|USFDC Home | USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations||| RSS|
This item is only available as the following downloads:
An Evaluation of the Dopaminergic System s Response to a Natural Reinforcer: A Comparison Between Cocaine Pretreatme nt in Adolescent and Adult Rats By Briony Catlow A thesis submitted in partial fullfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Psychology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Cheryl Kirstein, Ph.D Member: Paula Bickford, Ph.D Member: Michael Brannick, Ph.D Member: Toru Shimizu, Ph.D Member: James Willott, Ph.D Date of Approval: 17 November, 2005 Keywords: dopamine, sucrose, microdialysis, neurochemistry, nucleus accumbens septi, development, adolescence Copyright 2005, Briony Catlow
i Table of Contents List of Figures ii Abstract iii Chapter One: Background Review 1-16 Theories of Addiction 2 The Mesolimbic System 5 An Animal Model: Behavioral Sensitization 9 Drug Use Initiated in Adolescence 11 Adolescence animal research 11 Purpose of the Study 14 Hypotheses and Objectives 16 Chapter Two: Manuscript 17-37 Introduction 17 Materials and Methods 23 Results 29 Discussion 32 List of References 38 Appendices 57 Appendix A: The Locomotor Effect of Repeated Cocaine 58 Figure 1A and Figure 1B Appendix B: Baseline Dopamine Levels After Drug 59 Pretreatment in Adolescence or Adulthood Figure 2 Appendix C: Dopamine Levels in Response to Natural 60 Reinforcers: Values and Area Under the Curve Figure 3A and Figure 3B Appendix D: Dopamine Levels in Response to Natural 61 Reinforcers: Percent Baseline Figure 4A and Figure 4B Appendix E: Liquid Consumption 62 Figure 5 Appendix F: Body Weight of Rats 63 Figure 6 Appendix G: Figure Legends 64
ii List of Figures Figure 1A. The Locomotor Effect of Repeated Cocaine: Total Distance Moved 58 Figure 1B. The Locomotor Effect of Repeated Cocaine: Stereotypy 58 Figure 2. Baseline Dopamine Leve ls After Drug Pretreatment in Adolescence or Adulthood 59 Figure 3A. Dopamine Levels in Response to Water: Values and Area Under the Curve 60 Figure 3B. Dopamine Levels in Response to Sucrose: Values and Area Under the Curve 60 Figure 4A. Dopamine Levels in Response to Water: Percent Baseline 61 Figure 4B. Dopamine Levels in Response to Sucrose: Percent Baseline 61 Figure 5. Amount of Natural Re inforcer Consumed During Microdialysis 62 Figure 6. Body Weight of Rats During Limited Access Water Treatment 63
iii An Evaluation of the Dopaminergic Systems Response to a Natural Reinforcer: A Comparison Between Cocaine Pretreatment in Adolescent and Adult Rats Briony Catlow ABSTRACT The long-term consequences of adolescent drug us e in shaping a network primed for addiction is an issu e of utmost importance. The use of cocaine during adolescent development could alter the norma l growth of the reward system and affect the adult mesolimbic system, however, there is scant literature aimed at finding out if animal s are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of drugs during adolescence. The present study investigated whether cocaine pretreatment in adolescent a nd adult rats produced differences in cocaine-induced neurochemi cal cross-sensitization to a naturally reinforcing substance in adulthood. To evaluate the responsivity of the mesolimbic system after repeated cocaine, sucrose was offe red during the dialysis procedure and dialysate was collected. A ll saline pretreated rats had significant increases in DA levels compared to baseline levels and there were no difference in the age of pretreatment. Rats pretreated with cocaine as adults also had significant
iv increases in DA levels after sucrose. In terestingly, sucrose intake significantly enhanced DA levels in cocaine pretreat ed adolescent rats. The results from this experiment clearly show that in rats pretreated with cocaine during adolescence there is an enhance response of the DAergic system in response to a naturally reinforcing substance therefore; cocaine exposure during adolescence results in persistent long term changes in the mesolimbic pathway. Future studies need to ascertain the underlying mechanisms and their role in the process of addiction.
1 Chapter 1: Background Review Approximately 50 million Americans have us ed cocaine at some time, and more that 6 million Americans use cocaine regularl y, making cocaine the most abused illicit psychostimulant of the 1990s in the United States (Das, 1993). However, cocaine is not a drug that is exclusively used by adults, in fact, the 2004 Monitoring the Future Study reported that 2.3% of high school seniors ha d used cocaine in the previous month (Johnson, 2005). Furthermore, the number of 12th graders who have used cocaine at some point in their lifet ime increased from 7.7% in 2003 to 8.1% in 2004 (Johnson, 2005). A 2004 survey carried out by the NIDA indicated that 3.4%, 5.4% and 8.1% of 8 th 10 th and 12 th graders respectively have used cocaine in their lifetime (Johnson, 2005). This increase in drug use is most likely due to higher availability of drugs, more so now than ever before. The problem of drug use in the United States today has driven the government to lead a war on drugs. This atte mpt to stop the sale and use of cocaine in the United States has not been successful in reducing the number of people using cocaine. The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) conducted surveys and found that between the years 1995 and 1998 Americans spent $38 billion on cocaine (Office of National Drug Cont rol Policy, 1999). The United States commits more money into fighting the war on drugs so that now the national drug control budget aimed at preventing drug use and abuse, as well as the sales of illegal drugs, has grown from $1.5 billion in 1981, to an estimated $11.7 billion dollars in 2004 (ONDCP, 2003). Over the
2 past 15 years, more than $250 billion has been spent to tackle the war on drugs (ONDCP, 2003); however, cocaine use continues to be a problem (ONDCP, 2003). Theories of Addiction At one time, people under the influence of drugs were viewed as criminals and mentally ill. However this view changed by the end of the nineteenth century as physicians identified drug users as lacking cont rol over drug use, and in need of medical attention. The term addiction ( addicere to sentence) became used to describe problems associated with repeatedly using drugs of abuse and to diagnose excessive drug use. Early theories of addiction focused on physical signs of withdrawal as a key factor in diagnosing a person with a drug addiction. Ad diction experts theorized that the addict was driven into drug relapse or the re-initiation of drug use in an attempt to stop the withdrawal syndrome and avoid the negative affects associated with drug use (Wise & Bozarth, 1982). This idea was termed the nega tive reinforcement model or the anhedonia hypothesis and proposes repeated exposure to drugs results in drug tolerance and withdrawal symptoms appear when drug use cease s. Tolerance refers to a decrease in the effect of a drug after repeated exposure so that the user has to increase the dose to get the effect produced by the original lower dose of the drug. The compensatory reactions to the primary effects of the drug are the withdrawal symptoms which produce an effect opposite of the effect of the drug (Trujillo & Akil, 1991; Zukin, Tempel, & Gardner, 1984). These symptoms are extremely unpleasan t and reducing these effects represents negative reinforcement (i.e., negative reinforcement is the reinforcement of behavior that stops an aversive stimulus). This model could well explai n the reasons why addicts
3 continue drug use; however it does not explain why ma ny addicts will voluntarily undergo withdrawal and endure the extremel y unpleasant withdrawal symptoms (e.g., 'cold-turkey' with heroin withdrawal) to re duce their drug tolerance so that they can resume drug use at a lower dose in order to maintain the costly habit. Interestingly, this theory failed to identify cocaine as an addictive drug since cocaine (an extremely addictive drug) does not produce a strong ph ysical dependency (i.e., tolerance and withdrawal syndrome). In cont rast, other drugs such as antid epressants, inhalers used to treat asthma which contained a -adrenergic agonist and many drugs used in the treatment of hypertension produce tolerance and withdrawal yet these drugs are not addictive (Hyman & Malenka, 2001). Taken t ogether, the negative reinforcement model is not an adequate model of addiction as it does not explain the w illingness of drug users to voluntarily undergo withdrawal, or that drug s used to treat medical conditions produce tolerance and withdrawal yet they are not addi ctive, and fails to explain drug relapse (see also Robinson & Berridge, 1993). The next attempt to explain addiction consisted of a positive reinforcement model. This model focused on addictive drugs as pos itive reinforcers and stated that humans continue to self administer these drugs b ecause of the pleasure and euphoria produced, not the avoidance of an unpleasant wit hdrawal syndrome (Stewart, De Wit, & Eikelboom, 1984; Wise & Bozarth, 1987; Wise, 1988) The neural correlate to euphoria was identified as dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens septi (NAcc) since drugs of abuse and natural reinforcers alike produce this effect (White, 1996). However, when Salamone (1996) reported that DA is released in the NAcc in response to aversive
4 stimuli as well as pleasurable stimuli, an obvious flaw in the theory of positive reinforcement was revealed (Salamone, 1996). In 1993 Robinson and Berridge proposed th at when a potentially addictive drug activates the mesolimbic DA system, this gi ves incentive salience to the sensory and environmental stimuli present at the time of drug use. Theref ore, when a person experiences these stimuli that were associated with prior drug use it triggers drug craving (i.e., the intense impulse to take the drug). This theory was termed the Incentive-Salience Theory of Addiction and is thought explai n the transition from casual drug use to compulsive drug seeking, taking and rela pse (Robinson & Berridge, 1993; Robinson & Berridge, 2000; Robinson & Berridge, 2001). The neural correlates of this theory involve a lasting sensitization of the mesolimbic DA sy stem to drugs and/or drug-related stimuli (Schultz, 1997; Schultz, Dayan, & Montague, 1997). The sens itivity of the mesolimibic DA system was appropriately termed neur al sensitization (Robinson & Berridge, 1993; Kalivas, Sorg, & Hooks, 1993). A highly sensitized mesoli mbic system results in stronger associations made between the drug and the drug-related cu es which strengthens the motivational salience of the stimuli and lead s to craving and drug re lapse. Variability in the ability of the system to recover (e.g., plastici ty) from the sensitization process could help to explain why some people use and abuse potentially addi ctive drugs at some point in their lives, however, not all people become addicts.
5 The Mesolimbic System Scientists have developed ways of studying drug abuse using animal models. More specifically, drugs of abuse are admi nistered to animals while the behavioral, neuroanatomical and neurochemical effects ar e studied in the labor atory. It is well established that when drugs of abuse are ad ministered to animals, these drugs act on a particular pathway within in brain (Rolls Rolls, Kelly, Shaw, Wood & Dale, 1974; Kelly & Iversen, 1976). This pathway has been term ed the reward or mesolimbic pathway. The mesolimbic system is in part comprised of DA neurons with in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) which project to the NAcc, se ptum, olfactory tubercle, amygdala, and piriform cortex (Dahlstrom et al., 1964). Th e NAcc consists of two subregions: the core and shell (Zahm & Brog, 1992; Zahm & Heim er, 1993; Zahm, 1999). Neuronal activity in the core of the NAcc is most commonly associated with locomotor activity (Boye, Grant, & Clarke, 2001) whereas increases in DA release in the NAcc shell is associated with salient stimuli and mo tivation (Kalivas & Duffy, 1995; Pontieri, Tanda, & Di Chiara, 1995). The NAcc receives afferent projections from the basolateral amygdala (Brog, Salyapongse, Deutch, & Zahm, 1993; Wright, Beijer, & Groenewegen, 1996; Zahm & Brog, 1992), the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Brog, Salyapongse, Deutch & Zahm, 1993; Zahm & Brog, 1992; McGeorge & Fau ll, 1989), and the hippocampus (Brog, Salyapongse, Deutch & Zahm, 1993; Groe newegen, Vermeulen-Van der Zee, te, & Witter, 1987; Zahm & Brog, 1992). When the mesolimbic system is activated, DA neurons in the VTA depolarize, leading to DA release in the NAcc (Hernandez & Hoebel, 1988).
6 The mesolimbic system is activated by na tural reinforcers (e.g., food, water, and the opportunity to mate) a nd drugs of abuse (e.g., cocaine, AMPH, methamphetamine, MDMA, nicotine and alcohol) and the effects of these substances are mediated in part by the NAcc (Smith & Schneider, 1988; Fibiger, Nomikos, Pfaus, & Damsma, 1992; Mark, Rada, Pothos, & Hoebel, 1992; Mitchell & Gratton, 1994). This mediation is due to DA release in the NAcc and is terminated ei ther by reuptake mechanisms or enzymatic degradation via monoamine oxidase (MAO) or catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) (Dyck, 1978; Axelrod, 1971). The reuptake system whose main component is the presynaptic membrane protein DA-transporte r (DAT) functions to decrease DA in the extracellular space (Lishajko, 1969; Hitri, Hurd, Wyatt, & Deutsch, 1994). When DA is in the synapse, it binds to the DAT and is transported back into the presynaptic neuron where it is either repackaged into vesicl es or broken down by MAO (Karoum, Chrapusta, Brinjak, Hitri, & Wyatt, 1994). When cocain e is administered it disrupts the system because it has a high affinity for the DAT and competitively binds to the DAT (Pothos & Sulzer, 1998). This prevents the reuptake of DA into the presynaptic neuron, resulting in excess DA in the synapse (Koob, 1992a; Koob, 1992b). The excess DA in the synapse activates GABAergic medium spiny neurons which project to the VTA, Ventral Pallidum (VP) and lateral hypothalamus (LH) (Wise & Bozarth, 1984; Wise & Bozarth, 1985). Together, the activation of the mesolimbic pathway results in appetite suppression, euphoria and hyperactivity.
7 Natural Reinforcers A reinforcer is defined as an event which increases the probability of a operant or instrumental response upon which it is cont ingent (Skinner, 1966). Natural reinforcers such as food, water, and sex act on the reward pathway and the effects are mediated in part by DA in the NAcc (Smith & Schneider, 1988; Fibiger, Nomikos, Pfaus, & Damsma, 1992; Mark, Rada, Pothos, & Hoebel, 1992; Mi tchell & Gratton, 1994; Everitt & Wolf, 2002). DA is also released into the NAcc when a male rat is presented with a receptive female, and remains elevated throughout the display of sexual behavior (Pfaus, Damsma, Nomikos, Wenkstern, Blaha, & Phillips, 1990; Pfaus & Phillips, 1991; Damsma, Pfaus, Wenkstern, Phillips, & Fibiger, 1992; Wenk stern, Pfaus, & Fibiger, 1993; Becker, Rudick, & Jenkins, 2001). In an environmen t previously paired with sexual activity, male (Mehrara & Baum, 1990) and female (Old enburger, Everitt, & de Jonge, 1992) rats show a conditioned place preference (CPP) for that environment. Microdialysis studies have shown that natural reinforcers like sucrose (Hajnal & Norgren, 2001; Hajnal, Smith, & Norgren, 2004) and water (Guion & Kirstein, 2001) increase DA in the shell region of the NAcc. Furthermore, licking sucros e solutions increases DA in NAcc in a concentration dependent manner and this sucr ose-induced increase in DA is greater than water (Hajnal, Smith, & Norgren, 2004). La boratory animals can be trained to selfadminister drugs of abuse and natural reinfo rcers which act on the mesolimbic pathway. Male rats will lever-press in order to gain ac cess to a female rat in estrus (Korczynski, Beck, & Bialy, 1989). Animals will lever-press for electrical stimulation dire ctly to the NAcc and for natural reinforcers such as food or water, furt hermore, this responding is
8 rapidly extinguished if a DA antagonist (spiroperidol) is administered (Rolls, Rolls, Kelly, Shaw, Wood & Dale, 1974). In addition, the anticipation alone of a f ood reward activates accumbal DA. DA is also released in response to cues which sign al the opportunity to respond for sucrose (in animals trained in response-dependent sucr ose delivery) (Roitman, Stuber, Phillips, Wightman & Carelli, 2004). Increases in a ccumbal DA have been observed prior to the self-administration of food when lever-pressi ng for a food reward (Kiyatkin & Gratton, 1994). In addition, when a neutral stimulus su ch as a light is paired with a natural reinforcer (food), DA neurons in the VTA increase in firi ng rate before, and during training (Ljungberg, Apicella, & Schultz, 1992) de monstrating the role of this pathway in motivated behavior. The Effects of Cocaine Cocaine is a psychostimulant and its eff ects include the suppression of hunger and fatigue, and inducing euphoria in humans. In rodents, cocaine decreases food consumption, increases motor activity, st imulates operant behaviors, enhances conditioned responding and produces place pref erence (Mucha, van der, O'Shaughnessy, & Bucenieks, 1982). The main effect of cocaine is that it increases in the amount of available monoamine transmitters at synaps es. Specifically, cocaine increases the amount of DA, serotonin (5-HT) and norepine phrine (NE) at synaps es by binding to the presynaptic transporter protein and blocking their reuptake (Ritz, Cone, & Kuhar, 1990). However, DA has been shown to be the critical transmitter i nvolved in the acute reinforcing effects of cocai ne (Ettenberg, Pettit, Bloom & Koob, 1982). Studies using
9 self-administration have generated evidence implicating the mesolimbic DA system with the acute reinforcing effects of cocaine. E ttenberg and colleagues (1982) demonstrated that administering a low dose of a DA recep tor antagonist, injected both locally and systemically blocks cocai ne self-administration. The functions of the NAcc have been studied extensively and reveal it to be more than a mere mediator of reward. Mogens on, Jones & Yim (1980) proposed that the NAcc acts as an interface between motivational and mo tor processes. The NAcc has also been shown to mediate associative learning (Di Chiara, 1999). Furthermore, Schultz, Dayan & Montague (1997) demonstrated that the NA cc is involved in the prediction of drug reward, a phenomena termed expectancy (Schultz, Dayan, & Montague, 1997). As was mentioned earlier, natural reinforcers lik e food act on the mesolimbic pathway and in fact, even stimuli related to food elicit DA increases within the NAcc (Blackburn, Phillips & Fibiger, 1987; Blackburn, Phillips, Jakubovic & Fibiger, 1989). Increases in accumbal DA have been observed prior to th e self-administration of food when leverpressing for a food reward (Kiyatkin & Gratto n, 1994). The effects of drug expectancy have been shown to be a critical motivating fo rce in the self-administration of many drugs of abuse. An Animal Model: Behavioral Sensitization The acute administration of psychostimulants produces an increase in locomotor activity and stereotyped behavi or, behaviors that are tho ught to be mediated by the mesolimbic and nigrostraital DA pathways ( Fontana, Post, Weiss & Pert, 1993a; Fontana, Post & Pert, 1993b). Repeated expo sure to cocaine results in an enhanced
10 behavioral response to a subsequent drug challenge (Kalivas & Duffy, 1993; Kalivas, Sorg & Hooks, 1993). This effect, termed behavioral sensitization, has been studied extensively in adult animal models and has been implicated in the process of addiction and drug craving (Stewart & Badiani, 1993; Robinson & Berridge, 1993). Behavioral sensitization can be elicited by direct DA agonists (apomor phine, quinpirole) and markedly by psychostimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine (Stewart & Badiani 1993; Post, Lockfeld, Squillac & Contel, 1981) and has been implicated in the transition from casual drug use to addiction (Robinson & Berridge, 1993). It is thought that the long-lasting nature of behavior al sensitization could be at tributed to the persistent enhanced responsiveness of neural inputs to NAcc, such as DAergic neurons from the VTA and glutamatergic (Glu) neurons from the PFC and basolateral amygdala (Pierce & Kalivas, 1997; White & Kalivas, 1998; Vanderschuren & Kalivas, 2000). A significant aspect of drug abuse involves antic ipating a drug reward as a result of prior experience with that drug. Severa l laboratories have shown that behavioral sensitization is not a phenomena produced by th e drug alone, as it is influenced by the environment in which drug administration occurred. This effect, termed contextdependent sensitization enhances cocaine-i nduced locomotor activity compared to animals where the drug was not paired with an environmental context (Fontana, Post, & Pert, 1993; Brown & Fibiger, 1992). However, the results are mixed with data on DA release in contextually conditioned sensitization. Brow n and colleagues (1992) found no difference in DA release between contextdependent and context-independent drug treated groups, whereas Fontana and colleague s (1993) found increases in DA levels as a result of the cocaine-paired environment. It is clear that expectancy is accompanied by
11 DA increases in the NAcc, however, mixed results suggest that in addition to the mesolimbic DAergic system there may be additional processes underlying conditioned drug sensitization. Animals sensitized to a particular drug s how increases in locomotor activity after the administration of a different drug of th e same class. This phenomenon is known as cross-sensitization and has been shown with many drugs of abuse and more recently with natural reinforcers (Avena & Hoebel, 2003a; Avena & Hoebel, 2003b; Pierce & Kalivas, 1995; Kalivas & Weber, 1988; Schenk, Snow & Horger, 1991; Greenberg & Segal, 1985). Animals on a high sugar diet show greater behavioral sensitization when administered AMPH (Avena & Hoebel, 2003a) and cocaine (Gosnell, 2005) than animals on control diet. Furthermore, animals who show behavioral sensitization to AMPH exhibit sugar-induced hy peractivity (AMPH-sugar cross-se nsitization) (Avena & Hoebel, 2003b). Evidence for cross-sensitization is particularly interes ting concerning the efficacy of natural reinforcers in a person who has used or abused cocaine (Majewska, 1996). Drug Use Initiated in Adolescence Most research in the ar ea of drug abuse has been conducted on adult animals; however, the development of drug addictio n commonly occurs in adolescence as mentioned earlier. There is substantial ri sk among these individua ls of developing a cocaine addiction and mortality rates associ ated with its use are high (Gold, Semlitz, Dackis, & Extein, 1985; Gold, Galanter & Stimmel, 1986; Miller, Gold & Millman, 1989). Because human drug use is frequently in itiated during adolescence, it is important
12 to understand the effects of cocaine use duri ng the periadolescent period, with specific attention directed towards the potential ch anges in reinforcement mechanisms as a consequence of adolescent us e. Alterations in responsivity of these mechanisms have significant implications not only for continued addiction into adulthood, but also in the efficacy of a variety of reinforcers, given this common neurochemical pathway (Blackburn et al., 1987; Blackbur n et al., 1989; Salamone, 1996). Adolescence Animal Research In humans, adolescence is a period of transition that ranges from childhood to adulthood. In rats, adolescence is thought to be encompassed by the time period from postnatal day (PND) 20 to PND 55 (Odell et al., 1976; Ojeda et al., 1986 ). Some authors have further categorized it into three phases: early (prepubescent animals, PND 21 to 34), mid (periadolescent, PND 34-46) and late adolescence (young adult, PND 46-59) (Tirelli, Laviola, & Adriani, 2003). Adolescence is a critical time period in which brain maturation and development take place. One importance characteristic of the adolescent brain is the extensive over production and pruning of synapses (Huttenloc her, 1984; Rakic et al., 1994). This over production and pruning includes cholinergic, DAergic, serotonergic, GABAergic and adrenergic receptors (Lidow et al., 1991; Lidow et al., 1992). Additionally, the ontogenetic profile of DA receptors expression ha s been characterized in the rat striatum. There is a constant increase in DA receptor densities throughout development which peak at PND 28-30 (Murrin et al., 1986 ; Zeng et al., 1988; Murrin et al., 1990; Rao et al.,
13 1991). Further evidence shows that striatal DA receptors are over-expressed before the onset of puberty, peak at PND 40 and then decr ease to adult levels (Teicher, Andersen, & Hostetter, Jr., 1995; Andersen et al., 2000). It has been found that DAT expression is highest during adolescence in human striatum (Meng et al., 1999). However animal studies revealed that DAT expression in NAcc and striatum increases with age peaking at PND 60 (Tarazi et al., 1998; Coulter et al., 1997). Studies have shown that adolescent rats are unique in base line behavior and reactivity to psychostimulants compared to animals of other ages. Adolescent animals were shown to be hyperactive compared to younger or older animals. Specifically, adolescents were more active in an open field, hole-poked more a nd engaged in more play behavior than younger and older rats (Spear & Brake, 1983). Furthermore, adolescent female rats were more active than males; however, this effect was reduced when animals were not handled post-weaning (Bronstein, Wol koff, & Levine, 1975). A recent study showed that adolescent rats showed more cocaine-induced locomotor activity compared to adult ra ts (Catlow & Kirstein, 2005). However, adolescent animals have also been shown to respond less to the locomotor activating eff ects of acute cocaine than juvenile animals (Spear & Brick, 1979) and appeared unresponsive to amphetamine (AMPH) compared to both younger and olde r animals (Lanier & Isaacson, 1977). The latter finding was based on five-minutes of amphetamine induced locomotor activity, when such an effect can last hours. Hand ling rats prior to cocaine administration can affect locomotor activity, in fact, adolescent rats showed significantly greater cocaineinduced locomotor activity compared to adults rats when rats were handled prior to drug administration (Maldonado & Kirstein, 2005). More recently, studies have found that
14 after repeated cocaine, adolescent rats sensiti ze to the locomotor effects of cocaine to a lesser degree than juvenile (Snyder, Katovi c, & Spear, 1998) and adult rats (Laviola, Wood, Kuhn, Francis, & Spear, 1995). Laviola and colleague s (1995) demonstrated not only that periadolescent rats exhibit cocaine-i nduced behavioral se nsitization, but that their sensitization profile is different from adult animals. More specifically, the adult animals exhibited stereotypy a result of cocai ne-induced sensitization and the adolescent animals did not. The authors attribute this eff ect to adolescent hyposensitivity of the DAergic system. In contrast, adolescen t mice show an enhanced AMPH-induced locomotor sensitization profile compared to adults (Adriani, Chiarotti, & Laviola, 1998). Furthermore, adolescent rats show prominen t sensitization of AMPH-induced striatal DA release where adults do not (Laviola, Pascuc ci, & Pieretti, 2001). The behavioral data presented above is mixed, in that both hyperand hyposensitivity are observed as a result of a DA agonist. It is well known that drugs of abuse have a direct effect on the DAergic system (Koob & Nestler, 1997). It is also know n that periadol escent rats have less basal DA in the striatum (Andersen & Gazzara, 1993) and the NAcc (Philpot & Kirstein, 1999). Given the above information it is im portant to consider the behavioral and biological effects that cocaine has on the adolescent animal and how this potent drug influences the development and efficacy of the mesolimbic system. Purpose of the Study The long-term consequences of adolescen t drug use in shaping a network primed for addiction is an issue of utmost importance. The use of cocaine during adolescent development likely alters the normal grow th of this system and affects the adult
15 mesolimbic system, however, there is scant literature aimed at findi ng out if animals are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of drugs during adolescence. Thus, the present study investigated whether cocaine pretreatme nt in adolescent and adult rats produced differences in cocaine-induced neurochemical cross-sensitization in adulthood. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cocaine exposure during adolescence on the adult rat mesolimbic syst em. More specifically, after a period of cocaine pretreatment and withdrawal, basal DA levels in the NAcc were evaluated. The second goal was to investigate whether cocaine pretreatment in adolescent and adult rats produced differences in DAergic responsivity to a na tural reinforcer in both groups when tested in adulthood. In this case sucrose or water was offered during the dialysis procedure and DA levels monitored. It was hypothesized that rats pretreated with cocaine as adults would cross-sensitize to su crose but that adolescent pretreated rats would show a different profile. The rats pretreated with cocaine as adolescents may in fact be less responsive to the na tural reinforcer as a result of the irreversible effects of cocaine administration on the developing brain The results from these experiments outlined in the materials and methods sectio n provide information pertaining to the longterm effects of cocaine use during adolescent development on the functioning and responsivity of the adult meso limbic system. The neural alterations induced by cocaine during the adolescent period could cause ch anges in basal DA within NAcc and drive physiological craving and drug seeking behavior s. This could be an important mechanism that ultimately leads to the re-initiation of drug use.
16 Objectives and Hypotheses 1. Determining if cocaine pretreatment in adolescent and adult rats produces different basal DA levels in adulthood. Hypothesis 1: Cocaine exposure during adolescence alters normal development of the mesolimbic system le ading to decrease in basal tone of DA. 2. Determining if a natural reinforcer (sucrose) produces an increase in accumbal DA and if this effect is di minished in rats pretreated with cocaine as adolescents. Hypothesis 2: Sucrose produces an in crease in DA release in the NAcc (cross-sensitization) in rats pretreated as adults, however, rats pretreated with cocaine as adolescents show a dulled DA responsivity to sucrose.
17 Chapter 2: Manuscript Introduction Very little is know about how drugs of abuse alter normal brain development and change the efficacy of natural reinforcers in adulthood. Many teenagers experiment with drugs, in fact, a 2004 survey carried out by the NIDA indicated that 21.5%, 39.8% and 51.1% of 8 th 10 th and 12 th graders respectively have used an illicit drug in their lifetime. These statistics translate to an estimated 16 million out of a possible 33.6 million adolescents in the US (U.S Census Bureau, 2004). Given that drug use frequently occurs during adolescence it is important to understand the long term effects of cocaine use (and other drugs of abuse) during the adolescen t period because drug use during adolescence may compromise the circuitry primed for addiction. The presen t study investigated whether cocaine pretreatment in adolescent a nd adult rats produced differences in basal tone and cocaine-induced neurochemical crosssensitization to a natural reinforcer in adulthood. Cocaine is a psychostimulant which act s by blocking the reuptake of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) in the mesolimbic pathway and elsewhere (Miller et al., 1989). Researchers studying the neurobiological mechanisms of drugs of abuse have shown that the mesolimb ic pathway (reward system) is activated by cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The me solimbic system consists of dopaminergic (DAergic) inputs from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) which proj ects to several brain regions including the nucleus accumbens sep ti (NAcc), hippocampus, prefrontal cortex
18 (PFC), amygdala, septum, olf actory bulb and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (Dahlstrom & Fuxe, 1964). DA is also involved in attention and play s a role in operant or instrumental conditioning. An event that increases the pr obability of an operant or instrumental response upon which it is contingent is cal led a reinforcer (Skinner, 1966). Natural reinforcers such as food, water, and the opportunity to mate increase activity of the mesolimbic pathway, and these effects are medi ated in part by DA in the NAcc (Smith & Schneider, 1988; Fibiger, Nomikos, Pfaus, & Damsma, 1992; Mar k, Rada, Pothos, & Hoebel, 1992; Mitchell & Gratt on, 1994; Everitt & Wolf, 2002). DA is also released into the NAcc when a male rat is presented with a receptive female, and remains elevated throughout the display of sexual behavior (Pfaus et al., 19 90; Pfaus & Phillips, 1991; Damsma, Pfaus, Wenkstern, Phillips, & Fibi ger, 1992; Wenkstern, Pfaus, & Fibiger, 1993; Becker, Rudick, & Jenkins 2001). Microdialysis studies have shown that natural reinforcers like sucrose (Hajnal & Norgre n, 2001; Hajnal, Smith, & Norgren, 2004) and water (Guion & Kirstein, 2001) increase DA in the shell region of the NAcc. Furthermore, licking sucrose solutions in creases DA in NAcc in a concentration dependent manner and this sucrose-induced incr ease in DA is greater than water (Hajnal, Smith, & Norgren, 2004). Laboratory animals can be trained to self-administer drugs of abuse and natural reinforcers, all increasing activity of the mesolimbic pathway. Animals will lever-press for electrical stimulation directly to the NAcc and for natural reinforcers such as food or water, furthermore, this responding is rapidly extinguished if a DA antagonist (spiroperidol) is admini stered (Rolls et al., 1974).
19 In addition, the an ticipation of a food reward in creases accumbal DA. DA is released in response to cues which signal the opportunity to respond for sucrose in animals trained in response-dependent sucr ose delivery (Roitman, Stuber, Phillips, Wightman, & Carelli, 2004). In creases in accumbal DA have been observed prior to the self-administration of food when lever-pressi ng for a food reward (Kiyatkin & Gratton, 1994). In addition, when a neutral stimulus su ch as a light is paired with a natural reinforcer (food), DA neurons in the VTA increase in firi ng rate before, and during training (Roitman, Stuber, Phillips, Wightma n, & Carelli, 2004; Ljungberg, Apicella, & Schultz, 1992) demonstrating that this pa thway is involved in motivated behaviors. An animal model based on psychostimulant-induced pa ranoia and psychosis in humans has been developed. The administra tion of cocaine (and other psychostimulants) produces an increase in locomotor activity a nd stereotyped behavior behaviors that are thought to be mediated by the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal DA pathways (Fontana, Post, Weiss, & Pert, 1993). Repeated exposure to cocaine results in an e nhanced behavioral response to a subsequent drug challenge (Ka livas & Duffy, 1989). This effect, termed behavioral sensitization, has been studied extensively in adult animal models and has been implicated in the pro cess of addiction and drug crav ing (Stewart & Badiani, 1993; Robinson & Berridge, 1993). Be havioral sensitization can be generated by direct DA agonists (e.g., apomorphine, quinpirole) and markedly by psychostimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine (AMPH) (Stewart et al., 1993; Post, Lockfeld, Squillace, & Contel, 1981) and has been implicated in the transition from casual drug use to addiction (Robinson & Berridge, 1993). It is thought that the long-lasting nature of behavioral sensitization could be attributed to the pe rsistent enhanced responsiveness of neural
20 inputs to NAcc, such as DAergic neurons fr om the VTA and glutamatergic (Glu) neurons from the PFC and basolateral amygdala (Pie rce & Kalivas, 1997; Wh ite & Kalivas, 1998; Vanderschuren & Kalivas, 2000). Animals sensitized to a particular drug s how increases in locomotor activity after the administration of a different drug of th e same class. This phenomenon is known as cross-sensitization and has been shown with many drugs of abuse and more recently with natural reinforcers (Avena & Hoebel, 2003a; Avena & Hoebel, 2003b; Pierce & Kalivas, 1995; Kalivas & Weber, 1988; Schenk, Snow & Horger, 1991; Greenberg & Segal, 1985). Animals on a high sugar diet show greater behavioral sensitization when administered AMPH (Avena et al., 2003a) a nd cocaine (Gosnell, 2005) than animals on control diet (e.g., typical rat chow). Fu rthermore, animals who show behavioral sensitization to AMPH exhibit sugarinduced hyperactivity (AMPH-sugar crosssensitization) (Avena et al., 2003b). Evidence for cross-sensitization is particularly interesting concerning the efficacy of natural reinforcers in a person who has used or abused cocaine (Majewska, 1996). To date, most studies investigating the effects of psychostimulants on the mesolimbic system have been undertaken usin g adult rats. Howeve r, the initiation of drug use happens most frequently during ad olescence, a time period in which brain maturation and development take place (for review see Spear, 2000). In humans, adolescence is a period of transition that ranges from childhood to adulthood. In rats, adolescence is thought to be encompassed by the time period from approximately postnatal day (PND) 20 to PND 55 (Odell & Swerdloff, 1976; Ojeda, Urbanski, & Ahmed, 1986). Some authors have further categorized it into three phases: early
21 (prepubescent animals, PND 21 to 34), mid (periadolescent, PND 34-46) and late adolescence (young adult, PND 46-59) (T irelli, Laviola, & Adriani, 2003). During the adolescent period neuronal circuits continue to change and develop. One important characteristic of the adolescent brai n is the extensiv e overproduction and pruning of synapses (Huttenlocher, 1984; Raki c, Bourgeois, & Goldman-Rakic, 1994). This overproduction and pruning includes cholinergic, DAergic serotonergic, GABAergic and adrenergic receptors (Lidow Goldman-Rakic, & Rakic, 1991; Lidow & Rakic, 1992). Additionally, the ontogenetic pr ofile of DA receptor expression has been characterized in the rat striatum. There is a constant increase in DA receptor densities throughout development which peak at a bout PND 28-30 (Murrin & Zeng, 1986; Zeng, Hyttel, & Murrin, 1988; Murrin & Zeng, 1990; Ra o, Molinoff, & Joyce, 1991). Further evidence shows that striatal DA receptors ar e overexpressed before the onset of puberty, peak at around PND 40 and then decrease to adult levels (Teicher, Andersen, & Hostetter, Jr., 1995; Andersen, Thompson, Ruts tein, Hostetter, & Teicher, 2000). It has been found that DA transporter (DAT) expressi on is highest during adolescence in human striatum (Meng, Ozawa, Itoh, & Takashima, 1999). However, animal studies revealed that DAT expression in NAcc and striatum increases with age peaking at PND 60 (Tarazi, Tomasini, & Baldessarini, 1998; Coulter, Happe, & Murrin, 1997). From the evidence provided above it is clear that developmental changes occur during the adolescent period, however, it is presentl y unknown how drugs of abuse alter this preprogrammed development. Investigating both the short and long-term effects of adolescent drug use is an issue of utmost importance because the use of cocaine during adolescence may alter the
22 mesolimbic pathway. There is scant literature aimed at finding out if animals are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of drugs during adolescenc e. Therefore, the present study investigated whether cocaine pretreatme nt in adolescent and adult rats produced differences in basal tone and responsivity of the DAergic system to a natural reinforcer (i.e., sucrose) in adulthood. The rats pretreat ed with cocaine as adolescents may in fact be less responsive to the natural reinforcer as a result of the lasting effects of cocaine administration on the developing brain.
23 Materials and Methods Subjects Subjects consisted of Sprague-Dawley ra ts derived from established breeding pairs in the laboratory at the University of S outh Florida (Tampa, FL). Date of birth was designated as postnatal day (PND) 0. Litters contained 8-10 pups after culling. No more that one pup per litter was placed in a given treatment condition. The pups remained with the dam and littermates until weaning. Animals were weaned on PND 21 and housed with their same sex littermates with free acce ss to food and water and maintained in a temperature and humidity controlled room on a 12-hour light/dark cycl e with lights on at 7:00 A.M. Animals were pretreated at one of two ages: adolescent (PND 35-44) or adult (PND 70-79), withdrawn, then challenged as adults (PND 65 and PND 100). All National Institutes for Health (NIH) guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals were followed (National Institutes of Health, 1986). Procedure Animals were handled for 3 days prior to pretreatment for 5 minutes per day. Drug pretreatment consisted of the administ ration of 20 mg/kg coca ine or sa line (i.p.) once daily for a period of 10 days from PND 35-44 and PND 70-79. Following drug exposure animals were drug free for a period of 21 days from the ages: PND 45-65 and PND 80-100. On PND 58 or 93 (during wi thdrawal) animals had a guide cannula surgically implanted and were allowed 1 week to recover before microdialysis on either PND 65 or PND 100.
24 In order to train the rats to drink duri ng the microdialysis procedure, four days before microdialysis, rats were put on a limited access water schedule described as follows. At 1000 hours the rats were trans ported to the laboratory, and placed in the Raturn apparatus (Bioanalytical Systems, West Lafayette, Indiana) where they were able to access water for a period of 20 minutes. All Raturn bowls ha d a cotton ball attached to the top, immediately before the presentation of drink, 0.5 ml banana odor was placed on the cotton ball that was taped to the top of the Raturn bo wl. After the conditioning to drink in the apparatus, the rats were placed b ack in their home cages and returned to the colony room. Animals had no access to water in their home cages. In Vivo microdialysis was performed 20 days af ter the last injection. All animals were adults (PND 65 or 100) on microdialysis testing day. This held the period of withdrawal constant across ages. Behavior Locomotor Activity was recorded on days 1, 5 and 10 of the pret reatment period. On these days rats were injected and placed in the locomotor activity apparatus for a total of 45 minutes. After a 15-minute habitua tion period, subjects received a single i.p. injection of 20 mg/kg cocaine or saline and we re monitored for 30 minutes post-injection. On all other days rats were injected in th eir home cages and then returned to the colony room.
25 Apparatus The locomotor activity apparatus consiste d of a circular table with a black Plexiglas surface on which a white Plexiglas circular barrier (diameter = 101 cm, height = 45.72 cm) was placed. A camera connected to analysis software located above the apparatus recorded locomotor activity. The apparatus was located in a room away from the animal colony and the door remained clos ed during all testing sessions. Activity was recorded and analyzed using Ethovision Video Tracking System created by Noldus. This software tracked and recorded the Total Distance Moved (TDM) (cm) of each animal during the testing session. For the conditioning phase and the microdialysis procedure, animals were placed in a Raturn System (see above). The Raturn System consists of a large plastic round bottom bowl (14 x 16). For the conditioning phase a cotton ball with banana odor was attached to the top of the Ratu rn system. For the microdialysis procedure, the animal was placed inside the apparatus the night be fore the microdialysis experiment, and microdialysis probe was inserted. Rats were then able to habituate to the environment overnight. Surgical Procedures and In Vivo Microdialysis Animals were anesthetized on either PND 58 or 93 using a ketamine/xylazine cocktail (1.0 and 0.15 mg/kg/ip). An incisi on was made over the skull and the rat was mounted on the stereotaxic instrument for surg ery. Four holes were drilled in the skull (three for skull screws and one for the guide cannula). A 21-gauge stainless-steel guide cannula (Plastics One) was inserted aimed at the NAcc shell (Anterior/Posterior: +1.2
26 mm, Lateral: 0.8 mm, and Ventra l: 2.6 mm relative to bregma and the surface of the level skull) and affixed to the skull with cranioplas t. Animals were returned to their homecage for a 1 week recovery period (during whic h conditioning occurred). The day before dialysis, the probe was inse rted through the guide cannula and protruded 4 mm from the guide cannula shaft to reach the NAcc shell. Rats were then placed in a BAS Raturn system bowl overnight for habituation. Inle t tubing was attached to a 2.5 ml Hamilton syringe mounted on a WPI syringe pump (sp3201w) set to a flow rate of 0.1 l/min overnight. In vivo microdialysis probes with 2 mm me mbrane tips (o.d. 512; MW cutoff 13 kDA) were perfused continuously with ar tificial cerebrospinal fluid (136 mM NaCl, 3.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl 2 1.0 mM MgCl 2 10.0 mM NaHCO 3 at pH=7.4) for twelve hours prior to the start of sampling. On eith er PND 65 or 100, dialysates were collected at a flow rate of 1.0 l/min in ten-minute intervals from the probe outlet silica into tubes containing 2.0 l of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) a nd immediately frozen. Following four baseline samples, animals were allo wed access to either water or 0.3 M sucrose solution and sampling continued for an addi tional 120 minutes. Dialysate samples (12 l) were stored at C until analyzed. Neurochemical Analysis Analysis of dialysate samples was pe rformed with a reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography system (BAS) coupled to an electrochemical detector (HPLC-EC) set to oxidize catecholamin es (650 mV). An amperometric detector with a LC-4C carbon working electrode referen ced to an Ag/AgCl electrode was used. Neurochemical analyses include the detecti on of DA. The mobile phase consisted of
27 0.04 M sodium acetate, 0.01 M citric acid, 0.05 mM sodium octyl sulfate, 20.911 M disodium EDTA, 0.013 M NaCl and 10% v/v meth anol (pH 4.5) set at a flow rate of 50 l/min. Samples (6 l) were injected onto a C-18 micr obore column for peak separation. Data were recorded and quantified by Rain in Dynamax Software on a Power Macintosh 8500/120. Histology Following probe removal, rats were euthanized via CO inhalation. Brains were removed and frozen in 2-methylbutane (-40 C) and stored at C. Brains were sliced into 40 m sections, mounted on slides and stained with cresyl violet. Probe placements were verified histologically fo r placement in the NAcc shell. Design and Analysis DA levels were obtained after collect ing Dialysate for a time period of 160 minutes. Baseline (BL) samples were co llected during the first 40 minutes of microdialysis. The subsequent samples (2 hour s) were all taken after the presentation of the natural reinforcer. In order to assess th e increase in DA levels after the presentation of the natural reinforcer, DA levels were converted to Area Under the Curve (AUC) using Prism software. Separate analyses were pe rformed with total distance moved (TDM), stereotypy, baseline (BL) DA, AUC DA, DA % baseline, body weight and liquid consumption as dependant measures. Locomotor activity wa s measured using TDM and stereotypy as dependent measures. Both TDM and Stereoty py were analyzed using a 2 (Age: PND 35,
28 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA with da y (1,5,10) as the repeated measure. BL DA levels were analyzed with a 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA. Both DA AUC levels an d liquid consumption (ml) were analyzed with a 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) X 2 (Natural reinforcer: water, sucrose) ANOVA. DA % baseline was analyzed using a 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) X 2 (Natural Reinforcer: Water, 0.3M Sucrose) ANOVA with time (0-160 minutes) as a repeated measure. Body wei ght (g) was measured each day during limited access water and analyzed using a 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA with day (4) as a repeated measure. Subsequent analyses were performed to isolate simple effects with appropriate post-hoc analyses. A 5% leve l of significance was set.
29 Results Locomotor Activity For the analysis of TDM a 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA with day (1,5,10) as the repeated me asure revealed a main effect of drug [F(1,28)=49.6, p<0.05], with cocaine treated rats engaging in significantly more TDM than saline injected controls. There was also a main eff ect of Day [F(2,56)=4.7, p<0.05], which showed that rats engaged in significan tly more TDM on day 1 than days 5 and 10. In addition, there was a significant inte raction between Day and Drug [F(2,56)=4.6, p<0.05], which revealed that cocaine treated rats had significantly higher TDM on day 1 than on days 5, 10 and compared to saline injected rats on all days (see Figure 1A). A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: salin e, cocaine) ANOVA with day (1,5,10) as the repeated measure was used to analyze th e dependent measure stereotypy. There were significant main effects of Age [F( 1,28)=6.5, p<0.05], Drug [F(1,28)=373.5, p<0.05] and Day [F(2,56)=14.4, p<0.05]. However there wa s also a significant interaction between Day and Drug [F(2,56)=14.3, p<0.05] indicating stereo typy scores from rats injected with cocaine significantly increased from day 1 to day 5 to day 10, suggesting that behavioral sensitization occurred in rats administered cocaine (see Figure 1B). DA levels: Area Under the Curve A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA on baseline DA revealed a significant Age by Dr ug interaction [F(1,28)=4.4, p<0.05] As can be seen in figure 2 rats pretreated w ith cocaine during adulthood had significantly lower baseline
30 DA levels than saline controls and adolescent co caine experienced rats. No differences in BL DA were detected between rats pretreated with saline or cocaine during adolescence. A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, co caine) X 2 (Natural reinforcer: water, sucrose) ANOVA on AUC DA rev ealed a significant interac tion between Age and Drug [F(1,24)=4.9, p<0.05], showing that adolescent ra ts pretreated with 20 mg/kg of cocaine have significantly higher DA levels in response to a natural reinforcer than those pretreated with saline during e ither adolescence or adulthoo d and those pretreated with cocaine as adults (p<0.05) (see Figure 3A/B insert). In addition, there was a significant interaction between Age and Natural reinforcer [F(1,24)=4.3, p<0.05]. Further analysis by the Fishers LSD test revealed that rats pretreated during the a dolescent period have significantly higher DA levels afte r drinking sucrose solution co mpared to rats pretreated during adulthood ( p<0.05). DA levels: Percent change from Baseline A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, co caine) X 2 (natural reinforcer: water, 0.3M sucrose) ANOVA with time (0-160 minutes ) as a repeated measure revealed a significant interaction between Age and Natural reinforcer [F(1,24)=4.8, p<0.05] with adolescent pretreated rats having significan tly higher DA levels in response to sucrose (M=150%) than all other groups. In addition, there was signif icant interact ion of Age, Drug, Natural reinforcer and Time [F(15,360)=1 .8, p<0.05]. As can be seen in figure 4 drinking water or sucrose resulted in a significant increase from baseline in all rats pretreated as adolescents or a dults with saline or cocaine ( p<0.05). Interestingly, rats
31 pretreated with cocaine as adolescents had significantly higher DA release as a result of drinking sucrose compared to all other groups ( p <0.05). Liquid Consumption A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, co caine) X 2 (Natural reinforcer: water, sucrose) ANOVA on liquid consum ption (ml) revealed a significant main effect of natural reinforcer [F(1,24)=145.9, p<0.05]. Inde pendent of age or drug, rats consumed significantly more water (Mean = 12.1 ml) than sucrose solution (Mean = 3.6 ml) (p<0.05). As shown in Figure 5, there were no differences in the amount of water, or sucrose consumed based on drug pretr eatment or age of pretreatment. Body Weight A 2 (Age: PND 35, 60) X 2 (Drug: saline, cocaine) ANOVA with day of limited access water treatment as a repeated measure revealed a significant main effect of Age [F(1,28)=191.4, p<0.05] with the adult pretreat ed rats weighing significantly more (M=387.1g) than the adolescent pretreated rats (M=294g) (p <0.05). In addition, a main effect of day of limited access water treatment was present with body weight decreasing from day 1 (M=346.1g), to day 4 (M=337.9g) (2.4%) (p<0.05). There was a significant interaction between Day limited access wate r treatment, Age and Drug [F(3,84)=4.5, p<0.05] with cocaine pretreated adults weighi ng significantly more th an saline pretreated adults by day 4 (p<0.05) (see Figure 6).
32 Discussion The neuroplasticity involved in response to the admini stration of drugs of abuse has been a big concern for scientists for decades. One real issue that we are now confronting is that these studies have been done in adult animals without examining the long term effects that drugs of abuse impose on neural development. In society, a large percentage of adolescents init iate drug use, impacting their brains resulting in changes which have unrevealed long term effects. Th e present study shows that those changes are extended to the point where they alter the re sponse of the reward system to a naturally reinforcing stimulus (as oppose to the drug). The present study demonstrates that basal DA levels in the shell region of the NAcc are affected differentia lly as a function of age by repeated cocaine use. Specifically, rats pretreated with cocaine as adults had lower baseline DA levels than saline pretreated rats. This finding is consiste nt with other studies in the adult literature ( Parsons, Smith & Justice, 1991; Segal & Kuczenski, 1992; Maisonneuve, Ho & Kreek 1995). It has been postulated that a decrease in tyrosine hydroxylas e levels within the NAcc leads to decreased basal DA levels, and this results in a postsynaptic downregulation of the DAergic system (Parsons, Smith & Justice 1991; Segal & Kuczenski, 1992; Maisonneuve, Ho & Kreek 1995). It is interesti ng that rats pretreated during adolescence with the same dose of co caine for the same length of time did not have a reduction in basal levels. This findi ng suggests that rats wh ich are treated with cocaine during adolescence are able to recove r from the effect of cocaine, demonstrating neuronal plasticity.
33 In all conditions there was a significant increase in DA in the NAcc after drinking sucrose solution or water. These results are consistent with other studies which have shown that sucrose (Hajnal, Smith, & Norgren, 2004) and water (Guion & Kirstein, 2001) both increase DA in the shel l region of the NA cc. Therefore, the finding that DA levels increased in response to both water and sucrose in saline pretreated rats was anticipated. Based on previous findings that adult animals on a high sugar diet showed greater behavioral sensitization when admi nistered AMPH (Avena et al., 2003a) and cocaine (Gosnell, 2005) than anim als on a control diet. It wa s expected that the cocaine pretreated adults would show a cross-sensitized response an d thus have higher DA levels in response to sucrose than saline pretreated rats, however, this was not the case. DA levels did significantly increase in response to sucrose in the cocaine pretreated adults but this increase was not different from saline pr etreated adults, thus there was no enhanced sensitivity of the DAergic system to sucros e. This is not surprising because human studies have shown that cocaine addicts ha ve a diminished response to stimuli that activate the mesolimbic system in control subjects (Majewska, 1996). Interestingly, sucrose intake significantly enhanced DA levels in cocaine pretreated adolescent rats. Other reports have also found that the effects of cocaine during adolescence are long lasting. For exam ple, Brandon and colleagues administered 15 mg/kg of cocaine for 5 days and found that adolescent rats which we re pretreated with cocaine showed persistent be havioral sensitization 2 months after cocaine cessation (Brandon, Marinelli, Baker & White, 2001). In addition, the administration of a high dose methylphenidate during adolescence, which like cocaine blocks the DAT (Kuczenski & Segal, 1997), caused cross-sensitization with cocaine (Brandon, Marinelli,
34 Baker & White, 2001). Adoles cent exposure to methylphenida te alters DAergic neurons in the VTA, an effect that is dependent on th e length of withdrawal. In early withdrawal from methylphenidate, there was an increase in the excitability of VTA neurons, whereas in late withdrawal when the rats were young adults there was a decrease in DAergic activity (Brandon, Marinelli & White, 2003). Th ese data suggest that cocaine use or a non-clinical high dose of methylphenidate durin g adolescence has long lasting effects on the reward system. Furthermore, the presen t findings demonstrate th at this long lasting sensitivity of the mesolimbic system afte r cocaine use during adolescence extends to palatable foods. This effect seems likely to be driven by the plastic nature of the developing adolescent brain. During adolescence brain maturation and devel opment take place and are characterized by extensive overproduction and subsequent pruning of synapses (Huttenlocher, 1984; Rakic et al., 1994). Stri atal DA receptor densities peak at PND 40 then decrease to adult levels (Teicher, Andersen, & Hostette r, Jr., 1995; Andersen et al., 2000). DAT expression in NAcc and striatum increases with age, peaking at PND 60 (Tarazi et al., 1998; C oulter et al., 1997). Due to incr easing numbers of DATs during adolescence, higher reuptake decreases ba sal DA in striatum (Andersen & Gazzara, 1993) and NAcc (Philpot & Kirstein, 1999) and upregulates cyclic-AMP signaling (Andersen, 2002). The profile of the adolesce nt mesolimbic system, with lower basal DA levels, increased DA receptors and second messe nger systems, could be overstimulated in the presence of cocaine. Pe rsistent postsynaptic stimula tion hyperpolarizes GABAergic neurons and allows for more release of DA into the extracellular space which could explain cocaine-induced hyperactivity observed in adolescent rats (Catlow & Kirstein,
35 2005; Maldonado & Kirstein, 2005). During adolescence, the PFC sends out glutamatergic projections to VTA and limbic ar eas (for Review see Lewis, 1997). It is plausible that repeated cocaine during adol escence overstimulates the mesolimbic system causing more dendritic arboriz ations of glutamatergic afferents to the VTA. The plasticity-induced change during this time in development, in combination with repeated cocaine, may not have been down-regulated as a result of drug withdrawal and instead remained robust, as there was no effect of repeated cocaine during adolescence on adult basal DA levels. This might explain why there is a stronger response to sucrose in the adolescents pretreated with co caine. There could be more glutamergic connections from the PFC to activate the VTA and stimulate th e release of DA in the NAcc. Repeated cocaine during adolescence could result in a circuitry primed for vulnerability to addiction. The DA response exhibited by cocaine pretre ated adults can be explained by the theory of neural sensitization. Repeated cocaine results in plastic changes including reduction of D2-R on Gabaergic efferents ( Bowers, McFarland, Lake, Peterson, Lapish, Gregory, Lanier & Kalivas, 2004) and arborizitations of the PFC afferents (Carlezon & Nestler, 2002). During cocaine abstinen ce a downregulation of messages in the mesolimbic system occurs, resulting in lower basal DA, as is seen in the adult cocaine pretreated condition presented in this study. Wh en the system is artificially stimulated by cocaine, DA levels in the NAcc are elevated due to less inhibitory feedback on the VTA from a reduction in D2-R on Gabaergic neurons and the amplificati on and activation of silent synapses of PFC inputs to VTA, causi ng sustained stimulati on of DA in the NAcc (Carlezon & Nestler, 2002; Bowers, McFarland, Lake, Peters on, Lapish, Gregory, Lanier
36 & Kalivas, 2004) This is not the case with sucros e as the effects of sucrose on the reward system are more subtle and activat e the mesolimbic system indirectly. The activation of the mesolimbic DA system in response to naturally rewarding stimuli provides incentive salience information to the neural correlates of reward-related stimuli and drives wanting or craving (Koob, 1992c; Berridge & Robinson, 1998). In the present study, the amount of natura l reinforcer consumed varied but was unaffected by drug or age of pr etreatment. Results from th is study show that rats consumed more water than sucrose. It is po ssible that rats consumed less sucrose due to neophobia and the expectation of drinking water. It is also possible that, because sucrose is a palatable food, the consumption of su crose increases activity in the mesolimbic system from the hypothalamus therefore incr easing the inhibition on the mesolimbic system, triggering the signal to stop drinking mo re rapidly (Puig de Parada, Paez, Parada, Hernandez, Molina, Murzi & C ontreras, 1997). The NAcc has direct connections to the lateral hypothalamus (Heimer, Zahm, Churchill, Kalivas & C. Wohltmann, 1991; Kirouac & Ganguly, 1995; Zahm & Brog, 1992). Si nce DA levels were relatively similar it appears that rats drunk an amount of liquid until the appropriate amount of inhibition on the DAergic system was received. Neuronal developmental is an important fact or to consider when investigating the long term effects of drug abus e. Brain circuits involved with emotion, judgment, and inhibitory control develop dur ing the adolescent period which could increase the risk for substance abuse during development ( Chambers, Taylor & Potenza, 2004). It is well known that drugs of abuse alter neurotransm itter systems and that the development and fine tuning of these systems occur during adolescence. The results from this experiment
37 clearly show that in rats pretreated with cocaine during adolescence there is an enhance response of the DAergic system in response to a naturally reinforcing substance therefore; cocaine exposure during adolescence results in persistent long term changes in the mesolimbic pathway. Future studies need to ascertain the underlying mechanisms and their role in the process of addiction.
38 List of References Adriani, W., Chiarotti, F., & Laviola, G. (1998). Elevated novelty seeking and peculiar d-amphetamine sensit ization in periadolescent mice compared with adult mice. Behav.Neurosci., 112, 1152-1166. Andersen, S. L (2002). Changes in the second messenger cyclic AMP during development may underlie motoric symptoms in attention deficity/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behav. Brain Res ., 130, 197-201. Andersen, S. L. & Gazzara, R. A. (1993). The ontogeny of apomorphine-induced alterations of neostriatal dopamine rel ease: effects on spontaneous release. J.Neurochem., 61, 2247-2255. Andersen, S. L., Thompson, A. T., Rutstein, M., Hostetter, J. C., & Teicher, M. H. (2000). Dopamine receptor pruning in prefront al cortex during the periadolescent period in rats. Synapse, 37, 167-169. Avena, N. M. & Hoebel, B. G. (2003a). A diet promoting sugar dependency causes behavioral cross-sensitiza tion to a low dose of amphetamine. Neuroscience, 122, 17-20.
39 Avena, N. M. & Hoebel, B. G. (2003b). Amphetamine-sensitized rats show sugarinduced hyperactivity (cross-sensi tization) and sugar hyperphagia. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 74, 635-639. Axelrod, J. (1971). Brain monoami nes. Biosynthesis and fate. Neurosci.Res.Program.Bull., 9, 188-196. Becker, J. B., Rudick, C. N., & Jenkins, W. J. (2001). The role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum during sexual behavior in the female rat. J.Neurosci., 21, 3236-3241. Berridge, K.C., & Robinson, T.E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev, 28, 309369. Blackburn, J. R., Phillips, A. G., & Fibiger, H. C. (1987). Dopamine and preparatory behavior: I. Effects of pimozide. Behav.Neurosci., 101, 352-360. Blackburn, J. R., Phillips, A. G., Jakubovi c, A., & Fibiger, H. C. (1989). Dopamine and preparatory behavior : II. A neurochemical analysis. Behav.Neurosci., 103, 15-23. Bowers, M.S., McFarland, K., Lake, R.W., Peterson, Y.K., Lapish, C.C., Gregory, M.L., Lanier, S.M. & Kalivas, P.W. (2004) Activator of G protein signaling 3: a gatekeeper of cocaine sensitization and drug seeking. Neuron, 42(2), 269-281.
40 Boye, S. M., Grant, R. J., & Clarke, P. B. (2001). Disruption of dopaminergic neurotransmission in nucleus accumbens core i nhibits the locomotor stimulant effects of nicotine and D-amphetamine in rats. Neuropharmacology, 40, 792-805. Brandon, C.L, Marinelli, M, Baker, L. K & White, F.J. (2001). Enhanced Reactivity and Vulnerability to Cocaine Following Methylphenidate Treatment in Adolescent Rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(5), 651-661. Brog, J. S., Salyapongse, A., Deutch, A. Y., & Zahm, D. S. (1993). The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the "accumbens" part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J.Comp Neurol., 338, 255-278. Bronstein, P. M., Wolkoff, F. D., & Levi ne, W. J. (1975). Sex-related differences in rats open-field activity. Behav.Biol., 13, 133-138. Brown, E. E. & Fibiger, H. C. (1992). Cocaine-induced conditioned locomotion: absence of associated increases in dopamine release. Neuroscience, 48, 621-629. Carlezon, W.A & Nestler, E.J. (2002). Elevated levels of GluR1 in the midbrain: a trigger fro sensitization to drugs of abuse? Trends in Neuroscience, 25(12), 610-615. Catlow, B.J & Kirsein, C.L (2005). He ightened cocaine-induced locomotor activity in adolescent compared to adult female rats. J Psychopharmacol, 19(5), 443-447.
41 Chambers, R.A., Taylor, J.R. & Potenza, M.N. (2004). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of a ddiction vulnerability. Am J Psychiatry, 160(6) :1041-1052. Coulter, C. L., Happe, H. K., & Murrin, L. C. (1997). Dopamine transporter development in postnatal rat striatum: an autoradiographic study with [3H]WIN 35,428. Brain Res.Dev.Brain Res., 104, 55-62. Dahlstrom, A. & Fuxe, K. (1964). Locali zation of monoamines in the lower brain stem. Experientia, 20, 398-399. Damsma, G., Pfaus, J. G., Wenkstern, D., Phillips, A. G., & Fibiger, H. C. (1992). Sexual behavior increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of male rats: comparison with novelty and locomotion. Behav.Neurosci., 106, 181-191. Das, G. (1993). Cocaine abuse in Nort h America: a milestone in history. J.Clin.Pharmacol., 33, 296-310. Di Chiara, G. (1999). Drug addiction as dopamine-dependent associative learning disorder. Eur.J.Pharmacol., 375, 13-30. Dyck, L. E. (1978). Uptake and release of meta-tyramine, para-tyramine, and dopamine in rat striatal slices. Neurochem.Res., 3, 775-791. Ettenberg, A., Pettit, H. O., Bloom, F. E., & Koob, G. F. (1982). Heroin and cocaine intravenous self-administration in ra ts: mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 78, 204-209.
42 Everitt, B. J. & Wolf, M. E. (2002). Ps ychomotor stimulant addiction: a neural systems perspective. J.Neurosci., 22, 3312-3320. Fibiger, H. C., Nomikos, G. G., Pfau s, J. G., & Damsma, G. (1992). Sexual behavior, eating and mesolimbic dopamine. Clin.Neuropharmacol., 15 Suppl 1 Pt A, 566A-567A. Fontana, D., Post, R. M., Weiss, S. R., & Pert, A. (1993a). The role of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the acquisition a nd expression of cocaine-induced conditioned increases in locomotor behavior. Behav.Pharmacol., 4, 375-387. Fontana, D. J., Post, R. M., & Pert, A. (1993b). Conditioned increases in mesolimbic dopamine overflow by stimuli associated with cocaine. Brain Res., 629, 3139. Gold, M. S., Galanter, M., & Stimmel, B. (1986). Cocaine: a new epidemic. Adv.Alcohol Subst.Abuse, 6, 1-5. Gold, M. S., Semlitz, L., Dackis, C. A., & Extein, I. (1985). The adolescent cocaine epidemic. Semin.Adolesc.Med., 1, 303-309. Gosnell, B. A. (2005). Sucrose intake e nhances behavioral sensitization produced by cocaine. Brain Res., 1031, 194-201. Greenberg, B. D. & Segal, D. S. (1985). Acute and chronic behavioral interactions between phe ncyclidine (PCP) and amphetamine: evidence for a
43 dopaminergic role in some PCP-induced behaviors. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 23, 99105. Groenewegen, H. J., Vermeulen-Van der Zee, E., te, K. A., & Witter, M. P. (1987). Organization of the projections from th e subiculum to the ventral striatum in the rat. A study using anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Neuroscience, 23, 103-120. Guion, E. D. & Kirstein, C. L. (2001). The effects of water-odor preference conditioning in the preadolescent nucleus accumbens septi. Dev.Psychobiol., 38, 46-55. Hajnal, A. & Norgren, R. (2001). Accumbens dopamine mechanisms in sucrose intake. Brain Res., 904, 76-84. Hajnal, A., Smith, G. P., & Norgren, R. (2004). Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat. Am.J.Physiol Regul.Integr.Comp Physiol, 286, R31-R37. Hernandez, L. & Hoebel, B. G. ( 1988). Food reward and cocaine increase extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens as measured by microdialysis. Life Sci., 42, 1705-1712. Hitri, A., Hurd, Y. L., Wyatt, R. J., & Deutsch, S. I. (1994). Molecular, functional and biochemical characteristics of the dopami ne transporter: regional differences and clinical relevance. Clin.Neuropharmacol., 17, 1-22. Huttenlocher, P. R. (1984). Synapse e limination and plasticity in developing human cerebral cortex. Am.J.Ment.Defic., 88, 488-496.
44 Hyman, S. E. & Malenka, R. C. (2001). A ddiction and the brain: the neurobiology of compulsion and its persistence. Nat.Rev.Neurosci., 2, 695-703. Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Brachman, J.G., & Schulenberg, J.E. (2005). Monitoring the Future national results on adol escent drug use: Over view of key findings, 2004. (NIH Publication No.) Bethesda MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. Kalivas, P. W. & Duffy, P. (1989). Similar effects of daily cocaine and stress on mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in the rat. Biol.Psychiatry, 25, 913-928. Kalivas, P. W. & Duffy, P. (1993). Time course of extracellular dopamine and behavioral sensitization to cocain e. I. Dopamine axon terminals. J.Neurosci., 13, 266275. Kalivas, P. W. & Duffy, P. (1995). Selec tive activation of dopamine transmission in the shell of the nuc leus accumbens by stress. Brain Res., 675, 325-328. Kalivas, P. W., Sorg, B. A., & Hooks M. S. (1993). The pharmacology and neural circuitry of sensit ization to psychostimulants. Behav.Pharmacol., 4, 315-334. Kalivas, P. W. & Weber, B. (1988). Am phetamine injection into the ventral mesencephalon sensitizes rats to peripheral amphetamine and cocaine. J.Pharmacol.Exp.Ther., 245, 1095-1102. Karoum, F., Chrapusta, S. J., Brinjak, R., Hitri, A., & Wyatt, R. J. (1994). Regional effects of amphetamine, cocaine, nomifensine and GBR 12909 on the dynamics of dopamine release and metabolism in the rat brain. Br.J.Pharmacol., 113, 1391-1399.
45 Kelly, P. H. & Iversen, S. D. (1976). Selective 6OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur.J.Pharmacol., 40, 45-56. Kiyatkin, E. A. & Gratton, A. (1994). El ectrochemical monito ring of extracellular dopamine in nucleus accumbens of rats lever-pressing for food. Brain Res., 652, 225-234. Koob, G. F. (1992a). Neural mechanisms of drug reinforcement. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci., 654, 171-191. Koob, G. F. (1992b). Neurobiological mechanisms in cocaine and opiate dependence. Res.Publ.Assoc.Res.Nerv.Ment.Dis., 70, 79-92. Koob, G. F. (1992c). Hedonic valence, dopamine and motivation, Mol. Psychiatry, 1, 186-189. Koob, G. F. & Nestler, E. J. (1997) The neurobiology of drug addiction. J.Neuropsychiatry Clin.Neurosci., 9, 482-497. Korczynski, R., Beck, J., & Bialy, M. (1989). Hippocampal rhythmical slow activity during instrumental responses with sexual rein forcement in male rats. Acta Neurobiol.Exp.(Wars.), 49, 255-264. Kuczenski, R & Segal, D.S. (1997). Eff ects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine: comparison with amphetamine. J Neurochem., 68(5), 2032-2037.
46 Lanier, L. P. & Isaacson, R. L. (1977) Early developmental changes in the locomotor response to amphetamine and their relation to hippocampal function. Brain Res., 126, 567-575. Laviola, G., Pascucci, T., & Pieretti, S. (2001). Striatal dopamine sensitization to D-amphetamine in periadolescent but not in adult rats. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 68, 115-124. Laviola, G., Wood, R. D., Kuhn, C., Francis, R., & Sp ear, L. P. (1995). Cocaine sensitization in periadolescent and adult rats. J.Pharmacol.Exp.Ther., 275, 345-357. Lewis, D.A. (1997). Development of the Prefrontal Cortex during Adolescence: Insights into Vulnerable Neural Circuits in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 16(6) 385-398. Lidow, M. S., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rakic, P. (1991). Synchronized overproduction of neurotransmitte r receptors in diverse region s of the primate cerebral cortex. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A, 88, 10218-10221. Lidow, M. S. & Rakic, P. (1992). Schedu ling of monoaminergic neurotransmitter receptor expression in the primate neoc ortex during postnatal development. Cereb.Cortex, 2, 401-416. Lishajko, F. (1969). Release, reuptake a nd net uptake of dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline in isolated sheep adrenal medullary granules. Acta Physiol Scand., 76, 159-171.
47 Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., & Schultz W. (1992). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. J.Neurophysiol., 67, 145-163. Maisonneuve, I.M., Ho, A. & Kreek, M.J. (1995). Chronic administration of a cocaine "binge" alters basal ex tracellular levels in male rats: an in vivo microdialysis study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther ., 272(2), 652-657. Majewska, M.D. (1996). Cocaine addi ction as a neurological disorder: implications for treatement. NIDA Res Monogr. 163, 1-26. Maldonado, A. M. & Kirstein, C. L. (2005). Handling alters cocaine-induced activity in adolescent but not adult male rats. Physiol Behav., 84, 321-326. Mark, G. P., Rada, P., Pothos, E., & Hoeb el, B. G. (1992). Effects of feeding and drinking on acetylcholine release in the nucle us accumbens, striatum, and hippocampus of freely behaving rats. J.Neurochem., 58, 2269-2274. McGeorge, A. J. & Faull, R. L. (1989). The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to th e striatum in the rat. Neuroscience, 29, 503-537. Mehrara, B. J. & Baum, M. J. (1990). Naloxone disrupts the expression but not the acquisition by male rats of a conditioned place preference response for an oestrous female. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 101, 118-125. Meng, S. Z., Ozawa, Y., Itoh, M., & Takashima, S. (1999). Developmental and age-related changes of dopamine transporte r, and dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in human basal ganglia. Brain Res., 843, 136-144.
48 Miller, N. S., Gold, M. S., & Millman, R. B. (1989). Cocaine: general characteristics, abuse, and addiction. N.Y.State J.Med., 89, 390-395. Mitchell, J. B. & Gratton, A. (1994). Involvement of mesolimbic dopamine neurons in sexual behaviors: implications for the neurobiology of motivation. Rev.Neurosci., 5, 317-329. Mogenson, G. J., Jones, D. L., & Yim, C. Y. (1980). From motivation to action: functional interface betw een the limbic system and the motor system. Prog.Neurobiol., 14, 69-97. Mucha, R. F., van der, K. D., O'Shaughnessy, M., & Bucenieks, P. (1982). Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Res., 243, 91-105. Murrin, L. C. & Zeng, W. (1986). Postnatal ontogeny of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatum. Biochem.Pharmacol., 35, 1159-1162. Murrin, L. C. & Zeng, W. Y. (1990). Ontogeny of dopamine D1 receptors in rat forebrain: a quantitative autoradiographic study. Brain Res.Dev.Brain Res., 57, 7-13. National Institutes of Health (1986). Gu ide for the care and use of laboratory animals (DHEW Publication No. 86-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Odell, W. D. & Swerdloff, R. S. (1976). Etiologies of sexual maturation: a model system based on the sexually maturing rat. Recent Prog.Horm.Res., 32, 245-288.
49 Ojeda, S. R., Urbanski, H. F., & Ahmed, C. E. (1986). The onset of female puberty: studies in the rat. Recent Prog.Horm.Res., 42, 385-442. Oldenburger, W. P., Everitt, B. J., & de Jonge, F. H. (1992). Conditioned place preference induced by sexual in teraction in female rats. Horm.Behav., 26, 214-228. Parsons, L.H., Smith, A.D. & Justice, J.B. Jr. (1991). Basal extracellular dopamine is decreased in the rat nucleus accumbens during abstinence from chronic cocaine. Synapse, 9(1), 60-5. Pfaus, J. G., Damsma, G., Nomikos, G. G., Wenkstern, D. G., Blaha, C. D., Phillips, A. G. et al. (1990). Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat. Brain Res., 530, 345-348. Pfaus, J. G. & Phillips, A. G. (1991) Role of dopamine in anticipatory and consummatory aspects of sexual behavior in the male rat. Behav.Neurosci., 105, 727-743. Philpot, R. M. & Kirstein, C. L. (1999) Repeated cocaine exposure: effects on catecholamines in the nucleus accumbens septi of periadolescent animals. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 62, 465-472. Pierce, R. C. & Kalivas, P. W. (1995 ). Amphetamine produces sensitized increases in locomotion and extracellular dopamine preferentially in the nucleus accumbens shell of rats administered repeated cocaine. J.Pharmacol.Exp.Ther., 275, 1019-1029.
50 Pierce, R. C. & Kalivas, P. W. (1997). A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to am phetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res.Brain Res.Rev., 25, 192-216. Pontieri, F. E., Tanda, G., & Di Chiara, G. (1995). Intravenous cocaine, morphine, and amphetamine preferentially increase ex tracellular dopamine in the "shell" as compared with the "core" of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A, 92, 12304-12308. Post, R. M., Lockfeld, A., Squillace, K. M., & Contel, N. R. (1981). Drugenvironment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci., 28, 755-760. Pothos, E. N. & Sulzer, D. (1998). Modul ation of quantal dopamine release by psychostimulants. Adv.Pharmacol., 42, 198-202. Puig de Parada, Paez, Parada, Hernand ez, Molina, Murzi & Contreras (1997). Opposite changes in dopamine and acetylcholin e release in the rat lateral hypothalamus during deprivation-induced drinking. Neurosci. Lett, 227, 153-156. Rakic, P., Bourgeois, J. P., & Gold man-Rakic, P. S. (1994). Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implicat ions for learning, memory, and mental illness. Prog.Brain Res., 102, 227-243.
51 Rao, P. A., Molinoff, P. B., & Joyce, J. N. (1991). Ontogeny of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in rat basal gang lia: a quantitative autoradiographic study. Brain Res.Dev.Brain Res., 60, 161-177. Ritz, M. C., Cone, E. J., & Kuhar, M. J. (1990). Cocaine inhibition of ligand binding at dopamine, norepinephrine and se rotonin transporters: a structure-activity study. Life Sci., 46, 635-645. Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res.Brain Res.Rev., 18, 247-291. Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. ( 2000). The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive-sensitization view. Addiction, 95 Suppl 2, S91-117. Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (2001) Incentive-sensitiza tion and addiction. Addiction, 96, 103-114. Roitman, M. F., Stuber, G. D., Phillips, P. E., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2004). Dopamine operates as a subs econd modulator of food seeking. J.Neurosci., 24, 1265-1271. Rolls, E. T., Rolls, B. J., Kelly, P. H., Shaw, S. G., Wood, R. J., & Dale, R. (1974). The relative attenuati on of self-stimulation, eati ng and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade. Psychopharmacologia., 38, 219-230.
52 Salamone, J. D. (1996). The behavior al neurochemistry of motivation: methodological and conceptual issues in st udies of the dynamic activity of nucleus accumbens dopamine. J.Neurosci.Methods, 64, 137-149. Schenk, S., Snow, S., & Horger, B. A. (1991). Pre-exposure to amphetamine but not nicotine sensitizes rats to the motor activating effect of cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 103, 62-66. Schultz, W. (1997). Dopamine neurons a nd their role in reward mechanisms. Curr.Opin.Neurobiol., 7, 191-197. Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593-1599. Segal, D.S. & Kuczenski, R. (1992). Re peated cocaine administration induces behavioral sensitization and corresponding decreased extracellular dopamine responses in caudate and accumbens. Brain Res., 577(2), 351-5. Skinner, B. F. (1966). The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior. Science, 153, 1205-1213. Smith, G. P. & Schneider, L. H. ( 1988). Relationships between mesolimbic dopamine function a nd eating behavior. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci., 537, 254-261.
53 Snyder, K. J., Katovic, N. M., & Spear, L. P. (1998). Longevity of the expression of behavioral sensitization to cocaine in preweanling rats. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 60, 909-914. Spear, L. P. & Brake, S. C. (1983). Peri adolescence: age-depe ndent behavior and psychopharmacological responsivity in rats. Dev.Psychobiol., 16, 83-109. Spear, L. P. & Brick, J. (1979). Cocaine-i nduced behavior in the developing rat. Behav.Neural Biol., 26, 401-415. Stewart, J. & Badiani, A. (1993). Tolera nce and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav.Pharmacol., 4, 289-312. Stewart, J., De Wit, H., & Eikelboo m, R. (1984). Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-admin istration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol.Rev., 91, 251-268. Tarazi, F. I., Tomasini, E. C., & Baldessarini, R. J. (1998). Postnatal development of dopamine and serotonin transporters in rat caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens septi. Neurosci.Lett., 254, 21-24. Teicher, M. H., Andersen, S. L., & Host etter, J. C., Jr. (1995). Evidence for dopamine receptor pruning between adolescen ce and adulthood in striatum but not nucleus accumbens. Brain Res.Dev.Brain Res., 89, 167-172.
54 Tirelli, E., Laviola, G., & Adriani, W. (2003). Ontogenesis of behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference induced by psychostimulants in laboratory rodents. Neurosci.Biobehav.Rev., 27, 163-178. Trujillo, K. A. & Akil, H. (1991). Opia te tolerance and de pendence: recent findings and synthesis. New Biol., 3, 915-923. U.S. Census Bureau (2004). Estimates of the Resident Population by Selected Age Groups for the United States and States and for Puerto Rico: July 1, 2004 (Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau Vanderschuren, L. J. & Kalivas, P. W. (2000). Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction a nd expression of behavior al sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 151, 99-120. Wenkstern, D., Pfaus, J. G., & Fibiger, H. C. (1993). Dopamine transmission increases in the nucleus accumbens of male rats during their first exposure to sexually receptive female rats. Brain Res., 618, 41-46. White, F. J. (1996). Synaptic regulation of mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons. Annu.Rev.Neurosci., 19, 405-436. White, F. J. & Kalivas, P. W. (1998). Neuroadaptations involved in amphetamine and cocaine addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend., 51, 141-153. Wise, R. A. (1988). The neurobiology of craving: implications for the understanding and treatment of addiction. J.Abnorm.Psychol., 97, 118-132.
55 Wise, R. A. & Bozarth, M. A. (1982). Ac tion of drugs of abuse on brain reward systems: an update with speci fic attention to opiates. Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav., 17, 239-243. Wise, R. A. & Bozarth, M. A. (1984). Br ain reward circuitry: four circuit elements "wired" in apparent series. Brain Res.Bull., 12, 203-208. Wise, R. A. & Bozarth, M. A. (1985). Brain mechanisms of drug reward and euphoria. Psychiatr.Med., 3, 445-460. Wise, R. A. & Bozarth, M. A. (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol.Rev., 94, 469-492. Wright, C. I., Beijer, A. V., & Groe newegen, H. J. (1996). Basal amygdaloid complex afferents to the rat nucleus accumbens are compartmentally organized. J.Neurosci., 16, 1877-1893. Zahm, D. S. (1999). Functional-anatom ical implications of the nucleus accumbens core and shell subterritories. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci., 877, 113-128. Zahm, D. S. & Brog, J. S. (1992). On the significance of subt erritories in the "accumbens" part of the rat ventral striatum. Neuroscience, 50, 751-767. Zahm, D. S. & Heimer, L. (1993). Specifici ty in the efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat: comparison of the rostral pole projection patterns with those of the core and shell. J.Comp Neurol., 327, 220-232.
56 Zeng, W. Y., Hyttel, J., & Murrin, L. C. (1988). Ontogeny of dopamine D1 receptors in rat striatum. J.Neurochem., 50, 862-867. Zukin, R. S., Tempel, A., & Gardner, E. L. (1984). Opiate receptor upregulation and functional supersensitivity. NIDA Res.Monogr, 54, 146-161.
Appendix A Figure 1A 0500010000150002000025000300001510Pretreatment DayTDM (cm ) Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine The Locomotor Effect of Repeated Cocaine:Total Distance Moved** Figure 1B 3456781510Pretreatment DayStereotypy score Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine **The Locomotor Effects of Repeated Cocaine:Stereotypy 58
Appendix B Figure 2 59 Baseline Dopamine Levels After Drug Pretreatment In Adolescence or Adulthood00.10.20.30.22.214.171.124AdolescentAdultPretreatment AgeDopamine levels (nM) Saline Cocaine **
Appendix C Figure 3A 0.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.80102030405060708090100110120130140150160Time (minutes)Dopamine levels (nM) Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine Water Access 012345salinecocaineAUC DA Adolescence Adulthood Figure 3B 0.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.80102030405060708090100110120130140150160Time (minutes)Dopamine Levels (nM) Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine 02468salinecocaineAUC DA Adolescent Adult Sucrose Access 60
Appendix D Figure 4A Dopamine Levels in Response to Water 6080100120140160180200220240260280300102030405060708090100110120130140150160Time (minutes)DA % Baselin e Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine Water Access Figure 4B Appendix E 61 Dopamine Levels in Response to Sucrose601001401802202603001020304050607080 90 100110120130140150160Time (minutes)DA % Baseline Adolescent saline Adolescent cocaine Adult saline Adult cocaine Sucrose Access
Figure 5 Amount of Natural Reinforcer Consumed During Microdialysis0246810121416SalineCocaineSalineCocaine Adolescence AdulthoodLiquid Consumed (m l water sucrose 62
Appendix F Figure 6 Body Weight of Rats During Limited Access Water Treatment2702903103303503703904101234Day Body Weight (g) adolescent saline adolescent cocaine adult saline adult cocaine 63
64 Appendix G Figure Legends Figure 1 illustrates the locomo tor activity of rats during th e pretreatment period. Rats received 20mg/kg of cocaine or saline for 10 days from ages PND 35-44 or PND 70-79. Locomotor activity was recorded on day 1, da y 5 and day 10. A) Shows that the total distance moved (cm) in cocaine treated rats was significantly higher on day 1 than on days 5 and 10. B) Average stereotypy scores from rats injected with cocaine significantly increased from day 1 to day 5 to day 10, sugge sting that behavioral sensitization occurred in rats administered cocaine. indicates significant difference from cocaine pretreated rats on day 1. Figure 2 illustrates baseline DA (nM) levels after drug pretreatment during either adolescence (PND 35-44) or adulthood (PND 7079) with either sa line or 20mg/kg of cocaine. Rats pretreated with cocaine during adulthood had significantly lower baseline DA levels than saline controls. In addition, cocaine pretreated adul ts had significantly lower baseline DA levels than rats pretreat ed with cocaine during adolescence. indicates significant difference from adult cocaine pretreated rats. Note: 8 rats were used in each condition. Figure 3 shows DA levels [nM] in response to a natural reinforcer. A) DA levels in response to water and B) DA levels in respons e to 0.3 M sucrose. Insert graphs show DA levels (normalized by AUC analysis) during the presentation of water (A) or 0.3 M
65 Sucrose (B). Adolescent rats pretreated with 20 mg/kg of cocaine have significantly higher DA levels in response to a natural reinforcer than those pretreated with saline during either adolescence or adulthood and t hose pretreated with cocaine as adults ( p<0.05). Furthermore rats pret reated during the adolescent period have significantly higher DA levels after drinking sucrose solu tion compared to rats pretreated during adulthood ( p <0.05). Note: 4 rats were used in each condition. Figure 4 shows DA levels in response to a natu ral reinforcer presente d by percent change from baseline. A) illustrates the B) demonstrat es that rats pretreat ed with cocaine during adolescence have a significan t increase in DA compared to all other conditions (p<0.05). Figure 5 illustrates the amount of liquid that was consumed by rats for 20 minutes during microdialysis. Rats consumed significantly more water (Mean = 12.1 ml) than sucrose solution (Mean = 3.6 ml) (p<0.05). There were no differences in the amount of water, or sucrose consumed based on drug pretr eatment or age of pretreatment. Figure 6 shows the body weight (g) of rats over the four days of limited access water. No differences in body weight were detected as a result of drug pretreatment and rats pretreated as adults weighed significan tly more (M=387.1g) than the adolescent pretreated rats (M=294g) (p<0.05).
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam Ka
controlfield tag 001 001709497
007 cr mnu|||uuuuu
008 060509s2005 flua sbm s000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E14-SFE0001354
An evaluation of the dopaminergic systems' response to a natural reinforcer
h [electronic resource] :
b a comparison between cocaine pretreatment in adolescent and adult rats. /
by Briony Catlow.
[Tampa, Fla.] :
University of South Florida,
Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Florida, 2005.
Includes bibliographical references.
Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Title from PDF of title page.
Document formatted into pages; contains 70 pages.
ABSTRACT: The long-term consequences of adolescent drug use in shaping a network primed for addiction is an issue of utmost importance. The use of cocaine during adolescent development could alter the normal growth of the reward system and affect the adult mesolimbic system, however, there is scant literature aimed at finding out if animals are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of drugs during adolescence. The present study investigated whether cocaine pretreatment in adolescent and adult rats produced differences in cocaine-induced neurochemical cross-sensitization to a naturally reinforcing substance in adulthood. To evaluate the responsivity of the mesolimbic system after repeated cocaine, sucrose was offered during the dialysis procedure and dialysate was collected. All saline pretreated rats had significant increases in DA levels compared to baseline levels and there were no difference in the age of pretreatment.Rats pretreated with cocaine as adults also had significant increases in DA levels after sucrose. Interestingly, sucrose intake significantly enhanced DA levels in cocaine pretreated adolescent rats. The results from this experiment clearly show that in rats pretreated with cocaine during adolescence there is an enhance response of the DAergic system in response to a naturally reinforcing substance therefore; cocaine exposure during adolescence results in persistent long term changes in the mesolimbic pathway. Future studies need to ascertain the underlying mechanisms and their role in the process of addiction.
Adviser: Cheryl Kirstein.
Nucleus accumbens septi.
t USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations.