xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam Ka
controlfield tag 001 002000899
007 cr mnu|||uuuuu
008 090423s2008 flu s 000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E14-SFE0002512
Melko, Jennifer A.
Identity, desire and spectatorship :
b an examination of Germaine Dulac's La coquille et le clergyman
h [electronic resource] /
by Jennifer A. Melko.
[Tampa, Fla] :
University of South Florida,
Title from PDF of title page.
Document formatted into pages; contains 57 pages.
Thesis (M.L.A.)--University of South Florida, 2008.
Includes bibliographical references.
Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.
ABSTRACT: Germaine Dulac's 1928 avant-garde film, La Coquille et le Clergyman, based on a script written by Antonin Artaud, presents the idea of the woman as an object of desire, subjected to the male gaze through the cinematic process. Not only is the lone female character the object of desire of her two male suitors on screen, but she also becomes the object of desire for the presumably male viewer of the film, who has become a silent character in the film. Rather than simply being the spectator, the viewer's own identity becomes entwined with that of the on screen characters. While the idea of the woman as the object of desire subjected to the often male gaze in the cinema has been analyzed by many feminist film theorists, including Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman and Mary Ann Doane, the theories presented center on films directed either by male directors or female directors since the 1970's. Very little has been written about films directed by women in the 1920's, including La Coquille et le Clergyman. By examining Coquille et le Clergyman, I hope to fill in a gap in the discourse of the majority of feminist film theory. This thesis will not only attempt to understand how Germaine Dulac, an early feminist film director, approaches the idea of the female body as an object of desire subjected to the male gaze differently than her male film director counterparts, but will examine how the relationships between the female character and the two male characters differ from other male directed avant-garde films from the 1920's and how these relationships affect spectatorship. By examining La Coquille et le Clergyman, I hope to better understand how Dulac's cinematic interpretation of Artaud's script treats the idea of spectatorship, not only in 1928, but also today.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
Advisor: Silvio Gaggi, Ph D.
t USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Identity, Desire and Spectators hip: An Examination of Germaine DulacÂ’s La Coquille et le Clergyman by Jennifer A. Melko A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Humanities and American Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Silvio Gaggi, Ph.D. Maria Cizmic, Ph.D Margit Grieb, Ph.D Date of Approval: July 11, 2008 Keywords: feminism, avant-garde, gaze, psyc hoanalysis, film theory, Antonin Artaud Copyright 2008 Jennifer A. Melko
Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like expre ss my sincere gratitude to my thesis committee members, Dr. Silvio Gaggi, Dr. Mari a Cizmic and Dr. Margit Grieb, for all the helpful insight. Without them, this project w ould not have been possibl e. I would also like to thank all the professors and staff members in the Humanities/American Studies Department, especially those I have had the pleasure of working with: Dr. Gaggi, Dr. Cizmic and Dr. Belgrad, of course, Dr. Anne tte Cozzi for trying to keep me on track, Dr. Niki Kantzios for all her support and expe rtise and Dr. Timothy Smith, for his neverending patience and encouragement, as well as th e inspiration for future projects. A very special thank you goes to my wonderful office mates, especially th e other two Â“graces,Â” as well as all the graduate students and adj uncts I have become close friends with. Finally, I would like to thank my parents for al l their love and support over the years, my best friend Kristen for keeping me laughing and for being my Â“sister,Â” and my husband Barton for everything.
Table of Contents AbstractÂ…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…ii IntroductionÂ…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â….1 Chapter One: The Varied Visions of Germaine Dulac and Antonin ArtaudÂ…Â…Â…Â…....11 Chapter Two: Interpretation of a Dream: Germaine Dulac and the Avant-GardeÂ…Â…...23 Chapter Three: Objects, Symbolism and Metaphor in La Coquille et le Clergyman Â…...33 Chapter Four: Spectatorship and the Gaze in La Coquille et le Clergyman Â…..Â…Â…Â…..41 ConclusionÂ…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â….50 BibliographyÂ…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…Â…...Â…Â….. 53
ii Identity, Desire and Spectatorsh ip: An Examination of Germaine DulacÂ’s La Coquille et le Clergyman Jennifer A. Melko ABSTRACT Germaine DulacÂ’s 1928 avant-garde film, La Coquille et le Clergyman based on a script written by Antonin Artaud, presents th e idea of the woman as an object of desire, subjected to the male gaze through the cinematic process. Not only is the lone female character the object of desire of her two male suitors on scre en, but she also becomes the object of desire for the presumably male vi ewer of the film, who has become a silent character in the film. Rather than simply being the spectator, the viewerÂ’s own identity becomes entwined with that of the on screen characters. While the idea of the woman as the object of desire subjected to the often male gaze in the cinema has been analyzed by ma ny feminist film theorists, including Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman and Mary Ann Doane, the theories presented center on films directed either by male directors or female directors since the 1970Â’s. Very little has been written about films directed by women in the 1920Â’s, including La Coquille et le Clergyman By examining Coquille et le Clergyman I hope to fill in a gap in the discourse of the majority of feminist film theory. This thesis will not only attempt to understand how Germaine Dulac, an early feminist film director, appro aches the idea of the female body as an object of desire subjected to the male gaze differently than her male film director counterparts, but will
iii examine how the relationships between the fema le character and the two male characters differ from other male directed avantgarde films from the 1920Â’s and how these relationships affect spect atorship. By examining La Coquille et le Clergyman I hope to better understand how DulacÂ’s cinematic interpre tation of ArtaudÂ’s scri pt treats the idea of spectatorship, not only in 1928, but also today.
1 Introduction During the 1920Â’s in France, avant-gard e cinema blossomed and many notable writers, including Charles Baudelaire, Robert Dresnos and Antonin Artaud, saw their works translated into the film medium. During this time, only a handful of female directors worked in the film industryÂ—most notably, Alice Guy-Blanche, Lois Weber, Maya Deren, Marie Epstein and Germaine Dulac. Of these directors, Germaine Dulac is perhaps the most interesting, not only because of her success as a filmmaker, but also because of the controversy surrounding one of her films, La Coquille et le Clergyman. When looking at the works of Dulac, it is important to observe how she used the cinematic process to create a visually stimul ating work of art and to examine whether or not her approaches to the cinema differ from those of her male counterparts. Through this examination, several questions arise. Do es Dulac incorporate a feminine perspective in her films which creates a difference in how they are viewed? Would the viewer recognize DulacÂ’s films as being Â“feminineÂ” or Â“masculineÂ”? Finally, in regards to La Coquille et le Clergyman did Dulac break completely away from the aesthetic created by Antonin Artaud, the filmÂ’s screenwriter? Charlotte-Elisabeth-Germaine Saisse t-Schneider was born in 1882 in Amiens, France. Her father, a career military officer, sent Germaine to live with her grandmother in Paris, where she was exposed to art, theater and music. DulacÂ’s 1905 marriage to Louis Dulac, coupled with their bourgeois status, allowed Dulac the independence and
2 financial support to pursue her cinematic endeavors. DulacÂ’s interest in the cinema came from her work as a drama critic for La Franaise a feminist magazine, as well as a trip she took to Italy with friend and actress, Stacia de Napierkowska. After making a number of small films, Dulac re leased her first successful film, La Souriante Mme Beudet ( The Smiling Madame Beudet ) in 1923. La Souriante Mme Beudet adapted from an avant-garde play, depicts the fantasy life of a woman trapped in an unsatisfying marri age. In the film, Dulac deviates from the conventions of many of her male contempor aries. According to William Van Wert, La Souriante Madame Beudet Â“is one of the few experimental films of the decade in which women are not fragmented, shown as sexual freaks, stripped in close ups or through editing to reveal a bleeding m outh, bared breasts, or buttocks.Â”1 Films such as Man RayÂ’s LÂ’Etoile de Mer where the female strips naked for the male character, and EmakBakia where the shadows of a window bli nd fragment the womanÂ’s body, as well as Salvador Dali and Luis BuuelÂ’s Un Chien Andalou, where the womanÂ’s eye is cut out, all present the female character as the object of desire which must be suppressed in some way. In contrast, Dulac presents Mme Be udet as the protagonist and focuses on the womanÂ’s inner desires through the Â“sustained exploration of (her) inner life (and her) subjective experience.Â”2 Through various fantasy sequences, Mme Beudet becomes the one who desires the sexual object, the male tennis player who represents some missing part of her relationship with her husband. She is never seen as the cause of anxiety, fear or disgust for the male subject. Instead, it is the male charact er, Mme BeudetÂ’s husband, 1 William Van Wert Â“Germaine Dulac: First Feminist Filmmaker,Â” Women and the Cinema: A Critical Anthology Ed. Karyn Kay and Gerald Peary (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1977) 214. 2 Richard Abel, French Cinema: The First Wave 1915-1929 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984) 341.
3 who causes the fear and anxiety for both Mme Beudet and the filmÂ’s viewer, due to DulacÂ’s cinematic techniques. According to Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, Â“D ulacÂ’s often anti-illusionist cinematic techniques were perfectly adapted to this inne r portrayal of the inne r life of a severely frustrated woman.Â”3 Through point-of view shots from Mme BeudetÂ’s perspective, softly focused images and slow motion actions, Du lac draws the viewer into Mme BeudetÂ’s world. If Dulac created the film using traditional cinematic aestheticsÂ—camera positions which create distance between the viewer and the on-screen characters continuity editing and limited point of view shotsÂ—the viewer woul d be left with only an illusion of reality from an outsiderÂ’s perspectiv e. The viewer might understa nd Mme BeudetÂ’s unhappiness, based on facial expressions and her demeanor towards her husband, but he or she could only make assumptions about the extent of Mme BeudetÂ’s unhappiness. By moving away from the more traditional techniques, wh ich merely present an illusion of a possible reality, Dulac constructs a more explicit real ity in which the viewer becomes Mme Beudet. By cinematically illustrating Â“the characterÂ’s perceptions and imaginings, the spectator is (not only) made to identify a nd empathize with a sensitive, remorseful womanÂ”4 but is also allowed to explore and e xperience her psychol ogical struggles and the loneliness and solitude of her fantasy world. DulacÂ’s La Coquille et le Clergyman a film based on a script written by Antonin Artaud, presents the psychological struggles of the protagonist differently. According to William Van Wert, Â“the clear distinction be tween objective reality and subjective pointof-view shots that exists in ( La Souriante Mme Beudet ) no longer exists in ( La Coquille 3Sandy Flitterman-Lewis qtd. in E. Ann Kaplan, Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera (New York: Methuen, Inc, 1983) 88. 4 Abel 341.
4 et le Clergyman ).Â”5 Instead of focusing on the inner struggles and fantasies of a female character, Dulac depicts the progressive insa nity of the filmÂ’s primary character, the clergyman. While the viewer witnesses this progression, he or she never quite becomes aware of the clergymanÂ’s inner-most thoughts. The viewer can only speculate on what the clergyman is thinking as he sl owly loses his grip on reality. In La Coquille et le Clergyman the clergyman pursues a beautiful woman and, at first glance, one might believe the woman is the force which driv es the clergyman insane. However, upon further examination, one realizes DulacÂ’s po rtrayal of the woman takes her beyond being merely a sexual object. Like the male tennis player from La Souriante Mme Beudet the woman in La Coquille et le Clergyman appears to be a representation of some missing part of the clergymanÂ’s identity. By appl ying the psychoanalytic theories of Jacques Lacan and his idea of the Â“mirror stage,Â” it is likely that the woman, at least in a portion of the film, represents the part of the clergymanÂ’s identity lo st in his separation from the mother and his insanity is the result of his attempt to reconcile what is missing with his own identity. In addition to Lacanian psyc hoanalytic theories, FreudÂ’s concept of the Oedipal complex also applies to the film. The three charactersÂ—the clergyman, the woman, and an officer/priestÂ—set up an oedipal scenario, where the clergyman must kill the father figure (the officer/priest) in order to gain the affections of the motherly figure (the woman). Van Wert asserts that Dulac, in La Coquille et le Clergyman, Â“exploits the Freudian symbolism of her male colleagues. Sh e makes a film in thei r style in order, at the end, to expose male fantasies.Â”6 While she interprets aspects of the script with a feminist viewpoint, illustrating male desires towards women, the idea of exploitation is 5 Van Wert 218. 6 Van Wert 218.
5 not as concrete as it might seem. Dulac did follow ArtaudÂ’s script as much as possible; so much of the Freudian symbolism would inherently be present as ArtaudÂ’s vision instead of DulacÂ’s exploitati on. In addition, defining DulacÂ’ s cinematic style in relation to her male colleagues becomes problematic. DulacÂ’s work tends to lean towards the more formalist aspects of the avant-garde. She creates films with a sens e of visual harmony through the use of lighting, editing and other formal elements, while still portrayi ng the inner struggles of the characters. However, since Dulac closely followed ArtaudÂ’s script for La Coquille et le Clergyman she is often considered one of the earliest surrealist filmma kers. According to Michael Gould, in his book Surrealism and the Cinema Â“Surrealism concerns itself with a desire for the image or object (Â…). The surrealist fe els he must become ac tively involved in the existences of these objects and seeks to form a whole with them. This search becomes so intense that he finds himsel f catering to a new hunger, and suffers from a want of fulfillment.Â”7 This is certainly the case in La Coquille et le Clergyman where the clergyman becomes absorbed with his object of desire, the beautiful woman. However, the assertion that Dulac was solely a surre alist filmmaker fails to take into account several issues; the most importa nt being the fact that Dulac was a female filmmaker and writer who never closely associated with a ny of the members of the Surrealist group. DulacÂ’s interpretation also moves the film aw ay from the harsh juxtapositions, violent actions and fetishized portrayal of the woma n often utilized by surrealist filmmakers, such as Man Ray, Salvador Dali and Luis Buuel. DulacÂ’s style, according to Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, belongs more to nineteenth century symbolism than twentieth century 7 Michael Gould, Surrealism and the Cinema: (open-eyed screening) (Cranbury: A. S. Barnes and Co., Inc., 1976) 21-2.
6 surrealism, due to its reliance on the Â“fluidity of images, a so rt of expressive euphoria and a quasi-musical harmony.Â” 8 Dulac felt strongly about creating an aesthetically pleasing, Â“artisticÂ” film which could be followed to some degree by the audience. In this respect, she breaks away from the Su rrealist filmmakers, who, like Artaud, used the cinema to Â“search for dissociation, fracture, (and) r upture, and (whose) vi olent discourse would proscribe all harmony.Â”9 Alan Williams notes that the filmÂ’s Â“reality in front of the camera, the material world of the fiction is never allowed to seem strange in and of itself: a sense of the surreal is imposed, not found.Â”10 Since Dulac did recreate Ar taudÂ’s script as accurately as possible, some aspects of La Coquille et le Clergyman could be interpreted as surrealistic, based on ArtaudÂ’ s own surrealist ideological backgroundÂ—the concept of the woman as an object of desire, the mockery of the clergy, the primal urges of man. However, DulacÂ’s interpretation of La Coquille et le Clergyman does vary in some respects when compared to the script, especia lly in the parts of the script where ArtaudÂ’s description are vague. She tends to move away from the comp lete lack of narration, the harsh juxtapositions, shocking imagery and violence of the script in favor of a loosely based narrative without the violence or shocking imager y often used by her male counterparts. In fact, the most violent act in the film, the splitting of the officer/priestÂ’s head is hardly violent at all. Instead of focusing on the violence of the scene, DulacÂ’s interest is in the visual r hythm created as the head sp lits with precise timing. 8 Sandy-Flitterman-Lewis qtd. in Alain and Odette Virmaux, Artaud/Dulac La Coquille et Le Clergyman: Essai DÂ’lucidation DÂ’une Querelle Mythique trans. Tami Williams (Paris: ditions Paris Exprimental, 1999) 111. 9 Flitterman-Lewis qtd in Virmaux 111. 10 Williams 148.
7 It is also important to examine how DulacÂ’s cinematic techniques affect the spectatorship of the film. The interest in spectatorship is not a new one. Throughout history, works of art have engaged the pa rticipation of the viewer. TitianÂ’s Venus of Urbino and IngresÂ’s Grande Odalisque all draw the viewer in to the scene through the female subjectsÂ’ exotic star es out of the picture frame. In the works of Titian and Ingres, the woman becomes the eroticized object of desire for the viewer and the representation of true beauty. In TitianÂ’s work, for inst ance, a woman lies seductively on a sofa as she stares intently out towards the viewer. He r engagement is with the viewer; her bared breasts and suggestive placement of her hand ov er her genital area objectifies her and attracts the attention a nd desires of the viewer In IngresÂ’ work, Grande Odalisque, the woman is not as displayed as TitianÂ’s Venus Instead of having her femininity displayed for all to see, her back faces the viewer. Sh e turns her head to look behind her, evoking a similar sense of desire in the viewer. In thes e paintings, it could be said that the male viewer desires the woman sexually, while the fe male viewer desires to be the woman, in order to be desired by the male. In comparison, ManetÂ’s Olympia differs from Venus of Urbino and Grande Odalisque. While to some male viewers, the woman in Olympia may represent some sexual desire, sh e appears to be more of a re presentation of what is not desireable. Geometric lines replace the soft curves of the womanÂ’s body. The harsh, blown out lighting of the womanÂ’s body agai nst a darkened bac kground becomes jarring. The awkwardness of the womanÂ’s body and her uninviting stare dist ances the viewer from her. What makes the viewing of these paintings different from the viewing of a female character in a film? In the paintings, we see only one moment in time which the painter
8 represents for the viewer. We have little cont extual information, othe r than the details of the painting, by which to make a judgment of the woman. The cinema, however, draws the viewer into the actions of the characters, often making the viewer a silent character. Through point-of-view shots, camera angles a nd other cinematic tech niques, the viewer often takes on the perspective of the on-scre en characters. DulacÂ’s films, such as La Souriante Mme Beudet and La Coquille et le Clergyman, allow the viewer to experience the fantasies and insanity of the characters fr om their perspectives instead of distancing the viewer into the positi on of a silent observer. Film theories from the 1970Â’s through t oday have provided various perspectives by which the different types of spectatorship an d issues of the gaze can be examined. In 1975, Laura Mulvey, in her article Â“Visual Plea sure and Narrative Cinema,Â” incorporated Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theori es to examine the male spectatorship of any given film. MulveyÂ’s premise of the Â“w oman as image, man as bearer of the lookÂ”11 asserts that the predominantly male viewer l ooks upon the male characters in the film as a reflection of a Â“superiorÂ”12 self. The female character is then reduced to being an object of desire, through Â“which man can live out his fantasies a nd obsessions through linguistic command by imposing them on the silent im age of woman still tied to her place as bearer, not maker, of meaning.Â”13 In her analysis, Mulvey co nsiders the spectatorship of a film to be a form of scopophilia, where enjoyment comes from watching. Scopophilia, according to Mulvey, is divided into two fo rms. The first form makes the woman a fetishized object of male desire while the sec ond form allows the viewer to identify with 11 Laura Mulvey, Â“Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends 3rd ed., ed. David H. Richter (Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007) 1175. 12 Mulvey 1175. 13 Mulvey 1173.
9 on screen characters. While MulveyÂ’s theori es provide an important basis for analyzing the portrayal of the woman in the cinema, they only present one aspect of the treatment of the female in the cinema and she only takes in to consideration the perspective of the male viewer and the desires the male viewer has for the on-screen female character. Subsequent theorists, incl uding Mary Ann Doane, Teresa De Lauretis and Kaja Silverman, have re-examined the ideas of sp ectatorship to include the female viewer. In the case of Germaine Dulac, several things become important when looking at various ideas of spectatorshi p. Prior to the creation of La Coquille et le Clergyman Germaine Dulac had already instilled mu ch of her feminine perspective in La Souriante Mme Beudet. DulacÂ’s Â“experimentation with cinema tic language and its constructions of the spectator, exploration of the structures of unconscious fantasy, and research into the possibilities for represen ting (female) desireÂ”14 change how her films are viewed in comparison to the films created by her male counterparts. In La Souriante Mme Beudet, Dulac manipulates the relationship between the on-screen characters and the viewer through the depictions of Madame BeudetÂ’s fa ntasies, allowing for the both the female and male viewer to identify with the female character. Instead of making the woman the object of desire, Dulac creates a scenario wh ere the male tennis player in Mme BeudetÂ’s fantasies becomes the sexualized object of desi re. The viewer never identifies with the male character, Mme BeudetÂ’s husband. Instead the viewer identifies with Mme Beudet due to the numerous superimpositions and point of view shots from her perspective. DulacÂ’s approach to La Coquille et le Clergyman differs slightly from the that of La Souriante Mme Beudet Her close adaptation of Ar taudÂ’s script leaves more 14 Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, To Desire Differently: Feminism and the French Cinema (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996) 35.
10 ambiguity in the examination of how the film is seen based on the spectatorÂ’s gender. By remaining true to what Artaud envisioned, Dula c inherently incorporates the idea of the woman as an object of desire for the male ch aracter as well as the viewer. Yet DulacÂ’s interpretation of the woman is mild comp ared to ArtaudÂ’s, and she focuses on the clergymanÂ’s attempt at unders tanding his insanity instead of the womanÂ’s sexuality. DulacÂ’s woman never flaunts her sexuali ty or provokes the clergyman by making innuendos towards him. Her mere presence drives him insane. Whether her work embraces the more formalistic aspects of the avant-garde or takes on a more surrealist aesthetic, Germai ne Dulac incorporates her own aesthetic sensibilities into each of her films. It is interesting to examine DulacÂ’s films in a contemporary context, especia lly through the analysis of contemporary feminist film theorists, and observe how Dulac addresse s her own feminist viewpoints in a male dominated industry. Her female characters are not simply objects of desire. They become individuals with whom the viewer can relate to and empathize with. DulacÂ’s films allow the female viewer a sense of par ticipation seldom seen in films created by her contemporaries. Throughout her career as a filmmaker, she embraced the cinematic process as a way to create a sense of visu al harmony and proved that women could create thought provoking and aesthetic ally pleasing films.
11 Chapter One The Varied Visions of Germai ne Dulac and Antonin Artaud On the evening of February 9, 1928, Germaine DulacÂ’s film La Coquille et le Clergyman based on a script originally writte n by Antonin Artaud, a noted Surrealist artist and author, premiered at the Ursulines. Dulac, duri ng the premiere of the film, faced severe criticism from the members of the audience, many of whom belonged to the Surrealist movement. They accused Dulac of feminizing ArtaudÂ’s script and nearly started a riot on the filmÂ’s opening night. Over the last eighty years, the events of that night have been greatly debate d. Early accounts claim Artaud instigated the attack with the assistance of his Surrealist friends. This is perhaps the most controversial assumption, given that Artaud, by many accounts, was not on the best terms with the Surrealist group. Other accounts claim Artaud was at the scr eening with his mother and sat quietly while other members of the audien ce yelled insults at Dulac. While Artaud disapproved of some of th e decisions Dulac made and presumably thought he should have a greater role in the filmÂ’s creation than he actually did, most accounts now agree he was not one of the vocal critics during opening night, although he probably secretly enjoyed the premiereÂ’s spectacle. In an interview conducted by Alain and Odette Virmaux, ArtaudÂ’s friend and co mpanion at the time, Alexa ndra Pecker describes Artaud as being Â“restless, garrulous, but quite cheerfulÂ”15 after the event. 15 Virmaux 94.
12 Regardless of ArtaudÂ’s response at the pr emiere, it seems the Surrealists were merely interested in starting a scandal for th e mere pleasure of creating public insult. If anyone other than a member of the group had directed La Coquille et le Clergyman the events of the premiere might have occurred in a similar fashion, es pecially since anyone who did not appeal to the Surrealists left th emselves open to severe criticism. Shortly after the La Coquille et le Clergyman incident, another film, Luis Buuel and Salvador DaliÂ’s Un Chien Andalou nearly evoked a similar riot, simply because Buuel and Dali were relatively unknown at the time and th eir film would certainly Â“be a shameful usurpation.Â”16 A private screening for Andre Breton of Un Chien Andalou saved the film from a fate similar to La Coquille et le Clergyman After the viewing, BretonÂ’s excitement about the film eliminated any chan ce for controversy at its premiere. Since Dulac was never truly part of the Surrealist i nner circle and did not have the endorsement from members of the group, her interpretation of the film provided the Surrealists an obvious excuse to cause controversy. Despite the controversy surrounding the film, Dulac did attempt to follow ArtaudÂ’s script and only deviated from it in order to Â“enable the explicit representation of often semi-abstract images.Â”17 Many of the changes appear to be based solely on DulacÂ’s interpretation of ArtaudÂ’s script. For instan ce, the end of the opening scene is described as follows: But then the officer is behind the back of the man dressed in black. He takes the oyster shel l out of his hands. Plainly su rprised, the man lets him. The officer circles the room several tim es with the shell, then all of a 16 Virmaux 92. 17 Stephen Barber, Artaud: The Screaming Body (Creation Books, 1999) 12.
13 sudden draws his sword from its scabba rd and smashes the shell a gigantic blow. The whole room trembles.18 While the actions are presented almost as they are described in the script, minor differences change the interpretation. Wh en the officer removes the shell from the clergyman, the clergyman cringes in fear, rather than surprise, as he leans away from the officer. As the officer circles the room, Dulac includes several jump cuts to the clergymanÂ’s face, which retains its fearfu l expression. Throughout the film, this expression of fear, not surprise, is seen on the clergymanÂ’s face whenever he sees the officer. Another deviation of the script a ppears after the officer smashes the shell. ArtaudÂ’s script calls for an immediate cut to the clergyman crawling on the streets, while DulacÂ’s interpretation has the clergyman sinki ng to all fours in the room and crawling after the officer. This creates a narrative structure often used by Dulac to offset the harshness Artaud had envisioned. Fo r Dulac, the ability to keep the viewer engaged by creating a sense of visual harmony was just as important as the formal elements and techniques used in a film. By extending Ar taudÂ’s script and crea ting a loose narrative where the officer bullies the clergyman into giving up his shell and the clergyman must, at least in his own fantasy world, exact some so rt of revenge on the man, Dulac is able to draw the viewer in rather th an alienate him or her. DulacÂ’s feminist viewpoints also come through when comparing the film with the original script. In the ba llroom scene, ArtaudÂ’s screenplay describes the following: Couples enter, some mysteriously on tip-toe, others extremely busy. The chandeliers follow the movements of the couples. All the women are 18 Antonin Artaud, Victor Corti, Simone Sanzenbach, Â“Scenarios and Arguments,Â” The Tulane Drama Review 11.1 (Autumn 1966): 174. JSTOR University of South Florida, Tampa Lib. 07 July 2008
14 wearing short dresses, short hair, fl aunt their legs and stick out their busts.19 In DulacÂ’s interpretation, the focus is hardly on the women at all. Instead of fragmenting the women by focusing on the length of their dre sses, their hairstyles, their legs or their busts, Dulac simply shows a scene with coupl es dancing. The dresses of the women in the film are only modestly short, falling at th e mid-calf, and the dress length is only seen in the shots where the camera is placed near th e floor to show the legs of the dancers. The women are never seen Â“flaun tingÂ” their legs. Instead, Du lacÂ’s shows the legs of both the women and the men dancing to give a visu al image of the musicÂ’s rhythm. None of the women Â“stick out their busts.Â” As a co mpromise, Dulac depicts one couple where a manÂ’s head is bowed down as he stares at hi s partnerÂ’s breasts. Instead of just making the woman the object of desire, Dulac makes a commentary about the male singleminded focus on the sexuality of women. In a later scene, the clergyman is seen on a boat where the officer, from earlier in the film, is chained to the deck. According to ArtaudÂ’s script, The clergyman is now in a shipÂ’s cabi n. He gets out of his bunk, steps out on deck. The officer is there, weighed down with chains. Then the clergyman seems to retire within himself and pray, but when he raises his head, level with his eyes are two mouths which merge, disclosing a woman beside the officer who wasnÂ’t there a moment ago. The womanÂ’s body is suspended horizontally in the air.20 19 Artaud 176. 20 Artaud 177.
15 By calling for the woman to be Â“suspended horizontally,Â” Artaud makes the woman into a passive, sexual object. However, Dulac removes the woman from her place as an object and her interpretation ha s the woman actively leaning ove r the side of the boat to kiss the officer/priest. In this more roma nticized version, the wo man controls of the situation, not the clergyman. Artaud was understandably attached to hi s screenplay and had, at one time, envisioned himself as the filmÂ’s director. In her interview with the Virmauxs, Pecker states, Â“Germaine Dulac was a woman with some talent. She proved this in other films. But she was not the director who was suited to adapting an Artaud script for the screen. No one other than himself could have done it.Â”21 Artaud placed his own interpretations about obsession, desire and gender into the scri pt and seems to have had his own views as to how these concepts, which often emerge from his attempt to understand his own identity, are presented to the audience. As Naomi Greene argues in her article Â“Artaud and Film: A Reconsideration,Â” Â“( Artaud) writes to capture the se lf, to give form to what is deepest and most inchoate in him.Â”22 Many critics of the film have argued that the volatile character of the clergyman is a repres entation of Artaud himsel f. In fact, Artaud was initially cast to play the role of the cl ergyman, but circumstances prevented him from doing so. Some of the controversy about the film stems from the assertion that Dulac deliberately chose another actor, Alex Allin, to play the clergyman. However, at the time when production of the film was to begin, Ar taud was already working on another film, Carl DreyerÂ’s La Passion de Jeanne dÂ’Arc While the actual facts are not clear, it is 21 Virmaux93. 22 Naomi Greene, Â“Artaud and Film: A Reconsideration,Â” Cinema Journal 23.4 (1984) 28-40.
16 generally believed that Artaud was unable to receive adequate time off from DreyerÂ’s film, and Dulac, who was probably aware of ArtaudÂ’s attachment to his script and his aggressive personality, was not willing to adapt the shooting schedule to accommodate his schedule. Many of DulacÂ’s critics, and even Artaud himself, believed Dulac set the shooting schedule to exclude Artaud from the production. Alain and Odette Virmaux suggest that Â“he must have, at that point, seen the situation as persecution, and convinced himself the Dulac deliberately delayed th e beginning of shooting for a few days.Â”23 Despite this, Artaud never outwa rdly expressed his objections, especially to Dulac. The Virmauxs further suggest that Â“it is more likely that Dulac would have wanted to remain in charge of the production and not have to depend on the chance circumstances of another shooting.Â”24 While he realized he was not goi ng to play the clergyman, Â“there is room to believe that he hoped, on the othe r hand, to be able to follow the production fairly closely, not of course as DulacÂ’s assist ant [Â…] but as a sort of technical advisor.Â”25 Dulac Â“agreed to direct ArtaudÂ’s screenplay (and) was prepared to shoot it as faithfully as possible and to take into acc ount his suggestions before th e shooting (but) she did not want him present during the shooting at all, not as spectator, a nd especially not as advisor. She intended to remain absolutely in charge of the set.Â”26 Â“In fact, Dulac only met with him once, just before the shooting, on July 13th 1927 immediately after which, the same evening, Artaud wrote a very long le tter, the longest of the lot, accompanied with a sketchÂ”27 of the black and white tile floor, wh ich Dulac includes in the film. 23 Virmaux 102. 24 Virmaux 100. 25 Virmaux 101. 26 Virmaux 101. 27 Virmaux 99.
17 So how did the controversy over the film begin? The first major conflict arose from DulacÂ’s original title of the f ilm, Â“Â…dream by Antonin Artaud, directed by Germaine Dulac.Â”28 Artaud objected to the use of the word Â“dreamÂ” in the title. According to him, Â“( La Coquille et le ClergymanÂ’s ) screenplay is not the reproduction of a dream and it should not be considered as suc h. I will not try to explain its incoherence by the easy way out of the dream.Â”29 Although Dulac removed the word from the title, the stigma from its use remained and lead to accusations that Dulac had Â“given a strictly dream-like interpretation of the screenplayÂ”30 and had Â“neutralized (the filmÂ’s images) by treating them as being simply the representation of a dream.Â”31 Artaud never wanted La Coquille et le Clergyman to be seen as a dream itself, but instead wanted to represent the dream process by seeing Â“how far a scenario could identify with the mechanics of the dream Â‘without being a dream itselfÂ’. For Ar taud, the dream could never be a narrative which could be easily followed by a spectator because Â“a dream always collapsed into violence and fragmentationÂ”32 and the process of the dream often creates harsh juxtapositions of images. According to St ephen Barber, ArtaudÂ’s primary objection with DulacÂ’s interpretation is how Â“the film had sutured toge ther the raw and disjunctive images of his scenario, so that the film flowed easily for the spectator, despite the illogicality of its narrative.Â”33 Instead of creating a narra tive for the viewer to easily understand, as Dulac did, Artaud wanted to take the viewer through the process of a dream. He most likely saw the cinema as th e perfect means to visually express this 28 Virmaux 103. 29 Virmaux 104. 30 Virmaux 103-4. 31 Barber 12. 32 Barber 14. 33 Barber 12.
18 process, since it allowed for the interpreta tion of Â“the surreali st principles of displacement and dissoci ative juxtaposition.Â”34 Based on these observations, it becomes easy to see how Artaud might have objected to DulacÂ’s interpreta tion. DulacÂ’s emphasis on ligh ting, slow-motion shots, and the use of numerous dissolves, rather than a harsh juxtaposition of images proposed by Artaud, creates a loose narrative. Â“For Dulac, whose Symbolist antecedents led her to regard the cinematic image as the site of a fusion, the film was conceived as a condensation of associations whose gradual accretion of meaning allowed the story to proceed, image by image, in a chain of metaphors.Â”35 Each scene is tied together by some element to create continuity. When th e clergymanÂ’s shell is taken away from him by the officer, he crawls along the ground until he sees the beautiful woman with the officer. The viewer then makes the connecti on that the clergyman is following the man. The woman becomes the replacement for the shell. The clergyman rips the womanÂ’s shell shaped bra off, then is seen holding it in the next scene. What becomes interesting to note is the criticism that Dulac followed Arta udÂ’s script almost exactly. If this is the case, then one might be able to make the a ssertion that ArtaudÂ’s screenplay did indeed have a loose narrative and neve r had the dissociative juxtapos ition he wanted. If Artaud had directed his own film, w ould the film have the same loose narrative as DulacÂ’s interpretation? The use of the word Â“dreamÂ” was not the only conflict between Artaud and Dulac. According to the Virmauxs, Â“Another more serious grievance was formulated by Artaud and his friends: Dulac distorted the scr eenplay because she understood absolutely 34 Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, Â“The Image and th e Spark: Dulac and Artaud Reviewed,Â” Dada and Surrealist Film Rudolf E. Kuenzli, Ed. (New York: Willis Locker and Owens, 1987) 110-1. 35 Flitterman-Lewis, Â“ImageÂ” 111.
19 nothing.Â”36 This issue arose from a misunders tanding of the script. According to ArtaudÂ’s script, But as he grasps the skirts of his cassock to draw them around his thighs, these skirtÂ–tails seem to stretch out, forming an endless road into night. The clergyman and woman r un desperately into night.37 Due to a typographical error, Dulac filmed th e scene where the skirt tails only turn into a Â“huge nightshirt.Â” Instead of running down a path with the woman, the clergyman simply runs off holding the long tails of the shirt. In addition, Artaud Â’s script at this point reads as though the clergyman and woman run o ff into the night together. DulacÂ’s interpretation has a chase scene ensue where various, alternating point-of-view shots provide the viewer with the pe rspective of the woman, as she looks back at the pursuing clergyman, as well as the perspective of the cl ergyman as he tries desperately to catch up with the woman. Perhaps the biggest issue between Artaud and Dulac deals with the ownership and intellectual copyrights of the fil mmaker and the screen writer. La Coquille et le Clergyman and later Brecht and PabstÂ’s lawsuit over BrechtÂ’s The Threepenny Opera,38 36 Virmaux 104. 37 Artaud 176-7. 38 According to Richard Fawkes, Â“Brecht and Weill were paid a lump sum and put on retainers to rework the script and music. Brecht began working on a screenplay with Caspar Neher and, without telling anyone, not even Weill, radically altered the framework and plot of the stage show. When Nero Films found out, they were horrified. They had paid for a h it opera and that was what they wanted to see on the screen. Both he and Weill had it written into their contracts that they would have the last word on all matters concerning words and music, and he was determined to exercise that right. He refused to do any more work and when the producers opted to go ahead w ithout him, decided to sue. Brecht lost, the court deeming that by refusing to work on the script any further, he had broken his contract. He was ordered to pay costs, but the production company, not wanting any more aggravation, agreed to waive the payment provided that he agreed to stay away from the film. They also paid him an additional fee Â“( Opera on Film (London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd., 2000) 76). Si milarly to DulacÂ’s interpretation of ArtaudÂ’s script, Â“PabstÂ’s film of The Threepenny Opera sticks closely to BrechtÂ’s revised screenplay, but although a left-ofcentre liberal, he softened much of the original social criticism by concentrating upon the relationships between the principal charactersÂ” (76). It is also inte resting to note that Artaud ironically Â“had a small role
20 raised the question as to whom a film belongs. In La Coquille et le Clergyman Â’s contract, both Dulac and Artaud were given equal rights to the film, a stipul ation which Â“would be detrimental (since) each of them strove to turn the situation to his or her advantage.Â”39 The Virmauxs suggest that ArtaudÂ’s Â“objective, and that of Yvonne Allendy,40 was constantly to impose the idea that the Seashell was first of all Â‘an Artaud film.Â’Â”41 By doing this, Artaud would have edged Dulac out of the way in order to take complete credit for the film. Several documents also suggest Artaud was not as unhappy with the film as he led people to believe. The Virma uxs note that Â“the boxes of invitations for the evening of February 9th, 1928 were marked Â‘Antonin ArtaudÂ’s The Seashell and the Clergyman Â’ (and not: Â‘screenplay byÂ…Â’). If Ar taud had had the feeling of being so betrayed by the production, would he have so openly assumed the authorship of the filmÂ”42? They also note that a pamphlet Â‘Opinion of the press on the film The Seashell and the Clergyman,Â’43 which marginalized DulacÂ’s role in the creation of the film, was found. Based on these documents, the Virma uxs believe Â“(ArtaudÂ’s and the AllendyÂ’s) plan was to handle (Dulac) carefully, to reduc e her role to simple technical assistance, speak of her as little as possible, and, thus discretely push her out of the way. According to this plan, the film would have been seen as the work of Artaud al one, all the rest being no more than technical matte rs of little importance.Â”44 This is quite possible given in G.W. PabstÂ’s film of Bertolt BrechtÂ’s The Threepenny Opera a film which Artaud despised for what he called its Â‘vulgarity and its complete disorientation Â” (Barber 23). 39 Virmaux 111. 40 La Coquille et le Clergyman is said to have been based on the dreams of Yvonne Allendy, which she had written down. 41 Virmaux 108. 42 Virmaux 108. 43 According to the Virmauxs, ArtaudÂ’s name Â“is mentioned (in the pamphlet) a good fifteen times, while DulacÂ’s is mentioned only five times. She is never attacked, but the entire pamphlet tends to substantiate the idea that Artaud is the veritable author of the film.Â” (108) 44 Virmaux 108.
21 ArtaudÂ’s personality and his lack of funding to direct the film hi mself. It is not out of the question that Artaud would have used the Surre alist groupÂ’s volatile nature to create a controversy surrounding DulacÂ’s interpretation. However, Artaud underestimated Dulac. The Virmauxs believe that Dulac was we ll aware of ArtaudÂ’s motives. This would explain why she kept to a tig ht production schedule and w hy kept Artaud away from the production aspects of the film, including the f ilmÂ’s pre-screenings. In fact, Dulac only met with Artaud once before production began. While she did incorporate suggestions made by Artaud into the film, she excluded him from all aspects of the shooting and editing processes. Â“An almost inevitable repe rcussion of this was th at Artaud, irritated for having seen himself Â‘sidelinedÂ’ for so long, d ecided to react, and show proof of his own rights with respect to the work.Â”45 Artaud published his screenplay in the N. R. F before the filmÂ’s premiere without giving Dulac any credit for her in terpretation of the screenplay. The way presentation of the artic le created the illusion that Artaud himself directed the film. Dulac, ups et about not being given her due credit protested to the journal, bringing light to the i ssue of directorial credits. Â“For quite a while, the writers had difficulty understanding that the directors of the films, also, spoke in the first person. A screenplayÂ—even signed by a big nameÂ—is inevitably asked to disappear behind the universe and the style partic ular to the filmmaker.Â”46 ArtaudÂ’s position as the author of the work certainly must have made it difficu lt for him to give up creative control. After La Coquille et le Clergyman Dulac created only a handful of films and newsreels. Some people believe she re tired from making films because of the controversy of the film. This may be part of the reason, but it is di fficult to believe that 45 Virmaux 109. 46 Virmaux 110.
22 she would have caved to the pressures because of what happened. It is more likely that the advent of sound technology in film a nd DulacÂ’s protest against its extreme commercialization, especially with the incorpor ation of the voice, caused her to focus on writing about the cinema. After the cont roversy settled, ArtaudÂ’s adamant position against the filmÂ’s interpretation softened a nd he ironically wrote in 1932, Â“This type of film belonged, even and above all when compos ed during a waking state, to the dark and secret logic of the dream.Â”47 It is unclear what caused him to become more accepting of the film. Perhaps it was the inherent change in film aesthetics, or even his separation from the Surrealists. However, the controversy surrounding La Coquille et le Clergyman was probably more of a benefit to both Dulac and Artaud, due to the publicity it received. Even today, both Artaud and Dulac are given credit for La Coquille et le Clergyman each in his or her own way. 47 Virmaux 104.
23 Chapter Two Interpretation of a Dream: Germ aine Dulac and the Avant-Garde When we think of what constitutes the avant-garde, we often think about something new and cutting edge, something wh ich serves as an oppositional force to the current discourse. To unders tand avant-garde film, we need to examine the structure of classic cinema. Classic cinema often involves a narrative stru cture which drives the story forward while serving as Â“a means of organizing the recipientÂ’s experience.Â”48 The organization of the classic film often presen ts a false sense of r eality which Â“prevails upon the reader or spectator to conform to its power structure and to enjoy vicariously the sense of coherence, omniscien ce, and mastery it engenders.Â”49 The reality seen on the screen is carefully constructed by the filmmake r, providing the viewer a one-sided look at only the elements, characters, and events whic h the filmmaker carefu lly selects as being important. The avant-garde film tears apart this structure and in turn the Â“illusionary authorityÂ”50 created within it. Instead of a carefully structured narrative, as typically seen in classic cinema, the avant-garde film uses Â“a mode of constructing reality in which the dominant discourses of time, space and causality, identity and difference are fundamentally destabilized.Â”51 This destabilization crea tes juxtapositions, awkward transitions and a jarring effect for the view er. Classic cinemaÂ’s mere depiction of a 48 Richard Murphy, Theorizing the Avant-Garde: Modernism, Expressionism and the Problem of Postmodernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998) 202. 49 Murphy 202. 50 Murphy 203. 51 Murphy 203.
24 reality (the narrative structure) creates an outside perspectiv e, as though the viewer were looking through a window at the on-screen action, whereas the avant-garde film creates an inside world of experience based on the pe rspectives of the characters. As we all know from our own lives, events never unfold in the same narrative manner as seen in the classic cinematic form. Our daily structure often changes as the une xpected enters into our routines. Often our inner thoughts and emotions run through our minds simultaneously with our actions. Think about how often we engage into a conversation with someone, while thinking about something co mpletely different. It is the reality of experience which the avant-garde looks to capture. In DulacÂ’s films, we become Madame Beudet or the clergyman and through th e characters, we live their lives, even if is for a brief span of time. Since its inception, the cinema, both clas sic and avant-garde, has been created with certain traditions and conventions stemmi ng from the male perspective. The avantgarde provided women filmmakers more of a means of self expression, whereas the classic cinema often excluded women from its ranks. The avant-gardeÂ’s focus on recreating experiences, rather than simply de picting a Â“classicÂ” narrative, allowed women to focus on form and style as they Â“(re-thought) conventions for themselves, shaping them so as to make them se rve their particular projects.Â”52 Instead of having to conform to the patriarchal structure of the male domin ated classic cinema, the avant-garde cinema provided female filmmakers Â“an outlet for th eir inner experiences, sensations, feelings, 52 E. Ann Kaplan, Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera (New York: Methuen, Inc, 1983) 87.
25 (and) thoughts.Â”53 Germaine Dulac, one of FranceÂ’s most influential female filmmakers, turned to the avant-garde because of this. DulacÂ’s works often fall into a category called the Â“First Avant-Garde,Â” also known as the Â“ImpressionistÂ” cinema. The Impressionist filmmakers were often interested in creating Â“altera tions not only between actions in different spaces or periods of time, between reality and either memory or fantasy, but also between multiple image chains.Â”54 These image chains link scenes which would not otherwise correlate together using reoccurring elements or symbolism. Filmmakers from this movement, including Dulac, considered the Impressionist film Â“the Â‘psychological film,Â’ which places a Â‘character in a particular situ ationÂ…in order to penetrate in to the secret domain of his inner life.Â’Â”55 Just as the Impressionist pain tersÂ—Monet, Degas, RenoirÂ—sought to capture psychological perceptions and em otions through the use of color and brushstrokes, the Impressionist filmmakers us ed a more formalistic approach to their films as they attempted to capture the sa me perceptions and emotions through their cinematic techniques, especially the use of soft focus shots and a reliance on lighting. As Dulac writes, Impressionism made us see nature and its objects as elements concurrent with the action. A shadow, a light, a flower had, a bove all, a meaning, as the reflection of a mental state or an emotional situation, then, little by little, became a necessary complement, having an intrinsic value of its own. We experimented with making 53 Kaplan 88-9. 54 Abel 293. 55 Abel 280.
26 things move through the science of optics, tried to transform figures according to the logic of a state of mind.56 It is through these techniques that Dul ac captures the inner-mos t fantasies of Mme Beudet or the increasing insanity of the cler gyman. She embraces the idea of the art film and the idea of Â“pure cinema,Â” where moveme nt, form, and light all create a rhythmic balance and visual harmony. For Dulac, th e cinema evokes impressions and emotions through its techniques. The view er of the true film, the visu al film, with its combination of harmonies, agreements of shadow, of li ght, of rhythm, of m ovement, and facial expressions, should not be able to just relate to the f ilm, but also be drawn into the experience of the film.57 As a way to understand her cinematic approach, Dulac uses the example of a train track, where the tracks are simply multiplied lines of steel. As the wheels move over the tracks, a rhythm is created where the Â“mechanical movement follows the rhythm of a heartbeat.Â”58 It is this rhythm, formed by the visual elements of the film, which creates the sense of experi ence in DulacÂ’s films. According to Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, DulacÂ’s films often separated Â“the diegetic content of the films (their narrative meanings) from their formal st ructures (the way those meanings are organized).Â”59 In doing so, Dulac creates a percep tion of reality that perhaps becomes more Â“realÂ” than a traditional narrative. As an early feminist, the cinema pr ovided Dulac a means of Â“cinematic expression through the manipulation of form al elements, in order to provide an 56 Germaine Dulac qtd. in Abel 280. 57 This is summarized from my translation of DulacÂ’s article Visual and Anti-Visual Films from her book crits Sur le Cinma (Paris: ditions Paris Exprimental, 1994). 58 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 94. 59 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 47.
27 alternative to the dominant film pr actice, to speak in another voice.Â”60 In La Souriante Mme Beudet Dulac gives Mme Beudet a voice, whic h would be otherwise silenced in classic cinema, by exposing her inner-most thought s and fantasies to the viewer. It is not just Mme. BeudetÂ’s voice which is exposed, but also the voice of every other woman who faces the same situation as Mme. Beudet. In comparison to La Souriante Mme Beudet, La Coquille et le Clergyman does not focus on the inner struggles of the female character, but instead focuses on the increasing insani ty of the primary male character, the clergyman. While the focus is not on the fema le character, DulacÂ’s techniques still take the viewer through the process of insanity, ra ther than simply depicting a structured narrative where the clergyman goes insane a nd the viewer witnesses each small event which adds to the insanity. DulacÂ’s use of repetitious elements, especially the image of the clergyman in different scenarios, illust rates his Â“double-nature or Â‘decenteredness.Â’Â”61 Throughout the film, the clergyman is unable to take on the role of a character that sequentially moves through a daily routine, as you might see in a classic cinema narration. His existence is ma de up of an Â‘infinite series of confusing alternatives,Â”62 which will eventually lead to what Rich ard Murphy calls a Â“crisis of perception.Â”63 As the clergyman moves from scene to scene, he is never able to Â“distinguish clear and fixed identities and events.Â”64 One moment he happily fills his vials, while in the next moment, he is reduced to crawling on the ground. Af ter he gleefully swings the womanÂ’s bra in the air, it falls to the floor, busting into fl ames and sending the clergyman into a state of introverted despair. He locks the womanÂ’s im age away, only to turn a corner and find her 60 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 48. 61 Murphy 206. 62 Murphy 206. 63 Murphy 206. 64 Murphy 206.
28 with the fearsome officer. He kills the offi cer, but the officer returns. DulacÂ’s use of these various scenarios sets up a dreamlike st ate from which the clergyman is unable to emerge. Once he conquers or r econciles part of his life, some thing else enters into the scenario in opposition. Instead of following classic cinemaÂ’s Â“distinctions between Â‘insideÂ’ and Â‘outside,Â’ Â‘real ityÂ’ and Â‘hallucination,Â’ Â‘c onsciousnessÂ’ and Â‘dreamÂ’,Â”65 Dulac merges these distinctions in to the clergymanÂ’s inner struggles. It is easy to see how DulacÂ’s films fit into the idea of the avant-garde, given her own views toward the cinema. According to Dulac, Â“It seemed frivolous to place a character in a given situation without penetrati ng the secret domain of his [or her] interior life, of visualized feelings.Â”66 In the case of Madame Beude t, the viewer is drawn into the inner struggle of her lone liness and isolation, as well as her fantasy world through DulacÂ’s cinematic techniques which Â“render(s) female subjectivity filmically through the metaphoric figuration of he r characterÂ’s fantasies.Â”67 Instead of creating a structured narrative about Madame Beudet and her life Dulac takes the viewer into Madame BeudetÂ’s inner mind through soft focus and clos e up shots, distortions, manipulations and various camera angles. According to Jessi ca Benjamin, Â“An important component of womenÂ’s fantasy life centers around the wish for a holding ot her whose presence does not violate oneÂ’s space, but permits the experi ence of oneÂ’s own desire, who recognizes it when it emerges of itself.Â”68 The image of the male tennis player is a perfect example of BenjaminÂ’s argument. Mme BeudetÂ’s fantasies turn to the image of the tennis player in 65 Murphy 207. 66 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 89. 67 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 100. 68 Jessica Benjamin, Â“A Desire of OneÂ’s Own: Psychoanalytic Feminism and Intersubjective Space,Â” The Feminist Philosophy Reader ed. Alison Bailey and Chris Cuomo (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008 188-204) 200.
29 the photograph. He becomes real, emerging from the photograph, only in her fantasy world when she wants him to be real. Unlik e her husband, who is all too real, the tennis player can never violate her reality, since sh e can stop fantasizing about him and he will return to the flatness of the photograph. Each of Madame BeudetÂ’s fantasies Â“are anchored in the particulars of the (femal e) character (Dulac) creates, a frustrated, imprisoned housewife who longs for some sort of romantic evasion.Â”69 In the case of the clergyman, his i nner struggles are presented through his interactions with the other char acters in each of the sequences. In one scene he cowers at the presence of an officer/pries t. In another, we see him st rangling the officer/priest, and in yet another scene, we see the clergyman th rowing his rival off a cliff. The clergymanÂ’s interactions with the female character furt her add to his fantasy world. He rips the womanÂ’s bodice off in one scene and frantically chases her in another. He moves from one scene to another, but none of the scenes are ever truly resolved. Dulac plays with oppositions in the film, as well. We see an intermixing of the outside world, the world where the clergyman is reduced to crawling after the woman and where he frantically chases her down a path, and the inside wo rld, the world where the clergyman hears the womanÂ’s confession or where he wanders th rough a maze of hallways. At times, we never really know where the scenes are taking place. Dulac moves from one environment to another, yet each scene takes on a new and different context. We never know what is real and what is imagined in the clergymanÂ’s mind. Despite this shift, DulacÂ’s editing does create a narrative flow which can be followed by the viewer. 69 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 102.
30 DulacÂ’s approach to cinema Â“concentrat e(s) on the rhythmic play of light, movement and form over the content based c onventions of narrative causality and visual continuity of the traditional commercial cinema.Â”70 It is through th ese techniques that Dulac is able to take the cinema beyond a structured narrativ e with patriarchal conventions. She takes the film viewer into the inner realm of the human psyche. She creates a place where the female voice can be heard and understood rather than simply glanced over. As an avant-garde artist, she is able to Â“(reject) referentiality (Â…) in favor of the more cinematically Â‘pureÂ’ prop erties of light, rhythm and movementÂ”71 and present a form of cinema based on human experience. According to Dulac, Â“The avant-garde has provided the abstract research and manifestations of pur e thought and technique later applied to more clearly human films.Â”72 The experience of real ity Dulac creates in her films through her cinematic techniques, es pecially the reality from a feminine perspective, distinguishes her from her male counterparts and estab lishes her as a model for future avant-garde filmmakers. Â“Germaine Dulac also worked both sides of the fantasy genre. Two of her films ( La Folie des vaillants and LÂ’invitation au voyage) were produced independently and were consciously organized as visual ballets or music compositions.Â”73 In addition to being considered an im pressionistic filmmaker, Dulac is often considered one of FranceÂ’s influential Surr ealist filmmakers, a categorization which is deeply flawed, yet quite understandable, especially when examining La Coquille et le Clergyman The surrealist filmmakers were in terested in capturing emotions, inner 70 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 47. 71 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 90. 72 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 90. 73 Abel 150.
31 fantasies and the unconscious mind through the cinematic process. Both the impressionists and the surrealists used th e formal aspects of the cinema in a nonnarrative, juxtaposed way. Howe ver, the surrealists were not interested in creating visual harmony and they attempted to Â“play with illusion and displa ys of primal or infantile emotions.Â”74 As mentioned in the introduction, th e surrealist filmmakers focused more on harsh juxtapositions, violent actions and the fetishized portr ayal of the woman. While the Impressionist filmmakers cr eated aesthetically pleasing im ages of a fantasy life, the surrealists portrayed the volatile and anima listic urges locked deep within the human psyche. To the Surrealist filmmaker, Â“the pr esence of the image (representing an idea) is more influential on our awareness than the shot itself.Â”75 DulacÂ’s style in La Coquille et le Clergyman becomes difficult to analyze, mainly due to its screenplay having been written by Artaud, who incorporated his own surrealist ideologies into the work, as well as the fact th at she filmed the script as close to ArtaudÂ’s ideas as possible. While she does inherently use ArtaudÂ’s ideologies, she softens or even eliminates many of the truly surrealist asp ects of the script, thereby moving her away from the surrealist filmmaking style. Dulac eliminates the emphasis on violence, lessens the womanÂ’s role as the cause of fear, anxiety and desire in the male characters, and turns the volatile and violent clergym an of ArtaudÂ’s script into a cowardly character who can never take control of his own life until the very end of the f ilm. In some respects, she could even be considered as a filmmaker w ho bridges the gap between the avant-garde. Her focus on the viewerÂ’s ability to understa nd a film, coupled with the emphasis on the 74 Elza Adamowicz, Â“Bodies Cut and Diss olved: Dada and Surrealist FilmÂ”, Gender and French Cinema (Oxford: Berg, 2001) 21. 75 Gould 23.
32 technical aspects of the film, appears to combine both traditional and avant-garde aesthetics (both impressionistic and surrealist) to create her own style of filmmaking.
33 Chapter Three Objects, Symbolism and Metaphor in La Coquille et le Clergyman Of all the instances of symbolism in La Coquille et le Clergyman the woman is the most important representation. She is the one who brings the clergyman off his knees. She is his salvation and his object of desire but she will never be his. She is the one who is different from him, the Other, and her presence represents the missing and irreconcilable part of the clergymanÂ’s iden tity. While the film depicts the increasing insanity of the clergyman, the representa tion of the woman allows the viewer to understand the clergymanÂ’s insa nity from all angles. The clergyman first sees the beautiful wo man after a confrontation with an officer who berates the clergyman. The officer take s away the large shell, from which the clergyman fills the glass beakers, and slices the shell with a sword in a motion resembling castration. The clergyman, once content with simply filling the beakers, is reduced to cowering from the officer and crawling on the str eets of the city after him. When the clergyman sees the officer in a carriage with the beautiful woman, the clergyman associates the woman with the shell taken aw ay from him. The clergyman rises from the ground and his restless pursuit begins. The me re sight of the woman gives life to the clergyman, not only bringing him off his knees but also driving him to the brink of insanity. The woman becomes the represen tation of desire; a Â“concrete, visual
34 manifestation of unconscious force.Â”76 In DulacÂ’s interpretatio n, this desire does not appear to be sexual. The woman becomes a substitute for both the shell and the liquid in the beakers, thereby becoming a threat to th e clergyman by representing a missing part of him. Throughout the film, the clergyman relentlessly pursues the woman and will let nothing else stand in his way. This pursuit is not for sexua l gratification, at least in DulacÂ’s interpretation. Instead, Â“the woman is continually presented as representation.Â”77 When the clergyman first sees her, she is not a sexual object, but an embodiment of his subconscious self and, according to LacanÂ’s co ncept of the mirror stage, she represents the lost identity of the mother, which the cl ergyman constantly tries to reconcile. The clergymanÂ’s endless pursuit represents this at tempt at reconciliation. In order to begin the process of reconciling his lost identity, the clergyman must eliminate the authoritative male figure, the officer, in order to obtain the woman. When th e clergyman faces the officer, he becomes much more violent and obsessive, causing the Â“inner conflictual tension which leads to the awakening of his (the clergymanÂ’s) desire for the object (the woman) of the otherÂ’s (the officerÂ’s) desire.Â”78 Each strategy devised by the clergyman to eliminate the officer becomes more and mo re violent. These violent tendencies only cease when he obtains the woman. Once th e clergyman finally captures the womanÂ’s image and places it into a glass vase, the idea of the mirror stage no longer applies. The missing part of his identity, the woman, has been captured, implying a successful completion of the self. Lacan would re gard this completion as impossible. LacanÂ’s idea of the mirror stage only applies during the clergymanÂ’s pursuit. According to Lacan, the reconciliation with the missing identity can never truly be 76 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 120. 77 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 121. 78 Lacan 114.
35 complete. Once separated, the identity associat ed with the mother is no longer real and simply becomes a representation of an identity which the child constantly searches for. Once the clergyman captures the womanÂ’s essenc e, the process of reconciliation begins, but is not truly complete until the clergyman drops the vase holding the womanÂ’s image. The womanÂ’s image first turns into the clergymanÂ’s own image, then becomes the dark liquid from the introductory scenes of the f ilm. When the clergyman drinks this liquid, he finally completes his journey; fully reconciling his identity. It is difficult to ignore DulacÂ’ s treatment of the woman throughout La Coquille et le Clergyman Feminist writer, Simone de Beauvo ir sees the woman in a patriarchal system as Â“the privileged Other, through whom the subject fulfills himself: one of the measures of man, his counterbalance, his sa lvation, his adventure, his happiness.Â”79 Throughout the film, the woman of La Coquille et le Clergyman does maintain many qualities of the patriarchal society which doom her into Otherness, including her place as the object of desire, her passivity and her fe mininity. DulacÂ’s subtle interpretations change how this Otherness is viewed. Unlik e the masochistic behavior exhibited by the man in Man RayÂ’s LÂ’ toile de Mer who Â“adopts the attitude of a respectful bourgeois and starts to talk with the (woman) in a business like wayÂ”80 when he stands to leave after she undresses for him, the game seems endless for the clergyman. Since the woman never returns the clergymanÂ’s affections, he resorts of random act s of violence towards her. After the clergyman rips off the wo manÂ’s bodice, revealing her bare breasts, he waves the carapace shaped bra around in victor y much like a madman. In fact, when the clergyman sees the woman again in the next scen e, he reverts to his in sane pursuit of her. 79 Simone de Beauvoir, Â“Myths of Women in Five Authors,Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends 3rd ed, Ed. David H. Richter (Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007) 676. 80 ÂŽiek 1184.
36 DulacÂ’s woman fails to truly fulfill the clergym an. Despite his constant pursuit, he never finds salvation or happiness through her. In f act, he only finds balance when he releases the glass vase in which he had captured her essence. The clergyman, in his pursuit, is quite se lfish, never taking into consideration the womanÂ’s opinion of him. Â“This original condi tion is called Â‘primary narcissism,Â’ for one cannot respond to anyone else if one does not re alize that there is an ything more to the universe than oneÂ’s own feelings and needs. One is self absorbed-concerned only with oneself-by default.Â”81 Not only does the clergyman fail to consider the womanÂ’s feelings, he also must destroy everyt hing that comes between him a nd his object of his desire, especially the officer. The officer beco mes the father figure for the clergymanÂ—a constant authoritative figure. The clergym anÂ’s fearful reaction to the man in the beginning and the constant attempts to dest roy him to obtain the woman all suggest the concept of the Oedipus complex, where the cler gyman Â“fears that his father will castrate him if he persists in wooing his mother,Â”82 in this case, the female figure. Â“The Oedipus complex is all about narcissis tic wounds, and, as in the myth of Narcissus, sight plays a prominent part.Â”83 The clergyman, by either the natu re of his career as a clergyman or some lack which he tries to eliminate, sees himself as having the absence and the authoritative figure as having the presence. After the officer takes the shell away from the clergyman, the clergyman sees the officer with the beautiful woman. In a process ÂŽiek calls Â“sublimation,Â” where Â“an object, pa rt of everyday reality finds itself at the 81 Diana Tiejens Meyers, Gender in the Mirror: Cultu ral Imagery & WomanÂ’s Agency (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002) 116. 82 Meyers 116. 83 Meyers 116.
37 place of the impossible thing,Â”84 the woman then becomes the substitute for the shell. Having seen the officer strike the shell with a sword in a motion representing castration, the clergyman associates his sublimated object the woman, with castration. The idea of the oedipal complex is especially relevant in the brief scene where the clergyman witnesses the woman lean over the side of the boat to kiss the officer. His passivity quickly turns to rage as he lunges at the officer. In her analysis of Man RayÂ’s LÂ’ toile de Mer Inez Hedges examines the symbolism of the sea an d many of her observations certainly apply to La Coquille et le Clergyman According to Hedges, Â“the theme of the voyage into the unknown becomes a focus and metaphor for the experience of l ove; the voyage becomes associated with the mystic quest.Â”85 In La Coquille et le Clergyman the clergymanÂ’s quest is not for love, but rather, for self awar eness. Just as in LÂ’ toile de Mer where Â“the Â‘merÂ’ of the title is the dangerous sea on which th e alchemist sets out, searching for the unification of elements, represented as male and female (a nd) the starfish is the androgynous symbol that lies at the end of that search, encl osed in glass, the alchemistÂ’s vessel,Â”86 the sea in one brief segment of La Coquille et le Clergyman represents the clergymanÂ’s attempt at unifying what had been taken from hi m with his identity. The woman in La Coquille et le Clergyman can be compared to the starfish in LÂ’ toile de Mer. The clergyman must enclose her in the glass vase in order to end his quest. While Â“the woman (in LÂ’ toile de Mer ) becomes the path to the starfish,Â”87 the woman in La Coquille et le Clergyman will never end the clergymanÂ’s quest. As the clergyman realizes, capturing the womanÂ’s 84 ÂŽiek 1186. 85 Hedges 101. 86 Hedges 101. 87 According to Hedges, the starfish represents Â“t he symbol of the manÂ’s Surrealist quest; thus at the end of the film he can accept her lossÂ…becau se he has found the Â‘toileÂ’Â” (Hedges 105).
38 essence is impossible and he must break the woman free from the vase in order to reach the end. When we see the clergyman at the begi nning, filling the glass beakers with the liquid, it is quite unclear what he is doing. It is only at th e end that we realize that the liquid is actually the essence of the clergyman. According to Luce Irigaray, the Â“subjectÂ” (the clergyman) will be multiple, plural, sometimes diformed, but it will still postulate itself as the cause of all the mirages that can be enumerated endlessl y and therefore put back t ogether again as one. A fantastic, phantasmatic fragmentation. A destruct(tura)tion in which the Â“subjectÂ” is shattered, scuttled, while still claiming surreptitiously that he is the reason for it all.88 Each time the clergyman fills and then break s a beaker, a new, exact replica of the previous beaker appears. Â“The subject plays at multiplying himself, even deforming himself, in this process.Â”89 The liquid in the beakers repres ents part of the clergyman, his identity which he must separate into glass beakers and then methodically and mechanically destroy. Yet he seems quite c ontent with breaking the glass until the shell and the liquid in the shell are removed from him. Throughout the film, the clergymanÂ’s actions are very methodical and repetitious. Â“Session after session, in a procedure that is also regulated by visual-rememorative-laws, he repeats the same gesture rees tablishing the bar, the barred.Â”90 He continuously tries to reestablish his identity through his actions. Not only does he break the beakers, one after another, at the beginning of the film, but he al so partakes in other re petitious actions: his 88 Irigaray 135. 89 Irigaray 136. 90 Irigaray 138.
39 constant chase of the woman, his pacing th rough hallways once he captures the womanÂ’s image, even the allusion to a tennis match. Throughout all these actions, the clergyman never appears content, as though he must contin ue these actions in or der to reconcile his identity. As the film continues, the viewer sees the clergyman in a room with a vase. He beckons to something invisible, captures it and places it into the jar. The viewer is given a brief glimpse of the womanÂ’s face superimpos ed over the jar and realizes the clergyman has finally captured the woma nÂ’s essence in the glass vase. For the clergyman, this confinement of the woman does not lead to a true resolution. The ne xt few scenes show the clergyman walking through a series of endless hallways as he locks and unlocks doors. Â“Everywhere he runs into the walls of his palace of mirrors, the floor of which is in any case beginning to crack and break up.Â”91 As he walks through the hallways, it seems as though the clergyman is deep in self reflective thought. The hallways become the visual interpretati on of the clergymanÂ’s inner struggles Each time he turns a corner, he runs into a door which he must unlock, whic h Â“serves, of course, to distract him again from his specular imprisonment and becomes a diversion from the depths of his madness, pretext for an increase in attentiveness, vigilance, mastery.Â”92 These hallways turn into a windowless maze, through which, the clergyman must find his way out of. Similar to Louis AragonÂ’s description of the passageways in the Passage de lÂ’Opra, the hallways through which the clergyman paces become a Â“privileged zone of fantasy and desire.Â” 93 91 Irigaray 137. 92 Irigaray 137. 93 According to Joanna Malt, Louis AragonÂ’s 1926 Le Paysan de Paris is Â“the archetypical surrealist textÂ” in which Â“Aragon pursues a detailed and methodical inventory of every business, character and physical feature of the condemned Passage de lÂ’Opra, sometimes interrupting his account with
40 He is seemingly at the apex of peace, sin ce his Â“fantasy and (object of) desire,Â” the woman, is locked up where she can no longer torture him. For Aragon Â“the passageway, and what lies beyond the passageway make up two different worlds, Â“the internal and external realities.Â”94 While he is in the hallways, the clergyman is locked into his Â“innerÂ” fantasy where the woman is locked away. The reality of the wo man actually not being captured represents the Â“externalÂ” reality, wh ich the clergyman attempts to block out of his mind. The clergyman himself is very similar to Aragon, who Â“describes his own actions as predatory, and sees himself caught up in a chain in which he finds his prey and is prey to someone else.Â”95 At this point, the clergyman should be satisfied since he finally captured the woman, yet something appe ars to still be missi ng from his life. When he turns the corner and runs into the woman with the officer, the clergyman realizes the woman still eludes him and the pursuit resumes. However, as the clergyman later realizes, the woman is not the cause of his anxiety. Throughout La Coquille et le Clergyman, DulacÂ’s use of symbolism changes how the woman is seen, especially when compared to ArtaudÂ’s original script. Despite her Otherness from the clergyman, Dulac uses her, as well as various objects, to further illustrate the clergymanÂ’s increasing insanity. Aside from her portrayal of the woman, the DulacÂ’s visual interpretations of the shell, the sea, the glass vase and the hallways add depth to characters and acti ons which might only be seen as one-dimensional. fantastical episodes, imaginary dialogues, and nonsensical poemÂ” (Johanna Malt, Obscure Objects of Desire: Surrealism, Fetishism, and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) 42-3.) 94 Malt 44. 95 Malt 45.
41 Chapter Four Spectatorship and the Gaze in La Coquille et le Clergyman In 1949, Simone de BeauvoirÂ’s book, The Second Sex introduced the idea Â“that gender is a matter of culture, acquired thr ough social conditioning, rather than being Â‘naturalÂ’ or innate.Â”96 In Western civilization, a ll of the cultural practices97 are based in the patriarchal views and Â“lawsÂ” of society a nd these views Â“are the vehicles for myths, created by men and construc ted from their viewpoint.Â”98 Certainly the film industry, from its beginnings through today, has created fi lms from a masculine perspective. If we examine the roles, positions and treatment of the female characters in the majority of films, we would notice the woman is either extremely passive, subj ecting herself to the desires of the male character, or, if she is given a sense of power, she submits in some way to the male character at the end of th e film. More importantly, the way in which filmmakers depict these wome n affects how the spectator views a film. Laura MulveyÂ’s 1975 article, Â“Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cine ma,Â” sparked a new interest in the idea of spectatorship in films, especially how the female character is viewed. In the article, Mulvey makes the assertion that the woman is Â“displayed for the gaze and enjoyment of men, the active controllers of the look.Â”99 By using FreudÂ’s idea of scopophilia, the 96 Shohini Chaudhuri, Feminist Film Theorists: Laura Mu lvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa De Laurentis, Barbara Creed (London: Routledge, 2006) 16. 97 According to Chaudhuri, these practices come from Â“religion, traditions, language, tales, songs, and moviesÂ” 98 Chaudhuri 16. 99 Mulvey 1177.
42 pleasure found in looking, Mulvey examines how the nature of the cinema allows the female on screen representation to become e ither the fetishized object of the gaze or the object which the viewer identifies with. Mulv eyÂ’s theories are one sided, focusing on the male viewer, not the female viewer. Sin ce MulveyÂ’s article came out, the works of subsequent theorists, including Kaja Silverman, Mary Ann Doan e, Teresa de Lauretis and others, have examined how the cinema a ffects female spectatorship as well. Contemporary film criticism has makes us more aware of the role gender plays. We can now look back at early films such as La Coquille et le Clergyman and LÂ’toile de Mer and further analyze how each director appr oaches the ideas of gender, desire and spectatorship. In MulveyÂ’s analysis, the fema le character in the film provides the means by which the Â“man can live out his fantas ies and obsessionsÂ” simply by observing the actions of the female on screen. 100 The on-screen character of the clergyman in La Coquille et le Clergyman thereby provides an outlet for th e male viewer to live out his fantasies without actually acting. While Mulvey Â’s theories apply to the male viewer and became the catalyst for subsequent feminist wr itings about female representation in film, the focus remains on the desires of the male spectator, and her theories fail to present a larger picture of how the female form is ultimately treated in regards to the female spectator. As Kaja Silverman points out, the view er in MulveyÂ’s theories Â“occupies a specifically masculine position (where) this vi ewer, whether in fact a man or a woman, identifies with the look of the male protagonist.Â”101 For Silverman, the distance between the filmÂ’s characters and the spectator mimics the separation created between the mother 100 Mulvey 1173. 101 Kaja Silverman, Â“Lost Objects and Mistaken Subjects,Â” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader ed. Sue Thornham (New York : New York University Press, 1999) 102.
43 and the infant in LacanÂ’s mirror stage. As Silv erman points out, Â“it is this irrecoverability of the object to subject, this irreducible di stance separating representation from the real, that cinema has often seemed destined to overcome.Â”102 This takes the idea of the mirror stage beyond the confines of the relationships between the on-screen characters. Through the viewing of the film, the spect ator begins to some missing pa rt of his or her identity. The female representation becomes the lost pa rt of the viewerÂ’s id entity. This more gender neutral approach allows more room for interpretation of the female viewerÂ’s relationship with the female character on scr een, from a feminine point of view, rather than the masculine point of vi ew asserted by Mulvey. Mary Ann Doane takes this further stati ng, Â“while the male is locked into sexual identity, the female can at least pretend she is the other.Â”103 Instead of forming a sexualized desire of the female character, the male viewer recognizes her more as the identity he once lost after the separation from his mother. Doane points out that the ideas of spectatorship mentioned by Mulvey defi nes spectatorship in terms of Â“either voyeurism or fetishism, as precis ely a pleasure in seeing what is prohibited in relation to the female body.Â”104 The act of the clergyman stripp ing the woman of her shell-bra thereby reinforces the idea of the woman as a sexualized object. DulacÂ’s use of close up shots, soft focus and various perspectives further reinforces the womanÂ’s place as an object of desire. Â“The image orchestrates a gaze, a limit and its pleasurable transgression. The womanÂ’s beauty, her very desirability, becomes a function of certain practices of 102 Silverman 99. 103 Mary Ann Doane, Â“Film and the Masquerade,Â” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader ed. Sue Thornham (New York: New York University Press, 1999) 138. 104 Doane 132.
44 imagingÂ—framing, lighting, camera movement, angle.Â”105 However, it is the use of cinematic techniques which cha nges the spectatorship of a fi lm. By using the close up and point-of-view shots from the womanÂ’s pers pective, Dulac allows the female spectator to identify with the woman on screen. Doane argues that Â“Given the closeness of this relationship, the spectatorÂ’s desire can be described only in terms of a kind of narcissismÂ—the female look demands a becoming.Â”106 The female viewer looks upon the female character to see a reflec tion of her own self and in th is reflection; she recognizes some aspect of herself which is missing. Teresa de Lauretis takes DoaneÂ’s theories a step further. De Lauretis divides spectatorship into Â“two sets of identifications.Â”107 The first set is the separation of Â“the masculine, active identification with the gaze [the looks of the camera and of the male characters from] the passive, femi nine identity with the imageÂ”108 as seen in MulveyÂ’s argument. The second identification Â“allows the female spectator to occupy both active and passive positions of desire at onceÂ—she is doubly desiring spectator whose desire is simultaneously Â‘desire for the other, and desire to be desired by the other.Â’Â”109 Not only is the woman of La Coquille et le Clergyman an object of desire for the clergyman, but her presence makes the clergyman almost wa nt to become her in his search for his identity. 105 Doane 132. 106 Doane, Â“FilmÂ” 135. 107 De Lauretis qtd Chaudhuri 72. 108 De Lauretis qtd Chaudhuri 72. 109 De Lauretis qtd Chaudhuri 72.
45 What makes La Coquille et le Clergyman an interesting example to examine in the context of the various theories about spectatorship and the gaze is the feminine perspective Dulac instills into the film, despite the masculinity of its screenwriter, Antonin Artaud. When the clergyman first observes the female character, he becomes obsessed with her despite the fact that she is seemingly involved with another man. As the clergyman watches her, his desire becomes so great, he must act upon these desires. Not only is the female character looked upon by her on-screen male counterparts, the clergyman and his nemesis, the womanÂ’s on-scre en lover, but she also becomes an object to the implied male viewer, an effect height ened by DulacÂ’s unique use of camera angles, point of view shots and vari ous other cinematic techniques. In comparison to the techniques used in traditional cinematic produc tions, where Â“the position of the spectators in the cinema is blatantly one of repression of their exhibitionism and projection of the repressed desire onto the performer,Â”110 DulacÂ’s techniques give the viewer the feeling of being part of the on-screen action, taking on th e role of a silent character throughout the film. The beginning of the film opens with a hand held shot as the camera/spectator moves through a passageway and through the do or. The spectator then takes the position of standing directly behind the clergyman. At this point, the spectator is merely a silent observer. As the film progresses, Dulac in corporates several point -of-view shots which change the position of the spectator. Through th e use of shot, reverse shot editing, we see the clergyman and what the clergyman sees. We see the clergyma n crawling through the streets. As he stops suddenly, we see the beautiful woman from the clergymanÂ’s perspective. The spectator moves from being a silent observer of the clergyman to being 110 Mulvey 1174.
46 the clergyman himself. In the pursuit scene through the park, Dulac uses point of view shots from the perspective of both the clergyman and the woman to change whom the viewer identifies with. One shot shows the viewpoint of th e clergyman, with the distant image of woman running away from him. These point of view shots from the clergymanÂ’s perspective confor m to the idea that the male character, and thus the male viewer, must capture the woman either to reconc ile some missing part of his identity or to eliminate his obsessive desire of the woman. The female vi ewer feels empathy with the woman, silently urging her to r un faster to escape the grasp of the clergyman. Dulac then cuts to the perspective of the woman, who is looking back and her pursuer, the clergyman running towards her/the viewer. DulacÂ’s point-of-view shots from the womanÂ’s perspective create empathy with her from both the male and female viewerÂ’s perspective. Instead of identifying with the clergyman and hi s attempt at reconciling his lost identity, empathy is created with the female character a nd the viewer feels that he or she is the one pursued. Through the use of these various perspectives, especial ly the use of the womanÂ’s point-of-view shots, the viewer rela tes to all the characters, regardless of gender. Compared with La Coquille et le Clergyman where the viewer develops a more intimate relationship with the characters thr ough point-of view shots and various camera angles, films such as Man RayÂ’s LÂ’toile de Mer create a sense of separation between the characters and the viewers. Â“It is prec isely this opposition between proximity and distance, control of the image and its loss, wh ich locates the possibilities of spectatorship within the problematic of sexual difference.Â”111 In LÂ’toile de Mer, the first sense of 111 Doane 132.
47 intimacy coincides with the first view of the female form, when the camera shows a full, unfocused and quite distorted shot of a ma n and a woman walking towards the camera, allowing the viewer to distinguish only the sh apes of the two people. Man RayÂ’s use of distortion not only obscures the act ions in the scene, but further heightens the sense that the filmÂ’s viewer, presumably male, is b ecoming a voyeur for his own pleasure. This plays into MulveyÂ’s concept of Â“the determ ining male gaze project(ing) its fantasy onto the female figure, which is styled accordingly.Â”112 The male character in the film gives a silent permission to the viewer by watching th e femaleÂ’s sexualized actions. This makes it acceptable to look at the female and consider her as a sexualized object, since she falls into a Â“traditional exhibitioni st role (where) women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact.Â”113 Whereas DulacÂ’s cinematic techniques allow the viewer to reconcile a lost identity, the glass used by Man Ray to create the sense of separati on further removes the viewer from ever reconciling any lost identity which might have occurred after the separation from the mother. The viewer of LÂ’toile de Mer Â’s highly sexualized images of the woman and the nonchalant attitude of the male character tends to de velop a connection with the sexual desires of the male character s. In contrast, the viewer of La Coquille et le Clergyman develops a sense of empathy with th e female character since he or she becomes a witness to the male characterÂ’s obsessive behavior to wards the woman. As opposed to DulacÂ’s clergyman, who obsessi vely acts on his desires, the man in LÂ’toile de Mer sits on the bed and voyeuristically watches the woman undress rapidly, only to turn away as the wo man lies on the bed in a pose reminiscent of GiorgioneÂ’s 112 Mulvey 1175. 113 Mulvey 1175.
48 Sleeping Venus or TitianÂ’s Venus of Urbino. The man looks at her and turns away once more, almost in disgust, although it is a b it difficult to tell his emotions through the distorted image. The facial expr essions of the male character in LÂ’toile de Mer are not crucial, as they are in La Coquille et le Clergyman where the crazed, emotional expressions of the clergyman add to the sens e of empathy created between the viewer and the female character. In the scene from LÂ’toile de Mer the male subject is a voyeur, watching the object of the gaze as she bares all for his plea sure. Yet her nude form all but repulses him. Once he has made his observations of her body, his pleasure of looking at her diminishes, and he departs without fulfillmen t of any sexual urges that he might have experienced. The erotic nature of the act of a striptease causes a reaction in the male character where the Â“[w]oman is desexualized at the very moment when she is stripped naked.Â”114 It is through this statement that one begins to understand how the gaze sustains a fantasy. The woman is the object of desire as long as the seductive play remains. Once that ends, then the woman ceases to be the object and the desire wanes. The male spectator loses interest, thus b ecoming indifferent to the woman once pursued as the object of desire, as s een with the male character in LÂ’toile de Mer. Dulac approaches the idea of the woman as an object of desire differently. In La Coquille et le Clergyman the act of the striptease is not volunta ry, as the clergyman is the one ripping the bodice off the woman, not the woman hersel f, and once the woman is stripped naked, the clergymanÂ’s desires only increase. Why does Dulac differ from the male perspective presented by Man Ray? Is she using her expe riences as a woman to illustrate reality? Is 114 Roland Barthes, Â“Striptease,Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends 3rd ed., ed. David H. Richter (Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007) 869.
49 she presenting a criticism of the viewpoint seen in LÂ’toile de Mer where the woman, once stripped naked, Â“connotes something that the look continually circles around but disavows: her lack of a penis, implying a threat of castration and hence displeasureÂ”115? The experience of viewing these films, to the voyeur, is not to completely satisfy any animalistic urges, but to simply observe th e object of desire. If he acts on his urges or if the woman surpasses the rate of his fi ctional desire, the object will cease to be the object of desire. It seems that DulacÂ’s approach is to create a male character incapable of self-control. The female repr esentation remains the object of the gaze, thus becoming the object of desire, whether it is a sexual desire which can never be fulfilled or the desire to reconcile the missing portion of th e subconscious identity. As the male characters in both films attempt to satisfy their desires, the viewer develops a relationship with the female that has become the object of desire. 115 Mulvey 1177.
50 Conclusion After the release of La Coquille et le Clergyman Dulac directed several other films, such as La Princesse Mondane her last commercial film. As sound films became popular, the avant-garde aesthetic, at least as Dulac envisioned it, began to fade. According to Sandy Flitterman-Lewis, Dulac Â“felt that th e exciting potentials of the sound film could not be fully explored so long as the emphasis remained on the verbal text and sound remained simply a means to accrue greater realism to the image.Â”116 She turned to writing about the cinema, founding Â“a subsidiary group of Gaumont to produce a Â‘magazine of filmed news eventsÂ’,Â”117as well as teaching film courses. The majority of DulacÂ’s films deal with the inner struggles of the main characters; Madame BeudetÂ’s struggle to find her own identity through her fantasy world and the clergymanÂ’s struggle to reclaim a missing part of his identity. She also places part of he r feminine aesthetic into her films, moving them, as seen in the dance scene in La Coquille et le Clergyman away from masculine portrayals of wome n. Throughout her filmmaking career, she exemplified the avant-garde style through her emphasis on visual harmony. Dulac died in 1942, leaving a legacy of avant-garde f ilmmaking which influenced many subsequent directors. As a filmmaker who embraced the Â“impressi onisticÂ” aesthetics of the avant-garde, Dulac is able to take the viewer on a journe y into the inner psyche of her characters. 116 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 70. 117 Flitterman-Lewis, Desire 71.
51 Instead of simply watching a narrative unfol d on a screen, the viewer of DulacÂ’s films Â“experiencesÂ” the film through the perspectives of the characters. Fr om her depiction of Mme BeudetÂ’s fantasy life and a reversed id ea of the object of desire, where the man becomes the object of desire as opposed to th e woman, to her visual interpretation of the clergymanÂ’s increasing insanity, Dulac illust rates the abstract st ruggles her characters face within their own subconscious minds. Through her cinematic techniquesÂ—point-of view shots from each characterÂ’s perspective, slow-motion action, attention to lighting, and the use of superimpositionsÂ—Dulac creates a visual harmony in he r films, while still creating a narrative structure which her viewer can follow. The viewer of DulacÂ’s films is no longer an outsider. Inst ead, the viewer is allowed to experience the film from the charactersÂ’ perspectives. Looking at DulacÂ’s films through the ex amination of the contemporary film theories of Mulvey, Silverman, Doane and de La uretis, it is interesting to see how both the male and female spectators relate differently to the characters. While the female characters serve as an object of sexual desire for the male viewer, they also appeal to the female viewer as well. While the female viewer can take on the Â“masculineÂ” position while watching the film, she can also identify with DulacÂ’s characters. She places both the character and the viewer into Â“a particul ar situationÂ…in order to penetrate into the secret domain of his inner lifeÂ’.Â”118 Despite the controversy surrounding La Coquille et le Clergyman and her close adaptation of ArtaudÂ’s script, Dulac makes the film her own through subtle changes in the interpretati on of the script by in stilling a sense of femininity into the film without destroying the scriptÂ’s masculine undertones or turning it 118 Abel 280.
52 into a strictly feminist interpretation. Dul ac keeps the woman as an object of desire, but never demoralizes her or makes her into a sexual Â“toyÂ” for male pleasure. The focus remains on the clergymanÂ’s attempt at understa nding his insanity and the woman merely provides another perspective to ga uge his insanity by. It is perhaps her ability to depict all aspects of human existence that makes he r one of the most influential female film directors in cinematic history.
53 Bibliography Primary Sources Artaud, Antonin, Victor Corti and Simone Sanzenbach. Â“Scenarios and Arguments.Â” The Tulane Drama Review 11.1 (Autumn 1966) 166-85. JSTOR University of South Florida, Tampa Lib. <07 July 2008 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1125280> La Coquille et le Clergyman Dir. Germaine Dulac. Perf. Alex Allin, Genica Athanasiou, Lucien Bataille. 1929. DVD. Kino Video, 2005. Secondary Sources Abel, Richard. French Cinema: The First Wave 1915-1929 Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. Adamowicz, Elza. Â“Bodies Cut and Di ssolved: Dada and Surrealist Film.Â” Gender and the French Cinema ed. Alex Hughes and James S. Williams. Oxford: Berg, 2001. 19-33. Auden, W. H. Â“Psychology and Art.Â” Sigmund Freud: Critical Assessments Vol. II: The Psychoanalysis of Culture. New York: Rutledge, 1989. Barber, Stephen. Artaud: The Screaming Body Creation Books, 1999. Barthes, Roland. Â“StripteaseÂ”. The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends 3rd ed. Ed. David H. Richter. Bo ston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007. 869-70. Benjamin, Jessica. Â“A Desire of On eÂ’s Own: Psychoanalytic Feminism and Intersubjective Space .Â” The Feminist Philosophy Reader Ed. Alison Bailey and Chris Cuomo. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. 188-204. Bychowski, Gustav. Â“From Catharsis to Work of Art: The Making of an Artist.Â” Psychoanalysis and Culture New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1951.
54 Carson, Dianne, Linda Dittmar, and Janice R. Welsh, Eds. Multiple Voices in Film Criticism Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. Caws, Mary Ann. Â“Seeing the Surrealist Woman.Â” Surrealism and Women Eds. Rudolf Keunzli and Gwen Raaberg. Ca mbridge: The MIT Press, 1991. 11-16. Chaudhuri Shonhini. Feminist Film Theorists: Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa de Laurentis, Barbara Creed New York: Routledge: 2006 Cook, Pam and Clair Johnston. Â“The Place of Woman in the Cinema of Raoul Walsh.Â” Issues in Feminist Film Criticism Ed. Patricia Erens. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. de Beauvoir, Simone. Â“Myths of Women in Five Authors.Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, 3rd ed Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007. 676-678. de Lauretis, Teresa. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987. Doane, Mary Ann. Â“Film and the Masquerade.Â” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. Ed. Sue Thornham. New York: New York University Press, 1999. 131-145. Dulac, Germaine. Â“Visual and Anti-Visual Films.Â” crits Sur le Cinma Paris: ditions Paris Exprimental, 1994. Erens, Patrica. Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. Fink, Bruce. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. Fisher, Andrea. Let us now Praise Famous Women: Women Photographers for the US Government 1935-1944. London: Pandora Press, 1987. Flitterman-Lewis Sandy. Â“The Image and th e Spark: Dulac and Artaud Reviewed.Â” Dada and Surrealist Film Rudolf E. Kuenzli, Ed. New York: Willis Locker and Owens, 1987. 110-127. ---. To Desire Differently: Feminism and the French Cinema New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
55 Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1961. ---. Civilization and Its Discontents Trans. James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1961. Gaines, Jane. Â“Women and Representation: Can we Enjoy Alternative Pleasure.Â” Issues in Feminist Film Criticism ed Patricia Erens. Bloo mington: Indiana University Press, 1990. 75-92. Gille, Vincent. Surrealism: Desire Unbound Eds. Jennifer Mundy and Dawn Ades. London: Tate Publishing, Ltd., 2001. Greene, Naomi. Â“Artaud and Film: A Reconsideration.Â” Cinema Journal 23.4 (1984): 28-40. Gould, Michael. Surrealism and the Cinema (open-eyed screening). Cranbury: A.S.Barnes and Co., Inc., 1976. Hammond, Paul. The Shadow and Its Shadow: Surrealist Writings on the Cinema. San Francisco: City Light Books, 2000. Heberle, Renee. Feminist Interpretati ons of Theodor Adorno University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006. Hedges, Inez. Â“Constellated Visions: Robert DesnosÂ’s and Man RayÂ’s LÂ’Etoile de Mer .Â” Dada and Surrealist Film Rudolf E. Kuenzli, Ed. New York: Willis Locker and Owens, 1987. 99-109. Irigraray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman Trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985. Kaplan, E. Ann. Feminism and Film Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. ---. Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera New York: Methuen, Inc., 1983. Krauss, Rosalind, Jane Li vingston, Dawn Ades. L'Amour fou : Photography and Surrealism. New York: Cross River Press, Ltd., 1985. Kuenzli, Rudolf E., Ed. Dada and Surrealist Film New York: Willis, Locker & Owens, 1987. Lacan, Jacques. crits Trans. Bruce Fink. New York : W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.. 2007.
56 Lee, Lisa Yun. Dialectics of the Body: Corporeality in the Philosophy of T. W. Adorno. New York: Routledge, 2005. LÂ’Etoile de Mer Dir. Man Ray. Perf. Kiki of Mont parnasse Andr de la Rivire, Robert Desnos 1928. DVD. Kino Video, 2005. Malt, Johanna. Obscure Objects of De sire: Surrealism, Fetishism, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Mulvey, Laura. Â“Visual Pleas ure and Narrative Cinema.Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. 3rd Ed. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007. 1172-80. Murphy, Richard. Theorizing the Avant-Garde: Mode rnism, Expressionism and the Problem of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Meyers, Diana Tiejens. Gender in the Mirror: Cultura l Imagery & WomanÂ’s Agency New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Penley, Constance. Â“The Lady DoesnÂ’t Va nish: Feminism and Film Theory.Â” Feminism and Film Theory. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc., 1988. Ray, Man. Self Portrait Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1963. Rich, B. Ruby. Â“In the Name of Feminist Film Criticism.Â” Multiple Voices in Film Criticism. Dianne Carson, Linda Dittmar, and Janice R. Welsh, Ed Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 27-47. Silverman, Kaja. Â“Lost Objects and Mistaken Subjects.Â” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. Sue Thornham, Ed. New York: New York University Press, 1999. 97107. Smith, Sharon. Â“The Image of Woman in Film: Some Suggestions for Future Research.Â” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. Ed. Sue Thornham. New York: New York University Press, 1999. 14-19. Stich, Sidra. Anxious Visions: Surrealist Art Berkeley: Univer sity Art Museum, 1990. Suleiman, Susan Rubin. The Female Body in Western Culture: Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986. Thornham, Sue. Feminist Film Theory: A Reader New York: New York University Press, 1999.
57 Van Wert, William. Â“Germaine Dulac: First Feminist Filmmaker.Â” Women and the Cinema: A Critical Anthology. Eds. Karyn Kay and Gerald Peary. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1977. Virmaux, Alain and Odette. Artaud/Dulac La Coquille et Le Clergyman: Essai DÂ’lucidation DÂ’une Querelle Mythique Trans. Tami Williams. Paris: ditions Paris Exprimental, 1999. Waldberg, Patrick. Surrealism London: Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1965. Williams, Alan. Republic of Images: A History of French Filmmaking Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. Williams, Linda. Figures of Desire: A Theory and Analysis of Surrealist Film. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981. Wood, Ghislaine. The Surreal Body: Fetish and Fashion London: V & A Publications, 2007. ÂŽiek, Slavoj. Â“Courtly Love or, Woman as Thing.Â” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. 3rd Ed. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford/St. MartinÂ’s, 2007. 1181-97.