so that the framework on which analysis of suitability is based is public knowledge, thus minimising the possibilit y of depending on the implicit agenda of each member of the subcommittees and of the Accreditation Committee. The fact that accreditation is judging rather than checking gives rise to important consequences concerning the competence of the members of bot h of these bodies. And the fact that the criteria are mostly principles rather than indicators and that they emphasise the outcomes (rather than the actors, resources and processes) is relevant for making accreditation compatible with higher education auto nomy and innovation. Let us exemplify what has been just said on accreditation criteria in relation to programmes' objectives/outcomes. Here, the Standards set out as a criterion: "The programme develops in prospective teachers the qualifications and comp etences necessary for teaching and lifelong learning, based on a teacher education project which expressly takes into account: (i) the legally defined, general and specific professional profiles; (ii) the curriculum for primary and secondary education; (iii) scientific and technological development; (iv) the relevant conclusions from research in field of education; (v) changes in society, schools and teacher profiles; (vi) the guidelines of national education policy (INAFOP, 2000 b) Criteria would be indicators if they defined the specific qualifications (knowledge, methodologies, attitudes, skills) prospective teachers should have acquired at the end of the programme (what they should learn); or else, if they defined the curriculum units that should be included in the study plan s (what they should be taught) as happens in some European countries where there is still a governmental definition of teacher education curricula (Eurydice 2002) In fact, professional teaching profiles are also a mong the externally defined paramet ers: a general profile, common to all school teachers, and specific profiles for each teaching area (Portugal, 2001 a;2001 b) Although they do not constitute a framework only directed to accreditation (as they also guide teacher education curriculum organ isation to be undertaken by institutions), they do constitute an important framework to judge the suitability of the curriculum objectives selected by the institutions and their outcomes regarding the demands of teaching, that is, regarding social demand. These profiles are the outcome focused teacher education criteria. The philosophy underlying the profiles is the same as for standards. The definition of professional profiles frequently includes : (i) the level of professional qualification; (ii) the professional performance field ;
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 15 (iii) the characterisation of the expected role of the professional; (iv) the qualifications needed for that performance; and (v) the learning opportunities to promote those qualifications. In our case, external definition of the professional profile is restricted to the first three aspects, with special attention to the third one, leaving the others up to higher education institutions F ocusing the definition of teaching profile only on the role of the teachers is no t the common trend in other teacher education accreditation systems where the last two aspects are still taken into consideration which leads to criticism of these systems (Delandshere & Petrosky, 2004) T he Portugues e option not to define a curriculum is due to the fact that teacher educa tion has been increasingly supplied by more and more autonomous universities, on the one hand, and to the increasing consideration of teaching as a professional activity, rather than as a technic al one on the other hand (Campos, 2001 b ; Edwards, 2001 ). An d, of course, the vision of teaching as pr ofessional activity also applies to te achers educators. Let us consider an example. In the general teaching profile, one of the characterisations of the role of the teacher is as follows: Participates in the conc eption, development and evaluation of the school educational project and its curriculum projects, as well as in the school management activities, paying close attention to the link between the teaching levels (Portugal, 2001 a) In this way, no definition is given either of the qualifications to be acquired or of the curriculum units needed. The accreditation process will judge whether the qualifications and curriculum units set out and implemented by the autonomous teacher education institutions are able to ensure the preparation needed for teaching. Th e assumption underlying th e accreditation process is that teacher education should not only be supply driven but also demand driven. The criteria (standards and profiles) set out the external parameters to be considered in the analysis of the institutional solutions. When providers wish their programmes to be recognised as qualifying people to teach, their scientific and pedagogic autonomy does not exempt them from taking into consideration the aspects rel ated to social demand in the organisation of their teacher education provision without ignoring the fact they can and should actively contribute to the formulation of this deman d. 5. Steps in the accreditation process The accreditation process begins wit h an application made by the institution responsible for the programme. This application means that the institution wishes the programme to be recognised as a professional teaching qualification, thus being recognised as qualified to certify its graduates. The institution is mainly expected to present evidence in the application that the programme satisfies the demands of teaching for the level or teaching area it is aimed at (INAFOP, 2001 a) In this way, the onus of proof is on the teacher education ins titutions, which will face a difficult task if they do not rely on a permanent system for the monitoring and evaluation of programme development ; in fact, b esides contributing to programme improvement, this system also enables the institutions to become pu blicly accountable, namely when they apply for accreditation.
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 16 The institution is mainly expected to demonstrate that: (i) the qualifications (knowledge, skills, methodologies, attitudes) and competences (capacity to mobilise the qualifications acquired to so lve problems arising from real context based situations) provided by the programme are those needed to meet the demands of teaching, namely in relation to the respective professional teacher profiles; (ii) all graduates acquire these qualifications and competen ces; (iii) develops the programmes in appropriate partnership with schools; (iv) in the institution and in the schools there are the actors and resources needed, in quantity and quality, to devise, develop and evaluate a process intending to provide students with the learning opportunities to acquire the qualifications and competences; (v) in the institution there are leading and managing structures for the conception, development, monitoring and quality assurance of the teacher education process, both to ensure the quali fication needed for teaching and to elicit evidence of the presence of expected outcomes in terms of qualification and performance in the short and medium term. The fact that the onus of proof is on the institution applying represents a n advantage for th e institution and for the flexibility of the accreditation process as it fosters innovation in the teacher education project and contributes to contradicting the idea that accreditation inhibits innovation; in fact, it is enough that the institution shows the relevance of such innovation. Application is followed by the analysis of this demonstration. The specific accreditation subcommittees are not supposed either to evaluate the programme or subsequently to demonstrate its suitability both are the resp onsibility of the teacher education institution. For the analysis of the application (INAFOP, 2002 a) the subcommittee can call for (i) the respective dossier and (ii) a visit to the institution (which, in the case of new programmes, is replaced by a meeting sessi on with people responsible for the programme) to take place after a preliminary analysis of the dossier. This visit is intended to clarify any issues that might arise from this preliminary analysis and to allow for the institution to complement the demonst ration provided with any elements difficult to include in the dossier. With this objective, there are: (i) meeting sessions with the different actors (not only teachers, but also with prospective teachers, managers and teachers from partner schools and support personnel) (ii) document analysis (for instance, tests not only test given but also students' responses and their corresponding assessment); (iii) observation of the existence, state of conservation and updating and conditions of use of the equipment and premises needed to accomplish the programme's professional objectives. When the appreciation is over, the subcommittee prepares a report and sends it to the institution for possible feedback. After the given deadline for this feedback the subcommittee makes the fi nal adjustments to their report, when justified.
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 17 Finally, the subcommittee prepares a well founded decision proposal to be submitted to the scrutiny of the permanent Accreditation Committee. There are three possible decision statements (INAFOP, 2000 a) : (i) a ccreditation for a six year period with or without recommendations; (ii) accreditation for a four year period with renewal dependent on the attainment of certain objectives (the validity period of ex ante accreditation of new programmes is also a four year p eriod); (iii) accreditation withdrawal (in this case, the decision only becomes effective if by the end of a defined period, not longer than one year, changes have not been made which make accreditation possible). The decision on accreditation as well as its ba sis is publicised. It is also up to the accreditation body to promote and disseminate overall analyses of the applications and appreciations aiming to characterise the quality of teacher education in the country, identifying critical aspects or new challen ges to be addressed. 6. Effects of accreditation decisions The mission of the accreditation body can be summed up as the provision and communication of a conclusive statement on the programme's suitability or lack thereof to the demands of the teaching ro le, based on the analysis of an application dossier and an ensuing visit. The definition of effects of such a judgement is not within the scope of competence of the accreditation body This depends on the subsequent decisions of the actors to whom it has b een made known W ith regard to policy actors, the G overnment has already established some effects (Portugal, 1999): (i) accreditation is a necessary condition for a license to run a new programme, as a programme recognised as providing and awarding professio nal teaching qualification (however, it is not a sufficient condition and an accredited programme can be refused this license to function for other reasons); (ii) accreditation withdrawal of an ongoing programme, as a result of the process of accreditation rene wal, is a sufficient condition for the withdrawal of the licence to run as a programme recognised as providing and awarding a professional teaching qualification, even for the students who are still attending it. It is inevitable that the accreditation o f these programmes influences different actors' decisions and attitudes. To begin with, it can influence present and future students' demand for these programmes, as well as their mobility among teacher education institutions. Besides, teacher employers wi ll certainly take them into account in their recruitment selection procedures which only happens in the private sector in Portugal; the fact that the public employer does not rely upon selection procedures, only trusting teacher education institution diplo mas, increases the social relevance of accreditation and the need to be rigorous in its attribution, as it is the only guarantee external to the institutions that society can have in the certification of their graduates professional qualification. Among parents and employers accreditation can also influence the social credibility teacher education institutions enjoy. What is more it can influence the credibility of teachers whose qualification is provided and assured by them, of the schools where they tea ch and of the students attending those schools. Underlying the existence of the accreditation process is the assumption that the quality of teacher qualifications influences their professional performance and students' learning in a very significant way.
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 18 For teacher education institutions the accreditation can be external pressure for an agenda for change or innovation in their programmes This can happen before applying for accreditation or after being accredited when recommendations are made or condition s for renewal are established. In fact, even if quality assurance is the first goal of accreditation quality improvement is also an important one. The external pressure for improvement is more relevant when a cultural shift in teacher education models is needed, as is the case nowadays: from academic and technical models to professional one s Finally, in the context of the increasing internationalisation of higher education and the labour market, accreditation can contribute to enhancing recognition in ot her countries on account of the assurance it provides of the professional teaching qualification IV Strategy of Implementation of t he Accreditation System The development of a new system for the recognition of teacher qualification programmes is not a m ere technical and rational process, but rather one of cultural and political change. This new system, that of accreditation, does, in fact, mean a significant change for higher education institutions: it implies new practices and comes into conflict with s ome of their values and with power sharing within and among institutions and with society (Brennan & Shah 2000; Morley, 2003) Besides the fact that the governance of the accreditation body belongs to a socially participated consortium, a strategy of wid e social participation in the setting out and implementation of its structuring features and of promotion of public debate on the culture of professional teacher education in higher education was chosen f or the development of the system This strategy was intended to contribute among teacher educators (i) to allay the understandable initial caution towards the accreditation system, (ii) to help them to perceive its added value, creating positive exp ectations, (iii) to promote their active participation in its implem entation and (iv) to promote aware ness of the relevance of the dialogue with s c hool teachers in order to have privileged input regarding teacher education curriculum development and evaluation. 1. Wide social participation The participation of the main social actors in the context of teacher education has, by political option, been a constant in the development of the system both in the phase of preparation of policy decision makin g that culminated in the setting up of the accreditation body an d of the accreditation system a s well as in the phase of its implementation In the first phase, the Government created a Task Force to prepare a proposal on the accreditation body and system. In the preparation of their proposals, approved by consensus, this Task Force disseminated preliminary versions and organised public debates with the participation of representatives from teacher education institutions (teacher educators and students) and teacher associations (Grupo de Misso, 1998). In turn, after h aving transformed these proposals into a project for legal dec ree, the Government submitted them to the appreciation of higher education representatives In the implementation phase, preliminary versions of all the main documents of the accreditation syst em (Programme Standards, Teaching Qualifications Profiles, Ap plication and Review Guidelines ) were also widely disseminated, with hundreds of appreciation reports being received; these documents were also the subject of a great debate in numerous well atte nded seminars organised for this purpose all over t he country Final versions were approved by wide consensus in the General Council of the accreditation body;
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 19 the Profiles were also approved by Government Decree Law, without changing the proposals present ed by the accreditation body (INAFOP, 2000 c; 2001 b; 2002 b). 2. Public debate on the culture of professional teaching qualifications in higher education Higher education has no tradition in professional teacher education. Therefore, for this purpose, i t merely added the academic tradition of the university programmes (that ensure preparation in a certain subject) to the craft/t echnical tradition of class teacher education programmes in former non higher vocational education and training schools. The fac t is that this adding solution is not suitable for quality mass education demands for the preparation of teachers as highly qualified professionals ( Andersson, 2002; Buchberger, 2000; Buchberger et al ., 2000 ; Campos, 2001, 2002; Edwards, 2001 ). Consequentl y, the challenge basic and secondary education implies for higher education is that of the construction of a teacher education culture as highly qualified professionals, and no longer as mere technicians (Note 7 ) Portuguese h igher education institutions a re committed to this task ; namely a greater investment was made in the upgrading of many teacher educators (Campos, 2001 a) However, it is fair to recognise that there is still a long way to go and that each institution's experience in this process is dif ferent ( Afonso & Can rio, 2002 ; Formosinho, 2002). Although the core mission of the accreditation body is to judge the suitability of programmes to give a guarantee to society, it was considered important to foster interchange of ideas and practices and debate on a teacher education culture in higher education, viewing teachers as professionals (Alarco, 2001; Canrio, 2001; Roldo, 2001; Stuart & Tatto, 2000). This interchange and debate is intended to promote awareness of the changes to be made, as well as of the resistance arising from the current logic of organisation and functioning in higher education institutions thus contributing to the perception and acceptance of the meaning of accreditation and of its added value for such a change. In this c ontext, without ignoring the contribution public debate brought to the preliminary versions of the main documents, several widely participated seminars were also organised on some aspects of the above mentioned culture, which have also been disseminated th rough the web page of the a ccreditation body and through commercial publication of their resulting texts. With the same purpose, some further texts on teacher education produced in other countries were also disseminated through the web page (INAFOP, 2001 b ; 2002 b). V. The Power Exerted b y Social Actors o n t he Development o f t he System By the end of the first quarter of 2001, 21 months after the setting up of the system, all the conditions that depended on the accreditation body had already been created to allow for accreditation application; the lengthy duration of this period of preparation was due to the widely socially participated basis of the system. It was also necessary to wait for the Government to define professional profiles for teachers. In A ugust 2001, the general profile common to all teachers and the specific profiles for pre school and primary education teachers were published. This made it possible to announce the acceptance of accreditation applications for training programmes for pre sc hool and primary school teachers, the teacher education institutions having been given a seven month preparation period. By the end of April 2002, the accreditation body had recorded 66 application
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 20 dossiers corresponding to all the existing ongoing program mes: 33 preparing pre school teachers and the 33 preparing primary education teachers. The analysis subcommittees were also formed and, after having participated in several preparation workshops, they started work. In the meanwhile elections for Parliame nt took place, from which resulted a new Governmen t which, on May 2002 extinguished the accreditation body and the ongoing analysis process of the accreditation applications from 66 initial teacher education programmes was cancelled (Note 8) The official reasons for this political decision were to save money ; in fact, dozen s of public institutes were extinguished at the same time A political analysis of the develop ment of the system could perhaps highlight some other reasons. 1. The desired balance of power among the different actors Although there are a number of social actors with interests in the definition of who is properly qualified to teach, it can be seen from the experience of several countries, that mainly three of them actually do exert powe r (Angus, 2001 ; Cameron, 1996 ) : (i) the State (responsible for school education policy and for its national curricula and, often, the greatest employer of teachers); (ii) teacher education institutions (including students), and (iii) school education teachers. In Portug al, during recent decades, with the shifting of the responsibility for teacher education to higher education institutions, and with the simultaneous recognition of their scientific and pedagogical autonomy, the State ceased to exert power in the same way i t traditionally did, without having built a new form of exerting some form of power in order to assure society on the suitability of the education programmes provided. Higher education institutions came to exert, almost exclusively, the power to define the qualifying programmes and to certify graduates. Unlike what happens in other professions, schoolteachers themselves have not exerted real power in this matter. The situation where society is in the best position to obtain better guarantees concerning the qualification of their teachers is perhaps the one where there is an interdependent use of these three powers. This is surely not the case when only one of them is exerted, and much less so when the power exerted is that of the institutions which simultan eously have a double function: providing teacher education and exclusively assuring its suitability to the needs of social demand. The development of the accreditation system aimed at building up a new configuration in the use of the power of these three social actors, departing from a situation of almost complete public deregulation of the process of defining teacher qualifications. 2. The expected behaviour of social actors The initiative to change the system was taken by the State through the Governme nt, the only one with real power for the purpose. The probabilities of its success would most likely depend on it being acknowledged by the Government that the policy was theirs and not only that of the minister who proposed it. It would also depend on the Government exerting its power throughout the first phase of the process of development, which would be increasingly difficult if the Minister or the Government changed. Indeed it would be necessary, during the implementation of the system, to manage the p olitical
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 21 conditions which would guarantee the support of the councils of public higher education institutions. From higher education institutions, opposition and support were simultaneously expected: opposition mainly from professors because they held the power almost exclusively; opposition from providing institutions, mainly those in fear that their programme supply could be questioned; support mainly from the institutions' governing boards, to the extent to which they would perceive the advantages of an potential decrease in the number of programmes to be supplied by other concurrent institutions (which would, anyway, be difficult under their double condition of professor and member of a governing board); support, once again, if they welcomed the reinfor cement of the power of the institution over the power of the individual members of the academic corporation, organised around knowledge fields, who are generally a source of resistance to the pedagogical autonomy of the institution in developing programmes based on professional teaching profiles (Brennan & Shah 2000; Morley, 2003) Only a slow and progressive consolidation of the conditions that would allow primary and secondary education teachers to exert the power expected from them but not yet conque red was expected. There is no professional order representing them, moreover within the universe of teachers there are several divisions that make the exercise of power very difficult, among which two stand out: to this universe belong the trainers and trainees, both teachers, with different interests in this matter; besides, for this universe there are several unions and pedagogical professional associations. On the other hand, although school teachers, together with the State, are the ones in the best position to know most about the demands of teaching, unfortunately, they do not yet enjoy social credibility enough for the purpose, namely among the supplying institutions, specially if they are universities. 3. The social actors' actual behaviour The intention to rely on the system for professional accreditation of programmes in order to get public recognition for them as teaching qualification came from the Ministry of Education during a movement within higher education institutions, with a strong par ticipation of students. Some of these institutions questioned the ability of others to ensure suitable teaching qualifications. The government wanted teacher education for lower secondary education (which in Portugal belongs to basic compulsory education) to be provided also by Teacher Education Colleges, which already ensured initial teacher education for pre and primary school; the implicit idea was that these Colleges were better qualified to prepare curriculum centred teachers for basic compulsory educ ation (thus contributing to enhance success in a mass school) than universities, which mainly prepare subject centred teachers. This government initiative caused a reaction from universities and their students, which in order to avoid this concurrent open ing up of supply, argued that Teacher Education Colleges were not able to provide quality teaching qualification for these teachers. Colleges and their students counter argued they were better able to ensure teacher education for basic education as a whole The Minister, then, proposed that all the programmes, whatever the institution wishing to supply them, should be submitted to an identical process of professional accreditation, to be carried out by an independent body, which would assure that only the p rogrammes suited to the demands of teaching would run. This calmed the students down and also the institutions, at least apparently. Universities accepted the cost of accreditation, hoping that in this way proliferation of concurrent programmes would be
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 22 a voided; for Teacher Education Colleges, integrated in Vocational Higher Education institutions, this was the cost to be paid to increase their supply. Although the professional accreditation system for initial teacher education has its justification in th e above mentioned reasons, the truth is its development was conditioned by the historical circumstances in which the political decision had been taken. In the years that followed the setting up of the accreditation body and system, several facts happened which led to the feeling among education institutions that Government was not sticking to the conditions for this political pact which partly came from the fact that in a few years three Ministers of Education followed the one who pushed this social pact forward, although the Prime Minister was the same. In fact, the legal possibility for Teacher Education Colleges to provide teacher education programmes for lower secondary education has never been regulated (Note 9 ) As a consequence, Government depende nt conditions for the accreditation of subject teachers programmes have not been implemented either. Such conditions are the definition of teacher qualification areas and their respective teaching profiles. In the absence of the government's fulfilment of the conditions of the political pact that led the institution leaders to accept the accreditation system, it is no wonder that university leaders started to see no immediate interest in it and vocational higher education leaders started to attack it, hopi ng to lead the Government to stick to its promises. The latter found powerful allies in well known figures in higher education who had never accepted accreditation or who would only accept it if it followed a methodology close to the aforementioned nomina listic one, instead of the internationally consensual parameters characterising it. The two most common visible arguments were, firstly, the incompatibility of accreditation with higher education autonomy and, secondly, that of duplication of functions wi th higher education evaluation system. This article shows that the development of the accreditation system was guided by the main principle of rebuilding the correct balance between higher education autonomy and public assurance teaching qualifications F urthermore, i t should be stressed that university autonomy refers to its own competences and that, nowhere in the world, do those include dealing with the regulation of access to a professional activity, whether it be for engineers, architects or teachers. Besides, critics themselves know, and have proclaimed, there is strong imbalance in the qualifications provided by the different teacher education institutions, which even taken together have no power to overcome this situation by themselves. And it is al so clear that accreditation application is only necessary for the higher education institutions interested in their programmes becoming externally recognised as a teaching qualification and that they become themselves the qualification certifying entities (Campos 2003 ) As for the Portuguese system for higher education evaluation, it goes without saying that it does not possess the characteristics internationally considered as indispensable to be recognised as a professional accreditation system or even e xternal quality control mechanism. This is because it has focused on the not less important mission to support internal evaluation of institutions. There would not be any sense in undertaking this mission and making people believe that the other is also ca rried out B esides, it is generally considered impossible to simultaneously undertake both functions efficiently ; i t is not possible to perform the function of consultant of institutions in supporting them to fulfil their responsibility to build up program me quality and to be publicly accountable, and simultaneously be the auditor of those accounts, assuring society of that same quality. It
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 23 should also be outlined that in Europe, in the countries where the need for academic accreditation has arisen in the context of the implementation of the Bologna process, the higher education evaluation systems similar to the Portuguese are not being recognised as suitable for this purpose This ha ppen ed for instance with t he Dutch evaluation system the inspiration for the Portuguese one (Committee Accreditation of Dutch Higher Education, 2001) The real issue here is merely the exertion of power by the higher education sector In fact, accreditation may constitute a threat to corporate, labour and economic interest s, which are in this way protected under the pretext of defending public interest. The important thing is that the Government, responsible for the defence of public interest, namely that of the quality of basic and secondary education, does effectively exe rt its own power because, in this matter, the profession alone is not able to exert it in an efficient way. The new cent re right Government has until now exerted its po wer to stop the successful development of the accreditation system which all the interes ted entities were steering together S ocial participation in policy development is not a strategy of choice by a cent re right government. O bjectively with out creating an alternative, the political priority of the new Portuguese Government is putting the interests of the providers above those of the users (R o ndall,2002) or, at least, no t challenging the former, namely private providers ; the public interests or the interests of users are left behind. VI. Some Conclusions In this article the politica l context and the process of the development of the Portuguese system for teacher education accreditation as wel l its final configuration were described and analysed The goal of the analysis was to show the path taken to ensure that the system developed could have an influence o n the appropriat e ness of teacher education to school education needs while safeguarding the scientific and pedagogical autonomy of higher education institutions and of the teaching profession. T h ere are at least three main chara cteristics of this teacher education accreditation system that distinguish it from others and whose aims are to overcome some of the most frequent critic i s m of higher education accreditation system s in general. They are: (i) t he governance of the system is i n the hands of a consortium including the representatives of a wide range of specific interests in the quality of teacher education, namely schoo l teachers, teacher educators, employers of teachers parents students, education administrators other employ ers ; (ii) the definition of accreditation criteria and methodology is made following consultation and debate widely participated by the teaching profession: teacher educators and school teachers associations and unions; (iii) the professional profile s of teacher s which make clear the outcome criteria for accreditation are defined by the socially expected role of the teacher s and not by the curriculum deemed appropriate fo r preparing them for such a role. As the development o f the system was cancelled it is no t possible to refer to its impact on the quality of teacher education in Portugal Nevertheless, s ome conclusions can be drawn from this outline of the Portuguese accreditation system: 1. The social perception of the need for a more qualitatively demandin g system for the recognition of teachers qualifications is sharper when the State transfers direct
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 24 responsibility for teacher education to higher education institutions and they simultaneously become autonomous, massified and privatised. 2. The need for such a system becomes more obvious if there is also, on the one hand, a clear and socially supported political goal to achieve quality mass education and, on the other hand the understanding that such a goal is not compatible with the role of teachers as mere technicians and that without external pressure higher education institutions are not able to ensure the qualification of teachers as professionals. 3. Apart from this, a more demanding policy tends to arise when there is a surplus of teacher educati on supply, either because it has boomed or because the number of school students has decreased. 4. The way in which each country in each historical moment deals with the problem of public recognition of teacher qualifications is in fact tightly related t o two factors: on the one hand, to the policies of basic, secondary and higher education and, on the other hand, to teacher education supply and demand. Therefore, solutions should be context based, avoiding a critical imitation of systems and methodologie s perhaps considered as good practices in other countries. 5. In its turn, the process of decision making and implementation of the solutions chosen depends on the power that the social actors, at that precise moment, will be able to exert. The main socia l actor is the State and others are teacher education institutions, including both teachers and students, and the organisations representing school teachers. It does not seem desirable that the power to influence the recognition of teachers qualification should reside exclusively, or is highly concentrated, in only one of these actors; moreover, with the aim of building up a balance of interdependent powers, public incentives seem to be necessary to increase the power to be exerted by school teachers. 6. To solve the policy issue outlined at the beginning of this case study, the option for a professional accreditation system of teacher education programmes supplied by autonomous higher education requires a change in practices, in values and in power shared among these institutions, which understandably gives rise to opposition. That is why one should bear in mind that, besides the vital power balance of actors (among which the State will probably be the only one having the possibility to contravene signific ant unbalanced situations), merely technical and rationalist strategies for the implementation of the system would surely be insufficient. 7. The option to accredit programmes, trusting in the certification of graduates' qualifications carried out by the tea cher education institutions, has limitations concerning the guarantee of the teaching competence of those who become teachers. The less the institutions are able to prove their graduates teaching competence, the greater these limitations become. As they must be called to account for the competence of their graduates both at the end of the programme and during their future teaching, a suitable device for programme monitoring and internal evaluation in each institution is a sine qua non condition for trustw orthy accreditation.
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 25 8. It is in the context of the limits to the guarantee given by the accreditation system and of the opposition this causes that the alternative arises to call for an external certification system of each teacher's professional competence However, this also has well known limitations, namely due to difficulties in building up reliable methodologies, mainly if they do not include the observation of teacher performance over a long period. This is why one of the alternatives might be to rely upon both systems in a complementary way. Or otherwise to focus on the system that in each historical context seems able to best solve the policy issue as it is seen at that particular moment. Notes 1) Based on a invited communication presented at the R egional Conference "Teachers Performance in Latin America and the Caribbean: N ew priorities" (Braslia, 10 to 12 July 2002) organised by the Inter American Development Bank, in partnership with UNESCO and the Ministry of Education of Brazil 2) The author was, from late 1998 to 2002, the President of the National Institute for Accreditation of Teacher Education (INAFOP), the body created to develop the P ortuguese system for the accreditation of initial teacher education Obviously, t herefore, the descript ion and analysis in this article could be considered one sided. 3) Universities can and do supply education programmes for all pre school and school education, whereas Teacher Education Colleges integrated in vocational higher education, supply teacher education programmes for class teachers ( in pre school and primary education). All programmes are "licenciatura" degree programmes lasting 4 years for class teachers and 5 years for secondary education subject teachers. 4) This is the only case where Po rtuguese higher education is supposed to organise programmes in such a way as to provide professional qualification and to certify it. In the case of other professions, such as engineers, doctors and lawyers, universities only provide programmes awarding a n academic degree; it is the task of professional Orders to attribute the professional title that gives access to the license to perform the profession. Some of them, however, exempt graduates from certain requirements they usually ask for in the case of p rofessional qualification certification when these graduates come from programmes accredited by those Orders (following application by the higher education institutions that provide those programmes) (Salgado Barros, 2001). In Portugal, there is no profess ional Order for teachers, though there is a movement in favour of it, which has the opposition of teachers unions. There are a number of difficulties to its creation by the State. Besides the traditional objections related to difficulties of Orders in har monizing public interests and those of the corporation, maybe there is also the fact that teaching is not exclusively based on professional knowledge grounded in research and consolidated professional practice. In fact, teaching is still limited by the sta te policy for basic and secondary education that defines a curriculum, including the objectives, the organisational context and sometimes even the methods to be considered a situation that does not happen in other professions. 5 ) It is true that universitisation of teacher education has been accompanied by the definition of a governmental policy outlining the organisation of programmes; the existence of a specific polic y for these programmes, besides the overall policy to be applied to all higher education, is unique in higher education in Portugal. The justification for this specific policy lies in the existence of a policy concerning the very content of basic and secon dary education. This specific teacher education policy is mainly made up of guidelines of a
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 26 qualitative nature, whose implementation, however, cannot be evaluated through classical checking methods characteristic of public administration. 6) Accreditatio n by Professional Orders is only meant, as aforementioned, to exempt graduates from some requirements of the professional certification process which is their responsibility. 7 ) Saying that it is a professional activity means here that teaching is not me re compliance with state guidance external to the teacher and school or the simple local execution of ready made and context insensitive pedagogical practices disseminated among teachers. Rather it demands th e elaboration in each specific sch ool context of classroom and school practices appropriate to the student achievement. The criteria for assessing teacher performance are n either compliance with external guidance nor adoption of good practices, but its suitability to the pursuit of learnin g by students in diverse concrete situation s T he preparation of teachers for their professional activity, which has to be research informed and, to some extent school work based, is therefore seen as teacher education rather than as teacher training Und erlying this distinction is the shift from vocationalisation to professionalisation of teacher qualifications. 8 ) The accreditation competence was later attributed to a department of education administration the Directorate of Human Resources in Educati on. But until now early 2004 this department has done nothing in the field of teacher education accreditation. 9 ) And the new government clarified, in 2003, that only universities can prepare teachers for lower secondary education. References Afons o, N. & Canrio, R. (2002). Estudos sobre a s ituao da f ormao i nicial de p rofessores Porto: Porto Editora Alarco, I. (2001). Professor investigador: Que sentido? Que formao? In B. Campos (Ed.) Formao p rofissional de professor e s no ensino superior ( pp. 21 30). Porto: Porto Editora Amaral, A. & Teixeira, P. (2000).The rise and fall of the private sector in Portuguese higher educati o n. Higher Education Policy 1 3 245 266 Amaral, A.., Correia, F. & Magalhes, A. (2002). Public an d private higher educ ation in Portugal: unintended effects of deregulation. European Journal of Education, 37 457 472 Andersson, C. (2002). What should govern teacher education? The impact of unclear governmental prescriptions: is there something more effective. European Jour nal of Teacher Education, 25 2, 251 262 Angus, D. (2001). Professionalism and the p ublic g ood: A b rief h istory of t eacher c ertification. Washington: Thomas Fordham Foundation Avalos, B.(2000).Policies for teacher education in developing countries Interna tional Journal of Educational Research. 33, 5, 457 474 Brennan, J. & Shah,T. (2000). Managing q uality in h igher e ducation: An i nternational p erspective on i nstitutional a ssessment and c hange Buckingham: OECE/ SRHE/Open University Press
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 27 Buchberger, F (200 0). Teacher education policies in the European Union: Critical analysis and identification of main issues. In B.Campos (Ed.), Teacher e ducation p olicies in the European Union (pp. 9 49 ) Lisbon : ENTE P Buchberger, F. & Beinaert Y.(1996). Recent development s in teacher education in the European Union In T. Sander F. Buchberger, A. Greaves & D. Kallos (Ed s .). Teacher e ducation in Europe: Evaluation and p erspectives ( pp. 395 405) Osnabruck : University of Osnabruck Buchberger, F., Campos, B., Kallos, D. & S tephenson, J. ( 2000). Green p aper on t eacher e ducation in Europe Umea : TNTEE Cameron, D. (1996). The role of teachers in establishing a quality assurance system P hi Delta Kappan, November, 225 227 Campbell, C. & van der Wende, M. (2000). International i nitiatives and t rends in q uality a ssurance for E uro p ean h igher e ducation Helsinki: ENQA Campos, B. (1979). Polticas de formao de professor e s ap s 25 de Abril de 1974. Biblos LV, 549 588 Campos, B. (1996). Teacher education in Portugal. In T. Sander F. Buchberger, A. Greaves & D. Kallos, E ds. Teacher e ducation in Europe: Evaluation and p erspectives ( pp. 297 322) Osnabruck : Universiry of Osnabruck Campos, B. (1999). Changes and recent trends of teacher education policy in Portugal In T. Sander (Ed. ), Teacher edu c ation in Europe i n the late 1990s: Evaluation and quality. Umea: TNTEE Campos B. (200 0 a ). Teacher education policies in Portugal. In B. Campos (Ed.), Teacher e ducation p olicies in the European Union ( pp. 225 242 ). Lisbon: ENTEP Campos, B. (Ed.), (2000 b ). Teacher e ducation p olicies in the European Union L isbon: ENTEP Campos, B. (2001 a) The role of postgraduate studies and research in teacher education in Portugal. In P O. Erixon, G M. Franberg & D. Kallos, The role of graduate and po s t graduate studies and research in teacher education reform policies in the European Union ( pp. 1 21 131 ) Umea: ENTEP Campos, B. (2001 b ). Professores num contexto de mudana: Profissionais do ensino em escolas autnomas. In R.Carneiro J. Caraa & M. So Pedro O f uturo da e ducao em Portugal ( Tomo IV pp. 287 311 ). Lisboa: Ministrio da Educao Campos, B. (2002). Desafios da universitarizao da fo rmao de professores. In J. Jimene M. Carracedo & M. Agusti Nuevos h orizontes en la f ormacion del p rofeso rado de Ciencias S ociales ( pp. 291 304) Palencia : Asociacin Universitaria de Profesores de Didactica de las Ciencias Sociales Campos, B. (200 3 ). Quem p ode e nsinar: Garantia de q ualidade das q ualificaes para a d ocncia. Porto: Porto Editora Canrio, R. (2001). A prtica profissional na formao de professores. In B. Campos (Ed.) Forma o p rofissional de professor e s no ensino superior ( pp. 31 45 ). Porto: Porto Editora
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 28 CNE (1996). Parecer n/96. In CNE, Pareceres e r ecomendaes : 1996 ( pp. 135 175). Lisbo a: Conselho Nacional de Educao(CNE) CNE (1999). Parecer n/99. In CNE, Pareceres e r ecomendaes : 1999 ( pp. 55 84). Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educao(CNE) CRE (2001) Towards a ccreditation s chemes for h igher e ducation in Europe? Gene ve : Aut h or. Cochr an Smith, M. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9 11 Committee accreditation of Dutch higher education (2001). Activate, achieve and advance La Hague: Ministry of Educat ion Danish Evaluation Institute (2003). Quality procedures in European higher education Helsinky : ENQA Darling Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A revi e w of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 8, 1 Darling Hammond, L.(2002). Research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to Teacher certification reconsidered. Education Policy Analysis Archives,,10, 36 Darling Hammond, L., Wise, A & Klein,S. (1995). A l icence to t each. Boulder: Westview Press Delandshere, G. & Petrosky, A. (2004). Political rationales stances of the standards based reform of teacher education in the U S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 1 15 Eaton, J. (2003). Is accreditation accountable? The continuing conversation betwe en accreditation and the Federal Government. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation Edwards, A. (2001). The role of research and scientifically based knowledge in teacher education. In P O. Erixon, G M. Franberg & D. Kallos, The role of gr aduate and pos t graduate studies and research in teacher education reform policies in the European Union ( pp. 19 32) Umea: ENTEP El Khawas, E. DePietro Jurand, R. & Holm Nielsen, L. (1998). Quality assurance in higher educations: Recent progress; challen ges ahead. Washington: World Bank European Commission (2003). Improving education of teachers and trainers: Working group progress report. Brussels: European Commission Eurydice (2002). The t eaching p rofession in E urope: Profile, t rends and c oncerns. Rep ort I: Initial t raining and t ransition to w orking l ife Brussels: European Commision Formosinho, J. (2002). Universitisation of teacher education in Portugal. In O Gassner (Ed.) Strategies of c hange in t eacher Education: European v iews (pp. 105 127) Feld kirch: ENTEP Grupo de Misso Acreditao da Formao de Professores (1998). Referenciais e a creditao da f ormao de p rofessores. Lisbo a : Minist rio da Educao Hmlinen, K., Haakstad, J., Kangasniemi, J., Lindeberg, T. & Sjolund, M. (2001). Quality a ssurance in the N ordic h igher e ducation: Accreditation like practices Helsinky: ENQA.
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 29 Hirsh, E., Koppich, J. & Knapp, M. (2001). Revisiting what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy INAFOP (2000 a). Deliberao n 1409/00 (Regulation of the accreditation process) Dirio da Repblica 2 Srie 16 de Novembro INAFOP(2000 b). Deliberao n 1488/00 (Standards for initial teacher education ) Dirio da Repblica 2 Srie 15 de Dezembro. INAFOP (2000 c ). Relatrio de Actividades de 1999 (Annual report) Lisb o a : INAFOP INAFOP(2001 a) Deliberao n 665/01(Guidelines for application for program accreditation) Dirio da Repblica 2 Srie 27 de Abr il. INAFOP (2001 b ). Relatrio de Actividades de 2000 (Annual repo r t). Lisbo a : INAFOP INAFOP(2002 a) Deliberao n 558/02 (Guidelines for the external review of teacher education programs) Dirio da Repblica 2 Srie 10 de Abril INAFOP (2002 b ). R elatrio de Actividades de 2001 (Annual report) Lisbo a : INAFOP Magalh es A. (2001). Higher education dilemmas and the qu est of identity: Politics, knowledge and education in an era of transition. Enchede: University of Twente Press Moon, B. (2003). A r etrospective view of the national case studies on i nstitutional approaches to teacher education. In B. Moon, L. Vlasceanu. & L. Barrows (Eds.) (2003). Institutional a pproaches to t eacher e ducation within h igher e ducation in Europe: Current m odels and n ew d evelopment s ( c h ap XV) Bucharest: U NESCO CEPES Moon,B., Vlasceanu, L. & Barrows, L. (Eds.) (2003). Institutional a pproaches to t eacher e ducation within h igher e ducation in Europe: Current m odels and n ew d evelopments. Bucharest: Unesco CEPES Morley, L. (2003). Quality and p ower in h igher e ducation. B uckingham:SRHE/O pen University Press M yers, R. Frankel, M., Reed, K. & Waugaman, P. (1998). Accreditation and a ccountab ility in A merican h igher e ducation Bonn: Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Resear ch and Technology N ational C ommission on T eaching and America `s Future (1996). What m atters m ost: Teaching for A merica`s f uture. New York: NCTAF O ECD (1999). Qualit y and internationalisation in higher education Paris: O ECD OECD /CERI (2003). Enhancing c onsumer protection in cross border higher education: Key issues related to quality assurance, accreditation and recognition of qualifications. Paris: OCDE Portugal( 1998) Decreto lei n 290/98 (Cr eation of the Institut e ) Dirio da Repblica I Srie A 17 de Setembro.
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 30 Portugal(1999) Decreto lei n 194/99 ( Creation of the s ystem) Dirio da Repblica I Srie A 7 de Junho. Portugal (2001a). Decreto lei n 240/01 (School teacher general profile) Dirio da Repblica I Srie A 30 de Agosto Portuga l (2001b) Decreto lei n 241/01 (Pre and primary school teacher profile s ) Dirio da Repblica I Srie A 30 de Agosto Randall, J. (2002). Quality assurance: meeting the needs of the user. Higher Education Quartely, 56 2, 188 203 Rodrigues, A., Estre la, M. & Esteves, M (2002). Sntese da investigao sobre formao inicial de professores em Portugal Porto:Porto Editora Reichert,S. & Tauch, C. (2003). Trends 2003: Progress towards the European h i gher e ducation a rea. Bologna four years after: Steps tow ard su s tainable reform of higher education in Europe. European University Association and European Commission Rhoades, G. & Sporn, B. (2002). Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43 355 390 Roldo, M. (2001). A formao como projecto : Do plano mosaico ao currculo como projecto de formao. In B. Campos (Ed.) Formao Profissional de professor e s no ensino superior ( pp. 6 20 ). Porto: Porto Editora Roth, R. (1996). Standards for certification, licensure and accreditation. In J. Sikula T. Battery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of r esearch on te acher e ducation ( 2 nd edition, pp. 242 278 ) New York: Mac Millan Sander,T. Buchberger, F., Greaves, A. & D. Kallos ( Ed s .) (1 996) Teacher e ducation in Europe: Evaluation and p erspectives Osnabruck : University of Osnabruck. Sander, T.(Ed.) (1999). Teacher e ducation in Europe in the l ate 1990s: Evaluation and q uality Umea: TNTEE Salgado Barros, A.(2001). Acreditao de cursos d e Engenharia Lisboa: O r dem dos Engenheiros So Pedro,M ., Santos,F. Baptista,M. & Correia, P. ( 2001 ) Uma leitura quantitativa do sistema educativo. In R.Carneiro, J. Caraa & M. So Pedro O f u turo da e ducao em Portugal Tomo I ( pp. 95 232). Lisb o a : Min ist rio da Educao Sebkova, H. (2002). Accreditation and quality assurance in Europe. Higher education in Europe XXVII, 3 239 247 Simo, J. Santos, S. & Costa, A. ( 2002). Ensino superior: Uma viso para a prxima dcada. Lisboa: Gradiva Stuart, J. & T atto, M. (2000). Designs for initial teacher preparation programs : An international view. International Journal of Educational Research 33 493 514 UNESCO (2002). First global forum on international quality assurance, accreditation and the recognition of qualifications in higher education: Final report Paris: UNESCO Van Damme, D. (2000). Internationalisation and quality assurance: towards worldwide accreditation? European Journal for Education Law and Policy, 4 1 20 V an der Wende, M. & Westerheijden, D. ( 2001). International aspects of quality assurance with a special focus on European higher education. Quality in Higher Education 7, 3, 233 2 45
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 31 Westerheijden, F. D. (2001). Ex oriente lux?: N ational and multiple accreditation in Europe after the fall of th e Wall and after Bologna. Quality in Higher Education 7 1, 65 75. Wilson, S. Floden,R. & Ferrini Mundi, J.(2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and rec omm e ndations. Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Zafeirak ou, A. (2002). In service training of teachers in the European Union: Exploring central issues. Metodika 3 253 278 About the A uthor Brtolo Campos University of Porto (Portugal) bcampos@ fpce .up.pt The author, PhD from the University of Louvain (Bel gium) is a professor at the University of Porto (Portugal) and a consultant of the European Commission in the field of teacher education. Co author of the Green Paper on Teacher Education in Europe (2000), he was the coordinator of the European Network on Teacher Education Policies (ENTEP) between 2000 and 2002. In Portugal he acted as education policy maker on several occasions, his most recent public position being that of President of the National Institute for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (I NAFOP) from 1998 until 2002.
Campos: Teacher Education Acreditation in Portugal 32 Education Policy Analysis Archives http:// epaa.asu.edu Editor: Gene V Glass, Arizona State University Production Assistant: Chris Murrell, Arizona St ate University General questions about appropriateness of topics or particular articles may be addressed to the Editor, Gene V Glass, email@example.com or reach h im at College of Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 2411. EPAA Editorial Board Michael W. Apple University of Wisconsin David C. Berliner Arizona State University Greg Camilli Rutgers University Linda Darling Hammond Stanford University Sherman Dorn University of South Florida Mark E. Fetler California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Gustavo E. Fischman Arizona State Univeristy Richard Garlikov Birmingham, Alabama Thomas F. Green Syracu se University Aimee Howley Ohio University Craig B. Howley Appalachia Educational Laboratory William Hunter University of Ontario Institute of Technology Patricia Fey Jarvis Seattle, Washington Daniel Kalls Ume University Benjamin Levin University of Manitoba Thomas Mauhs Pugh Green Mountain College Les McLean University of Toronto Heinrich Mintrop University of California, Berkeley Michele Moses Arizona State University Gary Orfield Harvard University Anthony G. Rud Jr. Purdue University Jay Paredes Scribner University of Missouri Michael Scriven Western Michigan University Lorrie A. Shepard University of Colo rado, Boulder Robert E. Stake University of Illinois UC Kevin Welner University of Colorado, Boulder Terrence G. Wiley Arizona State University John Willinsky University of British Columbia
Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 12 No. 73 33 Archivos Analticos de Polticas Educativas Associate Editors Gustavo E. Fi schman & Pablo Gentili Arizona State University & Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Founding Associate Editor for Spanish Language (1998 2003) Roberto Rodrguez Gmez Editorial Board Hugo Aboites Universidad Autnoma Metropolitana Xochimilco Adrin Acosta Universidad de Guadalajara Mxico Claudio Almonacid Avila Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educacin, Chile Dalila Andrade de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerai s, Belo Horizonte, Brasil Alejandra Birgin Ministerio de Educacin, Argentina Teresa Bracho Centro de Investigacin y Docencia Econmica CIDE Alejandro Canales Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico Ursula Casanova Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Sigfredo Chiroque Instituto de Pedagoga Popular, Per Erwin Epstein Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois Mariano Fernndez Enguita Universidad de Salamanca. Espaa Gaudncio Frigotto Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Rollin Kent Universidad Autnoma de Puebla. Puebla, Mxico Walter Kohan Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Roberto Leher Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Daniel C. Levy University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York Nilma Limo Gomes Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte Pia Lindquist Wong California State University, Sacramento, California Mara Loreto Egaa Programa Interdisciplinario de Investigacin en Educacin Mariano Narodowsk i Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina Iolanda de Oliveira Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brasil Grover Pango Foro Latinoamericano de Polticas Educativas, Per Vanilda Paiva Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Miguel Pereira Catedrat ico Universidad de Granada, Espaa Angel Ignacio Prez Gmez Universidad de Mlaga Mnica Pini Universidad Nacional de San Martin, Argentina Romualdo Portella do Oliveira Universidade de So Paulo Diana Rhoten Social Science Research Council, New York, New York Jos Gimeno Sacristn Universidad de Valencia, Espaa Daniel Schugurensky Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Canada Susan Street Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superi ores en Antropologia Social Occidente, Guadalajara, Mxico Nelly P. Stromquist University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California Daniel Suarez Laboratorio de Politicas Publicas Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Antonio Teodoro Universidade Lusfona Lisboa, Carlos A. Torres UCLA Jurjo Torres Santom Universidad de la Corua, Espaa