Swirling :

Swirling :

Material Information

Swirling : an examination of time-to-degree, reasons, and outcomes associated with multi-institutional transfers
Brown, Alytrice Robinson
Place of Publication:
[Tampa, Fla]
University of South Florida
Publication Date:


Subjects / Keywords:
Blog Based Interviews
Blogs As A Research Tool
Reverse Transfer
Dissertations, Academic -- Educational leadership Educational Administration -- Doctoral -- USF ( lcsh )
bibliography ( marcgt )
non-fiction ( marcgt )


ABSTRACT: Swirling is an emergent transfer pattern among college students. Swirlers are students who may have participated in a combination of reverse transfer, lateral transfer, or traditional transfer patterns. The available research on swirling has been predominately quantitative in nature. This study was designed to obtain qualitative data on multi-institutional transfers from a qualitative perspective. A heuristic phenomenological approach grounded in the transformational learning theory method was used to obtain data. The data were obtained via an online blog-based interview. The interview revealed six themes in regards to why students swirl. This study also addressed time-to-degree and outcomes associated with students who swirl.
Disseration (Ed.D.)--University of South Florida, 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
System Details:
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
System Details:
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
General Note:
Title from PDF of title page.
General Note:
Document formatted into pages; contains 180 pages.
General Note:
Includes vita.
Statement of Responsibility:
by Alytrice Robinson Brown.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of South Florida Library
Holding Location:
University of South Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
E14-SFE0004867 ( USFLDC DOI )
e14.4867 ( USFLDC Handle )

Postcard Information



This item has the following downloads:

Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam 22 Ka 4500
controlfield tag 007 cr-bnu---uuuuu
008 s2011 flu ob 000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E14-SFE0004867
XX9999 (Online)
1 100
Brown, Alytrice Robinson.
0 245
Swirling :
h [electronic resource] /
b an examination of time-to-degree, reasons, and outcomes associated with multi-institutional transfers
by Alytrice Robinson Brown.
[Tampa, Fla] :
University of South Florida,
Title from PDF of title page.
Document formatted into pages; contains 180 pages.
Includes vita.
(Ed.D.)--University of South Florida, 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
Text (Electronic dissertation) in PDF format.
ABSTRACT: Swirling is an emergent transfer pattern among college students. Swirlers are students who may have participated in a combination of reverse transfer, lateral transfer, or traditional transfer patterns. The available research on swirling has been predominately quantitative in nature. This study was designed to obtain qualitative data on multi-institutional transfers from a qualitative perspective. A heuristic phenomenological approach grounded in the transformational learning theory method was used to obtain data. The data were obtained via an online blog-based interview. The interview revealed six themes in regards to why students swirl. This study also addressed time-to-degree and outcomes associated with students who swirl.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
Miller, Thomas .
Blog Based Interviews
Blogs As A Research Tool
Reverse Transfer
Dissertations, Academic
x Educational leadership Educational Administration
t USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
4 856
u http://digital.lib.usf.edu/?e14.4867


Swir ling: An Examination of Time to Degree, Reasons, and Outcomes Associated with Multi I nstitutional Transfers by Alytrice Robinson Brown A d issertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education Department of Adult, Career, and Higher Education College of Education University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Miller, Ed.D. Robert Sullins, Ed.D. Daphne Thomas, Ph.D. William Young, Ed.D. Date of Approval: March 8 2011 Keywords: Attrition, Retention, Reverse Transfer, Traditional Transfer, Blog Based Interviews Copyright 2011, Alytrice Robinson Brown


Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my wonderful family who supported me throughout this entire process: to my husband Darryl Brown, who provided an immeasurable amount of encouragement and was my primary supporter ; to my kids Ashyaa, Briona, and Darryl II, who left mommy alone and let her work; to my mother Christine Walton, who called almost every day to ask if I was finished yet; and to my sister Chalynda Preval, who lamented with me took pity on me, and s pent time with me when I needed a break, but made sure I resumed working in a timely manner Without your love and support this process would have been extremely difficult, if not impossible. Finally, to everyone who was not mentioned by name, but was instrumental to my success I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks!


Acknowledgments I would like to extend a special thanks to my diss ertation committee members: Dr. Thomas Miller always provided the proper guidance, encouragement, and motivation, which allowed me to rise like a ph oenix and keep pressing forward; Dr. Robe rt Sullins supported m e throughout the entire process by sharing his time and wisdom unselfishl y; Dr. Daphne Thomas helped me create a well rounded dissertation due to her overwhelming support and thought provoking questions ; while Dr. William Young encour aged me to embrace new ideas and think outside the box. As a committee you worked as a co hesive supportive network that strengthened me both mentally and academically, for that I will be eternally grateful. Many thanks to the University Regist r a r, Angela DeBose for your support with data collection and to Dr. Samue l L. Wright for being a mentor and leading by example I would also like to thank Dr. Mack Davis III and Dr. Melvin James for without your assistance as an undergraduate, it would not have been possible to pursue a doctorate.


i Table of Contents List of Figures ................................ ................................ ............. iv Abstract ................................ ................................ ..................... v Chapter One : Introduction ................................ ............................ 1 Statement of the Problem ................................ ..................... 1 Background of the Problem ................................ ................... 3 Purpose of the Study ................................ ........................... 8 Research Questions ................................ ............................. 9 Significance of the Study ................................ ..................... 10 Definition of Terms ................................ ............................. 11 Institution of Study ................................ ............................. 13 Limitations of the Study ................................ ...................... 15 Chapter Two : Literature Review ................................ .................... 18 Overview ................................ ................................ ........... 18 Traditional Transfer ................................ ............................ 19 Transfer Trends ................................ ................................ .. 20 Reverse t ransfer ................................ ........................ 21 Lateral t ransfer ................................ .......................... 23 Swirling ................................ ................................ .... 24 Possible Consequences ................................ ........................ 26 Sw irling credit t ransferability ................................ ....... 26 Dipping ................................ ................................ ..... 27 Time to D egree ................................ ......................... 28 Institutional ................................ ............................... 31 Characteristics of t ransf er s tudents ............................... 32 Ethnicity ................................ ................................ ... 32 Age ................................ ................................ ....... 33 Gender ................................ ................................ ..... 33 Socioeconomic s tatus ................................ .................. 34 Possible Reasons for Swirling ................................ ............... 35 Blog as a Research Tool ................................ ....................... 38


ii Chapter Three : Methods ................................ .............................. 44 Participants ................................ ................................ ....... 44 Instrument ................................ ................................ ........ 45 Research Questions ................................ ............................ 48 Data Collection Procedures ................................ .................. 49 Research Design ................................ ................................ 51 Summary ................................ ................................ .......... 62 Chapter Four : Research Findings ................................ ................... 64 Overview ................................ ................................ ........... 64 Online Blog ................................ ................................ ........ 65 Participants ................................ ................................ ....... 67 Interview A nalysis ................................ .............................. 70 Why Do Stude nts Swirl? Prevalent Themes .......................... 77 Search for p erspective ................................ ................ 78 Moved/Relocated ................................ ........................ 81 Aca demic i ssues ................................ ......................... 83 Completion ................................ ................................ 87 Financial d ifficulty ................................ ...................... 88 Health c oncerns ................................ ......................... 91 Theme o verview ................................ ......................... 95 Transcript Analysis ................................ ............................. 97 What is the Relationship Between Swirling and Time to Degree completion ? ................................ ........ 101 What Outcomes Are Associated With Students Who Participated in the Multiple Institutional Transfer Process ? ................................ ................................ ... 104 Summary ................................ ................................ ....... 113 Chapter Five : Discussion ................................ .............................. 117 Overview ................................ ................................ ........... 119 Conclusion ................................ ................................ ......... 120 Ethnicity ................................ ................................ ... 121 Age ................................ ................................ ....... 122 Gender ................................ ................................ ..... 122 Socioeconomic s tatus ................................ .................. 123 Characte ristics of blog p articipants ............................... 125 Themes ................................ ................................ .... 127 Transformation al l earning ................................ ............ 132 Implications and Recomme ndations for Future Research .......... 133 Summary ................................ ................................ .......... 141


iii References ................................ ................................ ............... 144 Appendic e s ................................ ................................ ............... 163 Appendix A: Blog B ased Interview Questions ......................... 164 App e ndix B: Participati on Letter ................................ ........... 165 Appendix C: Informed Consent ................................ ............. 166 Append i x D: Transcript Request Form ................................ ... 170 A ppendix E: Participant Email ................................ ............... 171 About the Author ................................ ............................... End Page


iv List of Figures Figure 1. Emergent T ransfer Patterns Between 2 year and 4 year Institutions ................................ .............................. 5


v Abstract Swirling is an emergent transfer pattern among college students. Swirlers are students who may have participated in a combination of reverse transfer, la teral transfer, or traditional transfer patterns. The available research on swirling has been predominately quantitative in nature. This study was designed to obtain qualitative data on multi institutional transfers from a qualitative perspective. A heuristic phenomenological approach grounded in the transformatio nal learning theory method was used to obtain data. The data were obtained via an online blog based interview. The interview revealed six themes in regards to why students s wirl. This study also addressed time to degree and outcomes associated with students who swirl.


1 Chapter One : Introduction Statement of the Problem In stitutions of higher learning hav e constantly undergone some form of change such a s adjustments in curriculum, shifts in funding, and transformations in student behavior. I n the realm of changes in student behaviors, researchers have reviewed patterns of attendance to check for new trends. In 1991, Ottinger defined the traditional atten dance pattern as a high school senior entering a four year university in the fall immediately after high school graduati on. According to Hearn (1992), the traditional college enrollment pattern in the United States has been eroding. Some consider the tradi tional college enrollment to be that of a native student. Native students enter college as first time freshman at four year institution s (Po rter, 1999); where they remain enrolled until they receive their bachelor's degree s without transferring to any othe r institutions. However, many students were found to have participated in the transfer process. Sullivan (2005) found that approximately one third of college seniors have transferred at some point in their academic


2 career s Townsend (1999) wrote that stud ent transfer could be considered a fact of life. The most commonly known pattern of transfer has been the traditional transfer. A traditional transfer student has typically attended a two year institution then matriculated to a four year institution to com plete a bachelor's degree program. Kozeracki (2001) noted that thousands of students transfer from community college s to four year institution s each year. Other researchers have concurred that the traditional transfer has become more common since community college serves as the main point of entry into higher education for many students (Cejda, 1999; Wellman, 2002). Subsequently, researchers have discovered an increase in more complex enrollment patterns in transfer student behavior (Corrigan, 2003). The e mergent new patterns are comprised of reverse transferring, lateral transferring, and swirling (Corrigan, 2003; de los Santos & Wright, 1990). A reverse transfer is defined as students attending four year institution s then transferring to two year institu tion (Palmer, 2003). Lateral transferring is considered to have occurr ed when students transfer from two year institution s to other two year institution s, or from four year institution s to other four year


3 institution s (Palmer, 2003). However, participation in the lateral transfer process does not provide any upward or reverse mobility. One of the most popular emergent trends is swirling. Swirling is defined as attending three or more institutions prior to c ompleting a bachelor's degree (d e los Santos & Wright, 1990). Swirling emerged in the late 1980's, but was not considered prevalent at that time. Adelman (1988) found evidence of swirling while rev iewing student s transcripts; and noted that dozens of students had attended three or four institutions pr ior to graduation. Today, swirling is considered a new phenomenon. Researchers have conducted studies in an effort to uncover the reasons for the increased occurrence of swirling and why swirling has become more attractive for some students than the tradit ional pattern of transfer (Welsh & Kjorlien, 2001; McCormick, 2003). Background of the Problem A review of the transfer patterns throughout the United States illustrated a shift from the traditional two year to four year trans ition (Phelan, 1999). The shi ft revealed several additional patterns of enrollment (Figure 1). Reverse transferring describes an emergent pattern where students attending four year institutions transfer to two year institutions instead of alternate four year institutions


4 (Townsend & D ever, 1999). In 1999, Townsend found that the community college was being used not only as a stepping stone on a student's way to a four year institution, but the community college had also become a point of re entry for students coming from a four year in stitution. In addition to the traditional and reverse transfer, college students have also participated in lateral transfers. Lateral transfers occur when students move among institutions on the same level, neither participating in a vertical transfer nor a reverse transfer. It is considered a horizontal transfer to move from a two year to another two year, or from one four year to another four year. T he aforementioned transfer patterns have evolved into two additional patterns, swirling and dipping. Swir ling, the process in which college students attend more than two post secondary institutions, can consist of several combined transfer patterns (de los Santos & Wright, 1990). A student swirls when he/she engages in multiple instances of transfer: traditio nal, reverse or lateral transfers. Dipping is defined as the process of a student staying continuously enrolled at one institution, while taking courses at another institution For the purposes of this study, dippers will not be separated from their main category. For example, if the student was a


5 native student and a dipper, he/she will remain in the native student classification. 2 year 2 year Cross Enrollment 4 year 4 year Figure 1. Emergent Transfer Patterns Between 2 year and 4 year Institutions. An illustration of current transfer patterns: Traditional Transfers, Reverse Transfer and Lateral Transfer. Swirling denotes participation in 2 or more transfer patterns. The research av ailable on transfer students is abundant. T he research on swirling and dipping, although it is scant, has increased in recent years. An initial search for transfer and articulation revealed a variety of results over a spectrum of topics. In contrast, a search conduct ed for the term "dipping" yiel ded only two applicable results. Moreover, a search in the Educational Research Information Center (ERIC) database, between the summer and fall of 2009, using the keyword "swirling" returned several results. Only two of those results dealt w ith the phenome non of swirling in higher education. Further, a search using the terms "reverse transfer" and "higher education" resulted in a wealth of research articles. The term "reverse transfer" Lateral Transfer Traditional Transfer Lateral Transfer Lateral Transfer Lateral Transfer Reverse Transfer


6 yielded more information because this area has been studie d more intense ly than swirling Finally a search using a combination of "swirling" and "reverse transfer" uncovered four additional resources, but the results did not provide a significant increase in the amount of information available. Due to the lack of research on the topic of swirling, the majority of the information obtained was on the transfer process, reverse transfer, and emergent trends in college attendance. Bach, Banks, Blanchard, Kinnick Ricks, & Stoering (1999 a ) found approximately two out of five baccalaureate degree students re turned to commu nity college to improve skills, to accumulate credits for alternate employment training, to engage in vocational training, or pursue personal interest. Counting the Reverse Trans fer Student (1985), an article compiled for ERIC Digests, researchers concluded that academic problems at a four year institution contributed to students leaving their university to enroll in community college. Transfer studies have been conducted using b oth quantitative and qualitative methods, but the overwhelming majori ty use quantitative data that are either pre existing or obtained via survey by th e researcher (Kozeracki, 2001). The most recent studies on the transfer process and swirling were quantit ative in nature and based on


7 pre existing institutional, High School & Beyond/Sophomore (HS&B /So) cohort or National Education Longitudinal Study ( N E LS ) data (Adelman, 2006; Goldrick Rab & Pfeffer 2009) In an effort to provide an overall picture of the swirling phenomenon, this study plans to utilize qualitative methods. The use of qualitative methods will add to the body of knowledge on swirling by collecting data in the voices of the subjects Indeed, the researcher expect ed to discover that swirlers h ave longer degree completion times in relation to native and traditional transfer students. According to McCormick (2003), students who attended two or more institutions experienced longer degree completion times. Students who transferred to new institutio ns may have experienced new or additional graduation requirements or lost course credit upon transfer (McCormick, 2003). The reason for this result, if in fact this is a result of this study, may not have a definitive explanation at all. Extensive research was conducted on the subject of student transfer to uncover any possible trends. Due to the limited quantit y of research, few studies reveal why students participate in multiple institution transfer. The majority of research on swirling which attempts to provide reasons for student transfer relies on historical


8 information such as transfer records not qualitative information provided by the students themselves (Longanecker & Blanco, 2003; Zamani, 2001). Purpose of the Study Although scholars have ide ntified swirling, there has not been extensive research conducted in the area. Nearly 60% of students who enrolled in undergraduate education attended more than one institution (Adelman, 2006). Because of the number of students who have actually participat ed in swirling, the phenomenon needs t o be addressed and researched (d e los Santos & Wright, 1990; Rab, 2004). Therefore, additional research is required to seek answers to several questions that may determine the reasons for swirling, and why it is increa singly prevalent. Participation in swirling has increased. Therefore it seems useful to understand its origins and characteristics. This was especially true since acco untability has been defined by the measure of graduation rates (McCormick, 2003). The inc rease in research pertaining to swirling over the last few years has illustrated the need for researchers to address the phenomenon of swirling in an effort to uncover trends within this emergent pattern of attendance (Kearney, Townsend,


9 Kearne y, 1995; Bac h, Banks, Kinnick, R icks, Stoering, & Walleri, 2000; Yang, Brown, & Br own, 2008). T he purpose of this study was to collect descriptive data to ascertain why students swirl and whether the process of swirling extends time to degree completion. The informat ion collected provide d a description of the students who participate d in the swirling process. The transcript e valuation and the interview allow ed the researcher to provide a detailed description of the swirling population based on age, race, gender, and s ocioeconomic status. Another purpose of this study wa s to expand the body of knowledge on swirling, not by replication, but through unique research. The researcher investigate d swirling using information obtained from students who have actually participate d in t he swirling process. This study also a ttempt ed to identify any trends or outcomes associated with swirling that may require examination. Research Questions This qualitative study examine d multiple institutional transfers from the swirling student's perspective. The researcher uncover ed several common characteristics or outcomes associated with swirling, utilizing the following questions: 1) Why do students swirl ?


10 2) What is the relationship bet ween swirling and time to degree completion ? 3) What outcomes are associated with students who participated in multiple institutional transfer process? Significance of the Study This study sought to identify the reasons students participate d in swirling. The information obtained reveal ed the reasons students engage d in swirling and the potential impact on colleges and univers ities in policy making The results may assist institutions with increasing rete ntion rates and encourag e the creation of articulation a greements. Articulation agreements create an understanding between two institutions or between a group of institutions and the state pertaining to acceptable transfer credit from one institution to the other. Articulation agreements simplify the transfer process and ease the transition from one institution to another for those students who participate in the growing trend. If institutions do not participate in articulation agreements, or have fewer agreements in place, transfer students may experience a sm aller number of acceptable c redit hours (Bach et al., 1999). Some states have articulation agreements that


11 create a common course numbering system, which allow students to transfer credits between institutions without difficulty. Definition of Terms Florida Common Course Numbering System. The Common Course Numbering System consists of courses that have the same academic content taught by faculty with comparable credentials. The courses share the same prefix and number and are considered equivalent cou rses (Statewide Postsecondary Articulation Manual, 2007). Cross enrollment. Cross enrollment is defined as concurrent attendance at two or more institutions of higher education (Adelman, 1999). Dipping. Dipping describes the process of students remaining c ontinuously enrolled at one institution, while taking courses at another institution (i.e., cross enrollment) (McCormick, 2003) Lateral t ransfer. Lateral transfer students move between colleges or universities at the same degree track level (Boughan, 2002 ). Multi institutional transfers. Multi institutional transfers are students who complete the transfer process and attend multiple institutions of higher education (Kearney et al, 1995).


12 Native s tudent. A native student is one who remained enrolled in the same institution of higher education from his/her freshman year to graduation without transferring to any other institutions ( Kearney, Townsend, & Kearney, 199 5) Reverse transfer. The reverse transfer process, the opposite of the traditional transfer, is transfer from a four year institution to a two year institution (Townsend & Dever, 1999). Senior i nstitution. A senior institution in higher education is one that offers bachelor's degrees and encompasses all undergraduate levels of academics for four years, typically a four year college or university (Boughan, 2002). Swirling. Swirling is the process of students transferring to two or more institutions, thereby attending a minimum of three institutions of higher education, prior to completing their bachelor's degree (d e los Santos & Wright, 1990) Temporary t ransfer. A temporary transfer student is a hybrid betwee n a dipper and a transfer student. These students attend a state university other than their home institution s in the summer in an effort to meet a Florida requirement that they enroll in nine summer hours at a state university.


13 Traditional transfer. Trad itional transfer is defined as making the transition from a community college to a four year university in an effort to obtain a bachelor's degree (Bers, 2001). Transfer student. This term includes all of the various types of transfer students: traditiona l transfer, lateral transfer and reverse transfer student (Kearney, Townsend, & Kearney, 1995; LeBard 1999; McCormick, 2003) Transient student. Transient students are student s who take courses at institutions other than t heir home institutions, not as de gree seeking student s but to transfer the credits earned back t o their home institutions. These students are considered temporary transfer s for this study (McCormick, 2003) Institution of Study Research was conducted at the University of South Florida, which was established in 1956 in Tampa, Florida. The U niversity now include s campus es in Sarasota, Lakeland, and St. Petersburg. Like the University of South Florida System the USF St. Petersburg campus is in dependently accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, thereby creating the USF university system (USF System Facts 2009 10, 2009). T he main campus of the Universit y of South Florida (USF) is in Tampa, Flo rida.


14 Tampa is a major metropolitan area in the southeast region of the United States of America. USF is the 9 th largest university in the nation, and the third largest universit y in the state of Florida. The U niversity is ranked second in total research dollars received among Florida's 11 public universities. The Carnegie Commission on Higher Education classifies USF as a RU/VH: Research Universities (very high research activity) which signifies that the institution awards at least 20 doctoral degrees pe r year. USF offers a wide variety of baccalaureate programs and awards a minimum of 50 doctoral degrees in 15 or more disciplines. According to the USF System Facts 2009 10 (2009), the University of South Florida has approximately 47,122 students. Of the 3 5,951 undergraduates, 4,926 students are transfer students who enrolled for the Fall 2009 semester. Approximately, 3,138 students transferred from one of Florida's 29 public community colleges, with the majority of those students transferring from Hillsbor ough Community College. There were also 228 students who transferred from a Florida four year institution. Less that 200 of the tra nsfer students were from out of state institutions. The high number of transfer students could be attributed to several facto rs. One factor is that USF is a transfer friendly institution


15 with a high level of commitment to assisting transfer students. Therefore, the institution is open to accepting incoming transfer students. Another factor is that t he s tate of Florida has severa l articulation agreements, with both publ ic and private institutions, as well as a common course numbering system. The articulation agreements and common course number system facilitates transfer among ins t itutions of higher education within the s tate of Florida Although the majority of the students who transfer are from within the state of Florida, the student body includes students who have traveled from all 50 states and 107 different countries. The USF student body is comprised of White (64%), Bl ack (11%), Hispanic (13%), Asian (6%), American Indian and International (2%) students while the remaining students classified themselves Other. The gender breakdown for USF is 42% male and 58% female (USF System Facts 2009 10, 2009). Limitations of the S tudy There wer e two deliberate limitations of this study based on the selec tion of participants. T o be selected for the interview, the participants h ad to be college seniors who ha d submitted a graduation application for the f all 2010 semester. The study group was further limited to participants in the swirling process. The selected students


16 participated in the swirling process by attending three or more institutions throughout their collegiate experience. The researcher wa s aware that factors other tha n causal linkages may have influence d relationships. The researcher, aware of this tenet, took caution when interpreting the results, especially i f a causal relationship wa s suspected. For example, if the results disclose d that swirlers possess longer degree completion times than nati ve students, the researcher experience d difficulty in distinguishing any additional, external variables that may have potentially contributed to this finding (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). Age a nd memory recall may have be en additional limitations of this study. Because the interviews occurred online via blog, the method of data collection may have discourage d participants over a certain age from volunteering. Traditional college aged students we re more likely to participate than students over the age of 30. The students who choose to participate may have encounter ed issues with memory recall. The questions regarding the transfer experiences of the participants compel led the students to recount hi storical information for a very specific time frame. As a result, the recalled data may not have be en fresh and thereby pose d a limitation for the study.


17 The remaining chapters provide additional information on swirling an d transferring. Chapter Two addre ss es the literature associated with traditional transfer, transfer trends, possible consequences of swirling, characteristics of swirlers, possible reasons for swirling and a review of the most current research on swirling. Chapter Three discuss es the met hodology, research design, and methods of data analysis.


18 Chapter Two : Literature Review Overview In 1902, Joliet Junior College became the first two year college in the United States (Cohen & Brawer, 1996). Junior colleges evolved into community colleges that were created to meet certain needs and therefore were charged to provide five major functions. The five functions of the community college are academic transfer, occupational education (v ocational technical), continuing education, remedial/developmental/compensatory/pre collegiate education, and community services (Cohen & Brawer, 1996). The first of these functions, academic transfer; will be the basis of this study. Transfer, as defined by Adelman (2005), is considered "a permanent change of venue, a migration that is formally recognized by system rules" (p. XV). Adelman (2005) also stated that nearly 60% of traditional age undergraduates attend more than one institution. Perhaps student s transfer because America has created one of the most transfer friendly systems in the world (Sullivan, 2005). Berkner, He, Mason, & Wheeless (2007) found that over 40% of students who


19 enrolled in higher education in 2003 h ad transferred without earning d egree s by 2006. Furthermore, Day (2005) testified to the US House of Representatives that 71% of community college entrants intended to earn a bachelor's degree, which implied that the students were contemplating at least one transfer to complete their deg ree. Traditional Transfer Community c olleges are charged with the responsibility of the transfer function. Transfer serves an important function because it allows community college to become a point of entry into higher education for students unable to at tend four year college s as freshme n (Cohen, 2003). According to Cejda (1999), community college serves as the entry point to higher education for many students. Townsend (1999) found that student transfer is a fact of life and Okun, Karoly, Martin, & Bens loff (2009) referred to the transfer process as a prevalent and important form of institutional departure. Students who enroll in two year colleges have an opportunity to take both developmental and introductory level courses, and articulate those courses to a four year college (Hillman, Lum, & Hossler, 2008). As a result, four year colleges and universities have beco me increasing ly interested in the transfer process, as well as the type of transfers that


20 occurred between institutions of higher education (K ozeracki, 2001; Townsend & Dever, 1999). The traditional transfer involved students who transferred from the community college, with or without completing an associate's degree, to a four year college or university in an effort to complete their bachelor d egr ee programs (Cejda, 1999). Bach et al. (2000) found considerable evidence that the traditional two year to four year transfer pattern is not as normative as in the past. Although this has remained a dominant pattern in transfer student behavior, over th e last decade, several other trends in transfer patterns have emerged (LeBard, 1999). Some of these trends will be discussed in the subsequent section. Transfer Trends The emergence of non traditional tran sfer patterns found in research date as far back as the 1970's (Sima, Inman, & Stein, 2003). Although non traditional patterns of attendance have been around for nearly 40 years, they have become more prevalent in recent years thereby becoming the norm (Longanecker & Blanco, 2003). Ma xwell, Hagendorn, Brocato, Moon, and Perrakis (2001) found that almost half of the students enrolled in a large urban area participated in alternate patterns of enrollment. The three non traditional patterns, or alternate


21 trends to the traditional transfer were reverse transfers, lateral transfers and swirling (Townsend & Dever, 1999). Palmer (2003) also found that student transfer took place in the same aforementioned forms. How ever, Maxwell et al. (2001) included simultaneous enrollment or dipping as an alternate pattern used by students in higher education. Rever se t ransfer. While some students follow a traditiona l pattern of enrollment and go straight from a two year to a four year. One study found that reverse transfe r student enrollment ranged from 3% to 65% of total student enrollment based on institutional estimates (Hillman, Lum, & Hossler, 2008). Reverse transfer was the term used to describe students who had attended a four year college but had transferred to a two year college instead of followin g the traditional method (Townsend & Dever, 1999). Reverse transfers have existed in some form since 1950, but increased in the 1990's (Townsend & Dever, 1999; Phelan, 1999). Research conducted by the City Colleges of Chicago found that one quarter of stud ents enrolled in City Colleges of Chicago were transfer students. Of those students, 71% of them were reverse transfer students. Colagross and Holland (2001) discovered that 86% of reverse transfer students surveyed were white, while 62% were female, and t he average age was 30.25.


22 Researchers have found several reasons for reverse transfer. In 1999, Hagendorn and Castro identified quite a few reasons students participated in reverse transfer, such as extra credit in the summer, em otional reasons, financial difficulty and academic issues. They also found that four year students took extra credits during the summer at community college to receive credits at a reduced rate and expedite graduation. The emotional reason encompassed immaturity, homesickness, and the irresponsible use of substanc es. Johnson (2006) also described emotions as a reason for reverse transfer. Students reported that they felt more comfortable at the community college than at the four year institution and that they had fewer issues adjus ting and less homesickness. However, financial problems also represented a majority of reasons for reverse transfer since community colleges are often less expensive than four year institutions. Tuition and fees at the commun ity college level are usually l ower than a four year institution (Hagendorn & Castro, 1999; Johnson, 2006). Although financial issues may have been an important factor for some students, others required educational refresher training. Johnson (2006) found that remediation was an importa nt reason for reverse transfer. Some students required special courses or


23 reduced class sizes to be able to progress adequately. Townsend and Dever (1999) surmised that reverse transfer students attended a community college due to academic difficulty at a four year institution and the effort gave the student a second opportunity at college. Yang, Brown, and Brown (2008) wrote that the inability of students to keep up with the academic pace at a four year university contributed to reverse transfer. This pos ition is supported by information released by Florida Atlantic University's Office of Institutional Effect iveness and Analysis (1999), which found that 70% of reverse transfer students left Florida Atlantic University with grade point averages below a 2.0. Academic reasons for reverse transferring were often intertwined with the emotional aspect of leaving since students may have transferred prior to leaving in disgrace or defeat (Hagendorn & C astro, 1999). Bach et al. (1999a ) further concluded that swirling may have also manifested in the form of reverse transferring, since few students actually participated in reverse transfer as a single incident; instead most of these students have had multiple transfers between institutions. Lateral t ransf er. Lateral transfer refers to students who transferred from one 2 year institution to another 2 year institution or from one 4 year institution to another 4 year institution (Townsend &


24 Dever, 1999). Bahr (2009) found that lateral transfers were more prev alent among men, younger students and Caucasian students when compared to their counterparts. According to Bahr (2009), lateral transfer was remarkably common among community college students, but serial or multiple lateral transfers were not common. Seria l transfers can be considered a form of swirling. Swirling. Swirling is the term u sed to describe the process of transferring to two or more institutions. Townsend and Dever (1999) concluded that swirling was when students, subject to life events, "move fr om school to school like leaves twisting in the wind" (p.5). Kearney, et al. (1995) identified four possible pathways for swirling. Students participated in swirling by transferring (a) from a four year to a two year institution and then back to a four yea r institution, (b) from a two year college to a two year college then to a four year college, (c) from a four year institution to a four year institution to yet another four year college, and (d) from a two year college to a four year college and then to a nother four year institution. Mul tiple institutional transfers a re not necessarily a new concept. Madonna (1976) created a student flow system, which allowed college administrators to calculate information on a framework of input s and outputs from college s or centers for a given student, which showed


25 that even in 1976 students were attending m ultiple institutions. In 1990, d e Los Santos and Wright also discussed student attendance at multiple institutions. Tow nsend (1999) found that both policy makers and the general public have a limited awareness of swirlers. Moreover, in recent years, multiple transfers and swirling has once again emerged as a trend with increasing popularity. Peter and Cataldi (2005) confirmed that 40% of students who entered higher edu cation for the first time in 1995 96 had attended more than one institution by 2001, thereby demonstrating that attending more than one post secondary institution during the course of undergraduate enrollment was a common practice. According to Adelman (19 99) the National Lo ngitudinal Survey from 1972 1984 ( NLS 72 ) data showed that 9.9% of the students attended two or more institutions whereas the High School & Beyond/Sophomore (HS & B/So 1982 1993) data showed 1 9.5% of the students attending two or more in stitutions. When Adelman revisited his study in 2006, he found that 35% of the students in the study attended two or more institutions. McCormick's (2003) research revealed that almost 50% of new college entrants in 1989 1990 who started at a four year in stitution enrolled at two or more institutions within five years with 15% having attended at least three institutions. Similarly, Peter and Cataldi (2005)


26 found that 59% of college freshman from 1999 2000 had attended more than one institution, while 47% o f them who started at a 4 year institution attended another institution with or without transferring. Cardenas (2007) confirmed that nearly half of the students at Portland State University had attended two or more institutions, while 17% had attended four or more. However, these multiple transfer trends ma y have been embarked upon by student s without the contemplation of potential consequences. Possible Consequences Current transfer trends have often led to unanticipated consequences. Unfortunately, swirling and other transfer behaviors a re negatively associated with degree completion. A student i s less likely to graduate the more they engage in the transfer process (Pascarella, 1985). The delay in time to d egree attainment may have been related to credit transferability. Swirling credit transferability. The new transfer trends retain the same problems or consequences associated with the traditional transfer process. One of the problems associated with transf er, included in both the traditi onal process and new trends, is credit transferability (Bach, Banks, Kinnick, Ricks, Stoering, & Walleri, 1999 b ). Students who participate in the traditional transfer process


27 may have accumulated credits that a re not transfe rable to their new institutions (Bach Banks, Kinnick, Ricks, Stoering, & Walleri 2000). They found that approximately 85% of the students who transferred had some credits that were not accepted. A transcript analysis conducted by the Oregon University Sy stem (2000) further illustrated that when students transferred from area community colleges to universities only 83% of their credits were accepted. Credit acceptance i s especially important for students wh o participate in the swirling phenomenon because they transferred to several institutions and may lose more credits than the traditional transfer students who transferred only once. In a study on attendance patterns by Bach et al. (1999 b ), students rendered some of the ir credits non transferab le based on two conclusions: complications arose in the transfer credit evaluation process for students who att ended multiple institutions or if students remained enrolled in higher education for an extended period of time they may have experienced multiple changes in programs or majors. Dipping. Another category similar to swirling i s dipping. For the purposes of this study, dippers are native students, who remain continuously enrolled at one home institution, but take courses at a number of other institutions. Bach et al. (1999a ) found that one third


28 of the students in their study used the community college to supplement their university coursework. Courses taken at other institutions were taken for the sole purpose of transferring the credit hours back to students' home institutions, which may not have had any consequences, such as credit loss, because they remained enrolled in the same program at the same institution (McCormick, 2003). In addition, many home institutions required students to complete paperwork for course approval prior to students enrolling in courses not taken at that institution, thereby ensuring that the credit hours would transfer and count towards their degrees. Peter and Cataldi (2005) confirmed that dipping has a positive relation to persistence and degree attainment. Time to D egree. Discussion of credit evaluation led researchers to address the time to degree completion for students who participated in the swirling process. Research conducted by Bach et al. (1999 b ) supported the notion that swirlers actually did complete the bachelor degrees that they were seeking. Adelman (1999) reviewed graduation rates from research conducted on institutional patterns that can be used to further support this conclusion. Ke arney and Townsend (1991) pointed out that multiple transfer students are persisters, meaning that swirlers consistently work toward degree completion.


29 On the other hand, according to Adelman (1999) 66% of traditional transfers earned bachelor's degrees, while 52% of swirlers and dippers earned bachelor's degrees. The persistence and degree completion of swirlers was attributed to those students often having to complete a minimum number of credits to graduate from the degree granting institution (Kearney, Townsend, Kearney; 1995). Peter and Cataldi (2005) explained that multiple institution attendance was negatively related to time to degree potentially due to credit transferability. The research has yielded some disagreement about whether transfe r and mult iple transfer contributed to a delay in time to degree completion. Barton (1997) found that approximately half of the students who entered college in 1989 had attained a bachelor's degree in six years regardless of their collegiate start at a two year or f our year institution. Cohen (2003) also found that by graduation, the time to degree and grade point average of transfer students were approximately the same as native students. Some research has determined that persistence i s an important factor in degre e completion. Gao, Hughes, O'Rear, and Fendley (2002) found that transfer students overall had a significantly higher graduation rate than native students in four years. Laanan (2001)


30 further showed that the persistence rate of transfers was similar to the persistence rates of native students. In terms of persistence, Gao et al. (2002) also discovered that at the six year graduation period, native students had a higher graduation rate than the transfer student group overall. Similarly, McCormick (1999) fou nd that those students who attended two or more institutions actually took longer to complete their degrees. In 2003, McCormick revisited this study and found similar results which showed native students, even those who dipped, graduated at higher rates th an swirlers. Upon further investigation of th eir research, Bach et al. (1999b ) also confirmed that some reverse and multiple transfer students complete baccalaureate d egrees in six years, however many of these students took more than seven years to complet e a B.A. or B.S. degree. Townsend (2001) found that although some community college students in associate of a rts degree programs with plans to attain a bachelor's degree, graduated with that degree at the same rate as native students. Nevertheless, time to degree for swirlers was still longer than that of native students (Townsend, 2001). Bers et al (2001) proposed that students who attended part time or stop ped out may have experienced a delay in time to degree Peter and Cataldi


31 (2005) foun d that, given enough time, students who attended more than one institution may ultimately earn degrees. Additional research revealed that although swirlers may take longer to attain a degree due to stop out or part time attendance, many swirlers earned their int ended degrees and even continue d on to graduate school (Cope & Hannah, 1975). Rab (2004) also found that swirling did affect time to degree and that the swirling attendance path has a negative impact on degree completion. Rab (2004) further showed that th e odds of completing a bachelor' s degree are significantly lower for swirlers than for native student s However, Rab (2004) did extend the notion that other factors could simultaneously cause swirling, decrease dropout, and impact time to degree completion Institutional. Trends of transfer have shifted from the normalcy of the traditional transfer from community college to university to the ability to attend as many institutions as they desired (Kearney, Townsend, & Kearney, 1995). As a result, many co lleges and universities across the nation were being affected by a phenomenon that occurred in a small portion of the population for quite some time (Adelman, 1988). The phenomenon of swirling or multi institutional transfer has caused many problems for co mmunity colleges and


32 universities alike. Schools had few choices when it came to transfer students including to : 1) not allow students with the intent to transfer admission into the school, 2) assist the student in the transfer process, or 3) attempt to pr event transfer by working to retain the student (Okun, et al, 2009). According to the University of Wisconsin's Committee on the Transfer Student Experience (2004), the institution was experiencing difficulty retaining transfer students. The Committee fou nd that transfer students persisted and graduated at lower rates than native students. Post secondary institutions were facing issues pertaining to accountability and financing, due to students' mobile transfer patterns (McCormick, 2003). Since colleges an d universities often use graduation rates and retention as indicators of institution performan ce, it is imperative to find more information on swirling (Gao et al. 2002). Higher education needs to obtain a better understanding of why students choose to pa rticipate in this pattern of behavior, thereby uncovering a need for additional research. Characteristics of Transfer Students Ethnicity. With the ultimate goal of transfer students to attain a bachelor's degree in the context of swirl ers experiencing poss ible consequences as a result of swirl ing, two questions remain: (a) w ho


33 swirls and (b) w hy do students swirl? According to some research, minority students were less likely to transfer than other students (Lee & Frank, 1990; Gao et al. 2002). Day (2005) stated that the transfer rate was approximately 20 25%, but the transfer rate of minorities were 10 20% lower than their white counterparts. This was supported by the examination of Kearney et al.'s (1995) examination of the ethnicity o f swirlers, where it was found that 64% were White, followed by 14% who were African American and 13% were Asian. Additional research indicated that Asian American students were more likely to swirl than other minorities, especially African Americans, who tended to prefer the traditional transfer process (LeBard, 1999). However, other research found that African American males were more likely to transfer than any other group (Pascarella, 1985). Age. There was also conflicting information concerning which age group swirls the most. Kearney et al. (1995) who found that 57% of the 420 students who swirled fell in the 18 22 year old age range and 29% of the 420 swirlers were 23 28 years old. A finding slightly different from the aforem entioned results showed t hat 36% of the 22 30 year old students participated in swirling (LeBard 1999) Gender. The research of Kearney et al. (1995) also showed that 53% of the 420 students in their study who had participated in swirling


34 were men and 47% of the students were wom en. This study supported the research by Lee & Frank (1990) which also found that women were less likely to transfer than men. However, Bach et al. (1999 a ) argued that women were more mobile than men and that women also took longer to graduate th an their m ale counterparts. Barton (1997) did not indicate who would be more likely to transfer, but the study did reveal that females were more likely to persist through graduation than males. Rab (2004) found that women were less likely to swirl than men. However, when Rab revisited this study in 2006 the result was that women were more likely to participate in transfer process than men. It was also shown that non Black men from lower socioeconomic backgrounds were disproportionately more likely to swirl (Rab, 2004 ). This research brought race, gender, and socioeconomic factors to the forefront as realistic characteristics of swirlers. Socioeconomic s tatus. Goldrick Rab and Pfeffer (2009) found several social background characteristics associated with socioeconomic status and transfer patterns. Two prevailing characteristics are parental education and family income. Parental education has an important impact since students whose parents attended college are thought to have more access to information and financial re sources that allow them to travel the traditional pathway


35 through college. Social class and family background may affect college attendance through the introduction of opportunities for, as well as barriers to college (Goldrick Rab, 2006). Students from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds were found to engage in traditional transfer and rever se transfer attendance patterns, primarily because lower SES students were more likely to enter higher education at the community college level and then tran sfer to a four year institution (Goldrick Rab, 2006). That study also found that of the students who started at a four year institution, 5% were from a lower SES while 41% were from a high SES. Moreover, students whose parents had a bachelor's degree, plus additional education, participated in reverse transfer less often than students whose parents did not complete high school but participated in lateral four year to four year transfer more often (Goldrick Rab & Pfeffer, 2009). Goldrick Rab (2006) surmised that access to information was significant in shaping college attendance, yet financial resources may have more bearing on postsecondary pathways. Possible Reasons for Swirling Most studies that addressed swirling were conducted using transcript analysis or a national database analysis. Such studies did not actually contact the students to uncover why they swirled. There


36 were however, several studies that speculated on why students swirl. For example, Adelman (2003) stated that long distance moves were typ ically job related, while short distance moves were usually housing related. Several other researchers also had theories about why students transferred among institutions of higher education. In 1975, Cope and Hannah used survey data collected by a regis trar's office to create four reasons why students transfer: 1) to reassess goals, 2) to cope with changes beyond the students control like family illness, 3) to follow a loved one and 4) to take time out to experience life. According to the researchers, t hose transfers reflected positive changes for the students. The other areas that were suggested by researchers were financial, academic, personal, and other reasons (Bowen & Bok, 1998; Cope & Hannah, 1975). The research essentially divided the literature on the reasons for transfer, including swirling, into two categories forced and voluntary reasons. Research showed that students participated in the reverse transfer process for either of two reasons: forced participation or voluntary participation (Phelan 1999; Townsend & Dever, 1999). Since some of these students who participated in reverse transfer


37 eventually transferred back to a four year institution to obtain a bachelor's degree, they eventually became swirlers. Forced participation consists of many components. One possible reason i s that the student experienced academic difficulty at his/her current institution ; therefore the student who wished to continue his/her education was forced to transfer to another institution (Cope & Hannah, 1975; Hagedorn & C astro, 1999). Bach et al. (1999a ) found that two out of five students experienced academic difficulty in a university setting. Townsend and Dever (1999) found that students who experienced academic difficulty at their four year institutions imp roved their grades during their attendance at community college and had improved results in grades when they returned to a four year institution. Voluntary participation occurs when students leave on their own accord not because they were in danger of be ing asked to leave. An example of voluntarily participation was when a student chose to leave his/her current institution for financial reasons ( DesJardins et al., 2002; Whiteside & Mentz, 2003). Some students left in an effort to find more affordable tuit ion (Bailey, 2003 and Phelan, 1999). The need for affordable tuition explained the increase in reverse transfers, since


38 most students chose to attend community college for a reduction in tuition costs (Townsend & Wilson, 2009). According to research condu cted by Hagedorn & Castro (1999) students left due to emotional reasons like homesickness. Students also transferred due to course availability, dissatisfaction with the institution, and smaller classes in a close knit atmosphere (Bailey, 2003; Cope & Hann ah, 1975; and Hagedorn & Castro, 1999). Fenollar, Roman, and Cuestas (2007) found that academic performance decreased when class size increased. Cope & Hannah (1975) found that students who left voluntarily had higher grades than students who remained enro lled and persisted to graduation, thereby indicating that voluntary transfers were not related to grade point average like forced transfers. Perhaps some of these reasons found for reverse transfer will hold true for swirling and will provide a glimpse int o why students swirl. Blog as a Research Tool The Internet has come a long way "F rom it's humble beginnings as a communication tool exclusively for university professors and scientists, the Internet has become a standard resource for college students, businesses, and anyone else who has access to a computer with a modem (Merriam, 2009, p. 15)." Rainie (2010) found that 76%


39 of the North American population utilizes the Internet. This percentage illustrates a 140% growth rate over the last nine years. Networking sites like Facebook have also shown an increase in Internet usage. Four mal e students created Facebook in 2004 in a Harvard dorm room. Facebook now has over 400 million users who spend more than 500 billion minutes per month on Facebook (Facebook Press Page, 2010). Lohnes (2008) stated that Facebook was also found to hold more th an 85% of the market share at 4 year universities. College students insist that using the Internet is a necessity (Snorgrass, 2009). Rainie (2010) found that 74% of adults 18 years or older use the Internet, more specifically 93% of 18 29 year olds. Accor ding to Snorgrass (2009), "The 2002 PEW Internet and & American Life Project study revealed that 86% of the college student population had frequented the Internet while only 59% of the general population had done so ." (p. 61). Therefore, providing eviden ce that college students are more apt to use online services than other adult age groups. The first website, create d by Tim Berners Lee in 1994, i s also considered to be the first blog (Barlow, 2007; Bausch, Haughey, Hourihan, 2002). The site was considere d the first web log because it


40 not only provided a means for people to get together and chat through email, it also served as a means for Berners Lee to discuss new websites as they appeared and render his opinion about them (Douglas, Little, Smith, 2006). "Web log" was later combined by John Barger to "weblog" and further reduced to "we blog" then, just "blog" by Peter Merholz (Barlow, 2007). Initially, blogs were used to list links that the author thought were amusing, interesting or informative (Rodzv illa, 2002). However, blogs evolved into utilitie s where people could discuss their personal issues, emotions, and political views, regardless of whether others may feel that the views are slanted or informative (Barlow, 2007). Bloggers, those who blog, po st to a blog where the last or most recent posts remain at the top of the list and a series of posts that lead to a discussion are considered a thread (Rodzvilla, 2002). Although research on the use of blogs has increased in recent years, the focus of th e research has been based mainly on blogs used for political views, journalistic information, marketing, and pedogological applications (Schieder, 2008). In contrast, Kozinets (2002) conducted research on blogs as an ethnography, which created the term net nography: "Netnography or ethnography on the Internet, is a new qualitative research term that adapts ethnography research


41 techniques to study the cultures and communities that are emerging through computer mediated communications" (p. 61). The new resear ch method of netnography supports the use of internet blogs as a research tool since they were foun d to be far less time consuming and elaborate and allowed for studies to be conducted in a manner that was entirely unobtrusive (Kozinets, 2002). Some might say that blogs can be an onli ne diary. Suzuki (2004) suggested that online blogs were considered stronger than diaries since they were "non invasive, non threatening observation instrument, [and] easily maintained over a period of time" (p. 6). Suzuki (2004) also stated that "the blog has the status of a valid research tool in its own right: the data recording is systematic, disciplined, replicable, is open to scrutiny real time, and offers insight" (p. 6). The research conducted comparing online blogs to diaries as a research tool, found that the blog option was a valid resear ch alternative to diaries since they may offer new and unique possibilities in qualitative research (Suzuki, 2004). The use of blogging for interview data collection created a unique study Blogging as a form of data collection for qualitative research all ows researchers to connect to subjects and generate data for analysis (Chenail, 2008). He also observed that the "personal


42 nature of blogs can make them fruitful opportunities for qualitative researchers to study because they can afford investigators a pub lic conduit to back stage thoughts and feelings of others" (p. 75). Strampel and Oliver (2008) found that the simplicity of blog use, the convenience of asynchronous posting anytime and anywhere, and the ability to share posts with others, are a few of the benefits to using blogs. Additionally, Puri (20 07) as cited in Garland (2009) noted many advantages to blogs. For example, blogs often contain profiles that add authenticity to the participant as opposed to random people participating, without sharing an y information as with other Internet postings. Blogs have the ability to scan for consistency over time. This ability allows for fact checking and following consistent statements and themes of participants by means of several postings that can span years, depending on the length of the blog. The ability to study specific populations is also an advantage of using weblogs for research. Lastly, blogs appea r to encourage an unusual level of honesty, which leads to longer posts that often provide detailed and vi vid information. Due to the flexibility of blogs, participants can continue the survey after grad uation if necessary, unlike an other online posting program like Blackboard. This particular type of access and flex ibility


43 has advantages among typical colle ge student s aged 18 30, who according to researchers are the students most likely to participate in th e transfer process ( Kearney & al., 1995; LeBard 1999). According to Barlow (2007), the true impact of the blog remains to be seen, as blogs "may be even greater than a simple broadening of the debate within the public sphere" (p. 183). Nilsson (2003) further indicated that: Discourse devices like the monologue and the dialogue come together to create extensive conversations that spread through the blogosph ere with an effect not unlike an echo chamber. These threads of conversation use many of the linguistic features found in both oral and written forms of communication. The two major forms of communication have united to produce a variety that utilizes its digital environment as a means to converse and reflect.(p.40) Therefor e, the use of blogs contribute d an interesting and unique method of data collection to the body of knowledge and research in higher education.


44 Chapter Three : Methods Participants Archival data was used to provide a descriptive analysis of the population for this s tudy. The archival data provided by the Registrar's Office was based on transcript evaluation and headcount data. The sampling population was limited to cur rently register ed students who were in their last term of school in the f all of 2010 term. These students also applied for graduation in the f all of 2010 to be participants in this study The data were analyzed based on transfer status, time to degree and student demogr aphics: age, gender, and race. The research er use d the U.S. Census definitions of race to allow for distinctions between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander. The researcher belie ved this create d the most appropriate view of race as a potential factor for swirling. Participants for the study consist ed of undergraduate students who participated in the swirling process. The swirlers we re selected because they had a unique life experience associated with the


45 phenomenon of swirling (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003). The selected students also applied for graduation in the f all of 2010. The study attempt ed to c ommence with 50 participants and conclude with no fewer than 20 participants. The initial target of 50 p articipants was un attainable although preliminary data revealed that the population of swirlers who graduated from USF exceeded 2000 students for the 2008 2009 academic year. Therefore the researcher was unable to maintain a minimum of 20 students. However 19 students elected to participate. The 19 students provide sufficient and comprehensive insight into the swirling process through trends and individual accounts of their swirling experiences The dissertation director approved the use of 19 participants due to the intensity of the interaction, which generated 66 pages of single spaced text and allowed the study to demonstrate theoretical saturation through repetition. Instrument An interview provided an opportunity for a one on one discussion between the researcher and the participant. The discussion allo wed the researcher to ask for clarification to vague or unclear answers, which created a powerful method of data collection (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). Therefore, an interview comprised of


46 both semi structured and unstructured questions were the instrument in this study. The semi structured interview was composed of two types of questions: experience and behavior and background/demographic questions. Exp erience and behavior questions we re included to address the participants experience with swirling. While ba ckground/demographic questions we re included to provide information on the socioeconomic status and background of the participants. Follow up questions to the semi structured questions we re consi dered unstructured in terview questions since they va ried due to participant responses and were not pre planned. The study provide d a series of blog based interview questions on a blog created by the researcher. The researcher created a website, www.swirling2010.com to host the WordPress.org blog. The WordPress.org blog along with the Adminimize plug in allow ed the researcher, who also act ed as the moderator, to restrict the visibility of the comments fro m other par ticipants. T he moderator correspond ed with each of the participants to ask follow up questions, which create d threads in the blog posts. However, each participant was anonymous and the individual blog responses remain ed invisible to other participants.


47 The interview wa s comprised of a series of blog based questions using a combination of all three qualitative interview techniques: narrowly focused, in between, and broadly focused. Broad ly focused interview questions we re used to investiga te. Narrowly foc used questions we re included for clarificati on, while in between questions we re included for theory elabora tion (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). The selected participants responded to the interview questions via an online blog. Interviews can be administered in a v ariety of different ways: face to face, on the phone, in an email, or via online blog. According to Garland (2009), online research only substitutes the instrument for gathering data with the online blog interview versus interviewing participants at for e xample, a coffee shop. Conducting interviews online has both advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantage of online research is that the responses will "lack inflection, body language, and the many nuances that often communicate more vividly than words (Merriam, 2009, p. 158). Online interviews also limit the abi lity of the researcher to assess responses through gestures, mannerisms, or feedback (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). However, for this study the advantages outweigh ed the disadvantages.


48 Advantages to online data collection include widening the scope of research by offering an electronic extension of familiar research techniques, like email interviews and the asynchronous nature which allows for reflection time that would be less available in a face to face session (Merriam, 2009). Blog based interviews do not have the same major drawbacks of traditional interviews since they are not as time consuming and expensive (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). The participants post ed to the blog in response to proposed open ended questions. Depending on the responses to the questions, the posts became thread s or string s of responses. Therefore, weblogs became "simultaneous self reflecting journal entries and open ended invitations for conversations" (Nilsson, 2003, p. 2). The blog based interview questions are located in Appendix A. Research Questions The researcher address ed three single component research questions. 1) Why do students swirl? 2) What is the relationship between swirling and time to degree completion? 3) What outcomes are associated with students who participated in multiple institutional transfer process?


49 Data Collection Procedures The Registrar's Office ra n an inquiry on transfer students. This inquiry isolate d swirlers and the date s they attended their first institutions, which allow ed the researcher to calculate time to degree. The inquiry on transfer students also include d separate data on dippe rs and id entified temporary transfers. Temporary transfer students were removed from the study. The state of Florida requires students at public four year university to earn at least nine hours of summer credits at a public four year institution. Students are not necessarily required to take these hours at their home institution s Therefore, some students may have attend four year institutions near their permanent address es instead of attending their home institution s These students show ed as transfers but for the purpose of this study, we re not considered true transfers. Therefore, these students were considered temp orary transfer students and did not count in the swirler o r the dipper category. They were removed prior to re viewing the da ta on swirlers, dippers and native students The students in the swirling portion receive d an invitation to participate in a research blog. Upon acceptance, these students receive d two consent forms. One form enabled the student to


50 participate the intervie w, while the other form allow ed the researcher the ability to obtain a copy of the participant's transcript for transcript evaluation. Upon completion of the consent form, a formal invitation to join the online blog, created for research at WordPress.org, was issued. The asynchronous WordPress.org blog was continuously available through the website created to host the blog, www.swirling2010.com and only accessible to participants. According to Strampel & Oliver (20 08) students will share information unhindered in a comfortable, non public environment. The blog had the ability to accommodate an unlimited number of students. However, the study commenced with 19 participants The participants were selected a fter the f all 2010 graduation a pplication deadline had passed. At that time the researcher request ed the Registrar's office run a report to identify the students who applied for graduation and participated in the swirling process Once the list of swirlers was retri eved, the Registrar's office sent t hem an email about the study to ask if they would like to participate. The students who express an interest emailed the researcher From that group of students, 19 students were selected to participate in the interview po rtion of the study.


51 The swirlers who participate in the online interview blog ged about their swirling experience in response to posted blog questions, including consequences or benefits to swirling. The blog based interview i ncluded two descriptive questio ns that allow ed the researcher to obtain descriptive data about employment and family circumstances of swirlers in order to truly describe the context of swirling. To maintain the integrity of the data until the end and prevent data loss at any point in the research, the blog data was backed up on the www.swirling2010.com back up server on the hard drive of the researchers c omputer, and on a Ceelox Vault biometric encrypted thumb drive. Participants in the blog group were not exposed to any harmful procedures. Nor were they knowingly discriminated against in any manner. Participation did not hinder or enhance any of the stu dent's current courses nor interfere d with the student's ability to participate in graduation. A dditionally, a ll other rules of ethics provided by the I nstitutional Review Board wer e followed, without deviation, unless otherwise noted and approved by the B oard. Research Design The research design selected for this study encompass ed a complementary selection of methods and theories to obtain the best


52 overall compilation of information and insight. This qualitative study use d interviews to gain a better understanding of why students swirl. The basis of the qualitative research was grounded in the transformational learning theory. This permit ted the researcher to interpret data from the participants to check for changes in fram es of reference and differing points of view. In addition to trans formational learning, the study also employ ed a heuristic phenomenological approach. The use of this approach allow ed the researcher to use her knowledge to analyze the data obtained based on her expertise with the transfer and admissions processes. Finally, the population of participants were described using descriptive statistics received from the Registrar's Office. The use of descriptive statistics provide d insight into which students pa rticipated in swirling based on ethnicity, age, gender, and socioeconomic status. The purpose of this research wa s to gain insight into why students participate in the transfer process multiple times. Quantitative research using historical data may replica te information that already exists in the body of transfer research, but using q ualitative research methods enable d the researcher to review information uniquely obtained directly from the swirlers who participate d in the study Participants had the opport unity to


53 contribute their insight and experiences about the transfer process, why they chose to transfer and wha t they learned from the transfer experience Learning from experiences by assigning them meaning and questioning future assumptions or using ac quired experiences as a guide to future action is considered transformational learning (Mezirow, 2000; Cranton, 2006). According to Mezirow (2000), human beings have an urgent need to understand experiences so the experiences can be integrated into what is already known to avoid chaos. In an effort to understand the data provided by swirlers about their experiences, this research was grounded in transformational learning. The transformational learning theory is based on frames of reference. A frame of reference is divided into two dimensions: habit of mind and point of view. The habit of mind dimension acts as a filter for interpreting the meaning of expe riences through predispositions, w hile the point of view dimension consists of a cluster o f meaning schemes, which include schemes on value and sense of self. These sche mes ultimately determine what humans see and how individuals interpret what they see.


54 In addition to establishing frames of reference and points of view, disco urse is an import ant part of transformational learning Discourse involves dialoguing with others gain a better understanding of an experience (Mezirow, 2000). More importantly, reflective discourse is the primary form necessary for transformational learning to take place since it also includes emotional, social and cognitive components in the dialogue (Mezirow, 2000). Swirlers may have experienced emotional and social changes to their frame of reference or point of view as they transferred among institutions. Each transfer experience may or may not have altered their frame of reference. Students already have a frame of reference about higher education. The reference could come from their initial institution or from adopting someone else's point of view. However, something i n their frame of reference may have changed which caused them to participate in the transfer process. The swirler s perspective on the transfer process can effect how they view the quality of the new institu tion and their willingness to socialize in the n ew environment The student's ability to maint ain a similar level of academic performance and his/her overall assessment of the new institution in comparison to the previous institution could


55 also depend on the student's transfer experience and change in frame of reference. To explain the findings, a phenomenological approach was selected for this study. This approach was selected because this design is often used to understand the experience of human bei ngs (Creswell, 1998). Heuristic phenomenology supports the notion that the personal experience s and insight of the researcher is important. Patton (200 2) specified that the researcher "must have personal experience with and intense interest in the phenomen on under study.It is the combination of personal experience and intensity that yields an understanding of the essence of the phenomenon." (p. 107). The researcher for this study has an extensive back ground in transcript evaluation and the withdrawal proc ess and transfer processes at multiple institutions. The researcher has been employed as an admission repres entative, a cademic advisor and transfer articulator. As an admissions representative the researcher was responsible for assisting students with enr oll ment in to higher education. When students enroll in college academic advisors are available to guide them as they progress through school towards graduation. If an in coming student transfers credit to their new institution, th en their advisor will revi ew that information with them However, a transfer articulator provided


56 the initial evaluation of the previous institution's transcript for credit transferability. The researcher's current position in higher education provides an opportunity to monitor student participation in the withdrawal process and evaluate reasons for withdrawal. Given the researcher's background, she maintain ed a professional and ethical persp ective throughout the duration of the study since i t wa s the goal of the researcher to strengthen the knowledge in higher education by seeking answers from swirlers to provide insights to the complex phenomenon of swirling. In order to enrich the study w ith descriptive information, a rc hival data pertaining to overall at tendance in higher education from the initial entry to graduation were retrieved from the Office of the Registrar. These data on graduation were used to compare three independent groups, swirlers, dippers, and native students, using the dependent variable of time to degree. Swirlers, dippers and native students were compared by length of time to degree to ascertain which group experienced the longe st degree completion time. The Registrar's office provide d the data on time to degree for each of the identified groups. The researcher continue d the research by interviewing a limited group of swirlers.


57 The researcher used a purposeful sampling method more specifically criterion samp ling to select the participants (Miles & Huber man, 1994). Criterion sampling wa s used for quality assurance purposes when all of the cases or participants selected for the sample has met some criterion (Miles & Huberman, 199 4). The criteria for selection were that the participa nt must be a registered student at the University of South Florida who had applied for graduation for the fall semester of 2010 and must have participated in the swirling process. Students a re the best source of information about the reasons the y left previous institutions, why they c hose their current institutions and were more likely to describe, with accuracy, the outcomes of their decisions. Once selected, the students were invited to join an online blog. The blog consist ed of interview questions posted for the participant's response. The blog questions continue d until they have been exhausted. Although it was not necessary, the students could have continue d to blog about their swirling transfer experience after the conclusi on of one semester and into the next Since the blog was asynchronous, participants were allowed to answer the posted questions at any time (D ouglass, Little, & Smith, 2006). T he blog questions were posted for two days, after the two days, two additional


58 q uestions were posted until the questions we re exhausted. The questions were available for reply and follow up responses for at least two weeks after the first set of questions posted. Depending on the responses from the blog, the researcher ask ed follow up questions to ascertain in depth information on that particular experience (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). The follow up questions, as needed create d a thread for the blog. T o protect the confidentiality of the participants t he blog remained private, by invitat ion only, and the responses were not visible to anyone other than the researcher. The data set include d online interview responses, field note s, and transcript analysis. All of these data were reviewed to compile the final research information. However, as a set, they provided credibility t o the study through reliability and internal and external validity. The interview responses obtained from the participants were triangulated to maintain int ernal validity. "Triangulation using multiple sources of data means comparing and cross checking data collected through observations at different times or in different places, or interview data collected with different perspectives" (Merriam, 2009, p. 216 ). Individual p articipant responses were considered only one participant's experience, compared to the researcher's experiences,


59 and reviewed in the context of previous research on the transfer process. External validity, in relation to qualitative studie s, encompasses the richness of the data. Rich, thick data typically refers to the participants, the setting of the study, and a detailed description of the findings, using quotes from the participants, documents, and field notes (Merriam, 2009). The online interview create d a situation where it wa s difficult to provide field notes that describe the setting outside of an online website and blog site. Nevertheless, including descriptions of how long the blog posts are, the need for follow up questions, and th e period of time between posts can be used to enhance the richness of the online data. For example, the need for follow up questions could illustrate the reluctance of a participant to initially share information. The other two components of external valid ity participant interviews and documents in the form of academic transcripts were used and analyzed without variation from the traditional interview to maintain external validity. Reliability is usually based on the ability for study replication. Unfor tunately, qualitative research does not always lend itself to obtaining the same results when replicated, but that notion "does not discredit the results of any particular study" since there can be


60 "numerous interpretations endeavored to make sure that the findings of this research we re consistent with the data presented, and in doing this the study will be considered dependable (Merriam, 2009). The participants respond ed to the research questions regularly until the questions are exhausted. In an effort t o ensure an adequate engagement of the data, the researcher employed the constant comparative method. The constant comparative method "involves comparing one segment of data with another to determine similarities and differences" to identify patterns in th e data (Merriam, 2009; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). The researcher analyze d the data daily and logged into the blog twice a day afternoon and evening, to check for and review new postings. After thoroughly re viewing each post, a decision was made whether or not to respond to the participant with a follow up question for clarificatio n When responses we re received from different participants to the same question, the constant comparative method was employed. After all of the blo g based interview q uestions had been answered, the data will be organized using a Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS). CAQDAS was selected because of its many advantages. The advantages include d an organized filing system for data analysis, enhanced rigor due to a close


61 examination of the data as encouraged by the software, the ability for mapping, and the ability to support large data sets (Merriam, 2009). Atlas TI software was selected to arrange the online interview data. The Atlas TI software org anize d the data for trends and repetition. After several rounds of coding t hemes beca me apparent and im portant if they reoccurred or receive d a lot of responses or if a major ity of the participants said it was significant (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003). The researcher also engage d an external reviewer to review the data independently and check for themes and trends. The independently re view ed data was compared to the researcher's results to ensure that all of the themes and pertinent data were capt ured. W hen the themes and data we re reported, the researcher use d verbatim quotes from the participants including grammatical and spelling errors. The collected data were not subjected to a member check as the researcher wa s not summarizing or transcribing recor ded data. Member checks are used in qualitative research in an attempt to verify findings by allowing the respondent or participant to corroborate the information obtained by the researcher (Sc h wandt, 1997). T he data obtained in this study we re typed by th e participant and submitted in


62 the participant's own voice and writing style, thus not requiring member check. Although the data for all participants were considered during the Atlas TI and code checker review, a transcript analy sis also transpired for the participants who complete the interview in its entirety. The transcripts for the participants were reviewed. The transcript analysis revealed the types of institutions attended by the swirlers as well as their transfer patterns: reverse transfers, lateral transfers, traditional transfers, or combinations thereof. Information obtained from the transcripts along with the results of the blog based interview provide d a unique insight into the participants transfer experience as well as their intentions and expectations when they enrolled in each college. Summary There is some research available on multi institutional transfer patterns based on archival data and longitudinal cohort studies. However, there is little qualitative research available that can shed some light on why students swirl and any outcomes associated with swirling. Additional research wa s necessary in order to truly understand the phenomenon of swirling. More specifically, a qualitative style of research was employed to discover the reasons students participated in the sw irling process


63 The remaining chapters provide additional information on swirling and transferring. Chapter Four presents a detailed account of the research conducted and disclose s all findings observed by the researcher. The final chapter, Chapter Five, provide s a discussion of the research and a conclusion, as well as any potential policy or institutional imp lications associated with the finding and conclusions.


64 Chapter Four : Research Finding s Overview The purpose of this phenomenological study was to ascertain the reasons why students part icipate in the swirling process, to investigate whether swirling extends time to degree completion and to discover any other outcomes associated with multiple institutional transfers. The researcher employed qualitative methods to obtain data from students who actually parti cipated in the swirling process. Interviewing these students allowed the researcher to examine multiple institutional transfers from the swirling student's perspective in reference to the three research questions: 1) Why do students swirl? 2) What is the relationship between swirling a nd time to degree completion? 3) What outcomes are associated with students who participated in multiple institutional transfer process? The interview was designed to obtain data pertaining to the research questions through a series of structured and semi str uctured


65 question s The interview data were subjected to a comparative analysis twice a day. Comparing and cross checking data ut ilizing multiple sources is known as triangulation (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994) Triangulation of the data assisted with maintaining internal validity (Merriam, 2009). The refore, the researcher also triangulated the data in reference to the individual response, the researchers knowledge of the data, and the most research available. The interview data were organized with Atlas TI softwa re to reveal themes in the data. Additionally, the data obtained from the interviews were reviewed in reference to the transformational learning theory to determine changes in the participant's frame of reference and points of view. Lastly, t hese interviews were accompanied by archival transcript data provided by the Registrar's Office. The transcripts analysis confirmed the data collected in the interview and contributed to the external validity of the study Onl ine Blog Blogs as online data coll ection have several advantages. These advantages include widening the scope of research by offering and electronic extension of familiar research techniques, like online surveys and email interviews (Merriam 2009). Blog based interviews also do


66 not accrue the expense and time consuming transcription process of traditional interviews (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). Howeve r, bl og based research required fore thought and planning. Two major con cerns were addressed prior to the creation of the blog in order to provide the best blogging or interview experience. The first concern was where to locate the blog. The researcher created a webpage, hosted by popular web based company, to host the blog. The second concern was how to privatize the blog. The blog was difficult to locate on the Internet since it was delisted from search engines. Extra precautions were taken to prevent blog availability to any one other than the invited participants. The researcher created a webpage, www.swirling2010.com to host the on line blog using WordPress .org software. The WordPress .org blog was then fortified with Adminimize, WP Private Messages, and Private! WordPress Acce ss Control Manager, to secure the identity of the participants The extra precautions required the participants to login to the blog and to their individual blog page to maintain participant and response anonymity. Unique individual pseudonyms (Swirler 1, Swirler 2, etc.) and passwords were created by the researcher and emailed to the each pa rticipant upon creation of his or her personal profile


67 Two interview questions were posted to the blog every two days until the questions were exhausted. The blog remained open for two weeks to all ow the participants an opportunity to complete the interview at their leisure. The extended time allowed the participants an opportunity to reflect on their respons es, which is an advantage of on line versus face to face interviews (Merriam, 2009). During t his two week window, the participants had unlimited access to their blog page; the asynchronicity of the blog allowed the participants access 24 hours a day, seven days a week (Douglass et al., 2006) The researcher also had an opportunity to read the blog responses and reply with any additional questions necessary to clarify vague or unclear answers, thereby making the interaction a true blog based interview and a powerful data collection method (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998 ; Rubin & Rubin, 2005 ). However, a ccess to the blog was limited to participants in the research study to maintain anonymity Participants The Registrar's Office identified 1242 swirlers. However, only 510 swirling students met the criteria set forth by the researcher. The students must have attended at least two prior institutions and applied for grad uation in pursuit of their first bachelor's degree, in the fall of 2010. The selected students were sent a Participation Letter (A ppendix


68 B) via email to inform them about the upcoming rese arch opportunity. The first email yielded 34 respondent emails from swirlers interested in participating in the study. However, only 12 students completed the necessary Informed Consent (Appendix C) and Transcript Request (Appendix D) forms required for pa rticipation The interview for the 12 participants began as stated in the Participant Letter. Yet, in an attempt to increase the number of participants, t he researcher contacted the Registrar's Office to have the Participation L etter dispatched in another email to the target population The second email yiel ded an additional 19 interest ed students. Yet, only seven of those students completed the informed consent and transcript request forms by the interview commencement deadline. A total of 19 swirlers co mpleted the documentation necessary to participate in the study. Of those participants, three students did not complete the interview process leaving a net of 16 part icipants who completed the blog. The goal was to have a minimum of 20 participants complet e the study, however for phenomenological studies a sample size of six participants can be sufficient as long as the data reaches theoretical saturation (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994). The researcher was aware that a large n umber of par ticipants was not necessar y to increase the credibility of the study as the purpose of the


69 interview was to obtain different points of view, then compile the interviews to provide a complete picture (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). Thus, the number of participants in this research study was sufficient since the number of participants provided 66 pages of typed single spaced data, which was enough data to reach theoretical saturation. The dissertation director approved the eventual size of the study population The population of participants was somewhat reflective of the overall swirler population. The total population of swirlers, identified by the Registrar's Office, was comprised of 61% female (n=310) and 39% male (n=200) In reference to race, the population contained 67% White 16 .2 % Unknown; 11 .1 % Black or African American, 5 .3 % Asian or Pacific Islander and less than 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native. A review of age demographics found that swirlers' aged 19 29 dominated the population with 67% while 20% were 30 39 years old; 11% were 40 49 years old; and 2% were 50 59 years old. Due to partial completion of the study by three (3) participants, the availability of data was dependent upon when the participant withdrew fr om the study. Based on the self re ported data the participants were 63% female (n=12), while 37% were male (n=7). The participa nts were comprised of 68% White 16 % Hispanic and


70 16% Unknown There were no participants who reported Black as their ethnicity. The age range of the participants was similar to the overall swirler population as 61% were 19 29 years old, 17% were 30 39 years old, 17% were 40 49 years old, and 5% were 50 59 years old The transcript analysis verified the age of the participants durin g the interview period. The pr ofile of the participant s demographics wa s similar to the demographics of the overall swirler population. Interview Analysis The interview analysis began with a constant comparative analysis The researcher logged into the blog twice a day, in the morning and the evening to review the postings created by the participants The data for each question were reviewed independently and in comparison with the other responses to the same question to determine similarities, differenc es and patterns in the data (Merriam, 2009). The constant comparative method ensured external validity through adequate engag e ment with the data. Us ing the constant comparative method allowed the researcher to review each response daily and ask follow up q uestions to make sure similar information was being shared. For example, the first interview question asked the participant s to desc ribe themselves and their families The question required a descriptive response but was


71 vague enough for the participant t o have multiple interpretatio ns. Consequently, the researcher had to follow up with a specific question to inquire about their ethnicity, age and other demographic related information for 53% of the participants The participants who comp leted the interview did so in a variety of ways. Many participants logged in every other day when new questions were posted and provided a respo nse to those questions. O thers waited until all of the questions were posted to log in and provide responses. The majorit y of the participants employed a hybrid of the two aforementioned schedules. Participant responses were engaging and forthcoming. The interview questions seemed appropriate as the response indicated O ne participant tended to second guess her posts. She wo uld often end her posting with Hope this helps if I didn't answer what you needed, please let me know and I'll be happy to readdress the issue ." O r Does this cover what you need to know? One participant experience a language barrier that required clari fication of the interview questions, but on c e the clarified questions were posted, her response was immediate. Only one participant admitted to difficulty navigating the blog. Initially, she emailed the researcher to express her concerns about


72 accessing t he blog. The researcher replied with step by step instructions on accessing the blog along with a second notification of her login and password. As the blog neared close, the participant emailed the researcher in reference to another failed attempt. The em ail also stated she would not make another attempt at completing the interview because access the blog was too difficult. Two other participants did not complete the blog based interview. Similar to the participant described previously one participant failed to answer any questions contained on the blog. Apparently she underestimated the difficulty of her final few courses. She withdrew from the study to focus on successfully completing her classes. The final participant who did not c omplete the interview actually began the interview. He immediately logged in and provided responses to the first two questions. After posting those two responses, he did not return to the blog to answer the balance of the questions. A reminder email was se nt to all participants prior to the blog closing. Unfortunately, he did not revisit the interview. Regardless of the different methods employed for responding to questions and the perceived language barrier each student answered the questions in a manner consistent with the researcher s


73 expectations and thereby required fewer follow up questions. Nevertheless, the ability to ask follow up questions and allow the participants to ask questions of the researcher created an opportunity that would be afforded i n a standard email or in person survey. The ability to have a conversation online was an advantage of the blog. The interview was comprised of a series of structured questions designed to collect detailed information from the participants. Two descriptive questions allowed the researcher access to descriptive data about the employment and familial circumstances of the participants before the rest of the interview Socioeconomic Status (SES) was inferred ba sed on the participants need to work wh ile enrolled in higher education, background information, and current living conditions Participants who came from a family of means, were not required work while they were enrolled in college, or received assistance from their parents were coded Upper SES. Middle SES was assigned to participants who stated they worked while in school, shared details about their family life that implied money was not a serious issue, but necessary. Participants who noted employment was a major factor wh ile they were enrolled in school or described a family life dependent upon employment were coded Lower SES.


74 For example, Swirler 4 was coded as Upper SES based on his response to questions number 1 which included over 20 years of vacationing out of state and a history of accountants in his immediate family I am the middle child between two sisters. I am from a typical southern family and I grew up in Northeast Tennessee. I moved to the Tampa Bay area in August 2009 with my entire family. We vacationed he re every year, for 20+ years, and finally decided that it was time to just pick up and move here. I am from a family of Accountants and that had a major impact in my choosing the Accounting degree for myself. My father, older sister and her husband all hav e Accounting degrees. Accounting is also prevalent in my extended family as well. While Swirler 5 was coded as Middle SES because he does not work while he is in school and he has plenty of free time to enjoy life with his wife and kids. I am 30 years old I have 2 kids. One boy and one girl and are [sic] eleven years. One is adopted. I have a beautiful wife and we have [sic] married since January 1, 2000. We have been together since the summer of 1998. We enjoy doing things together like biking, walking, c amping or just all hanging out watching a movie. Every Thursday we have family time together to ensure we have our bonding time separate from our dinner conversation. I decided to leave my job (asked to get laid off) and return to school. Since I am an Arm y veteran I have the Mongomery [sic] GI Bill that pretty much pays me enough to cover my cost of living (as long as I am enrolled full time) and the Florida Prepaid College Plan that covers most of my tuition (about 80%) I really haven't needed to work.


75 S wirler 8 was assigned the code of Lower SES because employment was imperative wh ile he was in enrolled at USF and his response implied he had a unique living experience. Employment during my college career in Virginia was never a big issue. I worked, but didn't depend on work as I lived with my parents. However, moving to Florida was an individual endeavor and I attempted to fully establish myself here in Tampa. Though I moved here without a job lined up, I was able to secure one at a restaurant I had prio r experience with in Virgini a within a week of moving here. Relying on loans to pay for my classes and work to pay for my living expenses, life in Florida has been far from comfortable. My focus has been on my grades and not my living conditions. Upon comp leting school I aspire to move into a safe and clean community far from campus. These code assignments represent each of the SES options available to the researcher for coding purposes. Utilizing these codes 53% of the participants were coded Middle SES, while 23.5% of the pa rticipants were identified as Upper SES. Lower SES was assigned to 23.5% of the participants as well T he next three questions addressed contributing and influential factors associated with the participants first, second, and third (if necessary) transfers. The final question asked the participants to reflect on their college experience s and discuss the positive and negative aspects of each college they attended. Each participant was forthcoming with his or her responses to the question s requiring a minimal amount of follow up by the researcher.


76 The constant comparative method allowed the researcher to code the data and compare the data within and between categories, which constituted the first and second iteration of coding (Anfara, Brown, & Mangione, 2002). The results of the constant comparative analysis provided the foundat ion for the final emergent themes. After the comparative analysis, the researcher triangulated the interview data based on the partic i pant' s response, compared the data to the resear cher's knowledge on transfer/ articulation, and reviewed the data in the c ontext of previous research on the transfer process The data triangulation assisted with the coding process, by providing corroboration to previous research and generating additional themes. Atlas Ti software was selected to assemble the online interview data; it was emp loyed as an organized filing system for data analysis. One advantage of using Atlas Ti was the simplicity of transferring the online interview data into the Hermeneutic Unit file. Other advantages included enhanced rigor through close examination of the data as encourage by the software, the software's ability to support large data sets and the ability of mapping (Merriam, 2009). The 66 page interview data file was copied into Atlas Ti, via drag and drop, and then coded over several rou nds of coding to reveal themes and important trends.


77 The researcher also engaged an external reviewer to examine the data independently and check for themes and trends. The external reviewed has a bachelor's degree in marketing and master's degree in business management He has spent several years dedicated to study ing the behavior of people and has completed four doctorate level courses in higher education. The researcher provided the external reviewer with the transcript of each participant s intervi ew. The data included only the participant s synonyms and all references to names or participant identities were str uck from the interview transcripts. The external reviewer analyzed the data and met with the researcher to compare themes and trends. The researcher and the external reviewer decided upon six prevalent th emes for why students swirl, conferred on the status of the relationship between swirlin g and time to degree completion and decided on what outcomes were associated with students who participated in the multiple institutional transfer process. Why Do Students Swirl? Prevalent Themes An analysis of the interview responses using the comparati ve an a lysis, triangulation an external reviewer, and Atlas Ti software revealed six themes. Data from the third, fourth, and fifth interview questions (Appendix A) were designed to provide answers to the first research question: Why do students swirl? Participant responses were


78 often coded with multiple reasons for participation in the transfer process. Each individual codes was assigned to one of the six prevalent themes. The six prevailing themes are: a. Search for Perspective b. Moved/Relocated c. Academic I ssues d. Completion e. Financial Difficulty f. Health Concerns Search for p erspective. T he theme entitled search for perspective is comprised of several components. The four sub codes assigned to this theme are self discovery, reassessment of goals, intention to tr ansfer, and institutional dissatisfaction. Although each of the sub codes was different they all share the underlying theme of the participants search for perspective or perceived satisfaction. Five participants sought self discovery. One participant chos e to transfer to pursue a life long goal. Swirler 8 stated, "The first transfer I made was to a small Bible college in Franklin Springs, Georgia. The reason for this transfer was to take a chance on something I've always wanted to do: lead worship." Swirle r 18 also moved due to fulfilling a


79 life long goal, "I knew that I was meant to live in Florida and always dreamed of going to college in Florida." T wo others participants just needed change in their liv e s and wanted to experience something new. Swirler 19 wanted to experience a new environment, I really wanted to get out o f Florida ." So, the decision to leave was based on a search for change. In contrast, Swirler 17 implied his reason for leaving was mor e self preserving, My first transfer came about because I was in the midst of a major life transition. At the time i [sic] was living in south florida [sic] (Cooper City) and i [sic] was making some bad decisions. Trying to help me get my life in order, m y older brother offered for me to come live with him in St. Petersburg and I did. Dissatisfaction with their institution was the most frequent assignment of for this code. Dissatisfaction manifested itself in a variety of ways. One participant was dissati sfied with the advising at the institution. Swirler 6 regretted attending a college due to the advising, Looking back I realize what a mistake that was because I had nearly enough credits to achieve an AA yet my advisors never seemed to guide me in the ri ght direction. I found myself taking classes I did not need. While a nother participant Swirler 3 was upset with both the admission an d academic departments at her school and those feelings resulted in her transfer,


80 I didn't like having to take a college placement test after I was already considered a junior this should be for those transferring as lower level students or initial enrollees only. I had clearly taken well above the classes they were telling me i [sic] needed to take (for example, told me I needed to take trigonometry when I'd completed 2 semesters of calculus). Swirler 18 also stated dissatisfaction with academics, "I enrolled at Tidewater Community College where I took an eight week Microeconomics cla ss online in which I basically taught myself the material." Overall dissatisfaction with the institution justified one participant's reason for transfer, while another participant transferred due to the school s reputation, I went to that college because I felt I had to do something with my life, so it was a last minute decision and it only lasted about a month before I withdrew. I did not like the college and it felt like I was still wasting my time. BCC was also known as a "reject" college amongst the co mmunity, so that probably did not help either. Multiple attendance patterns were associated with this theme. Some participants with this code engaged in reverse transfer while others transferred to similar institutions through lateral transfers or elevat ed to a four year institution from a 2 year institution as a traditional transfer. One participant, Swirler 14 attend ed a 2 year institution solely w ith the intent to transfer, not complete a degree program ; "From the minute I stepped onto campus, my inte nt was to


81 earn good academic standing and transfer to USF; my goal, after all, was a Bachelor's degree, not an Associate's." With 9 out of 16 of the participant s' transfers coded search for p erspective it e merged as an important theme for college transfer. Participants had several reasons for transferring, but the overall category illustrated the students were in search of something more fulfil ling. In some cases the search included self discovery, w hile also includi ng multiple forms of satisfaction : satisfaction with s elf, institutional satisfaction and academic satisfaction. Moved/Relocated. Two sub codes were embedded within the Moved/Relocated theme. The two sub codes were military orders, which caused forced re location and voluntary relocation. M ili tary orders dominated the move/r elocated theme. O ne participant married a person in the Military therefore, relo cated to a different state. The parti cipant relocated on two additional occasions due to spouse's orders The first time that I had transferred colleges was after I had married my husband. He's in the Marine Corps and after we married in May of 2005, the Marine Corps gave him orders to Quantico, VA. I honestly could not bear having him live 900 miles away. Therefore I withdrew myself from USF. After settling in to our new home in Virginia, I enrolled at a local community colleg e to continue my educatio n In 2007, we had received orders to Okinawa, Japan. After the time, I was about to transfer to George Mason University in hopes to finish my undergraduate education. But as people are all too familiar with the military


82 lifestyle, we got orders and had to pick up and go. Upon arriving in Okinawa, I enrolled in a distance learning progr am through Troy Univer sit y After coming back to the United States and luckily had been given orders to MacDill in Tampa, FL, I transferred back to USF. Two students withdrew from college to join the Air Force. Swirler 6 decided to join the Air Force in lieu of furthering her education. After two years of typical "college life" (living on campus in a dorm, joining a sorority and being away from home), I decided to leave school and join the Air Force." The other partic i pant, Swirler 15, chose to postpone completing his degree by joining the Air Force Reserves, I got hired as a Boom Operator in the 314 Air Refueling Squadron at Beale Air Force Base on the KC 135 in 2005 and trained on active duty orders for the entire year of 2006. During this period I did not attend any colleg e courses due to the intensity of the military technical training that I was involved in. Swirler 15 en rolled at USF due to a relocation to MacDill as part of his military obligation. The other code included in this theme is voluntary relocation. Voluntar y relocation included moving because the participant's family or friends moved, randomly moving to another area, and electing to move for employment. One participant relocated to t he United States from Argentina; while another participant just "relocated from Omaha, Nebraska to Tampa with two little girls." One participant, Swirler 8 "was asked to move to Florida to assist in a church plant" therefore, he


83 relocated to be with his church family. Two other participants moved to be with their friends. Swirler 19 moved out of state t o attend college with a friend but after one term she moved back to Tampa due to the cold weather. Swirler 3 moved to Florida with a boyfriend, who is now her husband In lieu of staying with family, one student moved away for empl oyment. Swirler 13 stated he "decided to move out of state to take full time employment. There was a lot of opportunity in retail without a college degree, and I was well on my way up the ladder already." The moved/r elocated theme encompas sed various reasons for participant mobility in the transfer process. The two categories for coding were forced relocation and voluntary relocation. Forced relocation was reserved for participants who moved due to orders from the military. However, voluntary relocatio n was assigned to participants who willing relocated for a variety of reasons. Overall, Moved/Relocated accounted for 10 out of 16 participants' reasons transfer Academic i ssues. The researcher discovered 7 out of 16 participants described transfers related to academic issues. There were four codes noted within the Academic Issues theme. The four sub


84 codes include d remediation, academic failure, difficult coursework, and major availability. One student was a reverse transfer. She began her education at a four year college in Argentina. Due to the difference in the education systems between the United States and Argentina and the language barrier apparent in her writing, she completed se veral remediation courses at a local two year college. Although o ther participants displayed remedial courses on their transcripts, the enrollment in the remediation courses was not associated with a transfer. Three participants transferred due to academic failure. Research found that academic failure is normally classi fied as a forced transfer since the participant is typically forced to transfer to another school in order to compl ete his/her education (Cope & Hannah, 1975; Hagendorn & Castro, 1999). Swirler 14 was enrolled in New College of Florida for approximately t wo and a half years prior to leaving. The academic failure not only created a forced reverse transfer, but also a stop out. My first two years were very successful I was asked to leave NCF in May 2008, and I did not return to school until January 2009 Since I had been asked to leave NCF, I was not eligible to apply to University of South Florida. I applied to Manatee Community College to get back into good academic standing at an institution so I could apply to USF.


85 Two additional participants were academically unsuccessful. Both experienced academic failure at multiple institutions. Swirler 11 accrued poor grades at the two year institution he first attended, but decided he needed a change. However, upon his transfer to a four year institution he confessed to participating in a reverse transfer due to grades. I felt as though transferring to a new state and a new school would be a change of scenery, a nd hopefully improve my grades. I transferred from ABAC back to SF CC after attending ABAC for one academic year. My grades had still continued to be poor Swirler 6 entered higher education at a four year institution but was forced to experience both a lateral and a reverse transfer due to academic failure. At first she was successful in school, My first semester I took 5 classes and did well. My second semester I pledged a sorority and my grades plunged. My third semester showed an improvement (thanks to a threat from dad) and my interest fell by my fourth semester. S he withdrew from school for a while, but when she enrolled at her second four year institution she was force to withdraw again due to academic failure. Swirler 6 experience d a difficult situation which caused her to be unsuccessful,


86 After my second daught er was born I enrolled full time at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. During my first semester there I was served divorce papers 3 weeks before the semester was over. Unfortunately my grades suffered again in a different way She relocated to Tampa and enrolled in Hillsborough Community College (HCC). Unfortunately, her poor grades continued, I wish I could say that I excelled while working full time, taking classes full time and raising two children full time unfortuna tely that was not the case a nd I was placed on academic probation During her enrollment at HCC, she was eventually successful in improving her grade point average, which facilitated her traditional transfer to USF. The final two s ub codes found in the academic i ssues theme are difficult coursework and major availability. One participant confessed to having difficulty with his/her coursework while another participant revealed she had to transfer because she was not admitted into her major. Swirler 10 shared several reasons for h er transfers, but The final reason was the course work was really hard, they were on trimesters there and taking calculus one through three all within a year was very difficult for me, my gpa was falling and I wanted to go to a school where I knew I could succeed. Although she was coded academic i ssu es due to course difficulty because she did not specifically state she was failing. She only admitted to her grade point average falling or decreasing.


87 Similarly, Swirler 9 did not admit to having poor grades but she participated in the reverse transfer process due to major acceptability. Swirler 9 shared the following, "My first transfer was after my second year of undergrad. I wasn't accepted into the program I wanted, so I moved home to reconsider my optio ns. I enrolled at a local school for a few semesters" Therefore, according to Swirler 9, she was forced to transfer from a four year institution to a local two year institution. She ultimately returned to a four year institution where she completed her bachelor's degree. Completion. The majority, 60%, of the participants who attended a third institution transferred due to completio n. Overall, 9 out or 16 participants specified completion as a reason for tra nsfer. Not all participants attended standard two year institutions; s ome participants complete d trainin g at a technical school or in the military S wirler 15 acknowledged his Air Force Reserve training credit. He stated that upon completion, "The training that I earned through the air force [sic] were credited to the Community College of the Air Force (CCAF ). I realized that these credits could be transferred to the college I was enrolled in at the time." The completion of an associate's degrees at a two year school also received a code within the c ompletion theme. The transfers


88 grouped into this code resulted in a traditional transfe r. Participants who completed associate degree s or certification at a technical school transferred to USF, a four year institution, to obtain their bachelor's degree. Financial d ifficulty. Financial difficulty is considere d a voluntary transfer since the student s left their institution on their own accord, not because they were in danger of being asked to leave (DeJardins et al., 2002). Loss of parental support, loss of financial aid, limited expenses or college being too e xpensive, and employment comprised the f our sub codes of the financial d ifficulty theme. Bailey (2003) and Phelan (1999) suggested students transferred in an effort to locate more affordable tuition as recounted by many participants. Swirler 10 stated the high cost of tuition was a major reason to withdraw from school, "the tuition was $40,000 a year and I did no like having to continuaously [sic] take out loans." While Swirler 12 also reported the price of tuition as the reason for at least one transfer, The first factor that contributed to my withdrawal was the cost. I started receiving calls half way into my first semester that I owed on loans already and after hearing the amount it cost each semester ($16,000 including scholarships) I decided it was out of my league.


89 she also had diffic ulty retaining her scholarships, but maintained a unique perspective: Unfortunately, I went to a private out of state university with no transferable scholarships and New Jersey did not offer any oppo rtunities like Florida's Bright Futures. The best decision I ever made was to move to FL because FL colleges are much cheaper than colleges in the north. When I hear people complaining about how expensive tuition is for USF, I laugh if they only knew. Bo th Swirlers 9 and 13 lost scholarships as well. Like Swirler 12 Swirler 9 lost scholarshi ps because she transferred out of state. The loss of the scholarships forced her to increase her loan obliga tion. However, the loss of a two year schola r ship motivate d Swirler 13 to move out of state. There was a 17 year span between this student's two year institution enrollment and his next enrollment at a two year school in his new state, which counted as a lateral transfer due to a lack of financial aid He noted, First, my two year full scholarship to community college was up, and I decided to move out of state to take full time employment. There was a lot of opportunity in retail without a college degree, and I was well on my way up the ladder already. I had five years in with the company when I decided to quit college and take the Florida opportunity. I was 21 years old who wouldn't? I did check out community colleges in FL within the first few years, but I made too much as a single person to get financial aid, y et I did not earn enough to afford tuition, fees, and books. I was not interested in taking on student loans at the time After being away from school for 17 years, I began attending community college part time while I worked full time in the grocery store.


90 Employment can influence education in many ways. Some students leave school to work, while others take advantage of employment benefits to return to school. One participant continuously withdrew from school to alternate between working and educatio n, Two incomes were often necessary for our family, but I found working, going to school, and raising a young child to be extremely stressful. For this reason, I would work for a while and then go back to school for a while. Until my daughter started kind ergarten last year it was very difficult to attend school and finish. Employment was also a factor for other participants. Swirler 5 decided to leave school completely to work, I first started school in 2004 after I got out of the Army. At the time I had a really good job that was paying great. After I signed up for classes I got tasked to run the business for a month while the owners took a vacation. I only had 2 temp employees that had no clue what they were doing. So the majority of the workload fell o n me. I began working 18 hour days and getting very accustomed to a big paycheck. Needless to say I fell behind in 3 out of my 4 classes and ended up dropping the 3. I did finish the 4th class with an "A". After the semester was over I decided that I didn' t need to go to school to make money or be sucessfu l [sic] so I didn't go back. Yet, a fter a few years of working full time, he re entered higher education by enrolling into a technical program, which re ignited his passion for education. While Swirler 5 withdrew from school to work, Swirler 6 maintained her employment at USF in order to remain in school without experiencing financial difficulty One of my employment benefits includes two classes each semester so


91 presently my employment is a factor. If I were unemployed I would have to pay for my own schooling." Therefore, employment shaped her institutional selection, thereby becoming a reason for her transfer. Swirler 6 also experienced a loss of parental support early in her educational attendance. When her parents refused to fund her education, she withdrew and joined the Air Force to gain financial independence. In my earlier years employment was not a factor for my enrollment in college. My parents completely funded my first two years of college which was at California University of Pennsylvania. I was enrolled full time and lived on campus in a dorm My first withdrawal from school was after my sophomore year. I was 20 years old and more interested in moving forward with life rather than furtheri ng my education. Also my father refused to pay for my college until I brought my grades up. I joined the Air Force instead of focusing more on my academics F inancial d ifficulty encompassed four sub codes: loss of parental support, loss of scholarship, ed ucational expenses, and employment. Although the sub codes vary, each code represented an instance where the participant experienced financial hardship or was trying to avoid financial hardship. Financial issues influenced 8 out of the 16 participant s dec ision to withdraw or enroll in an institution of higher education. Health c oncerns. The health c oncerns theme includes student health, the health of loved ones, homesickness, and substance abuse.

PAGE 100

92 H ealth concerns accounted for the reason 6 of 16 of the participants transferred. Several participants noted homesickness as a reason for transfer. Swirler 19, revealed she transferred out of state for a c hange and to move with a friend. Although she was looking forward to the new experience and was excited t o move out of state, she discovered it was not the ideal situation. Instead of becoming the utopia she thought it would be, a few unforeseen issues arose we both learned quickly that winter up north is cold and we missed Florida way too much, so we both ended up coming back within a year and resuming our education at MCC." In addition to homesickness, stress and responsibility caused one student to experience health issues. Swirler 14 found a negative way to cope with the additional responsibility that a cc ompanied moving away to college, I had what I thought was a "good reputation." However, I ended up taking on too much responsibility; at one point, I held two jobs and was taking four classes, the equivalent of five or more classes at normal universities I certainly was not working to live, but I wanted to grow up quickly and to have adult responsibilities I thought I could handle. To manage the stress, to run away from responsibility, or to rebel against a future I felt was out of my control, I became i nvolved with drugs. Drugs were easily obtained at NCF, but instead of smoking pot, a popular drug at the school but also the drug that had gotten my brother jailed, I chose the opposite psychotropic route: uppers. Cocaine was my drug of choice, and the eff ects were violently apparent in every facet of my life.

PAGE 101

93 Her academic performance continued to decline until she was asked to leave the institution. Her use of a substance to cope resulted in a forced reverse transfer. Swirler 18 also experienced a reverse transfer, but her reverse transfer was due to a personal decline in health as well as a decline in her father's health. During a winter break from her four year institution she was injured and unable to return. She stated The reason for my transf er was due to a severe injury to my pelvis while running over winter break in Virginia (my home state) as a result of over training coupled with inadequate nutrition. This injury occurred the day before I was scheduled to return to Montana after winter bre ak in January of 2009. I could not go back to school in Montana because I could not walk for several weeks after my injury After she was injured, her father became ill as was soon diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and placed on the heart transplant list. Therefore, she remained home for a period time and enrolled in a local two year institution. Additionally, Swirler 12 also participated in reverse transfer to support an ill family member. While attending an out of state four year institution she re ceived news that drew her home, I received a call from my father that my mother tried to hurt herself and she was in the hospital. I drove two hours back home immediately to find out that it was a failed attempt at suicide. After this event, I would come h ome every weekend from school and I just decided that I did not want to be away

PAGE 102

94 from home anymore so that I could keep an eye on her an d help out with my baby sister. Upon returning to her mother's house, she enrolled in a two year institution, consequent ly resulting in a reverse transfer. Reverse transfer is not always the resulting transfer for health issues. Swirler1 experienced a lateral transfer due to he health issues. She relocated to Okinawa, Japan where she enrolled in a four year institution, bu t prior to completion, she became ill. She recalled, Unfortunately, I became extremely ill while living there and was ultimaetly [sic] medically evacuated back to the US. About 5 months later, the Marine Corps allowed my husband to fly back home to be with me. After a few months in transition, the military moved us back home to MacDill AFB in Tampa, FL. The military orders allowed her to relocate to Tampa, where she enrolled in another four year institution. Therefore, her health issues resulted in a later al transfer. Health c oncerns consisted of several inter related sub codes: student health, the health of loved ones, homesickness, and substance abuse. However, in some cases, participants were assigned several sub codes. For example, Swirler 18 stated he r health as well as her father's decline in health as the reason she withdrew from her four year institution and enrolled in a local two year institution. Ther e fore her response was coded as student health and the health of a loved one.

PAGE 103

95 Theme o verview. The number of participants represented in the themes equal more than the overall 16 participants when all themes are totaled, because s everal responses required multiple code assignments. The multiple codes were rarely within the same themes; typically mul tiple codes from multiple themes were assigned to one participant's reason for transfer Swirler 10 illustrated this notion with her response to question 3: One, was due to the fact that I was unhappy at the school I was at, it was an all engineering college and did not feel like it offered the college experience. The male to female ratio was 4 men for every one female, and I hated being the only female in my classes. Also, the tuition was $40,000 a year and I did no like having to continuaously [sic] take out loans. I also decided to change my major from mechanical engineering to chemical engineering. My family was also in Lithia, Florida which is close to USF my family got orders to move two months prior to me entering college, so I missed my family and wanted to move back with them. The final reason was the course work was really hard, they were on trimesters there and taking calculus one through three all w ithin a year was very difficult for me, my gpa was falling and I wanted to go to a schoo l where I knew I could succeed. The response was coded s earch for perspective due to the participants dissatisfaction with her institution and her reassessment of her goal with a major change; financial d ifficulty based on the overall cost of the institutio n being a factor for transfer; moved/r elocated due to her voluntary move to be with her family; health c oncerns due to her homesickness and need to relocate to be wi th them; and finally,

PAGE 104

96 academic i ssues due to the difficulty of the coursework and her decline in grade point average. Therefore an evaluation of this one response reveals that it received at least one code from five of the six themes. Hence, the themes ca n be coded in conjunc tion with other themes or stand alone. Incidentally, t he six themes were disparately distributed among the three questions. Themes prevalent within one question were often not significant in response to other questions. For example, fi nancial d ifficulty contributed to 24% of first institutional transfers, but was not identified as a reason for transfer from a second or thir d institution. Likewise, moved/r elocated was the primary reason for transfer from a second institution, though it w as only 19% of the reported reasons for leaving the first institution and not considered a reason for participation in a third institutional transfer. The data revealed the primary reasons participants transferred fro m their first institution were financia l difficulty and academic i ssues. While academic issues remained a reason for transfer from second institutions, financial difficulty was no longer considered a factor. None of the participants cited financial difficulty as a reason for transfer from their second institution. The principal reason for transfer from a second institution was due to a move or relocation. Closely followed by

PAGE 105

97 academic issues and search for perspective. The major reason for transfer from a third institution was completion. Overal l, t he dominant reason participants stated for engagi ng in the transfer process was to move or relocate as noted by 63% of the participants. Search for perspective and completion each accounted for the reason 56% of the participants' transferred Particip ants attributed financial difficulty and academic issues to the reasons for transfer at 50% and 44% respectively Health concerns were cited as a reason for tran sfer by 38% of the participants. As previously noted, participant responses may have been coded in more than one theme therefore the distribution of percentages for all themes combined exceeded 100%. Transcript Analysis The Registrar's Office provided transcripts to the researcher for th e transcript analysis. During the transcript analysis, th e researcher employed Collegesource.org to review profile information on unfamiliar ins t itutions. The college profile was used to ascertain the institution type, 2 year or 4 year The researcher analyzed 17 transcripts; one participant had a records hold that would not allow the Registr ar's office to release transcripts and one of the participants who withdrew from the study refused to release his transcript when contacted by the Registrar's Office. The remaining transcripts provided an abundance of

PAGE 106

98 inform ation. For example, 13 of the 17 transcripts reviewed showed a period of non enrollment in higher education for at least one term, but some periods were as long as eight years. N on enrollment periods would have contributed to a delayed time to degree for the participants, but credit transferability could have also contributed to delayed graduation. One participant enrolled in several remediation courses at a two y ear college and 20 of those classes did not transfer to USF. A number of participants failed c lasses and had low grade point averages, but one participant failed quite a few terms thereby causing those credits to remain non transferable. The transcript analysis for one of the participant s who did not complete the study revealed that she was unabl e to transfer 45 cours es of previous c ollegiate work towards her degree at USF because they were technical courses On average participant s who began at a two year college transferred 74 credits while participant s who began at a four year institution trans ferred an average of 81 credits. Overall, the participants transferred an average of 77 credit hours. According to the transcripts, 59% of the participant s began their education s at a local two y ear college, whereas 41% began their education s a t a fo ur year institution. Only 10 % of the participant s who started a two y ear college graduated within four years. The remainder

PAGE 107

99 took an average of 10 years to finish with a range of 6 to 25 years to complete In contrast, 29% of participant s who started their academic career at a four year instituti on graduated in four years. However, similar to the two y ear college entrants the balance of the participant s graduated in an average of 10 years, wi th a slightly larger range of 6 to 28 years to complete Based o n transcript data, 71% of the participant s attende d two previous institutions and 29% attended at least three inst itutions prior to USF. Since swirling is comprised of multiple at tendance or enrollment patterns, reverse transfer, lateral transfer, and trad itional transfer patterns were discovered in the data. Although 89% of the participant s enrolled in at least one two year college throughout their journey in higher education only 65% experienced a reverse transfer. While 53% of participant s engaged in lateral transfers, the traditional transfer pattern dominated with a total of 21 instances. This pattern was noted in instances because although 94% of the participants experienced a traditional transfer, 18% of the participant s experienced at least t wo traditional transfers. A snapshot of the 65% of participant s who participated in the reverse transfer pattern revealed a population that was 82% White and 18% Hispanic. Females dominated this transfer pattern at 82%

PAGE 108

100 female to 18% male. Socioeconomic st atus w as equally distributed between u pper SES (36. 4%) and lower SES (36.4%) with m iddle SES (27.2%) comprising the balance. The reverse transfer pattern was the first transfer pattern for 64%, while for the remaining 36% it was the second transfer pattern Lateral transfer accounted for 53% of the swirling participants transfer patterns. The participants who engaged in lateral transfers were predominantly W hite and female, at 67% and 56% respectively; whereas, 22% were Hispanic and 44% were male. The majo rity, 56%, of the participants began at a two year institution and the remaining 44% initially enrolled a t a four year institution. The m iddle SES dominated the lateral transfer pattern with 75%, the balance was divided equally between upper SES and l ower SES at 12.5%. The transcri pt analysis confirmed the data from the interview analysis on transfer patterns. Finally, a review of the participant s transcripts confirmed the self reported interview data on institutions attended. The transcript review also noted each participant's successful degree completion The 17 transcripts identified 17 bachelor's degrees awarded by USF. The awarded bachelor's degrees were somewhat varied. The br eakdown for awarded degrees was as follows: three Social Work degrees; two

PAGE 109

101 degrees for Interdisciplinary Social Science, English, and Criminology; and one deg ree in International Business, C ommunication, Finance, Chemical Engineering, Accounting, Sociology, Biology, and Women Studies. Th e majority of the participants, 10 out of 17, were enrolled as full time students during their last term, while 7 out of 17 were enrolled as part time students. What is the Relationship Between Swirling and Time to Degree Completion? Degree completion and persistence in higher education among stu dents who participated in the swirling process is an important component of the swirling experience. S everal researchers established that s wirlers persist to degree completion (Bach et al., 1999;Adelman, 1999; Kearney & Townsend, 1991). The purpose of this research data was to attain the time to degree of swirlers in relation to native students and dippers. The comparison of these data allowed the researcher to note the impact of multiple institutional transfer s on degree completion. The Registrar's Office generated raw data on time to degree based on student who applied for graduation in the fall of 2010. The data contained the date each student initially entered higher

PAGE 110

102 education. The researcher used the data from the Registrar's Office to tabulate time to degree fo r swirlers, dippers, and n ative students. Native students attended USF as their only institution of higher education. Students in this category did not complete any dual enrollment or cross enrollment courses. These USF only students accounted f or 6.3% of the graduating population and completed their degree within an average of 4.5 years. Similarly, dippers completed their degree programs within an average of 4.9 years. Dippers attended USF as their first institution. However, after the student enrolled at USF, they "dipped" into other institutions for a few course. During the time the stud ents dipped they may or may not have been enrolled at USF, but they did not break their continuous enrollment at USF or engage in a complete transfer to another institution. Once the course at the other institution has concluded the course is transferred b ack to the student's home institution. According to Bach et al. (1999A), approximately one third of the students in their study enrolled in a two year institution to supplement the ir coursework at a four year institution. However, due to the restricted, w ell defined definition of dippers, only 3.3% of the students who applied for graduation were classified as dippers.

PAGE 111

103 The data on swirlers r evealed that swirlers graduate wit hi n an average of 10.21 years Swirlers participated in the transfer process on at least two occasions. Students in the swirler category have attended a variety of institutions and may have experienced multiple attendance patterns Attendance patterns include traditional transfer, lateral transfers, reverse transfers and combinations of these patterns Swirlers comprised 41.2% of the fall 2010 graduation applicants Swirlers represented in the fall ap plicants for graduation at USF we re consistent with Peter and Cataldi 's (2005) findings that 40% of the students in higher education attended more than one institution. The remaining 49.2% of the applicants were attributed to transfer students who experienced only one transfer. These students attended a singular institution prior to enrollment at USF. The nature of the ir transfer is unknown, but could be associated with a traditional or lateral transfer. Student s who transferred college credit from dual enrollment were also placed in this category because USF was not their first inst itution of higher education. On average they completed within 7.32 years. The data generated by the Registrar's Office found that swirler s experienced a delay in time to degree. The findings are supported by previous research on transfer students (Barton, 1997; Gao et al, 2002;

PAGE 112

104 McCormick, 1999 ; Rab, 2004 ). The transcript analysis of the participants also supported the outcome of delayed time to degree. The transcript analysis re vealed the participants took an average of 10 years to complete regardless of whether they initially enrolled in a two year or four year institution which was consistent with the calculated time to degree for the swirler population What Outcomes Are Associated With Students Who Parti cipated in the Multiple Institutional Transfer Process ? The final question of the interview required the participants to reflect on their entire college experience and note the positive and negative aspects of their experience. The responses provided inf ormation on outcomes associated with swirling as well as perspective on transformational learning. Transformation learning occurred when the participants assigned meaning to their experiences and either questioned their perspective or adjusted their future actions based on their past experience (Meizrow, 2000; Cranton, 2006). The request for participants to reflect on their previous experience allowed the researcher and the participant an opportunity to gain insight into why they participated in the swirlin g process. The participants were able to summarize what they learned from the experiences. Questions two through five challenged the participants to

PAGE 113

105 recall events that resulted in transfer and report on their frame of reference at that time. T he sixth qu estion asked the participants to construct a current frame of reference or point of view based on a historical recount of the information This reflective discourse, dialogue to gain a better understanding of their experience, is the primary form through which transformational learning takes place (Mezirow, 2000). In contrast to the responses for questions two through five, the response s to question six were mostly positive. M any participant s attempted to provide at least one positive aspect of their prev ious institution even if they were dissatisfied with the institution Swirler 3 attended her second institution for only one semester due to dissatisfaction, but noted, The good things were the small class sizes and getting more one on one time with teac hers as well as being a short commute to home Swirler 10 classified her transfer to USF as a positive experience. She recalled, The most positive thing that occured [sic] was that I got to enjoy college after transferring [sic] to USF. My first college had few activities for people to become a part of, but since moving to USF I was able to join a sorority where people actually did activities such as philanthropies and volunteer work. At my previous school it was all about studyi ng. I feel like at USF I was able to make friends that will last a life time [sic] while at my last school I only made friends so that I could pass that specific class.

PAGE 114

106 In some cases while the participants' responses were overwhelmingly negative they m anaged to include posi tive aspects. However, some participants refused to prove any positive information on certain institutions. For example, Swirler 7 enjoyed her enrollment at HCC, but found USF to be less enjoyable, I love HCC because students have mo re close relationship with professors. I think professors at HCC can fairly grade students because the classes are smaller. In contrast, study at USF was more difficult. It was not only for the amount of content to study, but also because neither the writi ng center nor the Bizcom center was not of help. At HCC, I found that I could find help in any class I took, but at USF it was more diff icult and sometimes impossible. Another disgusting thing of studying at USF was the fact that students have to pay to ge t a parking permit. The parking lot is in terrible condition and you never find and sport [sic] to park. I was really surprised of how bad USF works; it is more expensive than H CC, and it offer less services. She did not report any positive aspects of USF Swirler 16 concurred with Swirler 7. She likened her experience with the blog to her overall experience at USF. She stated, "The web site is difficult to get into and navigate and this is pretty much my impression of this university. Unorganized and insensitive to students, especially older returning students [sic] Likewise she did not volunteer any positive information about USF. A review of the transcripts for Swirler 7 and Swirler 16 revealed a massive loss of credit as a result of transfer, whic h could have contributed to their negative impression of USF.

PAGE 115

107 A number of participants demonstrated a change in their frame of reference and point of view based on their reflection. The two previously mentioned participants, Swirler 7 and Swirler 16, did not enjoy their transfer experience to USF and perhaps that manifested itself in an overall negative impression of the institution, which allowed other less than satisfactory interactions to compound their negative impr ession. The reverse was recounted by Swirler 5 When I transfered [sic] to USF the process was seemless [sic] I encountered few problems and the ones I did have were quickly resolved. The people seemed happy to help. Swirler 19 experienced a negative reverse transfer experience when she tr ansferred credits from a four year out of state institution to a local two year institution. She did not characterize the two year ins t itution as positive or negative, but confided that she had a pleasant transfer experience to USF from the two year college. As she continued, she spoke highly of the advisors at USF and rated her enrollment at USF positive overall. Half of the participan ts stated they had learned positive lessons from their transfer experiences, regardless of whether their experiences were positive or negative. One participant discussed the social aspects of college as a positive experience. Another participant

PAGE 116

108 not only e njoyed the social aspects of school, he also enjoyed the academic challenges. As Swirler 15 recalled his experience he stated, When I look back at all that I have been through and analyze the good and bad, I realize that most of it was good. I enjoyed meeting the interesting people in my classes and soaking up all of the information possible from the most interesting teachers. I enjoyed the life lessons and the experiences that each college offered. I enjoyed the interesting classes such as World Religi on, as well as the classes that I initially thought to be very dull to be incredibly interesting. I enjoyed the insurmountable epiphanies that I had when it took a little longer to grasp some concepts or equations. Swirler 14 found the most positive aspec t of her college experience was related to personal growth. In her words, When I entered New College, I thought I was super intelligent, the bee's knees even. After attending the school for two years during which time I found out almost everyone had highe r GPAs and test scores than me I was humbled Another facet of my personal growth involves, of course, wisdom gained from personal successes and challenges. I've always made it a point to be successful, but I savor and strive for this success more now that I experienced a time of extreme failure and disappointment. The highs feel higher, but the lows don't feel quite as bad after all, I know exactly how much I've rebuilt myself. Her positive point of view was a completely different response from the earlie r questions, where she responded she was stressed out and depressed, which resulted in her being forced out of school due to academic failure and taking almost a year off to recover. The adjustment in point of view also changed her frame of reference in

PAGE 117

109 re lation to her college experience. Based on her new revelations, she believes she had an enlightening experience with a few negative moments instead of a negative experience with a few enlightening moments. Several other students provided a similar respons e. Swirler 17 encountered a few issues just prior to graduation I nstead of being upset, he decided these things that happened gave me a better understanding of the world that adults have to live in and deal with in that they involved bad administration and bookkeeping. They were very frustrating to deal with but taught me how to handle myself when faced with unfair circumstances that I have no control over. Is there more to learn in these areas? Sure, but at least I got a start on it before actually star ting a new life in the workforce. H e stated that the most positive aspect of college experience was also his most negative. He managed to transfer the negative issues, into a positive lesson of learning, which adjusted his frame of reference from negative to positive. The researcher inquired about the negative issues he spoke of and his account of the events were not very positive, but his reflection of the events more positive. One participant, Swirler 18, experienced an awakening, which served to chan ge her frame of reference about life and provide a more positive point of view on her transfer process. Swirler 13 experienced a 17 year stop out from education to work. When he had an opportunity

PAGE 118

110 to return, he enrolled in another a two year institution. J ust as he was about to transfer to a four year institution, he was laid off from work. Swirler 13 experienced a 23 year time to degree. Yet, w hen he reflects on his college experience he believed, The most positive experience for me has been gaining a ne w awakening to myself and the world. I feel much more grounded in who I am and where I fit into this crazy world I really feel prepared for the next step in my life, which is a luxury we don't often get. Swirler 13 managed to maintain a positive outlook about college with an extended delay in degree completion. Swirler 6 also experienced an extensive stop out. She embarked upon multiple enrollments, with five stop outs, usually due to academic failure. She took 28 years to obtain her bachelor's degree. No netheless, she persisted with a positive attitude, even in the face of failure. Based on her reflection, College life has changed for me as my focus has changed from being more socially accepted by peers to focusing on the real reason of being there to further my education. Sadly I will not be graduating with Honors due to my earlier years but at least I know that I am fully capable. My mother always said "you are smart you just need to apply yourself." Ironically that is what I say to my children no w. Swirler 6 found college to have a positive effect on her perspective. She learned to focus on her education and although she could have regrets, she recalled a more positive attribute inner strength.

PAGE 119

111 The transcript analysis asserted that 82% of the participants experienced a delay in time to degree. However, when asked none of the participants stated time to degree or delayed graduation as an outcome. If the participant did not completely address outcomes associated w ith transferring, the researcher posted a follow up question to inquire about their graduation time frame. Many participants denied or defended their delay in graduation and did not believe it was outside of their expected time frame. One participant revealed he did not have a set time f rame to complete his degree. His plan was to follow his expectations. The researcher contends the reason the participants believe they completed within their time frame even though the average completion time was 10 years, is due to a change in frame of reference When the participants initially enrolled in higher education, they were aware the standard timeframe to complete a bachelor's degree was four years. This was their primary frame of reference due to societal expectations. Unfortunately, their lives began to change and they found themselves dealing with transfer after tran sfer. Perhaps they experienced difficulty with transfer credits multiple majors, or academic failure, which rendered certain courses un accepted at the ir new institution. E ach of these issue associated with transfer potentially

PAGE 120

112 forced the p articipant to accept of a delay in time to degree. Therefore, the participant continued to adjust his/her frame of reference and anticipated graduation date accordingly Swirler 17 illustrated this conclusion, with one of his re s ponses, i [sic] did complete my degree in the expected timeframe but as far as my entire college career, i [sic] feel it went way beyond my expected timeframe. H owever [sic] in retrospect i [sic] know that many student s take a longer time to finish. its [sic] different for everyone. Consequently, participants believed they were graduating within their r ealistic, adjusted time frame. Due to the setbacks, t heir frame of reference wa s more likely to focus on completion, n ot necessarily completion within a given timeframe. One problem associated with transfer was credit transferability (Bach et al., 1999). During the interview t here was mention of credit transferability, but the majority of the participants were not partic ularly upset about the loss of credit. Credit transferability was an issue e n countered by 53% of the participants. Two participants who transferred credit from out of state mentioned an issue with transferring credit due to general educational differences and credit adjustments from quarter to semester credit hours. However, the severity of credit transferability varie d by participant.

PAGE 121

113 Swirler 7 was unable to transfer 20 courses. Her response in reference to the inability to retain credit for her previous work was contained in one statement, "I was not satisfied with the transfer of those credit that were not consider ed toward the degree I was pursuing because it caused that I exceeded the 180 credits allowed for financial aid. While Swirler 7 was not satisfied with her credits issues d ue to a major financial aid issue; Swirler 8 stated I never had any sizable troubl e transferring credits between institutions. Some have been lost as they don't transfer or fit a program. But on the whole, I have faced very little issues." Since Swirler 8's issues were not as severe as Swirler 7's, he dismissed credit transferability as an issue The few participants upset with the number of credits accepted at USF revealed credit transferability issues, while others did not mention credit transferability until the researcher asked, because they did not deem it important. Several other participants credit transferability issues were discovered during the transcript review because they did not mention it during the interview. Summary The research found swirlers to be an interesting group of students. The sampled population of swirler s selected as participants, was similar to the overall population of swirlers based on data

PAGE 122

114 provided by the Registrar's Office. White females dominated the population of swirlers, while 19 29 was the prevalent age. The s elected students participated in a pr ivate, blog based interview. The da ta produced by the interview were subjected to data triangulation. Data triangulation is a component of internal validity. A triangulation of the data provided an opportunity for the researcher to crosscheck the interview data in the context of individual responses, the knowledge of the researcher, and available research on transfer patterns The data were congruent with the research findings and the researcher's previous experience. Additionally, t he data obtained from th e interview were analyzed with the constant comparative method and transcript analysis The constant comparative method allowed the researcher to review the individual response data and compare the data among responses. The constant comparative method was one component of external validity. Transcript analysis also represented a key factor in external validity. The transcript analysis summarized and confirmed the data provided by the participants. The analysis also revea led the multiple enrollment patterns among swirlers. Swirlers who participated in an intricately designed, blog based interview described many reasons for participating in a swirling

PAGE 123

115 enrollment pattern The participants provided detailed information on reverse transfer lateral tran sfer, and traditional transfer patterns The information on transfer patterns and reasons for transfer were reviewed by in external reviewer. After the external reviewer coded the data, a meeting was established with the resea rcher to solidify six themes associated with swirling: search for perspective, moved/relocated, academic issues, completion, financial difficulty, and health concerns. Outcomes and insight in the form of transformational learni ng were also discovered. C re dit transferability and time to degree were valid issues for swirling students as with transfer students. However, many participants did not recognize their delayed time to degree due to changes in frames of reference. The experience of transferring from o ne institution to another adjusted the participant's frame of r eference in relation to time to degree and thereby created an atmosphere where an extended degree completion time was acceptable Furthermore, the participants were found to be positive overall Although many of them experienced negative outcome s associated with swirling, they were more focused on the pos itive aspect of completion. As t he participants reflected back over their collegiate

PAGE 124

116 experience, each of them identified positive aspects and s hared overwhelmingly positive responses. Chapter Five, the final chapter, will address four essential areas: a discussion of the research a conclusion, along with potential policy implications and recommendation s for future research. The discussion will provide an overview of the finding s from the researcher's perspective. The n, the conclusion will include recommendation s for potential policy implications and future research.

PAGE 125

117 Chapter Five : Discussion The traditional college enrollment pattern was to simply enroll in a four year institution upon graduation from high school (Ottinger, 1991). Over time, the traditional college enrollment pattern changed to include a transfer pattern. S tudent transfer usually meant a student was transferring from a two year institution to a four year institution in pursuit o f a bachelor's degree. This traditional transfer pattern became more common as community college became a main point of entry into higher education (Cejeda, 1999; Wellman, 200 2). T oday, the mention of transfer calls for additional clarification on the type of transfer since additional more complex transfer patterns have emerged Lateral transfer, reverse transfer, and swirling have become increasingly prevalent. Although swir ling initially occurred in the 1970' s and resurfaced in the 1980's the swirling enrollment pattern is considered a new phenomenon due to increased participation (Sima et al., 2003; Madonna, 1976; de los Santos & Wright, 1990; McCormick, 2003).

PAGE 126

118 Increased participation in the swi rling transfer pattern created a renewed interest in studying the phenomenon. However, the research conducted was limited to quantitative interpretations of historical data. The data postulated potential reasons for swirling, domina nt transfer patterns among swirlers, and trends associated with swirling. The purpose of this research was to utilize a qualitative research method to investigate the phenomenon of swirling. The study was designed to explore the enrollment patterns of gra duating seniors at a four year institution to uncover the reason students swirl ed characteristics of swirlers, and outcomes as sociated with swirling. The use of qualitative research methods allowed the researcher to expand the body of knowledge on swirlin g, not by replication, but through unique research. The researcher empl oyed a complementary sel e ctio n of methods for this study A heuristic phenomenological approach grounded in transformational learning theory enhanced with descriptive data was selected to provide insight on the swirling phenomenon. The interview data obtained from the participants enabled the researcher to compare and contrast prior research on swirlers and transfer students.

PAGE 127

119 Overview Swirlers are a unique population of students. The refore, to study a group of student who participated in the phenomenon, a phenomenological approach was implemented. An interview comprised of six questions was administered via an online blog. The blog based interview employed a private asynchronous WordPress.org blo g hosted on www.swirling2010.com. The Registrar's Office provided initial access to the research participants. Of the 19 student s who elected to participate, 16 students completed the study. One of the participants who withdrew partially completed the interview providing a response to two questions for analysis purposes. The transcripts of 17 of the 19 participants were also analyzed for time to degree. Data obtai ned from the interview were analyzed through various methods, which included a constant comparative analysis and data triangulation. After an evaluation of the data the researcher met with an external reviewer to collaborate on concise and consistent themes asso ciated with swirling. The interview data produced s ix prevalent them es and an interpretation of changes in the participant's frame of reference

PAGE 128

120 The Registrar's Office also provided historical data that allowed the researcher to calculate time to degree for students who appl ied for fall 2010 graduation. The data provided the initial date of entry into higher education for each of the students who applied for graduation for the fall semester of 2010. The applicants were separated based on their student type: swirler, native, dipper, and transfer students. All data were reviewed in reference to the three research questions. 1) Why do students swirl? 2) What is the relationship between swirling and time to degree completion? 3) What outcomes are associated with students who participated in multiple institutional tra nsfer process? Data obtained from the blog based interview questions and transcript analysis provided information on each of the research questions However additional data necessary to answer the second question were provided by the Registrar's Office and tabulated by the researcher. Conclusion A n analysis of the interview data reveale d the demographics and characteristics of the participant population. The comparative analysis

PAGE 129

121 and data triangu lation, along with the researcher s experience and previous research identified both congruencies and discrepancies. The characteristics of the participants encompassed ethnicity, age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES). Ethnicity. The researcher used the U.S. Ce nsus definition of ethnicity which allowed for the most consistent definition of Black, White, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander. The data on ethnicity was self disclosed by the participants. The researcher found that 68 % of th e participants were reportedly W hite while Hispanics accounted for 16 % of the population. None of the participants report ed being of any other ethnicity and were classified as other. These findings were consistent with the majority of the research, which stated minorities, are less likely to participate in the s wirl ing process (Lee & Frank, 1990; LeBard, 1999 ; Gao et al., 2002). Kearney et al, (1995) also contended that white students participated in swirling more often than their minority counterparts. In contrast, LeBard ( 1999) suggested Asian American students were the second ethnicity most likely to swirl. The research subjects did not represent the same demographic distribution as Le Bard's (1999) findings since the Hispanic participants were the second largest group of s wirlers However, due to the limited number of participants and the

PAGE 130

122 undisclosed ethnicity of three participants, the demographic distribution is partially unknown Age. Age appeared to be a factor among participants. The data confirmed the majority of the participants, 61% were 19 29 years old. The remaining 39% fell within the 30 49 and 50 59 age range at 34% and 5% respectively. These findings were consistent with previous research on the age of swirlers. Both studies conducted by LeBard (1999) and Kearney et al. (1995) concluded that younger students, under the age of 30, were more likely to participate in the swirling enrollment pattern. Gender. Interview data that revealed 63 % of the participants were female while males accounted for 37% of the population Although the data was similar to the overall population of swirlers, with 61% of the population female and 39% male the findings were in direct contrast to the majority of previous research, which surmised that men swirled more often than women (Lee & Frank, 1990 ; Kearney et al. 1995 ; Rab 2004 ). Conversely, the research findings support ed a study revisited by Goldrick Rab (2006). The revisited study discovered that women were more likely to participate in the swirling enrollment pattern ( Go ldrick Rab, 2006) Perhaps the shift in gender was due to

PAGE 131

123 persistence. LeBard (1999) argued that females were more likely to persist through graduation than males. Socioeconomic s tatus. Socioeconomic status (SES) was inferred based on the participant's responses to the first two interview question. The responses reported information on the participant's family life, childhood, extracurricular activ ities, and employment status. The employment status for each participan t varied throughout his or her academic career. Full time employment during their first enrollment in college was not required for many participants if they lived at home with their parents. Meanwhile, other participants moved away for college and employm ent became an important factor for survival. Participants recounted several dif ferent employment needs at different periods in their life. The ability of the participant's parents to supplement their college expenses (i.e. tuitio n, housing costs) was taken into consideration as the participants were divided among the three SES levels. The SES of the participants may have fluctuated during their academic c areer, but their SES was described based on the most current information submitted at the time of the st udy. Participants from a lower SES comprised 23.5% of the study; 53% of the participants were found to be from a middle SES, and

PAGE 132

124 23.5% of the participants were coded upper SES. Socioeconomic status alone is not an indicator of swirling. Instead, Goldrick R ab (2006) suggests SES is a factor for predicting transfer patterns among swirlers. Students from lower SES backg r ounds were predicted to participate in traditional and reverse transfers, due to community college being their en try point into higher education (Goldrick Rab, 2 006). The data obtained in this study do not support this conclusion. The data revealed 34.4 % participation in reverse transfer for both upper and lower SES. An enhanced review of the data, in relation to initial institution, fur ther showed all of the upper SES participants who participated in reverse transfer began at a four year institution; in direct contrast to their lower SES counterparts where 50% of the participants initially attended a 2 year institution. When analyzed ba sed on initial entry in to educ ation, the data revealed that 7 5% of lower SES participants experienc ed a two year institution as their entry point into higher education. Conversely, 60% of upper SES entered higher education at a four year institution. The middle SES was nearly equally split between a two year and four year entry point, 43% and 57% respectively. The current research findings were consistent with previous research, which found that students

PAGE 133

125 from upper SES background we disproportionately more likely to enter higher education at a four year institution than students from lower SES backgrounds. Characteristics of blog p articipants. The unique use of a blog as a research tool for this research study warrants an evaluation of the participants as i t pertains to typical bloggers. The age demographics of the participants were congruent with the research on Internet usage. Rainey (2010) determined that Internet use was espec ially prevalent among 1 8 29 year olds, since 93% of that population use the Internet Research by Snorgrass ( 2009) found that 86% of college students frequented the Internet while the Internet has only been frequented by 59% of the general population. That implies that college aged students are more likely to use online services than any other adult age group. The data obtained from this research substantiated previous research on Internet usage. An evaluation of the data received from 18 participants found an unequal distribution in age among participants because 61% of the pa rticipants were in the 19 29 categor y and 39% of the participants were in the 30 and over category

PAGE 134

126 The two female students who withdrew prior to answering any of the blog based interview questions were not traditional aged college student s One participant was 45 and the other was 55. Both participants experienced difficulty accessing the blo g thereby forcing the researcher to send them extended step by step directions on how to access their personal blog page. Email responses disclosed the frust ration each woman experience d as they attempted to access t he blog. Neither participant was able to successfully engage in the interview process. One participant attempted to login to the blog, but after experiencing difficulty; she blamed her inability t o complete on coursework and time con s traints. The second participant was unable to login to the blog even after the researcher sent her several detailed emails on how to login. Instead, she proclaimed the site to be poorly organized and difficult to navig ate. She further contended that her experience with the blog site was consistent with her overa ll perspective of USF. In her opinion, the University was unorganized and insensitive to the needs of older returning students. The demographic data supplied by the participants provided a rare opportunity to obtain direct data versus historical data. An overview of the data found the data consistent with the majority of

PAGE 135

127 research on transfer students applied to swirling students. Gender d istribution contradicted older research, but the most current research on swirling is consistent with the data obtained in this study. Themes. Data obtained from the interview were, triangulated, comparatively analyzed, coded, and organized using Atlas Ti software. The data under went several iterations of coding and evaluation prior to the em ergence of six prevalent themes for reasons for swirling : search for perspective, academic issues, moved/relocated, health concerns, financial difficulty and completion The search for perspe ctive theme included self discovery, reassessment of goals, intention transfer, and institutional dissatisfaction. Although many participants noted dissatisfaction with their insti tution, few of them left primarily due to dissatisfaction. Cope & Hanna h ( 1 9 75) reported that student s took time out to experience life and to reassess t heir goals. Approximately 56 % of the participants attributed their transfer to institutional dissatisfaction, self discovery, goal reassessment, and intentional transfer. One participan t admitted she attended a community college only to increase her grade point average to USF minimum standards. While the researcher was employed in the Office of Admission s at USF, academically dismissed students were encouraged to attend a local

PAGE 136

128 two year institution to obtain a 2.0 minimum grade point average if their goal was to enroll at USF, re enroll at USF or attend another public four year state institution. According to Accent on Learning: Undergraduate Catalog of the University of South Florida ( 2010 20 11 ) A student who attends another college or university during academic dismissal will be classified as a transfer student and readmission will be based on the total record accumulated from all colleges and universities attended . For those with 30 to 59 hours, USF will require a 3.00 transfer GPA, again based on data related to transfer student success in the classroom. For other transfers with 60+ hours (including Florida College System transfers without an A.A. or A.S. degree), USF S t. Petersburg, USF Sarasota/Manatee and USF Polytechnic will continue to consider applicants with a 2.00 transfer GPA, while USF Tampa now will require a 2.75 transfer GPA.. As these changes in transfer criteria are implemented, USF will continue to assist transfer students in their efforts to identify the best academic fit within the USF system (p. 15 & 53) A student who left a four year institution attended a two year institution to raise his/her grade point average then returned to another four year institution would have participated in a reverse transfer and traditional transfer pattern and would be considered a swirler Townsend & Dever (1999) found student who experienced academic difficulty at a four year institutio n, improved their grade s while they attended community college and enjoyed improved results when they returned to a four year institution.

PAGE 137

129 Academic issues were considered forced participation, since the student was forced to leave the institution and enroll in a different institution due to grades (Cope & Hannah, 1975; Hagendorn & Castro, 1999) Poor academic performance cont ributed to 44 % of the participants transfer overall. Additionally academic difficulty accounted for 27% of reverse transfer s and 11% of lateral transfers. Bach et al. (1999A) contended that swirling manifested in the form of reverse transf err ing since few students actually participa ted in reverse transfer as a single incident as their initial intent was to obtain a four year d egree. This was evident by the participant described above. The majority of the research found on academ ics as a reason for transfer was associated with reverse trans fers. Incident ally, the primary reason the participants engaged in the reverse transfer e nrol lment pattern was due to a move or relocation. Approximately 63 % of participants reported moving or relocating as the reason for transferring to a new institution. According to Adelman (2003 b ), 42.5 million people moved in 1995 96, while in 1999 2000 43.4 Million people moved. In some cases participant moves were voluntary, but many were involuntary. Participants who voluntarily moved moved to be with their friends, family, or other loved ones. On the other hand involuntary

PAGE 138

130 moves included the respon se to militar y orders to relocate. The research on transfer did not address student movement in terms of student relocation. Instead Cope & Hannah (1975) noted movement patterns among students who followed a loved one or homesickness. Homesickness can lead to depression and other health related issues therefore it was classified as a health concern. The h ealth concerns theme entails student health, health of family members, homesickness, depression, and drug use. Health concerns were reported as a reason fo r swirling among 38 % of the participants. The se participants experienced issues with personal illness, parental health, as well as personal and family related drug abuse. Similarly, Johnson (2006) suggested emotions like immaturity, homesickness, and the irresponsible use of substances, as a reason for transfer. Thus, the research supported previous findings. Financial difficulty characterized 50 % of the participant's reaso ns for swirling. According to researchers, financial issues were the reason for the majority of reverse transfers Townsend & Wilson (2009) postulated students chose to attend two year college for a reduction in tuition costs. Interestingly, financial dif ficulty was not prevalent among reverse transfers in this study yet the theme dominated the lateral

PAGE 139

131 transfer enrol lm ent pattern. The researcher found that in some cases, participants stopped out of school to work and although the participants may not hav e re entered at the same institution, they re entered on the same two year or four year level. Since withdrawing fr om school for financial reason s wa s a voluntary decision in lieu of being asked to leave by the institution fina ncial difficulty was considered voluntary participation (DeJardins et al. 2002;Whiteside & Mentz, 2003). Cope & Hannah (1975) also concluded that students w ho left voluntarily experienced higher grades than students who remained enrolled indicating voluntary transfers were not related to grades like forced transfers. Completion was found to be the primary reason participants engaged in the traditional transfer enrollment pattern. However, in some cases, the traditional enrollment pattern was not necessarily traditional. S everal participants completed certificate program s at non traditional proprietary institution or received credit s for a completed military training program. Participants assigned this code due to matriculation from their third institution enrolled in USF after graduation. C ompletion accounted for 56 % of transfers associated with swirling.

PAGE 140

132 Transformational l earning. The majority of participants experienced a change in frame of reference based on their enrollment patterns. Pa r ticipants were instructed to re flect on their entire academic careers and discuss the positive and negative aspects. The reflections were overwhelming positive, which was in direct contrast with the many of the responses to why the students participated in the transfer process. Partici pants noted their change in point of view with comments about learning from pas t experiences. They often provided negative accounts of the events, yet a positive reflection illustrated a change in reference. Even when participants experienced credit transferability issues, they still provided a somewhat positive reflection. Although many participants experienced credit transferability issues, f ew participants admitted a delay in time to degree. Several confi rmed they had exceeded their expected time frame for graduation by a semester, but the participants who e xperienced an extended delay in time to degree did not recognize the delay. The participants adjusted their frame of reference with each transfer and t herefore adjusted their expectation on time to degree The data obtained by interviewing USF students who applied for graduation in the fall of 2010 were overwhelmingly insightful. The

PAGE 141

133 majority of the data confi rmed previous research findings, while contra dicting others. The data also revealed additional reasons for why students participated in swirling enrollment patterns Voluntary relocation, forced relocation, and the search for perspective uncharacteristically dominated the reasons students swirled, wh ile the majority of the research focused on financial, social, and academic issues. Implications and Recommendations for Future Research In 2005, Adelman surmised that nearly 60% of traditional aged college students attended more tha n one institution. Likewise, Berkner et al. (2007) noted over 40% of students enrolled in higher education in 2003 experienced at least one transfer. Based on the data obtained from the Registrar's Office, 90% of the students who applied for graduation attended at least one institution prior to enrolling at USF. The combination of transfer students and swirler students took an average of 8.8 years to complete their degrees compared to the 4.6 years it took for USF, native and dippers to complete. The data are consistent wit h the research that found swirlers experience longer time to degree completion times than single transfer, dipper, and native students. A review of the participant's transcripts concluded the delay was due to stop outs and credit

PAGE 142

134 transferability issues ass ociated with multiple transfers. Many participants were unable to transfer their entire academic catalog of courses. T he students who experienced the most issues associated with institutional transfers were students who transferred into Florida from an out of state institution. Florida has a distinctive educational system. The State of Florida has implemented four policies to facilitate transfer among universities and colleges in the state. Florida has a statewide articulation policy, statewide common cour se numbering system, and a FACTS system. The statewide articulation policy provides regulations on student transfer for community colleges in the 2+2, traditional transfer pattern, and the agreement with Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (I CUF). The 2+2 articulation agreement allows students to obtain an AA or AS degree from a public community college and gain automatic admission to a state university. The studen t is not guaranteed entrance into the major of his/her choice, but admission to the university is guaranteed (Florida Department of Education, 2010) This is an ideal situation for students who are seeking a bachelor's degree, but who may not have been able to meet the university's minimum standards.

PAGE 143

135 According to the Florida Department of Education (n.d) t o further ease bachelor's degree attainment, community colleges in Florida are converting to state colleges. Community colleges are becoming state institutions to offer bachelor's degrees in critical shortage area like educat ion and nursing. The new institutions will now offer Bachelor of Science (BS) and Bachelor of Applied Science (BAS) degrees. For students who seek a bachelor's degree in an area of critical need, attendance at a state college may allow them to experience t he convenience of location, the low tuition costs, and smaller college environment of a community college. The conversion of community colleges to state colleges should also reduce transfer for students enrolled in bachelors program, since the need to tran sfer after completing the associate degree has been eliminated. The State also has an agreement with ICUF. The Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida is a consortium of private schools that established an articulation agreement with the State of Florida for credit transferability to facilitate transfer for students who transfer among private colleges and state institutions (Articulation Agreement, 2006) Private institutions can be prestigious, but also tend to be costly. The participants in this study who attended private schools transferred due to the financial burden. Although the participants

PAGE 144

136 experienced a reduction in their financial obligations, they also experienced an issue with credit transferability. In some cases, the courses transferred credit wise, but the courses did not meet Florida's educational requirements (i.e. Gordon Rule, Exit Requirements) thereby forcing the student t o retake the class to meet the S tate's requirements. In 1970's, the State of Florida created a statewide course numbering system. The system provides a list of courses that are transferable among state institutions because all of the state and ICUF institutions courses are assigned the same designation and the course content remains consistent with each course (Fl orida Department of Education, 2010) For example, Freshman English is coded ENC 1101 and bears the same course content at all state and ICUF institutions. Therefore, ENC 1101 is acceptable at all institutions as a freshman English course. Several non trad itional proprietary institutions like Everest University and Keiser University have also adopted the common course numbering system. The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education noted the general education block of common courses obtained at an ins titution of higher education is transferrable to almost any institution of education in Florida since the

PAGE 145

137 majority of the ICUF institutions voluntarily agreed to accept the transfer credit ( Wellman, 2002) Florida also offers an online system to assist student s with transfer. Students can map out credit transferability and degree completion requirements with Florida Academic Counseling and Tracking for Students ( FACTS ) The FACTS program is a to ol provided by the state for students to review credit transferability prior to transferring to the next institution. The students login to the system, follow a few basic steps, and are able to view the placement of transfer credits in the degree progr am of their choice while also viewing the balance of the requirements necessary to complete the degree. The unique educational system in Florida creates an environment that facilitates transfer among institutions within Florida. The ease in which students can transfer may promote transfer. Therefore the researcher recommends a review of transfer and swirler students in states that do not offer similar opportuniti es to transfer among institutions, perhaps in a state with a reduced number of articulation ag reements Although the Florida system clearly assists students within the state, out of state transfers may experience difficulty. The participants

PAGE 146

138 who attempted to transfer credit to a Florida school experience difficulty with course placement. As previo usly mentioned the credits were acceptable for general institutional credit but did not meet Florida standards in certain areas For example one participant who completed a College Algebra course at an out of state institution experienced a credit transferability issue The credits were accepted, but the math class was determined to be unacceptable in reference to meeting the State's math requirement Consequently, the student had to retake the College Algebra course. Therefore t he math class was a cceptable but not in a manner beneficial to the student. The researcher suggests a creating a national database similar to Florida's common course numbering system. Creating a national database of transferable courses will enable the students who enroll in higher education with the intent to transfer to take certain courses with guaranteed acceptability at their next institution. The creation of this system could be as simple as compiling a series of articulation agreements created by individual states in one location. Day (2005) indicated that although the transfer policies across the nation require improvements, 80% of the states have established articulation agreements. Additionally, 23 states with State Boards of Higher Education have common general education core curricula, and some

PAGE 147

139 accompany common course numbering systems (Day, 2005). Therefore, the foundation for a nationwide common course numbering system is available. The system w ill enable student s to transfer within the system of higher education without regard to location. A FACTS style database could host the common course numbering sy stem. The system would allow student s to import their current courses and analyze the potentia l outcomes associated with transferring to a different institution. Since retention and graduation rates are commonly used to measure institutional accountability and success, many institutions rely on high retention and graduation rates for funding (Code y, Cade, & King, 1998). Stud ents who enroll in institutions and then leave those institutions typically reduce the retention and graduation rates. The refore, the researcher also recommends researching student intentions upon college enrollment In one case in this study a participant enrolled in a two year institution to improve her grade point average then advance to a 4 year institution. The participant's intention was to stop in, complete a semester of course s then move on to bachelor's degree attainment. Perhaps when a student discloses his/her intent to transfer in the beginning of the enrollment process,

PAGE 148

140 the institution would be eligible to receive an accountability waiver. If the student transfers prior t o degree completion, the institution would be able to invoke the accountability waiver. The accountability waiver would remove the requirement for the institution to be accountable for retaini ng the student until graduation and remove the student from the graduation rate calculation. Yet, if the student decides to remain, the institution would not have to utilize the waiver. The availabili ty of the accountability waiver would allow i nstitutions to openly assist students with transfer instead of focusing on the loss of the student as it pertains to accoun tability and graduation rates. Sullivan (2005) found planned transfers easier for students, since they can create a curriculum of courses that would compliment the requirements for degree completion at the in stitution where they plan to obtain their academic credentials. Accurate and appropriate advising for students who intend to transfer would increase successful credit transferability. The researcher agrees with Sturtz (2006) "If we are to embrace this ne w multiple institution paradigm of student attendance, we must alter the way we count, track, and measure student access, progress, and success (p. 157) Additional research on the swirling phenomenon is required to obtain a clear understanding of the fac tors

PAGE 149

141 associated with multiple institutional transfers. The new research may enable policy changes and the creation of new systems necessary to ensure unilateral success for all college students regardless of enrollment pattern. Summary Enrollment patterns have evolved over time. Attending a single four year institution after high school graduation has become the less traditional pathway through higher education. Students who enrolled in community college, then decided to pursue a bachelo r's degree par ticipate in a traditional transfer. Since the traditional transfer, several enrollment patterns have emerged: reverse transfer, lateral transfer and swirling. Swirling is comprised of several enrollment pathways and has become a popular tran sfer pattern. Sturtz (2005) maintains that swirling "is not a leakage in the pipeline to educational attainment. It promotes access because it provides many points of entry as well as educational options to students (p. 158) Swirling is an option many students have elected to embrace. S wirling s tudent s may have an opportunity to move to new states, enroll in a new college, and experience life in different ways. This research found that the search for perspective, relocation, and

PAGE 150

142 academic issues were the most common reasons student's swirled. Additional reasons for student swirl were financial difficulty, health concerns, and graduation/completion. However, the outcomes associated with swirling are not always positive. If swirlers do not have a viable pla n, they may find themselves transferring fewer credit s or duplicating previous coursework in order to complete the desired degree. Often issues with credit transferability can lead to a delay in time to degree as illustrated by the participants in this study as we ll as the time to degree calculations for the graduate applicants. The delay in time to degree was prevalent regardless of the higher education point of entry. The average degree completion time for two year entrants was equivalent to the degree completion time for four year entrants. Despite any negative outcomes, students continue to participate in swirling at an increased rate. Institutions can assist student with the transfer process to facilitate transfer and provide assistance with calc ul ating credit transferability in advance. Due to the nature of student mobility, the swirling enrollment pattern appears to be here to st ay Since the student's goal is to graduate and the institutions goal is to pr ovide the pathway to graduation, students and institutions should

PAGE 151

143 work together to create the optimal, most beneficial process for both entities.

PAGE 152

144 References University of South Florida. (2010 2011). Accent on learning: Undergraduate catalog of the University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://www.ugs.usf.edu/pdf/cat1011/20102011.pdf Adelman, C. (1988). Transfer rates and the going mythologies. Change, 20 (1), 38 41. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns and bachelor's degree attainment. Wash ington, DC.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Adelman, C. (2003 a July). Selected data on urbanicity and generational status of traditional age students who begin their postsecondary careers in community colle ge Paper presented at the National Transfer Conference in Tampa, FL. Adelman, C. (2003b). Beyond transfer: Many dimensions Paper presented at the National Transfer Conference in Tampa, FL.

PAGE 153

145 Adelman, C. (2005). Moving into town and moving o n: The community college in the lives of t raditiona l a ge Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/comcollege/movingin tot own.pdf Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox r e visited: Paths to d egree completion from high school through c ollege. Washington, DC.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/index .html Allen, J., Robbins, S., Casillas, A., & Oh, I. (2008). Third year college retention and t ransfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research of Higher Education 49, 647 664. Anfara, Jr., V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher 31(7), 28 38.

PAGE 154

146 Articulation agreement between the i ndependen t c olleges and u niversities of Florida and the Florida division of community colleges and workforce education. (2006). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education Of fice of Articulation Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/articulation/pdf/ICUF_Agreement.pdf Auerbach, C. F. & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding a nd analysis. New York, New York : University Press. Bach, S. K., Banks, M. A., Blanchard, D. K., Kinnick, M. K., Ricks, M. F., Stoering, J. M. (1999 a May). Case studies in transfer attendance within an urban postsecondary environment. Paper presented at the Thirty Ninth Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research in Seattle, Washington. Bach, S. K., Banks, M. T., Kinnick, M. K., Ricks, M. F., Stoering, J. M., & Walleri, R. D. (1999 b ). Reverse transfer students in an ur ban post secondary system in Oregon. New Directions for Community Colleges 106, 47 56. Bach, S. K., Banks, M. T., Kinnick, M. K., Ricks, M. F., Stoering, J. M., & Walleri, R. D. (2000). Student attendance patterns and performance in an urban postsecondary environment. Research in Higher Education, 41 (3), 315 330.

PAGE 155

147 Bahr, P. (2009). College hoping: Exploring the occurrence, frequency, and consequences of lateral tran sfer. Community College Review 36 (4), 271 298. Bailey, D. S. (2003). Swirling' changes to the traditional student path. Monitor on Psychology 34(11), 36 38. Barlow, A. (2007). The rise of the blogosphere Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Barton, P. E. (1997). Toward inequality: Disturbing trends in higher education Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ. ED415276. Bausch, P., Haughey, M., & Hourihan, M. (2002). We blog: Publishing online with weblogs New York; NY: John Wiley & Sons. Berkner, L., He, S., Mason, M., & Wheeless, S. (2007). Persistence and attainment of 2003 04 beginning postsecondary students: After three years (first look) NCES 2007 169 Jessup, MD: U. S. Department of Education. Bers, T. (2001). Understanding transfer : A collaborative community college and research project. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College 8 (2), 93 105.

PAGE 156

148 Boughan, K. (2001). Closing the transfer data gap: Using national student clearinghouse data in community college outcomes rese arch. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 8 (2), 107 116. Bowen, W. G. & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cardenas, J. (200 7 ). Portland State University Portland, OR: New Student Programs Portland State University. Caruso, J. & Salaway, G. (2007) The ECAR s tudy of undergraduate students and information t echnology Boulder, CO: Educase Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.csplacement.com/downloads/ECAR ITskliissstudy.pdf Cejda, B. D. (1999). The r ole of the community college in baccalaureate attainment at a private liberal arts c ollege. Community College Review 27(1), 1 12. Chenail, R. (2008). Qualitative researchers in the blogosphere: Using blogs as diaries and data. The Weekly Qualitative Report 1 (11), 72 77.

PAGE 157

149 Christie, R. & Hutcheson, P. (2003). Net effects of institutional type on baccalaureate degree attainment of "tra ditional" students. Community College Review 31 (2), 1 20. City Colleges of Chicago. (2003). University students now transferring in a reverse pattern to city colleges of Chicago Retrieved from http://www.ccc.edu/district/aboutccc/news/reverse_transfer_05 21 03.html Codey, L. R., Cade, A. J., & King. W. (1998). Focusing on higher education outcomes: The third annual statewide accountability report. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Commission on Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428608) Cody, R. P., & Smith, J. K. (1997). Applied statistics and the SAS programming language (4 th ed.). New York New York : North Holland. Cohen, A. M. (2003). The communit y college and the path to the baccalaureate. Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.4.03. Center for Studies in Higher Education. Berkley, CA: University of California. Cohen, A. M. & Brawer, F. B. (1996). The American community college (3 rd ed.). San Francisco CA : Jossey Bass.

PAGE 158

150 Colagross, G. & Holland, P. (2001, October). Transfer student or reverse transfer students: what is the significance for 2 and 4 year institutions Paper complied for a collaborative presentation for Northwest Shoals Community College and the University of North Alabama. Committee on the Transfer Student Experience. (2004). Office of the Provost Final Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Cope, R. & Hannah, W. (1975). Revolving college doors: The causes and consequences of dropping out, stoping out, and transf erring. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cor rigan, M. E. (2003). Beyond access: Persistence c hallenges and the diversity of lo w income s tudents. New Directions for Higher Education 2003 (121), 25 34. Counting the reverse transfer student. (1985) ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges, & National Institute of Education Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED261757) Cranton, P (2006). Understanding & p ro moting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sag e.

PAGE 159

151 Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds ), Handbooks of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209 240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. College credit mobility: Can transfer of credit policies be improved? Hearings before the Committee on Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on 21 st century competitiveness 109 th Cong. (2005)(testimony of Jerome H. Sullivan) College credit mobility: Can transfer of credit p olicies be improved? Hearings before the Committee on Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on 21 st century competitiveness 109th Cong. (2005) (t estimony of Phillip R. Day, Jr. ). d e los Santos, A. & Wright, I. (1990). Maricopa's s wirling students: Earning one third of Arizona state's bachelor's degrees. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 60 (6), 32 34. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.)(1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A. & McCall, B. P. (2002). Simulating the longitudinal effects of changes in financial aid on student departure from college. Journal of Human Resources 37(3), 653 679.

PAGE 160

152 Douglass, R. T., Little, M. & Smith, J. W. (2006). Building o nline c ommunities Berkeley, CA: Apress. Duggan, M. H. & Pickering, J.W. (2008). Barriers to transfer student academic success and retention. Journal of College Student Retention 9 (4), 437 459. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28 1 11. Fenollar, P., Roman, S., & Cuestas, P. (2007). University students' acade mic performance: An inte grative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4), 873 891. Florida Atlantic University. (1999). Reverse transfer student study. Office of Institutional Effectiveness. Florida Department of Education. (n.d.). Bachelor's Degree. Retri eved From http://www.fldoe.org/cc/students/bach_degree.asp Garland, W. A. (2009). Blogging out of debt: An observational netnography (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (AAT 3387340)

PAGE 161

153 Gao, H., Hughes, W. W., O'Rear, M. R., & Fendley Jr., W. R. (2002, June). Developing structural equation models to determine factors contributing to student graduation and retention: Are there differences for native students and transfers? Paper presented at the 43 rd Annual Research Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. Toronto, Ontario: Canada. Glass, G. V. & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology Boston M assachusetts : Allyn and Bacon. Goldrick Rab, S. (2006). Following their every move: An investigation of social class differences in college pathways. Sociology of Education 79(1), 61 79. Goldrick Rab, S. & Pfeffer, F. T. (2009). Beyond access: Explaining Socioeconomic differences in college transfer. Sociology of Education 82(2), 101 125. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation de signs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (3), 255 274. Hagedorn, L.S., & Castro, C.R. (1999) Paradoxes: California's experience with reverse transfer students. In B. Townsend (Ed.). The Transfer Swirl: Trends and Issues New Directions for Community Colleges Number 106.

PAGE 162

154 Hearn J. C. (1992). Emerging variations in postsecondary attendance patterns: An investigation of part time, delayed and nondegree enrollment, Research in Higher Education 33 (6) 657 687. Hillman, N., Lum, T., Hossler, D. (2008). Understanding Indiana's reverse transfer students: A case study in institutional research. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 32(2), 113 134. Johnson, T. (Ed.) (2006). Traveling successfully on the community college pathway The research and findings of the transfer and retention of urban community college students (TRUCCS) project Los Angeles, CA: Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Kearney, G., Townsend, B. K., & Kearney, T. J. (1995). Multiple tran sfer students in a public urban university: Background characteristics and institutional movements. Research in Higher Education, 36 (3), 323 345. Kiser, A. & Price, L. (2008). The persistence of college students from their freshman to sophomore year. Journal of College Student Retention 9(4), 421 436.

PAGE 163

155 Kozeracki, C. A. (2001). Studying transfer students: Designs and methodological challenges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 106 61 75. Kozinets, R. (2002). The field behind the screen using netnography. Journal of Marketing Research 39(1), 61 72. Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. New Directions for Community Colleges, 5 13. Langford, B. E., Schoerfeld, G., & Pizzo, G. ( 2002). Nominal grouping sessions versus focus groups. Qualitative Market Research, 5 (1), 58 70. LeBard, C. (1999). Sources and information on the scope and impact of reverse transfers. New Directions for Community Colleges, 106 85 92. Lee, V. E. & Frank, K. A. (1990). Students' characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two year to four year colleges. Sociology of Education 63(3), 178 193. Lohnes, S. C. (2008). Being net gen: Exploring the role of technology in college student's social identity en actments on campus (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (AAT 3348581)

PAGE 164

156 Longanecker, D. A., & Blanco, C. D. (2003). Public policy implications of changing student attendance patterns. New Directions for Higher Education, 121, 51 68. Madonna, L. A. (1976 ). The student flow s ystem Retrieved from ERIC database. ( ED125613 ) Marti, C. N. (2007). Latent post secondary persistence pathways: Educational pathways in American two year college. Research in Higher Education 49(4), 317 336. Maxwell, W. E., Hagedorn, L. S., Brocato, P., Moon, H. S. & Perrakis, A. (2001). The community college shuffle: Student patterns of multiple enrollments Unpublished manuscript submitted for a conference. McCormick, A. C. (2003). Swirling and double dipping: New patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 121 13 24. Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation San Francisco, C A: Jossey Bass. Mezirow, J. (E d.). (2000). Learning as transformation San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

PAGE 165

157 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Nilsson, S. (2003). The function of language to facilitate and maintain social networks in research weblogs Unpublished D Essay for Umea universitet Englsk spakvetenskap. Okun, M. A., Karoly, P., Martin, J. L., & Bensloff, A. (2009). Distinguishing between exogenous and endogenous intent to transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention 10 (4), 507 524. Oregon University System. (2000). Academic affairs reports: Students who transfer between Oregon community colleges and Ore gon university system institutions: What the data say Oregon: Author. Ottinger, C. (1991). College going, p ersistence and c ompletion patterns in higher e ducation: W hat do we k now? Washington, D.C: Division of Policy & Research American Council on Educa tion.

PAGE 166

158 Palmer, J. C. (2003). What do we know about student transfer? An overview. General Education in an age of student mobility Association of American Colleges and Universities: Washington, DC. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Racial differences in factors a ssociated with bachelor's degree completion: A nine year follow up. Research in Higher Education 23(4), 351 373. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Peter, K. & Cataldi E. F. (2005). The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions NCES 2005 157. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.edu.gov/pubs200 5/2005157.pdf Phelan, D. J. (1999). Institutional and public policy implications of the phenomenon of reverse transfer students. New Directions for Community Colleges, 106, 77 92. Porter, S. R. (1999, June). Assessing transfer and native student performance at four year institutions Paper presented at the Association of Institutional Research 1999 Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA.

PAGE 167

159 Rab, S. (2004). Sw irling students: Putting a new spin on college attrition (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQu est Dissertations and Thesis database. (AAT 3125888). Rainie, L. (2010). Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics Washington, DC: PEW Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Trend Data/whos online.aspx Reverse Transfer student study report. (1999). Florida Atlantic University Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Analysis. Retri eved from http://iea.fau.edu/inst/tran.pdf Rodzvilla, J. (Ed.) (2002). We've got blog: How weblogs are changing our culture Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing. Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative i nterviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Scheider, K. (2008). A qualitative study of five authors of five blogs on training and development (Master's thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and The sis database. (AAT MR45326). Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A dictionary of terms Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

PAGE 168

160 Sima, C. M., Inman, P. S., & Stein, J. P. (2003, June). The influence of multiple institution transfer patterns on undergraduate degree attainment and time to degree. Compendium of abstracts for the second focus on Illinois Education Research Sympo sium. Illinois Research Council, Champaign, IL. Smith, E. J. (2010). Statewide articulation manual. Tallahassee, FL: Of fice of Articulation, Florida Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/articulation/pdf/statewide postsecondary articulation manual.pdf Snorgrass, J. A. (2009). College student's perceptions of public service announcements across broadcast, social, and mobile media (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Thesis database. (AAT 3379848). Strampel, K. & Oliver, R (2008). We've thrown away pens, but are they learning? Using blogs in higher education Paper presented at the proceedings ascilite Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Sturtz, A. J. (2006). The multiple dimensions of student swirl. Journal of Applied Resear ch in the Community College 12 (2), 151 158.

PAGE 169

161 Suzuki, R. (2004). Diaries as introspective research tools: From Ashton Warner to blogs. TESL EJ Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 8(1), 1 8. Retrieved from http://www.tesl ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume8/ej29/ej29int/ Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: Vol. 46. Ap plied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.).(2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Townsend, B. K. (1999 April ). Telling the community college s tory: The transfer f unction Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American A ssociation of Community College, Nashville, TN. Townsend, B. K., & Dever, J. T. (1999). What do we know about reverse transfer students? New Directions for Community Colle ges, 106 5 14 Townsend, B., & Wilson, K. (2009). The academic and social integration of persisting community college transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention 10(4), 405 423.

PAGE 170

162 USF System Facts 2009 10 (2009). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://www.usf.edu/pdfs/USF_PocketFacts.pdf Wellman, J. V. (2002). State policy and community college Baccalaureate transfer. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education Policy Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education. ED468890. Welsh, J. F., & Kjorlien, C. (2001). State support for institutional tran sfer and articulation: The impact of databases and information systems. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 313 333. Whiteside, R. & Mentz, G. (2003). Winds of change and enrollment management: Edu trends, college access, and economic dynamics. Strategic Enrollment Management 3 (5), 1 2 8 10. Yang, X., Brown, K. J., & Brown, J. K. (2008, April). Enrollment patterns and completion sta tus: Students in North Carolina public postsecondary institutions Paper submitted for the 2008 N CAIR and SCAIR Joint Conference, Asheville, NC. Zamani, E. M. (2001). Institutional responses to barriers to the transfer process. New Directions for Community Colleges, 114 15 24.

PAGE 171

163 Appendices

PAGE 172

164 Appendix A : Blog B ased Interview Questions 1. Please describe yourself and your family. 2. Was employment a factor while you were enrolled in college? 3. What factors contributed to your first transfer or withdrawal f rom school? 4. What factors influenced your transfer from your second institution? 5. What factors influenced your transfer from your third institution? 6. Reflecting on your college experience, from your first college to now, please describe the most positive and negative aspects?

PAGE 173

165 Appendix B : Participation Letter Good Day Fellow Student, Congratulations on your upcoming for graduation! My name is Alytrice Brown and I would like to celebrate your milestone with an opportunity to tell your story by participatin g in an exciting research project! You have acquired a wealth of knowledge throughout your journey to your bachelor's degree. Your perseverance through college is interesting and impressive. Therefore, I would like for you to share some of your experiences with me. I am conducting a blog based interview and I would like for you to share your knowledge and information about your experiences transferring among institutions of higher education. Your participation in this groundbreaking research, titled Swirli ng: An Examination of Time to Degree, Reasons, and Outcomes Associated with Multi Institutional Transfers ( IRB# (Pro00000844) ), would be a wonderful opportunity to potentially influence policy. It may also make a difference for other students who will foll ow the path you have blazed. Only 50 students will be selected for participation in this exciting new research opportunity. As an incentive, at the conclusion of the survey, each participant who completes the survey will be entered into a drawing to win o ne of six $50.00 Best Buy gift cards. If you are interested in participating, please contact me within two weeks of receiving this letter at alr@mail.usf.edu I hope you choose to become one of the limited participants to share your story. Thank you for your consideration! Sincerely, Alytrice Brown

PAGE 174

166 Appendix C : Informed Consent I NFORMED C ONSENT TO P ARTICIPATE IN R ESEARCH Information to Consider Before Taking Part in this Research Study IRB Study # _______________ Researchers at the University of South Florida (USF) study many topics. To do this, we need the help of people who agree to take part in a research study. This form tells you about this research study. We are asking you to take part in a research study that is called: Swirling: An Examination of Time to Degree, Reasons, and Outcomes Associated With Multi institutional Transfers The person who is in charge of this research study is Alytrice Robinson Brown. This person is called t he Principal Investigator. However, other research staff may be involved and can act on behalf of the person in charge. The research will be an online blog based interview, which will take place over a two week period o f time in the Summer or Fall of 201 0. P URPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to Obtain information on swirling from individuals who actually participated in the swirling phenomenon. S TUDY P ROCEDURES If you take part in this study, you will be asked to Provide:

PAGE 175

167 Appendix C (Continued) 1) A detailed description and explanation of the transfer process and any outcomes associated with swirling; 2) A detailed description of yourself and your family; and 3) A transcript release form for a detailed transcript analysis at the en d of the interview. A LTERNATIVES You have the alternative to choose not to participate in this research study. B ENEFITS We don't know if you will get any benefits by taking part in this study. However, each participant who completes the interview process will be entered into a drawing to win one of six $50.00 gift cards to Best Buy. R ISKS OR D ISCOMFORT This research is considered to be minimal risk. That means that the risks associated with this study are the same as what you face every day. There are n o known additional risks to those who take part in this study. C OMPENSATION We will not pay you for the time you volunteer while being in this study. C ONFIDENTIALITY We must keep your study records as confidential as possible. Blog comments will only be viewable by the researcher. Researcher will assign each participant a pseudonym when reporting information obtained from the blog. However, certain people may need to see your study records. By law, anyone who looks at your records must keep them completely confidential. The only people who will be allowed to see these records are: The research team, including the Principal Investigator, study coordinator, research nurses, and all other research staff

PAGE 176

168 Appendix C (Continued) Certain government and university people who need to know more about the study. For example, individuals who provide oversight on this study may need to look at your records. This is done to make sure that we are doing the study in the right way. They also need to make sur e that we are protecting your rights and your safety. These include: o The University of South Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the staff that work for the IRB. Other individuals who work for USF that provide other kinds of oversight may also n eed to look at your records. o The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). We may publish what we learn from this study. If we do, we will not let anyone know your name. We will not publish anything else that would let people know who you are. V OLUNTARY P ARTICIPATION / W ITHDRAWAL You should only take part in this study if you want to volunteer. You should not feel that there is any pressure to take part in the study, to please the investigator or the research staff. You are free to participate in this research or withdraw at any time. There will be no penalty or loss of benefits you are entitled to receive if you stop taking part in this study. Your decision to participate or not to participate will not affect your student status. Q UESTIONS CONCERNS OR COMPLAINTS If you have any questions, concerns or complaints about this study, call Alytrice Robinson Brown at (813) 774 0014. If you have questions about your rights as a participant in this study, general questions, or have complaints, conce rns or issues you want to discuss with someone outside the research, call the Division of Research Integrity and Compliance of the University of South Florida at (813) 974 9343. If you experience an unanticipated problem related to the research call Alytri ce Robinson Brown at (813) 774 0014

PAGE 177

169 Appendix C (Continued) C ONSENT TO T AKE P ART IN THIS R ESEARCH S TUDY It is up to you to decide whether you want to take part in this study. If you want to take part, please sign the form by typing your name below if the following statements are true. I freely give my consent to take part in this study. I understand that typing my name on the lines below I will create an electronic signature indicating that I am agreeing to take part in this research study I have re ceived a copy of this form in an email that I can save for future reference _________________________________ ___________ Signature of Person Taking Part in Study Date _____________________________________________ Printed Name of Person Taking Part in Study S TATEMENT OF P ERSON O BTAINING I NFORMED C ONSENT I have carefully explained to the person taking part in the study what he or she can expect. I hereby certify that when this person electronically signs this form, to the best of my kno wledge, he or she understands: What the study is about. What procedures/interventions/investigational drugs or devices will be used. What the potential benefits might be. What the known risks might be. Signature of Person Obtaining Inform ed Consent Date Alytrice Robinson Brown Printed Name of Person Obtaining Informed Consent

PAGE 178

170 Appendix D: Transcript Request Form Office of University Registrar University of South Florida 4202 E Fowler Ave Tampa, Fl 33620 (813)974 2000 Permission to Release Education Record Information Requested By (Student): Release To (Recipient): Brown Alytrice LAST NAME FIRST NAME LAST NAME FIRST NAME University Of South Florida STUDENT IDENTIFICATI ON NUMBER ORGANIZATION/SCHOOL Pick Up DATE ADDRESS Tampa FL CITY, STATE, ZIP Education record information to be released: Academic Transcripts P urpose of Release: The purpose of this release is to provide transcripts to the researcher for r eview as it pertains to time to degree and descritpive analysis. By typing my name in the box below, as an electronic signature, I give permission for _The University of South Florida_ to release the specified information to the recipient listed above. STUDENT SIGNATURE OFFICE USE ONLY Action taken: Completed Filed Held Other: DATE BY WHOM

PAGE 179

171 Appendix E : Participant Email Good Day Participant, Thank you for your decision to participate in the Swirling: An Examination of Time to Degree, Reasons, and Outcomes Associated with Multi Institutional Transfers study ( IRB# (Pro00000844) )! As a reminder, the research will be conducted as a blog based interview where I will post a series of questions. You are expected to share your knowledge and information about your experiences transferring among institutions o f higher education. Dependent upon your reply to the questions and the response time, the completion of the research may vary. However, it is not expected to extend beyond two weeks from the posting of the initial set of questions. As an incentive, at the conclusion of the survey, each participant who completes the survey will be entered into a drawing to win one of six $50.00 Best Buy gift cards. If you have any questions prior to or during participation, please contact me via phone (813) 774 0014 or by email at alr@mail.usf.edu I look forward to your participation in this study and thank you for choosing sharing your story! Sincerely, Alytrice Brow n

PAGE 180

About the Author Alytrice Robinson Brown entered higher education at the University of South Florida's Tampa Campus, where she earned a Bachelor's of Arts in Psychology. She furthered her education by attending the Sorrell College of Business at Troy State University for a Master's of Science in Business Management, emphasis in Human Resources Management. Brown has been employed in higher education since 1991. She currently works in private proprietary education, however her previous work experience includes public state and public proprietary in stitutions as well. Her research was inspired by a noticeable commonality among the aforementioned three sectors of higher education student retention.


Download Options

Choose Size
Choose file type
Cite this item close


Cras ut cursus ante, a fringilla nunc. Mauris lorem nunc, cursus sit amet enim ac, vehicula vestibulum mi. Mauris viverra nisl vel enim faucibus porta. Praesent sit amet ornare diam, non finibus nulla.


Cras efficitur magna et sapien varius, luctus ullamcorper dolor convallis. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Fusce sit amet justo ut erat laoreet congue sed a ante.


Phasellus ornare in augue eu imperdiet. Donec malesuada sapien ante, at vehicula orci tempor molestie. Proin vitae urna elit. Pellentesque vitae nisi et diam euismod malesuada aliquet non erat.


Nunc fringilla dolor ut dictum placerat. Proin ac neque rutrum, consectetur ligula id, laoreet ligula. Nulla lorem massa, consectetur vitae consequat in, lobortis at dolor. Nunc sed leo odio.