USF Libraries
USF Digital Collections

A family's deadly sin


Material Information

A family's deadly sin fatal child abuse in Florida, an anthropological perspective on child deaths due to abuse and neglect
Physical Description:
Williams, Christa A
University of South Florida
Place of Publication:
Tampa, Fla
Publication Date:


Subjects / Keywords:
Child maltreatment
Family violence
Parental motivation
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )


ABSTRACT: This thesis examines child death data in an effort to assist in prevention and intervention, as well as, to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis to improve and enhance policy development around child deaths due to abuse and neglect in florida. The data reviewed consisted of aggregate data for all incidents of child deaths (N = 266) in Florida where the primary caregiver was the alleged perpetrator of a child fatality for children under age 18. All data examined were recorded and stored in the Department of Children and Families' Child Safety Assessment database between 1998 and 2000. According to national and state data on maltreatment deaths, the number of physical abuse deaths are slightly higher than fatalities categorized as due to neglect (51% and 43%, respectively), and the remaining 6% are attributed to both abuse and neglect. The data suggest that mothers account for the greatest percentage of child deaths due to neglect, while fathers and other male careg ivers are responsible for the greatest percentage of child fatalities due to physical abuse. There was no significant difference between child fatalities committed by biological fathers as opposed to other male caregivers, which suggests that policies around caregiver relationship has had limited impact on child safety. Describing and defining different kinds of maltreatment requires that attention be paid to historical and cultural environments. Policies for preventing or reducing child deaths requires understanding of risk factors and protective factors at the level of the individual, the family, the community, and the society. Whereas men and women differ in types of maltreatment they are likely to commit, the difference in rate of child fatalities committed by biological fathers as opposed to other male caregivers is insignificant. These findings suggest that policies that focus on caregiver relationship have limited impact on child safety. Anthropological holistic insight on the d omains and factors that contribute to the increase in child deaths due to maltreatment may help to develop new policy initiatives. Until research advances our knowledge and that knowledge is used to set policies, and those polices properly implemented, children will continue to fall victim to maltreatment fatalities.
Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Florida, 2006.
Includes bibliographical references.
System Details:
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
System Details:
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Statement of Responsibility:
by Christa A. Williams.
General Note:
Title from PDF of title page.
General Note:
Document formatted into pages; contains 138 pages.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of South Florida Library
Holding Location:
University of South Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 001914435
oclc - 176630069
usfldc doi - E14-SFE0001756
usfldc handle - e14.1756
System ID:

This item is only available as the following downloads:

Full Text


A Familys Deadly Sin: Fatal Child Abuse in Florida An Anthropological Perspective on Child Deaths Due to Abuse and Neglect by Christa A. Williams A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement s for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Alvin Wolfe, Ph.D. Linda Whiteford, Ph.D. Susan Greenbaum, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 9, 2006 Keywords: Child Maltreatment, Homicide, Infanticide, Filicide, Family Violence, Parental motivation Copyright 2006, Christa A. Williams


Acknowledgements I would like to thank a number of peopl e for their assistance, support and willingness to help me through my internship and thesis writing. A special thanks to my major Professor, Dr. Wolfe, for his continued guidance, direction and encouragement. In addition, a special thanks to Dr. Linda Whiteford and Susan Greenbaum, members of my advisory co mmittee, for their support and encouragement throughout my graduate program. I wish to express a debt of gratit ude to the Department of Children and Families, both at the stat e and local levels, and the Sarasota Family YMCA for allowing me the opportunity to combine my internship and research efforts in child deaths with my career in child we lfare services. A particular thanks to the Child Death Review Committee for s haring their personal and professional opinions and experiences. Finally, to my husband and children whose support and love made it possible for me to devote endless hours to completing my educational goals.


Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................ iii Abstract ................................................................................................................iv Introduction ...........................................................................................................6 Historical Overview .............................................................................................13 The Birth of National Legislation on Child Abuse in America ..............................22 Defining Child Abuse and Neglect ......................................................................29 Classifications for Child Abuse ...........................................................................34 Physical Abuse ........................................................................................35 Sexual Abuse ...........................................................................................37 Neglect .....................................................................................................39 Risk Factors ........................................................................................................44 Community Level Risk Factors ................................................................49 Family Level Risk Factors ........................................................................51 Individual/Child Level Risk Factors ..........................................................54 Protective Factors ...............................................................................................56 The International Perspective .............................................................................59 The National Perspective ...................................................................................63 The State Perspective ........................................................................................66 The Local (SunCoast Region) Perspective .........................................................70 Literature Review ................................................................................................72 Hypothesis ..........................................................................................................81 Methodology .......................................................................................................83 i


Results and Discussion ......................................................................................87 Conclusion ........................................................................................................102 Recommendation .............................................................................................105 Bibliography ......................................................................................................113 Appendices 136 Appendix A: List of Ac ronyms...............................................................138 ii


List of Tables Table 1 Multilevel Risk Factor s..................................................................45 Table 2 A Wilcoxson Si gned-Rank Test.....................................................88 Table 3 A Scatter Plot of the Correlation Between Fatality Rates Per 100,000 Child Deaths (Y ears 1998 and 200 0)..............................90 Table 4 Test of Normalit y...........................................................................90 Table 5 Pearson Correlati on......................................................................91 Table 6 Aggregate National Child Death Data (1998-2003) .......................94 Table 7 Aggregate Florida Child Death Data by Age (Years 19992002).............................................................................................95 Table 8 Aggregate National Child Death Data by Age (Years 19992002).............................................................................................96 Table 9 Aggregate Florida Child Death Data by Race (Years 19992003).............................................................................................98 Table 10 Aggregate Florida Child D eath Data by Gender (Years 19992003)........................................................................................... 100 iii


A Familys Deadly Sin: Fatal Child Abuse in Florida An Anthropological Perspective on Child Deaths Due to abuse and Neglect Christa A. Williams ABSTRACT This thesis examines child death data in an effort to assist in prevention and intervention, as well as, to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis to improve and enhance policy development around child deaths due to abuse and neglect in Florida. The data reviewed cons isted of aggregate data for all incidents of child deaths (N = 266) in Florida wher e the primary caregiver was the alleged perpetrator of a child fatality for child ren under age 18. All data examined were recorded and stored in the Department of Children and Families Child Safety Assessment database between 1998 and 2000. According to national and state data on maltreatment de aths, the number of physical abuse deaths are slightly higher than fatalities categorized as due to neglect (51% and 43%, respectively), and the remaining 6% are attributed to both abuse and neglect. The data suggest that mothers account for the greatest percentage of child deaths due to negl ect, while fathers and other male caregivers are responsible for the greates t percentage of child fatalities due to physical abuse. There was no signific ant difference between child fatalities committed by biological fathers as oppos ed to other male caregivers, which iv


suggests that policies around caregiver re lationship has had limited impact on child safety. Describing and defining di fferent kinds of maltr eatment requires that attention be paid to historical and cult ural environments. Policies for preventing or reducing child deaths requires underst anding of risk factors and protective factors at the level of the individual, the family, the community, and the society. Whereas men and women differ in types of maltreatment t hey are likely to commit, the difference in rate of child fatalities committed by biological fathers as opposed to other male caregivers is in significant. These findings suggest that policies that focus on caregiver relationship have limited impact on child safety. Anthropological holistic insight on t he domains and factors that contribute to the increase in child deaths due to maltreatment may help to develop new policy initiatives. Until research advances our knowledge and that knowledge is used to set policies, and those polices properly implemented, children will continue to fall victim to maltreatment fatalities. v


Introduction A simple child, that lightly draws it s breath, and feels its life in every limb, what should it know of death? in a poem titled We are Seven by William Wordsworth (1798) says it best about the em otions felt when investigating a child death due to abuse. The death of a child is always difficult to accept. Yet, when a child dies at the hands of a primary caregiver, it is especially alarming and tragic. Regardless of how the fatality occurs, one issue of major concern is that the responsible parties are oft en the primary caretakers answerable for the safety, well being and supervision of the child victims. The health of children are imperative because of the im portance of children for t he future of society and because the vulnerability of children makes them a good indicator of the health conditions in the population as a whole. Robe rt E. Reed reminds us that just as in the old days the miners canary gave warning by its death of the presence of noxious gases in the mine, infant mo rtality has served as an indicator of dangerous conditions, which may affe ct the entire popu lation (1984:123). Child fatalities are the most seve re consequences of child abuse and neglect. The issue of investigating a topi c with emotional over tones, like child death due to maltreatment, it is perhaps more necessary than usual to specify what the issues are, what are to c ount as facts, and what theoretical and methodological approaches to use to address this severe complex social 6


problem. David Gough states that the potentia l benefit of conversant research around child abuse is that it offers evidence to inform decision-making around policy initiatives; however, he reminds us that there are also negative consequences of well-intended research (2005:43). The aim of this thesis is to examine ch ild death data in an effort to assist in prevention and intervention and to provi de qualitative and quantitative analysis that will enhance policy making around child deaths due to maltreatment at the state and local level. Nick Spencer and Norma Baldwin suggest that the care of children is not just the responsibility of parents and families, but also that of societies as a whole. Further, that the issue of child neglect requires a holistic framework (2005:26). In order to address an issue with such intricacies, one must first examine the details inherent in child abuse symptomatoloy, diagnosis and reporting. During the fall semester of 2003, I performed my internship with the Department of Children and Families in Hillsborough County under the supervision of Kim Kutch, the local Ch ild Death Review Specialist, and Peggy Niermann, my immediate supervisor. This research was based on an analysis of existing child death data as well as revie wing all current child deaths with prior abuse history in the SunCoast Region, which consists of Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, DeSoto, Manatee and Sarasota Counties. During my internship, there were thirty-five deaths reviewed by the States Child Abuse Death Review Team 7


for the calendar year 2003. As part of my internship, I worked with both the local and state death teams. Additionally, I se rved as backup to the Region Death Review Specialist in recording and reporting child deaths in the Region. The focus of this thesis is to exami ne the factors or comb ination of factors that contribute to the death of child ren under the supervi sion of the State Department of Children and Families (DCF ). I argue that prior Departmental policies have failed to address the cultural political and socio-economic factors that influence child deaths. I suggest that mothers are the prim ary perpetrators of child deaths due to neglect and that males in a caretaker role are the primary perpetrators of child deaths due to physica l abuse. Consistent with both the goals of CADRT and the methods of applied ant hropology it is my goal to enhance services to children at risk of child maltreatment death. In lending my research to the goals and mission of Floridas child welfare system, my research questions are: 1. What are the demographic data on the population served? 2. Do mothers or mothers par amours cause more child deaths? 3. Do more children die at the hand of female or male caregivers? 4. What are the cultural implic ations of defining child abuse? 5. Do race and gender inequalities affect the rate of abuse? 6. How do local rates of child death compare to State and National data? 7. How do economic factors affect child safety and well-being? 8. Is abuse more likely in single parent versus two parent homes? 8


9. What role does a lack of education pl ay in predicting children at risk of abuse? 10. What are the impediments to servic es provided by the Department of Children and Families, and how can they be improved? 11. How do current child abuse policies promote safe and stable families? The National Child Abuse and Neglec t Data System (NCANDS) reported an estimated 1,400 child fatalities in the Un ited States in 2002. This translates to a rate of 1.98 children per 100,000 children in the general population. The rate of child abuse and neglect fatalities report ed by NCANDS has increased slightly over the last several years from 1.68 per 100,000 children in 1998 to 2.0 in 2003. According to NCANDS, statistics on approx imately 20 percent of fatalities were from health departments and fatality review boards for 2002, as compared to 11.4 percent for 2001. However, experts do not necessarily agree whether this represents an actual increas e in child abuse and neglect fatalities or greater coordination of data colle ction among agencies and impr ovements in reporting procedures. According to the National Center on Child Abuse Prevention Research (1998), national statistics estimate that 51% of maltreatment fatalities are from physical abuse, 45% from neglect and 4% fr om multiple forms of maltreatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) su ggests that there is convincing evidence that child maltreatment is a gr owing global concern. Additionally, that 9


child maltreatment can occur in some form in every country, whether rich or poor, and that the factors affecting child abuse is deeply rooted in cultural, economic and social practices (WHO, 2002). Due to a lack of equity in reporting as well as over reporting child abuse, the methodological and theor etical toolkit of an anthr opological investigation could provide a beneficial perspective in which to conceptualize child abuse and neglect statewide. For exam ple, during the early 1990s, children born to mothers that tested positive for drugs at delivery we re placed in foster care. This practice resulted in more children from lowe r socio-economic mothers reported for neglect. Yet, drug usage is not limited to on ly mothers from lo wer socio-economic status. Further ethnographic observation c an provide the necessary scientific framework needed to inform policy and enha nce prevention efforts at the individual, family, community and state levels around the child deaths due to severe maltreatment as well as ch ild abuse in general. The absence of consistent data on child malt reatment has contributed to the inconsistent way in which child abuse and neglect is defined, thereby making cross-cultural definitions difficult and absolute comparisons worldwide complicated. When one applies a cultural lens, defining child abuse becomes more problematic from an epistemological perspective. Nancy Scheper-Hughes observes that mothers in Brazil find it i nappropriate to interfere with the death of children who seem weak ( 1995). Caroline Bledsoe, in reference to parenting 10


strategies in Sierra Leone, asserts that some parents believe in order for children to advance they must work and study hard, endure beatings and suffer sickness to mold their characters and earn k nowledge (1990:71). These ideologies are part of the socio-political, so cio-economic and socio-cultural fabric of life in these cultures. Yet, either of these parental patterns would be in conflict with western views of abuse and neglect, thereby, comp licating an operational definition of child abuse and neglect that would se rve a cross-cultural perspective. Cultural relativity aside, ther e are some cultural practices around childrearing that create a firestorm of controversy. For exampl e, such practices as tribal scarification and female circ umcision are among the cross-cultural childrearing practices that are in conflict worldwide (K orbin, 1977). While some cultures uphold one particular custom, yet in another society, that same custom is offensive, if not criminal. In the Unit ed States, the term ch ild abuse can include any form of physical punishment. The present social trends no longer support the physical disciplining of ch ildren, as evidenced by the current debate over to spank or not to spank (Straus, 1991; Ellis on et al., 1996). The use of corporal punishment continues to be highly debated. In Sweden, for example, laws prohibit any physical punishment of ch ildren, which include spanking. By contrast, in some Asian, African, and Caribbean countries not only is corporal punishment legal it is expected (Gelle s, 2005; Innocenti R eport, 2003). In the United States, most states have incor porated laws against this practice. However, as evidenced through the news media and other broadcast 11


entertainment venues (Gil, 1970; Strauss, 1974), Americans continue to live in a culture that accepts physical, emotional and psychological violence. While we cannot take the extreme cultural relativist position that any cultural childrearing practice would be acceptable by worldw ide standards, we must avoid imposing our own emic view expecting it to serve as an internationally acceptable definition of child abuse worldwide (Korbin 1977). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child rejects the notion of cult ural relativism in favor of a universal approach that transcends cultural, religious historical and economic differences in order to set a minimum standard worldwide (Innocenti Report Card, 2003). Nevertheless, it would be negligent to review the problem of child abuse and neglect in America without lo oking at the racial and cu ltural differences within the society deemed to be a "melting pot" as well as the historical and social trajectories that have contributed to the current problem. To address this phenomenon, the issue of child maltreatment must first be understood in its historical framework. Acco rding to the historical and cross-cultural evidence, violence in the family has been around for as long as humankind, family life or recorded history (Zigler and Hall, 1989). A ccording to James Garbarino, child maltreatment is a phenomenon as old as humanity (1977). Robert L. Burgess and James Garbarino suggest, When we look beyond the press of public concern, the clamor of the news media, and the incentives of federally financed research grants, it becomes evident t hat violence, aggression, and the severe mistreatment of children dates from antiquity (1983:90). 12


Historical Overview In order to appreciate t he evolution of child protection, we must garner an understanding of the historic al context that paved the way for the development of our current child welfare system. Trattner suggests, Like all other social institutions, social welfare systems did not develop within a vacuum; rather, it is the product of customs, stat utes and practices of the past (1999:1). In order to comprehend the present state of child protective poli cy and procedures, it is necessary to examine child maltreatment in a historical context. The guiding principles of what constitute child maltreatment have always been deeply rooted in the political, social, economic and religi ous fabric of any given society. Maria Scannapieco and Kelli Connell-Carrick (2005) remind us that the plight of children prior to the ninet eenth century was filled with documented evidence of the violence against children. Throughout history, children worldwide have suffered at the hands of caregivers and society through sexual exploitation, starvation, domination, murder, abandonment, mutilation, beatings, and forced labor just to name a few (Zigler and Hall, 1989). Historically, children were most often cared for within their band, tribe or kinship network, and as such, were often cared for well. The anthropological literature suggests that in most instances children were valued 13


members of their kinship networks. Howeve r, the anthropological literature also presents studies of traditi onal societies, such as the Yanomamo people of South America, where the practice of infanticide was acc epted (Chagnon, 1968). In ancient Greek and Roman society, a father could dispose of his child as he saw fit. Among some traditional patriarc hal groups of ancient China, female infanticide was practiced. Some societies have promoted the killing of children born with birth defects, mental challe nges, or disease. Often children were considered personal possessions and t hat it was the par ents right and responsibility to mold them into socially acceptable citizens by any means necessary (Giovannoni and Becerra, 1979). This ideology can be traced from English feudal society where personal re lationships were defined in terms of property (Giovannoni and Becerra, 1979). The idea that stern discipline as a parenting strategy was widely embraced as a religious practice and was practiced by many cultures and passed down through the generations. Currently, there is still a broad cons ensus among conservative religious enclaves who believe that corporal punishment is a necessary and important part of child rearing (Ellison, Bartkowski and Segal, 1996). While there are biblical passages in the Old and New Testaments on importance of children (Psalm 127 and Mark 10), the Bible also offers pa ssages where children were intentionally murdered (Exodus and the Book of Deut eronomy). The biblical quote Spare the rod, spoil the child has historically been used to justify the punishment of 14


children and, in fact, is still used today. While the Bibles teaching cannot solely be held accountable for the atrocities perpet rated upon children, su ffice it to say, religious beliefs have played an important role in shaping parents disciplining techniques (Radbill, 1968; S hepard, 1965). Hence, religious beliefs contributed significantly to shaping the role and value of children in the family as well as society as a whole prior to the ear ly nineteenth century (Giovannoni, 1989). As civilizations continued to ex pand so did the number of abandoned children. As the number of abandoned childr en grew beyond the caring capacity of relatives, family friends, or in some instances close neighbors, the plight of children became one of growing public concer n. Child welfare services were born out of the benevolence of individual and church endowments who sought to redress the impact of epidemi cs, wars and in fact, the in dustrial revolution had on the plight of children. The industrial revolution adversely affected child well-being (Trattner, 1999; Giovannoni, 1989). The works of Henry Mayhew in London Labour and London Poor further evidence the plight of poor children (1860). The mistreatment of the poor, and in particular children, is immortalized in fict ion by the works of Charles Dickens and Charlotte Bronte. With increased urbaniza tion came big city problems, which included long working hours, crime, unhealthy living co nditions and poverty. Poor economic conditions of the time made it necessary for families to send their 15


children to work in factories with unsaf e working conditions in order to avoid abject poverty (Katz, 1986; Trattner, 1999; Mayhew, 1860). In addition to the aforementioned factors w ars played a significant role in creating parentless children. The Civil Wa r, in particular, helped to shape the trajectory of neglected and abandoned children in the United States during the mid nineteenth century. Be cause of the Civil War, many thousands of children were orphaned. At a time when countries conceived prisons and insane asylums, it also sought to institutionalize the overpopulation of children that were a byproduct of the war. This benevolent ideology was the result of a society that believed safeguarding the ch ildren was essential to a strong and productive society (Trattner, 1999). Almshouses, also known as poor houses, first appeared on the scene in England and Europe in the eighteenth century and were an attempt to address the growing population of abandoned childr en as well as adult debtors and the mentally ill. By all accounts, many alms houses were vile catchalls for victims of every sort of misery, mi sfortune, and misconduct who were herded together and badly mistreated (Trattner 1999:113). Most of the financial supports for these institutions were through the generosity of private and church endowment, while at the same time orphans were expected to contribute to their care through hard labor. Public outcries at the condition and treatment of children in almshouses 16


lead to reforms and in particular the creat ion of institutions specifically for children, known as orphanages (Katz, 1996). Prior to the Civil War, North America saw the birth of orphanages in different areas of the Unit ed States: Louisiana, Georgi a, South Carolina and New York and Ohio (Trattner, 1999). In most instances, orphaned children were removed from the almshouses and plac ed in orphanages as a means to better their health and well-being. By some accounts, while orphanages improved slightly the conditions for children, it did not offer the panacea it promised, as children still received less than standard living conditions. Walter I. Trattner says, Although these separate institutions were on the whole superior to the almshouses . they too had many defec ts (1999:114). At this time in North America, orphans remained in relatively small numbers due to the population of abandoned children. By 1850, New York State had twenty-seven orphanages and there were between 71 and 77 orphanages in the United States. Unlike almshouses, financial supports for these institutions were through state subsidized funding. By 1870, societies were looking for additional solutions to cleanup the growing number of children living on the st reets and at the same time improve the plight of neglected children (Olasky, 1996; Duplantier, 1996). During the eighteenth and ni neteenth centuries, in stitutions such as almshouses, poor farms and orphanages deve loped and evolved as societal responses to the continuing grow of homel ess children. As of 1800s, there were 17


no more than seven institutions in Amer ica for abandoned children. According to Marvin Olasky, orphanages increased duri ng the early nineteenth century in order to meet the grow ing need of abandoned children. The casualties of the Civil War greatly expanded demand for orphanages, and the number of institutions grew to over 600 by 1880 (Olasky, 1996; Trattner, 1999 and Thomas, 1972). Continued public concerns regardi ng the treatment of children in institutions, gave way to the development of foster family placement. According to Trattner (1999), the New York Chil drens Aide Society, founded in 1853 by Reverend Charles Loring Brac e instituted the first organization in America to adopt this method of placi ng children with foster fa milies instead of orphanages. However, it would be over a hundred years later before it would be socially accepted that the placement of children in foster fa mily homes would replace orphanages. One of the first severe cases of child abuse propelled into the American public conscious in 1874 was when a New York City social work discovered the abuse of Mary Ellen Wilson. Mary Elle n lived when children were considered property and the only existing anticruelty organization, The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ( ASPCA), was for animals and not children. In 1874, ASPCAs founder, Henry Bergh, and Etta Wheeler, a Methodist social worker, took steps to save Mary Ellen when no one else would. Mary Ellen was found confined to a bed, severely negl ected and brutally beaten by her 18


stepmother (Watkins, 1990; Scan napieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005; Giovannoni, 1989). While she certainly was not the first abused child in the United States, nonetheless, the news of her severe abuse prompted the development of one of the first privately organized child protective instituti ons in the country. This landmark case changed the course of child protection in America in that it highlighted the plight of abused children. Because of the media coverage on the troubles of dependent children, a small group of citizens in New York City formed the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in 1875. Due to the aid and assistance of Henry Berg, Mary Ellens case won in court, in which the caretaker was convicted of child abuse (Gelles, 1993a; Zigler and Hall, 1989). Philosophical changes in the 18 th or 19 th century began to view children as innately good and began to question the depra vity model of the past (James and Prout, 1997). Scientific advances forged a school of thought that children needed nurturing and not the harsh tr eatment of the past as a means to mold character (Trattner, 1999). However, it was not until the late 19 th century that the work of some noted philosophers and theorists that societys views were turned toward the importance of nurturing childr en and the importance of education and protection. 19


Charles Darwins ( 1809-1882) and Herbert Spen cer (1820-1903) and their contribution to biological and social evolut ion were instrumental in the way the scientific community thought about childhoo d and the role of parents. Darwins evolutionary principles, among other thi ngs, connected the role that environment and behavior played on a childs develop mental outcome. By the twentieth century, a new child psychology had emerged. Sigmund Freuds (1856-1939) work contributed to the improved stat us of children by emphasizing the importance of nurturance in infancy and childhood for the formation of healthy and productive adults (Trattner, 1994; Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005; McGee and Warms, 2000). Because of thes e scientific views, many began to rethink the role of childr en and the parents role as nurturer and protector, as well as, the role that early parenting play on overall child development. The social reform movement of the nineteenth century was concerned with not only the improving liv ing conditions for neglecte d children, but also how children were treated in the judicial system (Giovannoni and Becerra, 1979). The late nineteenth century saw the formation of the first juvenile court in Illinois in 1899 designed to address the differenc es between delinquency and neglect cases (Pfohl, 1977). Consequently, the ch ild welfare systems as a whole grew out of the mid nineteenth c entury social conscious of what to do about the growing number of abused and neglected children distin ct and apart from delinquent children. 20


Early child protection efforts were a societal construct developed to save children from abusive or neglectful parents, although often a combined effort of law enforcement and char itable endeavors. Dependent children were often removed from their homes, placed in institutions, such as almshouses, orphanages, and later foster homes, which were initially designed by the private sector (Rushton, 1996; Trattner, 1984). Du ring the 20th century, the mission of child protection in the United States changed to include not only rescuing children through state and federal legal guidelines, but also by providing funds for preserving families through the provision of social services for an array of family problems (Wissow 1995). This growing so cial concern for abused children set the stage for defining child maltreatment as a political and legislative process as well as influenced the development of social work as a profession (Giovannoni, 1989). 21


The Birth of National Legislati on on Child Abuse in America In 1909, as the media focused the public conscience on this social enigma, this event ultimately set the stage for government intervention. At the order of President Theodore Roosevelt, the White House sponsored the first conference on the Care of Dependent Childr en in America. As a by-product of this national conference, orphanages were determined not meet the best interest of dependent children. Because of this c onference, single mothers were to begin receiving financial aid so children coul d stay at home, and orphans or those completely abandoned were placed in fost er care (Costin, Karger, and Stoesz, 1996; Pfohl, 1977; and Trattner, 1999). The st ates soon took over the task that private and church run orphanages had once performed. Because of the support for child protection reform generated by t he White House Conference, the United State Childrens Bureau was establis hed in 1912 (Scannapieco and ConnellCarrick, 2005; Katz, 1996). World War I (1914-1918) and the post-wa r effect marked the beginning of the modern day orphan phenomena. The new orphans, more than ever, were the victims of unwed parents, immigrat ion, abuse, neglect and abandonment. In 1919, President Wilson held the second Whit e House Conference on the plight of Americas children (Scannapieco and Conn ell-Carrick, 2005). By 1930, the Great Depression took its toll on the economy, parenting, and family life in general. 22


Parents who were unable to provide for their children could drop them off at a church operated orphanages wit h the understanding that they would be returned to their parents when circumstances changed (Trattner, 1999; Katz, 1996). This social condition gave rise to social welfare and government subsidies to families in need. During this time, the study and practice of social work was elevated to that of a professional status although not without conflict in terms of autonomy, legitimacy and effectiveness in dealing with t he barrage of social ills affecting the times. In spite of the social workers best effort, the social and economic factors that influence poverty continued to render children and families at risk. Trattner suggests, the dependency caused by these factors demanded social and economic solutions, not casework, social or psychiatric (1999:269). The Social Security Act of 1935 prov ided the first unifying national policy and funding designed to address childr ens basic needs for food, clothing, housing and protection. This law, among other things, set the minimum standards for all children in the United States and established the aid to needy children program (Scannapieco and Conn ell-Carrick, 2005). From 1935 through 1962, a series of amendments to the Social Security Act expanded what child welfare services could be paid by federal funds, including services that supplement or substitute for parental care. In 1958, states were required to 23


provide matching funds in order to draw down their share of f ederal child welfare funds (http://www.nationalcenter.o rg/SocialSecurityAct.html). Aid for Dependent Children (AFDC) Fo ster Care Act of 1961; Public Law 87-31 expanded the Social Security Ac t of 1935 by including federal funds specifically for foster care. Federal funds became available to assist states with providing for children removed from their families because of abuse or neglect. These children were eligible if a court determined that remaining in the home was contrary to the child's welfare (Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care Program of 1961, Public Law 87-31 ) Since the 1960s, efforts to ensure that abused children are identified have increased greatly in the Un ited States. Between 1962 and 1967 all 50 states and the District of Columbia enacted laws that required professionals in law enforcement, legal, medical, education, and social services to report suspected cases of child abuse and neglect (Pfohl 1977). Consequently, the number of child abuse and neglect reports has increas ed substantially, from approximately 700,000 in 1976 to over 5 million today. Currently, each state has a toll-free telephone hotline set up to record and respond to alleged child abuse and neglect reports in accordance with federal guidelines (Gelles, 2005; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000). 24


Public concern over placement of abused children in the United States grew in the 1970s as the number of child ren placed in foster homes continued to increase. In 1974, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatm ent Act (CAPTA); Public Law 93-247 was the first national l egislation to include physical and sexual abuse along with neglect. This law provided fi scal incentives for states to create child abuse prevention programs and encouraged uniformed child abuse reporting laws. During the mid 1970s, pub lic and congressional concerns grew about the increasing number of children in foster care placements. This accelerated growth in out-of-home plac ements fueled a debate over whether or not guaranteed federal funding for foster care encouraged states to place children unnecessarily into foster care (Brooks et al., 1999 and Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005). Because of the continued escalation of children in foster care, in 1980 the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (AACWA), Public Law 96-272 placed special emphasis on reducin g the number of children in foster care and on ensuring safe and permanent living conditions for children. Because of this law, child-welfare agencies were required to doc ument their efforts to avoid out-ofhome placements, as well as their efforts to reunify children in foster care with their biological families. AACWA is the legislative foundation for todays current child welfare system. It attempts to addre ss the growing number of fo ster care placements by 25


requiring states to make reasonable efforts to eliminate the need for removal of children from their home. Mo reover, if removed, to ma ke it possible for children placed in out-of-home settings to be retur ned within a specified period. If after removal and the child(ren) can not be safely returned to their parents or a family member within a specified time frame, then proceedings should be initiated to terminate the parents rights in order to place the child(ren) for adoption. This amendment to the Social Security Act created a separate title, IV-E Foster Care and Adoption Assistance, especially to fund these two categories of child welfare services. While providing reimbursements fo r the costs of children in foster care and support for adoptive parents, the law expanded the number of protections for children in the foster care system. The 1980 law based eligibility on whether or not a child came from a family receiving AF DC or if that child came from a family eligible for AFDC. Throughout the mi d 1980s and early 1990s, Congress made numerous amendments to correct several problems with the child welfare system at the national and state level. These problems included: placement in foster care without the provision of alternative services that might help t he child remain at home; foster care placements that were too restrictive (institutional settings) and too far from home; a lack of written case plans; a lack of periodic review of cases; parents not being apprised of their child's situation; a failure to provide reunification services; 26


the creation of unnecessary bar riers to adoption for children who could not be reunited with their families; and A lack of information on the children in the system. (Public Law 96-272, 1996) In 1994, legislation directed the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) to develop a new chil d Welfare Review System, now known as Child and Family Service Reviews (CFS R). This oversight is to ensure States are adhering to legislative guidelines fo r funding requirement s. Those States found out of compliance are subject to financial sanction. In 1997, the Adoption and Safe Fam ily Act (AFSA), P.L. 105-89 was adopted into law. This federal legislati on, which built on its predecessor AACWA, sought to strengthen the time frames for how long a child could be removed from home before alternate permanency goals mu st be legally pursued. This law strengthens adoption efforts and sets a y ear limit on out-of-home placements. ASFA contained several provisions focusing on moving children more expeditiously to permanency by either reuniting the child with birth parents, finding relatives or terminating parental righ ts so that children could be placed for adoption. Those provisions include new timelines for mo ving children to permanency; modification of the reasonable efforts standards required of state programs to specify that the child's safe ty and health is paramount to other concerns when deciding the placement of a child; and the creation of adoption incentive bonuses to states that increas ed the number of adoptio n from the foster 27


care system (Brooks et al., 1999; Karger and Stoesz, 1996; Pecora, Whittaker, Maluccio and Barth, 2000; Child Welf are League of America, 2003; Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005 and USDHHS, 2001). Against this historical and political backdrop of the evolution of social change and legislation in the United States pertaining to child maltreatment, is the ever-pressing responsibility to provi de services to a growing vulnerable population. Over the past fo rty years, the number of abuse and neglect reports as well as funding for out-of-home care has escalated, yet additional funding for prevention services so that childr en can remain in their homes have been virtually non-existence. In order for some families to receive needed services their children must be adjudicated dependant by the courts and placed in foster care. Child maltreatment has become a significant health and social problem affecting a vulnerable populat ion. As the social, economic, political and religious forces continue to influence child welfare, there remains a dire need to find ways to protect abused and neglected childr en. Scannapieco and Cornell-Carrick inform us that the need of children and fa milies are often complex and thereby creates a daunting task when considering the social and environmental factors that contribute to child abuse and neglec t (2005). In order to enhance policy initiatives, one must address cross-cultural ly what is to be defined as child abuse and neglect. 28


Defining Child Abuse and Neglect Functionally based definitions of child abuse and neglect are beginning to have a more widespread application in research and public policy arenas, however no single definition has attained universal acceptance. While defining child abuse and neglect is complex, any definition must encompass the sociocultural, socio-political, and socio-ec onomic factors that influence child maltreatment along with an understanding of human social and psychological development (Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005; Sullivan, 2000). Ola Barnett et al. suggest that a defin ition of child abuse and neglect must take into account that abuse is not a static phenomenon and as a result caution us that given the multifarious nature of child abuse a definition may not be resolved in the decades to come (1993). If the consequences of using different identifying criteria can be clarified, the implications for research, policy and funding decisions for the prevention of child maltreatment can be illuminated. Sullivan suggests that the definition of child neglect influence the way the issue of child maltreatment is conceptualized for research, reporting, understanding the causes, and formulating intervention and prevention strategies (2000:7). While states vary in their definition of what constitutes child abuse, in general, most states define child maltr eatment as any non-accidental injury 29


perpetrated on a child under the age of eight een that results from the acts of commission or omission by any person in a caregiver or parental role. This definition is consistent with the Child Abuse Protection and Treatment Act (CAPTA), which is the 1974 federal legisl ative guideline that governs national child abuse policy. CAPTA d efines child abuse and neglect as any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or ca retaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or an act or failure to act, which presents an imminent ri sk of serious harm. Because d efinitions of child maltreatment vary from state to state and country to country, data are often unreliable in determining the sc ope of child abuse. Therefore m any analysts believe that statistics based on official reports do not accurately reflect the prevalence of child abuse (Gelles, 2005; Public Law 93-247). Giovannoni suggests that one of the difficulties facing child welfare workers is the inconsistent definition fo r the various subtypes of maltreatment (1989). In fact, one culture's definition of discipline may be viewed in a different culture as child abuse. For instance, my first case as a child welfare worker in Florida was an abuse report on an Asian family that practiced a cultural tradition known as coining. In many Asian count ries, coining is an indigenous healing technique used to cure illness such as a cold (Korbin, 1977). This practice requires one to heat coins and place on that outer part of the childs body that is infected. Often this technique leaves burn marks on the childs body. Because of the scarring, many traditi onal healing methods are classified as child abuse, 30


particularly when it results in what appears to be an injury or the act produces a scar. Because of the cross-cultural vari ations, some researchers suggest it is unlikely that a universally accepted def inition can be constructed (Ammerman, 1990; Hutchinson, 1997). Burgess and Garbarino (1983:88) suggest that the definition of child abuse in the abstract is much easier to accomplish, however, than its documentation in particular instances given the fact that child abuse, and particularly child death, occurs out of t he sight of the community at large and is usually only observed within the family uni t. Jody Manly suggests maltreatment is difficult to operationalize because of fa mily privacy and social stigmas around child abuse (2005). Consequently, over the pa st forty years, research has made a paradigmatic shift from focusing sole ly on the psychiatric profile of the individual to identifying the socio-psychological and socio-ecological factors that impact family interpersonal life. In e ssence, many researchers support a broad range of methodological approaches to enhancing the scientific inquiry around the causes of violence in the family (Fontes, 2005; Manl y, 2005; Dubowitz, 1999). Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick suggest child abuse and neglect are the reflection of a given societys parenting values, and that, these values change over time and space (2005:11). For inst ance, when I conducted parent-training classes and asked the question how m any participants had experienced physical 31


punishment as a child where a belt or switch was used, the overwhelming majority had experienced this form of discipline. Further many of the participants found no particular ill effect from hav ing experienced spankings. Yet, some children found in Floridas child welfare system today are from this method of parenting discipline; however, depending on ones worldview can be classified physical abuse. Andre J. Sedlak and Diane D. Broadhur st define physical abuse as injury or risk of injury as a result of being ei ther hit by hand, object, or kicked, as well as, shaken, thrown, burned, stabbed or chok ed by the primary caregiver (1996). The key word here is the extent of in jury as well as understanding the sociocultural context in which this injury o ccurred. Jill E. Korbin and David Finkelhor suggest the following cross-cultural perspective, Child abuse is the portion of harm to children that results from human ac tion that is proscr ibed, proximate, and preventable (1988:4). Due to cross-cultural variations in parenting, along with increased globalization, cultural c onflicts around child maltreat ment becomes problematic. Research that includes a broad methodolog ical approach offers an opportunity for more cost effective, cu lturally sensitive interven tion and prevention services that could enlighten local and state initiatives and policies pertaining to child maltreatment. As families continue to be plagued by poverty, substance abuse, 32


and domestic violence, as well as other ri sk factors, children become more at risk for child fatality due to maltreatment. 33


Classifications for Child Abuse While the Abuse Allegation Matrix varies from state to stat e, typically there are four broad categories commonly used to classify abuse perpetrated on children: physical, sexual, neglect and emot ional or psychological abuse. Within these broad categories are numerous subtypes. The abuse allegation matrix is a system used by states to classify types of abuse. The allegation matrix incorporates the mandates of state la ws and rules as they relate to the categorization of abuse reports. In shor t, the taxonomy of abuse classifications attempts to systemize the recording of abuse reports. Although any of the forms of child maltreatment subtypes can be f ound separately, most often they occur in combination. However, for the purposes of this discussion, only physical abuse, sexual abuse and neglect wil l be addressed. In part, this restraint is due to limiting the current discussion. According to the National Clear inghouse on Abuse and Neglect (2002) data, although the number of reports continues to escalate, the number of children verified for child abuse or neglect shows a slight reduction. The rate of victimization per 1,000 child ren in the nationa l population over the past twelve years have dropped from 13.4 children in 1990 to 12.3 children in 2002. Over sixty percent of child vict ims experienced neglect, twent y percent were physically 34


abused, ten percent were sexually abused and seven percent were emotionally maltreated. These trends are more often the case across studies as more cases of neglect are classified than any other type maltreatment (Sullivan, 2000). Physical Abuse Physical abuse generally implies physically harmf ul actions that are directed against any child less than eight een years of age. It is most often defined as injuries due to bruises, welts, burns, fractures, head injuries, stomach injuries just to name a few (CAPTA, 1974) It can be the result of intentional injury or lack of parental supervision, which is reasonably within the control of the parent or primary caretaker. Physical abus e is the most visible form of child abuse and is defined by the National Ex change Club Foundation (2000) as any non-accidental trauma or physical injury. Inflicted physical injury most often described as unreasonable, severe cor poral punishment or unjustifiable punishment all of which could have crosscultural implications. Djeddah et al. suggest, Physical abuse of a child is that which results in actual or potential physical harm from an interact ion or lack of an interaction, which is reasonably within the control of a parent or person in a position of responsibility, power or trust (2000:907). The United States Department of H ealth and Human Services (USDHHS) suggest (2000), brain injury and death ar e the most common consequences of severe physical abuse. This usually o ccurs when a frustrated parent strikes, 35


shakes or throws a child. The USDHHS (200 2) state that twent y-eight percent of all child deaths were due to physical abuse and that forty-four pe rcent of the child victims were under age one. Physical abuse, while the most descriptive, at least in terms that it can be clinically diagnosed, is the one area many researchers mostly can agree on what defines physical abuse. In 1999, Floridas leading cause of child death was fatal gunshot wound. Thirteen children died because of gun wounds, yet only three were the result of a murder-suicide committed by their father The remaining gunshot deaths were attributed to inappropriate access to firearms This is in contrast to the leading cause of deaths in 1998, which were severe beatings and multiple body traumas as opposed to drowning deaths in 2000. However, suffice it to say, there remain some ambiguity based on culture and societal expectations particularly when it comes to a univer sal definition of physical abuse. For example, corporal punishment is an area of discourse. Spanking or any type of physical discipline garners a great debate on what constitute physical abuse (Baumrind, 1994; Ellison et al., 1996; Straus, 1991). Maria Scannapieco and Kelli Cornell-Carrick suggest that the injury in and of itself is not enough to classify the incident as child abuse, rather it is important that we look at multiple factors such as childs level of development, pattern and size of injury, location of the injury and the caregivers explan ation of the injury (2005:13). The literature is clear that physical abuse can have a profound 36


influence on a childs physical, emotional and intellectual functioning and that those affects might not be ameliora ted with age (Belsky and Vondra, 1989; Berger, 2001). Sexual Abuse Sexual abuse is defined as the involvement of a child in any sexual activity that he or she is unable, based on age, to give informed consent as mandated by States statutes and laws governing child ab use. Further, it is the involvement of a dependent, developmentally immature child or adolescent in sexual activities that they do not fully comprehend or that violate social taboos of family roles. Sexual abuse may include the following subtypes: fondling, the showing of private parts by an adult, sexual intercourse oral and anal sex, forcing a child to watch while others have sexual intercour se, incest, and child pornography. It is important to distinguis h between sexual molestation and incest. Sexual molestation involves the sexual abuse of a child by a non-relative, while incest refers to sexual abuse by an indi vidual within a specified degree of consanguinity. The National Center on Child Abus e and Neglect asserts, Sexual abuse of children, especially in cases of ince st, is perhaps one of the least understood, and, consequently most mishandled form of child mistreatmen t. Many times, more harm is caused to the child by the systems handling of the sexual abuse 37


investigation as the trauma associated wit h the sexual abuse act itself (Federal Register 1978:3244). Sexual abuse garner s the greatest consensus about the seriousness of this type of child maltr eatment. This consensus reflects social norms that the sexual abuse of children is a violation of many societal taboos. Even though many children die each year of physical abuse at the hand of their primary caregivers, it rarely warrants major media coverage. However, when a child is sexually abused and murdered by a non-caregiver, the media is on full alert as indicated by recent highly publ icized child abduction, rape and murder cases in the media. Unquestionably, t he media plays an important role in educating the public; however, a major criticism is that it tends to focus on child abuse stories that excite t he audience (Goddard and Sanders, 2001). While the long-term implications of sexual abuse on children are not fully understood, current research suggests a st rong correlation between child sexual abuse and late life psychological and emotional trauma (Scannapieco and Connell-Carrick, 2005; Finkelhor, 1990 and Briere, 1989). Some researchers have found significant associations betw een child sexual abuse and higher rates of major depression, anxiety disorder conduct disorder, substance abuse and suicidal behavior (Brown et al., 1 999; Mannarino and Cohen, 1996; and BoneyMcCoy and Finkelhor 1995). Child sexual abuse involving penetration was associated with the highest risk for any disorder (Fleming et al. 1999) However, it is noteworthy to know 38


there are no specific disor ders that are symptomatic of childhood sexual abuse. It is not known why some children are deeply affected by sexual abuse, while others show no sign of traum a. One notable difference fo r sexual abuse victims is that females are far more likely reported as victims than males, as rates for physical and neglect remains relatively similar across gender (USDHHS, 2002). Neglect Isabel Wolock and Bernard Horowitz (1984) coined the phrase the neglect of neglect where they suggest that child neglect is largely ignored by both child welfare professionals and the media. While child maltre atment in general has been under scientific inquiry since the 1960s, yet the most prevalent form of child maltreatment, neglect, has not been sufficiently investigated (Wang and Daro, 1997). Neglect is a particularly difficult c onstruct given that it is based on the observers perceived harm to a child and the caretaker accountable for that harm (Gough 2005:44). Neglect is the failure of the parent or primary caretaker to provide for the overall development of the child. This in volves all areas of care such as health, education, emotional nutrition, shelter and safe living environment. Neglect becomes an epistemological problem when we examine child neglect cross-culturally. Who is to say what outside forces influence what is to be 39


perceived as child neglect. For instance, natural disasters, war, disease or drought could cause parents to be negl ectful; however, when poverty affects families rarely is it perceived as the cause of neglect. C. Henry Kempe (1978:7) states, Neglect implies the failure of a parent to act properly in safeguarding the health, safety, and well-being of the child. Within this category, there are many opportunities for variation in interpretations of neglect, particularly when social and economic factors are taken into consideration. One interpreter may label failure to seek medical attention to a childhood illness as medical neglect and yet another would not. Yet the result is influenced by a societys value structur e. For instance, many abuse reports involving neglect centers on lack of food, hazardous conditions, and inadequate supervision. Howard Dubowitz et al. (1993: 12) suggest, Neglect is understood to exist on a continuum ranging from optimal to extremely harmf ul conditions for children. Finally, neglect is seen as a heterogeneous phenomenon, varying in type, severity and chronicity. Like ot her categories for child maltreatment, CAPTA provides an over arching definitio n. CAPTA suggests any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of se rious harm. However, Scannapieco and Cornell-Carrick suggest it lacks precision, dimensionality, and op erationalization (2005:14). 40


Drowning is the second leading cause of child death in the United States and the number one cause for children und er age five, yet not all drowning deaths are the subject of an abuse reports. Further, child drowning more often than not takes place in home swimming pool s. During my internship, there were several cases where child drowning was t he cause of death. It was particularly notable that the Death Review Team expr essed more sympathy in some cases. In one case, the caregiver was the mate rnal grandmother and wa s from a middle class background. In the other case, the primary caregiver was the mother and she was from a low socio-economic status. In the first case, a sibling group (two children) died one year apart each at age two in the family above ground pool. Yet, when the first child died, the second child was not removed. The cause of death was classified as drowning. This case garnered a great deal of sympathy from the Child Abuse Deat h Review Team (CADRT). In the second case, the child drowned in an in-gr ound pool of the home where her parents were renters, not only was the case classified as neglect due to inadequate supervision, but one of the CADRT participants stated, the family should not have rented a house that they could not afford t he upkeep on the pool. The pool was not maintained and as a result made finding t he child victim difficult due to the murkiness of the pool water. The remain ing children in the home were removed due to inadequate supervision. This differ ence in perception suggests that the definition of child neglec t, whereas drowning is concerned, may be economically induced, as one of the distinguishing diffe rences in the two cases was that one 41


was from a middle class background and t he other family was from a lower socio-economic status. Child supervision is an area of neglect that varies depending on ones perception. At what age are younger children able to supervise themselves? How old do you have to be to provide adequate supervision to younger siblings? These type of issues affect cross-cult ural interpretations. The assessment of child neglect requires the consideration of cultural values and standards of care as well as the recognition that the inabilit y to provide the necessities of life may be poverty related. The failure to addre ss the impact of socio-economics on child neglect will omit a key fact or that heightens risk of child maltreatment due to poverty. Although child neglect has been conceptualized as a distinct form of child maltreatment since the early 1960s (Young, 1964), and, as result of Public Law 93-247 that require states to include it in their child abuse allegation matrix, it is an area of maltreatment t hat requires further scientif ic inquiry. The multiple definitions found in the liter ature make it especially di fficult to advance scientific knowledge since comparison across studies is problematic (Zuravin, 1999; Sullivan, 2000). The theoretic al and operational difficultie s in defining neglect are well-documented (Berrick, 1997; Dubo witz, et al., 1999; Giovannoni, 1989; NCCAN, 1987; Wolock and Horowitz, 1984; Zuravin, 1999, and Gough, 2005) 42


and cut across all disciplines that encount er child neglect research (USDHHS, 1995). Unlike physical and sexual abuse, w here the act determines maltreatment, in neglect the absence of an act determi nes maltreatment, which is open to subjectivity and further adds to variabili ty and inconsistent definitions. Gaudin (1999) suggests that many studies of dev elopmental effects fail to differentiate between neglect and other types of maltreat ment or combinations of neglect and abuse (Aber, Allen, Carlson and Cicche tte, 1989). Further, most studies of neglect lack a clear, consistent concept ual and operational def inition of neglect and seldom differentiate among subtypes of neglect (Zauravin, 1999; Gaudin 1999). The states legislative definitions of neglect vary across the United States, which complicates scientific comparisons. So me states exclude deprivation if due to poverty, while others make no such exceptions. 43


Risk Factors The focus of child welfare services and researchers prior to 1960 was primarily prevention. Yet, due to the gr owing problem of child abuse and neglect, prevention and intervention have become researchers primary concerns. The combination of prevention and intervention are strategies used to identify early warming signs and thereby prevent r eoccurrence. Further, assessing risk attempts to address the generational cycl es of abuse. This operates on the premise that without adequat e intervention services, abuse can be transferred from generation to generation. Cyril Greenla nd suggests that it is important to note that the concept of high risk has no stat us in law, therefore the role of child welfare and the legal system is to define the precise ci rcumstances in which risk exist and therefore warr ants court ordered intervention services (1987). Child abuse and neglect by all accounts is the result of many factors often occurring at the same time. The combinat ion of elements called risk factors, increase the likelihood of abuse. Bill Gillham et al. (1998) argue the notion that child abuse results from a complex combination of personal, cultural and societal factors. While there are differing schools of thought on the origin and cause of child maltreatment, some theorists suggest that the root causes of child abuse rest within four principal domains: the child, the family, the community, and the 44


society. Carol Djeddah et al. (2000:909), suggest that risk factors surround the individual, the family, the community and t he society. Further, that abuse is more likely to occur when risk factors outweigh protective factors. The World Health Organization (WHO) reminds us that usi ng singular factor risk based model can mislead labeling, stigmatization and ma rginalization. WHO suggests no single risk factor is sufficient to predict being abused or becoming an abuser, and therefore prevention is most likely to be effective if it targets multiple levels of risk simultaneously (2006). WHO offers the following diagram for a multilevel risk factor approach. Table 1: Multilevel Risk Factors The World Health Organization, Report on the Consultation of Child Abuse Prevention, 1999a 45


Societal Level Risk Factors Perhaps the least understood and studied level of child maltreatment is that of the societal fact ors that impact enhanced risk of child abuse. Ecological theories postulate that fact ors such as the narrow l egal definitions of child maltreatment, the social a cceptance of violence, and political or religious views that value noninterference in families above all may be associated with child maltreatment (Tzeng, Jackson, and Karl son, 1991; Zigler and Hall, 1989). Lisa Fontes suggests that in order to fully examine child abuse, one must examine child abuse from an ecosystemic model by considering all the systems, that is, the individual, the family, the community and society as a whole, in which children are embedded (2005:17). Poverty is the most frequently and persistently noted risk factor for child abuse. Poverty, for instanc e, has been linked with ma ltreatment, particularly neglect, in each of the national incidenc e studies (Sedlak and Broadhurst, 1996), and has been associated with child negl ect (Black, 2000) and found to be a strong predictor of subst antiated child maltreatment (Lee and Goerge 1999). While children in families from all inco me levels are potential victims of child maltreatment, research suggests that fa mily income is strongly related to incidence rates (Baumrind, 1994). Nati onal data suggest children from lowincome families that are below poverty leve ls are far more likely to be harmed or endangered by abuse or neglect than children from higher socio-economic 46


families (Charlow, 2001; Berger, 2005; Waldfogel, 2005; Paxson and Waldfogel, 1999; Innocenti Report, 2003). This is c onsistent with Floridas data where children from lower socioeconomic levels represent the largest population in the states child welfare system. Further, t hat the correlation between poverty and maltreatment is disproportionately represented based on race (Charlow, 2001; Berger, 2005). According to Andrea Charlow, poverty and neglect is an area that needs further scientific inquiry. Charlow (2001: 789) suggests, Much more work needs to be done to understand the causes and effects of poverty and neglect and how to obviate the negative effects of each on children. Fontes (2005:18) states, When caretakers have fewer resources, it is simply harder to provide children with what they need; there is less margin for error. Whether this connection is precipitated by the stress of poverty re lated conditions or results from greater scrutiny of poor people by pub lic agencies, which results in a disproportion of over-reporting, is highly debated (Charlow, 2001). Nevertheless, the research suggests poverty correlates to increased ri sk of child maltreatment. According to Charlow, African-Americans have the highest rates of substantiated neglect, which is consistent with the correlation between poverty and negl ect and the high proportion of African-Americans living in poverty (2001:776). However, it is important to note t hat while there is a strong correlation between poverty and child maltreatment, and in particular negl ect, it is not necessarily a cause and effect relation. (Gil, 1970). 47


Based on my twenty-five years in Ch ild Welfare, the reporting of physical abuse and neglect are more common among people who are at the poorest end of the socio-economic ladder. Many of my clients mostly lacked adequate housing, employability, affordable childcare and a diminished family support system. Other notable societal factors include inaccessible and unaffordable health care, fragmented social services and a lack of sup port from extended families and communities (Dubowitz et al. 1993). At the societal level, risk is tied to the societal view on what is considered the social or cultural norm. For exampl e, children in Sierra Leone are the victims of forced fosterage where abuse is common, yet it is socially accepted as a means of upward mobility (Bledsoe 1990). In some societies, it may be acceptable to sell children into slavery or forced sexual expl oitation. In other societies, infanticide at the hands of unwed mothers or burning childrens hands for stealing is socially accepted in Keny a (Kilbride 1992). Societys views play an instrumental role in shaping ones be liefs, values and customs around child rearing practices and what is consider ed child abuse and neglect. Some of the most powerful factors are t hose specific to the culture and society in which a family lives. There is also the question of accountability of society as well as the parent for the inadequacy of care that children receiv e (Dubowitz, Black, Starr and Zuravin, 1993). 48


Some could argue that society does not really value its children. This assertion is highlighted by the fact that one in four ch ildren in the United States lives in poverty, and many children do not have any form of health insurance (WHO, 1999b). The presence of high levels of violence in our society is also thought to contribute to child abuse. D eadly violence is more common in the United States than in seventeen other developed countries. Seventy-five percent of violence occurring in this country is domestic violence (Innocenti Report, 2003). Trevor Hays and Lesley Jones (1994) argue that the Unit ed States leads developed countries in homicide rates fo r females older than fourteen years and for children from five to fourteen years of age. Many experts debate whether a presumed reduction in religious and moral values coupled with an increase in the depiction of violence by the entertain ment and informational media plays a significant role in the increased rate of child abuse (Ellison, et al. 1996; Djeddah et al. 2000; Goddard and Sanders, 1999; Goddard and Sanders; 2001). Community Level Risk Factors Factors related to the community le vel risk factors are linked to both the role of family in the greater community and the communitys view on the value and role of children. The lack of support systems or social networks can increase the risk of child abuse, particularly when combined with other risk factors. Parents who live in isolation can place children at higher risk for child abuse. Research suggests that social isolati on and the lack of family and friends can 49


place children and families at great er risk for abuse. Bishop and Leadbeater (1999) found that abusive mot hers reported fewer friends in their social support networks, less contact with friends, and lo wer ratings of quality support received from friends. Building social support s through capacity building methods and analyzing social networks for families is one area of research where anthropology could offer new insights on build ing protective factors for families at risk of abuse. Victoria L. Banyard et al (2003) indicate that a strong support system can ameliorate stress from social and personal circumstances and enhance parents coping skills, thereby incr ease protective factors to the child and family. Childrearing practices often depend on t he communitys cultural value of children. For instance, some cultures view child as property while others cherish them as extensions of self conseq uently depending on the view parenting practices vary. Djeddah et al. state, Gener ally, cultures in which children are nurtured contrast with those in whic h they are seen as being possession (2000:910). Jeanne M. Giovannoni and Andrew Billingsley (1970) study of neglect in poor families in San Francisco highlighted differences within a population of mothers in pover ty. Families below poverty level were more often linked to child abuse. Charlow (2001) argues that family income was the most predictive factor of child placement in fo ster care. Violence is another community level variable found to be associated with high rates of child maltreatment. Djeddah et al. (2000:910) state, The widespread use of severe physical 50


punishment and accepted high level of community violence are correlated to higher abuse levels. Family Level Risk Factors Prior studies have indicat ed that multiple factors c ontribute to the risk of child abuse at the family level (Tomkiewicz, 1998). Family level risk factors that have been identified ar e domestic violence, lack of stable housing, economic stress, marital discord or divorce, signi ficant losses and prior history of abuse against other children in the family. Other factors found to increase family level risk are parents engagement in subst ance abuse, parents mental health stability, and the parents level of education and past criminal history. The mission of child protection agencies is to reduce family risk factors by providing referral service to lower risk and provide protection for children at risk. Djeddah et al. (2000:910) suggest, Abuse o ccurs where there is a lack of equilibrium between risk and protective factor s, where, for example, there is an increase of risk factors in a family but no equivalent increase in protective factors. Korbin suggest et al. (1998:216) suggest, Child maltreatment occurs as a result of an imbalance of protective and potentiating factors across ecological levels. Services to families typically focus on ways to assure child safety by creating greater visibility at the community level thr ough daycare referrals, in51


home counseling, in-home visitation pr ogram, inor out-patience substance abuse treatment and domestic violence intervention services. Substance abuse is a notable risk factor at the family le vel that has shown a connection to a high rate of incident of child maltreatment in families. Families experiencing substance abuse issues are more likely to experience child abuse as well as elevated risk for abuse due to the parents ability to provide adequate supervision (Ammerman et al., 1999; Besinger et al., 1999; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004). Although identifying families with substance abuse issues can present a challenge when assessing risk, current research suggests that substance abuse is a critical family risk factor. Child Welfare League of America ( 2003) suggests that in the United States substance abuse is a contributing factor in forty to eighty percent of families where children are abuse victim s. The USDHHS national data suggest that of all the child abuse cases, fifty to eighty percent involve some degree of substance abuse by the child's parent s. The Foundation for Children of Alcoholics (1996) state, an estimated fo rty percent of confirmed child abuse cases in the United States are related to substance abuse. According to Blau et al., approximately eleven percent of pr egnant women in the United States are substance abusers, and that 300,000 infant s are born each year to mothers who abuse crack cocaine (1996). Additionally, Gary Blau et al. suggest that children of substance abusing parents or caregivers are four times more likely to be 52


mistreated, almost five times more likely to be physically neglected, and ten times more likely to be emotionally neglected than children in non-alcohol abusing families (1996). Another factor associated with increased risk for child maltreatment is the emotional maturity of the parents, which is often highly correlated to actual age of the parent or caregiver. Ta mmy L. Dukewich et al. suggest that there is a strong correlation between adolescent parents and increased risk of child maltreatment (1996). Additionally, current research i ndicates that childhood maltreatment can lead to generational child abuse perpetuation over time, thereby perpetuating the cycle of child abuse (Clarke et al. 1999; Bandura, 1977 and Daro, 1998). David DiLillo et al. (2000) found that childhood sexual abus e increased the risk of an adult to commit physical abuse on children. In essence, parents who were abused as children are more likely to abuse their children than parents without childhood history of maltr eatment. Furthermore, domestic violence, inadequate parenting skills and a lack of effective communication skills further enhance the risks of maltreatment to children. Heightened family stress and the disintegration of the nuclear family and its inherent support systems have been held to be associated with increase child maltreatment. The National Research Council (1993) purpor ts that single parenthood and the many bur dens and hardships of parenting, particularly without substantive support, can add to t he parenting stress index and provide an 53


environment for increased child neglect. Fi nally, the general inherent stress of parenting, which when combined with the pressure of any one or a combination of risk factors previously mentioned, ma y exacerbate any difficult situation and thereby set the stage for elevated risk of child maltreatment. Individual/Child Level Risk Factors At the individual level, studies have shown that a parents past history as a victim of child abuse plays a significant role in their abilities to be effective parents (Kaufman and Zigler, 1987). Additiona lly, Rachelle Tyler et al. (1997) found that substance abuse adver sely influences risk at the individual level. Mark Chaffin et al. (1996) suggest that a parents past life experience and mental health issues can increase risk. Although children cannot be held per sonally responsible for the abuse inflicted upon them, however, there are certain child char acteristics that increase the risk or the potential for maltreatment. For example, it has been noted that children with disabilities or mental retar dation are considerably more likely to be abused (Crosse, Kaye, and Ratnofsky, 1993; Schilling and Schinke, 1984). Jocelyn Brown suggests that children born prematurely or with low birth rates as well as families where a sibling younger than eighteen months is already present 54


in the home raises the risk levels for children to be possible victims of abuse (1995). Diane DePanfilis et al. (1994) suggest that any situation where one sibling has been reported to child protective se rvices for suspected abuse heightens the likelihood of increased risk. Evi dence suggests that age and gender are predictive risk factors for child maltreat ment. For instance, younger children are more likely to be neglected, while the risk for sexual abuse increases with age (Mraovick and Wilson, 1999). In my Child Welfare experience, females were significantly more likely than males to experience sexual abuse (Sedlak and Broadhurst, 1996). While it is generally accepted that a va riety of factors contribute to gender related violence, He ise et al. (1994) suggest that the cultural, political, legal and economic systems do not empower women or take gender inequities into consideration. 55


Protective Factors Researchers, practitioners, and po licy makers are now increasingly investigating protective factors within children and families that can reduce risks, build family capacity, and foster resilience. This modality shift, at least in part, stems from the idea that children that experience si milar maltreatment do not respond in the same adverse manner. Res ilience, which has also been referred to as stress resistance (Garmezy, 1985) or post-traum atic growth (Tedeschi et al, 1998), refers to a pattern of adaptive functioning despite exposure to one or more risk factors (Masten, 2001). Patricia J. Mrazek and Davi d A. Mrazek (1987) state resilience in maltreated children rela te to a child's ability to recognize danger and adapt. Current research cont inues to examine the relationship between child and family risk factors and protec tive factors. Researchers seek to unlock the factors that appear to protect children from the risks of maltreatment. In a recent overview by the Family Support Network (2002), factors that may protect children from malt reatment include a combinat ion of child factors, parent/family factors, and soci al/environmental factors. Typically, across studies, resilie nce is often defined in terms of interpersonal functioning based on a comb ination of a positive self-esteem and an absence of clinical symptoms, particu larly depression and/or anxiety. In a 56


study conducted by Liem et al. (1997) a sample study of 145 urban college student survivors of child sexual abuse, twenty-eight percent tested positive for resilience based on their interpersonal func tioning. Liem et al. found individual personal characteristics, family characte ristics, and the severity of the abuse all notably contributed to the likelihood of a resilient outcome (1997). In a similar study of resilience with a low-income sa mple, Banyard (1999) found that higher social support and greater personal control in problem solving correlated to improve functioning. Sarah E. Romans et al. (1995), utilizing self-esteem and psychiatric morbidity as outcome variables, suggest that a number of factors (personal, familial, social, school, sports, and work -related) influenced resilient outcomes. While there is no all-inclusive or exhausti ve list, current research suggests that among the child factors that promot e resilience include connections to component and caring adults in the family and community, an internal locus of control, positive self-esteem, and motiva tion to be effective in the environment (Garmezy, 1985; Luthar, 2003 and Masten et al., 1999). Recent studies indicate parent and family protective factors that may protect children include secure attachment with children, parental reconciliation with their own childhood history of abuse, supportive family environment, household rules and monitoring of the child, extended family support, parents 57


with stable relationship, family expectations of pro-social behavior, and high parental education (Lerm an, 2002; Masten, 2001). Social and environmental risk factors that may protect children include middle to high socioeconomic status, acce ss to health care and social services, consistent parental employment, adequate housing, family participation in a religious faith, good schools, and supportive adults outside the family who serve as role models or mentors (Famil y Support Network, 2002). Lerman (2002), found that families with two marri ed parents encounter more stable home environments, fewer years in poverty, and diminished material hardship. Masten (2001:227) suggests, resilience appears to be a common phenomenon that results in most cases from the operat ion of basic human adaptational systems. 58


The International Perspective Over the past decade or so, the in ternational community has concerned itself specifically with the growing condition of children worldwide who are victims of child maltreatment, alt hough their concern for the right s of children in general spans back to the early 20 th century. Among the international organizations that have weighed in on the issue are the Wo rld Health Organiza tion (WHO), the International Society for the Preventi on of Child Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN), and United Nations International Childr ens Emergency Fund (UNICEF). In many countries, the issue of child abuse has resulted from the activism of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), childr en rights activists or local community struggles. Because of these forces, a consolidated research effort around these issues has ensued. Based on international data (UNI CEF Innocenti Report, 2003), almost 3,500 children under the age of 15 die from maltreatment worldwide every year in industrialized nations. The risk of death for children under one is three times greater than for children between one and four. Children one year to four years are twice likely to die of maltreatment t han children five to fourteen. International data suggests that 35% of the children die from n eglect, 28% from physical abuse, 22% from both physical abuse and negl ect and 15% die as the result of 59


other causes. The perpetrators of abuse and neglect are 41% biological fathers, 39% biological mothers, 11% stepfather s, 4% stepmothers and 5% other, which includes other relatives, foster and adoptive parents. While these trends can be found at the international, national and state levels, however inconsistent classification, common definitions and research methodologies makes comparisons worldwide challenging. According to the UNICEF Innocenti Report (2003), children raised in the United States, Mexico, and Portugal have the greatest chances of dying from abuse or neglect among the 27 industrialized nations that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Children in the southern European countries of Spain, Greece, and Italy are the least likely to suffer maltreatment according to the study, which found that an average of 0.2 per million in those countries had died fr om abuse or neglect annually over the last five years. The death rate was sli ghtly higher in Ireland and Norway, which is about 0.3 per million annually. In the Netherlands and Sweden, the death rate was twice that of Norway and Ireland at about 0.6 per million each year. Yet the reported rates of child deaths were higher in South Korea, Australia, Germany, Denmark, and Finland, t he average was about 0.8 per million (UNICEF Innocenti Report, 2003). By comparison, the death rate in t he United States, according to UNICEF, was three times higher, at 2.4 per million, while in Mexi co, it came to 3.0 per 60


million and in Portugal, the highest, 3.7 per million childr en. These findings do not take into consideration the lack of a uniform methodology for determining maltreatment or even the cause of deat h as well as iniquity in reporting requirements. The report found that pov erty and stress, along with substance abuse, appear to be the factors most cl osely and consistently associated with child abuse and neglect worldwide (Innocenti Report 2003). The Innocent Report found that child maltreatm ent decreases with the ri se of family income. While there are several countries (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) have laws explicitly prohibiting physical punishment, only Norway along with Spain, Greece, Italy, and Ireland are among the countries with exceptionally low rate s of child death incidence. The United States, Mexico and Portugal are among t he industrialized nations that have exceptionally high rates (between 10 to 15 times higher) of child deaths. The research suggests that the countries with low rates of child death also have lower rates of adult deaths. Conversely, nati ons with high child abuse deaths also report higher adult death rates (UNICEF Innocenti Report, 2003). The UNICEF Innocenti Report (2003) found race, class, poverty, single parenting, and unemployment, along with, domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health issues, social isolation and prior history of child maltreatment appear to be some of the risk factors cl osely and consistently associated with child abuse and neglect worldwide. Although t he extent of child abuse is difficult 61


to measure, it is recognized as a major social problem, especially in industrialized nations. It occurs in all income, racial, religious, and ethnic groups and in urban and rural communities. It is however, more pervasive in some groups, especially those below the poverty line worldwide (Cicchetti and Carlson, 1989). Sebre et al. (2004) notes in a cro ss-cultural study of fourth and seventh graders in the former soviet block countri es of Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, and Moldova that alcohol abuse and living in rural areas were identified as the dominant risk factors for child abuse in these countries. 62


The National Perspective It was not until the 1960s that the issue began to become one of general social concern. Kempe et al. (1962) in an examination of a ch ild severely beaten and neglected coined the term battered child syndrome in an article in the Journal of the American Medical Associat ion. The battered child syndrome is a clinical condition with diagnosable physical and medical symptoms. Additionally, it is defined as children who have been delib erately injured by physical assault by a parent or primary caretaker. Kempe et al. (1962) sparked the beginning of public and professional interest in what would later become child abuse, child abuse and neglect, and child maltreatment. Nationally, more children suffer fr om neglect than any other form of maltreatment. Approximately 53 percent of victims in 1998 suffered neglect, 22 percent physical abuse, 12 percent sexual abuse, 6 percent emotional maltreatment, 2 percent medical negl ect and 5 percent other forms of maltreatment. Some children suffer more than one type of maltreatment. Child abuse and neglect affects children of all ages, although the types of abuse vary by age and sex. Approximately 52 percent of victims are fe male and 48 percent males. In 1998, nationally approximately 1,100 children died because of abuse or neglect. 63


Since the 1960s, the United States have increased efforts to ensure adequate reporting, identification, and intervention services for abused children. From 1962 to 1967, all 50 stat es and the District of Columbia enacted legislation that encouraged professionals to report suspected cases of child abuse and neglect. In 1974, CAPTA made child ab use reporting mandatory for medical personnel, teachers, childcare workers, social workers, and law enforcement. This action substantially increased the number of reported ca ses of abuse and neglect nationwide. From the early 1970' s when the national child abuse data bank was created, the yearly number of reports of child abuse has risen progressively. Initially, 700,000 incidents of child abuse were reported annually. Between 1985 and 1993, the number of cases of child abuse in the United States increased by 50 percent (Child Welfare League of America, 2003). In 1998, according to U.S. Department of H ealth and Human Services, there were approximately three million cases of child abuse reported in the United States. Because of continued public concern, the number of children reported as abused or neglected has increased substantiall y (Gelles, 2005; Child Welfare League of America, 2003). Currently there are over 5 million cases reported ev ery year in the United States. Although not all repor ts of alleged child abuse are substantiated, most authorities believe that a large under reporti ng bias is inherent in the data (Crume 64


et al, 2002; Herman-Giddens et al., 1999). Ther e is consensus that far more child abuse occurs than is reported. While this heightened awareness has added greater protection potentiall y for children, on the other hand, greater reporting without clear definitions aids in an even greater burden on overworked child welfare agencies. To address some of the inherent di agnosis and reporting inconsistencies of child fatalities at the national level and local levels, multidisciplinary Child Fatality Review Teams have emerged to provide a coordinated approach to the investigation of child deaths. These teams, which now exist at the state and local levels in every state and the District of Columbia, are comprised of prosecutors, coroners or medical examiners, law enf orcement personnel, Child Protective Service (CPS) workers, public health care providers, and others. Child fatality review teams offer many benefits, including improved interagency communication, identification of gaps in community child protection systems, and the development of data information systems that can gui de agency policy and practice (National Center on Child Fatality Review, 2003). 65


The State Perspective This history of child welfare in Fl orida has a unique beginning. During the calendar years 1998, 1999 and 2000 in Flor ida, there were 297, 288 and 331 child deaths respectively where a child died because of alleged abuse or neglect by their caregivers. After further investi gation, it was determined that there were no indicators that maltreatment was a fa ctor in the majori ty of the deaths, however there were findings of death due to abuse or neglect in 86 cases in 1998, 85 cases in 1999 and 95 cases in 2000. Over the past twenty years, ther e have been several highly publicized child deaths and/or disappearances becaus e of abuse or neglect. These children had previously received child protective services from the Florida Department of Children and Families. Corey Greer, Jo shua Collins, Bradley McGee, Kayla McClean and Rilya Wilson, just to name a few, are some of the children that focused state and national attention to the plight of child deaths in the Floridas child welfare system, and, because of thei r deaths altered state policy. Chris Goddard and Bernadette J. Sanders (2001) not e that the media plays a critical role in educating the public on the pr evalence of child abuse and thereby contributes to defining what constitutes child abuse. As a result, media has often played a significant role in influencing child welfare policy and practice. Because of the medias attention to the aforem entioned child deaths, a number of state 66


policies were instituted. M edia attention after the deat h of Corey Greers created placement polices. Kayla McClean and Rilya Wilson deaths had state child protection laws named in their honor, wh ile Joshua and Bradley forced changes in the States family reunification procedures. Many researchers have suggested t hat child abuse has reached epidemic proportions worldwide (UNICEF Innoc enti Report, 2003; Dj eddah, 2000). Having worked in the child welfare system for ov er twenty-five year s, I can testify firsthand that the problem of child abuse and neglect is a real problem in Florida. In a review of child deaths in Fl orida for 1999, the aggregate data report approximately 62% of child deaths were the result of physical abuse and 38% from neglect. This percentage is consistent for reporting years 1995 1999 in Florida, except child fatality data from 2000 only 47% were attributed to physical abuse and 53% to neglect. While compar ing national and state data is problematic due to definitions and reporti ng methodologies, it is notable that Floridas data is inconsistent with Nati onal statistics on child deaths due to abuse and neglect as the nationa l data suggest a higher physical abuse rate while Floridas data suggest a slightly hi gher neglect rate for child deaths. The Florida child welfare system is charged with the statutory responsibility to manage child abuse cases. Conversely, an understanding of child abuse as a societal problem with many facets suggests that no one person or discipline can effectively manage child abuse and neglect. All disciplines, as 67


well as society as a whole, must work together to play an active role in recognition, treatment and prevent of abuse. In 1999 in line with national legislat ion, Florida Legisl ature mandated the establishment of a statewide multidis ciplinary, multi-agency child abuse death assessment and prevention system that c onsisted of state and local review committees. This law, Florida Statutes 383.402, established State and local level abuse death review teams. The function of the Child Abuse Death Review Teams (CADRT) is to better understand the causes of child deaths, identify service delivery improvements that will pr omote safe and healthy development of children, provide a uniform death repor ting system and reduce preventable child abuse deaths. The CADRT is a multidisciplinary group of individuals that review the facts and circumstances of child abuse or negl ect deaths with a particular focus on those cases with prior abuse history wher e the childs death was classified as verified for abuse or neglect. In 1999, twenty-nine ch ild deaths met the mandated requirement for review. The CADRT was legislated to review the specific circumstances surrounding each death and to evaluate the Department of Children and Families (DCF) abilities to prevent fatal maltreatment in each. Since 1999, death review committees were es tablished, or, are in the process of being established in each of the fifteen di stricts that comprise the Florida child welfare system. The death review committees are comprised of individuals from 68


various professions as well as concer ned citizens who share an interest in improving the health and welfar e of children in Florida. According to CADRT, of the 288 child deaths in Florida in 1999, eighty-five children died as a result of abuse and neglect, however only twenty-nine of those deaths were verified for abuse and were found to have had prior abuse history with DCF. This represents approximately on e third of the children that died. National statistics documents that m any children suffer numerous beatings before dying. This suggests that there was an opport unity for a number of individuals to have intervened prior to t heir death. The opinion at the time was that DCF in some way failed to protect t hose children. Yet, according to the Child Welfare League of America (1997 ), the prior reports on ch ild victims are not very reliable predictors of child deaths. Particularly since many of the cases that had prior reports were not statistically diffe rent from the thous ands of other child abuse reports. The question is w hat are the factors of each prior report that each of the child victims shares in common. 69


The Local (SunCoast Region) Perspective Based on oral histories, the historical trajectory of child welfare at the local level began in the early 1960s and was bor n out of a judicial concern for the welfare of children. In both Pinellas and Hillsborough c ounties, the root of the child welfare system was because of the death of a child at the hand of their primary caregiver and the publics concern about the protection of children in the community. Because of the public outcry, t he first child protective services were court ordered and funded through the county. Lat er, the State of Florida provided some positions from the Aid for Depende nt Children (AFDC) program, which established the first state funded child protective services unit. By 1968, the state assumed funding and operational responsibility for child welfare in Florida. As funding through state and feder al sources became more available, the child welfare system grew to address the gr owing number of child abuse reports. By the 1970s, the local child welfar e program, in conjunction with the states child welfar e initiatives, evolved to include mandatory r eporting. State protective investigation st aff was given statut ory authority to remove children and a centralized 24-hour abuse-reporting registry was created. Throughout the 1980s, child welfare in Flor ida underwent a number of organizational changes in an effort to address the rising number of abuse and neglected children. This time saw changes in record keeping, finger prin ting and the role of politics in child 70


welfare as during this time the Head of the local child welfare offices were now appointed by the Secretary of Division of children and families. In addition to structural and operational changes, child welfare in Florida also changed its name to reflect current philosophies. First, the Department of Welfare, then Division of Family Services, to the D epartment of Health and Rehabilitative Services to finally the Department of Children and Families. In 1999, in order to comply with new Florida Legislation, the local child welfare agency formed a Child Death Re view Team. The existing committee is composed of the Medical Examiner, Child Protection Team, County Health Department, Department of Children and Families, State Attorneys Office, local law enforcement agency as well as other community agencies engaged in child protection. The Chairperson posses t he statutory authority to appoint other professionals as deemed necessary and appropriate. During the fall of 2003, I performed part of my internship require ment with the local and state CADRT committee in order to understand the process and scope of child death reviews. 71


Literature Review Since Kempe et al. (1960) coined the phrase battered child syndrome many research scientists have attempted to construct a theoret ical framework in which to examine the phenomenon of child abuse. The earliest theoretical framework for examining child abuse was a medical or diagnostic model. The medical model suggested that only t hose cases that could be documented through clinical testing should be labeled child abuse (Barnett et al., 1993). Other Earlier theoretical paradigms supported a psychiatric or psychological model (Steele, 1987; Ammerman, 1990 and Bucha nan, 1996) which focused primarily on the parent as caregiver as the cause of child maltreatment. Louise Armstrong (1995:25) suggests that we defuse and manage the social and/or political issues we encounter when dealing with child abus e by reformulating them as mental health problems this in turn clouds our judgment from the soci etal issues that impede preventive measures. Further, that this approac h "blinds us to the compelling social problems in which it is embedded (1995:25). Sociological models focus on so cial factors such as poverty, socioeconomic status and social isol ation (Buchanan, 1996 and Giovannoni, 1970). Charlow found that child neglect is mainly concentrated in the lower socioeconomic groups of society (2001). T he charge is to determine what role 72


poverty plays in child abuse and neglect. Margaret G. Sm ith and Rowena Fong (2004:231) suggest, children raised in pover ty are nine times more likely to be neglected than children who are not. In my work in chil d welfare, often children were removed due to poverty related neglect rather than an overt act of commission or omission on the part of the caregiver. Social learning theory (Bandura, 1977 and Daro, 1998) is predicated on the idea that children are what they learn and that in fact the social learning paradigm supports a generational transmissi on of child maltreatment behavior. Zigler and Hall (1989) suggest that this model does not acknowledge that cycles can be broken and that not all parents who were abused as a child grow up to abuse their own children. Other social scientists support an ecological approach in the research of child maltreatment (Belsky, 1980; Chaffin et al. 1996; Gaudin and Dubowitz, 1997; Djeddah et al. 2000; Garbarino and Collins, 1999; and Scannapieco et al., 2005). This model sugges ts that in order to understand the factors that influence the occurrence of child abuse; one must examine it at the individual, family, community and larger society levels. Fontes (2005:17) writes child abuse must be viewed ecosystemically, which requires an examination of a ll the systems in which children are embedded, including families, neighborhoods, peers, ethnic and religious ties as well as the broader society. Scannapieco et al. (2005:43) reminds us children neither develop nor are maltreated in a vac uum. In order to examine the issue of 73


child maltreatment, one must exami ne both the micro and macro ecological levels to provide insight to this phenomenon. Proponents of critical theory a ssert that understanding a social phenomenon necessitates examinat ion of that phenomenon in its larger political and economic context. Critical analysts of child neglect (Kasinsky, 1994; Swift, 1995) posit that society has historically conceived neglect as mothers deficient care of children. Further, that this c onceptualization of mothers deficient care serves social and political interests by averting attention from societal deficits such as problem children, cultural variat ion, poverty, and marginalization, which are costly solutions to the problem (Korbin and Spilsbury 1999). Anthropologists have remained mostly silent on the subject of child abuse definitions, as according to Korbin ( 1977) only a handful of anthropologists have investigated the subject. Conversely ther e is a substantive body of work found in the anthropological literature on the s ubject of cross-cultural childrearing strategies (Korbin, 1977) program evaluation and po licy research (Cambers, 1982). In the anthropological literature, one can find numerous references to parenting variations within cultures and among different cultures that varies significantly in their childrearing prac tices (Korbin, 1977; Garbarino and Ebata, 1981; Scheper-Hughes, 1995 and Bledsoe 1990). Consequently, anthropologists could assist greatly with the development of an operational def inition of child abuse that allows for inter national cultural variability while at the same time 74


establishing a humane standard for the treatment of children worldwide (Korbin 1977:1). While a substantial body of research on child abuse exists by other social scientists and spans over forty years of research, anthropologists have recently weighed in on the issue of child maltreatment in west ern cultures. Djeddah et al. (2000) suggest examining child abuse and neglect from a public health perspective. Further, that families need to have greater access to information on the physical, emotional and developmental needs of chil dren. Phillip Kilbride (1992) suggests in a study that the abs ence of strong kinship and extended family support systems has a correlation to increase child abuse in Kenya. Steven Pinkers article, Why they K ill Their Newborns (1998), attempts to address the issue of why mothers kill thei r newborns. Pinker acknowledges that mothers who commit neonaticide are rarely convicted, while mothers who kill older children are mostly convicted. In many European societ ies, child abuse in any form has become both a moral and legal taboo. Geoffrey R. McKee and Steven J. Shea (1998) suggest that women lack adequate resources both educational and emotional to address the de mands of parenting particularly in combination of other docu mented risk factors. McK ee and Shea (1998) found that many were victims of child abuse, limited education, and low socioeconomic status or had a family hi story of mental illness. 75


Korbin, documents a case in Lon don where a Nigerian Yoruba tribal woman was found guilty of child abuse fo r practicing a tribal tradition of scarification (1977). Korbin states that an anthropologist reviewing the case concluded that the tribal ritual of scari fication represented the woman's attempt to assert the Yoruba identity of her childr en although it was in conflict with western views of acceptable parenting. In India, where there is a parent ing preference for males, female children often receiv e less food (Miller, 1991; Miller 1984, and Minturn). Yet, in Greece, the failure of boys to live up to higher cultural expectations often lead to harsher physical abuse for boys (Agathonos, Stathacoupoulou, Adam and Nakou, 1982). In some African and South Americ an countries, mothers may resist forming attachments or provide adequate n ourishments to sickly children due to a perceived risk to maternal inve stment (Sargent, 1985 and Scheper-Hughes, 1995). Bledsoe, in reference to parenting strategies in Sierra Leone, suggests the fostering out of children and the beat ings they must endure is a means to advance children socially (1990) It is their belief that children must be fostered out to families that are more affluent in an effort to advance in society. The abuse and neglect children suffer is a way to obtain social upward mobility. The practice of allowing older sib lings to assist in the caregiving for younger children is another area under great dispute. Ko rbin (1977:14) suggests that the practice of using older siblings in the care of younger children plays a 76


significant factor in cross-cultural parenting in the study of child abuse. The debate surrounds at what age an older si bling can provide care for younger siblings. Additionally, the debate questions whether older children should provide any childrearing assistance to the fa mily under any circumstances. I have observed many instances in child welf are where children were removed only because the mother left younger children in the care of their older siblings. In these instances, the abuse was labeled inadequate supervision. Yet, there is no definitive age that case managers agree, thereby allo wing great latitude for subjectivity. Cross-cultural variation in childrearing is such that it may be impossible to arrive at a universal definition of parental abuse. However, as we become a more global community, attempts to reconcile the concept of child abuse must be tempered with a cr oss-cultural perspective. My search of the literat ure suggests that little scientific research exists on the issue of child deaths due to maltr eatment by the parent(s) or primary caregivers. In general, social sciences as a whole offer little in the way of research on child deaths due to neglect, particularly when it involves the parent(s) or caregiver as the perpetrator. The literature suggests that fatal abuse, rather than neglect, and the batteredchild syndrome have been the central research focus in todays child welfar e practice (Nelson 1986; Swift 1995). The absence of substantive research on child de aths, at least in part, is due to the absence of limited funding allocated by federal, state or local entities to understand this tragic phenomenon. Therefore, the true numbers and exact 77


nature of the problem remain virtually unknown and the troubling fact of abuse or neglect child deaths often remain a fam ilys deadly sin that is buried with the child. Many researchers and practitioner s believe child deaths due to maltreatment are generally underreported (Sanders, Colton and Roberts, 1999; Djeddah et al., 2000; Crume et al, 2002 and Herman-Giddens et al, 1999). As such, defining effective policy statements ar e further complicated by variability in data sources. In addition, Stat es definitions of key terms such as child homicide, abuse, and neglect vary, therefore, so do the numbers and types of child fatalities they report. Recent studi es in Colorado and North Carolina have estimated as many as fifty to sixty percent of child deaths resulting from abuse or neglect are not recorded (Crume et al 2002 and Herman-Giddens et al, 1999). These studies indicate that neglect is the most under-recorded form of fatal maltreatment. Smith and Fong remind us the issue of child neglect in general is overlooked in child welfare practices (2004:253). Gelles (1985:351) writes that reports of incidence, correlation, cause and effect of child abuse vary from researc her to researcher in that each has a different interpretation of what defines abuse and/or neglect. Therefore, a comparison across studies present challen ges to a scientific inquiry. Giovannoni et al. suggest that child abuse and neglect are matters of social definition and that the problems that ar e inherent in the establishm ent of those definitions 78


ultimately rest on value issues (1979:5). Fontes et al. suggest it would appear that the experience of child abuse in general, and child sexual abuse in particular, is colored by the perceptions and values of the victim, the offender, and the cultural communities in which they are nestled (2001:114). Because of these systemic problems, as well as the paucity of funding and lack of leadership to correct them, agencies that collect and monitor information on child abuse and neglect fail to develop policy and practice that address the current problems. Despite the variations, there are some common factors in most abuse cases, such as, age of parent(s), so cio-economic status, and presence of violence in the home. Additionally t he presence of substance abuse increases the chances of child abuse. Understanding which children die, focuses prevention and treatment effo rts where they will do the greatest good. Additional studies to determine the correlation between type of maltreatment and gender could provide insight surrounding soci etal experiences and expectation, particularly parenting that leads to child fatalities (Agathonos et al., 1982). Some of the most powerful factors ar e those specific to the culture and society in which a family lives. Hence, a defining and measurable objective requires that risk factors be measur ed and weighed based on their cultural importance since childrearing practices are the product of its culture. In 1999, Males represented 57% and females 43% of the child deaths reviewed in Florida as compared to 2000 where 61% were males and 39% were females. Studies to 79


determine the correlation between type of maltreatment and gender could provide insight surrounding societal experiences and expectation whereas parenting is concerned. Male children su ffer a higher rate of physical abuse, while female children suffer more abuse t hat is sexual. Current ethnographical research suggests that males higher acci dental fatalities are a result of more risky behavior (Waldron 1976b, Madrigal 1992, and Strassmann 1997). Yet, this behavior does not explain why male children suffer more physical abuse and female children more sexual abuse. Rig id gender roles can lead to expected behavior and failure to conform can have consequences (Agathonos et al., 1982). Indeed, the disparate information gather ed thus far provides no definitive answers to the most pressing question: Why do parents kill their children or become so neglectful that their children die? Investigators disagree on whether abuse and neglect represents a continuum of behaviors ranging from mild to severe, or a set of unique behavioral problem s with distinctive etiologies (Gelles, 1991). Child abuse is a significant health and social problem affecting all countries and societies (Djeddah et al ., 2000; UNICEF, 2003). Partnership and collaboration among all pr ofessionals involved in child maltreatment is decisive to alleviating the problems facing victims of child abuse. Djeddah et al. affirm that Capacity building for professions involved in child-related issues is essential for comprehensive service provision (2000:912). 80


Hypothesis Child abuse mortality data, like child maltreatment data in general, are underestimates because of variability of recording cause of deaths, definitions used, and medical personnel wi llingness and ability to recognize child abuse as the cause of death (Sander, Colton and Ro berts, 1999; Crume et al, 2002; Herman-Giddens et al, 1999 and UNICEF, 2003). Considering cross-cultural factors, defining what constitutes child abuse is an overwhelming job. Further, depending on ones interpretation, child abuse can take many different forms and circumstances. These variations in inte rpretation often lead to variability in reporting the actual number of child maltreatment deaths. I argue that mothers are the primary perpetrators of child deaths due to neglect and that males in a caretaker role are the primary perpetrators of child deaths due to physical abuse. Further, that female victim deaths are largely due to physical neglect while male victims deaths are due to blunt physical trauma. Socio-ecological models allow us to examine how economic issues influence female perpetrators and thereby provide them with the greatest opportunity for neglecting their children, while male per petrators are more prone to physical abuse. In addition to examining the role t hat poverty play as a primary factor contributing to child deaths due to maltreatment, when one combines poverty and the stress of parenting with other soci o-environmental and biological factors 81


such, age, substance abuse, mental heal th and domestic violence, children are at greater risk for death due to malt reatment (Innocenti Report Card, 2003). An examination of the cross-cultural implicatio ns of child deaths shows that while African-Americans represent a disproportion al number of child abuse reports, conversely, there is no significant statistical difference in the number of child deaths due to maltreatment between ra ces. Charlow et al. say that although a majority of families reported for child abuse are white, a disproportionate number are minority (2001). Finally, although it runs contrary to stated policy that poverty should not be used as an indicator of abuse, in most instances poverty really seems to be major factor. 82


Methodology The data were obtained from the Child Safety Assessment System (CSA), formerly FAHIS, an administrative data r epository maintained by the Department of Children and Families on all reported ch ild abuse and child fatality deaths in Florida from 1985 to 2004. While the Florida database contains information on the entire population of children who were reported for abuse or neglect as well as the children who died because of abuse or neglect, statistical analysis was conducted on those children that died between 1998 and 2000. The final study sample consisted of archival data on child deaths in the SunCoast Region, as well as the state of Fl orida from 1995 through 2004. The researcher made use of ex isting records and had no contact with human subjects. The only potential risk to human subjects was a risk that confidentiality could be breached because I had access to two identifiers, the deceased childs name and the address where the fatality occurred, These, however were not recorded so that ther e was no possibility that the searcher could reveal such confidential information. Each childs record contains a unique encrypted identifier, demographic informati on (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, and date of birth), and information regarding t he investigational process and outcome (e.g., investigation date, maltreatment indication level, maltreatment type, and 83


investigation disposition) Although prior to conducti ng a data analysis, approval was obtained from the Depar tment of Children and Familie s; however, in order to comply with academic requirements a retroactive IBR approval was obtained through the Institutional Review Board of the University of South Florida. Characteristics of the alleged per petrators such as; age, education, relationship of the child victim to ca regiver, family and household composition and the victims cause of death were examined and analyzed to determine if there is any correlation to child deaths. The quantitative data was analyzed using a SPSS statistical program. It is my be lief that the data collected support the hypothesis that gender roles play a significa nt role in child deaths and that there is no significant statistical difference in rate of child deaths based on race. The inclusion of oral histories and partici pant observation further supported the hypothesis that the cause of death and the perpetrators of child deaths due to maltreatment are gender prescribed. In addition to the historical chil d death records and data retrieved from Floridas Child Safety Assessment System, a review of Floridas abuse rates with national and international records was conducted to determine if there is a significant difference in the rate of child deaths. Additionally, participant observation was conducted with the stat e's Child Abuse Death Review Team. Further, oral histories on the evolution of ch ild protective services in Florida were obtained from both retired DCF employees and current child welfare workers, 84


with a particular emphasis on those retir ees that were around during the earlier development days of child protective services in Florida. Two data sets from t he State of Florida Depar tment of Children and Families statistical databas e on reported child deaths due to maltreatment were used in this project. One data set repr esents the cause and nu mber of deaths as assigned by the Medical Examiners office of the c ounty where the death occurred and the other reveals the relationshi p of the child victim to the alleged perpetrator for the years 1999 and 2000. Among the goal of this research is the determination of whether there is significanc e in the relationship of the victim to the caregiver. There are eight caregiver ca tegories and eighty-five child deaths in 1999 and ninety-five in 2000. Because of a small sample size, a Wilcoxson ranked-signed test for a paired design was used instead of a pa ired t-test. It was completed by manual calculation with t he use of a Wilcoxson T value table. There is no question of the sampling, because the data are t he total number of child deaths for these periods. A second data set permitted examination of the impact of policy implementation on the rate of child malt reatment deaths from 1998 to 2000. This data set consists of the rate of child maltreatment deaths fo r the calendar years 1998 and 2000. Fourteen Flori da districts as well as statewide rates were analyzed to determine if there is any co rrelation between policy implementation and child deaths in 1998 and 2000. The re searcher examined whether a change 85


in the number and cause of death is asso ciated with policy impl ementations over a two-year period. A linear scatter plot and a test for normality were performed to determine if a Pearson Correlation Analysis would be an appropriate test for this statistical analysis. 86


Results and Discussion The first data set was analyzed with a Wilcoxson signed-rank test. Table 2 below displays the results. A Wilcoxson signed-rank test was chosen due to the small sample group. The reason for the small data set is that it represents the eight caregivers relationship to the child victim categories collected. Within these eight caregiver categories, there was a to tal sample of 180 child victims for the years 1998 and 2000. A Wilcox son ranked sign test examines if there is a significant difference in child death bas ed on caregiver relationship between 1998 and 2000 child deaths. 87


Table: 2 Wilcoxson signed-rank test n = 180 OBS RELATIONSHIP TO VICTIM $ 1999 2000 Diff Absolute New Rank Final Rank 1 MOTHER 24 29 5 2 1 1.5 2 FATHER 30 11 19 2 2 1.5 3 PARAMOUR 13 11 2 3 3 3 4 PARENT/PARAMOUR 3 7 -4 -4 4 4 5 BOTH PARENTS 2 17 -15 5 5 5 6 RELATIVE 4 1 3 -7 6 6 7 SISTER 6 4 2 -15 7 7 8 UNKNOWN 3 10 -7 19 8 8 TOTAL 85 95 The ( R -) = 17, the ( R +) = 19, T = 17, n = 8, cv = 3 at alpha level 0.05. Because T is not less than or equal to the critical value of 3, it is safe to say that the analysis failed to show any parti cular relationship of the victim to the caregiver. Further, the dat a support the hypothesis that initiatives and policies implemented to affect the type of services offered to caregivers based on the relationship of the perpetrator to the ch ild victim have had little impact on the number of child deaths in that the number of child deaths increased over this period. These results suggest that policies aimed at a particular relationship of 88


the caregiver to the child victim woul d mostly likely not improve the desired outcome, which is child safety. On Dece mber 20, 1988, the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Children and Familie s issued a policy statement, which focused on the perceived risk of mothers paramour and child safety. On January 23, 1989, policies were implemented ar ound reunification efforts when mothers paramour was present in the home. While the policy might have seemed appropriate, it did not signifi cantly reduce child death. In the second test, a second data se t was examined. Fourteen Florida districts and an overall State ratio were analyzed to determine if there is any correlation between policy implementati on and child deaths for the calendar years 1998 and 2000. Table 3 is a scatter plot of the correlation between fatality rates per 100,000 children in calendar years 1998 and 2000. 89


Table: 3 Linear Regression scatter plot year1998 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 year2000 123456 7 Overall, there appear to be a positive li near regression with a few outliers. Since the data appear to have a positive linear correlation, a test of normality was performed. See table 4 for results. Table: 4 Tests for Normality Year Test Statistic----p Value-----Decision 1998 Shapiro-Wilk W 0.913651 Pr < W 0.1540 Accept 2000 Shapiro-Wilk W 0.86233 Pr < W 0.0561 Reject 90


The result suggests that the data are normally distributed. Table 5 is the result of a Pear son correlation using SASS/Assist. Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 15 Prob > |r| under H0: Rho=0 Year1998 Year2000 Year1998 1.00000 0.35896 r 0.1889 p Year2000 0.35896 1.00000 0.1889 Since both 1998 and 2000 data have a p > 0.05 with degrees of freedom equal 13, the correlation coefficient is clearly not significantly different from 0 (cv = 0.514). The degree to which the variables vary together is not statistically significant. Since 1985 and the death of Corey Greer, the Governor has appointed Task Force to examine highly publicized child deaths to determine recommendations for improvement of serv ices. Because of these various Task Forces, a number of policies have been implemented through the years to this end. These policies included reunification gu idelines, foster care placement, and 91


mandatory childcare for children under five. However, in spite of these polices the number of child deaths continued to incr ease in Florida at a higher rate than national average. Statistical data show that the primary caretaker causes most child deaths that are not accidental or natural. More often than not, the caretaker is the mother and/or father. In the 30 child deat hs in Florida for 1999, mothers were responsible for seven (24%) of the deaths, while the fa thers and male paramours (mothers significant others) were res ponsible for eleven (38%) of the 30 child deaths. According to McKay (1994), childr en are three times more likely to be abused by their fathers than by their mother s. In all the cases that fathers or paramours were responsible, the deaths we re a result of physical abuse. This contrasts with the seven deaths in wh ich mothers were responsible where neglect was the primary fa ctor in 5 out of 7. Further ethnographic work coul d lead to an understanding of the relationship of gender to child deaths. Working with families who have lost a child to abuse or neglect could offer insight on t he caretakers perception of their role in the childs death. While working with families at a time of great stress and mourning would be difficult, much could be gained in understanding the participants view. Any prevention model must take into account the targeted populations views and opinions. Too often at the time of a childs death, various professionals are engaged in the families life from various points of view. Law 92


Enforcement is looking at law violat ions, State Attorneys are looking at prosecution, and Child We lfare System Workers and others are trying to determine and prove that abuse occurred and Medical professionals and forensic personnel are trying to determine cause of death. It is at t hat this juncture that an Anthropologist would be invaluable to a ssist in the process and further aid in prevention efforts. In this data sample, of the 30 ch ildren who died of abuse and neglect, the average age of the person responsible wa s 35. This was in contrast to the national estimates which found that t he responsible persons are generally younger than 30. Depending on the age, prevention efforts would need to be targeted at the age of the caretakers. Se rvices to younger mothers and fathers must be targeted differently from an older caretaker. Further questions are what is the difference in the maltreatment based on age? One possible explanation for the difference is that in the 30 child deat hs in Florida in 1999, the children were on the average older than thos e reported in the national estimates. Hence, the older the child, the more likely the parent would be older as well. Further analysis would assist in determining the differences in these numbers. Child fatalities are arguably the most tragic c onsequence of child maltreat ment. The following table shows the national aggregate child deat h rates per 100,000 populations for the six-year period 1998 -2003 (USD HHS, 1999-2003; NCANDS, 2003). 93


Table: 6, Aggregate National Ch ild Death Data, 1998-2003 (National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and N eglect on Percentage per 100,000 Population 2003) Year National Number of Deaths Percentage per 100,000 population 1998 1000 1.62 1999 1100 1.68 2000 1200 1.71 2001 1300 1.81 2002 1400 1.98 2003 1500 2.00 Based on national data from the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect (2003), the numbers of child deaths are on a steady increase. However, theorists cannot agree on the causes of this increase. According to the National Center on Child Ab use Prevention Research ( 1998), fifty-one percent of maltreatment fatalities are from physical abuse, forty-five percent from neglect and four percent from multiple forms of maltreatment, while USDHHS (2003) estimates thirty-six percent of child deat hs are due to neglect; twenty-nine from multiple maltreatments; twenty-eight percent from physical abuse and seven percent other. Child abuse is fifteen times more likely to occur in families where 94


spousal abuse occurs. Cappelleri et al. found no significant differences in the incidence of child abuse in rural versus urban settings (1993). In 1999, Floridas rate per 100,000-child population was 2. 45 percent, which was significantly higher than the national aver age for that year. It may be important to note that comparing these rates does not take into consideration the variability in reporting and recording child fatalities (DCF Child Abuse and Neglect Deaths, 2001). Table 7, Aggregate Florida Child Death Data (Data Source is Child Fatality Reviews 1999-2002) Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities by Age, Years 1999-2002 16% 36% 25% 9% 7% 5% 2% < 1 1 2 Years 3 5 Years 6 8 Years 9 12 Years 13 15 Years 16 17 Years 95


Table 8, Aggregate National Child Death Data by Age: ( Data Source from Child Maltreatment, Child Fatalities 2002) The age of death is one of the primary factors in deciding what prevention efforts should be tried. National statisti cs report that approximately 41% of the children who died in 2002 were less than one year old and 76% were under fiveyears-old. In Florida, only 16% of t he children who died fr om abuse and neglect were under the age of one and 52% were less than three-years-old. Further research is needed to determine what ma kes the Florida experience different from National trends. One answer may lie in the variability of recording methods, data collections and interpretation. Of t he thirty child deaths in 1999 with prior verified findings, six children were two years old that repr esented the highest percentage child to die. Second highest category was at age four with 14%, followed by ages three, six and eight at 10% each. National trends show that 96


while abuse and neglect affects children of all ages, neglect rates are highest for infants and toddlers 0 3. (USDHHS, 2001) Other factors to consider are ra ce and gender. As in abuse and neglect types, statistics around race and gender vary depending on the source. Nationally, victims ranged from low 3.8 Asian/Pacific Islander victims per 1000 children to 20.7 African-American per 1,000 children of the same race in the population. The victimization rate for Am erican Indians/Alaska Natives was 19.8, for Hispanics 10.6 and for Caucasian 8.5. T hese figures represent overall child abuse and neglect and not child deaths. Of the 30 cases studied in Florida in 1999, 54% were Caucasian children and 46% were African-American. 97

PAGE 100

Table 9, Aggregate Florida Child Deat h Data by Race 1999-2003 (Data Source Florida Child Abuse Death Review, December 2004). Race of Children White Black American Indian *MultiRacial Asian Pacific Total 1999 16 14 0 0 0 30 2000 23 7 0 0 0 30 2001 17 17 1 0 0 35 2002 19 10 0 1 1 31 2003 18 15 0 0 2 35 Total 93 63 1 1 3 161 % 58% 39% 1% 1% 2% 100% Multi-Racial only includes bi-racial children because of Caucasian and African American Parentage. The 2000 census bureau data for race population in Florida provides the following: Caucasian 79.7%, African Am erican 15.5%, American Indian, 0.7%, and Asian, 2.1%. Consequently, a dispropor tionate number of African-American children are dying from abuse and neglec t, as African-Americans represent approximately 16% of the total population in Flori da, yet the aggregate data suggest that 39% of the children who di ed in Florida were African-Americans ( Wh at are the structur al and cultural 98

PAGE 101

factors that cause one group to be mo re at risk for abuse than another? What types of prevention and intervention servic es should be employed to address this difference? I believe anthropological methods c an assist in underst anding the impacts of child abuse and neglect cross-culturally. There can be little doubt that, as Lassiter (1987) says history plays a role in contributing to the parenting style of African-Americans families. Anthropologists ability to incorporate the historical perspective in their methodology could offer valuable insight on cultural differences in parenting strategies fo r African American families as opposed to families of other ethnic origins. The in ternational data suggest that countries where poverty is highest so is the degree of child maltreatment. Yet in the United States, one of the richest countries, ch ild maltreatment deaths are among the highest in the world and given that Af rican Americans are disproportionately poorer it is not surprise that Afric an Americans would rank higher among neglect deaths. Further research could aid determi ning cross-cultural implications. Research aimed at examining cross-cultural influences on parenting and the percent of child deaths due to abuse and ne glect could provide insight on various prevention methods. Florida is a multi-ra cial state, yet two groups (African American and Caucasian) r epresented the majority of child deaths reported 99

PAGE 102

between 1999 and 2003. Ethnogr aphic research to determine these differences in victim rates could offer improvement in prevention work. Table10, Aggregate Florida Child Death Data by Gender 1999-2003 (Data Source Florida Child Abuse Death Review, December 2004) Death by Gender of Children Male Female Total 1999 20 10 30 2000 18 12 30 2001 19 16 35 2002 18 13 31 2003 19 16 35 Total 94 67 161 % 58% 42% 100% There are no absolute predictors that exist to determine which children among the millions reported ar e at the highest risk of death; however, there are some standards that profe ssionals have found in families where children have suffered serious and even fatal maltreatment Current national research suggests that the children most vul nerable to serious or fatal abuse and neglect are those whose parents or other caretakers are ill equipped to care for them, who live in 100

PAGE 103

social isolation and poverty, and who ar e virtually invisible to the larger community. They tend to live in envir onments that have few supports for parents and they may not know their neighbors well enough to ask for help (Paxson and Waldfogel, 1999). Research indicates that parents or members of the imm ediate family are the primary alleged perpetrators of child deaths due to maltreatment. HermanGiddens et al. (1999) found that the biol ogical parent killed 63.5% of the child victims and that the father or stepfather was the alleged perpetrator most of the time (65.5%) and mothers paramour wa s the alleged perpetra tor 18.2% of the time. This suggests that prior policies in the State of Florida that were developed specifically to address mothers paramours in the home may have been misdirected. Although Martin Daly and Margo Wilson (1994) suggest that Stepfathers kill at a subst antial higher rate than do birth fathers, the literature and the Florida data suggest that the primary factor is males in general, not just paramours. Others have found that in neglect-related deaths and specifically the deaths of newborns, the mother is usually the perpetrator (Schlosser, 1992; Kunz and Bahr, 1996; McKee and Shea, 1998). 101

PAGE 104

Conclusion Policy implementation prior and during this two-year period has not made a significant difference in the number of child deaths from 1998 to 2000. There has been a 7% increase in overall child deaths from 1995 to 2001. During this period, several policies and/or initiati ves were developed that were geared towards preventing child abuse and neglect all with the intent of reducing deaths due to maltreatment. These initiative s have failed to produce the desired outcome. While there is no single pr ofile of a perpetrator of fa tal child abuse, certain characteristics reappear in many cases. Frequently the perpetrator is a young adult in his or her mid-20s without a high school diploma, living at or below the poverty level, suffers from some type of depression, and who may have difficulty coping with stressful situations. In many instances, the research suggests that the perpetrator has experienced violence first-hand. Fathers and other male caretakers cause most fatalities fr om physical abuse. Mothers are often responsible for deaths result ing from child neglect. However, in some cases this may be because women are most oft en responsible, or assumed to be responsible, for childrens care (Zigle r and Hall, 1989; U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect, 1995). 102

PAGE 105

During my fall 2003 internship, I observed several Child Abuse Death Review Team meetings, bot h at the local and state level. The various teams were multi-disciplinary and consisted a cadre of members, including medical examiners, health department staff, mental health c linicians, law enforcement officials, and a number of Child Welfare Service professionals. The local death review team examined the death of a se venteen-year-old male that committed suicide while in a residential facility. This child was in the cu stody of the state and had been for a significant portion of his life. He had experienced a number of losses, which included his initial remova l from his parent(s), separation from his four siblings and their subsequent adopt ion, and the reality that he was not adopted and was left to grow up in foster care. However, two key participants were omitted from the t eam. Two disciplines that could have provided much insight to the local team were educat ors and suicide prevention specialists. Particularly, since one of the child death reviewed was a male teenager that committed suicide. Every effort to assure a broad makeup with a wide range of viewpoints that are independent from any specific agency or entity must be paramount. Suicide among this age group is prevalent within the broader society. The inclusion of a suicide prevention spec ialist could add much to the discussion on current issues and trends around suicid e prevention for children in care. In 2002, there were a total of 260 reports of child deaths Of that number, 129 either were verified or had some i ndicator of abuse as the cause of child 103

PAGE 106

death. Seventy-nine child deaths were veri fied for child maltreatment. Based on Florida Statutes, the death team only reviewed those ca ses (29 of 30) where the cause of death was verified for child ma ltreatment and ther e was at least one prior abuse report with some indication or verified for abuse or neglect. One case was pending a final autopsy and was exclud ed during this death review process. The majority of the teams participants expressed concern that limiting their review to only those cases with verified findings with prior r eport restricts their ability to understand systemic causes and c ontributing factors of child deaths. Further, they contend that such a small sample size limi ts their ability to draw meaningful conclusions, although they a cknowledge that their current team construction would be ill equipped to address all child deaths within the mandated timeframe. 104

PAGE 107

Recommendation Based on participant observation, I be lieve that the death review teams findings would greatly improve child welf are workers efforts to prevent child abuse and neglect and resulting fatalities. Many new and inexperienced child welfare workers are ill informed about the risk and protective factors associated with increased child abuse or child fatality due to maltreatm ent. As a result, ongoing training to assist in adequate ri sk assessment is paramount in providing meaningful child safety. Additionally, the death review reports would be useful in educating local, state and feder al communities to the scope of child fatalities due to abuse and neglect. Further, the death review teams findings provide a useful tool to educate the public and recommend l egislation to protect children. Team findings and efforts should be integrat ed within all child and family service systems, including family support and pres ervation programs designed to assist families at highest risk. While it is clear that there are no concrete predictors, there is a point where an imbalance of risk and protective fa ctors places some children at greater risk than others. Based on prior federal and state monitoring activities of children and family services, as well as a consis tent recommendation of the death review team, risk assessments and the ability to identify emerging risk is an area in which the system has consistently fallen short. The Child Abuse Death Review 105

PAGE 108

Team has frankly warned of the need to improve training around professional and paraprofessionals ability to assess ri sk (Florida Child Abuse Death Review, 2003). Further, there should be greater coordination of service and communication across disciplines charged wit h assessing at risk families. Child abuse is like an iceberg in that most of the systemic issues resides below the surface. A collaborative effort that involves a wide array of disciplines as well as the community is required to illuminate the sociocultural, socioeconomic and sociopolitical factors that are at play in understanding child deaths due to abuse or neglect. While there are different ways to def ine a system of care to ensure child safety, there is consensus among researchers that it must involve various key stakeholders in a collaborative effort. Fu rther, that a system of care should be child centered, family focused and comm unity-based, while at the same time meet the needs of children and families in different localities and from various ethnic, cultural and economic backgrounds. Stroul et al. say that a system of care must contain a comprehensive s pectrum of mental health and other supportive services that operate as a c oordinated network desig ned to meet the multiple and changing needs of children a nd families (1986:3). Mario Hernandez and Sharon Hodges (2001) propose the i dea that new approaches to service delivery require more than a coordination of services among individual agencies. They suggest that a system of care should build a collaborative network of agencies that include mental hea lth, child welfare, education, juvenile justice and 106

PAGE 109

other appropriate child serving agencies in a systemic approach designed to meet the varying needs of children and fam ilies in a culturally competent way. Hernandez and Hodges (2001) recomm end a theory-based approach to a system of care. This ideology supports the notion of integrating the desired results into the overall organizational mission. Connell et al. (1995) advise that defining a theory of change o ften present a challenge because program planners and other stakeholders fail to examine the underlying assumptions of the services they provide. Beth Stroul et al. (1996) suggest that perhaps the greatest change in creating a system of care has been a paradigm shift concerning parents involvement. Family involvement and support is an area that much change has begun to evolve. It has become more widely accepted and acknowledged how important family strengt hs are in ameliorating risk. Recent research efforts have begun to focus on the role of parents in designing effective treatment models. Ri ngeisen et al. (1999) found that parental involvement in service design provided a number of insights on enhancing current service delivery. It is clear that many of the causes of child abuse, and in fact child deaths, center on the needs and problems of the child, parents, and community. Therefore, in order to prevent child abuse, we must first help and support the parents. Parents with multiple emotional, medica l, financial and social needs find it difficult to meet the needs of their ch ildren. Effective prevention of child abuse 107

PAGE 110

and neglect can best be achieved using st rategies designed to help parents protect and nurture their children. These strategies include giving parents the necessary support, resources and skills needed to meet the parenting demand in todays global arena. Multid isciplinary teams comprised of social workers, home health agencies, in-home visitati on programs, financial counselors, psychologists, local mental health facilit ies, alcohol and drug treatment centers and parenting centers, as appropriate, are critical in addressing this complex problem. Continued media focus and public out cry regarding the problems with the current system and an increased rate of child fatality has given way to an evolutionary approach to providing servic es to children and families involved in the child welfare system. In 1999, the Governor and the Florida Legislators enacted laws to privatize child welfare. These issues and others that are likely to arise in the future will continue to be debated as efforts to develop a more effective Child Welfare System continue to evolve. Child welfare work is intensely difficult and will always be accompanied by controversy. Legislators, Administrators and policy makers must re spond to the perceived views of the public; yet where issues ar e complex, much can be l earned from the practice wisdom of the history in the field. Effort s to align future public policy in child welfare with the knowledge and experience of professionals in the field will provide a significant contribution to the children and families served by the 108

PAGE 111

Florida Child Welfare System. Yet changes in Floridas Child Welfare System were not based on sound research efforts. The usefulness of evaluation research is manifold. Systematic evaluation research of the policies and practice s of the Department of Children and Families policies would allow a theorybased approach to establish measurable goals, objectives and outcomes. Data co llected through evaluation research are useful in policymaking and other program changes th rough the analysis of the outcome measures, as well as the cost/benefit implications. Erve Chambers put it well, Without systematic and regular procedures for evaluation, policy and decision makers would have little empirica l basis for measuring the effects of their actions (1985:161). Jill E. Korbin s uggests, In addition to delineating crosscultural definitional problems, anthropological k nowledge can be a useful component in the development of solutions to child abuse, both in Western and non-Western nations (1977, p.13). The use of ethnography would assist in understanding the cultural risk factors based on the lives of those invo lved. First, an ethnographical perspective offers an opportunity to explore the so cial, economic, political, and cultural dimension of child abuse. Secondly, an ant hropological holistic approach is well suited to facilitate a better understanding of children and families dealing with the issue of child maltreatment. Holism is a hallmark signature of anthropology and one, which gives the anthropological perspective a comparative edge. 109

PAGE 112

Ethnography could shed light on what causes some ages to be more at risk or what role gender play in chil d maltreatment. Fieldwork could offer insight into the parenting patterns of families where ch ildren are victims of abuse and neglect. Questions such as what are the sociopolit ical and sociocultural factors? What are the biological or environment al factors? While there are volumes of quantitative data on the subject of child maltreatment, a blend of quantitative and qualitative data could go a long way to aid in the area of prev ention efforts. Considering culture, hi story, politics, economics and social factors in defining what constitute child abuse is an overwhelming job, the anthropological perspective could provide the cross-cultural framework in which to understand child maltreatment. Chambers (1989) in forms that the general goal of applied anthropology is to apply anthropologi cal knowledge, methodologies, perspectives, and theories to real world problems, which is consistent with those proposed by the federal legislation of Child Abuse Death Review Teams. Further systematic research is r equired to understand the factors that influence child deaths from a variety of domains. What role do socioeconomic, ecological and biological factors play in determining which children are at greatest risk of death due to maltreatment? Additional scientific investigation could lead to more cost effective, cultur ally focused interventions and prevention services, thereby providing an empirical base on which to inform Child 110

PAGE 113

Maltreatment Prevention initiatives and polic ies at the international, national and state levels. As the media continue to alert the publ ic on the plight of abused children, the numbers of reports escalate, which in turn increases the need for more investigations and resources. In a time when the mood in society and government is becoming increasingly skeptical about child welfare agencies effectiveness nonetheless expend itures for social services are escalating. Thus, child welfare has to confront a st eadily growing problem with continuing inadequate resources. This either necessitates a need to clarify child maltreatment definitions or increase f unding to meet rising cost. Significantly reducing fatal child abuse and neglect requires the commitment and collaboration of local, state and federal ent ities in providing services to children and families. Greater commitment of resources to enhance intervention and prevention strategies are needed. Floridas current funding methodology subscribes to greater that 80% Federal funding (IVE dollars) and less than 20% State revenue (Non IVE) to support Floridas child we lfare budget. Based on the current federal funding guidelines, only children in out-ofhome placements receive the greatest federal matched funding. Hence, provid ing greater prevention services for children in-home with parents receive minimal funding. Through this thesis, I have attempted to provide a holistic insight on the domains and factors that contribute to the increase in child deaths due to 111

PAGE 114

maltreatment in spite of pas t and current policy initiatives. It is my intention to have added to the policy discussion in terms of the socio-cultural, socioeconomic, and political context su rrounding child deaths in Florida, and more specifically the SunCoast Region. Further, how these factors correlate to increased risk for child death. In an ever-gro wing global society, it is important to reflect the pedagogical differences in c onceptualization of abuse and to devise programs targeted to the different groups served. Until the research advances our knowledge, child deaths due to malt reatment will remain a familys deadly sin. 112

PAGE 115

Bibliography Aber, J. Lawrence, Joseph P. Allen, Vicki Carlson and Dante Cicchetti 1989 The e ffects of maltreatment on devel opment during early childhood: Recent studies and their theoretical, clinical, and policy implications. In D. Ci cchetti and V. Carlson (Eds.) Ch ild Maltreatment. Pp. 579-619. New York: Cambridge University Press. Agathonos, Helen, Nella Stathacoupoul ou, Helen Adam and Sheena Nokou 1982 Child abuse and neglect in Greece: Sociomedical aspects. Child Abuse and N eglect, Vol. 6(3), Pp. 307-311. Ammerman, Robert T., David J. Kolko, Levent Kirisci, Timothy C. Blackson and Michael A. Dawes 1999 Child abuse potential in pa rents with histories of substance abuse diso rder. Child Abuse and Neglec t, Vol. 23(12), Pp. 1225-1238. Ammerman, Robert T. 1990 Etiol ogical modes of child maltreat ment. Behavior Modification, Vol. 14(3), Pp. 230-254. Armstrong, Louise 1995 Of Slu ts and Bastards: A Feminist De codes the Child Welfare Debate. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press. Bandura, Albert 1977 Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Banyard, Victoria L., Linda M. Williams and Jane A. Siegel 2003 Th e impact of complex trauma and depression on parenting: An explor ation of mediating and risk and protective factors, Child Maltreatment Vol. 8, Pp. 334-349. 113

PAGE 116

Banyard, Victoria L. 1999 Childhood maltreatment and the mental health of low-income women, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Vol. 69, Pp. 161-171. Barnett, Ola W., Cindy L. M iller-Perrin and Robin D. Perrin 1997 Fa mily Violence Across the Lifespan, New York: Sage Baumrind, Diana 1994 The Soci al Context of Child Maltreatment. Family Processes and Child and Adolescent Development. Family Re lations, Vol. 43(4), Pp. 360-368. Belsky, Jay and Joan Vondra 1989 Lessons from child abuse: the deter minants of parenting. In Child Maltreatment: Theory and Research on the cause and consequences of child abuse and neglect. D. Cicchetti and V. Carlson (Eds.). Pp. 153-202. Ne w York: Worth Publishers. Belsky, Jay 1980 Child Ma ltreatment: An Ecological Int egration. American Psychologist, Vol. 35(4), Pp. 320-335. Belsky, Jay 1978 Three theoretical models of child abu se. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 2(1), Pp. 37-49. Berrick, Jill Duerr and D. M. Elliott 1997 Preventi ng child neglect: A study of an in -home program for children and families. In Jill D. Berrick, Richard P. Barth and Neil Gilbert (Eds.) Child Welfare Research Review (Pp. 63-83). New York: Columbia University Press. Berger, Kathleen S. 2001 The devel oping person through the lifespan (5 th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers 114

PAGE 117

Berger, Lawrence M. 2005 Income, family characteristics, and physical violence toward children. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 29(2), Pp. 107-133. Besinger, B., Ann F. Garland, Alan J. Litrownik and John A. Landsverk 1999 Caregiver substance abus e among maltreated children placed in out-ofhome care. Child Welfare, Ch ild Welfare League of America, Vol. 78(2), Pp. 221-239. Blau, Gary M, M. C. Whewell, Thomas P. Gullotta, and Myer Bloom 1994 The prev ention and treatment of child abus e in households of substance abusers: A Research Demonstrati on Progress Report. Child Welfare. Vol. 73(1), Pp 83-94. Bishop, Sonia J., and Bonnie J. Leadbeater 1999 Maternal social support patterns and child maltreatment: Comparison of malt reating and nonmaltreating mot hers. American Journal of Orthop sychiatry, Vol. 69, Pp. 172-181. Bledsoe, Caroline 1990 No Succe ss without Struggle: Social mo bility and hardship for Foster children in Sierra Leone, Man, Royal Anth ropological Institute. p. 71. Boney-McCoy, Sue, and David Finkelhor 1995 Psychosoc ial sequelae of violent victimizat ion in a national youth sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Vol. 63(5), Pp. 726-736. Briere, John 1989 Therapy for adults molested as children. New York: Springer Publishing. Brooks, Devon, Richard P. Barth, Alice Bussiere and Glendora Patternson 1999 Adopti on and race: Implementing the Multiethnic Placement Act and the Interethnic Adoption Provisions. Soci al Work, Vol., 44(2), Pp. 167-178. 115

PAGE 118

Brown, Jocelyn, Patricia Cohen, Je ffrey Johnson and Elizabeth M. Smailes 1999 Childhood abuse and neglect: Specificity of effects on adolescent and young adult depression and suicidality. Journal of the American Academy of Ch ild and Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 38(12), Pp. 1490-1496. Brown, Jocelyn, Patricia Cohen, Jeffrey Johnson and Suzanne Salzinger 1998 A longitudi nal analysis of risk factors for ch ild maltreatment: findings of a 17-year prospective study of official ly recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglec t. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol., 22(11), Pp. 1065-1078. Brown, Stephen E. 1984 Social class, child maltreatment, and delinquent behavior. Criminology, Vol. 22. Pp. 259-278. Buchanan, Ann 1996 Cycles of child maltreatment: Facts, falla cies and interventions. West Sussex, En gland: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Burgess, Robert L. and James Garbarino 1983 Doing What Comes Naturally: An Evolutionary Perspective on Child Abuse In The Dark Side of Families, (E ds.) David Finkelhor, Richard Gelles, Gerald Hotaling and Murray Straus. p. 90. Cambers, Erve 1989 Applied An thropology: A Practical Guide. I llinois: Waveland Press, Inc. Cappelleri Joseph C., John Eckenrode and Jane Powers 1993 The epidem iology of child abuse. Findi ngs from the Second National Incidenc e and Prevalence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect. American Journal of P ublic Health Vol. 83(11), Pp. 1622-1624. Chaffin, Mark; Kelly Kelleher and Jan Hollenberg 1996 Onset of physical abuse and neglect: Psych iatric substance abuse, and Risk fact ors from prospective community data. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 20(3), Pp. 191-203. 116

PAGE 119

Chagnon, Napoleon A. 1968 Yanomamo: The Fierce People. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Charlow, Andrea 2001 Race, poverty and neglect. William Mitche ll Law Review, Vol. 28(2), Pp. 763-790. Child Welfare League of America 2003 URL : Child Welfare League of America 1997 Child Welfare League of American Stat istic Book. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: A Nations Shame: Fatal Child Abuse and Negl ect in the United States. Child Welfare League of America 1997 Child Welf are League of American Statistic Book. Clarke, Jennifer, Michael Stein, Mindy Sobota, Margaret Marisi and Lucy Hanna 1999 Victims as victimizers: Physical aggressi on by persons with a history of chil dhood abuse. Archives of Inter nal Medicine, Vol. 159(16), Pp. 1920-1924. Connell, James P., Ann C. Kubisch, Lisbeth C. Schoor, and Carol H. Weiss 1995 New appr oach To evaluating community in itiatives: Concepts, methods, and context. Washington: DC: The Aspen Institute Costin, Lela B., Howard J. Karger and David Stoesz 1996 The Polit ics of child abuse in America. New York: Oxford University Press. Crosse, Scott B., Elyse Kaye and Alexander C. Ratnofsky 1993 A report on the maltreatment of children with disabilities. Washington, DC: Na tional Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. 117

PAGE 120

Cicchetti, Dante and Vicki Carlson 1989 Child Maltreatm ent: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect. Cicchetti and Carlson (Eds.), Ca mbridge University Press. Crume, Tessa L., Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Tim Byers, Andrew P. Sirotnak and Carol J. Garrett 2002 Underascert ainment of child maltreatment fa talities by death certificates, 1990-1998. Pediatrics, 110(2) pp. e18. URL ht tp:// /cgi/reprint/110/2/e18.pdf Daro Deborah A. and Karen McCurdy 1994 Preventing child abuse and neglect: programmatic interventions. Child Welf are Vol. 73(5), Pp 405-430. Daly, Martin and Margo I. Wilson 1994 Some Di fferential Attributes of Lethal assaults on Small Children by Stepfa thers versus Genetic Fathers. Ethology and Sociobiology, Vol. 15, Pp. 207-217. DePanfilis, Diane 1996 Social isolation of neglectful families: A review of social support assessment and inte rvention models. Child Maltreatment. Vol. 1, Pp 37-52. DePanfilis Diane and Maria Scannapieco 1994 Assessing t he safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models. Chil d Welfare Vol. 73(3), Pp. 229-45. DiLillo, David, Geor ge C. Tremblay and Lizette Peterson 2000 Mate rnal anger. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 24(6), Pp. 767-779. Djeddah, Carol, Paola Facchin; Cr istina Ranzata and Claude Romer 2000 Child abus e: Current problems and key public health challenges, Social Science and Medicine. Vol. 51(6), Pp. 905-915. 118

PAGE 121

Dubowitz, Howard 1999 Neglected Children: Research, Practice and Policy, Howard Dubowitz (Ed.), S age Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA Dubowitz, Howard and Helen King 1995 Family violence. A child-centered, family-focused approach. Pediatric Clinic of No rth American Vol. 42(1), Pp. 153-66. Dubowitz, Howard, Maureen M. Black, Raymond H. Sta rr, and Susan J. Zuravin 1993 A conc eptual definition of neglect. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 20(1), Pp. 8-26. Dubowitz, Howard 1990 Pediatrici ans' role in preventing child malt reatment. Pediatric Clinic North Amer ica Vol. 37: Pp. 989-1002. Dukewich, Tammy L., John G. Borkow ski and Thomas L. Whitman 1996 Adole scent mothers and child abuse potential: an evaluation of risk fact ors. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 20(11), Pp. 1031-1047. Duplantier, F. R. 1996 The True Histo ry of Orphanages, Americas Future URL Ellison Christopher G., John P. Ba rtkowski and Michelle L. Segal 1996 Conserva tive Protestantism and the parental use of corporal punishment. Social Forces, Vol. 74(3), Pp. 1003-1028. Family Support Network. 2002 Child abuse and neglect. Available: URL http://www.familysupo Fed Stats 2000 URL http: // 119

PAGE 122

Finkelhor, David 1990 Early and long-term effects of child sexual abuse. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol., 21(5), Pp. 325-330. Finkelhor, David, and Jill E. Korbin 1988 Child abuse as an internat ional issue. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol., 12, Pp. 3-23. Fleming Jillian., Paul E. Mullen, Beverly Sibthorpe and Gabriele Bammer 1999 The long-term impact of childhood sexual abuse in Australian women. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol., 23(2), Pp. 145-159. Fontes, Lisa A. 2005 Child A buse and Culture: Working with Diverse Families, The Guilford Press, New York Fontes, Lisa A., Mario Cruz and Joan Tabachnick 2001 Views of child sexual abuse in two cultural communities: An ex ploratory study among Afric an Americans and Latinos. Child Maltr eatment. Sage Publications, p. 114. Florida Department of Children and Families 2004 Flori da Child Abuse Death Review. Fifth Annual Report, December 2004. Garbarino, James 1998 The stre ss of being a poor child in America. Child and Adolescent Psyc hiatric Clinics of North Amer ica, Vol., 7(1), Pp. 105-119. Garbarino, James and Aaron Ebata 1981 Ethnic and cultural differences in child ma ltreatment. Paper presented at the conf erence on Research Issues in Prevention sponsored by the National Committee for the Prevention Of Child Abuse and the Johnson Fo undation, Wingspread, Racine, Wisconsin June 1981. 120

PAGE 123

Garbarino, James 1977 The Hu man Ecology of Child Maltreat ment: A Conceptual Model for Resear ch. Journal of Marriage and Family. Vol. 39(4), Pp. 721-735. Garmezy, Norman 1985 Stress-resi stant children: The search for pr otective factors. In J. E. Stevenson (Ed.), Recent research in developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology; Psychiatry Book Supplement No. 4, Pp 213-233. Pergamon: Oxford. Gaudin, James M. 1993 Effectiv e intervention with neglectful fam ilies. Criminal Justice and Behav ior. Vol. 20, Pp. 69-89. Gelles, Richard J. 1991 Physical violence, child abuse and child homicide: A continuum of violenc e or distinct behaviors? Human Nature, Vol. 2(1), Pp. 328-332. Gelles, Richard J. 1986 Family Vi olence. In R.L. Hampton, T. P. Gullotta, G. R. Adams, E. H. Potter and R. P. Weissberg (Eds.), Family Violence, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication. Gelles, Richard J. 1985 Family Violence. Annual review of So ciology, Vol. 11, Pp. 347-367. Gil, David G. 1970 Violenc e against children: Physical child abuse in the United States. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. Gillham, Bill; Gary Tanner, Bill CheyneIsobel Freeman, Martin Rooney and Allan Lambie 1998 Unemployment rates single parent density, and indices of child poverty Their rela tionships to different categories of child abuse and neglect Child Abuse Neglect, Vol. 22(2), Pp. 79-90. 121

PAGE 124

Giovannoni, Jeanne M. 1991 Social Policy considerations in defin ing psychological maltreatment. Development a nd Psychopathology, Vol. 3, Pp. 51-59. Giovannoni, Jeanne M. 1989 Definitiona l issues in child maltreatment. In Dante. Cicchetti and Vicki Carson (Eds.) Child Maltreatmen t, Pp. 3-37. Cambridge, UK: Ca mbridge University Press. Giovannoni, Jeanne M. and Rosina. Becera 1979 Defining chil d abuse. New York: Free Press. Giovannoni, Jeanne M. 1970 Child Abuse and Negl ect: Perspectives from child development knowledge, San Francisco: R & E Associates. Giovannoni, Jeanne M. and Andrew. Billingsley 1970 Child neglect among the poor: A study of parental adequacy in families of three ethnic groups. Child Welfare, Vol. 49(4), Pp. 196-204. Greenland, Cyril 1987 Prevent ing CAN Deaths: An International study of deaths due to Child abuse and neglec t, Tavistock Publication London and New York. Goddard, Chris and Bernadette J. Sanders 2001 Child Abus e and Media, Child Ab use Prevention Issues, published by the Australian Institut e of Family Studies. Vol. 14, Pp. 1-24. Goddard, Chris and Bernadette J. Sanders 1999 Why do we condone the physical assault of children by their parents and caregi vers? Australian Childhood Foundation and the Research Centre for the Prevention of Child Abuse at Monash University, Melbourne, Pp. 1-79. 122

PAGE 125

Gough, David 2005 In Child Neglect: Practice Issues for H ealth and Social Care, Eds. Julie Taylor and Brigid Daniel, Jessica Kings ley Publishers, London, P. 43. Gough, David 1996 Defining the problem Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 20(11), Pp. 993-1002. Hay, Trevor and Lesley Jones 1994 Societal interventions to prevent child abuse and neglect. Child Welfare, Vol. 73(5), Pp. 379-403. Heise, Lori L., Alanagh Raikes, Char lotte H. Watts and Anthony B. Zwi 1994 Violenc e against women: A neglected pub lic health issue in less devel oped countries. Social Science Medicine, Vol., 39(9), Pp. 1165-1179. Herman-Giddens, Marcia, Gail Brown, Sa rah Verbiest, Pamela Carlson, Elizabeth G. Hooten, Elea nor Howell and John Butts 1999 Underasce rtainment of child abuse mort ality in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Asso ciation, Vol. 282(5), Pp. 463-467. Hernandez, Mario, and Sharon Hodges 2001 Theory-Based Accountab ility. In M. Hernandez, I S. Hodges (Eds.), Developing Outcome St rategies in Children s Mental Health Pp. 21 40. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Hutchinson, Elizabeth 1997 Child Malt reatment: Can it be defined. In J ill D. Berrick, Richard P. Barth and Neil Gilbert (Eds.) Child Welfare Research Review UNICEF 2003 Innocent i Report Card, Issue 5, A League Table: Child Maltreatment De aths in Rich Nations. 123

PAGE 126

James, Allison, and Alan Prout 1997 Cons tructing and reconstructing chil dhood. London: Routledge Falmer. Karger, Howard J. and David Stoesz 1998 American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (3 rd ed.). New York: Longman Katz, Michael B. 1986 In the s hadow of the poorhouse: A social hist ory of welfare in America. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Kempe, Ruth S. and C. Henry Kempe 1978 Child Abuse. Camb ridge. Harvard University Press. P. 7. Kempe, C. Henry, Frederric N. Silverman, Brandt S. St eele, William Droegmuller, and Henry K. Silver 1962 The Battered Child Syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Associ ation, Vol. 181(11): Pp. 17-24. Kilbride, Phillip 1992 URL http://anthropology.wadswort Korbin, Jill E., Claudia Coulton, Sarah Chard, Candis Platt-Houston and Marilyn Su 1998 Impove rishment and child maltreatm ent in African American and European American nei ghborhoods. Development and Psychopathology, Vol. (10), Pp. 215-233. Korbin, Jill E. 1991 Crosscultural perspectives and res earch directions for the 21 st century. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol., 15(S1), Pp. 67-77. Korbin, Jill E. 1977 Anthropolog ical contributions to the study of child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal. Vol. 1, Pp. 7-24. 124

PAGE 127

Kunz, Jenifer and Stephen J. Bahr, 1996 A profile of parental homicide against children. Journal of Family Violence Vol. 11(4), Pp. 347-362. Lassiter, Ruby F. 1987 Child rear ing in Black families: child-abusing discipline. In R. Hampton (Ed.), Violence in the Black family. MA : Lexington Books. Pp. 39-54. Lee, Bong J. and Robert M. George 1999 Povert y, early childbearing, and child maltreatment: A multinomial Analysi s. Child and Youth Services Re view, Vol. 21(9), Pp. 755-780. Levine, Murray, Cheryl Compaan and Jennifer Freeman 1994 The Prev ention of Child Fatalities Asso ciated with Child Maltreatment. State Un iversity of New York. Buffalo. Lewit, Eugene M. 1994 Re ported child abuse and neglect. The Future of Children, Vo l. 4(2), Pp. 233-42. Liem, Joan H., Jacquelyn B. James, Joan G. OToole and Arne C. Boudewyn 1997 Assessing resilience in adults with hist ories of childhood sexual abuse, Amer ican Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Vol., 67(4), Pp. 594-606. Luthar, Suniya S. 2003 Resili ence and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversity, Cambridge University Press, New York. Madrigal, Lorena 1992 Differ ential Sex Mortality in a Rura l Nineteenth-Centur y Population: Escazu, Costa Rica. Human Biology Vol. 64( 2): 199 213. Wayne State Un iversity Press, Detroit, MI. 125

PAGE 128

MacMillan Harriet L., James H. MacMillan, David R. Offord, Lauren Griffith and Andree MacMillan 1994 A Prim ary prevention of child physical abuse and neglect: a critical review Part I. Journal Child Psyc hology and Psychiatry and allied discip lines Vol. 35(5), Pp. 835-56. MacMillan Harriet L, Jan E. Fleming, Nico Trocme, Michael H. Boyle, Maria Wong, Yvonne A. Racine, William R. Beardslee and David R. Offord 1997 Preval ence of child physical and sexual abuse in the community. Results from the Onta rio Health Supplement, Journal of American Medical A ssociation, Vol. 278(2), Pp. 131-135. Manly, Jody Todd 2005 Advances in research definitions of child maltreatment, Child Abuse and N eglect, Vol. 29, Pp. 425-439. Mannarino, Anthony and Judith A. Cohen 1995 Abuse-rela ted attributions and perceptions, general attributions and locus of contro l in sexually abused girls. Jour nal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol., 11, Pp. 162-180. Masten, Ann S. 2001 Ordinar y magic: Resilience processes in development, American Psyc hologist Vol. 56(3), Pp. 227-238. Masten, Ann S., Jon J. Hubbard, Sc ott D. Gest, Auke Tellegen, Norman Garmezy and MaryLouise Ramirez 1999 Compet ence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and mal adaptation from childhood to late adolescence, Development and Psychopat hology Vol., 11(2), Pp. 143-169. Mayhew, Henry 1861 Lon don Labour and the London Poor. New York, Dover Publications [1968] 126

PAGE 129

McGee, R. Jon and Richard L. Warms 2000 Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History (2 nd Ed) Mayfield Publis hing Company. Mountain View: CA. McKay Mary M. 1994 The link between domestic violence and child abuse: assessment and treat ment considerations. Child We lfare Vol. 73(1), Pp. 29-39. McKee, Geoffrey R. and Steven J Shea 1998 Maternal Filicide: A Cross-National Co mparison, Journa l of Clinical Psyc hology Vol. 54, Pp. 679-687. Miller, Barbara D. 1981 The Endanger ed Sex: Neglect of Female Ch ildren in Rural North India. Cornell Univ ersity Press, Ithaca, New York. Miller, Barbara D. 1984 Da ughter neglect, womens work, and marriage: Pakistan and Banglades h compared. Medical Anthropol ogy, Vol. 8, Pp. 109-126. Minturn, Leigh 1984 Changes in the differential treatment of Rajput girls in Khalapur: 195 5-1975. Medical Anthropology, Vol. 8, Pp. 127-132. Mraovick Leeann R. and Josephine F. Wilson 1999 Patterns of child abuse and neglect asso ciated with chronological age of childr en living in a Midwestern county. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 23(9), Pp. 899-903. Mrazek, Patricia J. and David A. Mrazek 1987 Resilienc e in child maltreatment victim s: A conceptual exploration. Child Abuse an d Neglect Vol. 11(3), Pp. 357-366. National Exchange Club Foundation, 2000 Abuse Publication 127

PAGE 130

National Research Council 1993 Under standing Child Abuse and Neglec t. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science. National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) 1992 URL 1992 National Center on Child Fatality Review. 2003 A How To Guide for Child Fatality Review Teams. Accessed April 2004 URL: http://www National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information 2003 Child fatalities re source listing. Accessed April 2004 from URL pubs/reslist/childfatalities.pdf National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information 2002 URL National Center on Ch ild Abuse and Neglect. 1996 Inte nsive home visitation: a random ized trial, follow-up and risk assessm ent study of Hawaii's Health y Start Program. Chicago: Center on Child Abuse Prevention Research. National Center for Health Statistics 1996 Vital stat istics of the United States. Vol. II. Mortality. Hyattsville, Md. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nelson, Barbara J. 1986 Making an issue of child abuse : Political agenda setting for social problems University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Olasky, Marvin 1996 URL Philanthropy, Culture and Societ y, published by the Capital Resear ch Center. URL http://www.americ 128

PAGE 131

Owens Pamela L. 1995 Domestic violence: impact on psychiatric medicine. The Journal of South Ca rolina Medical Association Vol. 91(10), Pp. 435-8. Paxson, Christine and Jane Waldfogel 1999 Par ental Resources and Child Abuse and Neglect. The American Economic Review. Vol. (89)2, Pp. 239-244. Pecora, Peter J., James K. Whittaker, An thony N. Maluccio and Richard. P. Barth 2000 The ch ild welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research (2 nd ed.). Ne w York: Aldine De Gruyter. Pfohl, Stephen J. 1977 The Discovery of Child Abuse, Social Problems, Vol. 23(3), Pp. 310-323. Pinker, Stephen 1996 Why They Ki ll Their Newborn, New York Times. Pitt, Stephen E and Erin M. Bale 1995 Neonaticide, infanticide, and filicide: a review of the literature. Bulletin of t he American Academy Psychiatr y Law Vol. 23(3):375-86. Public Law 104-235, Section 111: 42 U.S.C. 501g; October 1996 Public Law 96-272, 1996 licies/cblaws/capta/capta1.htm Public Law 93-247, U.S. Code title 42, chapter 67 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) 1974 URL ions/CAPTA.html (1/15/2006) Radbill, Samuel X. 1968 A history of child abuse and infanticide. In R.E. Helfer and H.C. Kempe (Eds), T he battered child (Pp. 3-17). Chic ago: University of Chicago Press. 129

PAGE 132

Reed, Robert B. 1984 Height and weight measures, in D.K. Waler and J.B. Richmond (Eds.) Monito ring Child Health in the United States, Selected Issues and Policies, Cambri dge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Ringeisen, M.S., Robert M. Friedman and G. Stearns 1999 Tam pa-Hillsborough Integrated Network for Kinds (THINK). Parent Impre ssions of the Hillsborough County Mental Health Service Delivery Sy stem for Children. Summary and Policy Recommendation. University of South Florida: Tampa. Unpublished Romans, Sarah E., Judy L. Martin, Jessi e C. Anderson, M. L. O'Shea and Paul E. Mullen, 1995 Factors that mediate between child sexual abuse and adult psychological outcome, Psycholog ical Medicine Vol. 25(1), Pp. 127-142. Rushton, F. Edward 1996 The role of health care in child abuse and neglect prevention. Journal of the South Carolina Medical A ssociation Vol. 92(3), Pp. 133-6. Sanders, Robert; Matthew Colton and Susan Roberts 1999 Child abuse fatalities an d cases of extreme concern: lessons from reviews. Child Abuse Neglect 23(3), Pp. 257-268. Sargent, Carolyn. 1984 Born to die: The fate of extraordinar y children in Bariba culture. Paper presented at the Annual M eetings of the American Anthropol ogical Association, Denver Scannapieco, Maria and Kelli Connell-Carrick 2005 Understanding Child Maltreatment: An Ecological and Developmental Perspective Oxford University Press Pp 3-244 Scheper-Hughes, Nancy 1995 Death wit hout Weeping, University of Ca lifornia, University Press. 130

PAGE 133

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy 1985 Cultur e, scarcity, and maternal thin king: Maternal detachment and infant survival in a Brazilian shantytown. Ethos, Vol. 13, Pp. 291-297. Schilling, Robert F. and Stephen P. Schinke 1984 Personal coping and social support for parents of handicapped children. Child and Youth Services Review Vol. 6 (3), Pp. 195-206. Schloesser, Patricia, John Pierpont and John Poertner 1992 Active surveillance of child abuse fatalities. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 16(1), Pp. 3-10. Sedlak, Andrea J. and Diane D. Broadhurst 1996 Third Na tional Incidence Study of Child A buse and Neglect: Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Famili es, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. National Clearinghouse on Ch ild Abuse and Neglect information. URL Sebre, Sandra, Leva Sprugevica, Antoni Novotni, Dimitar Bonevski, Vilmante Pakalniskiene, Daniela Popescu, Tatiana Turchina, William Friedrich and Owen Lewis 2004 Crosscultural comparisons of child -reported emotional and physical abu se: rates, risk factors and psychosocial symptoms. Child Abus e and Neglect, Vol. 28, Pp. 113-127. Shepard, Robert E. 1968 The abused child and the law. Washington and Lee Law review, Vol. 22, Pp. 182-195. Smallwood, Gracelyn 1995 Child abuse and neglect from an indigenous Australians perspective: Child A buse Neglect Vol. 19(3), 281-289. 131

PAGE 134

Smith, Margaret G. and Rowena Fong 2004 The Children of N eglect: When No One Cares, Brunner-Rutledge, New York. Spencer, Nick and Norma Baldwin 2005 In Child Neglect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care, Eds. Julie Taylor and Brigid Daniel, Jessica Kings ley Publishers, London, P. 23. Social Security Act of 1935 URL Steele, Brandt F 1987 Psychodynamic factors in child abuse. In R. Helfer and C. Kempe (Eds.), The battered child (4 th ed.). Pp. 81-114. Chicago, IL: Univ ersity of Chicago Press. Strassman, Beverly 1997 Polygyny as a Risk Fact or for Child Mortality among the Dogon. Current Anthr opology Vol. 38(4): 688 695. Univ ersity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. Straus, Murray A. 1974 Cultural and social organizational influ ences on violence between family me mbers. In R. Prince and D. Barried (Eds.), Conf igurations: Biological and cultural factors in sexuality and family life. Lexington, MA: Health. Straus, Murray A. 1991 Discipli ne and Deviance: Physical Punishm ent of Children and Violence and Ot her Crimes in Adulthood, So cial Problems, Vol. 38(2) Pp. 133-154. Stroul, Beth A. and Robert M. Friedman 1996 The Syst em of Care Concept and Philosophy In B. A. Stroul (Ed.), Childr ens Mental Health; Creating S ystems Of Care in a Changing Society, Pp. 3 22. Baltimore, MD: P aul H. Brookes Publishing Co. 132

PAGE 135

Sullivan, Susan 2000 Child N eglect: Current Definitions and Models A review of child neglect research, A report prepared for the Family Violence Prevention Unit, Health Canada. Swift, Karen J. 1995 'An outrage to common decency: Hist orical perspectives on child neglect', Child Welfare Child Welfare League of American, Vol. 74(1), Pp. 71-91. Taylor, Julie and Brigid Danile 2005 Child Negl ect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care (Eds.) Taylor, Julie and Brigid Daniel, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London The National Center on Child Ab use Prevention Research: Current 2000 Trends in Child Abuse Reporting and Fa talities: The Results of the 1998 Annual Fifty State Survey. Tedeschi, Richard G., Crystal L. Park, and Lawrence Calhoun 1998 Posttraumat ic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis, In: Personal ity and Clinical Psychology Series, Irving B. Weiner, (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Thomas, Mason P. 1972 Child abuse and neglect: a historical overview, legal matrix and social pers pectives. North Carolina Law Review. Vol. 50, Pp. 249-293. Tomkiewicz, Stanislaw 1998 Psychol ogical mechanism of violent behavior against children. Child A buse and Neglect, 22(10): 947-957. Trattner, Walter I. 1999 From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America. Six edi tion. New York: Free Press. 133

PAGE 136

Tyler, Rachelle, Judy Howard, Michael Espinosa and Sarah Simpson Doakes 1997 Placem ent with substance-abusing mot hers vs. placement with other re latives: Infant outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 21(4), Pp. 337-349. U.S. Department of Health and Human Se rvices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Childrens Bureau. 2004 Child maltreatment 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Department of Health and Human Se rvices, Administration for Child and Families 2001 A guide to the Mult iethnic Placement Act of 1994 as amended by the Interethnic Adoption Provisions of 1996. URL http :// U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2000 Child Ma ltreatment 1998: Reports From t he States to the National Child Abus e and Neglect Data System. U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect 1995 A nation s shame: Fatal child abuse and neglect in the United States. Washington, DC: Understanding child abuse and neglect 1993 P anel on Research on Child Abuse and Neglect, Commission on Behavio ral and Social Sciences and E ducation, National Research Co uncil. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Waldron, Ingrid 1976b Why do wo men live longer than men Part 2. Hum. Stress 2:19 30. sch ool maladaptation. New Yo rk: Human Science Press. Waldfogel, Jane 2005 Income and Child Maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect Vol. (29), Pp. 101-102. 134

PAGE 137

Wang, Ching-Tung and Deborah. Daro 1997 Current trends in child abuse reporting and fatalities: the results of the 1996 annual fifty state survey. Chicago: National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse. Watkins, Sallie A. 1990 The Mary Ellen myth: Correcting child we lfare history. Social Work, Vol. 35(6), Pp. 500-503. World Health Organization 2006 URL h ttp:// 2/05/2006 World Health Organization 1999a Report of the Consultation on Child Abuse Prevention, Geneva: WHO, Geneva, Pp. 29-31, WHO/HAC/PVI/99.1. World Health Organization 1999b The Wo rld Health Report 1999: Making a Difference. Geneva: WHO, Geneva, 1999, WA540.1 Wissow Lawrence S. 1995 Child abuse and negl ect. New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 332(21), Pp. 1425-31. Wolock, Isabel and Bernard Horowitz 1984 Child Maltreatment as a social pr oblem: The neglect of neglect. Amer ican Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 54(4), pp. 530-543. Wordsworth, William 1798 We Are Seven URL http: // Young, Leontine. 1964 Wednesdays children: A study of child neglect and abuse. New York: McGraw-Hill 135

PAGE 138

Zigler, Edward and Nancy W. Hall 1989 Physical abuse and negl ected children in America; Past, present, and future. Dante. Cicchetti and Vicki Carlson (Eds.) Child Maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and Neglect. Cambridge University Press Zuravin, Susan J. 1999 Child Neglect: A Review of Definiti ons and Measurement Research, In Negl ected in Neglected Children: Research, Practice, and Policy. Howa rd Dubowitz (Ed.) Pp. 24-47. 136

PAGE 139


PAGE 140

Appendix A: List of Acronyms Adoption and Safe Family Act AFSA Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act AACWA Aid for Dependent Children AFDC American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ASPCA Child Abuse Prevention and Tr eatment Act CAPTA Child Abuse Death Review Teams CADRT Child and Family Service Reviews CFSR Child Abuse Death Review Team CADRT Department of Children and Families DCF International Society for the Preventi on of Child Abuse and Neglect ISPCAN National Center on Child Abus e and Neglect. NCCAN National Center on Child Abus e Prevention NCCAPR National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System NCANDS Non-Governmental Organization NGO Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD Social Security Act SSA The World Health Organization WHO The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ASPCA United Nation International Child rens Emergency Fund UNICEF United States Department of Health and Human Services USDHHS 138

xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam Ka
controlfield tag 001 001914435
003 fts
005 20071024094233.0
006 m||||e|||d||||||||
007 cr mnu|||uuuuu
008 071024s2006 flu sbm 000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E14-SFE0001756
GN397.5 (ONLINE)
1 100
Williams, Christa A.
2 245
A family's deadly sin :
b fatal child abuse in Florida, an anthropological perspective on child deaths due to abuse and neglect
h [electronic resource] /
by Christa A. Williams.
[Tampa, Fla] :
University of South Florida,
3 520
ABSTRACT: This thesis examines child death data in an effort to assist in prevention and intervention, as well as, to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis to improve and enhance policy development around child deaths due to abuse and neglect in florida. The data reviewed consisted of aggregate data for all incidents of child deaths (N = 266) in Florida where the primary caregiver was the alleged perpetrator of a child fatality for children under age 18. All data examined were recorded and stored in the Department of Children and Families' Child Safety Assessment database between 1998 and 2000. According to national and state data on maltreatment deaths, the number of physical abuse deaths are slightly higher than fatalities categorized as due to neglect (51% and 43%, respectively), and the remaining 6% are attributed to both abuse and neglect. The data suggest that mothers account for the greatest percentage of child deaths due to neglect, while fathers and other male careg ivers are responsible for the greatest percentage of child fatalities due to physical abuse. There was no significant difference between child fatalities committed by biological fathers as opposed to other male caregivers, which suggests that policies around caregiver relationship has had limited impact on child safety. Describing and defining different kinds of maltreatment requires that attention be paid to historical and cultural environments. Policies for preventing or reducing child deaths requires understanding of risk factors and protective factors at the level of the individual, the family, the community, and the society. Whereas men and women differ in types of maltreatment they are likely to commit, the difference in rate of child fatalities committed by biological fathers as opposed to other male caregivers is insignificant. These findings suggest that policies that focus on caregiver relationship have limited impact on child safety. Anthropological holistic insight on the d omains and factors that contribute to the increase in child deaths due to maltreatment may help to develop new policy initiatives. Until research advances our knowledge and that knowledge is used to set policies, and those polices properly implemented, children will continue to fall victim to maltreatment fatalities.
Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Florida, 2006.
Includes bibliographical references.
Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Title from PDF of title page.
Document formatted into pages; contains 138 pages.
Child maltreatment.
Family violence.
Parental motivation.
t USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
4 0 856