|USFDC Home | USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations||| RSS|
This item is only available as the following downloads:
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.loc.govstandardsmarcxmlschemaMARC21slim.xsd
leader nam 22 Ka 4500
controlfield tag 007 cr-bnu---uuuuu
008 s2011 flu ob 000 0 eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a E14-SFE0004943
Guindon, Kathryn Yvonne.
Evaluating lethal and sub-lethal effects of catch-and-release angling in florida's central gulf coast recreational atlantic tarpon (megalops atlanticus) fishery
h [electronic resource] /
by Kathryn Yvonne Guindon.
[Tampa, Fla] :
b University of South Florida,
Title from PDF of title page.
Document formatted into pages; contains 177 pages.
(Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
Text (Electronic dissertation) in PDF format.
ABSTRACT: Atlantic tarpon are sought after because of their fighting ability on various tackle and support a popular, lucrative and predominantly catch-and-release recreational fishery in Florida. They are not commercially harvested or consumed by the general public, therefore assessing effects of catch-and-release angling on tarpon survival is critical to a sustainable fishery. Tarpon caught on artificial breakaway jig and traditional live bait fishing charters in Boca Grande Pass (n=42) and trips from the recreational fishery of Tampa Bay (n=40) were tagged with ultrasonic transmitters and tracked up to 6 hours immediately following release to estimate post-release mortality. Of the 82 tagged tarpon, 11 suffered mortality as inferred from movement patterns (or lack thereof) or visual confirmation (i.e. shark attacks) which yields a combined total estimated catch-and-release mortality rate of 13% (95% confidence interval: 6-21%). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two estuarine systems. Associations between tarpon mortality and angling duration, handling time, fish length, bait type (artificial versus natural), and hook type (circle versus "J") were not significant. Hook location (foul-hooking) and swimming condition at release were significant factors on tarpon mortality (P<0.05). Shark predation was the primary cause of post-release mortality (64%). Excluding predation, the overall mortality rate was estimated at 5% and attributed to poor handling and irreparable physiological damage from angling. Angling events will cause anaerobic activity resulting in physiological disruptions that may have consequences compromising the health and survival of tarpon. Both adult (mature, >70 pounds, 31.8 kg) and sub-adult (sexually immature, <20 pounds, 9 kg) tarpon support Florida's recreational fishery, so maximizing post-release survival and minimizing sub-lethal stress effects of both size classes are critical to their sustainability. In this study, stress responses after exhaustive exercise (angling) were measured using an array of blood chemistry parameters, including hematocrit, hemoglobin, and plasma glucose, lactate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and cortisol. Angled, adults (n=45) were compared to large tarpon in a resting state (controls, n=6). Angled, sub-adults (n=28) were compared to those in a resting state (n=9). Adult tarpon were then compared to sub-adults to determine any size-related, intra-species variation in stress responses after angling. Finally, because smaller tarpon are logistically easier to handle and may be subjected to prolonged air exposure by anglers for hook removal or photographs, we evaluated the effect of 60 seconds of air exposure with horizontal (n=9) or vertical (n=9) handling out of the water relative to non-air exposed (n=10) fish in angled sub-adult tarpon. Associations and interactions among the blood chemistry responses of tarpon from each treatment to angling duration, handling time, body size and environmental factors related to each capture event were evaluated using a non-parametric, multivariate redundancy analysis. The duration of the angling event had a positive effect on responses of some parameters, and responses were more extreme in adult tarpon than sub-adults. The exception was cortisol which was significantly higher in sub-adults. Environmental parameters were less influential than angling and handling on observed physiological responses. Sub-adults showed no difference in physiological responses among handling treatments with and without air exposure and exhibited no short term mortality. Using appropriate tackle and gear to reduce fight times and handling should help minimize metabolic and acid-base imbalances. Tagging studies coupled with physiology can be a valuable tool for estimating post-release mortality and secondary stress responses of game fish, especially for large species that might be difficult to maintain in floating pens or tanks. Yet adverse effects of catch-and-release angling could also have population level consequences. Future studies should integrate biology and fish physiology to evaluate post-release recovery windows and establish lethal thresholds to provide potential predictive capability of mortality. In general, it appears that sub-adult and adult Atlantic tarpon along the Gulf coast of Florida can recover from physiological disturbances incurred during routine catch-and-release angling events in the recreational fishery when they are released in the absence of large predators. The anglers themselves can play a key role in tarpon conservation.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.
Mann, David A..
x Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Wildlife Conservation Biology, Animal Physiology
t USF Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Evaluating L ethal and S ub L ethal E ffects of C atch and R elease A ngling in F C entral Gulf Coast R ecreational Atlantic T arpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) F ishery by Kathryn Yvonne Guindon A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of t he requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: David Mann, Ph.D. Luiz Barbieri, Ph.D. Roy Crabtree, Ph.D. Ernst Peebles, Ph.D. Joseph Torres, Ph.D. Date of Approval: Nove mber 1, 2010 Keywords: acoustic telemetry, mortality, stress, physiology, air exposure, Copyright 2011, Kathryn Yvonne Guindon
DEDICATION I dedicate this work to the hundreds of volunteer tarpon anglers and professional guides of Florida who supported me through the good, the bad and the ugly to get this accomplished. Without your support and aggravati ng frustrations I might not have been inclined to persevere through this. Your attitudes, comments, camaraderie, consideration and respect help ed me to create an even better product than it would have been without your influence. I have grown and matured beyond what words can describe through my interactions with tarpon and tarpon anglers while doing this work on personal, prof essional and emotio nal levels. I have gained family and friends and a new understanding of and outlook on life, believe it or not. I trust that you know who you are. There are too many to list. Luiz Barbieri, you were the driving force behind this project initiation. I wo uld not have even considered the degree an option if it were not for your inspiration and encouragement in the early years. Special thanks to my boss Dr. Jim Colvocoresses You were the man of few words throughout this process, but when you spoke I listen ed (most of the time). To upper management Stu Kennedy, Director of the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Gil McRae Director of the Division of Marine Fisheries Management Mark Robson, Ken Haddad, and t he Florida F ish and Wildlife Conservation C ommissi on, I am grateful for the extra time and permission granted to take on this incredible project and life changing journey. The support and guidance you showed me at various points along this journey were tremendous and set the standard to show everyone at v arious
levels of organization (local, academic, state, regional and national) what kind of a strong, solid, and loyal agency we are. Thank you for standing behind me and my work. I cannot express enough gratitude for the patience, perseverance flexibility, strength, humor and creativity of David Westmark Chris Powell and Chad Young None of this work would be completed without you, your knowledge, and technical expertise. In addition, I add Jessica Carroll, Chris Gardinal, Mike Hourihan Janet Tunnell, Ali son Amick, Adam Richardson, Lee Callen, Jaynie Voelz, Angela Gospodarek, Chris Young, Kerry Mesner, Angie Dukeman, David Salzman, Josh Lunde, Josh Taylor and many others to the list of those to be thanked for their hours spent waiting, watching, observing, tracking, lifting, building, working, plumbing, digging, fishing, problem solving, feeding, and experimenting to make this logistical challenge a success. To Mr. Tom Davidson, Mr. Russ Fisher and the Bonefish & Tarpon Trust, there would be no degree witho ut your financial assistance to get me through this period in my life. I am grateful that you believed in my ability and my project and accepted the proposal for funding. Christy Hudak and Jeremy Lake, I thank you for my beautiful maps. To the other acade mic professionals who humored me along my journey, including Dr. Roy Yanong, Dr. Steve Cooke, Dr. Cory Suski, Dr. Janet Ley, and Dr. Aaron Adams, I say thank you for listening when no one else would. Dr. Erin Leone, thank you for getting me through my SAS headaches Dr. Dave Jones, thanks for introducing me to the world of RDA. Finally, to Dr. Paul Wolf and Dr. Allen Wolfe of Lebanon Valley College, to Dr. Kristen Curran at the University of Wisconsin, and to Dr. Suzanne Panferov of the University of Arizo na, I did it despite what I repeatedly told all of you so many years ago when you told me I should go for it.
To my family I say thank you for all the years of supporting this decision despite none of you probably understanding why I am still in school, e xcept maybe Aunt Jo. David, I am really excited and glad that you came to Florida to give tarpon fishing a try. I someday. Robert, I thank you for taking him fishing. Dad, I hope that someday you too will come to Florida to give it a try and see the Silver King in action. Your gift certificate fish. I know you are watching from above and sha king your head in amazement for more reasons than one, but smiling. Keith, it is nice to know you are my neighbor across the Gulf of Mexico with a whole sea of tarpon in between us. Thea, thanks for helping me go through all the ups and downs of this proje ct culminating with the recovery from a ruptured Appendix in the home stretch. I love you all! I am overwhelmed with the effort, kindness and support received from so many people in a combined monumental effort to make this happen I am eternally grateful, humbled and indebted to each of you in various ways. I give you all my sincerest thanks. It has been educational and above all FUN!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project involved a cooperative effort from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWRI) Marine Fisheries Biology staff, Stock Enhancement Research Facility staff Fisheries Independent M onitoring Program staff, the Florida Guides Association, the Boca Grande Fishing Guide Association, and at least one hundred volunteer anglers and guides from the Tampa Bay and Boca Grande area Blood chemistry and diagnostic assistance were provided by Antech Diagnostics (Tampa, FL) and Dr. Diane Sheldon of the Comparative Neuromuscular Laboratory at the University of California (San Diego). I would like to thank the organizations who funded this program through actual financial contributions to include a private research grant from Bonefish & Tarpon Trust and the F isheries C onservation F oundation Fla ts Fishing All iance, Grant F 59 from the Federal A id in Sport Fish Restoration Act and the S tate of Florida tarpon tag program. I would like to thank the American Fisheries Society headquarters in Bethesda, MD who awarded high school student W. Vaughn Crozier a Hutton Fisheries Biologist Scholarship to work on this project during an 8 week internship in 2008. I would also thank the in kind services of time and talents provided by the University of South Florida, the federal government, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Se rvice and the State of F for mentoring, consultation and review includ ing Dr. David Mann, Dr. Ernst Peebles, Dr. Jose Torres Dr. Luiz Barbieri and Dr. Roy Crabtree.
i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. ii i LIST OF FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... iv ABSTRACT ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... v i i CHAPTER 1: A GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO CATCH AND RELEASE ANGLING AND THE TARPON FISHERY IN FLORIDA ....................... 1 Literature Cited ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 11 CH APTER 2: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON THE ATLANTIC TARPON FISHERY IN BOCA GRANDE PASS AND TAMPA BAY TO ESTIMATE SHORT TERM CATCH A ND RELEASE MORTALITY ................................ ................................ ............................ 23 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 23 Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 26 Statistical Analysis ................................ ................................ ..................... 31 Results ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 32 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 37 Conclusions ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 46 Literature Cited ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 48 CHAPTER 3: PHYSIOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES OF TWO SIZE CLASSES OF TARPON ( Megalops atlanticus ) IN RESPONSE TO CATCH AND RELEASE ANGLING ................................ ................................ ..... 74 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 74 Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 77 Control Groups ................................ ................................ ........................... 77 Angling, Handling and Air Exposure ................................ ........................ 78 Field D iagnostics and P hlebotomy ................................ ............................ 79 Statistical Analysis ................................ ................................ ..................... 81 Results ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 83 Angling W ithin S ize C lass ................................ ................................ ......... 83 Angling B etween S ize C lasses ................................ ................................ ... 84 Angling D uration, H andling T ime and E nvironmental P arameters ........... 84 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 87 Scaling E ffects of A ngling ................................ ................................ ......... 96 A ngling, H andling T ime Air Exposure and the E nvironment .................. 97 Literature Cited ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 101
ii CHAPTER 4: MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH ........ 1 23 Literature Cited ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 130 APPENDIX A: FOUL HOOKED TARPON ................................ ................................ .. 13 5 APPENDIX B : A SUMMARY OF SELECTED POST RELEASE MOVEMENTS FROM ACOUSTICALLY TAGGED ATLANTIC TARPON IN BOCA GRANDE PASS AND TAMPA BAY 2002 2007 ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 13 7 APPENDIX C : LIST OF VARIABLE S RECORDED AND CREATED AND THEIR D ESCRIPTIONS FOR TAPRON PHYSIOLOGY .................... 1 59
iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 : Reported number of angler intercepts and number of fish harvested for select inshore fishes in Florida during 2002 ................................ ................... 18 Table 2.1 : A summary of sonic tagging trips in Boca Gr ande Pass (BGP, 2002 2004) and Tampa Bay (TB, 2005 2007) performed to estimate catch and release mortality rates for the recreational Atlantic tarpon fishery along the central and southwest Gulf Coast ................................ .................... 5 6 Table 2.2 : A summary of angling duration (minutes) boat side handling times (minutes), and estimated total lengths (centimeters) for tarpon that were tagged, tracked and released in Boca Grande Pass (n=42) and Tampa Bay (n=40) from 2 002 2007 ................................ ............................... 5 7 Table 2.3 : Field data for the eleven acoustically tagged t arpon recorded as mortalities (suspected and confirmed) in Boca Grande Pass (BGP ) and Tampa Bay (TB) from 2002 2007 ................................ ................................ .. 58 Table 3.1 : A summary of tarpon sizes and field variables related to angling events for each treatment group ................................ ................................ ............... 108 Table 3.2 : A quantita tive summary of eleven hematological parameters measured in adult and sub adult Atlantic tarpon at rest and after angling ..................... 1 1 0 Table 3.3 : A size class comparison of the mean responses of eleven blood parameters to angling ................................ ................................ ..................... 1 1 3 Table 3.4 : Comparisons of blo od chemistries, body size, angling duration and various handling times (PBH, TBT, BoatH, THT) from adult tarpon bled using caudal venipuncture (CV) and gill methods ................................ 1 1 4 Table 4. 1 : Estimates of Atlantic tarpon total annual catch and number released from 2 003 2009 ................................ ................................ ............................. 13 3 Table AA.1 : Specific hook locations for the nine tarpon that were classified as foul hooked and their associated fate (survivor, mortality) in the catch and release mortality study in BGP and TB, 2002 2007 ............................... 13 6
iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. 1 : Numbers of tarpon mounted by Pflueger Taxidermy from 1975 to 1990 ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 19 Figure 1.2 : Total number of $50.00 tarpon harvest and posession tags issued by the stat e of Florida since July 1, 1993 ................................ .............................. 20 Figure 1.3 : Images depicting examples of intense recreationa l fishing pressure for tarpon along Florida's Gulf coast. ................................ ................................ .... 21 Figure 1.4 : A flow diagram summarizing some p otential effects of catch and release angling on tarpon ................................ ................................ ................. 22 Figure 2.1 : Study areas for evaluating catch and release tarpon mortality ....................... 6 2 Figure 2.2 : Examples of artificial lures and live baits used in the catch and release mortality study in Tampa Bay a nd Boca Grande Pass (2002 2007) ................ 6 3 Figure 2.3 : Hook location s observed in tarpon ................................ ................................ .. 6 4 Figure 2.4 : Custom built tagging stick loaded with an ultrasonic transmitter and attached orange and white float for tagging tarpon. ................................ ........ 6 5 Figure 2.5 : An x ray of a tagged tarpon ................................ ................................ ............. 6 5 Figure 2.6 : Images of sonically tagged tarpon from Tampa Bay (A, B) and Boc a Grande Pass (C ) ................................ ................................ ............................... 6 6 Figure 2.7 : Percent catch and release morta lity calculated for Boca Grande Pass (BGP blue fill), Tampa Bay (TB red outline ) and both study areas (TOTAL, grey fill) combined (2002 2007) ................................ ..................... 6 7 Figure 2.8 : Angling duration (in minutes) for each of the 82 tagged and tracked tarpon in Boca Grande Pass ( BGP, blue fill) and Tampa Bay (TB, red outline) during 2002 2007 ................................ ................................ ............... 68 Figure 2.9 : Estimated total length frequencies (in centimeters) for 78 of the 82 tagged and tracked tarpon in Boca Grande Pass (BGP, blue fill) and Tampa Bay (TB, red outline) during 2002 2007 ................................ ............. 69
v Figure 2.10 : Percent mortality calculated for fair and foul hooked tarpon from TB and BGP (n=79) ................................ ................................ ......................... 7 0 Figure 2.11 : Percent mortality calculated for three assigned qualitative conditions release in TB and BGP (n=79) ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 7 1 Figure 2.12 : R epresentative plot of post release movement of a tagged tarpon tracked in lower Tampa Bay at the Sunshine Skyway Bridge ......................... 7 2 Figure 2.13 : R epresentative plot of post release movement of a tagged tarpon hooked in Egmont Channel, north end of Egmont Key in Tampa Bay .......... 7 3 Figure 3.1 : Holding tanks for sub adult (rear) and adul t tarpon (front) control groups ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 11 6 Figure 3.2 : Depictions of two handling treatments for sub adult tarpon ......................... 11 6 Figure 3.3 : Drawing blood using caud al venipuncture methods in a sub adult tarpon (A) and drawing blood from the branchial vessel in a gill arch from an adult tarpon (B) ................................ ................................ ................ 1 17 Figure 3.4 : Results of a multivariate non parametric redundancy analysis examining the variance of tarpon blood respo nses for all handling treatments ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 1 18 Figure 3.5 : Larger tarpon take significantly longer to land in the recreational fishery ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 12 0 Figure 3.6 : Linear regression of angling duration (in minutes) on plasma lactate concentration s in adult tarpon ................................ ................................ ........ 12 1 Figure 3 .7 : A visualization of the interaction effect between angling duration (in minutes) and handling time (in seconds) on lactate in sub adult tarpon ........ 12 2 Figure 4.1 : Estimated annual release mortality based on the National Marine creational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) data for released tarpon along the Gulf coast of Florida during 2003 2009 ................................ ................................ ........................... 13 4 Figure AB.1 : Representative plots of post release movements of three tagged tarpon from Tampa Bay that: A) remained in the vicinit y of where it was tagged, B) returned to the pass or place of release, and C) swam into the Gulf of Mexico ................................ ................................ .................. 14 2
vi Figure AB.2 : Representative plots of post release movements of two tagged tarpon from the beaches of St. Petersburg, FL, that returned to its pl ace of release within t he short term tracking period (A and B) ........................... 14 5 Figure AB.3 : R epresentative plots of post release movements of three tagged and tracked tarpon that were heard again on subsequent days in each portion of Tampa Bay: upper bay (A), middle bay (B) and lower Bay at the Sunshine Skyway Bridge (C) ................................ .............................. 14 7 Figure AB.4 : R epresentative plots of post release movements of four tagged and tracked tarpon from the mouth of Tampa Bay near Egmont Key that were heard again on subsequent days (A D) ................................ ................. 1 5 0 Figu re AB.5 : Mean distance traveled (in kilometers) by tagged tarpon tracked during the first four hours post release in Tampa Bay, 2005 2007. .............. 15 4 Figure AB.6 : Representative plots of post release movements of four tagged tarpon that were caught using artific ial breakaway jigs and fought for 30 minutes in Boca Grande Pass and: A) swam into Charlotte Harbor, B) remained in the pass, C) swam into the Gulf of Mexico and returned, and D) swam into the Gulf but was not detected again .................. 15 5 Figure AB.7 : Representativ e plots of tarpon movements for f ish number 180 (A) and fish number 179 (B) which exemplify fish that follow ed depth contours and channels along its path ................................ ............................. 15 6 Figure AB.8 : Representative plot of a tarpon whose signal stopped moving in Boca Grande Pass and was later confirmed to be dead when the image of the fish was captured on the deployed splash cam ................................ ... 15 8
vii ABSTRACT Atlantic tarpon are sought after because of their fighting ability on various tackle and support a popular, lucrative and predominantly ca tch and release recreational fishery in Florida. They are not commercially harvested or consumed by the general public, therefore assessing effects of catch and release angling on tarpon survival is crit ical to a sustainable fishery. T arpon caught on artif icial breakaway jig and traditional live bait fishing charters in Boca Grande Pass (n=42) and trips from the recreational fishery of Tampa Bay (n=40) were tagged with ultrasonic transmitters and tracked up to 6 hours immediately following release to estima te post release mortality. Of the 82 tagged tarpon, 11 suffered mortality as inferred from move ment patterns (or lack thereof) or visual confirm ation ( i.e. shark attacks) which yields a combined total estimated catch an d release mortality rate of 13% (95% confidence interval: 6 21%). There was no significant difference in mortality betw een the two estuarine systems. Associations between tarpon mortality and angling duration, handling time, fish length bait type (artificial versus natural), and hook type (c ircle Hook location (foul hooking) and swimming condition at release were significant factors on tarpon mortality (P<0.05). Shark predation was the primary ca use of post release mortality (64%). Excluding p redation, the ov erall mo rtality rate was estimated at 5 % and attributed to poor handling and irreparable physiological damage from angling.
viii A ngling events will cause anaerobic activity resulting in physiological disruptions that may have consequences compromising the hea lth and survival of tarpon. Both adult (mature, >70 pounds 31.8 kg ) and sub adult (sexually immature, <20 pounds 9 kg ) release survival and minimizing sub lethal stress effects of both siz e classes are critical to the ir sustainability. In this study, stress responses after exhaustive exercise (angling) were measured using an array of blood chemistry parameters, including hematocrit, hemoglobin, and plasma glucose, lactate, sodium, potassium chloride, calcium, phosphorus magnesium and cortisol Angled, adults (n=45) were compared to large tarpon in a resting state (controls, n=6). Angled, sub adults (n=28) were compared to t hose in a resting state (n=9). Adult tarpon were then compared to sub adults to determine any size related, intra species variation in s tress responses after angling. Finally, because smaller tarpon are logistically easier to handle and may be subjected to prolonged air exposure by anglers for hook removal or photographs we evaluated the effect of 60 seconds of air exposure with horizontal (n=9) or vertical (n=9) handling out of the water relative to non air exposed (n=10) fish in angled sub adult tarpon. Associations and interactions among the blood chemistry responses of tarpon from each treatment to a ngling duration, handling time body size and environmental factors related to each capture event were evaluated using a non parametric, mul tivariate redundancy analysis. The duration of the angling event had a positive ef fect on responses of some parameters, and responses were more extreme in adult tarpon than sub adults The exception was cortisol which was significantly higher in sub adults. Environmental parameters were less influential than angling and handling on obse rved physiological responses. Sub adults showed no difference in physiological
ix responses among handling treatments with and without air exposure and exh ibited no short term mortality. Using appropriate tackle and gear to reduce fight times and handling sho uld help minimize metabolic and acid base imbalances Tagging studies coupled with physiology can be a valuable tool for estimating post release mortality and secondary stress responses of game fish, especially for large species that might be difficult to maintain in floating pens or tank s. Yet adverse effects of catch and release angling could also have p opulation level consequences. Future studies should integrate biology and fish physiology to evaluate post release recovery windows and establish lethal threshold s to provide potential predictive capabilit y of mortality. In general, it appears that sub adult and adult Atlantic tarpon along the Gulf coast of Florida can recover from physiological disturbances incurred during routine catch and release anglin g events in the recreational fishery when they are released in the absence of large predators The anglers themselves can play a key role in tarpon con servation.
CHAPTER ONE : A GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO CATCH AND RELEASE ANGLING AND THE TARPON FISHERY IN FLORIDA A common practice when fishing w ith a hook and line, or angling in recreational fisheries is the practice of catch and release which dates back to the early 15 th century, in a printed treatise from 1 496 or earlier (McDonald 1957). Catch and relea se tournaments have been documented in Britain since the In more modern times, it was determined that current participation in recreational fishing varies between 1% and 40% b y country and that recreational anglers account fo r 12% of the global harvest (Cooke and Cowx 2004) In North America, the practice of catch and release is a frequently required management tool in marine and freshwater systems where fishing regulations impose minimum and maximum size limits and closed s easons on vario us species of fishes. An assumption of catch and release is that fish released alive back into their environment will survive and thus help maintain sustainability of the stock (Pollock and Pine 2007) Published articles that recognize the i mpact of commercial and recreational fishing on fish stocks (Schroeder and Love 2002 Coleman et al. 2004, Cooke and Cowx 2006 ) and that increase the awareness of animal welfare issues (Arlinghaus 2007) are ca using angling ethics to change. More anglers ar e voluntarily releasing their fish as personal incentives to fish shift to non retention factors such as improving their skills, being
2 factors ( i.e for food) (Calv ert 2002). As long as the anglers are satisfied without keeping their catch, they will continue fishing potentially resulting in increased fishing pressure. promote s the state as being the Fish ing Capital of the World More than $5.4 recreational fishery which outranks the cattle and citrus industries (2006 US Fish and Wildlife Service Report). The number of fishing licenses sold (resident an d non resident), the average number of for hire licenses sold to small vessles (up to four passengers), and the average number of registered vessels (fresh and saltwater) in the state have all increased from 1982 through 2007 (Hanson and S a uls, in prep). I human population growth continues to increase as it has ( Bureau of Economics and Business R esearch http://www.bebr.ufl.edu/ ), and increasing trends in the sale of fishing licenses and registered vessel s continue, it seems intuitive that more p eople will want to fish state waters as demonstrated in recent reports (Harper et al. 2000, Ault et al. 2005). It becomes imperative to understand the potential fate (lethal or sublethal) of all released fish es, whether they were released for re gulatory or voluntary reasons. If government, biologists, resource managers and anglers take proactive steps to create successful and sustainable catch and release fisheries, it may make it easier for the angling public to accept more stringent management plans if de emed necessary for a fi shery (Schramm & Gerard 2004). Yet, i t is important to acknowledge from the start that there are mortalities associated with catch and release angling.
3 Two quite lucrative and extremely popular sport fisheries in Florida, bonefish and Atlantic tarpon, are already predominantly catch and release, as they are not commercially harvested or consumed by the general public (Bruger and Haddad 1986) Both species are economically important and support large recreational fisheries, so maxim izing post release survival and minimizing stress associated with angling are critical to the continued success of these fisheries Atlantic tarpon, Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes 1847, is a gonochoristic, highly migratory species that frequents coastal and inshore waters of the tropical and subtropical regions of the western Atlantic Ocean ranging from Cape Cod to Brazil (Crabtree et al. 1995, McMillen Jackson et al. 2005). Along the eastern Atlantic Ocean they inhabit tropical waters of western Africa f rom Mauritania to Angola concentrating around the Gulf of Guinea (Anyanwu and Kusemiju 2008). A population has also been established off Panama in the Pacific Ocean ( Swanson 1946) Much of what we know about the life history of Atlantic tarpon in terms of their age and growth (Cyr 1991, Crabtree et al. 1995, Andrews et al. 2001), reproductive biology (Babcock 1936, Cyr 1991, Crabtree et al. 1 992, Crabtree 1995, Crabtree et al. 1997), early life history descriptions and habitat preference (Moffett and Randal l 1957, Harrington 1958 Harrington and Harrington 1960, Harrington 1966, Eldred 1972, Crabtree 1995, Bishop and Torres 1999, Poulakis et al. 2002, Shenker et al. 1995, Shenker et al. 2002 ) and behavior (Shlaifer and Breder 1940, Shlaifer 1941, Breder 1939 and 1944, Geiger et al. 2000, Luo et al. 2008) is based on research performed in Florida waters. Most studies on Atlantic tarpon have examined the early life history stages. Adult tarpon spawn presumably offshore making spawning migrations from inshore feeding
4 areas to offshore spawning grounds as inferred from 3 to 6 day old leptocephalus larvae collections made as far as 250 km off the wes t coast of Florida (Crabtree et al. 1992 ) Leptocep ha li go through three distinct growth phases. Crabtree et al. (1992) e stimated ages of the Phase I larvae collected from 2 to 25 days and growth rates of ca 0.92 mm per day. A Phase I leptocephalus typically reside s in o ceanic waters for 30 to 50 days, though this phase can be shortened to two to three weeks with th e aid of storm events (Crabtree et al. 1992, Shenker et al. 2002) Phase II begins at the onset of metamorphosis where larvae shrink in size from about 26mm to 14mm ( Harrington 1966 ) This metamorphosis takes place as they come inshore and are potentially triggered by environmental cues (Cyr 1991) that may induce the required changes to occur ( Shiao and Hwang, 2006). Phase III is reflected by resumed positive growth through cycloid scale formation and is finished upon tarpon reaching sizes of ca. 40mm in le ngth (Harrington 1958 Harrington and Harrington 1960). Phase II and Phase III larvae and juvenile tarpon will inhabit stagnant, back water, marsh and mangrove lined areas that are low in dissolved oxygen and high in organic matter (Robins 1977, Zerbi et a l. 2001). Juvenile tarpon ( ca. 40mm to 300mm) remain in back water habitats to feed and grow to attain sizes less vulnerable to predation ( Breder 1944, Harrington and Harrington 1960, Poulakis et al. 2002 ) They are bimodal breathers and use their swim b ladders as air breathing organs, so these seemingly adverse and physiologically demanding habitats for most fish es are inhabitable for tarpon where they probably experience low predation rates and have little competition for resources (S c hlaifer and Breder 1940 Geiger et al. 2000) Once attaining sizes of 250 to 400mm juvenile tarpon start to venture out of these
5 back water areas to upper estuarine, mangrove creeks and canals, and even into the ri vers (Rickards 1968, Cyr 1991). Atlantic t arpon are large fish that can attain lengths of over 2m and weights over 100kg ( International Game Fish Associat ion, 2008 World Record Game Fishes) and are a long lived species ( Crabtree et al. 1995 ) with ages that may exceed 78 years (Andrews et al. 2001). Growth is rapi d until approximately age 12 when it slows considerably after sexual maturity (Cyr 1991, Crabtree et al. 1995). Based on Crabtree et al. (1997), the average size of sexu al maturity for female tarpon in Florida is 1,285mm (51.4 inches) and 1,175mm (47 inche s) for males and adult tarpon sexually mature by age 10 O nly one female examined in that study was mature at a younger age (7) and she was unusually large for her age. From tarpon examined in Crabtree et al. (1997), it was determined that the spawning sea son in Florida last s from April to July and by August 90% were spent ; yet in other more tropical locations such as Costa Ri ca spawning may be year round. Despite this knowledge of tarpon biology and life history relatively little is known about the tarpon fishery in Florida. Stat e regulations implemented a two fish daily bag limit in 1952 th at is still in place today (2010 ) and granted tarpon gamefish status in 1953 so they could not be commercially harvested or sold By a boomin g million dollar industry that provided a mainstay for many small Gulf coast establishments and tarpon were killed routinely for mounts (Wade and Robins 197 3 ). Yet, tarpon taxidermy records show that the number of fish mounted each year began to decline in the mid s (Crabtree unpublished data, 1990, Figure 1.1). Pflueger Taxidermy in particular offered a $50.00 cash incentive to customers who would try a fiberglass tarpon mount over a skin mount which helped to shift the focus of Flori da
6 anglers from catch and kill to a more conservation oriented concept of catch and release (Capt. Bouncer Smith, personal communication, Miami). Today tarpon harvest rates are low in Florida. In 1989, a new law was enacted and the harvest of tarpon bec ame regulated by Florida Statute 370.062 The tarpon tag program which allows for the harvest of tarpon through purchase of a permit (tag) is managed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Any angler wanting to harvest or possess a tarpon must purchase a $50.00 permit and pay an additional $1.50 fee at a county tax collector office. Every angler who purchases a tarpon Data from angler ret urn cards in t he FWC Tarpon Possession Tag program show that since fiscal year (FY) 2003 2004, 27 or fewer tarpon were killed annually but non compliance by anglers who forget to return their card is over 70% (Guindon unpublished data) Therefore, using n umbers of permits sold as a proxy for harvest is a more conservative estimate of potential harvest Only 282 tarpon permits were issued in FY 2008 2009 as compared to t he 961 permits sold in 1989, and from FY 1993 1994 through FY 2008 2009 the maximum num ber of tarpon permits sold annually statewide was 534 (mean 341, Figure 1.2 ) The tarpon permit program seems to have substantially reduced the number of tarpon being harvested statewide Th e acceptance of this shift in management was mostly positive and t he fishery has evolved into a de facto catch and release fishery (Nelson 2002) Most of the potential deleterious effects on tarpon populations (lethal or sub lethal) will stem from the practice of catch and release fishing since most tarpon caught in Flor ida a re released alive. However, there are no realistic monitoring programs in
7 place to evaluate or record fishing effort for Atlantic tarpon To put this in perspective with respect to other species the 2002 Florida angler intercepts recorded in the fede ral Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) reported that more than 28,200 spotted sea trout, 5,700 red drum and 5,200 snook were harvested by recreational anglers that year (Table 1.1). This same survey intercepted only 128 anglers targeti ng tarpon who caught 178 fish of which one was harvested for the entire year (Table 1.1). Observations made on the waterways during peak tarpon season (May June) in prime locations along the central Gulf Coast show ed that numbers of recreational anglers an d guides target ing this sport fish may exceed 70 boats with more tha n 100 anglers fi shi ng on any given day (Guindon unpublished data) This far exceeds the 128 anglers intercepted during the given year (2002) There is ex tensive fishing pressure on tarpon stocks around the state and the tarpon season varies by region (Figure 1.3). There is a need to discern whether or not a tarpon can withstand the fishing press ure placed on them by anglers. Fishing for giant tarpon is promoted on television radio, w ebsi tes, and in popular literature N ews of popular fishing locales and advertisements of are now public domain through the internet, cellular telephones, and technical GPS navigational tools that will save you (Cooke and Cowx 2006). As the tarpon fishery is promoted, angler awareness increases, and fish ing pressure may increase. I ncreasing recreational fishing effort can lead to more tarpon being caught and released the effects of which are mostly unkn own. In the case of common snook where many anglers choose to practice catch and release or are required to release their fish because of regulated size and bag limits, studies indicate that the catch and release mortality o f released snook is actually
8 ap proaching rates as high as if there were commercial harvest on the fishery (Muller and Taylor 2002) With time, these cryptic mortality rates can have significant population level effects some of which could arguably be equated to issues of by catch and di scards in the commercial fishing industry (Cooke and Cowx 2006, Coggins et al. 2007). Little is known about the po st release survival of tarpon. F ishes can die from the stress of exhaustive exercise such as that experienced by a tarpon during angling (Wo od et al. 1983). If the duration and magnitude of the stress or, such as angling or improper handling of the fish, is beyond biological tolerance limits of the tarpon, the fish may suffer short term mortality (within 0 to 6 hours) or delayed mortality (> 6 hours Figure 1.4 ). In many mortality studies, fish are released into net pens for observation of post release mortality (Malchoff and Heins 1997, Carbines 1999, Grover et al. 2002, Pope and Wilde 200 4 Millard et al. 2003, Suski et al. 2004). Delayed morta lity experienced by some of those fishes confined to pens for several days or weeks may have been attributed to caging artifacts and therefore bias mortality rate estimates Adult t arpon are active, large, coastal pelagic teleosts and logistically are not conducive to net pen studies for post release observations. Furthermore, net pens exclude predators which may have a significant effect on post release mortality (Cooke and Philipp 2004), so catch and release mortality studies on tarpon in their natural en vironment where the fishery occurs would be best Studies show that terminal tackle, hook location s, bait type, fight times, and angler experience can all affect the survival of released fishes (Muoenke and Childress 1994) The need to estimate post releas e survival rates and evaluate the potentially lethal effects of tackle and angling duration for tarpon is a logical next step for protecting Florida stocks.
9 There have been n o studies on the physiological sub lethal effects of catch and release angling on Atlantic tarpon Angling can cause physical and physiological damage to the fish which evokes a stress response that may have lethal or sub lethal consequences (Mazeaud et al. 1977 Skomal 2006, Figure 1.4 ). Physical damage might include hook wounds, exc essive bleeding, tissue tears or damage due to improper handling when removing the hook, holding the fish while taking a photo, tagging or gaffing the tarpon at the side of the boat, or be caused by predation. Physiological damage is reflected in the resul tant imbalances that can occur internally via the interlinked cardio vascular, respiratory, endocrine, nervous, immune, gastro intestinal, and musculoskeletal systems casuing a fish to respond and adapt to the angling event (Young et al. 2006). Tarpon are very aggressive fight with great strength and stamina and are known for acrobatic leaps into the air when hooked all of which could exacerbate damage incurred during angling events The damage cause s stress (acute or chronic) to the animal. Immediate st ress responses in fishes are the primary effects mediated from the hypothalamus pituitary interrenal pathway or via chromaffin cells that trigger the release of catecholamines ( i.e. adrenaline) and corticosteroids into the blood stream (Mazeaud et al. 1977 Figure 1.4 ). This is an alarm response on t he order of seconds to minutes. In turn, these hormones trigger a compensatory response via secondary effects that are reflected in acid base imbalances (metabolic and respiratory acidosis), electrolyte imbalanc e, glycogen depletion, lactate production immunosuppression, and increased cardiovascular function as the animal begins to adapt and attempts to regulate back to normal, pre stress conditions (Mazeaud et al. 1977, Wood 1991, Wendel aar Bonga 1997, Kieffer 2000). The level of disturbance as indicated through changes in these
10 physiological stress responses can be measured from a blood sample of the stressed animal when compared relative to a non stressed animal or relative to the magnitude of the source of st ress, such as angling and handling times or water temperatures. The cascade of stress effects caused by p hysiological damage can often be regulated back to normal but at a high energy cost to the fish A tarpon may adapt and recover from the stress of an gling as was observed in an Australian study on the Atlantic congener Megalops cyprinoides (Wells et al. 2003) However, if an Atlantic tarpon survives, but is unable to regulate back to normal, the cumulative impacts of chronic stressors on tarp on may affect the organism in more subtle, sub lethal ways. These are termed tertiary effects (Mazeaud et al. 1977 Figure 1.4 ). In time, tertiary effects can have population level implications such as reducing growth rates, reducing reproductive success, reducing spawning stock biomass, diminishing successful recruitment to the next life history stages, or reducing overall fitness ( Wedemeyer et al. 1990 Cooke et al. 2002). Given the potential tertiary effects of angling on tarpon and understanding that ta rpon are a periodic species, long lived with delayed maturation and long generation times (Winemiller and Rose 1992, Winemiller and Dailey 2002, Schroeder and Love, 2002), one needs to also consider the effects of angling at the earlier life history stages also targeted in Ricklefs and Wikelski 2002 Young et al. 2006). This dissertation address es the effects of catch and release fishing on survival and physiological stress responses of Atlantic tarpon caught along central and s outhwest Gulf Coast Chapter two is a n observational study of guided tarpon trips that use two predominant tarpon fishing methods in Boca Grande Pass, a world famous tarpon
11 fishing destination and the recr eational fishery of Tampa Bay. The study estimate s the short term post release mortality rates using acoustic telemetry and examines the effects of estuary, angling duration (fight times) handling time, fish size, bait type, hook type, hook location and the condition of the fish at release relative to survival. A summary of tarpon movements a fter release is also presented. Chapter Three quantifies the physiological response of two size classes of tarpon to exhaustive exercise (angling) as determined from changes in select blood parameters. Chapter Thre e also examines the physiological response of angled sub adult tarpon to effects of air exposure and varying handling practices prior to release. The level of disturbance for each selected blood parameter is then evaluated relative to angling duration, han dling time, fish siz e and environmental variables. The final chapter summarize s findings from the current work into useful science based guidelines for anglers and managers to increase post release survival and minimize stress of tarpon caught and released tarpon fishery in an effort to keep it sustainable. Literature Cited Andrews,A.H., Burton,E.J., Coale,K.H., Cailliet,G.M., and Crabtree,R.E. 2001. Radiometric age validation of Atlantic tarpon, Megalpos atlanticus Fish. Bull., 9 9 : 389 398. Anyanwu,P.E. and Kusemiju,K. 2008. The Nigerian t arpon: resource e cology and f ishery. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and m anagement of the w orld ta rpon and b onefish f ish eries. CRC Press, pp. 115 128. Arlinghaus,R., Cooke,S.J., Lyman,J., Policansky,D ., Schwab,A., Suski,C.D., Sutton,S.G., and Thorstad,E.B. 2007. Understanding the complexity of catch and release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev. Fish. Sci. 15 : 75 167. Ault,J.S., Bohnsack,J.A., Smith,S.G., and Luo,J. 2005. Towards sustainable multispecies fisheries in the Florida, USA, Coral Reef Ecosystem. Bull. Mar. Sci. 76 : 595 622.
12 Babcock,L.L. 1936. The Tarpon: a description of the fish together wi th some hints on its capture, 4 th edition. Babcock, Buffalo. 175 pp. Bishop,R.E. and Torres,J.J. 1999. Leptocephalus energetics: metabolism and excretion. J. Exp. Biol. 202 : 2485 2493. Breder,C.M. 1939. On the trail of the tarpon. Bulletin The New York. Zo ol. Soc. XLII : 99 108. Breder,C.M. 1944. Materials for the study of the life history of Tarpon atlanticus Zool. 29(3) : 217 252. Bruger, G. E., and Haddad K.D 1986. Management of tarpon, bonefish and snook in Florida. In R. H. Stroud (ed.) Multi jurisdict ional management of marine fishes: Marine Recreational Fisheries II. Proceedings of the eleventh annual marine recreational fisheries symposium. Tampa, FL. May, 1986. National Coalition for Marine Conservation, Inc. Savannah, GA. Calvert,B. 2002. The impo rtance of angler motivations in sport fishery management. In: T.J.Pitcher and C.E.Hollingworth, (eds.). Recreational fisheries: ecological, economic and social evaluation. Blackwell Sci. Oxford, pp. 120. Carbines,G.D. 1999. Large hooks reduce catch and rele ase mortality of blue cod Parapercis colias in the Marlborough Sound of New Zealand. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 19 : 992 998. Coggins,L.G., Catalano, M.J., Allen, M.S., Pine, W.E. and Walters C.J. 2007. Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management. Fish Fish. 8 : 196 210. Coleman,F.C., Figueira,W.F., Ueland,J.S., and Crowder,L.B. 2004. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science. 305 : 1958 1959. Cooke, S. J., Schreer, J. F., D unmall, K. M., and Phillip, D. P. 2002. Strategies for q uantifying s ublethal e ffects of m arine c atch and r elease a ngling: Insights from no vel f reshwater a pplications. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catch and r elease in m arine r ecreational f isheries. Be thesda, Maryland, USA: Am erican Fisheries Soc iety 30, pp. 121 134. Cooke,S.J. and Philipp,D.P. 2004. Behavior and mortality of caught and released bonefish ( Albula spp.) in Bahamian waters with implications for a sustainable recreational fishery. Biol. Co nserv : 599 607. Cooke,S.J. and Cowx,I.G. 2004. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bio Sci. 54 : 857 859.
13 Cooke,S.J. and Cowx,I.G. 2006. Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: Searching for common issues to promote unified conserv ation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biol.Conserv. 128 : 93 108. Crabtree, R.E. 1990. Summary of tarpon permit data and progress on tarpon life history research Sta t e of Florida, D epartment of Natural Resources, Florida Marine Research In stitute, St. Petersburg, Fl. Crabtree,R.E., Cyr,E.R., Bishop,R.E., Falkenstein,L.M., and Dean,J.M. 1992. Age and growth of tarpon, Megalpos atlanitcus, larvae in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, with notes on relative abundance and probable spawning areas. Env. Biol. Fishes. 35 : 361 370. Crabtree,R.E. 1995. Releationship between lunar phase and spawning activity of tarpon, Megalops atlanticus with notes on the distribution of larvae. Bull. Mar. Sci. 56 : 895 899. Crabtree,R.E., Cyr,E.R., and Dean,J.M. 1995. Age and growth of tarpon, Megalops atlanticus, from South Florida waters. Fish. Bull. 93 : 619 628. Crabtree,R.E., Cyr,E.R., Chacon Chaverri,D., McLarney,W.O., and Dean,J.M. 1997. Reproduction of tarpon, Megalops atlanticus, from Florida and Costa Rican waters and notes on their age and growth. Bull. Mar. Sci. 61 : 271 285. Cyr,E.C. 1991 Aspects of the life history of the tarpon, Megalops atlanticus from South Florida. University of South Carolina. 1 138 Eldred, B. 1972. Note on larval tarpon, Megalops atlanticu s (Megalopidae), in the Florida Straits. No. Part 1 (Pisces) No.22. Geiger,S.P., Torres,J.J., and Crabtree,R.E. 2000. Air breathing and gill ventilation frequencies in juvenile tarpon, Megalops atlanticus : responses to changes in dissolved oxygen, temperat ure, hydrogen sulfide, and pH. Env. Biol Fishes. 59 : 181 190. Grover,A.M., Mohr, M. S., and Palmer Zwahlen, M. L. 2002. H/R mortality of Chinook salmon from drift mooching with circle hooks: management implications for California's ocean sport fishery. In: J.A .Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.) Catch and r elease in m arine r ecreational f isheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: Am erican Fisheries Soc iety 30, pp. 39 56. Hanson, C.W. and Sauls B 2011. Status of recreational saltwater fishing in Florida: characterization of license sales, participation, and fishing effort. (in prep) Bethesda, Maryland, USA: Am erican Fisheries Soc iety. Harper,D.E., Bohnsack,J.A., and Lockwood,B.R. 2000. Recreational fisheries in Biscayne National Park, Florida, 1976 1991. Mar. Fish. Rev. 26 : 8 26.
14 Harrington,R.W. 1958. Morphometry and ecology of small tarpon, Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes, from transitional stage through onset of scale formation. Copeia 1: 1 10. Harrington,R.W. and Harrington,E.S. 1960. Food of larval and young tarpon, Mega lops atlanticus Copeia 3 : 11 319. Harrington,R.W. 1966. Changes through one year in the growth rates of tarpon, Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes, reared from mid metamorphosis. Bull. Mar. Sci. 16 : 863 883. International Game Fish Associat 2008 World Record Game Fishes 2008. Pp.202 236. Kieffer,J.D. 2000. Limits to exhaustive exercise in fish. Comp. Bio. Phys iol. Part A 126 : 161 179. Luo,J., Ault,J.S., Larkin,M.F., Humston,R., and Olson,D.B. 2008. Seasonal m igratory p atterns and v erticle h abitat u tilization of Alantic t arpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) from s atellite PAT t ags. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and m anagement of the w orld t arpon and b onefish f isheries. CRC Press, pp. 275 299. Malchoff,M.H. and Heins,S.W. 1997. Short term hooking mortality of weakfish caught on single barbed hooks. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 17 : 477 481. Mazeaud,M.M., Mazeaud,F., and Donaldson,E.M. 1977. Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Trans Am. Fish. Soc. 106 : 201 212. McDonald,J., Sherman,K., and Webster,D. 1957. The origins of angling and a new printing of "The treatise of fishing with an angle". Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, NY. Pp.273. McMillen Jackson,A.L., Bert,T.M., Cruz Lopez,H., Seyoum,S., Orsoy,T., and Crabtree,R.E. 2005. Molecular genetic variation in tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes) in the northern Atlantic ocean. Mar. Biol. 146 : 253 261. Millard,M.J., Fletcher,J.W., Mohler,J., Kahnle,A., and Hattala,K. 2003. Mortality associated with catch and release of striped bass in the Hudson river. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 10 : 295 300. Moffett, A. W. and Randall,J. E. 1957. The Roger Firestone tarpon investigation. No. 57 22.
15 Muller,R.G., and Taylor ,R.G 2002. The 2002 stock assessment update of common snook, Centropomus undecimalis. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Marine Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Fl. Muoneke,M.I. and Childress W.M. 1994. Hooking mortality: a review for recreational fisher ies. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2 : 123 156. Nelson, R. S. 2002.Catch and release; A management tool for Florida. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme. Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: Am erican Fisheries Soc iety 30, pp. 11 14. Poli cansky,D. 2002. Catch and release recreational fishing: a historical perspective. In: T.J.Pitcher and C.E.Hollingworth ,(eds.). Recreational fisheries: ecological, economic and social evaluation. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 74 94. Pollock,K.H. and Pine,W.E 2007. The design and analysis of field studies to estimate catch and release mortality. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 123 130. Pope,K.L. and Wilde G.R. 2004. Effect of catch and release angling on growth of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides Fish Man ag. Ecol 11 : 39 44. Poulakis,G.R., Shenker,J.M., and Taylor,D.S. 2002. Habitat use by fishes after tidal reconnection of an impounded estuarine wetland in the Indian River lagoon, Florida (USA). Wetl. Ecol. and Manag. 10 : 51 69. Ricklefs,R.E. and Wikelski,M. 2002. The physiology/life history nexus. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 462 468. Robins, C. R. 1977.The Tarpon unusual biology and man's impact determine its future. Proceedings 2nd Annual Marine R ecreational Fisheries Symposium, pp. 105 112. Schlaifer,A. and Br eder,C.M. 1940. Social and respiratory behavior of small tarpon. Zool. 25 : 493 512. Schlaifer,A. 1941. Additional social and physiological aspects of respiratory behavior in small tarpon. Zool. 26 : 55 60. Schramm,H.L. and Gerard ,P.D. 2004. Temporal changes in fishing motivation among fishing club anglers in the United States. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 11 : 313 321. Schroeder,D.M. and Love M.S. 2002. Recreational fishing and marine fish populations in California. CalCOFl Rep. 43 : 182 190. Shenker, J. M., Crabtree,R. E., and Zavala Garcia, F. 1995. Recruitment of larval tarpon and other fishes Into the Indian river lagoon. Bull. Mar. Sci. 57(1), 284 284.
16 Shenker,J.M., Mojica,E.C., Crabtree,R.E., Patterson,H.M., Stevens,C., and Yakubik,K. 2002. Recruitment of tarpon ( M egalops Atlanticus ) leptocephali into the Indian river lagoon, Florida. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 35 : 55 69. Shiao,J.C. and Hwang ,P.P 2006. Thyroid hormones are necessary for the metamorphosis of tarpon Megalops cyprinoides leptocephali. J. Exp. Biol. 331 : 121 132. Skomal,G. 2006. The physiological effects of capture stress on post release survivorship of sharks, tunas, and marlin. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston, MD, USA: Boston University, 304 pp. Suski,C.D., Killen,S.S., Cooke,S.J., Kieffer,J.D., Phillip,D.P.,and Tufts,B.L. 2004. Physiological significance of the weigh in during live release angling tournaments for largemouth bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133 : 1291 1303. Swanson, P.L. 1946. Tarpon in the Pacific. Copeia, 3 : 175 175. U.S. Department of the Interior, F ish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Associated Recreation. Wade, R. A. and Robins C.R 1973. The tarpon and its sportfishery: a review of our knowledge and outline of the problem. International Game Fish Conference, 15:16 27 Wedemeyer, G.A., Barton, B.A. and McLeay D.L. 1990. Stress and acclimation. In: C. B. Schreck and P. B. Moyle (eds). Methods for fish biology Bethesda, Maryland, USA: Am erican Fisheries Soc iety. Pages 451 489 Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., Baudinette,R.V., Christian,K., and Bennett,M.B. 2003. Oxygen transport capacity in the air breathing fish, Megalops cyprinides : compensations for strenuous exercise. Comp. Biol. Chem. Physiol. Part A 134 : 45 53. Wendelaar Bonga,S.E. 1997. The stress repsponse in fish. Physiol. Rev. 77 : 591 625. Winemiller,K.O. and Rose ,K.A 1992. Patterns of life history diversification in North American fishes: Implications for population regulation. Can. J. F ish. Aquat. Sci. 49 : 2196 2218. Winemiller,K.O. and Dailey ,W.H 2002. Life history strategies, population dynamics, and consequences for supplemental stocking of tarpon. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 35 : 81 94. Wood,C.M., Turner, J.D. and Graham M.S. 1983. Why do fis h die after severe exercise? J. Fish. Biol, 22 : 189 201.
17 Wood,C.M. 1991. Acid base and ion balance, metabolism, and their interactions after exhaustive exercise in fish. J. Exp. Biol. 160 : 285 308. Young,J.L, Bornick, Z.B., Marcotte, M.L., Charlie, K.N., W agner, G.N., Hinch, S.G. and Cook S.J. 2006. Integrating physiology and life history to improve fisheries management and conservation. Fish Fish. 7 : 262 283. Zerbi,A., Aliaume,C., and Joyeux,J. C. 2001. Growth of juvenile tarpon in Puerto Rican estuaries. ICES, J. of Mar. Sci. 58 : 87 95.
18 Table 1 .1 : Reported number of angler intercepts and number of fish harvested for select inshore fishes in Florida during 2002 East and Gulf Coast data were combined. Data are from the NMFS, Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey database. Species: No. intercepts No. fish Spotted Seatrout 6 177 28 228 Red Drum 2 274 5 753 Common Snook 1 402 5 247 Tarpon 128 178 Harvested Tarpon 1 Total Angler Intercepts 52 643
19 Figure 1 .1 : Numbers of tarpon mounted by Pflueger Taxidermy from 1975 to 1990 Plot reproduced from an unpublished State of Florida report (Crabtree 1990; FWC, formerly Department of Natural Resources ).
20 Fi gure 1. 2: Total number of $50.00 t arpon harvest and posession tags issued by the state of Florida since July 1, 1993. Numbers are reported by fiscal years ( i.e. 9394 is the Fiscal Year from July 1 1993 to June 30 1994 ).
21 Figure 1. 3 : Images depicting e xamples of intense recreational fishing pressure for tarpon along Florida's Gulf coast Images show evening fishing in BGP (A) day time fishing in Tampa Bay (B) holiday weekend fishing on Memorial Day in Boca Grande Pass ( C ) and during tarpon tournaments ( D ).
22 Figure 1. 4: A flow diagram summarizing some p otential effects of catch and releas e angling on tarpon. Figure is adopted from Mazeaud et al. 1977 and Skomal 2006. Physical Damage Physiological Damage Acute Stress Stre Stress Chronic Stress Primary Effects Secondary Effects Short term Mortality Survival Potential Effects of Catch and Release Angling on Tarpon Delayed Mortalit y Tertiary Effects: Sub lethal responses with population level implications. Reduced growth, reduced reproductive success, diminished fitness or condition, increased susceptilibility to disease, detri mental changes in behavior.
23 CHAPTER TWO : AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON THE ATLANTI C TARPON FISHERY IN BOCA GRANDE PASS AND TAMPA BAY TO ESTIMATE SHORT TERM CATCH AND RELEASE MORTALITY Introduction Atlantic tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) have a history in Florida for being one of the most highly sought inshore sport fish in state waters (Mygatt 1890, Oppel and Meisel 1987). They are known for their acrobatic prowess and fight and the popularity of this gamefish supports a rapidly growing recreational fishery that contributes significantly to et al. 2008 Fedle r 2011 ). Tarpon are commonly encountered in coastal and inshore waters throughout the state where people can fish for them from land and by boat using a variety of fishing techniques, gear (fly, spinning, conventional), bait s, and tackle. State regulation s require anglers to purchase a $50.00 jaw tag (i.e., a permit) t o harvest or possess a tarpon. The number of tarpon tags sold and used each year has been used as a proxy to estimate annual harvest; however, current regulations have created a predominan tly catch and release fishery. In a catch and release fishery, the sustainability of local stocks relies on the assumption that most fish being caught and released will su rvive (Pollock and Pine 2007). Yet the reality is that a released tarpon could suffer po tentially lethal or sub lethal effects that may eventually have population level effects
24 on behavior, growth, or reproductive success (Mazeaud et al. 1977, Wood et al. 1983, Cooke et al. 2002). The most severe endpoint of catch and release fishing is dea th of the fish. Lethal responses of fish to angling events are species specific and there is much within species variation (Cooke and Suski 2005). Many fisheries studies have measured lethal effects of catch and release angling and associated fact ors con tributing to mortality. A review paper by Muoenke and Childress (1994) summarized literature on 32 different taxa (marine and freshwater species) and found that most mortality occurs within 24 h ou rs. T hey generally concluded that hooking mortality increase s with the following: increasing water temperatures, increasing depth due to barotrauma, lowering dissolved oxygen levels, the length of the fish, single hooks as opposed to treble hooks, barbed hooks rather than barbless hooks, fish hooked in the gills or esophagus rather than non vital areas, and when using natural b aits rather than flies or lures. If post release tarpon survival is in fact low, the future health of local stocks could be reduced since it is often the dense aggregations of reproductively m ature fish during peak spawning season (May June) that are exploited in the fishery. Survival studies would be beneficial to potentially identify ways to maximize post release survival and minimize stress responses and promote the continued success of this fishery in the near absence of harvest; however, surprisingly little is known of the fates of tarpon after catch and release. To date, only one study (Edwards 1998) has evaluated post release survival of tarpon caught along the southwest Florida coast u sing acoustic telemetry in one of the et al. 2008). Underwater telemetry has been successfully used to estimate mortality rates in marine fishes such as
25 sailfish (Jolley and Irby 1979), black marl in (Pepperell and Davis 1999), tunas (Skomal 2006), various sharks and rays (Sundstrom et al. 2001, Gurshin and Szedylmayer 2004, Skomal 2006), and bonefish (Cooke and Philipp 2004, Humston et al. 2005, Danylchuk et al. 2007 a (1998) were its limited sample size and witness of one mortality. With the increasing awareness and growing popularity of the was growing public concern that the subsequent fishing pressure and reports of increased shark predation in the pass could be affecting the numbers of tarpon locally available and cause the overall population to decline. Tampa Bay also supports a large recreational catch and release tarpon fishery with intense fishi ng pressure during peak spawning season. Because of its location between the two major metropolitan areas of Tampa and St. Petersburg, Tampa Bay has many residential saltwater anglers. A five year record (fiscal year 0405 to 0809) showed that Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa Bay area outnumbered sales of residential saltwater fishing licenses in Lee and Charlotte counties bordering Cha rlo tte Harbor by more than 55, 6 00 ( F lorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Licen sing and Permittin g unpublished data) Sales of tarpon tags during that same five year interval were also higher in these two Tampa Bay counties (n=646) than Charlotte Harbor counties (n=548). Hundreds of tarpon anglers also participate in catch and release tournaments th at are sponsored by local universities, private community groups, cities, and fishing clubs in both l ocations. Because of their proximity to each other and their growing tarpon sport fisheries Boca Grande Pass and Tampa Bay were chosen to
26 represent the so uthwest and central Gulf Coast fishery in an investigation to re evaluate post release survival of tarpon. The primary objective of this study was to obtain estimates of short term, catch and release mortality rates for tarpon in Boca Grande Pass and Tampa Bay using acoustic telemetry. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the potentially lethal effects of catch and release fishing practices relative to angling duration (fight time), handling time, fish size, bait type, hook type, hook location (foul hookin g), and fish condition at release on tarpon mortality. Methods Boca Grande Pass (BGP) is a deep water pass that is the primary inlet into Charlott e Harbor in southwest Florida. The boundaries of the pass have been defined by the Florida Fish and Wildlife C onservation Commission for regulatory purposes and are used in various tarpon tourname nts (Figure 2.1A). The pass contains hard bottom and limestone ledges and is bordered with shoals to the north and south. Tampa Bay (TB) is a shallow water estuary locat ed along the west central coast of Florida. The distribution of the Tampa Bay fishery (Figure 2.1B) is geographically more widespread than that observ ed within the boundaries of BGP. Angling for tarpon occurs throughout the bay (upper, middle and lower) an d along adjacent Gulf of Mexico beaches (Figure 2.1A). Sampling was conducted during a ten week period from late April to the first week of July in 2002 to 2004 in BGP, and from late April through August of 2005 2007 in TB with a goal of tagging a minimu m of 30 tarpon in each location. Sampling effort in BGP was distributed among 36 professional fishing guides that used either traditional
27 live bait or artificial breakaway jigs fishing methods on their charters; the two predominant t arpon fishing methods i n BGP. I n Tampa Bay, effort focused on either roving areas with high concentrations of tarpon anglers such as the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in lower Tampa Bay or Egmont Channel at the mouth of the bay, or shadowing pre arranged tarpon fishing trips. Cooperat ing trips in TB included both professionally guided and strictly recreational vessels. In BGP, a research biologist accompanied one guided charter per day while two other biologists waited in a state research vessel to track the tagged tarpon. In TB, all three biologists were on the research vessel from the star t of the trip. If any angler was observed hooking a tarpon during a roving trip, the research vessel approached the el to ask permission to tag it. If it was an arranged trip, staff wo uld simply approach to tag the tarpon after being given an approving signal from the angler or guide. Anglers and guides provided the tackle themselves and paying customers on the guide boats or recreational anglers did the fishing in most cases. Occasio nally a guide fished or at least hooked the tarpon for a customer. No attempt was made to influence the angling event, handling methods, o r tackle used to capture fish. This ensured angling techniques and gear would be realistic and consistent with what is normally practiced in the recreational fishery. Professional guides and recreational anglers were all volunteers which was a cost effective way t o sample an exclusive charter fleet in BGP and to observe many vessels at once in TB while directly involving public stakeholders in the fishery science.
28 Trips took place at any time of day, tide, or moon phase and these parameters were recorded for each trip. The following variables were recorded for each sonically tagged tarpon : ), bait type (live, dead, artificial, fly), time of hook up, time of capture (defined as a leader touch with a controlled fish at the side of the boat), handling time (minutes from the leader touch until release, included tagging time), whether or not the angler spent time reviving the tarpon prior to release (yes/no), if the fish was gaffed (yes or no), girth (small, medium, large), estimated total length (in centimeters), estimated weight (in pounds, converted to kilograms), and a qualitative condition of the fish at release (Good, Fair, Poor). A highly active tarpon at the time of suffered from severe disequilibrium (unable to get upri Total lengths were approximated by using pencil marks on the gunnels or eye balling two points along the side of the boat using marks, such as stickers, registration numb ers, scuffs, and then measuring those lengths. Weights were estimated by guides in BGP and by staff in TB. Some anglers, but more specifically guides, did not want staff to measure or handle their fish for more than tagging purposes. Bait types were class ified into four categories: live bait, cut bait, artif icial or fly. breakaway jigs (Figure 2.2A). Live bait was a natural prey item fished alive with spinning or conventional tackle. The following live baits were used in this study: sand perch ( Diplectrum f ormosum ), scaled sardines ( Harengula jaguana ), threadfin herring ( Opisthonema ooglinum ), pinfish ( Lagodon rhomboides ), Atlantic bumper ( Chloroscombrus chrysurus ), shrimp
29 ( Farfantepenaeus spp. ), blue crabs ( Callinectes sapidus ) and pass crabs ( Portunus gibb esi Figure 2.2B). Cut or dead baits were typically menhaden ( Brevoortia spp.), striped mullet ( Mugil cephalus ) or Spanish mackerel ( Scomberomorus maculatus ) fished on the bottom. The number of tarpon hooked and fought was counted for each trip. A fish hooked and fought for less t han three minutes was tallied. Any tarpon fought for three minutes or more was assigned a fish identification number but may not have been caught. For each tarpon assigned a fish identification number, angling duration (total mi nutes from hook up to capture or break off /escape ), coordinates at hookup, time of release, hook location, shark activity, and if the hook was removed were also recorded. Specific hook locations were placed into one of the following categories: upper jaw ( premaxillae, maxillae and supramaxillae sutures), lower jaw (dentary), cheek/head, gills, corner of mouth and surrounding soft buccal tissue, interior mouth (roof, tongue), fins (pectoral, pelvic, dorsal, caudal), eye, deep (gut or esophagus), body, and ot her. A fair or foul hooked designation was assigned to each tarpon prior to analysis. A foul hooked fish was defined as one hooked in a part of the body other than the mouth (Figure 2.3A). Based upon the literature and an understanding of feeding behavio r and functional morphology of tarpon, the premaxillary, maxillary bones comprise the upper jaw and the dentary bone the lower jaw (Grubich 2001, Gregory 2002). Hook locations in these areas were considered fair hooked (Figure 2.3B). The soft buccal membra ne behind the maxillary bone and in the corner of the mouth is inside the jaws of a ta rpon when the mouth is closed. Therefore, tarpon hooked in this soft tissue were also considered to be fair
30 hooked according to our definition. Further clumping combined hook location s in the The first tarpon caught on each trip was tagged with a VEMCO V 22 ultrasonic continuous transmitter using a custom built tagging stick (Figure 2.4 ). Transmitters w ere attached to stainless steel Floy Tag Anchors (model # FH 69) that were slid under a tarpon scale and hooked onto the base of a pterygiophore (Figure 2.5) or into the muscle of the fish approximately two scale rows below and posterior to the base of the dorsal fin so that the tag would not impede the fish when swimming (Figure 2.6). Transmitters of varied frequencies (34 50 kHz) were used in a sequence to prevent overlapping frequenc ies being used simultaneously. Sonically tagged tarpon from BGP had to be initially hooked within the pass boundaries, but did not have to b e landed within the boundaries. After tagging the guide or angler handled the fish as they normally would and then released it for tracking. Floats were used beginning in 2003 to enable a transmitter to float to the surface and eliminated the possibility of assigning mortality to a stationary signal from a tag that had fallen out of the fish which would b e resting on the bottom o therwise (Figures 2.4 and 2.6). The floats also aided in tr acking some of the fish visually when the tag signal was poor. Immediately following release, a tagged tarpon was manually tracked for up to 6 hours from a separate research vessel staffed with state biologists to evaluate short term survival. The direct ion of the signal from the tracking boat was determined using a VEMCO V 11 directional hydrophone, VR 60 rec eiver, and a magnetic compass. Based on testing performed in Tampa Bay, the audible range of the tags under ideal conditions in open water was appro ximately one mile.
31 At the time of release and every subsequent quarter hour during each tracking event, GPS location (latitude and longitude), signal direction from the tracking boat, and fish behavior based on swimming activity levels and movement relati ve to current speed and other schools of tarpon were recorded. Starting in 2003, if a signal stopped moving operated vehicle (ROV) was deployed from the research vessel in an attempt to visually confirm the suspected mortality. Tracking continued until the fate of the fish was established, the signal was lost, or the tracking period expired. After the initial tracking event was over, opportunistic monitoring for frequencies of recently tagged fish took place on subsequent days within the zones of the subsequent trips until the termination of the estimated battery life (~3 weeks). Statistical Analysis Tarpon trip and catch data were summarized and analyzed to estimate catc h and release mortality rates of tarpon tagged in Boca Grande Pass and Tampa Bay area. Count data of mortalities and survivors between Tampa Bay and Boca Grande Pass were compare Data were then combined to obtain an overall c atch and release mortality rate for tarpon from both estuaries to represent the central and southw est Gulf coast tarpon fishery. Parametric Student T tests duration (min), handling times (min), and estimated fish size (cm) between estuaries and of tarpon that survived versus those that died. A non parametric Wilcoxon two sample between bait types (artificial and live), hook type (circle vs. J), foul hooking (fair or foul),
32 Exact tests. Analyses wer e performed using SAS vs. 9.2. Plots of individual tarpo n movement were prepared using GIS (ArcView). V ector maps indicating the direction of the strongest signal heard from each 15 minute waypoint (boat position) were created for each tagged fish. By cross referencing the variables time of day, bearing and di rection of signal, tidal stage, and recorded fish behaviors at each data point, one could further assess fish movement. For each tarpon, survival was determined as a yes or no classification and specified whether or not it was a visually confirmed mortalit y. All visually confirmed mortalities and suspected mortalities were included as deaths when calculating catch and release mortality rates. Criteria used to determine a suspected mortality were the cessation of signal movements in the field verified with p ost season analyses of vector maps and consideration of the incidence of shark a ctivity at the time of tagging. Results Research staff took a total of 207 trips from 2002 2007 to sonically tag and track tarpon from Boca Grande Pass ( BGP ) and Tampa Bay (TB) and estimate catch and release mortality rates for the gulf coas t recreational tarpon fishery. Observations came from 70 different fishing vessels, 36 in BGP and 34 in Tampa Bay. Eighty eight trips took place in BGP. Of the 231 tarpon hooked, 85 (37%) we re caught and 42 of the caught tarpon were tagged with acoustic transmitters and then released (Table 2.1). In TB, 123 tarpon were hooked on 119 trips; 53 (43%) were caught, and 40 of those caught were tagged prior to release (Table 2.1). Two other tarpon were tagged (one in each system), but the tags malfunctioned, were never heard and were removed from any
33 analyses. Catch success for both systems combined was 39%; 37% in BGP and 43% in TB (Table 2.1). A total of 82 tagged tarpon were acoustically tagged during this study to estimate post release mortality rates. The estimated catch and release mortality rate for BGP was 17% (7 out of 42 tarpon died; Table 2.1, Figure 2.7 ) with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 5% to 28% (Wilde 2002). Five of the seve n mortalities in BGP were attributed to shark attacks and two fish were not able to recover from the angl ing event for unknown reasons. The estimated catch and release mortality rate for TB was 10% (4 out of 40 tarpon died; Table 2.1, Figure 2.7 ) with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 1% to 19% (Wilde 2002) Two fish suffered mortality as a result of shark predation and two tarpon suffered mortality from the inability to recover from the angling event (Table 2.1). The combined catch and release morta lity estimate for both locations was 13% (11 out of 82 tarpon died; Figure 2 .7) with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 6% to 21% (Wilde 2002). Of the eleven mortalities (confirmed and suspected ) sharks were responsible for seven of them (64%) and acc ounted for 9% of the total catch and r elease mortality (Table 2.1). Sources other than predation accounted for 36% of the mortalities (4 out of 11). Ancillary observations noted that twelve of the tagged and released tarpon from Tampa Bay were lip gaffed a nd one of those twelve suffered immediate post release mortality (Figure 2.6 A an d B). No significant differences were found between the counts value=0.5203); therefore, data we re combined to evaluate the potential ly lethal effects of other variables associated with catch and release angling. Samples size is limited to detect statistical differences in mortality between estuaries. Power tests reveal ed 636
34 observations would be ne ede d to achieve a power of 0.7. Regardless the proportion of survivors in each estuary was similar, so combining them to represent the Gulf coast fishery is acceptable. Excluding the seven deaths attributed to shark predation from the calculation reduces the estimated catch and release mortality to 5.3% (4 out of 75 tarpon; Table 2.1). A verage a ngling duration (length of fight) was not different between estuaries (Wilcoxon, p value =0.134) and ranged between 4 and 139 minutes (Figure 2.8). The average an gling duration in BGP was 21.2 minutes 20.3 S.D. (14.9 to 27.5, 95% confidence intervals) and 24.3 minutes 23.3 S.D (16.9 to 31.7, 95% confidence intervals) in TB. Pooled data for both systems yielded an average angling duration of 22.7 minutes 2 1.7 S. D (17.9 to 27.5, 95% confidence intervals). No significant differences were observed between average fight times of fish that survived and those that died (Wilcoxon, p value = 0.340, Table 2.2). Boat side h andling times (time of capture until release) ranged between 0 and 7 minutes a nd were not significantly different between estuaries (Wilcoxon, P value=0.588). The average handling time of tagged tarpon observed from pooled data was 2.3 minutes 1.6 S. D (1.9 to 2.7, 95% confidence intervals). No sign ificant differences were observed between average handling times of fish that lived and those that died (t test, p value=0.168, Table 2.2). Estimated total lengths of tarpon that were caught, tagged and released in this study ranged between 91cm and 245c m, and average fish size was not significantly different between estuaries (t test, p value=0.309; Figure 2.9). The a verage size of tagged tarpon in BGP was 161.9cm 31.1 S. D (152.2 to 171.6, 95% confidence intervals) and
35 155.1 cm 27.6 S. D (145.7 to 1 64.4, 95% confidence intervals) in TB. The average size of tagged tarpon from pooled data was 158.8cm 29.6 S. D (152 to 165cm, 95% confidence intervals). No significant differences were observed between average total lengths of tarpon that survived and t hose that died (t test, p value=0.1375, Table 2.2). There was no significant difference between the proportions of observed Test, p value=0.1655; Table 2.3). Tw enty six tagged tarpon were caught using artificial baits, 52 tarpon were caught using live bait, two were caught using cut or dead bait, and two bait types were not ob served at the time of tagging. Both tarpon caught using cut bait survived. No tarpon wer e caught on fly. There was no association between using circle hooks or J hooks and the A total of 22 tagged tarpon were caught on circle hooks, 53 were caught o n J hooks, and five caught with each hook type suffered mortality (Table 2.3). Three tagged tarpon were caught with treble hooks and one of those fish died (Table 2.3). F our hook types were not noted at the time of tagging. Foul hooked tarpon had a signi ficantly higher mortality rate than tarpon fair hooked in the jaw or roof of the p value=0.0187; Figure 2.10). Nine tarpon out of 79 were classified as being foul hooked (11.4%), 70 tarpon were classified as being fair hooked, and three hook locations were not recorded at the time of tagging. Four of the 9 foul hooked fish died (44.4%). Specific hook locations of the foul hooked ta rpon can be found in Appendix A.
36 T he swimming condition of a tarpon at relea se is critical to its s urvival. A total of 33 of the tagged tarpon were highly active at the time of release (good), 30 were classified as being released in fair condition (moderately active) and sixteen were released in poor condition (Figure 2.11). The release condition was n ot observed for three tarpon in this study and they were removed from analysis. Percent morta lity was highest (37.5%) for tarpon released in poor condition and there were significant differences among the counts of observed mortalities of tarpon released a t varying conditions value=0.0173). Tracking periods were planned to last 4 to 5 hours (240 to 300 minutes) in order to estimate the short term catch and release mo rtality rates of tarpon. The average track time in Boca Grande Pas s was 178 minutes (Range: 0 to 525) and the average track time of tagged tarpon from Tampa Bay was 140 minutes (Range: 0 to 300). In BGP, 2003 had significantly lower average tracking times than the other two years in the pass ( mean 119 minutes, t test p= 0.04 ), and in TB, 2007 had the lowest average track times ( mean 94 minutes, t test p= 0.003). Plots created from the tracking data were used to evaluate short term movmements and survival. Several tarpon swam away upon release but return ed to the releas e vicinity within the short term tracking period (Figure 2.12) or up to days later ( Figure 2.13 ). Subsequent monitoring for signals was opportunistic and not part of the formal sampling protocol, but provided evidence for l ong term (>24 hours) survival. Ex cluding the eleven mortalities, 23 out of 71 (32 %) surviving tarpon were h eard again on subsequent days. In BGP, signals were reacquired for 13 out of 35 surviving tarpon (37%). In Tampa Bay, 10 of the 36 (28%) tarpon classified as having survived the shor t
37 term tracking period were heard again on subse quent days (Figure 2.12). R eacquired signals also helped to verify that a tarpon survived the short term tracking time when it was not tracked the full term (Figure 2.13). A summary of tarpon movements can be found in Appendix B Discussion U ltrasonic telemetry was successfully used as a tool to actively track tarpon post release and estimate short term mortality rates for the Gulf Coast fishery. Because this was an observational and not experimental study there was little replication of exact types of gear and tackle used; however, the data came from 70 different fishing v essels between the two systems. Hundreds were watched while waiting for successful tarpon catches. Catch success was less than 40%, so many tarpon break off before t hey get to the boats. These methods also provided a realistic view of the fishery ( i.e. fish handling practices and fight times) by utilizing direct angler involvement in the research (Siepker et al. 2007). The only other st udy to date that estimated short term post release tarpon mortality, had several limitations including observin g a small number of fish angled within a single season (May 25 to July 12, 1992) from the geographically small location of Boc a Grande Pass (Ed wards 1998). Only one of these fish died. This research was the first to observe tarpon from two geographic areas along the Gulf coast during six consecutive seasons (2002 2007) and estimated short term catch and release mortality rates that ranged between 5.3% and 13.4%. Despite its coverage in time and space, the estimates may still be low as only post release survival of tagged tarpon was estimated. There were cases in which tarpon were attacked by sharks during the fight and could not
38 be tagged In ot her cases caught tarpon were observed being attacked post release but had not been tagged because another fish was already being tracked. Such data were not used in this analysis. Short term mortality in this study was defined as mortality within the firs t six hours post release Sharks (sharp nose 1.5 hours, Gurshin and Szedlmayer 2004; scalloped hammerhead 2 hours; Mako 30 90 minutes, blue 3 hours, Skomal 2006) tunas (skipjacks 90 minutes, bluefin 120 minutes, Skomal 2006) and billfish (marlin, 4 to 6 ho urs, Block et al. 1992) were all able to recover from physiological disturbances caused by angling within 6 hours. A mortality study on bonefish showed most fish died within the first 30 minutes post rel ease (Cooke and Philipp 2004). A study on oxeye tarpo n (<300mm) showed recovery from angling effects was fast (<1 hour) when the fish was allowed to swim sustainably and access the air during recovery (Wells et al. 2003). Edwards (1998) witnessed his only tarpon mortality at 1.5 hours post release. Basedon o n previous studies that evaluated lethal and sublethal effects of angling on several active marine species, six hours should be an adequate time to determine short term survival. Manual tracking was often shorter than the proposed six hour window and prov ed to be challenging and labor intensive to complete. Transmitter signals were sometimes difficult to receive due to acoustic interference from both man made and natural causes: boat traffic, waves, submerged metal or concrete structures, depth sounders, s andbars, swimming behaviors of the released tarpon, and dense schools of fish m aking them difficult to track. Shortened t rack times were also partially driven by staff experience. Both years in which that new staff took over tracking procedures (2003 in BG P, 2007 in TB), significantly lower average tracking times were encountered than the other two
39 years from each respective system. In addition, storms, opposing wind and tides, and equipment failure in 2007 caused several trips to end before the desired tra cking period expired and resulted in the lowest averag e tracking times of the study. Other times the tarpon swam away so quickly that keeping up with the fish would have required breaking or bending the hydrophone pole in the boat side mount (Figure 2.13). Despite these obstacles, a coustic telemetry proved to be a valuable tool to track movements and survival of tarpon The range of e stimated tarpon mortality rates in this study were comparable to rates measured for other popular inshore species along the Gulf coast such as spotted sea trout (7.3%, Matlock et al. 1993; 4.6%, Murphy et al. 1995), red drum (4.1%, Matlock et al. 1993; 7%, Murphy et al. 1995), and common snook (2.13%, Taylor et al. 2001). The seemingly higher mortality rate of tarpon compared t o these inshore species may simply be attributed to the use of net pens when monitoring fishes post release which excluded predat ion and biased results. The use of net pens is not feasible with large tarpon. If predation was excluded from the analysis, the result ing catch and release mortality rate was 5% in both systems. T arpon mortality was more similar to rates measured in other large, coastal pelagic species such as sailfish (12.5%, Jolley and Irby 1979), bluefin tuna (16%, Skomal et al. 2002), sharpnos e sharks (10%, Gurshin and Szedlmayer 2004), blue marlin (11%, Graves et al. 2002; 22%, Kerstetter et al. 2003), black marlin (12.5%, Pepperell and Davis 1999), striped marlin (29% Domeier et al. 2003), and white marlin (range varied by hook type 0 35%, Ho rodysky and Graves 2005). Several of these works reported shark predation (Jolley and Irby 1979, Pepperell and Davis 1999, Kerstetter et al. 2004 ) or mention it as a possibililty ( Horodysky and Graves 2005).
40 Sharks were identified as the primary cause of p ost release tarpon mortality. All and all but one of the lethal attacks occurred within the first 20 minutes post release. Incidence of shark attacks varied within a nd between seasons and was unpredictable. However, if sharks were present and feeding, most tarpon were at risk. A study in the Bahamas showed bonefish, the other predominantly catch and release game fish in Florida, released into waters with high abundanc e of sharks and barracuda had mortality rates as high as 39% (Cooke and Philipp 2004). If estuaries were examined separately tarpon in BGP had a higher incidence of fatal shark attacks than did t arpon in Tampa Bay (Table 2.1). While not designed to evalua te predation rates, this study clearly identified predation as the primary cause of post release tarpon mortality. A potential concern for indirect mortality related to the tags was whether or not sharks could hear the ultrasonic signals but this was un likely The sonic tags used in this study operated in the ultrasonic frequency range of 20 k Hz and 200 k Hz (kilohertz) which wa s above the hearing range that has been measured in sharks ( 20 100 Hz (hertz ), Casper and Man n 2006, Casper and Mann 2009). It i s more likely that the sharks were able to detect the vibrations or noise from a hooked tarpon or sense the olefactory cues being released from a distressed or bleeding fish (Smith 1992, Bleckmann and Hoffmann 1999, Dallas et al. 2010). The shark and tar pon predator prey interaction has been documented in southwest Florida and BGP history for more than 100 years (Mygatt 1890, Dimock 191 5 ). Early t arpon tagging research near BGP ceased due to excessive shark predation (Breder 1939 and 1944) yet shark s are not unique to southwest Florida. Reports of large sharks
41 attacking tarpon in Homosassa, along East Coast beaches and in the Florida Keys are common. Studies designed to evaluate localized predation effects, that have been suggested as being influential on diminishing local stocks in areas with dense aggregations of tarpon and anglers (Cooke et al. 2006), could be addressed in future work Until then, i t becomes a matter of angler ethics to move their fishing activity to another location when shark attack incidence is high. I n the short term, some released tarpon survived observed shark attacks which were contrary to expectations. One fish from BGP was attacked by a shark 67 minutes after its release while swimming northward along the beach of Gasparilla Is land then rapidly swam into the Gulf faster than it could be tracked ,. This fish was presumed to live in the short term, but may still have died Another tarpon tagged in TB was tracked offshore where researchers aboard the tracking vessel witnessed the t agged tarpon in the jaws of a hammerhead shark a bove the surface of the water. Almost immediately after the sighting , but this time researchers kept up with the signal Minutes into th is portion of the track, this tarpon rolled at the surface to gulp air and the transmitter was visually observed by staff in the tarpon. Such air breathing activity added a visual verification component to the acoustic tracking and was observed in 19 tagg ed tarpon in TB and anecdotally noted in BGP. Air breathing post release its ability to use atmospheric oxygen to supplement its oxygen debt incurred during the fight as was observed with ox eye tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides (Wells et al. 2003, Wells et al. 2007). Neither of these tarpon was detected when listening for opportunistic subsequent signal acquisition. Formal monitoring for long term survival was not part of
42 ol, so measurements of delayed mortality that might have occurred from the shark attacks remain unknown. D elayed mortality was another reason why mortality rates herein might be underestimated. R eacquired signals from 32% of the tagged tarpon on subseque nt days confirm ed a more long term (>6 hours) post r elease survival, but formal studies on delayed mortality are needed Popup archival satellite tags may be more appropriate for estimating long term survival through large scale movements and migrations. Such tagging programs are already in place using this technology on tarpon (Luo et al. 2008) and have been successfully used in other large marine fishes such as billfishes (Graves et al. 2002, Prince et al. 2002, Kerstetter et al. 2003, Kerstetter et al. 2004; Horodysky and Graves 2005), tunas (Skomal 20 07), and sharks (Skomal 2006). In addition, the use of passive telemetry arrays in these major passes (BGP and TB) would further evaluate long term survival based on movement patterns during spawning season and post spawning season, and would provide new and useful information on the biology of the species. Not all post release mortality is caused by sharks. Of the four tarpon that did not die from predation, two experienced gill damage one from two sets of treble hooks and one from the captain handling the fish thro u gh the gill arches (Table 2.3), and two ot hers died from causes unknown. Neither of the latter two fish showed any exterior sign of physical damage, but individual variation in fitness, stren gth and condition all play a role in fish survival (Kieffer, 2000). Angling techniques, bait type, hook characteristics and type, tackle configuration, and degrees of disorientation and exhaustion achieved during the fight are all examples of other factors that can have a cumulative impact and
43 potentially lethal consequences for fish (Wood et al. 1983, Edwards 1998, Kieffer 2000, Arlinghaus et al. 2007). Average angling duration, handling times, and size (total length) of the tagged tarpon had no significa nt effect on survival. The tarpon that experienced the longest angling duration in this study (139 minutes) was not exhausted at release, but quite agitated, and swam so fast that staff could not follow i t (Figure 2.13). Power tests indicated that sample s ize limited the ability to detect a true effect of handling time (power = 0.51) or total lengths (power = 0. 44 ) on tarpon mortality if one existed. Doubling the number of observed mortalities (n=22) in this study would increase the power of the test s to m ore than 0.8 for both variables Despite this low statistical power, handling times were short on average ( ca. two minutes ) which included time spent tagging the tarpon and most fish survived It was observed that some anglers and particularly guides rar ely, if ever, handled their fish and many people were unsure about the tagging process at the start of the project in each system. Only large adult tarpon were targeted for this study so the non significant effect of total lengths on mortality was not sur prising. Tarpon in Florida sexually mature at sizes of approximately 128.5 females and 117.5 for males (Crabtree et al. 1997) and only four tagged fish were sm a ller than this (Figure 2. 9) Bait type (artificial versus live) showed no significant effect on post release tarpon survival, however, observations were limited (power=0.24) A power analysis indicated that a sample size of 2 78 or 362 t arpon would need to be tagged and tracked t o increase the power of the test to 0. 8 or 0.9, respectively In general, artificial baits tend to shallow hook fish relative to natural baits (Muoneke and Childress 1994, Cooke and
44 Suski 2005), and several studies have found no difference in post release mortality between artificial and live bait type s (Matlock et al. 1993, Murphy et al. 1995, Malchoff and Heins 1997, Nelson 1998, Taylor et al 2001, Cooke et al. 2001 ). Hook type also showed no effect on tarpon survival. In the literature, circle hooks have been shown to have a pro pensity of shallow hooking fish in the corner of the mouth and can be of a greater benefit for survival in some species (Orsi et al. 1993, Prince et al. 2002, Skomal et al. 2002, Cooke et al. 2003, Cooke and Suski 2004, Aalbers et al. 2004, Horodysky and G raves 2005, Prince et al. 2007, Vecchio and Wenner 2007). Limiting anglers to a specific hook type when fishing for large tarpon may not be necessary based on this study, but again, it is important to note that our observations were limited (power=0.27) T ests of statistical power indicated that a sample size of 306 hook type observations would have been adequate to achieve a power 0. 9 to detect a difference in t arpon survival at the observed proportions of 0.77 and 0.91 Hook location had a significant e ffect on post release survival C alculated tarpon foul hooking rates (11%) were comparable to those calculated for other marine fisheries (13% Lukacovic 2001, 3% Prince et al. 2002, 7%, Falterman and Graves 2002 3% Skomal et al. 2002, 17% Grover et al. 20 02, 9% Caruso 2000) and results agreed with other studies on marine and freshwater species that found f oul hooked fish had higher mortality rates than fair hooked fish (Murphy et al 1995, Schill 1996, Nelson 1998, Taylor et al. 2001, Millard et al. 2003, Kerstetter and Graves 2006, Alos et al. 2008, Grixti et al. 2008, Grixti et al. 2010). However, most hook locations resulting in fatalities from these works were attributed to deep hooking the fish ( i.e. in vital organs). Only two tarpon were deep hooked in this study and both were caught on live bait (Appendix A)
45 In both cases, fishing lines were cut and the hooks remained in the tarpon which has been shown to increase survival in other fish species (Schill 1996, Aalber s et al. 2004, Fobert et al. 2009). The tarpon not revived prior to release was and emphasized t he importance of short term survival. Tarpon relea sed in poor condition (no swimming ability or with severe disequilibrium) suffered a significantly higher percent mortality, although individual variation in resilience was evident. Other research concluded that the release condition of fish significantly affects survival (Cooke and Philipp 2004, Horodysky and Graves 2005, Danylchuk et al. 2007a, Prince et al. 2007). A swim ming fish is likely better able to avoid predation upon release (Cooke and Philipp 2004, Danylchuk et al. 2007b) rise to the surface to breathe air if it needs to (Wells et al 2003, Seymour et al. 2003) or regulate itself for optimal swimming speeds needed for faster recover y (Milligan et al. 2000, Farrell et al. 2001) Based on results of those studies, i f a caught tarpon suffers from s evere disequilibrium or is unable to swim from exhaustion incurr ed during the fight, an angler sh ould be encouraged to wait un til the fish regains some equilibrium and can swim before it is released. S mall changes to increase the chance of survival can mak e large differences in overall population sizes in species with a periodic life history strategy, such as tarpon (Schroeder and Love 200 2, Winemiller and Dailey 2002). One lingering question relative to tarpon survival revolves around the use of lip gaffs to control tarpon at the side of the boat (Figure 2.6A and B). Based on a prey capture feeding study on Atlantic tarpon (Grubich 2001) it is unlikely that a tarpon
46 gaffed around the lower jaw at the center of the dentary bone would have its feeding perma nently a ffected by the pierced tissue. The only gaffed tarpon that died in this study was the one caught and released with extensive gill damage from treble hooks (Table 2.3). All other gaffed tarpon survived in the short term and some were conf i rmed to ha ve survived on the long term. Other indirect evidence that supported gaffs were safe for handling large tarpon was provided by the successful gaff ing, transport ing and survival of six adult tarpon to captivity for physiology studies (Chapter 3 herein ). Furt her investigations into the effects of gaffing may be warranted. Other types of data are also missing from this study. Lethal and sub lethal effects of lifting large fish into a boat were not assessed. None of the fish from BGP and only one in TB (Figure 2.6A) were lifted from the water and brought into the boat which was The law requiring angler s in Florida to have a $50.00 permit to possess the tarpon legally probably reduces the amoun t of tarpon handled in this manner, but some anglers choose to do so Two other unknowns are the effects of tournament weigh in procedures that involve towing tarpon long distances to weigh scales and excessive boat noise on tarpon beha vior, physiology and survival. Studies on largemouth bass show both factors can cause significant lethal and sub lethal physiological responses (Weathers and Newman 1997, Suski et al. 2004, Graham and Cooke 2008). Conclusions This was the first study to estimate catch and r elease mortality rates and relate specific factors associated with angling to tarpon survival from more than one area over multiple years. Shark predation which is sometimes unavoidable, was the primary cause
47 of tarpon mortality and all but one of the fat al attacks happened in the first 20 minutes post release. Factors other than predation affecting mortality in 34% of the tagged tarpon were likely attributed to physical and physiological damages experienced by the tarpon during the angling event. Hook lo cation and the condition of a tarpon at the time of release significantly affected mortality. A foul hooked tarpon or one released in poor condition significantly reduce d it s chances for survival. Angling duration, handling time and estimated total lengths of these tagged tarpon did not significantly affect survival. At this time, to restrict anglers to a certain hook type (circle or J) or bait type (natural or live) does not appear to be justified, but more observations not confounded with predation are ne eded to make stronger statistical conclusions. Most tarpon in this study survived cach and release fishing on the short term when released in the absence of large predators In addition, the probablility of catching a hooked tarpon was less than 50%, so many fish escape. This i mpl ies there c ould be a sustainable adult catch and release if adequate numbers of fish recruiting to the adult spawning population and limited harvest However, the lethal effects c atch and release ang li ng on juvenile tarpon from, and the effects of harvest in other countries are all unknown. Several C entral and South American countries support Atlantic tarpon subsistence fisheries ( Ault et al. 2008 ) In a dditon tagg ing studies reported in Luo et al (2008) and genetic diversity suggests (McMillen Jackson et al. 2005) there is connectivity between tarpon in the western Atlantic that crosses international boundaries Finally, an estimate of the population size
48 is also needed to determine whether or not the estimated catch and release mortality rates from this study are sustain a b le If ent is forecasted to increase and fishing pressure in the tarpon recreational fishery con tinues to increase e ffects of angling on tarpon survival should be monitored. It would be prudent to periodically repeat this work to determine if post release mortality rates have increased or remained the same. Acoustic telemetry can be used as a tool t o evaluate catch and release mortality rates of fishes, particularly for large pelagic or migratory species difficult to maintain in pens for observation Literature Cited Aalbers,S.A., Stutzer,G.M., and Drawbridge,M.A. 2004. The effects of catch and rel ease angling on the growth and survival of juvenile white seabass captured on offset circle and J type hooks. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 24: 793 800. Alos,J., Cerda,M., Deudero,S., and Grau,A.M. 2008. Influence of hook size and type on short term mortality, h ooking location and size selectivity in a Spanish recreational fishery. J.Appl. Ichthyol. 24: 658 663. Arlinghaus,R., Cooke,S.J., Lyman,J., Policansky,D., Schwab,A., Suski,C.D., Sutton,S.G., and Thorstad,E.B. 2007. Understanding the complexity of catch and release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev Fish. Sci. 15: 75 167. Ault,J.S., Humston,R., Larkin,M.F., Perusquia,E., Farmer,N.A., Luo,J., Zurch er,N., Smith,S.G., Barbieri,L.R., and Posada,J.M. 2008. Population dynamics and resource ecology of Atlantic tarpon and bonefish. In: J.S.Ault, (ed.). Biology and management of the world tarpon and bonefish fisheries. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp. 216 258. Ba rbieri,L.R., Ault,J.S., and Crabtree,R.E. 2008. Science in support of management decision making for bonefish and tarpon conservation in Florida. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and management of the world tarpon and bonefish fisheries. CRC Press, pp. 399 404
49 Bleckmann,H. and Hofman,M.H. 1999. Special senses. In: W.C. Hamlett,(Ed.). The biology of elasmobranch fishes: Sharks, skates and rays. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 300 328. Block, B.A., Booth, D.T. and Carey F.G 1992. D epth and temperature of the blue marlin, Makaira nigricans observed by acoustic telem etry. Mar. Biol. 114: 175 183. Breder,C.M. 1939. On the trail of the tarpon. Bulletin The New York Zool. Soc. XLII: 99 108. Breder,C.M. 1944. Materials for the study of the life history of Tarpon atlanticus. Zool. 29(3): 217 252. Caruso, P.G. 2000. A comparison of catch and release mortaliy and wounding for striped bass ( Morone saxatilis ) captured with two baited hook types. Mass. Div. of Fish. 15p p. Casper,B.M. and Mann,D.A. 2006. Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark ( Ginglymostoma cirratum ) and the yellow stingray ( Urobatis jamaicensis ). Envir. Biol. Fish. 76: 101 108 Casper,B.M. and Mann,D.A. 2009. Field hearing measurements of the Atlantic sharp nose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae J. Fish. Biol. 75: 2768 2776. Cooke,S.J., Philipp,D.P., Dunmall,K.M., and Schreer,J.F. 2001. The influence of terminal tackle on injury, handling time, and cardiac disturbance of rock bass. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag 21: 333 342. Cooke,S. J., Schreer,J. F., Dunmall,K. M., and Phillip, D. P. 2002. Strategies for quantifying sublethal effects of marine catch and release angling: Insights from novel freshwater applications. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catc h and release in marine recreational fisheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society 30, pp. 121 134. Cooke,S.J., Suski,C.D., Barthel,B.L., Ostrand,K.G., Tufts,B.L., and Phillip,D.P. 2003. Injury and mortality induced by four hook types on bluegill and pumpkinseed. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 23: 883 893. Cooke,S. J. and Phillip, D. P. 2004. Behavior and mortality of caught and released bonefish ( Albula spp.) in Bahamian waters with implications for a sustainable recreational fishery. Biol. Co nserv. 118: 599 607. Cooke,S.J. and Suski,C.D. 2004. Are circle hooks an effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch and release fisherie? Aquat. Conserv. 14: 299 326.
50 Cooke,S.J. and Suski,C.D. 2005. Do we need species spe cific guidelines for catch and release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources? Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 1195 1209. Cooke,S.J., Danylchuk,A.J., Danylchuk,S.E., Suski,C.D., and Goldberg,T.L. 2006. Is catch and release recreatin onal angling compatible with no take marine protected areas? Ocean Coastal Manag. 49: 342 354. Crabtree,R.E., Cyr,E.R., Chacon Chaverri,D., McLarney,W.O., and Dean,J.M. 1997. Reproduction of Tarpon, Megalops atlanticus from Florida and Costa Rican Waters and Notes on Their Age and Growth. Bull. Mar. Sci. 61: 271 285. Dallas,L.J., Shultz,A.D., Moody,A.J., Sloman,K.A., and Danylchuk,A.J. 2010. Chemical excretions of angled bonefish Albula vulpes and their potential use as predation cu es by juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris J. Fish. Biol.77: 947 962. Danylchuk,A.J., Danylchuk,S.E., Cooke,S.J., Goldberg,T.L., Koppelman,J.B., and Philipp,D.P. 2007a. Post release mortality of bonefish, Albula vulpes exposed to differe nt handling practices during catch and release angling in Eleuthera, The Bahamas. Fish Manag. Ecol. 14: 149 154. Danylchuk,S.E., Danylchuk,A.J., Cooke,S.J., Goldberg,T.L., Koppelman,J.B., and Philipp,D.P. 2007b. Effects of recreational angling on the post release behavior and predation of bonefish ( Albula vulpes ): The role of equilibrium status at the time of release. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 346: 127 133. Dimock, A.W. 1915. Florida Enchantments. Peekamose, NY. 338 pp. Domeier,M.L., Dewar,H., and Nasby Lucas,N. 2003. Mortality rate of striped marlin ( Tetrapturus audax ) caught with recreational tackle. Mar Fresh Res. 54: 435 445. Edwards,R.E. 1998. Survival and movement patterns of released tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus ). Gulf of Mexi co Sci. 16: 1 7. Falterman, B. and Graves, J. E. 2002. A preliminary comparison of the relative mortality and hooking efficiency of circle and straight shank ("J") hooks used in the pelagic longline industry. AFS: National Symposium on Catch and Release in Marine Recreational Fisheries 30, pp. Farrell,A.P., Gallaugher,P.E., and Rutledge,R. 2001. Rapid recovery of exhausted adult coho salmon after commercial capture by troll fishing. Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci. 58 : 2319 2324.
51 Fedler, T. 2011. The economic impact of recreational tarpon fishing in the Caloosahatchee River and Charlotte Harbor region of Florida The Everglades Foundation Report. Gainesville, FL. 20 pp. Fobert,E., Meining,P., Colotelo,A., O'Connor,C.O., and Cooke,S.J. 2009. Cut the l ine or remove the hook? An evaluation of sublethal and lethal endpoints for deeply hooked bluegill. Fish Res. 99: 38 46. Graham,A.L. and Cooke,S.J. 2008. The effects of noise disturbance from various recreational boating activities common to inland wate rs on the cardiac physiology of a freshwater fish, the largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides ). Aquat. Conserv. 18: 1315 1324. Graves,J.E., Luckhurst,B.E., and Prince,E.D. 2002. An evaluation of pop up satellite tags for estimating postrelease survi val of blue marlin ( Makaira nigricans ) from a recreational fishe ry. Fish. Bull. 100: 134 139. Gregory,W.K. 2002. Fish Skulls: A Study of the Evolution of Natural Mechanisms. Kreiger Publishing Co., Malabar, Florida. Grixti,D., Conron,S.D ., Morison,A., and Jones P.L. 2008. Estimating post release survival and the influential factors for recreationally caught black bream ( Acanthopagrus butcheri ) in the Glenelg River, south eastern Australia. Sci. Dir. 92: 303 313. Grixti,D., Conron,S.D., a nd Morison,A. 2010. Post release survival of recreationally caught snapper, Pagrus auratus in Port Phillip Bay, south eastern Australia. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 17: 1 9. Grover, A. M., Mohr, M. S., and Palmer Zwahlen, M. L. 2002. H/R mortality of Chinook salmon from drift mooching with circle hooks: management implications for California's ocean sport fishery. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society 30, pp. 39 56. Grubich,J.R. 2001. Prey capture in Actinopterygian fishes: A review of suction feeding motor patterns with new evidence from an elopomorph fish, Megalops atlanticus Amer. Zool. 41: 1258 1265. Gurshin,C.W.D. and Szedlmayer,S.T. 2004. S hort term survival and movments of Atlantic sharpnose sharks captured by hook and line in the north east Gulf of Mexico. J. Fish. Biol. 65: 973 986. Horodysky,A.Z. and Graves,J.E. 2005. Application of pop up satellite archival tag technology to es timate postrelease survival of white marlin ( Tetrapturus albidus ) caught on circle and straight shank ("J") hooks in the western North Atlantic recreational fishery. Fish.Bull. 103: 84 96.
52 Humston,R., Ault,J.S., Larkin,M.F., and Luo,J. 2005. Movement s and site fidelity of the bonefish Albula vulpes in the northern Florida Keys determined by acoustic telemetry. Mar.Ecol. Prog. Ser. 291: 237 248. Jolley,J.W. and Irby,E.W. 1979. Survival of tagged and released Atlantic sailfish ( Istiophorus platypterus : Istiophoridae) determined with acoustical telemetry. Bu l l. Mar. Sci., 29: 155 169. Kerstetter,D.W. and Graves,J.E. 2006. Survival of white marlin ( Tetrapturus albidus ) released from commercial pelagic longline gear in the western North Atlantic. Fish Bull. 104: 434 444. Kerstetter,D.W., Luckhurst,B.E., Prince,E.D., and Graves,J.E. 2003. Use of pop up satellite archival tags to demonstrate survival of blue marlin ( Makaira nigricans ) released from pelagic longline gear. Fish. Bull. 101: 939 948. Kerstetter,D.W., Polovina,J.J., and Graves,J.E. 2004. Evidence of shark predation and scavenging on fishes equipped with pop up satellite archival tags. Fish. Bull. 102: 750 757. Kieffer,J.D. 2000. Limits to exhaustive exercise in fish. Comp Biochem. Physiol. Part A 126: 161 179. Lukacovic,R. 2001. An evaluation of deep hooking rates and relative hooking efficiency of several styles of circular configured hooks. In: Weinrich, D.R., P.G. Piavis, B.H. Pyle, A.A. Jarzynski, J.C. Walstrum, R.A Sadzinski, E.J. Webb, H.W. Rickabaugh, E. Zlokovitz, J. P. Mower, R. Lukacovic and K. A. Whiteford Bay.Federal Aid Project F 54 R. Annual Report, Department of the Interior, Fis h and Wildlife Service. Luo,J., Ault,J.S., Larkin,M.F., Humston,R., and Olson,D.B. 2008. Seasonal Migratory Patterns and Verticle Habitat Utilization of Alantic Tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) from Satellite PAT Tags. In: J.S.Ault(ed.).Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisheries. CRC Press, pp. 275 299. Malchoff,M.H. and Heins,S.W. 1997. Short term hooking mortality of weakfish caught on single barbed hooks. N. A m. J. Fish. Manag. 17: 477 481. Matlock,G.C., McEachr on,L.W., Dailey,J.A., Unger,P.A., and Chai,P. 1993. Short term hooking mortalities of red drums and spotted seatrout caught on single barb and treble hooks. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 13: 486 189.
53 Mazeaud,M.M., Mazeaud,F., and Donaldson,E.M. 1977. Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Tran s. Am. Fish. Soc. 106: 201 212. McMillen Jackson,A.L., Bert,T.M., Cruz Lopez,H., Seyoum,S., Orsoy,T., and Crabtree,R.E. 2005. Molecular genetic variation in tarpo n ( Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes) in the northern Atlantic ocean. Mar. Biol. 146 : 253 261. Millard,M.J., Fletcher,J.W., Mohler,J., Kahnle,A., and Hattala,K. 2003. Mortality associated with catch and release of striped bass in the Hudson River. Fish Mana g. Ecol. 10: 295 300. Milligan,C.L., Hooke,G.B., and Johnson,C. 2000. Sustained swimming at low velocity following a bout of exhaustive exercise enhances metabolic recovery in rainbow trout. J. Exp. Bio. 203: 921 926. Muoneke,M.I. and Childress,W.M 1994. Hooking mortality: a review for recreation al fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2 : 123 156. Murphy,M.D., Heagey,R.F., Neugebauer,V.H., Gordon,M.D., and Hintz,J.L. 1995. Mortality of spotted seatrout released from gill net or hook and line gear in Florida. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 15: 748 753. Mygatt,O. A. 1890. A good day's tarpon fishing. Outing XV(5), pp. 323 331. Nelson,K.L. 1998. Catch and release mortality of striped bass in the Roanoke river, North Carolina. N. Am. J. Fish .Manag. 18: 25 30. Oppel,F. and Meisel, T. 1987. Tales of old Florida. Castle Press. Seacaucus, N.J. Orsi,J.A., Wertheimer,A.C., and Jaenicke,H.W. 1993. Influence of selected hook and lure types on catch, size, and mortality of commercially troll caught C hinook salmon. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 13: 709 722. Pepperell,J.G. and Davis,T.L.O. 1999. Post release behavior of black marlin, Makaira indica caught off the Great Barrier reef with sportfishing gear. Mar. Biol. 135: 369 380. Pollock,K.H. and Pin e,W.E. 2007. The design and analysis of field studies to estimate catch and release mortality. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14: 123 130. Prince,E.D., Ortiz,M, and Venizelos, A. 2002. A comparison of circle hook and "J" hook performance in recreational C/R fis heries for billfish. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society 30, pp. 66 79.
54 Prince,E.D., Snodgrass,D.J., Orbesen,E.S., Hoolihan,J.P., Serafy,J.E., and Schratwieser,J.E. 2007. Circle hooks, 'J' hooks and drop back time: a hook performance study of the south Florida recreational live bait fishery for sailfish, Istiphorus platypterus Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14: 173 182. Schill,D.J. 1996. Hooking Mortality of Bait Caught Rainbow Trout in an Idaho Trout Stream and a Hatchery: Implications for Special Regulation Management. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 16: 348 356. Schroeder,D.M. and Love M.S. 2002. Recreational fishing and marine fish populations in California CalCOFl Rep. 43: 182 190. Seymour,R.S., Bennett,M.B., and Christian, K. 2003. Gills and air breathing organs of the tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides : gas exchange morphometry and physiological responses to aquatic hypoxia and exercise. Comp. Biochem Physiol. Part A 134, S116. Siepker,M.J., Ostrand,K.G., Cooke,S.J., Phillip,D.P., and Wahl,D.H. 2007. A review of the effects of catch and release angling on black bass, Micropterus spp.: implications for conservation and management of population s. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14: 91 101. Skomal, G. B. 2006. The Physiological effects of capture stress on post release survivorship of sharks, tunas and marlin. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston, MD, USA: Boston University, 304pp. Skomal,G.B. 2 007. Evaluating the physiological and physical consequences of capture on post release survivorship in large pelagic fishes. Fish Manag. Ecol. 14: 81 89. Skomal,G.B., Chase,B.C., and Prince,E. D. 2002. A comparison of circle hook and straight hook per formance in recreational fisheries for juvenile atlantic bluefin tuna. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society 30, pp. 57 65. Smith,R.J.F. 199 2. Alarm signals in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2: 33 63. Sundstrom,F.L., Gruber,S.H., Clermont,S.M., Correia,J.P.S., De Marignac,J.R.C., Morrissey,J.F., Lowrance,C.R., Thomassen,L., and Oliveira,M.T. 2001. Review of elasmobranch behavioral studies using ultrasonic telemetry with spatial reference to the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris around Bimini Island. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 225 250
55 Suski,C.D., Killen,S.S., Cooke,S.J., Kieffer,J.D., Phillip,D.P., and Tufts,B.L. 2004. Physiological significance of the weigh in during live release angling tournaments for largemouth bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133: 1291 1303. Taylor,R.G., Whittington,J.A., and Haymans,D.E. 2001. Catch and release mortality rates of common snook in Florida. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 21: 70 75. Vecchio,J.L. and Wenner,C.A. 2007. Catch and release mortality in subadult and adult red drum captured with popular fishing hook types. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 27: 891 899. Weathers,K. C. an d Newman,M. J. 1997. Ef fects of organizational procedures on mortality of largemouth bass during summer tournaments. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 17, 131 135. Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., Baudinette,R.V., Christian,K., and Bennett,M.B. 2003. Oxygen transport capacity in the air breathing fish, Megalops cyprinides : compensations for strenuous exercise. Comp. Bioch. Physio. Part A 134: 45 53. Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., Christian,K.A., and Farrell,A.P. 2007. Air breathing minimizes post exercise lact ate load in the tropical Pacific tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides Broussonet 1782 but oxygen debt is repaid by aquatic breathing. J. Fish Biol. 71: 1649 1661. Wilde,G. R. Estimation of catch and release fishing mortality and its sampling variance. 3rd Wor ld R ecreational F ishing C onference, 83 85. 5 21 2002. Winemiller,K.O. and Dailey,W.H. 2002. Life history strategies, population dynamics, and consequences for supplemental stocking of tarpon. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 35: 81 94. Wood,C.M., Turner, J.D. and Graham M.S. 1983. Why do fish die after severe exercise? J. Fish Biol. 22: 189 201.
56 Table 2 .1 : A summary of sonic tagging trips in Boca Grande Pass (BGP, 2002 2004) and Tampa Bay (TB, 2005 2007) performed to estimate catch and release mort ality rates for the recreational Atlantic tarpon fishery along the central and southwest Gulf Coast. The table presents totals by estuarine system (BGP and TB) and the cumulative total (TOTAL) for the entire study. Numbers represent the number of trips tak en, the number of tarpon hooked, the number of tarpon hooked that were fought for less than (<) and greater than or equal to ( ) 3 minutes, the number of tarpon caught (defined by a leader touch) and released, the percent of hooked tarpon caught the numbe r of tarpon tagged, the number of assigned mortalities (confirmed and suspected) and the estimated mortality rate (percent) The number of deaths attributed to shark attacks and other non pre datory causes and associated mortality rates (percentage) are al so presented. BGP TB TOTAL Trips 88 119 207 Hooked 231 123 354 Fought < 3min 79 29 108 152 94 246 Caught 85 53 138 Percent Caught 3 7 43 39 Tagged 42 40 82 Mortalites (%) 7 (1 7) 4 (10) 11 (13 ) Sharks (%) 5 (13 ) 2 (5 ) 7 (9 ) O ther (%) 2 (5 ) 2 (5 ) 4 (5 )
57 Table 2.2 : A summary of angling duration (minutes), boat side handling times (minutes), and estimated total lengths (centimeters) for tarpon that were tagged, tracked and released in Boca Grande Pass (n=42) and Tampa Bay (n=40 ) from 2 002 2007 Variable means, standard errors (Std. Err. ) and minimum (Min) and maximum (Max) values are presented for tarpon that survived and those that suffered mortality. Mean handling time and total lengths were compared with Student T tests Wilcoxon non normal two sided test. No significant differences (N.S.) were observed between average angling duration handling times, or fish size between tarpon that lived and those that died. Angling Duration (min ) Survivor Mortality df p value Mean 23.7 16.5 80 0. 340 Std. Err. 2.7 3.3 N.S. Min 4 5 Max 139 40 Handling Times (min ) Survivor Mortality df p value Mean 2.2 3.2 78 0. 168 Std. Err. 0.2 0.7 N .S. Min 0 0 Max 7 7 Est. Total Length (cm) Survivor Mortality df p value Mean 160.8 146.5 75 0.138 Std. Err. 3.4 11.0 N.S. Min 91 92 Max 245 218
58 Table 2. 3 : Field data for the eleven acoustically tagged tarp on recorded as mortalities (suspected and confirmed) in Boca Grande Pass (BGP ) and Tampa Bay (TB ) from 2002 2007. Variables incuded are date of capture, angling duration (Fight, in minutes), estimated total length (TL, in centimeters), bait type (artificia l: breakaway jigs (ABJ) and MirrOlures, or live bait), hook type (circle (C), straight shank (J), or treble (T)), hook location, condition of tarpon at release (Good, Fair, Poor assigned as a qualitative measure of tarpon activity level at release) and o bservational notes on the catch and release event. Date Fight (min) TL (cm) Bait Type Hook Type Hook Location Condition at Release Field Observations BGP 5/7/2002 10 152 ABJ C Jaw Fair At time of release, captain said the fi sh didn't look good. T he fish swam slowly against the current for some time therefore alive. Then it sl owly drifted with the current. Eventually the signal stopped moving and stayed in the same gene ral area for about three hours. Fish was presumed dead Since the mortality was unconfirmed, it is possible that the tag could have fallen out of the fish. No floats in 2002. 6/24/2002 19 160 ABJ J Cheek Poor Fish handled and held for tagging between gill arches. At time of tagging, the fish did not flinch. Revival of fish was attemp ted over ~ 50yds. Eventually, fish responded but was not doing well. It came back up to surfa ce twice but didn't move much. Tag signal essentially stayed in the same area in which the tracking fish to be dea d. 6/4/2003 14 120 ABJ J Jaw Poor Shark Attack The tag was returned later; it had teeth marks and slashes in the float.
59 Tab le 2.3 : Continued. Date Fight (min) TL (cm) Bait Type Hook Type Hook Location Condition at Release Field Observations BG P 6/1/2004 5 130 ABJ C Cheek / Head* Good Shark Attack witnessed 6/4/2004 40 180 ABJ C Jaw Good Shark Attack witnessed 7/9/2002 5 109 Live J Jaw Good Suspected shark attack. First tarpon hooked on trip was attacked on the line during the fight. A t release time for the tagged tarpon, the captain was worried about sharks. He ran boat in fast circles to scare away t h e sharks. After release, fish was moving very slowly; tracking boat followed the "very strong" signal, wh ich just suddenly disappeared. Tracking boat searched two m ore hours and found no signal. It vanished. 5/8/2003 9 150 Live J Jaw Poor Shark Attack. Camera deployed once signal stopped moving and carcass caught on video. (isthmus) This was a secondary hook location Fish was origin ally hooked on the upper jaw.
60 Table 2.3 : Continued. Date Fight (min) TL (cm) Bait Type Hook Type Hook Location Condition at Release Field Observations TB 7/24/2006 9 92 Live J Deep Poor Shark Attack. Captain held fish for tagging. Line w as cut and hook retained because fish was deep hooked. Fish not resuscitated because of a double hook up in vessel, and they went to catch the second tarpon. Tagged fish slowly sank on release, but came to when it hit bottom, rose and gulped air twice and then swam off. Shark attack occurred three hours post release. 8/4/2006 20 178 MirrOlure T Gills Fair Treble hook in the gills. Plug left in fish, much bleeding. Fish swam slowly and steadily and gulped four times in first 5 minutes post release. Then it did three sideways glances rising in water but making it just beneath the surface. Final view was head up and tail down when it sank. S ignal did not move after that. A storm prevented deployment of the ROV.
61 Table 2.3 : Continued. Date Fight (m in) TL (cm) Bait Type Hook Type Hook Location Condition at Release Field Observations TB 5/3/2007 22 122 Live C Jaw Poor Hook position was not seen; no resuscitation performed on fish. It was handled for 6 7 minutes boatside before tagging. Fish m ade 4 rapid gulps at 12 minutes post release. Then it made three more gulps within a two minute interval which ended in a large blow out of bubbles from the mouth at the surface. A minute later it came up sideways to th e surface. A final minute later was i ts last breath when it rolled flat and sank like a log. Signal never moved again. Tag later recovered on rocks by Skyway Bridge. 6/14/2007 29 218 Live C Jaw Poor Suspected mortality from shark attack incurred during fight. Fish bleeding and missing scales whe n tagged. Inactive at release. Hammerhead chasing seemed to have slowed down but then signal disappeared. Fish signal was not found or heard from again presumed to be dead based on condition of fish at release and the active sharks in the area.
62 A. B. Figure 2 1 : Study areas for evaluating catch and release tarpon mortality. The boundary of Boca Grande Pass (BGP) as defined by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is located at the mouth of Charlotte Harbor along the southwest co ast of Florida and also supports a popular recreational tarpon fishery ( A grey box on inset). The Tampa Bay area tarpon fishery is located along the central west coast of Florida and is distributed throughout the bay and adjacent Gulf of Mexico beaches f rom Longboat Key to Anclote Key ( B black box on inset ). Phosphate Dock
63 A. B. Fig ure 2.2 : Examples of artificial lures and live baits used in the catch and release mortality study in Tampa Bay and Boca Grande Pass (2002 2007). Artificial lures used included D.O.A. bait busters, and breakaway jigs (A). Pass crabs and blue crabs are natural prey items commonly used for bait as seem in tarpon s tomach contents (B) Images used with permission from the FWC FWRI.
64 A. B. Figure 2.3 : Hook location s observed in tarpon. Image of a foul hooked tarpon that was hooked in the cheek (A) and a tarpon skull with arrows depicting fair hook location s that were observed in the sutures bet ween the premaxillae, maxillae and supramaxi llae bon es of the upper jaw (B). Images used with permission from the FWC FWRI.
65 Figure 2 .4 : Custom built tagging stick loaded with an ultrasonic transmitter and attached orange and white float for tagging tarpon. Inset shows stainless anchor tag. Figure 2.5 : An x ray of a tagged tarpon The stainless Floy anchor firmly lodged on a dorsal fin pterygiophore. Pterygiophores were faint and have been enhanced by the lines drawn over them. Inset is image of a V 22 transmitter with attached ancho r. Images used with permission from the FWC FWRI.
66 A. B. C Figure 2. 6 : Images of sonically tagged tarpon from Tampa Bay (A, B) and B oc a Grande Pass (C ) Transmitters in Tampa Bay were sleeved by the float as opposed to followed by the float in BGP All three tarpon presented here survived the short term tracking period despite handling differences. Image s used with permission from FWC FWRI (A) and Robert McCue (C)
67 Figure 2.7 : Percent catch and release mortality calcul ated for Boca Grande Pass (BGP blue fill ), Tampa Bay (TB red outline ) and both study areas (TOTAL, grey fill) combined (2002 2007). s were used to determine significance of the observed mortality rates based on cou nt frequencies. There were no significant differences in observed tarpon mortalities between estuaries ( Exact, p value=0.5203 ). Numbers over the bars in plots represent the number of assigned mortalities per total number of tagged tarpon in that category ( i.e. 7 out o f 42 tagged tarpon died in BGP).
68 Figure 2.8 : Angling duration (in minutes) for each of the 82 tagged and tracked tarpon in Boca Grande Pass (BGP blue fill ) and Tampa Bay (TB red outline ) during 2002 2007. Fight times were not significantly different between estuaries (Wilcoxon, p value = 0.134).
69 Figure 2. 9 : Estimated total length frequencies (in centimeters) for 78 of the 82 tagged and tracked tarpon in Boca Gr and e Pass (BGP blue fill ) and Tampa Bay (TB red outline ) during 2002 2007. Mean tarpo n lengths were not significantly different between estuaries (t test, p value = 0.309).
70 Figure 2.1 0 : Percent mortality calculated for fair and foul hooked tarpon from TB and BGP (n=79). A fair hooked tarpon was defined as one hooked in any part of th e mouth or jaw (Premaxillary, maxillary, corner, and roof of the mouth). A foul hooked tarpon was one hooked in the head, cheek, fins, gills or deep inside the throat or gut. Foul hooked tarpon experienced significantly h igher mor t ality rates than fair hoo ked tarpon ( Exact p value=0. 0187 ). Plot details are as in Figure 2.7
71 Figure 2.1 1 : Percent mortality calculated for three assigned qualitative conditions based releas e in TB and BGP (n=79). A Tarpon released in poor condition had a significantly higher p ercent mortality rate than tarpon released in good and fair conditions ( Exact p value=0.0 173 ). Plot details are as in Figure 2.7
72 Figure 2. 12 : R epresentative plot of post release movement of a tagged tarpon tracked in lower Tampa Bay at the S unshine Skyway Bridge. The inset map indicates the area where the tarpon remained for the latter portion of its track in a thick school of baitfish Filled colored points represent on date(s) the signa l was heard and are shown overlaid on a GIS depth contour map. Arrows with tarpon silhouettes exemplify its path in chronological order.
73 Fig ure 2.13 : R epresentative plot of post release movement of a tagged tarpon hooked in Egmont Channel north end of Egmont Key in Tampa Bay. The signal was lost after 30 minutes of tracking because the research vessel could not keep up with swimming speeds The tarpon was detected two weeks later in Southwest Channel (green point). Symbol details as in Figure 2.12.
74 C HAPTER THREE : PHYSIOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES OF TWO SIZE CLASSES OF TARPON ( Megalops atlanticus ) IN RESPONSE TO CATCH AND RELEASE ANGLING Introduction Fishes ex hibit a physiological response when subjected to the acute stress of exhaustive exercise, such as that experienced by a fish when it is being angled These responses are often sub lethal metabolic and osmotic disruptions (Mazeaud et al. 1977) that are typically more exaggerated than in higher vertebrates (Wells et al. 1986, Wood 1991, Kieffer 2000). Severe, acute and chronic stressors have been shown to elevate post release mortality in some studies (Black 1958; Wood et al. 1983) while o ther studies showed no effect of exhaustive exercise on mortality (Booth et al. 1994; Cooke et al. 2001). Researc h shows that the primary and secondary physiological r esponse s (Mazeaud 1977) and recovery of fish es after exercise may be affected by air exposure during handling (Ferguson and Tufts 1992; Cooke et al. 2001), the size of the fish (Childress and Somero, 19 90; Somero and Childress, 1990; Ferguson et al. 1993; McDonald et al. 1998), the water temperature at the time of capture (Wilkie et al. 1996 and 1997), the life history stage of the fish being caught (Tang and Boutilier, 1991; Brobbel et al. 1996), and it s ability to swim while recovering (Milligan et al. 2000 Wells et al. 2003 ). The se studies have predominantly focused on freshwater species and
75 salmonids that undergo stress from hatchery rearing and during spawning migrations. Limited but recently expan ding physiological work has been performed on saltwater spec ies such as sablefish (Davis and Parker 2004), halibut (Davis and Shreck 2005), silver trevally (Wells and Baldwin 2006), various species of tunas, marlins and sharks (Skomal 2006 and 2007), bone fish (Suski et al. 2007, Danylchuk et al. 2007, Cooke et al. 2008) and oxeye or Pacific tarpon (Wells et al. 2003, Seymour et al. 2003, Wells et al. 2007 ). Because of the inconsistency among physiological responses of fishes to exhaustive exercise or angli ng, species specific investigations need to be made (Cooke and Suski 2005). There are currently no published physiological data on Atlantic tarpon. Atlantic tarpon, a predominantly catch and release fishery in the United States is world renowned and sou ght after because of its exaggerated response to angling. Their size, strength, acrobatic prowess and stamina on various tackle make tarpon an excellent model to Large a dult tarpon in excess of 70 pounds (32 kg) are caught throughout Florida as a seasonal fishery that targets sexually mature fish in salt water environments before, during and after their spawning season Sub adult tarpon (sexu ally immature) are much smalle r ( ca. 5 to 3 0 pounds [2 to 9kg] ) and are targeted in the fishery year round in backwater, est uarine, and pond environments. If smaller, sexually immature tarpon are more susceptible to mortality or sub lethal disturbances that could limit their recruitmen t to the next life history stage from catch and release events, it would be prudent to evaluate the response s of both size classes independently
76 In addition, small tarpon are logistically easier to handle than large tarpon and may be subjected to prolon ged air exposure and handling by anglers such as for photographs. Air exposure has been shown to increase physiological recovery time s from exercise (Ferguson and Tufts 1992, Davis and Parker 2004, Suski et al. 2004), disrupt normal behavior (Arlinghaus e t al. 2009, Danylchuk et al. 2007, Suski et al. 2007) and influence post release survival (Gingerich et al. 2007, Arlinghaus and Hallermann 2007) in freshwater and marine fishes. At the same time, tarpon can breathe air, so air exposure may have limited ef fects relative to gill breathers Understanding how large and small tarpon, which represent two different life recreational fishery react to catch and release angling can provide useful information for anglers scientist s and managers to develop methods for best handling practices that minimize physiological disturbance and maximize survival. The objective of this study was to quantify the physiological disturbance in adult and sub adult tarpon in response to catch and release angling. Four specific questions were addressed. First, were there significant physiological disturb ances in adult and sub adult tar pon after angling compared to non stressed fish within size classes? Second, were there significant diffe rences in the physiological disturbance between size classes after angling? Third, did angling followed by sixty seconds of air exposure while being held horizontally or vertically out of the water prior to sampling cause a physiological response in sub ad ult tarpon that was different from non air exposed tarpon ? And finally, did angling duration, handling time or select environmental parameters significantly influence a potential disturbance in blood chemistry?
77 Methods Tarpon were collected using hook a nd line methods in the Tampa Bay area (all control fish, and angled sub adults) and Boca Grande Pass (angled adults) during 2008 Sub adult tarpon were angled from a salt water pond by volunteer recreational anglers and r esearch staff (May to August). Thes e fish were wild, juvenile tarpon from Tampa Bay that had been entrained in the pond at earlier life history stages and grew to size s where they could not escape. Therefore, these fish were considered representative of wild sub adult tarpon from the local population. Adult tarpon were angled by volunteer recreational anglers a nd clients on guided charters. Adult angling trips took place over the course of a few days to minimize variance in the environmental data (water and air temperature, salinity, dissolv ed oxygen and pH) that could influence blood responses. C ontrol Groups Twelve s ub adult tarpon (<20 pounds 9kg) were transported and stocked into a 3.66m ( 12ft ) diameter, tank at the F lorida Fish and Wildlife e Research Institute Stock Enhancement Research Facility (SERF) in Port Manatee ( Figure 3. 1). S ix adult tarpon ( ca. 31.8 to 54.5 kg ) were transported by boat and truck to the SERF facility, and then stocked into a 9.14m ( 30ft ) diameter fiberglass tank ( Fig ure 3.1). W ater in both tanks was full strength seawater and environmental parameters were monitored daily (Table 3.1). All fish survived the stocking phase. Tarpon were held in captivity until acclimated. Acclimation was defined as the tarpon actively an d voraciously feeding in captivity Small tarpon ate readily and vo raciously. L arge tarpon took up to four weeks to actively feed but then adapted quickly to laboratory conditions Control specimens were not fed for 24 hours prior to
78 phlebotomies (taking blood from a vein by puncturing it with a needle) to reduce the effect of diet in the blood chemistry. To obtain non stressed levels of blood from these large sportfish, a dult tarpon were euthanized by delivering a lethal blow to the brain using .223 cal iber blanks in a power head mounted on a pole spear. One fish per day was removed from the tank for a phlebotomy Sub adult tarpon were not euthanized, but rapidly hand lined from the tank with a baited hook and bled. Previous work on oxeye tarpon ( Megalop s cyprinoides ) showed that rapidly sampled control fish exhibited no statistical differences in their responses compared to cannulated tarpon that were undisturbed at the time of sampling (Wells et al. 1997). This method has also been used with other gener a (Meka and McCormick 2005). At least one hour was allotted between sub adult sampling events to allow the remaining fish in the tank to calm from the sampling event. These fish were dart tagged and released alive. Angling, Handling and Air Exposure Re corded variables for each angling event included the following: hook up time, time landed (defined as a caught tarpon controlled by human hands at the side of a fishing vessel, pond bank, or v tray), pre bleed handling time, total bleed t imes, and total ha ndling time. Angling duration was calculated as the length of the fight from the time of hookup until the tarpon was caught by the angler (controlled boat side by leader, hand, or gaff) or landed in a net. For all treatment s air temperature, water tempera ture, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH was recorded either at the start, during, or end of the sampling day. Environmental variables were not recorded after every angled tarpon was caught because schools of tarpon targeted by anglers typically fed all at once and hook and line capture events occur red in rapid succession
79 during these intense feeding episodes. All variables recorded, created and analyzed in this study are reported and defined in A ppendix C. Angled sub adults were subjected to one of three h andling treatments prior to bleeding : 60 seconds of air exposure while held horizontally out of water (Air H), 60 seconds of air exposure while held vertically out of water (Air V) and no air exposure (NoAir) ( Figure 3. 2). Air exposure duration was chosen as a representative time that a tarpon might be held for photographs in the recreational fishery and was included with the pre bleed handling times for those treatment groups Field D iagnostics and P hlebotomy Phlebotomies were performed using caudal v enipuncture while the tarpon was either inverted on a v tray ( Figure 3.3A) or held boat side in a sling. Scales were removed and approximately 2 to 3 mL samples of blood were drawn into 4 mL BD vacutainers containing lithium heparin using guage needle s. An additional 1 mL sample was drawn into a BD vacutainer (Becton, Dickinson and Company) containing sodium fluoride potassium oxalate from each tarpon. Blood samples were placed on ice slurries until processed. Total bleed times were recorded for each tube and blood p rocessing times were monitored Samples were discarded if they were not spun within 60 minutes of collection. Ninety one percent of the samples were processed in fewer than 40 minutes and 82% in less than 30 minutes. The same biologis t served as the phlebotomist to reduce variation in blood sampling technique. Blood samples were immediately processed in the field. Hematocrit (HCT) levels were measured from whole blood spun in a CritSpin microcentrifuge for two minutes and recorded as t he percent red blood cell volume Small aliquots of whole blood were placed in refrigeration for subsequent hemoglobin (Hb) analyses. Remaining whole blood
80 samples were spun in the Vacutainer tubes for five minutes using a centrifuge. P lasma was pipette d from the tubes, placed into labeled cryovials, and immediately frozen and stored in a dry shipper charged with liquid nitrogen. Upon return to the laboratory, frozen plasma samples were stored in a 76 C fre ezer until further processing. Measured plas ma response variables were as follows: lactate, glucose, cortisol calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphorus and magnesium. Plasma lactate analyses were performed at the Comparative Neuromuscular Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jo lla, CA. Quantification of the remaining plasma parameters and Hb were performed by Antech Diagnostics Laboratory, one of the leading veterinarian analytical laboratories for the eastern United States. Accredited laboratories were used for consistency and because the analytical techniques and equipment follow current standard protocols of the field. T he angling portion of the adult field experiment was repeated because of unexpected results and logistics. Adult tarpon were difficult to handle in situ while lifting the tail high enough out of the water for phlebotomies and the tails were sometimes too t hick for the needle to reach the vein Such issues caused additional handling time multiple needle sticks, and excessive bleed times that may have affected b lood response s and general well being of the fish when performing phlebotomies using caudal venipuncture. In 2009, blood was drawn from branchial v essels in the gill arch es while fish were in the sling (Figure 3.3B) The only difference in methodology was the location of the phlebotomy. Length s and girth of each tarpon were measured to the nearest mm and recorded after hematolo gical samples were taken. A dult fish weights were estimated using the
81 allometric weight relationship for tarpon and conver ted to ki lograms (Babcock 1936). S ub adult fish were weighed to the n earest 0.1g on a scale. If no scale was available, weights were calculated using the same weig ht relationship as for adults. All tarpon were marked using genetic tags (adults) or plastic dart tags (sub adults), revived if necessary, and released. The pond was monitored for subsequent sub adult mortalities. Statistical Analysis Individual tarpon served as the sampling unit. Replication was achi eved by sampling multiple fish. Cortisol and magnesi um were natural log (log e ) transformed for subsequent parametric analyses to meet assumptions of normality. Most other parameters were normally distributed ( Shapiro Wilk, tests were used to compare means between treatment gr oups (angled and control) between angled size classes, and between bleed methods (caudal venipuncture or gill) Test results were compared to results from non parametric two sample Wilcoxon test s in the cases where data were close to normal (Shapiro 95). V alues are presented as arithmetic means one standard error Physiological disturbances among handling treatments of sub adult tarpon were compared with a one way ANOVA adjusted for unequa l samples sizes followed by a post hoc Tukey test ( The mean lengths and weig hts of tarpon and environmental data were also compared for any significant differences between and among treatments The effect of size on angling duration was e valuated with a simple linear regression. Associations and interactions among hematological responses of tarpon from each treatment (angled and control animals) to angling duration, handling time, bleed methods, body size, and v arious environmental varia bles were examined using a non parametric
82 redundancy analysis (RDA) and parametric linear and multiple regressions ( ) Handling times for these models were the sum of pre bleed handling times, 60 seconds of air exposure if applicable, and the total bleed time. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 for Windows. T he number of tarpon used for the RDA w as reduced to only include tarpon for which there were a complete set of field and hematological parameters in order to statistically evaluate the relationship between fish response s and angling characteristics. Data were standardized to Z scores and 1,000 permutations were run using the dataset. The following variables were used as explanatory variables (predictors) in the RDA model: Air Temp (C), Water Temp (C), dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity (SAL), pH, total length (TL), weight, angling duration (Fig htr), bleed method, handling times (BoatH_secs) and handling treatments for each adult tarpon (Percussion and Angled) and sub adult (Air H, A ir V, NoAir, and RS C) tarpon. Ten of the eleven blood parameters were entered as response variables into the m odel and are shown in green. Hemoglobin was excluded from the RDA because of the paucity of these measurements among tarpon that had complete sets of the other measured blood parameters. Distance between points in the biplot showing the first two ordination ax es approximates the similarity of the asured by Euclidean distances. Points represent each tarpon and are labeled with its handling treatment. For predictors, the vector lengths indicate the relative strength of the relationship with the response data. For response vectors, the magnitude is proportional to the contribution that variable makes to the patterns depicted in the multivariate space by the biplot. For both predictor and response vectors, heading indicates the directio n of t he underlying gradient. Angles between the response and
83 predictor vectors (and among predictor vectors) reflect their correlations: correlation is positive when the angle is less than 90 degrees ; correlation is negative when the angle is greater th an 90 de grees. Angles among responses variables are meaningless. Results Sample size and mean values for Atlantic tarpon sizes (length and weight), angling duration, handling times and measured environmental variables for each treatment group are presented in Ta ble 3.1. Values for whole blood HCT and Hb, metabolites lactate and glucose, the hormone cortisol, and six electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, inorganic phosphorus and magnesium) are presented for each angling treatment and non stressed con trol group in Table 3.2. Table 3.3 is a compilation of the statistical comparisons of angling effects between size classes for each blood parameter. The average size of adult tarpon was significantly larger (1855 21.8mm, TL; 49.2 1.9 kg) than that of s ub adult tarpon (602.7 14.0mm, TL; 1.6 0.1kg) used in this study (t test, df=86, p<0.0001, Table 3.1). A ngling W ithin S ize C lass Angling cause d a significant physiological d isturbance in adult tarpon (Table 3.2) H ematocrit (HCT t test, p=0.0007 ) hemoglobin (Hb t test, p=0.0007 ), plasma metabolites lactate (t test, p=0.0004) and g lucose (t test, p=0.0007) and all plasma electrolyte concentrations (t test, p<0.001) were significantly higher in angled (stressed) tarpon than mean levels of the same parameter in non stressed adult tarpon (Control, Table 3.2 ). Plasma cortisol levels were not significantly different between angled and control fish (Table 3.2, t test: P = 0. 4507 ). Angling caused less of a disturbance in sub adult tarpon (Table 3.2). Pos t hoc analyses on sub adult tarpon revealed no significant differences among the three angled
84 handling treatments with and without air exposure and the non stressed control group for concentrations of Hb ( ANOVA, p =0. 536 ) glucose ( ANOVA, p =0. 636 ) cortisol ( ANOVA, p =0. 348 ) calcium ( ANOVA, p =0. 499 ) sodium ( ANOVA, p =0. 686 ) potassium ( ANOVA, p =0. 715 ) chloride ( ANOVA, p =0. 883 ) and inorganic phosphorus ( ANOVA, p =0. 447 ; Table 3.2). Non angled sub adults (RS C) had significantly lower levels of HCT ( ANOVA p=0 .0041) plasma lactate ( ANOVA, p =0.0001 ), and plasma magnesium (ANOVA p=0.0099) than angled treatments, but no differences were observed among the three angling treatments with and without air exposure (Table 3.2). Angling B etween S ize C lasses Samples from the three sub adult handling treatments with and without air exposure were combined for scaling comparisons of angled fish since no significant differences (ANOVA, p>0.05) were observed among handling treatments for any blood parameter Angling produc ed significantly higher concentrations of blood hemoglobin, plasma metabolites lactate and glucose, and most electrolyte concentrations in large tarpon than in small tarpon (Table 3.3) Only HCT and p otassium showed no significant difference between size c lasses of angled tarpon ( Table 3.3 ). Cortisol was significantly lower in large tarpon than in sub adults after angling ( Table 3.3 ). A ngling D uration H andling T ime and E nvironmental P arameters Adult tarpon angling durations (fight) ranged from 5 to 74 minutes and boat side handling times (BoatH) ranged from 77 second s to 1,370 seconds (22.8 min). In sub adult tarpon, angling durations ranged from 0.5 minutes to 7 minutes and pond side handling times ranged from 41 seconds to 874 seconds (14.6 min).
85 Bl eeding large tarpon from the branchial vessels, rather than caudal vessels, significantly reduced the amount of time it took to bleed the fish and reduced the total handling time needed at the side of the boat to obtain a sample and release the fish (Table 3.4, Appendix C). B oat side handling times were on average about three minutes shorter and bleed times were more than two times faster when tarpon were bled using the gill method. Whole blood parameters (Hb, HCT) and plasma potassium and phosphorus conce ntrations were the only response variables to differ between bleeding methods (Table 3.4). A total of 64 tarpon had a complete set of field and hematological parameters and were used for the RDA. Results for the primary and secondary axes in the RDA bipl ot showed that 60.55% of the total variance in the observed data was accounted for by this model (adjusted r squared = 0.633, p = 0.001; Figure 3.4). Th e first axis accounted for approximately 50% of that total variance. Scaled predictor vectors (red ) indi cate d that the most influential explanatory variables on the collective blood responses of plasma lactate, glucose, calcium, chloride, phosphorus, and magnesium in angled tarpon of both size classes were angling duration (Fight), handling times (Boat H _secs ), tarpon size (weight and total length) and bleed method (Figure 3.4) Linear regression models for tarpon size and multiple regression models for individual blood parameters by angling duration and handling times supported the RDA results. Larger tarpo n took significantly longer to catch (n=73, Adj. R 2 =0.4 04, p value<0.001; Figure 3.5). In the case presented for plasma lactate, longer angling duration and handling time resulted in increasing lactate concentrations in adult tarpon
86 (Figure 3.6), and a si gnificant interaction of angling duration and handling time on the lactate response was observed in sub adult tarpon (Figure 3.7). Tarpon from the three sub adult ang ling treatments with and without air exposure were positively correlated in their respons es and clustered together on the biplot (Figure 3.4). The only angled sub adult tarpon that responded similarly to the angled adult tarpon experienced the longest fight time (NoAir, within dashed circle). Cortisol levels were higher in smaller angled tarpo n, but did not appear to be correlated to angling duration or handling times (Figure 3.4). Potassium and HCT showed little relationship with fight time, handling time, size, or angling treatment, but were slightly associated with air and water temperatures Tarpon from the two control groups (Percussion and RS C) clustered together and were separate from tarpon subjected to angling (Figure 3.4). A few RS C tarpon, however, exhibited similar blood responses as angled sub adults with and without air exposur e (inserted horizontal arrow, Figure 3.4). Adult control tarpon (Percussion) were correlated with lower water and air temperatures. Environmental parameters in general did not account for much variability in the observed blood responses of angled fish. V ectors of the environmental parameters were short in length and aligned with the secondary axis that only accounted for an additional 10% of the total variation in the observed response data (Figure 3.4) There were some differences in water quality betw een the control tanks and the pond and Gulf water at the time of sampling Sub adult t ank water had a higher salinity (ANOVA, p=0.001), cooler water temperatures (ANOVA, p=0.004), and lower pH (ANOVA, p=0.0001) than the pond water but these variables were not significantly
87 different among the three angled sub adult treatments (Table 3.1). No significant difference was observed for air temperatures or DO levels between the pond and tank water at the time of phlebotomies (ANOVA, p>0.05). A ngled adult tarpon came from Gulf of Mexico water with significantly higher salinities (t test, p=0.0001), pH (t test, p=0.0001), and water temperatures (t test, 0.0012) than the control tank water at the time of sampling (Table 3.1) There was no difference in DO levels b et ween the tank and Gulf water. Air temperatures were significantly coole r (t test, p=0.0006) at the time we sampled the control group (October) compared to air temperatures when we a ngled the adults ( May and June Table 3.1). No short term mortality (<6 h ours) was observed with caught and released sub adult tarpon. Delayed mortality of one angled tarpon was observed 43 h ou rs post release ( 1 out of 28 fish) Eight out of 27 sub adults (30%) were recaptured throughout the 2008 sampling season. Discussion Acute stress in fish such as that experienced when a fish is angled, typically elicits a stress response (Mazeaud et al. 1977) that is a culmination of how a tarpon functions and responds given its intrinsic and extrinsic environment These responses can be quantified and evaluated physiologically by monitoring the changes a fish makes to adapt and cope with the stress relative to the stressor (Barton et al. 2002, Wikelski and Cooke 2006, Arlinghaus et al. 2007). This wa s the first study to quantify physio logical disturbances in two distinct life history stages of Atlantic tarpon in response to catch and release angling practices associated with the sport fishery and to quantify blood chemistry from non stressed Atlantic tarpon
88 Angling caused significant increases in blood chemistry concentrations in adult tarpon and of select parameters in sub adult tarpon relative to non angled fish. There might have been more significant differences between control and angled treatment groups of sub adult tarpon had on ly one fish per day been rapidly sampled from the control tank. The rapidly sampled control fish that exhibited similar blood responses as the angled sub adult tarpon (horizontal arrows on RDA biplot) were actually instances where that tarpon was the secon d or third fish out of the tank on a given sampling date. All tarpon in the tank reacted and became agitated when the baited hook was dropped to remove the first fish of the day. The first rapidly sampled tarpon on a given date elicited responses that plac ed them among the adult control tarpon (Percussion) on the biplot. Results indicated that one hour was probably not adequate time to allow the remaining tarpon in the tank to return to resting levels. Measured whole blood responses were similar to the cong ener Megalops cyprinoides and other high energy fishes. Atlantic tarpon of both size classes showed similar mean HCT levels at rest and after angling (Table 3.2), but percentages after angling were quite variable and ranged from 28% to 58% Wells et al. (1 997) also found HCTs in oxeye tarpon was quite variable and ranged between 15% and 40% and in a subsequent study determined, mean resting HCT level to be 37.6% that increased to 51.9% after exercise ( Wells et al. 2003) Post exercise HCT values from this study (Table 3.2) were also similar to post exercise HCT values of high energy pelagic fishes observed by Skomal (2006) in bluefin tuna (44%), albacore (48%) and bonito (49.9%), and slightly higher than values observed by Wells and Baldwin (200 6) in silve r trevally (35.6%).
89 Hemoglobin (Hb) the red blood cell protein that increases the carrying capacity of RBCs for oxygen (Houston 1990) while not significant ly different among the sub adult treatment groups in this study, did increase in adult tarpon afte r angling ( Table 3.2 ). Sub adult Atlantic tarpon that were a similar size to oxeye tarpon studied by Wells et al. (2003) had similar Hb levels t o those measured in oxeye s at rest ( 11.69g/dL ) and after exercise ( 14.3 g/dL ) H owever, large Atlantic tarpon e xperienced higher post exercise Hb levels than oxeyes (Table 3.2) response to an increased oxygen demand as a result of anaerobic activity. One explanation for the increase in HCT is that the red blood cells themselves were swelling from the internal electrolyte imbalance However, since both parameters increased after angling, Atlantic tarpon may be releasing new red blood cells from the spleen to increase blood oxygen carryin g capacity (Brill et al. 2008) as a response to being angled Earlier work by Wells et al. (1997) determined that oxeye tarpon have higher resting Hb and HCT levels than some fishes, and a high oxygen carrying capacity. Since Atlantic tarpon values were s imilar to those in oxeye tarpon the same is true for them. This plays a key role in how a tarpon can rid the acid built up in its system during stress or exercise and recover from it. Lactate produced in response to oxygen debt and the high energy deman ds of anaerobic metabolism during glycolysis ( Dobson and Hochachka 1987, Wood 1991), exhib ited the most significant increases in response to angling and handling in both size classes of tarpon. O bserved lactate levels from sub adult Atlantic tarpon were si milar to what Wells et al. (2007) observed in oxeye tarpon subjected to varying swimm ing speeds
90 and dissolved oxygen conditions that ranged from 0.8 to 5mmol/L. Compared to non elopomorph fishes, adult tarpon responded similarly to other high energy fish a fter angling or exercise (b luefin tuna 11.7 mmol/L ; a lbacore tuna, 9.1mmol/L; Skomal 2006 ), but not as high as silver trevally after exercise ( 20 mmol/ L, Wells and Badlwin 2006). e obtained in large tarpon from this study (21.68 mmol/L). Sub adult tarpon lactate levels were more similar in response to mako sharks (4.2 mmol/L) and wahoo (4.2 mmol/ L) after angling (Skomal 2006). L actate resting levels in bonefish were low like tarpon ( 1mmol/L ), but when exercised with one minute of air exposure bonefish reached post exercise levels of 6.0 mmol/ L and 8.5 mmol/L and actually peaked two hours later at 14mmol/L under the most stressful experimental conditions of a 4 minute exercise per iod coupled with 3 minutes of air exposure (Suski et al. 2007, Cooke et al. 2008). Many studies indicate that lactate continues to increase post exercise ( Wells et al. 1986, Ferguson and Tufts 1992, Wilkie et al. 1996, Milligan et al. 2000, Davis and Shre ck 2005, Meka and McCormick 2005, Suski et al. 2006 Frick et al. 2010 ) and that air exposure magnifies the response (Ferguson and Tufts 1992, Suski et al. 2004), so it is feasible that tarpon values in this study were not at their peak. In fact, blood sam ples obtained during a tarpon tournament (2010) provided evidence that maximum lactate levels were not obtained during recreational tarpon fishing activities Tournament l actate levels ranged between 8.15 mmol/L and 40.96 mmol/L with a mean of 21.96 mmol/L (Guindon unpublished data). This average tournament lactate concentration was similar to the maximum value (21.68 mmol/L) obtained in the recreational fishery samples.
91 Extreme handling has been demonstrated to exacerbate the magnitude of the stress resp onse in other species for lactate (Thorstad et al. 2003, Meka and McCormick 2005), but also for other hematological parameters, in general, when a fish responded to a stressor (Wendelaar Bonga, 1997, Barton et al. 2002). The tarpon with the maximum lactate level in this study experienced the longest fight time (54 minutes) coupled by the longest pre bleed handling time (9 minutes). The adult tarpon exhibiting the second highest lactate concentration (20.33 mmol/L) was only angled for 20 minutes; however, th is tarpon was towed for fifteen minutes prior to delivering it to staff for sampling. The other two angled tarpon plotted near this point had 15 and 19 minute fight times, were each towed for five minutes prior to sampling, and one of these two tarpon had the longest handling time. These three fish exhibited extreme blood responses (Figure 3.4 and 3.6, tarpon marked with vertical arrows). Towing a tarpon is not typically practiced in the recreational fishery since most fish are caught and released. But for the sake of this study, a few anglers towed their fish to the research vessel to be sampled. Some tarpon tournaments, however, require towing as part of their weigh in procedures. Fishing tournaments, in general, typically are associated with excessive han dling and stress responses in fish often resulting from holding fish alive in pens as part of the weigh in procedures (Suski et al. 2004 and 2006). In the case of tarpon, the capture event, boat side handling, distance towed and weigh in procedures would a ll contribute to confounding any towing specific effects, but results here support the idea that towing is a form of excessive handling that may exacerbate observed stress responses and merits further investigation.
92 Hyperglycemia, the increase of plasma glucose, has been used a s a stress indicator in fish es (Mazeaud et al. 1977, Wood 1991 Wendelaar Bonga 1997), and is expected with angling (exhaustive exercise). Excess handling, confinement, and air exposure have also been shown to further increase hyper glycemi c responses in fish (Barton 2000, in Barton et al. 2002). While no differences in glucose concentrations were observed among sub adult handling treatments, including control fish of both size classes, angling and handling cause d hyperglycemia in adu lt tarpon. Angled adult tarpon glucose levels were similar to that observed by Wells et al. (2007) in fast swimming oxeye tarpon under normoxic conditions (117 mg/dL). Earlier work by Wells et al. (2003) on oxeye tarpon similar in size to the sub adult Atl antic tarpon, showed that 15 minutes of e xercise (angling) increase d glucose concentrations in rapidly sampled control fish from 87.3 mg/dL to 93.96 mg/dL, but the increase was not significant, as was observed w ith sub adult Atlantic tarpon. Again, the glu cose response in adult tarpon was similar to other high energy fishes such as endothermic tunas (110 mg/dL) and skipjacks (109.3 mg/dL, Skomal 2006 ). In contrast, tournament sampled tarpon yielded an average glucose concentration of 176 mg/dL (Guindon unpu blished data), a value higher than what was observed in exercised bonefish (162 mg/dL, Suski et al. 2007) and white marlin (145.1 mg/dL, Skomal 2007). Such increases in glucose do suggest a mobilization of other metabolic energy reserved to increase the in Angling caused a noticeable electrolyte disturbance in adult tarpon, but in general, increases in electrolytes were the least extreme compared to other measured parameters. Only small increases in sodium (19%) and ch loride (12%) concentrations were observed after angling adults from the Gulf of Mexico; a common response among teleosts under
93 stress (Cliff and Thurman 1984, Wood 1991, Wendelaar Bonga1997 ). Sodium and chloride branchial exchange is important for the stor age of hydrogen ions to aid recover y from an acid base imbalance in the plasma after a stressor (Wood 1991 ). With the influx of sodium, there is an efflux of hydrogen ions that helps lower plasma. There is also a neutral exchange of chloride with bicarbonate ions (HCO 3 ) out of the fish gills (Wood 1991, Wang et al. 1994). Chloride and magnesium also assist in regulating the affinity between oxygen and Hb (Houston 1990). Increasing plasma chloride concentrations promotes oxygen releas e from the Hb to the plasma so it can travel to body tissues during anaerobic activity (Marshall 2002). Magnesium increased 67% after angling in adult tarpon, and plays a role in contractile pro tein activation which could aid the muscles in maintaining swi mming capabilities against a buildup of lactic acid (Black 1958). Changes in magnesium or calcium may disrupt muscular contractions and neuromuscular nerve transmission and may increase due to leakage from damaged muscle cells (Cliff and Thurman 1984). In or after release could be detrimentally affected. Calcium can be actively taken up from the marine environment using Ca 2+ ATPase and used as a sodium/calcium exchanger where it plays a role in hydromineral balance (Marshall 2002, Wendelaar Bonga 1997), and increased 40% in adult tarpon after angling. Calcium has also been proposed as a means to offset cardiac damage in fish caused by acidaemia (Wells et al. 1986). Inorganic phosphorus, a product of glycolysi s in fishes that accumulates when PCr ( phosphocreatine) is depleted in white muscle (Dobson and Hochachka 1987, Hochachka 1991), increased 72% after angling in adult tarpon. This suggests that these fish were utilizing anaerobic activity as a result of the fight. The resultant acid load encountered
94 from the anaerobic activity requires ionic regulation to assist with recovery of the fish (Dobson and Hochachka 1987, Dubois and Dubielzig 2004), and all of these electrolytes work collectively not independently toward regaining acid base balance and osmotic homeostasis (Wood 1991) P otassium was the one salt that was similar among angled tarpon regardless of size class or handling treatment. These values were similar to values in bonefish after angling (5 mEq /L) and when angling was followed by a minute of air exposure (5.2 mEq/L; Suski et al. 2007). Other w ork done in situ on bonefish also showed no consistent potassium in creases after angling ( Cooke et al. 2008 ). Lowest potassium levels were observed in adul t control fish and the RDA revealed a correlation with decreasing potassium levels and decreasing water and air temperatures. The adult control fish were sacrificed during fall (October) when air and water temperatures were significantly cooler than when a dult angled fish were sampled. In general, responses of electrolytes are very species specific and inconsistent in their responses as discussed in Suski et al. (2007). Overall, angled adult tarpon showed similarity to the responses observed in ectothermic tunas for potassium, sodium, chloride, and phosphorus, but calcium responded more like endothermic tunas and marlins (Skomal 2006). S everal studies have shown that recovery of ionic imbalance is rapid and electrolyte levels are often back to their non str essed values within the first 4 hours post release (Booth et al. 1994 Suski et al. 2004 and 2006 Wells et al. 2003) ; however, this remains and unknown for Atlantic tar pon and needs to be evaluated. We observed no evidence of significant ionic increases among sub adult angling treatment s (Air H, Air V, NoAir) except for magnesium. Angled sub adults from the
95 pond may have experienced slight increases in ion concentrations that went undetected relative to control fish because of the salinity differences bet ween the tank and pond. The mean salinity of water in the control tanks for sub adults was significantly higher than the salinity varied with rainfall. Based on its vector in the RDA biplot, salinity played a significant role in the observed blood responses of both size classes of tarpon (Figure 3.4). None the less, there were no observed differences among sub adult angling treatments from the pond, so air exposure and handling of a tarpon vertically or horizontally had little bearing on electrolyte responses. Cortisol was the only parameter that did not show a significant increase with angling and was lower in adults than in sub adults. Th is was an unexpected result since cort isol release is a primary stress response in animals (Mazeaud et al. 1977 Wendelaar Bonga 1997 Mommsen et al. 1999 ), and given that all other parameters significantly increased after angling adult tarpon. Potential explanations for the cortisol results a re varied. The ability to respond to stressors develops at early life history stages (Brobbel et al. 1996, Barton et al. 2002, Ricklefs and Wikelski 2002) and Wendelaar Bonga (1997) stated that early life history stages are more sensitive to cortisol than later stages (adults). The observed differences between the two size classes of tarpon may be attributed to the sub adults being a nave population relative to adult tarpon of Boca Grande Pass that have been previously exposed to boat noise, angling pressu re, repeated capture, and predator abundance in their environment which are all known fish stressors (Barton et al. 2002, Arlinghaus et al. 2007). Bursts of exercise experienced during angling events may be no different than bursts of activity required to avoid predation or capture prey;
96 therefore, angling a tarpon may not elicit a different physiological response that these other behaviors. These types of comparisons of catch and release angling to other routine behaviors is lacking in the literature (Cook e and Schramm 2007). There are a number of wildlife examples where animals can exhibit phenotypic plasticity or endocrine control (Ricklefs and Wikelski 2 002, Wikelski and Cooke 2006). Cortisol, a hormone, is under endocrine control so a tarpon may be ab le to suppre ss its release. There are advantages to doing so. Fish have been shown to reduce the cortisol response during the reproductive period which can already be physiologically stressful to the animal (Wendelaar Bonga 1997), and the adult tarpon were sampled during peak spawning season. Other studies have shown that the a bsence of cortisol production allow ed faster acid base recovery, repletion of muscle glycogen, and lactate depletions to pre exercise levels (Milligan et al. 2000, Eros and Milligan 1 996) and reduced the total recovery time when sustained swimming followed exercise ( Milligan et al. 2000 ). Oxeye tarpon allowed to swim freely after release with access to the air (for breathing) physiologically recovered some of its blood parameters in le ss than an hour but cortisol was not measured (Wells et al. 2003). It could simply be that the cortisol response was delayed (Gamperl et al. 1994, Suski et al. 2006, Kieffer 2000) or as a potential worst case scenario, that sampled adult tarpon were unde r chronic stress where plasma cortisol can fall back to the resting levels, even though the fish may still be responding to the stressor of being angled (Vijayan and Leatherland, 1990). This remains an area of future work. Scaling E ffects of A ngling Th ere were significant scaling effects on the physiological disturbances of angled tarpon that were more extreme in larg e tarpon than
97 in small tarpon. This agrees with results from other wildlife (Bennett et al. 1985) and fishery studies (Somero and Childres s 1990 Ferguson et al. 1993, Wang et al. 1994 Brobbel et al. 1996) that evaluat ed the scaling effects of body mass on s tress responses using blood chemistry W ork by Childress and Somero (1990) found length to be more relevant in the observed scaling pa tterns of muscle enzymes, not mass or weight but for tarpon, length and weight contributed to the total explained variation in the observe d blood responses (Figure 3.1). A ngling H andling T ime Air E xposure and the E nvironment Results from this work in dicate d that minimizing angling and handling times in tarpon can reduce the overall physiological disturbance. There was intra species variation in physiological res ponses to stressors in tarpon. Angling duration and total handling time (boat side or pond side) were treated as stressors on tarpon of two size classes in the RDA model. B ased on vector magnitudes, t otal handling time (BoatH_secs) was less influential on the tarpon blood responses than angling duration (Fig ht) or bleed method Had all tarpon be en bled at the gill arches, handling and bleed times would have been further reduced potentially lessening the effect of sampling and handling time on the observed responses. I mplementing the use of more field portable diagnostic tools (Cooke et al. 2008) could potentially reduce h andling and processing times even further. Bleeding large tarpon from the branchial vessels in a gill arch should be used for further physiology studies on large tarpon. Air exposure has been shown to exacerbate fish stress resp onses and cause gill lamellae to collapse and gill filaments to adhere to one another which compromise s the surface area available for gas exchange (Ferguson and Tufts 1992, Graham 1997 ). Tarpon
98 are air breathers, which may explain the lack of an effect of air exposure on physiologic response. Other studies showed prolonged air exposure altered swimming behavior after release ( Danylchuck et al. 2007 Gingerich et al. 2007 ). Some of the air exposed su b adult tarpon lost equilibrium when bleed times were prol onged. In such cases, the tarpon were turned upright and held in the pond until t hey regained equilibrium and swam away. One fish that experienced an extreme total handling time of 17 minutes be cause of difficulty in bleeding suffered from severe equilib rium loss on release and died in the pond 43 hours post release. No other angled sub adults experienced delayed mortality and short term survival within the first 6 hours post release was high (100%). T hree other sub adult mortalities occurred from the con trol group which experienced no angling, but did experience tank confinement at release, which may have added to post release stress and subsequent mortality that occurred after 72 hours post release. These estimates may be conservative relative to tarpon in the wild since shark predation was excluded in the pond environment. In general, angling with minimal air exposure, such as might be required if taking a photograph on a fishing trip, did not appear detrimental to tarpon recovery and survival un der rou tine angling conditions. In fact, eight of the 37 sub adult tarpon from this study were recaptured and indicated that tarpon can recover from the stress of catch and release angling Three of the recaptured tarpon were from the control group, three were ex posed to air while being supported horizontally and two were tarpon exposed to air w hile being handled vertically. One vertically handled, air exposed fish was actually recaptured five times throughout the summer
99 Water temperature has been shown to play a role in the stress response of fish, being more extreme in temperatures greater than 2 0 degrees Celsius (Wydoski 1976 Gustaveson 1991 Kieffer et al. 1994 Wilkie et al. 1997 Meka and McCormick 2005 ), but most of these studies were on coldwater species and tarpon is a tropical species Average summer water temperatures (pond and Gulf) when angled tarpon were sampled ranged between 29 and 30C. However, fish from control groups experienced significantly cooler temperatures at their time of sampling. This was partly because the outdoor tanks were shaded, but for the adult control group there was also a seasonal effect since these fish were sacrificed in the fall. Satellite pop up archival tags (PAT) have recorded tarpon swimming in water temperatures rangi ng from 16 34C with preferred water temperatures of 2 8 30 C in the summer and 24 26C in the spring and fall (Luo et al. 2008) Water temperatures at the time of sampling fell within the preferred ra n ges for the species based on Luo et al. (2008) Despit e this seasonal difference and correlation with low water temperatures, the R DA show ed that collectively t emperature effects and effects of other environmental parameters were minimal, especially in comparison to angling effects (Figure 3.7 ). Several oth er factors not measured in this study may account for the unexpla ined variability in the data. The list includes many intrinsic factors beyond the control of an angler such as gender, age, previous exposure to the stressor or multiple captures, and conditi on (Arlinghaus et al. 2007). Preexisting conditions of disease or chronic stress (Sumpter et al. 1986), nutritional state (Barton et al. 2002), prey availability and predator ness variability (Cooke et al. 2002, ) can each affect fish physiology and were unknowns in
100 this study. Physical injuries obtained during angling such as hook injuries, bleeding or cardiac response were not qualified or monitored in this study and can also physiological state (Cooke et al. 2001, Meka and Margraf 2007). None of these factors (lethal and sub lethal) response (Wood et al. 1983, Cooke et al 2 002, Arlinghaus et al. 2007). Understanding the physiological effects of catch and release angling is useful information to s cientists and managers charged with maintaining the sustainability of the Atlantic tarpon fishery especially if results can help d etermine ways to minimize stress and maximize survival when there is extensive fishing pressure (Young et al. 2 006). The current work compare d p re to immediate post exercise values of these blood parameters but studies show that physiological disturbanc es can continue for hours post release. No measurements of physiological activity post exercise or throughout the time it takes Atlantic tarpon (large and small) to metabolically recover from angling events were obtained Recovery entails a clearance of la ctate from the tissues (muscle and blood), a resynthesis of muscle energy stores and a correction of osmotic and ionic imbalances in the fish (Wedemeyer et al. 1990). The energy requirement for recovery may reduce a ors at the time of release, and can have more long term effects on feeding or reproductive ac tivity (Wendelaar Bonga 1997). Adult tarpon are targeted with intense pressure during the peak of their reproductive cycle and future studies should evaluate the e ffects of catch and release fishing on reproduction. The potential for suppressed reproductive activity or diminished success is a tertiary stress effect that has potential population level implications. More work is also needed to
101 determine if there is an effect of multiple captures as a potential chronic stressor in tarpon. Finally, no lethal thresholds for tarpon relative to excess metabolites or acid base and ionic imbalances from anaerobic activity were established in this study. Quantifying the physio logical re sponse up to these thresholds is necessary in order to apply the results here and potentially have predictive indices for post release mortality and to set appropriate catch and release science based guidelines that benefit the resource and fishe ry. Literature Cited Arlinghaus,R. and Hallerman,J. 2007. Effects of air exposure on mortality and growth of undersized pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, at low water temperatures with implications for catch and release angling. Fish Manag Ecol 14 : 155 160 Arlinghaus,R., Cooke,S.J., Lyman,J., Policansky,D., Schwab,A., Suski,C.D., Sutton,S.G., and Thorstad,E.B. 2007. Understanding the complexity of catch and release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethic al, social, a nd biological perspectives. Rev.Fish. Sci 15 : 75 167. Arlinghaus,R., Klefoth,T., Cooke,S.J., Gingerich,A.J., and Suski,C.D. 2009. Physiological and behavioural consequences of catch and release angling on northern pike ( Esox lucius L.). Fish. Res. 97 : 223 233. Babcock,L.L. 1936. Description and Habits. In: The Tarpon. pp. 11 77. Barton,B.A., Morgan,J.D., and Vijayan,M.M. 2002. Physiological and condition related indicators of environmental stress in fish. In: Adams, S.M. (ed.). Biological Indi cators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 111 148. Bennett,A.F., Seymour,R.S., Bradford,D.F., and Webb,G.J.W. 1985. Mass dependence of anaerobic metabolism and acid base disturbance during activity in the salt water crocodile, Crocodylus porosus J. Exp. Biol. 118 : 161 171. Black,E.C. 1958. Hyperactivity as a lethal factor in fish. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 15 : 573 586. Booth,R.K., Kieffer,J.D., Davidson,K., Bielak,A.T., and Tufts,B.L. 1994. Effects of late season cat ch and release angling on anaerobic metabolism, acid base status, survival, and gamete viability in wild Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52 : 283 290.
102 Brill,R., Bushnell,P., Schroff,S., Seifert,R., and Galvin,M. 2008. Effects of ana erobic exercise accompanying catch and release fishing on blood oxygen affinity of the sandbar shark ( Carcharhinus plumbeus Nardo). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 354 : 132 143. Brobbel,M.A., Wilkie,M.P., Davidson,K., Kieffer,J.D., Bielak,A.T., and Tufts,B.L. 1996. Physiological effects of catch and release angling in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) at different stages of freshwater migration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53 : 2036 2043. Childress,J.J. and Somero,G.N. 1990. Metabolic scaling: a new perspective based on scaling of glycolytic enzyme activities. Am. Zool. 30 : 161 173. Cliff,G. and Thurman,G.D. 1984. Pathological and physiological effects of stress during capture and transport in the juvenile dusky shark, Carcharhinus Obscurus Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Pa rt A 78 : 167 173. Cooke,S.J., Phillip,D.P., Dunmall,K.M., and Schreer,J.F. 2001. The Influence of Terminal Tackle on Injury, Handling Time, and Cardiac Disturbance of Rock Bass. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 21 : 333 342. Cooke,S.J., Schreer,J.F., Dunmall,K.M., an d Phillip,D. P. 2002. Strategies for Quantifying Sublethal Effects of Marine Catch and Release Angling: Insights from Novel Freshwater Applications. In: J.A.Lucy and A.L.Studholme (eds.). Catch and Release in Marine Recreational Fisheries. Bethesda, Marylan d, USA: American Fisheries Society 30, pp. 121 134. Cooke,S.J. and Suski,C.D. 2005. Do we need species specific guidelines for catch and release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources? Biodiv. Conserv. 14 : 1195 1209. Cooke,S .J. and Schramm,H.L. 2007. Catch and release science and its application to conservation and managament of recreational fisheries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 73 79. Cooke,S.J., Suski,C.D., Danylchuk,S.E., Danylchuk,A.J., Donaldson,M.R., Pullen,C.E., Bulte,G., O' Toole,A., Murchie,K.J., Koppelman,J.B., Shultz,A.D., Brooks,E., and Goldberg,T.L. 2008. Effects of different capture techniques on the physiological condition of bonefish Albula vulpes evaluated using field diagnostic tools. J. Fish Biol. 73 : 1351 1375. Danylchuk,A.J., Danylchuk,S.E., Cooke,S.J., Goldberg,T.L., Koppelman,J.B., and Philipp,D.P. 2007. Post release mortality of bonefish, Albula vulpes exposed to different handling practices during catch and release angling in Eleuthera, The Bahamas. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 149 154.
103 Davis,M.W. and Parker,S.J. 2004. Fish Size and Exposure to Air: Potential Effects on Behavioral Impairment and Mortality Rates in Discarded Sablefish. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 24 : 518 524. Davis,M.W. and Schreck,C.B. 2005. Responses by Pacific Halibut to Air Exposure: Lack of Correspondence among Plasma Constituents and Mortality. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134 : 991 998. Dobson,G.P. and Hochachaka,P.W. 1987. Role of glycolysis in adenylate depletion and repletion during work and recovery in teleost white muscle. J. Exp.Biol. 129 : 125 140. DuBois,R.B. and Dubeilzig,R.R. 2004. Effect of hook type on mortality, trauma, and capture efficiency of wild stream trout caught by angling with spinners. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 24 : 609 616. Eros,S.K. an d Milligan,C.L. 1996. The effect of cortisol on recovery from exhaustive exercise in rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ): Potential mechanisms of action. Physiol. Zool. 69 : 1196 1214. Ferguson,R.A. and Tufts,B.L. 1992. Physiological effects of brief air ex posure in exhaustively exercised rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) : implications for "catch and release" fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49 : 1157 1162. Ferguson,R.A., Kieffer,J.D., and Tufts,B.L. 1993. The effects of body size on the acid base and m etabolite status in the white muscle of rainbow trout before and after exhaustive exercise. J. Exp. Biol. 180 : 195 207. Frick,L.H., Reina,R.D., and Walker,T.I. 2010. Stress related physiological changes and post release survival of Port Jackson sharks ( He terodontus portusjacksoni ) and gummy sharks ( Mustelus antarcticus ) following gill net and longline capture in captivity. J. Exp. Biol. Ecol. 385 : 29 37. Gamperl, A.K., Vijayan, M.M. and R.G. Boutiler. 1994. Experimental control of stress hormone levels in fishes : techniques and applications. Rev. Fish Biol Fish. 4:215 255. Gingerich,A.J., Cooke,S.J., Hanson,K., Donaldson,M.R., Hasler,C.T., Suski,C.D., and Arlinghaus,R. 2007. Evaluation of the interactive effects of air exposure duration and water temperatu re on the condition and survival of angled and released fish. Fish. Res. : 169 178. Graham, J.B. 1997. Air breathing fishes: evolution, diversity, and adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego. 299pp Gustaveson,A.W., Wydoski,R.S., and Wedemeyer,G.A. 1991. Physiological response of largemouth bass to angling stress. Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 120 : 629 636.
104 Hochachka,P.W. 1991. Design of energy metabolism. Environmental and Metabolic Animal Physiology 325 351. Houston ,A.R. 1990 Blood and Circulation. In: Schreck,C.B.,Moyle,P.B., (eds.). Methods for Fish Biology. Bethesda,Maryland, USA: Ame rican Fisheries Society, 273 334. Kieffer,J.D., Currie,S. andTufts, B.L. 1994. Effects of environmental temperature on the metabolic and acid base responses of rainbow trout to exhaustive exercise. J. Exp. Biol. 194: 299 317. Kieffer,J.D. 2000. Limits to exhaustive exercise in fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 126 : 161 179. Luo,J., Ault,J.S., Larkin,M.F., Humston,R., and Olson,D.B. 2008. Seasonal migratory p atterns and v ertical h abitat u tilization of Atlantic t arpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) from Satellite PAT Tags. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisheries. CRC Press, 275 299. Marshall,W.S. 2002. Na+,CL ,Ca2+ and Zn2+ Transport by fish gills: Retrospective review and prospective synthesis. J.Exp. Zool. 293 : 264 2 83. Mazeaud,M.M., Mazeaud,F., and Donaldson,E.M. 1977. Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106 : 201 212. McDonald,D.G., McFarlane,W.J., and Milligan,C.L. 1998. Anaerobic capacity and s wim performance of juvenile salmonids. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55 : 1198 1207. Meka,J.M. and McCormick,S.D. 2005. Physiological response of wild rainbow trout to angling: impact of angling duration, fish size, body condition, and temperature. Fish Res. 72 : 311 322. Meka,J.M. and Margraf,F.J. 2007. Using a bioenergetics model to assess growth reduction from catch and release fishing and hooking injury in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 131 139. Milligan,C.L., Hooke,G.B., and Johns on,C. 2000. Sustained swimming at low velocity following a bout of exhaustive exercise enhances metabolic recovery in rainbow trout. The J. Exp. Biol. 203 : 921 926. Mommsen,T.P., Vijayan,M.M., and Moon,T.W. 1999. Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev.Fish. Biol. Fish. 9 : 211 268. Ricklefs,R.E. and Wikelski,M. 2002. The physiology/life history nexus. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 17 : 462 468.
105 Seymour,R.S., Bennett,M.B., and Christian, K. 2003. Gills and air breathing orga ns of the tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides: gas exchange morphometry and physiological responses to aquatic hypoxia and exercise. Com. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 134, S116. Skomal,G. B.2006. The physiological effects of capture stress on post release survivorshi p of sharks, tunas and marlin. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston, MD, USA: Boston University, 304pp. Skomal,G.B. 2007. Evaluating the physiological and physical consequences of capture on post release survivorship in large pelagic fishes. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 8 1 89. Somero,G.N. and Childress,J.J. 1990. Scaling of ATP supplying enzymes, myofibrillar proteins and buffering capacity in fish muscle: relationship to locomotory habit. J.Exp.Biol. 149 : 319 333. Sumpter,J.P., Dye,H.M., and Benfey,T.J. 1986. The effects of stress on plasma ACTH, MSH, and cortisol levels in salmonid fishes. Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 62: 377 385. Suski,C.D., Killen,S.S., Cooke,S.J., Kieffer,J.D., Phillip,D.P., and Tufts,B.L. 2004. Physiological significance of the weigh in during live release a ngling tournaments for largemouth bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133 : 1291 1303. Suski,C.D., Killen,S.S., Kieffer, J .D., and Tufts,B. L. 2006. The influence of environmental temperature and oxygen concentration on the recovery of largemouth bass from exercise: implications for live release angling tournaments. J. Fish Biol. 68, 120 136. Suski,C.D., Cooke,S.J., Danylchuk,A.J., O'Connor,C.M., Gravel,M., Redpath,T., Hanson,K.C., Gingerich,A.J., Murchie,K.J., Danylchuk,S.E., Koppelman,J.B., and Goldberg,T.L. 2007. Physiological disturbance and recovery dynamics of bonefish (Albula vulpes), a tropical marine fish, in response to variable exercise and exposure to air. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 148 : 664 673. Tang,Y. and Boutilier,R.G. 1991. White muscle intracellu lar acid base and lactate status following exhaustive exercise: a comparison between freshwater and seawater adapted rainbow trout. J. Exp. Biol. 156 :153 171. Thorstad,E.B., Naesje,T.F., Fiske,P., and Finstad,B. 2003. Effects of hook and release on Atlant ic salmon in the river alta, northern Norway. Fish. Res. 60 : 293 307. Vijayan, M.M. and Leatherla nd, J.F. 1990. High stocking density affects cortisol secretion and tissue distribution in brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis J. Endocrinol. 124: 311 318.
106 Wan g,Y., Wilkie,M.P., Heigenhauser,J.F., and Wood,C.M. 1994. The analysis of metabolites in rainbow trout white muscle: a comparison of different sampling and processing methods. J. Fish Biol. 45 : 855 873. Wedemeyer, G.A., Barton, B.A. and McLeay ,D.L 1990. S tress and acclimation. In: C. B. Schreck and P. B. Moyle (eds). Methods for F ish B iology. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society, pp. 451 489 Wells,R.M.G., McIntyre,R.H., Morgan,A.K., and Davie,P.S. 1986. Physiological stress responses in big gamefish after capture: observations on plasma chemistry and blood factors. Comp. Biochem.Physiol. 84A : 565 571. Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., and Weber,R.E. 1997. Blood oxygen transport and hemoglobin function in three tropical fish species fro m northern Autralia freshwater billabongs. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 16 : 247 258. Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., Baudinette,R.V., Christian,K., and Bennett,M.B. 2003. Oxygen transport capacity in the air breathing fish, Megalops cyprinides : compensat ions for strenuous exercise. Comp. Biochem. and Physiol. Part A 134 : 45 53. Wells, R.M.G. a nd Baldwin ,J 2006. Plasma lactate and glucose flushes following burst swimming in silver trevally ( Pseudocaranx dentex : Carangidae) support the is. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 143 : 347 352. Wells,R.M.G., Baldwin,J., Seymour,R.S., Christian,K.A., and Farrell,A.P. 2007. Air breathing minimizes post exercise lactate load in the tropical Pacific tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides Broussonet 1782 but ox ygen debt is repaid by aquatic breathing. J. Fish Biol. 71 : 1649 1661. Wendelaar Bonga,S.E. 1997. The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 77 : 591 625. Wikelski,M. and Cooke,S.J. 2006. Conservation physiology. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 21 : 38 46. Wilkie,M.P. Davidson,K., Brobbel,M.A., Kieffer,J.D., Booth,R.K., Bielak,A.T., and Tufts,B.L. 1996. Physiology and survival of wild Atlantic salmon following angling in warm summer waters. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 125 : 572 580. Wilkie,M.P., Brobbel,M.A., Davidson,K., Fo rsyth,L., and Tufts,B.L. 1997. Influences of temperature upon the postexercvise physiology of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54 : 503 511. Wood,C.M., Turner, J.D. and Graham ,M.S. 1983. Why do fish die after severe exercise? J. Fish Biol. 22 : 189 201.
107 Wood,C.M. 1991. Acid base and ion balance, metabolism, and their interactions after exhaustive exercise in fish. J Exp.Biol. 160 : 285 308. Wydoski,R.S., Wedemeyer, J.A. and.Nelson,N.S. 1976. Physiological response to hooking stress in ha tchery and wild rainbow trout ( Salmo gairdneri ). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 105 : 601 606. Young,J.L, Bornick, Z.B., Marcotte, M.L., Charlie, K.N., Wagner, G.N., Hinch, S.G. and Cook S.J. 2006. Integrating physiology and life history to improve fisheries manageme nt and conservation. Fish Fish. 7 : 262 283.
108 Table 3. 1 : A summary of tarpon sizes and field variables related to angling events for each treatment group. Total number ( N ) and means of total lengths (TL) in millimeters, weights (Wt) in kilograms (kg), angli ng duration (in minutes), handling times (which includes bleed time) in seconds (secs), air temperatures and water temperatures in degrees Celsius ( C), salinity in parts per thousand (ppt), dissolved oxygen (DO) of the water in parts per million (ppm) and pH for each treatment group and size class of tarpon. Groups of adult tarpon were either angled or control fish. Sub adult tarpon were subjected to one of three handling treatments: angling followed by 60 seconds of horizontal air exposure (Air H), anglin g followed by 60 seconds of vertical dangling air exposure (Air V), and angling followed by no air exposure (NoAir). The other treatment was the rapidly sampled (RS) control group. Standard errors are presented in p arentheses. Average size and environment al parameters were compared for each size class. An asteri sk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference of means between angled and control groups of adult tarpon compared with a Sub adult handling treatments were tested with a one way ANOVA ( = 0.05). Dissimilar superscripted letters after a given concentration indicate statistically significant differences among handling treatments of sub adult tarpon as determi n ed post hoc with a Tukey Test. No letters next to the values would indicate no statistical differences among the fou r sub adult handling treatments. Size Class Treatment N TL (mm) Wt (kg) Angling (min) Handling (secs) Adult Angled 45 1872 22.58* 50.95 2.02 22.36 2.37 472.29 45.15 Control 6 1732 58.12 35 .73 3.15 0 411.00 62.98 Sub adult Air H 9 563 18.89 a 1.26 0.10 a 2.11 0.26 277.33 52.70 Air V 9 581 28.05 a 1.56 0.25 a 1.72 0.30 425.44 47.59 No Air 10 567 16.78 a 1.33 0.12 a 3.40 0.49 295.10 74.81 RS Control 9 703 20.70 b 2.42 0.22 b 0.11 0.07 258.56 44.1 2
109 Table 3.1 : Continued. Size Class Treatment N Air Temp (C) Water Temp (C) Salinity (ppt) DO (ppm) pH Adult Angled 45 30.5 0.38* 29.11 0.11* 38.08 0.06* 6.11 0.07 8.29 0.02* Control 6 26.7 0.80 24.34 0.74 35.88 0.18 6.62 0.29 7.97 0.05 Sub adult Air H 9 30.6 0.58 28.92 0.63 a 28.16 1.22 a 5.97 0.96 8.29 0.09 a Air V 9 31.3 0.91 29.24 0.60 a 26.72 1.4 a 6.40 0.57 8.30 0.08 a No Air 10 31.5 1.04 30. 18 0.36 a 29.53 0.79 a 6.33 1.00 8.37 0.05 a RS Control 9 29.4 0.94 27.27 0.14 b 36.45 0.08 b 6.26 0.05 7.98 0.02 b
110 Table 3 .2 : A quantitative summary of eleven hematological parameters measured in adult and sub adult Atlantic tar pon at rest and after angling. Blood composition from angled sub adult tarpon were summarized by different three handling treatments, angling followed by 60 seconds of horizontal air exposure (Air H orizontal ), angling followed by 60 seconds of vertical dangling air exposure (Air V ertical ), and anglin g follow ed by no air exposure. The following response variables were measured from each tarpon: hematocrit (HCT, %), hemoglobin (Hb, (g/dL)), metabolites lactate (mmol/L) and glucose ( mg/dL), the hormone cortisol (g/dL) and select electrolytes calcium (mg/dL), sodium (mEq/L), potassium (mEq/L), chloride (mEq/L), phosphorus (mg/dL), magnesium ( mEq/L) Non stressed groups of adult and sub adult tarpon are labeled as c ontrol and rapidly sampled control ( RS C) respectively The mean concentration one standard err or and sample size (n) are presented for each handling treatment and parameter. An asteri sk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference of means between angled and control groups of adult tarpon compared with a Stu Mean concentrations among sub adult handling treatments were tested with a one way ANOVA ( = 0.05). Dissimilar superscripted letters after a given concentration indicate statistically significant differences among handling treatm ents of sub adult tarpon as determi n ed post hoc with a Tukey Test. No letters next to the values would indicate no statistically significant differences among the four sub adult handling treatments.
111 Table 3.2 : C ontinued. Hematology Metabolites Hormon e Treatment HCT Hb Lactate Glucose Cortisol Adult Angled 46.9 0.85* (41) 19.4 0.36 (29) 10.5 0.75 (35) 114.3 4.02 (38) 0.8 0.09 (43) Control 31.8 2.99 (6) 11.2 1.73 (4) 0.3 0.20 (6) 64.7 5.43 (6) 0.5 0.16 (6) Sub Adult Air H orizontal 45.6 1.15 (9) a 15.9 1.40 (6) 3.5 0.17 (8) a 61.3 2.94 (9) 4.4 1.34 (9) Air Vertical 45.7 1.83 (9) a 17.3 0.81 (8) 3.7 0.33 (7) a 67.8 5.88 (9) 4.1 1.09 (9) No Air 45.1 1.22 (10) a 17.5 1.07 (7) 4.4 0.64 (10) a 60.4 4.44 (10) 5.7 1. 27 (10) Control (RS C) 38.8 1.48 (9) b 15.8 0.87 (7) 1.1 0.20 (8) b 64.2 3.73 (9) 3.5 .087 (9)
112 Table 3 .2 : Continued. Electrolytes Treatment Calcium Sodium Potassium Chloride Phosphorus Magnesium Adult Angled 15.9 0.39(36)* 192. 8 1.99(27)* 5.4 0.13(38)* 167.4 2.53(37)* 10.0 0.36(38)* 5.0 0.29(38)* Control 11.4 0.41(6) 162.0 1.95(6) 3.7 0.14(6) 149.0 2.22(6) 5.8 0.16(6) 3.0 0.32(6) Sub Adult Air Horizontal 11.7 0.36(9) 162.7 3.09(9) 5.0 0.16(9) 139.2 4.38(9) 7.7 0.41(9) 3.0 0.11(9) a Air Vertical 11.7 0.31(8) 164.3 2.76(9) 5.2 0.21(8) 142.4 3.72(9) 7.3 0.45(9) 3.5 0.46(9) a,b No Air 12.3 0.34(10) 163.8 3.97(10) 5.2 0.20(10) 140.0 5.67(10) 7.2 0.63(10) 4.0 0.48(10) b Control (RS C) 11.9 0.23(9) 167.8 1.85(9) 5.1 0.17(9) 143.6 2.50(9) 6.6 0.20(9) 2.6 0.08(9) a,c
113 Table 3.3 : A size class comparison of the mean responses of eleven blood parameters to angling The three sub adult angling treatments were comb ined to represent angled, small tarpon since there were no significant differences detected among treatments. The following response variables were measured f rom each tarpon: hematocrit (HCT, %), hemoglobin ( Hb, ( g/dL)), metabolites lactate ( mmol/L) and gl ucose ( mg/dL) the hormone cortisol ( g/dL) and select electrolytes calcium ( mg/dL), sodium (mEq/L), potassium ( mEq/L), chloride ( mEq/L), phosphorus (mg/dL), and magnesium ( mEq/L) Ranked scores were used to compare the hematology concentrations using non paramet ric Wilcoxon two sample tests The two non significant tests are in bold. Only angled fish were used in these comparisons. Adult Sub Adult Wilcoxon Response Variable Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Pr > |Z| HCT 46.9 0.85 45.4 0.79 0.0863 Hb 19.4 0.36 17.0 0.61 0.0008 Lactate 10. 5 0.75 3.5 0.28 <0.0001 Glucose 114.3 4.02 3.9 2.6 <0.0001 Cortisol 0.8 0.09 63.1 0.87 <0.0001 Calcium 15.9 0.39 11.9 0.2 <0.0001 Sodium 192.8 1.99 163.6 1.88 <0.0001 Potassium 5.4 0.13 5.2 0.11 0.3334 Chloride 167.4 2.53 140.5 2.65 <0.0001 Phosphor us 10.0 0.36 7.4 0.29 <0.0001 Magnesium 5.0 0.29 3.5 0.23 <0.0001
114 Table 3.4 : Comparisons of blood chemistries, body size, angling duration and various handling times (PBH, TBT, BoatH, THT) from adult tarpon bled using caudal venipuncture (CV) and gill m ethods. Bleeding large tarpon from branchial vessels in the gill arch is a significantly quicker method for obtaining samples to measure immediate effec ts of angling (post exercise). Arithmetic means on raw data are presented for cortisol and magnesium but statistical tests were performed natural log (log e ) transformed data to meet assumptions of normality. face. Variable abbreviations and descriptions are detailed in Appendix C.
115 CV Gill Student T t est Wilcoxon N Mean SE N Mean SE T df P Statistic Pr>|Z| HCT (%) 14 44.25 1.16 27 48.26 1.06 2.37 39 0.0230 297.5 0.0003 Hb (g/LdL) 7 18 0.53 22 19.8 0.4 2.32 27 0.0283 89.5 0.0008 Lactate (mmol/L) 10 12.54 1.54 25 9.72 0.82 1.75 33 0.0890 Glucose (mg/dL) 12 110.2 6.13 26 116.2 5.19 0.7 36 0.4909 Calcium (mg/dL) 10 15.77 0.93 2 6 16 0.41 0.26 34 0.7943 Sodium (mEq/L) 12 197.6 5 25 190.5 1.62 1.34 35 0.2015 Potassium (mEq/L) 13 5.99 0.25 25 5.09 0.12 3.73 36 0.0007 Chloride (mEq/L) 12 170.3 7.3 25 166 1.5 0.59 35 0.5682 Phosphorus (mg/dL) 12 11.33 0.54 26 9.32 0.42 2.81 36 0.0008 Magnesium (mEq/L)* 12 5.89 0.78 26 4.58 0.2 1.73 36 0.1054* Cortisol (g/dL)* 16 0.71 0.1 27 0.78 0.13 0.47 41 0.6389* TL (mm) 18 1881.7 32.9 27 1864.9 31 0.36 43 0.7197 W eight (kg) 18 50.46 3.01 27 51.28 2.7 0.2 43 0.8450 Angling Duration (min) 18 28.8 4.7 27 18.04 2.06 2.09 43 0 0236 PBH (min) 18 4.51 0.6 27 4.15 0.63 0.39 43 0.7012 TBT (sec) 18 363.6 51.3 27 144.4 40.13 3.39 43 0.0015 TBTgn (sec) 18 295.8 49.95 27 72.77 20.58 4 .13 42 0.0004 TBTgy (sec) 18 403.8 59.56 27 173.2 46.04 2.88 34 0.0068 BoatH (secs) 18 586.5 68.15 27 396.1 56.3 2.15 43 0.0373 BoatHgn (sec) 18 555.2 55.03 27 359.2 56.7 2.37 43 0.0225 BoatHgy (sec) 11 706.9 76.4 25 431.7 58.4 2.7 34 0 .0106 THT (min) 18 39.24 5.15 27 25 2.17 2.55 43 0.0179
116 Figure 3. 1 : Holding tanks for sub adult (rear) and adult tarpon (front) control groups. A B Figure 3. 2 : Depictions of two handling treatments for sub adult tarpon. (A) angling f ollowed by 60 seconds of air exposure while being held horizontally out of the water (Air H), and ( B) angling followed by 60 seconds of air exposure while being held vertically out of the water (Air V) Images used with permission from the FWC FWRI.
117 A B Figure 3.3 : Drawing blood using caudal venipuncture methods in a sub adult tarpon (A) and drawing blood from the branchial vessel in a gill arch from an adult tarpon (B). Images used with permission from the FWC FWRI (A) and BobTheriault (B).
1 19 Figur e 3.4: Results of a multivariate non parametric redundancy analysis examining the variance of tarpon blood responses for all handling treatments. Each labeled point (blue) represents one tarpon (n=64). The spatial distance between points represen Angled or Percussion (control animals). Sub adult handling treatments were labeled as Air H ( angl ed followed by 60 seconds of air exposure while being held horizontally out of the water) Air V ( angl ed followed by 60 seconds of a ir exposure while being held vertically out of the water) No Air ( angl ed followed by no air exposure ), or RS C for the rapidly sampled control group. Hematological (respon se variables, green), and predictor variables pertaining to the angling events (in red) were used in the model. For predictors (red), the vector lengths indicate the relative strength of the relationship with the response data. The longer vectors are more influe Predictor variables include Air Temp (C), Water Temp (C), dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity (SAL), pH, total length (TL), weight, angling duration (Fightr), bleed method, and handling times (BoatH_secs) Handling times used in the model combined the amount of time the fish was handled at the side of the boat or by the bank of the pond before it was bled plus the amount of time it took to bleed the tarpon. For response vectors (green), the magnitude is proportional to the contribution that blood parameter makes to the patterns depicted in the multivariate space by the biplot. Result are given for the primary and secondary axes which accounted for 60.55% of the total variance in the observed data (adjusted r squared = 0.633, p = 0.001).
120 Figure 3.5 : Larger tarpon take significantly longer to land in the recreational fishery. Depicted is the weight (in kilograms) by angling duration (in minutes) regression for combined size classes of angled tarpon : Y = 2.4847 + 0.38305 (Weight); p<0.001.
121 Figure 3.6 : Linear regression of angling duration (in minutes) on plasma lactate concentration s in adult tarpon The multiple regression equation for the lactate model is Y = 3.749575 + 0.10622 (Fight) + 0 .00966 (Handling) (R 2 = 0.567, p<0.0001 )
122 Figure 3.7 : A visualization of the interaction effect between angling duration (in minutes) and handling time (in seconds) on lactate in sub adult tarpon. Handling time is the combined time of pre bleed handling plus total b leed time. The reduced m ultiple regression equation for the lactate model is Y = 2.7687 + 0.0015(Fight*Handling ) ( R 2 = 0.134, p<0.0001).
123 CHAPTER FOUR : MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH mi ndset of anglers have restricted the harvest of tarpon to such a low level that the largest source of fishing mortality is from the practice of catch and release angling. Using the number of issued permits (Guindon unpublished data) as a p roxy for annual harvest against statewide total catch estimates ( Personal communication from the National Marine Fisheries Service, Fisheries Statistics Division 2010 ), showed that less than 1% of the total catch is harvested. Traditional fisheries manag ement does not play a role with Atlantic tarpon in Florida as catch limits and size limits do not apply with the permit system. Catch at age matrices used to estimate fishing morality (F) or catch curve analyses used to estimate instantaneous total mortal ity (Z, Hilborn and Walters 1992) are not useful for tarpon because few fish are harvested and ages are not readily available. F ishing effort and subsequent post release mortality, sometimes referred to as cryptic mortality or death associated with physic al injury, handling stress or post release predation (Coggins et al. 2007), is more influen tial on the total population size than harvest. Therefore, as fishing pressure (effort) increases and more tarpon are caught and released understanding the lethal and sub lethal effects of catch and release angling on tarpon stocks becomes necessary to maintain the sustainability of the fis hery. Most
124 importantly, reliable estimates of population size and accurate measure s of fishing effort are needed. This study ev aluated short term catch and release mortality and sub lethal physiolog i cal disturbances separately from each other. However, studies combining p hysiological stress indicators with survival using telemetry can be a powerful tool to create appropriate scien ce based management decisions could have tertiary implications for the fishery (Davis et al. 2001 in Barton et al. 2002, Young et al. 2006, Wikelski and Cooke 2006, Skomal 2007). If population size and fishing effort remain unknown for tarpon periodic mon itoring of catch and release mortality should occur so that managers can watch for signs of increasing trends in mortality rates within the recreational fishery. A n alternative management approach to reduce post release mortality would be to simply limit fishing effort (angling) Limited entry is a wi dely used practice in wildlife management areas ( Dimmick and Klimstra 1964 ). A review by Bartholomew and Bohnsack (2005) has gone so far as to suggest that the practice of catch and release angling in some in stances may be so influential on post release morality that the conservation concept of no ta ke Marine Protected Areas (MPA) may be a better option thereby elimin ating post release mortality. This was countered by Cooke et al. (2006) who suggest ed that eac h of the eight factors synthesized by Bartholomew and Bohnsack (2005) be reviewed as species specific cases because catch and release may be compatible with the concept of a no take MPAs (Table 1 in Cooke et al. 2006). One of these eight factors was predat ion. This study showed that post release predation influenced tarpon survival. T arpon experienced lethal shark attacks in both systems, but more were observed in Boca Grande
125 Pass. Boca Grande Pass has legally defined boundaries for management purposes. The boundar ies coupled with the fact that caught tarpon are released back into the pass, creates an area that could be considered a de facto MPA, which allows catch and release tarpon fishing to occur. A topic for investigation now is to determine whether or not fishing in the de facto MPA of BGP influences predator abundance. Cooke et al. (2006) stated that research on lobsters in MPAs and modeling exercises on MPAs showed that MPAs may unintentionally create areas with increased predator densities. Calculat ed catch and release mortality rates attributed to shark attacks in this study were higher (13%) in BPG, than in Tampa Bay (5%). However, part of the observed inter and intra seasonal variability in shark abundance and incidence of attacks in BGP may be r elated to the life history of the shark species. The predator prey interaction of the two (tarpon and sharks) and their a bundances should be evaluated. In the mean time, when predator burdens are high, angler ethics and behavior will play a role in determi ning the fate of tarpon (Cooke et al. 2006). e caught along the Gulf Coast. Statewide e stimates of the total number of tarpon caught based on random angler intercepts s Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) are variable and somewhat unreliable because of the extremely low number of intercepts with tarpon anglers. However, they are best data currently available to monitor the recreational catches of ta rpon. T he MRFSS data from 2003 through 2009, the years encompassing this research, estimated that t arpon total catches ranged from 44,019 15.7 percent standard error (PSE) to 62,896 14.2 PSE 8,629 39.8 PSE t o 3 8,929 21.6 PSE tarpon
126 4 .1 ). Statewide estimates of the total catch between 2003 and 2009 ranged from a low of 54,894 14.4 PSE fish in 2009 to a maximum of 89,558 13.5 PSE in 2005 Catch data estimates on the Atlanti c coast had higher (>20%) PSE s or lower precision, than Gulf Coast estimates and were not as statistically reliable. Application of the mortality rates from this study could be applied to the MRFSS catch estimates for other states within the species rang e or along the Gulf Coast, or even statewide for Florida since tarpon is a migratory species. However, recent genetic evidence by Ward et al. (2008) revealed tight groupings of most locations sampled for Atlantic tarpon, but found samples from the Florida population to be genetically divergent from the other locations sampled. This potential isolation, coupled with the fact that samp l ing for this study took place along the central and southwest Florida Gulf coast, only MRFSS data on released tarpon along th e Gulf Coast were used to estimate population mortality Using sonic telemetry, it was estimated that 8 7% of released tarpon survive. Assuming a 13% mortality rate (including predation) for released tarpon and using the mean MRFSS estimate of the total rel eased tarpon along the Gulf coast during 2003 2009 (50,955 15.8 PSE, Table 4 .1), an average of 6,828 1,079 tarpon died each year from catch and release angling. Annual estimates of release mortality among these years ranged from a low of 5,899 926 fis h in 2009 to a maximum of 8,105 1,167 in 2004 (Figure 4 .1). Angler education, not necessarily regulation, could help to increase the numbers of tarpon surviving catch and release angling. Causes other than predation were responsible for 5% of the obs erv ed mortality in this study. Poor handling practices causing irreparable physical and physiologic al damage can be somewhat controlled
127 through education and awareness campaigns while other significant factors on survival, such as foul hooking and predation, are more difficult to control whether by education or regulation. Communicating these results to the public through education and outreach materials that provide guidelines on suggested best handling practices for tarpon, may reduce this 5% mortality rate. A 5% decrease in mortality would result in an annual increase of approximately 2,701 427 tarpon surviving catch and release events ( Figure 4 .1). Small changes increasing survival can have a large effect on long lived species (Schroeder and Love 2002). Sub and tourism. An economic study has attempted to quantify the monetary value of the tarpon fishery for the southwest region of Florida to stress its importance to businessmen, p ublic and private sectors, governments and anglers alike (Tony Fedler, personal communication). Tarpon conservation efforts in F lorida should focus on these sub adult and adult life history stages where threats are predominantly related to predation and t he effects of catch and release angling. The effects of international tarpon fishing on the numbers of tarpon reaching Florida waters are unknown. While harvest rates that could decrease a tarpon population are low in Florida, landings in other countries which support subsistence fisheries should be evaluated. Tarpon fisheries in other Central and South American countries may record commercial fishery to dec line since tarpon are a migratory species (Ault et al. 2008) Knowing where that satellite tagging programs evaluating long term movements and migrations (Luo et
128 al. 2008) coupled with genetic tagging studies being conducted by the Florida Fish and et al. 2008) hope to address. While state governments can not regulate other countries they can communicate relevant st ate findings to other countries via publications and information, to help conserve these f ish. Biologists are increasingly being asked to provide the best possible science to resource managers, environmental conservation groups, and legislators so everyo ne can understand potential impacts of recreational fishing practices to make good decisions for the reso urce (Wikelski and Cooke 2006). In turn, the anglers look to government natural resource agencies for guidelines on how to handle fish However, when r egulations are needed the regulation should be communicated in such a way that everyone (scientist, manager, government, enforcement and public) understands why it is needed and the rule should be fair and enforceable (Miller 1990). In a re view by Pelleti er et al. (2007), the state of Florida was poorly ranked as having inadequate easy to access outreach materials available to the public regarding best practices for catch and release angling. A number ology and post release mortality in response to angling were addressed in this work. Future efforts will be made to provide products and coordinated outreach activities to anglers, guides, and conservation groups that include suggestions and guidance for m inimizing tarpon stress responses and maximizing post release recovery and survival Biologists should start to integrate biology and fish physiology with management and conservation applications into their programs. Defining hypotheses to be tested that link to potential tertiary effects for tarpon will be the most beneficial ( Cooke and
129 Schramm 2007). Continuing this research should include measuring blood responses throughout the recovery period following exhaustive exercise or angling by sampling tarpo n up to 24 hours post release and establishing lethal thresholds for select physiological parameters (i.e. lactate) in response to angling. The cortisol response could be investigated to understand the underlying mechanism of suppressed levels observed in angled fish. In addition, to fully understand the scope of metabolic and respiratory acidosis caused by angling in tarpon, muscle enzymes, muscle energy reserves and blood gases to produce oxygen equilibrium curves should be measured. Doing so will generat e data that could be used to provide predictive capability in potential mortality and allow for better science based management decisions rather than just reducing fishing effort Future work within the fishery should include investigating the cumulative effect of multiple captures on tarpon and estimating dela yed mortality in adult tarpon. Tournament procedures that require extensive handling of tarpon should be evaluated relative to t arpon physiology and survival. Other unknowns that could be disruptive to tarpon are related to the effects of ambient sound (i.e. boat engine noise) on tarpon movement, behavior and stress physiology that have been shown to influence other species (Sand et al. 2000, Popper 2003, McCauley et al. 2003). Finally, peak season fo r tarpon angling in the major geographical areas along the Gulf central and southwest coasts and Florida Keys is typically late spring and summer ( May to July ), which coincides with peak spawning season (Crabtree et al. 1997 ) and targets the largest tarpon in spawning aggregations. Information linking the sub lethal and potential tertiary effects of angling on reproductive success (spawning, frequency, productivity, gamete size and
130 quality) is a needed area of research. Much of the reproductive biology of t he species is still unknown. B ased on field observations and the results from this study, it appears that sub adult and adult Atlantic tarpon along the Gulf coast of Florida are resilient and can recover from physiological disturbances incurred during ro utine catch and release angling events in the recreational fishery when they are released in the absence of large predators The anglers themselves can play a key role in tarpon conservation. Literature Cited Ault,J.S., Humston,R., Larkin,M.F., Perusquia ,E., Farmer,N.A., Luo,J., Zurcher,N., Smith,S.G., Barbieri,L.R., and Posada,J.M. 2008. Population dynamics and resource ecology of Atlantic tarpon and bonefish. In: J.S.Ault, (ed.). Biology and management of the world tarpon and bonefish fisheries. CRC Press Boca Raton. pp. 216 258. Bartholomew,A. a nd Bohnsack ,J.A 2005. A review of catch and release angling mortality with implications for no take reserves. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 15 : 129 154. Barton,B.A., Morgan,J.D., and Vijayan,M.M. 2002. Physiological an d condition related indicators of environmental stress in fish. In: Adams, S.M. (ed.). Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 111 148. Coggins,L.G., Catalano, M.J. Allen, M.S., Pine, W.E., and Walters ,C.J. 2007. Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management. Fish Fish. 8 : 196 210. Cooke,S.J., Danylchuk,A.J., Danylchuk,S.E., Suski,C.D., and Goldberg,T.L. 2006. Is catch and release recreational angling com patible with no take marine protected areas? Ocean Coastal Manag. 49 : 342 354. Cooke,S.J. and Schramm,H.L. 2007. Catch and release science and its application to conservation and managament of recreational fisheries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 73 79. Crabtree, R.E., Cyr,E.R., Chacon Chaverri,D., McLarney,W.O., and Dean,J.M. 1997. Reproduction of Tarpon, Megalops atlanticus, from Florida and Costa Rican Waters and Notes on Their Age and Growth. Bull. Mar. Sci. 61 : 271 285.
131 Dimmick, R.W. and W.D. Klimstra. 1964. C ontrolled duck hunting in Illinois. J. of Wildlife.Manag. 28(4): 676 688. Hilborn, R .and Walters C.J. 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics, and Uncertainty. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. New York. 570pp. Luo,J., Ault,J.S. Larkin,M.F., Humston,R., and Olson,D.B. 2008. Seasonal Migratory Patterns and Vertical Habitat Utilization of Atlantic Tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) from Satellite PAT Tags. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisher ies. CRC Press, pp. 275 299. McCauley,R.D., Fewtrell,J., and Popper,A.N. 2003. High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113(1): 638 642. Miller, R.J. 1990. Properties of a well managed fishery. Fisheries: 15: 7 12. Pelletie r,C., Hanson,K., and Cooke,S.J. 2007. Do catch and release guidelines from state and provincial fisheries agencies in North America conform to scientifically based best practices? Environ. Manag. 39 : 760 773. Popper,A.N., Fewtrell,J., Smith,M.E., and McCle ave,J.D. 2003. Anthropogenic sound: effects on the behavior and physiology of fishes. J. Mar. Tech. Soc. 37 : 35 40. Sand,O., Enger,P.S., Karlsen,H.E., Knudsen,F., and Kvernstuen,T. 2000. Avoidance responses to infrasound in downstream migrating European s ilver eels, Anquilla Env. Biol. Fish. 57 : 327 336. Schroeder,D.M. and M.S.Love 2002. Recreational fishing and marine fish populations in California. CalCOFl Rep. 43 : 182 190. Seyoum,S., Tringali,M.D., and Higham,M. 2008. Development of 15 polymorphic micr osatellite markers in the Atlantic tarpon ( Megalops atlanticus ) for capture recapture studies. Molec. Ecol. Res. 8 : 126 128. Skomal,G.B. 2007. Evaluating the physiological and physical consequences of capture on post release survivorship in large pelagic fishes. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14 : 81 89. Ward, R., Blandon, I.R., de Leon, F.G., Robertson, S.J., Landry, A.M., Anyanwu, A.O., Shenker, J.M., Figuerola, M., Gesteira, T.C., Zerbi, A., Acuna Leal, C.D. and Dailey W 2008. Studies in conservation genetics of tarpon ( Mega lops atlanticus ): microsatellite variation across the distribution of the species. In: J.S.Ault (ed.). Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisheries. CRC Press, pp. 131 145. Wikelski,M. and Cooke,S.J. 2006. Conservation physiology. Trend s in Ecol. Evol. 21 : 38 46.
132 Young,J.L, Bornick,Z.B., Marcotte, M.L., Charlie,K.N., Wagner, G.N., Hinch, S.G. and Cook S.J. 2006. Integrating physiology and life history to improve fisheries management and conservation. Fish Fish. 7 : 262 283.
133 Table 4 .1 : E stimates of Atlantic tarpon total annual catch and number released from 2003 2009. Data presented are total catch (harvested + released) and reported percent standard errors (PSE) and numbers of tarpon reported as being caught and released alive by angler s and the associated PSE presented for the state of Florida and for the Gulf and Atlantic coasts ies Statistics Survey (MRFSS). The asterisk (*) denotes where PSE is greater than 20%, and therefore statistically unreliable. All fishing modes and areas were combined for this analysis. Florida Gulf Coast Atlantic Coast Year Catch PSE Released PSE Catch PSE Released PSE Catch PSE* 2003 56,520 10.8 55,824 10.9 44,541 12.0 44,541 12.0 11,979 25.0 2004 74,585 12.8 72,173 13 62,896 14.2 60,485 14.4 11,689 28.7 2005 89,558 13.5 89,558 13.5 58,680 17.3 58,680 17.3 30,878 21.3 2006 64,070 14.8 64,070 14.8 47,212 18.3 47,212 18.3 16,858 23.7 2007 82,948 13.1 76,67 9 12.5 44,019 15.7 44,019 15.7 38,929 21.6 2008 84,776 13.8 84,776 13.8 55,485 17.6 55,485 17.6 29,291 21.9 2009 54,894 14.4 54,894 14.4 46,265 15.4 46,265 15.4 8,629 39.8 Mean 72,479 13.3 71,139 13.3 51,300 15.8 50,955 15.8 21,179 26.0
134 Figure 4 .1 : Estimated annual release mortality based on the National Marine Fisheries released tarpon along the Gulf co ast of Florida during 2003 2009. Numbers are cal culated using the combined catch and release mortality rate of 13% representative of the southwest and west central recreational fishery (Gulf Coast, broken, red line) that includes post release shark predation. The estimated release mortality excluding sh ark attacks (solid, blue line) attributed to handling and physiological disruptions (5%) during angling events represent the number of tarpon that could be potentially controlled for by anglers to increase survival. Error bars represent plus and minus the proportional standard errors reported with the MRFSS data.
135 APPENDIX A: FOUL HOOKED TARPON
136 APPENDIX A (CONTINUED) Table AA.1: Specific hook locations for the nine tarpon that were classified as foul hooked and their associated fate (survivor, mortali ty) in the catch and release mortality study in BGP and TB, 2002 release shark attack. A foul hooked fish was defined as one hooked in a part of the body other than the mouth. Fish hooked in the sutures of the premaxillary, ma xillary bones (upper jaw) and the dentary bone (lower jaw) or the soft buccal tissues in the corner of the mouth were considered fair hooked. Hook type (straight shank (J), circle (C), treble (T)), bait type (artificial (A), cut (C), live (L)), whether or not the hook was removed prior to release, and the condition of the tarpon at the time of and swimming capability are also included. Date Hook Location Fate Hook Type Bait Type Hook Removed Release Condition 6/24/2002 Cheek/Head Mortality J A Yes Poor 6/26/2002 Cheek/Head Survivor J A Yes Good 6/1/2004 Cheek/Head Mortality* C A Yes Good 6/15/2005 Cheek/Head Survivor J C No Poor 6/22/2007 Cheek/Head Survivor C C No Fair 5/6/2003 PecFin Survivor J L Yes Poor 7/12/2006 Deep Survivor J L No Fair 7/24/2006 Deep Mortality* J L No Poor 8/4/2006 Gills Mortality T A No Fair
137 APPENDIX B: A SUMMARY OF SELECTED POST RELEASE MOVEMENTS FROM ACOUSTICALLY TAGGED ATLANTIC TARPON IN BOCA GRANDE PASS AND TAMPA BAY 2002 2007
138 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) Acoustic telemetry was used to assess the effects of catch and release fishing on the survival of Atlantic tarpon, Megalops atlantics, in two Gulf coast locations that support a popular r ecreational fishery, Boca Grande Pass (BGP) and Tampa Bay (TB) during the 2002 2007 seasons. Understanding the effect of fishing on the survival of these released tarpon is critical to understanding how a stock might be impacted when harvest is not occurri ng. Details of the study design and references for the concepts behind this study may be found in Chapter Two. Presented here is a brief summary of some of the tarpon movements observed in this study. Plots of individual tarpon movement were prepared usin g GIS (ArcView). Swimming speeds in km/hour were calculated based on the straight line distances measured between each way point on the plot and divided by the total number of minutes the tarpon was tracked. In general, each of the 82 tarpon ultrasonical ly tagged and tracked from 2002 2007 in BGP and Tampa Bay did one of three things after release: remained in the vicinity where it was tagged, swam immediately towards or up into Charlotte Harbor or Tampa Bay, or swam immediately toward the Gulf away from its release site (offshore towards open water or along the beaches; Figure AB.1 A C). Some tarpon swam away rapidly upon release but returned to the release vicinity within the short term tracking period (Figure AB.2). Tarpon tagged in the upper, middle and lower portions of TB mid to late season (June July) typically remained in the vicin ity of where they were tagged. Each of the
139 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) tarpon whose movements are depicted in Figure AB.3 was heard on subsequent sampling days and the rea cquired signals came from within visible bait schools. Fish number 150 was, in fact, visually observed feeding at the surface just 1.5 hours post release (Figure AB.3 B). Excluding mortalities, 23 out of 71 (32%) of the tagged and tracked tarpon that su rvived the angling event were heard again on subsequent days. T arpon tagged in the passes that left the area during the short term tracking period often returned to the vicinity of capture the following day or up to two weeks later throughout the season (M ay August, Figure AB.4A to D). This indicated that tarpon exhibited site fidelity to the pass early and late in the spawning season. Reacquired signals also helped to verify that a tarpon survived the short term tracking time when it was not tracked the fu ll term due to equipment failure (Figure AB.4 C) or highly active swimming behavior upon release (Figure AB4.D). If keeping up with extremely active fish would have required breaking or bending the hydrophone pole in the boat side mount the tracks were ter minated early. Tarpon number 200 (Figure AB4.D) experienced the longest angling duration of tagged tarpon in this study (139 minutes) and was not exhausted from the fight. The tarpon had surface which tended to make the fights longer. At its release, research biologists were unable to keep up with two weeks later, so it survived. When fish number 20 0 was lost 30 minutes post release, it had swam a total of 8.77 km as determined by summing the straight line distances traveled between each waypoint (Figure AB.4D).
140 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) The average swimming speed of tarpon tracked in Tampa Bay was 2 .85 km/hour 0.51 S.E. and ranged from 0.12 to 17.54 km/ hr. The 17.54 km/hour was simply the 8.77km distance doubled as if fish number 200 (Figure AB4.D) had maintained its swimming speed for the full hour. Excluding that fish because it was not tracked a full hour, the upper range of average swimming speeds during a tracking period was 5.86 km/hour (Figure AB.2, fish number 146.). The average swimming speed in TB was slightly lower than the average (4.46 km/hr) observed by Edwards (1998) in BGP (range: 3. 33 to 5.37 km/hr). In general, distance traveled by tagged tarpon was highest during the first hour post release (Figure AB.5). Angling duration did not seem to affect the direction of movement exhibited by the tarpon despite the range of observed fight ti mes (4 to 139 minutes). Four different tarpon each fought for 30 minutes in BGP showed four different movement patterns post release (Figure AB.6). A 30 minute fight time was longer than average (22.7min) for tagged tarpon in this study. Tarpon subjected to extreme circumstances during the angling events (for example catch and release followed by a shark attack) sometimes made long journeys immediately following release and survived (Figure AB.1C). Fish number 175 was witnessed in the jaws of a hammerhead shark, but minutes after during the tracking a tarpon rolled off the bow of the research vessel and the transmitter was visually observed and acoustically confirmed in the fish by the field crew when it gulped air at the surface. Tarpon number 180 was not as fortunate and suffered a fatal attack despite its ability to recover from a poor release condition and swim for three hours (Figure AB.7A). Tarpon
141 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) such as this one, whether offshore or in the bay, tended to follow the contours of the followed shorelines or channels after release (AB.7B and AB.2). Topography and bait availability were two of the anecdotal observations that seemed to affect where tarpon remained after catch and release. In cases where the signal stopped moving but no obvious attack was witnessed and mortality was suspected, the representative plots showed the waypoint tracking data piling up in one place (Figure AB.8). This partic ular fish was viewed on a deployed SplashCam and was missing its tail and had a bite out of its stomach. The associated vector plot also showed the signal bearings from latter waypoints were in the same direction. Acoustic telemetry proved to be a valuabl e tool to track movements of tarpon after catch and release angling events. Several tracked tarpon were observed back in the schools of fish and feeding after release. Topography and prey availablility seemed to influence post release movements. Numerous s ignals were heard on subsequent days which also confirm a more long term post release survival. True long term studies are needed to confirm survival rates beyond six hours, but these studies are costly and labor intensive. The data collected were used to estimate the short term catch and release mortality rate of tarpon in BGP and TB and telemetry continues to be a successful method used to evaluate fisheries that are predominantly catch and release, particularly for large pelagic or migratory species.
142 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) A. Figure A B .1: Representative plots of post release movements of three tagged tarpon from Tampa Bay that: A) remained in the vicinity of where it was tagged, B) returned to the pass or place of release, and C) swam into the Gulf o f Mexico. Each GPS position every 15 minutes. Arrows with tarpon silhouettes exemplify it s path in chronological order. Filled colored points indicate date(s) the signal was heard and are also shown overlaid on a GIS depth contour map.
143 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) B. Figure A B .1 : Continued
144 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) C. Figure A B .1 : Continued
145 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) A. Figure A B .2: Representative plots of post release movements of two tagged tarpon from the beaches of St. Pe tersburg, FL, that returned to its place of release within t he short term tracking period (A and B) approximate GPS position every 15 minutes. Symbol details as in Figure A B .1
146 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) B. Figure A B .2 : C on tinued
147 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) A. Figure A B .3 : R epresentative plots of post release movements of three tagged and tracked tarpon that were heard again on subsequent days in each portion of Tampa Bay: upper bay (A), middle bay (B) and lower Bay at the Sunsh ine Skyway Bridge (C). The inset map of (B and C) indicates the area where the tarpon remained for the latter portion of its track in a thick school of baitfish. Symbol details as in Figure A B .1
148 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) B. Figure A B .3 : Continued
149 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) C. Figure A B .3 : C ontinued
150 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) A. Figure A B .4 : R epresentative plots of post release movements of four tagged and tracked tarpon from the mouth of Tampa Bay near Egmont Key that were h eard again on subsequent days (A D) Tarpo n showed some site fidelity to the pass early in the season (A) and late in the season (B). Other times the signal was reacquired as a way to confirm survival of a fish that was not tracked the full term due to technical failures of the tracking equipment (C) or when the fish was swimming so quickly at release that the tracking vessel could not keep up with it (D). Symbol details as in Figure A B .1.
151 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) B. Figure A B .4 : Continued
152 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) C. Figure A B .4 : C ontinued
153 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) D. Figure A B .4 : Continued
154 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) Figure AB.5: Mean distance traveled (in kilometers) by tagged tarpon tracked during the first four hours post release in Tampa Bay, 200 5 2007.
155 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) Figure A B 6 : Represe ntative plots of post release movements of four tagged tarpon that were caught using artificial breakaway jigs and fought for 30 minutes in Boca Grande Pass and: A) swam into Charlotte Harbor, B) remained in the pass, C) swam into the Gulf of Mexico and re turned, and D) swam into the Gulf but was not detected again
156 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) A. Figure A B 7 : Representative plots of tarpon movements for f ish number 180 (A) and fish number 179 (B) which exemplify fish that follow ed depth contours and channels al ong its path Note: Fish number 180 was preyed upon three hours post release Symbol details as in Figure A B .1
157 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) B. Figure AB. 7 Continued.
158 APPENDIX B (CONTINUED) Figu re A B. 8 : Representative plot of a tar pon whose signal stopped moving in Boca Grande Pass and was later confirmed to be dead when the image of the fish was captured on the deployed splash cam.
159 APPENDIX C: LIST OF VARIABLES RECORDED AND CREATED AND THEIR DESCRIPTIONS FOR TARPON PHYSIOLOGY
160 A PPENDIX C (CONTINUED) Variable ($denotes categorical): Description: FishID$: Unique identifier for each tarpon Month$: Month of sample Year$: Year of sample AirTemp: Air temperature in Degrees Celsius Weather$: Categorical variable qualitatively de scribing weather WaterTemp: Water temperature in Degrees Celsius DO: Dissolved oxygen (ppm) SAL: Salinity (ppt) pH: pH of water SizeClass$: Adult or Sub adult Angle$: Angled or control adults HandlingTrt$: Sub adults : Air H, 60 seconds of air e xposure while held horizontally out of the water; Air V, 60 seconds of air exposure while held vertically out of the water; NoAir, no air exposure; RS C rapidly sampled control animals. Adults : Percussion, euthanized control animals; Angled. Hook up: The time a tarpon was hooked, recorded as clock time Time Landed/TOD: TOD time of death for adult control animals. Time Landed For adults released alive after angling, this was the time a uman might have been recorded as the time in the sling, but not too often. For sub adults landed is the time the fish was placed in the v tray (No air, RS C) or net (Air V, Air H). If it was a tarpon subjected to 60 seconds of air exposure, the fish was considered landed BEFORE this treatment started. Fightr: Fight time (rounded to nearest half minute). This was c alculated as the Time Landed minus Hook up time; also called angling duration.
161 A PPENDIX C (CONTINUED) PBHr: Pre Bleed Handling time (rounded to nearest quarter minute). Defined as all excess handling of the fish after it was landed but before it was stuck with a needle. This may include gaffing, towing, photos, logistics and struggles associated with getting the fish into the v try or sling, removing scales for sticks, and the 60 seconds of air exposure in treatment. All PBH was measured prior to the 1 st stick of a needle. Calculated as Bleed Tim e Start minus Time Landed Bleed Time Start: This was the time of 1 st needle stick (typically a green tube). Bleed Time End: Time noted when blood filled the tube (green and grey) that was placed onto ice. If it was a quick bleed, where the green and g rey tubes filled bleed, the time the tube was done being filled was used. TBT_secs: Total Bleed Time (in seconds); Calculated as Bleed Time End minus Bleed Time Start or alternativel y, the time of first needle stick until the last tube fills (Green or grey, but usually grey). This is the amount of time the tarpon was in the sling or v tray until all blood was drawn. TBTgn_secs: Total bleed time for green tube (seconds) TBTgy_secs: Total bleed time for grey tube (seconds, used for lactate test only) THTr: Total Handling Time (rounded to nearest quarter minute). It is the sum of three times: Fightr + PBHr + TBTr Time placed on ice: Green and grey tubes may have had different time s. Stopwatch times were converted to clock time, so person at the field laboratory could use a watch for processing times. Time Spun: Clock time green and grey tubes were placed in centrifuge for plasma separation Total processing time: Calculated as Time Spun minus Time placed on ice This was recorded in minutes. Time included transport via boat to get blood to the beach for processing. If total processing time was 60 minutes or more the sample was discarded. SL: Standard Length (mm) FL : For k Length (mm) TL: Total Length (mm)
162 A PPENDIX C (CONTINUED) Girth: Measured in front of dorsal fin and around the fish (mm) Weight: Formula estimated weight or measured weight of tarpon (kg) ReleaseTime: Clock time of when tarpon was released to pon d or Gulf of Mexico RlsCondition$: Qualitative release condition 1, 2, 3 (good, fair, poor) BleedMethod$: Gill vs. Caudal venipuncture only adults have this HCT: Whole Blood parameter hematocrit (percent RBC volume) Hb: Whole Blood parameter hem oglobin (g/dL) Lactate: Metabolite in plasma (mmol/L) Glucose: Metabolite in plasma (mg/dL) Calcium: Electrolyte in plasma (mg/dL) Sodium: Electrolyte in plasma (mEq/L) Potassium: Electrolyte in plasma (mEq/L) Chloride: Electrolyte in plasma (mEq /L) Magnesium: Electrolyte in plasma (mEq/L) Phosphorus: Electrolyte in plasma (mg/dL) Cortisol: Hormone in plasma (g/dL) Sticks: Number of needle sticks tarpon received before bleeding. BoatH_secs: Variable created post hoc as sum of pre bleed ha ndling seconds and total BoatHgn_secs: Variable created post hoc as above but for the handling time to fill the green tube used in analyses. BoatHgy_secs: Variable created post hoc as abov e but for the handling time to fill the green tube used in analyses.
163 A PPENDIX C (CONTINUED) Grey, Time on needle: Time GREY tube went on the needle before blood starts filling. It might have been the same as fill time if a fast bleeder. If multiple st icks were required, the time that the grey tube which was successfully filled with blood was placed on the needle was recorded. As an aside, the number of sticks needed before blood was successfully drawn was noted. Green, Time on needle: Time GREEN tub e went on the needle before blood starts filling. It might be the same as fill time if a fast bleeder. If multiple sticks were required, the time that the green tube which was successfully filled with blood was placed on the needle was recorded. It may hav e been multiple tubes. As an aside, the number of sticks needed before blood was successfully drawn was noted.