xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8 standalone no
record xmlns http:www.loc.govMARC21slim xmlns:xlink http:www.w3.org1999xlink xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance
leader 00000nas 2200000Ka 4500
controlfield tag 008 000000c19749999pautr p s 0 0eng d
datafield ind1 8 ind2 024
subfield code a M39-00171
El precio que pagamos: contribucin del ecoturismo a la conservacin en Monteverde, Costa Rica
The price we pay: ecotourisms contribution to conservation in Monteverde, Costa Rica
Recent increase in travel has made tourism one of the highest revenue producing industries worldwide (Inman Draft). Ecotourism has grown in Costa Rica, due to the 5% of global biodiversity and high percentage of protected habitat that the country possesses (Inman Draft). Ecotourism is defined as contributing to the local communities as well as conservation of the natural habitats it is based. I conducted numerous surveys were conducted in Monteverde, Costa Rica, which is an area with ecotourism companies, hotels and restaurants. It was found that the reserves, ecotourism companies and organizations are contributing about 9.68% of their annual revenue to conservation of the Cloud Forest. Tourists were also surveyed in order to determine their willingness to pay for a high quality nature-based experience. It was determined that 97.5% of tourists are willing to pay if they are guaranteed their money is going directly to conservation and environmental education. I suggest that a voluntary ecotax will allow more ecotourism revenue to find its way to ongoing conservation efforts.
El aumento reciente en los viajes ha hecho del turismo una de las mayores industrias productoras de ingresos en todo el mundo (Borrador Inman). El ecoturismo ha crecido en Costa Rica, debido al 5% de la biodiversidad mundial y alto porcentaje del hbitat protegido que posee el pas (Proyecto Inman). El ecoturismo se define como un contribuidor con las comunidades locales, as como la conservacin de los hbitats naturales en que estn basados. Lleve a cabo numerosas encuestas en Monteverde, Costa Rica, que es una zona con empresas de ecoturismo, hoteles y restaurantes.
Text in English.
Ecotourism--Economic aspects--Costa Rica
Natural resource management and policy
Manejo de recursos naturales y poltica
Tropical Ecology 2006
Ecologa Tropical 2006
t Monteverde Institute : Tropical Ecology
1 The price we pay: E cotourismÂ€s c ontribution to c onservation in Monteverde, Costa Rica Corrie Haley Department of Environment and Natural Resources Economics, University of Rhode Island ABSTRACT Recent increase in travel has made tourism one of the highest revenue producing industries worldwide Inman Draft . E cotourism has grown in Costa Rica, due to the 5% of global biodiversity and high percentage of protected habitat that the country possess es Inman Draft . Ecotourism is defined as contributin g to the local communities as well as conservation of the natural habitats it is based. I conducted n umerous surveys were conducted in Monteverd e, Costa Rica, which is an area with ecotourism companies, hotels and restaurants. It was found that the reser ves, ecotourism companies and organizations are contributing about 9.68% of their annual revenue to c onserv ation of the Cloud Forest. Tourists were also surveyed in order to determine their willingness to pay for a high q uality nature based experience. I t was determ ined that 97.5% of tourists are willing to pay if they are guaranteed the ir money is going directly to conservati on and environmental education. I suggest that a voluntary ecotax will allow more ecotourism revenue to find its way to ongoing co nservation efforts . RESUMEN El aumento reciente de l viaje ha hecho la renta de turismo uno de la mÃ¡s alta que produce de las industrias mundiales Inman D raft. El ecoturismo ha crecido en Costa Rica, debido a la 5% de la biodiversidad global y el porcen taje alto del hÃ¡bitat protegido que el paÃs posee Inman D raft . El ecoturismo esta definido como contribuyendo a la cultura local y conservaciÃ³n de los hÃ¡bitates naturales que lo esta basado. Numerosas entrevistas llevaron a cabo en Monteverde, Costa Rica , que es un Ã¡rea con compaÃ±Ãas de ecoturismo, los hoteles y los restaurantes. Fue encontrado que las reservas, las compaÃ±Ãas del ecoturismo y organizaciones contribuyen acerca de 9 , 68% de su renta anual a la conservaciÃ³n del Bosque Nuboso. Los turistas se estuvieron entrevistados tambiÃ©n para determinar su consentimiento a pagar por una experiencia naturaleza basado de alta calidad. Fue determinado que 97, 5% de turistas estÃ¡ dispuesto a pagar si ellos son garantizados su dinero esta contribuyido directament e a conservaciÃ³n y educaciÃ³n ambiental. Sugiero que un ecotax voluntario permitirÃ¡ mÃ¡ s renta del ecoturismo pagar p a ra esfuer zos progresivos de conservaciÃ³n . INTRODUCTION T ravel has increased with the rise of the global population and incomes. In 1990 i t was estimated that $230 billion US dollars were spent by roughly 425 million international travelers, making tourism the fastest growing i ndustry on earth, with a n annual growth rate of 9% Isaacs 2000. Ecotourism is a relatively new concept of travel t o natural areas with goals to sustain the local culture and contribute to conservation Lindberg 2001. Hiking, canoeing, photography, observing wildlife and other similar activities that do not involve the taking of wildlife are considered ecotourism. According to Isaa cs 2000, in the United States, 3,120,000 people spent US$222 million on observing,
2 photographing and feeding wildlife in 1991, and overall total expend itures by birdwatchers surpassed all over ecotourists. In 198 1 the total expenditur es of birdwatchers was estimated to be $US20 million Isaacs 200 0 . Costa Rica has success in attracting ecotourists due its high biodiversity . This small country contains an estimated 5% of the worldÂ€s species in the wide range of ecosystems Inman D raft. In order to maintain high number s of ecotourists, it is in the best interest of the industry to use the ir revenue for the conservation of these highly biodiverse and profitable areas. Conservation consists of sensible and careful use of natural re sources including environmental education, land purchase, land protection and legal actions Hunter 2002. The development of ecotourism is an experience based market that depends on high quality natural area s . I t is the hope of conservationists that th is market will provide funding for wildlife conservation as well Isaacs 200 0 . Even though conservation is purportedly funded by ecotourism, this is not always the case. In NepalÂ€s protected areas a mere 18% of the revenue generated by ecotourism was co ntributed to protection and management of the areas Walpole et al. 2003. This study examines whether ecotourism is truly contributing to conserving the natural environments upon which it capitalizes on. The purpose of this investigati on was to determi ne whether revenue from ecotourism activities is being spent on conservation of the Cloud Forest in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Nadkarni and Wheel w right 2000 state that in 1992 about US$5 million was generated by the area through ecotourism, yet only 13% w as spent on the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, the largest natural attraction for tour ists in the area. I am also investigating the percentage of profits that ecotourism generates that is spent on conservation efforts such as environmental education, la nd purchase, la nd protection and legal actions. I n order to ensure the future of the Cloud Forest , an increased amount of funding from ecotourism, the industry that utilizes it the most , it is necessary. METHODS Study Site Monteverde, Costa Rica is one of the largest areas of privately owned reserves in the world, which contains about 29,000 hectares of protected habitat Cavanagh 2005; Weinberg et al . 2002. Within this protected area there are 100 species of mammals, 400 species of birds, 500 species of butterflies, 120 species of reptiles and amphibians, 2,500 species of plants, 500 species of trees and 1000s of insects can be seen Nadkarni and Wheel w right 2000 . The reserve is an ideal wildlife viewing area with its vast amount of biodiversity. In 19 80, Monteverde became a prime destination for ecotourists and d uring this time of growth hotels and rest a u r ants multiplied a significant amount. By 1998 there were 15 hotels and more than 20 smaller inns . In total there were 450 rooms and over 1000 beds for tourists . Hotels and r estaurants were followed by assorted gift shops, which s ell multitudes of gifts, local crafts, books and postcards Nadkarni and Wheel w right 2000. After the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve established a limit to the number of vi sitors who could enter the reserve , there was further incentive for nature walks, tree
3 canopy tours, horseback riding stables and other small businesses to open. The goal s of these businesses were to serve as an educational function , promote conservation and sustainable development in the area as well as produce profit. Travel literature soon featured Monteverde as a Âmust visi tÂ‚ Nadkarni and Wheel w right 2000 when traveling to Costa Rica. This attracted higher numbers of tourists , who although had litt le knowledge of Monteverde , came with an awareness of the importance of rainforest conserv ation Nadkarni and Wheel w right 2000. This zone contains a patchwork of private reserves such as, the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve and the Santa Elena Cloud F orest Reserve, as well as industries with private forest including Sky Walk Sky Trek , the Ecological Farm, and SelvaTura. The area is also saturated with hotels, eco lodges and restaurants, making it a suitable environment for my study. Conducting Surveys Information about revenue gained from nature based tourism by reserves, ecotourism companies and the Mo nteverde Conservation League was collected through interviews . These interviews were conducted with the management of each of the selected locations. The reserves and companies include the major reserves and attractions with forest landholdings: the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, the Santa Elena Forest Reserve, Sky Walk Sky Trek, the Ecological Farm and SelvaTura. The survey used for interviews inq uire d about the number of tourists received per year, how revenue is used , if any contributions to conservation are made and the importance of ecotourism to Monteverde. Concurrently , data collected through in person interviews with 40 tourists from 6 dif ferent locations in the Monteverde Zone took place ; the Hotel Belmar, El Establo Hotel, the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, the Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve, SelvaTura and La Pension de Santa Elena. Different locations were chosen in order to ensure a broad spectrum of respondents ; ranging from the luxury traveler to the backpacker on a budget. The data collected from the survey correlate d to touristsÂ€ stay in Monteverde in a financial manner. H ow much money is being spent by tourists on different a spects of their trip and their willingness to pay for nature based activities is investigated . Using the Contingent Choice Method to Determine Willingness to Pay In order to accurately determine an individualÂ€s willingness to pay, the contingent choice method was used. This method involves giving the participant two options of a hypothetical situation and different prices accompanying the options to determine preference Walpole et al. 2003. For this survey the method allow ed a determination of how m uch respondents would pay to enter a described reserve. Two hypothetical reserv es were described in the survey. O ne reserve was represented as a well protected area, with education prior to entry on what trail to use and what may be seen in the reserve. The second reserve was described in the survey as being more d isturbed and solely a reserve map would be received prior to entrance. The prices of the two reserves were then changed for each survey between US$10 and US$20 , in order to determine
4 how much a tourist would be willing to pay . By using this indirect method a respondent is less inclined to lie about their preference and their willingness to pay could be determined Biodiversity Advisory Committee 2005 . RESULTS EcotourismÂ€s Contribution to Con servation According to the interviews that were conducted regarding the reserves, ecotourism companies and the Monteverde Conservation League, only 9.68% of the annual revenue generated does return to t he Cloud Forest. Annually, about US$5,620 , 982 is prod uced through ecotourism in Monteverde, yet only about US$544,315.40 is invested back into the Cloud Forest Table 1. The largest contributor to conservation is the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve making up about 68.2% of the money, followed by the Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve , 17.1%, and lastly the Monteverde Conservation League contributes 14.7% to conservation. The Monteverde Conservation League , which attracts about 4,000 tourists annually Figure 1 , contributes all of its revenue from the Childre nÂ€s Eternal Rainforest back into some form of conservation. These forms of conservation include administration, legal action and protection, as they currently do not have the funds for ed ucational programs or expansion . The Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reser ve works in conjunction with the community and the money generated from its 18,000 visitors yearly is divided between the Santa Elena High School and maintenance of the r eserve. According to the administration of the Ecological Farm about 1,000 tourists annually , it does participate in some conservation such as donating money to the scho ols and reforestations projects. The Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve contributes 60% of the revenue it receives to protection of the reserve , research of the forest , vis itor Â€ s needs , administration and facilities. In 2004 this reserve received about 74,000 tourists K. Masters pers. Comm. . Conversely, Sky Walk Sky Trek, which receives 40,000 tourists a year, does not contribute to conservation efforts in Monteverde, nor does it contribute to environmental education. Also, SelvaTura receives the highest number of tourists per year, 78,000 visitors, and has the highest prices for entrance fees for all of the ecotourism activities surveyed, yet it does not actively part icipate in conservation . Tourist Distribution Tourists travel from all over the globe to experience the Cloud Forest of Monteverde. Of the 40 travelers surveyed, 39% of them were from the United States of America, 14% from Canada, 12% from Spain, 8% came from England and another 8% were from the Netherlands. Tourists from Germany composed 7% of the surveys while Sweden, South Africa, France and Scotland each composed 3% of the total distribution Figure 2. Of the 40 tourists, who vacation to the Mon teverde Zone, 31% visited the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, 16% participated in SelvaTura, 14% visited the Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve, 8% participated in Sky Walk Sky Trek and 1% visited the
5 Ecological Farm. 30% of the tourists who completed the survey visited other ecotourism companies such as th e Night Walk, Coffee Tours, t he Monteverde Cheese Factory, the Canopy Tour, ChildrenÂ€s Eternal Rainforest and a variety of other attractions found in the area. Of the tourists that participated in the in terviews, 32 visited more than one of ecotourism a ttractions on their vacation to Monteverde Figure 3. Where are tourists spending their money? It is evident through the surveys that tourists have spent the most money for hotels, followed by ecotouris m activities , and then meals. An average of US$68 Â± 118 SD n=40 is spent by travelers , who stay a mean of 2.74 Â± 0.93 SD n=40 days, fo r hotels in the Monteverde area. US$68 is the highest expense, followed by an average of US$60 Â± 67.1 SD n=40 spent on participating in ecotourism activities. Meals comprise roughly US$42 Â± 45.1 SD n=40 , only about US$20 Â± 30.15 SD n=40 is spent on souvenirs and transportation in the Monteverde Zone averages to be US$2 Â± 6.3 SD n=40 Figure 4. Tourists Willingness to Pay for Conservation After inquiring about touristÂ€s willingness to pay for the hypothetical reserves presented, the results demonstrate that 87.5% of the tourists were willing to pay for a well protected forest. A reserve w here the visitor is educat ed was preferred by 35 of the respondents, as opposed to a less protected, more disturbed forest, where little education takes place. T he average price a tourist was willing to pay for an entrance fee was US$15 Â± $3 SD n=40 . Although 50% of the people w ould still pay for the less protected forest, 87.5% of the people were more willing to pay higher than the average price asked for the well protected forest Figure 5. It was also found that 97.5% of the people surveyed would pay an additional ecotax of US$1 if they were ensured that it would be contributed directly to conservation and environmental education. DISCUSSION Where has the money gone? It is evident from the data collected that ecotourism does not contribute as much as it could to the conse rvation of the Cloud Forest in Monteverde, Costa Rica . About 9.68% of the annual revenue created from ecotourism is contributed to conservation efforts. This is a small percentage being used to protect the Cloud Forest, which is the major attraction for tourists. The money is used more to sustain the business than the resource upon which it relies. The majority of the money is being spent on hotels ~US$68 and even though the tourists travel to Monteverde to see the Cloud Forest, yet the hotels contribut ion to conservation was not investigated in the study . Ecotourism activities are a close second with an average of ~US$60. The ecotourism companies that draw in the most visitors such as SelvaTura and Sky Walk Sky Trek do not contribute directly to c onservation . In the case of SelvaTura, it is still paying for the land that comprises its park and is not interested in purchasing more land.
6 M uch of the revenue generated returns i nto the business aspects of the park . The Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve is one of the major tourist attractions in the Monteverde area and contributes 60% of it s earnings to conservation , yet the other 40% was not accounted for during the survey . This leads to the speculation that e cotourism can not be relied on as a flawles s source of revenue to protect natural areas Isaacs 2000 . Tourists are Willing to Contribute As said by Walpole et al. 2003 econo mic estimation techniques have that the value visitors place on protected natural areas is usually a g reat deal higher t han prices charged . Tourists are willing to pay more for an experience in the Cloud Forest than they presently are ; especially if they know their money is directly effecting conservation and /or environmental education. Data show ed that 87.5% of tourists surveyed were willing to pay higher entrance fees of up to $US20 for a well protected forest. A Proposition for the Future Based on the data collected through the surveys, tourists are will ing to pay for both conservation and nature based education . An overwhelming percentage of tourists 97.5% would readily pay US$1, if they were guarante ed that it would be contributed to conservation efforts . This leads to the idea of a voluntary ecotax of a flat rate in Monteverde . An ecotax is an additional fe e added to a total price to pay for negative impacts caused by humans on the environment and influences ecological decisions of individuals Backhaus 1998. The revenue created from this environmental tax could provide money directly to conservation and environmental education. Due to the large number of visit ors in the Monteverde area, an ecotax could contribute a great deal to conservation of the Cloud Forest. The proposed ecotax could be a voluntary addition to the total price of hotel stays since a visitor would pay once for their stay in a hotel in Monteverde. A traveler would be more likely to contribute an ecotax once, in addition to their hotel fee as opposed for every meal they have in the area or for every entrance fee. T ourists could be no tified of this option by providing them with various channels of information at the hotel reception re garding participation in the ecotax. 25% of the tourists interviewed were traveling with a packaged tour; therefore package tours could be given the opti on of participating in the ecotax as well. According to Inman Draft, nature tourists are willing to spend more money than other tourists. With their willingness to pay to support the feasibility of this proposition, a great deal of money could be contr ibuted. Even if only half of the visitors who traveled to Monteverde participated in the ecotax over US$100,000 could be generated to conserve the Cloud Forest. Profits from a voluntary ecotax would be most beneficial by funding the ChildrenÂ€s Eternal Rai nforest. The data collected from the surveys suggest that the Monteverde Conservation League used the most of its revenue for conservation purposes, with approximately 100% of it going back into the forest. The addition of the ecotax earnings could help revive educational programs for the ChildrenÂ€s Eternal Rainforest and allow the Monteverde Conservation League to purchase more land on the Pacific slope , which is in need of protection . Although this program would rely heavily on the participation of the hotels in
7 Monteverde, an ecotax is a realistic solution. Tourists want to help conserve, they just need a conduit as to how. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Alan Masters for his s pirited guidance as well as Cam ryn m and Tom for their patience and willingness to help in this project . Many thank s the Hotel Belmar, El Establo, the Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve, the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, SelvaTura, and La Pension de Santa Elena for allowing me to interview the tour ists that were visiti ng in order to collect my data. I would also like to thank Sky Walk Sky Trek, the Ecological Farm, and the Monteverde Conservation League for participating in my surveys. L astly, I would like to thank my fellow CIEE students for all the memorable moments; from the climb we will never forget to all our run ins with la Policia. LITERATURE CITED Biological Diversity Advisory Committee. 2005. Making Economic Valuation Work for Biodiversity Conservation. Department of Environment and H eritage. Australia. < http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/publications/economic valuation/choice.html > Backhaus, Dr. JÃ¼rgen G. 1998. The Law and Economics of En vironmental Taxation: When Should the Ecotax Kick In? University of Maastricht. Netherlands. pp. 2 3 C avanagh, Erin. 2005. Monteverde, Costa Rica: Balancing Environment and Development. Monteverde Institute. pp.1 18 Hunter, Malcolm L. 2002. Fundamentals of conservation biology. Inman, Dr. Crist. Draft. Impacts on developing countries of changing production and consumption patterns in developed countries: A case of ecotourism in Costa Rica. In: United Nations Environment Programme. pp. 1 56 Isaacs, Ja ck Coburn. 2000. The limited potential of ecotourism to contribute to wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 28 :61 69 Lindberg, Kreg. 2001. Tourist ÂConsumptionÂ‚ of Biodiversity: Market Characteristics and Effects on Conservation and Local Dev elopment. In: World Bank/OECD Workshop on Market Creation for Biodiversity Products and Services. 2001 January. Paris, France. pp. 1 32 Nadkarni, Nalini and Wheelwright, Nathaniel. 2000. Monteverde: Ecology and Conservation of a Tropical Cloud Forest. Oxford University Press, New York, page 351 388 Walpole, Matthew J. et al. 2001. Pricing Policy for Tourism in Protected Areas: Lessons from Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Conservation Biology. 15 :218 227 Weinberg, A., S. Bellows and D. Ekster. 2002. S ustaining Ecotourism: Insights and Implications from Two Successful Case Studies. Society and Natural Resources. 15 :371 380.
8 TABLES Table 1 Average annual contribution to conservation through ecotourism activities in Monteverde, Costa Rica. The a verage entrance fee was used for each ecotourism activity. If it was there was not contribution or it was unclear as to the percentage contributed to conservation 0% was used. Ecotourism companies/ R eserves/ O rganizations Average entrance fee paid US$ A nnual number of visitors Average annual revenue generated US$ Contribution to conservation % Average annual contribution to conservation US$ SelvaTura $50.10 Â± 29.1 SD n=22 78,000 $3,907,800 0% $0 Sky Walk Sky Trek $20.50 Â± 15.5 SD n=6 40,000 $820,000 0% $0 Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve $10.33 Â± 4.5 SD n=3 18,000 $185,940 50% $92,970 Ecological Farm $ 8.33 Â± 4.16 SD n=3 1,000 $8333 0% $0 Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve $8.36 Â± 5.4 SD n=11 74,000 $618,909 60% $371,345.40 Monterverde Conservation League BEN $20 Â± 11.5 SD n=17 4,000 $80,000 100% $80,000 Total 215,000 $5,62 0 , 982 $544,315.40
9 FIGURES Figure 1 The yearly distribution of the number of tourists who visit the reserves, ec otourism activities and the Monteverde Conservation League. The Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve 3 4.4 % is a major attraction, along with SelvaTura 3 6.3 % and Sky Walk Sky Trek 18.6 %. Figure 2 global distributions of t ouris ts visiting Monteverde, Costa Rica between 10/26/2006 and 11/14/2006 . Tourists travel from developed countries with high incomes allowing them to afford international travel and a nature based experience . 18,000, 8.4% 40,000, 18.6% 74,000, 34.4% 78,000, 36.3% 4,000, 1.9% 1,000, 0.5% Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve Sky Walk Sky Trek Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve Santuario Ecologico SelvaTura Monteverde Conservation League 39% 3% 12% 7% 3% 8% 8% 14% 3% 3% USA Scotland Spain Germany France England Nether lands Canada South Africa Sweden
10 16 8 14 1 29 29 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SelvaTura Sky Walk & Sky Trek Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve Ecological Farm Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve Other Ecotourism Activities Number of Respondents Figure 3 Number of v isitors who participate in e cotourism activities and reserves that are visited in Monteverde, Costa Rica between 10/26/2006 and 11/14/2006 . Note that 29 of the 40 travelers surveyed visit the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, which contributes on 60% of its revenue to maintenance o f the facilities and protected areas. SelvaTura, an ecotourism attraction that does not contribute to conservation, attract ed 16 of the tourists interviewed during this time period.
11 $20 $3 $68 $60 $42 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 Souvenirs Transportation Hotel Ecotourism Activities Meals How money is being spent in Monteverde Amount spent $ Figure 4 Average amount of money s pent by tourists in M onteverde, Cos ta Rica between 10/26/2006 and 11/14/2006. Tourists spend an average of US$68 Â± 118 n=40 on h otel s tays , US$60 Â± 67.1 n=40 on ecotourism activities an d average of US$42 Â± 45.1 n=40 is spent on meals.
12 35 20 5 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 A B Reserve Descrbied Number of Respondents Yes No Figure 5 The number of respondents who were wil ling to pay a given entrance fee for the hypothetical reserve described in the tourist survey. The entrance fees varied between US$10 and US$20. More respondents are willing to pay the higher cost for the well protected, diverse Reserve A, where they are educated as to where to go and what trails to use. Although Reserve B was more disturbed and only included a map, 50% of tourists were still willing to pay the entrance fee.
13 APPENDIX A
14 APPENDIX B Questionnaire #: _____ Tourist Survey Purpose: To collect data from tourists in order to determine how much of the revenue from ecotourism is being spent on conservation efforts in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Date: __________________ Location: __________________________________ __ 1. What country are you from? _______________________________ 2. How many people are you traveling with? ______________ 3. What is the reason for your stay here in Monteverde i.e. vacation, education, research, etc.? __________________________________________ ______ 4. How long is your stay? __________________________ 5. Approximately how much have you spent on the followingin the Monteverde area: a. Souvenirs? $______ b. Transportation? $______ c. Hotels? $______ d. Eco Tours and Entrance fees? $_______ e. Meals? $___ ____ 6. What Eco tours or activities have you participated in here in Monteverde? a. SelvaTura ___ b. Sky Walk and Sky Trek ___ c. Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve ___ d. Ecological Farm ___ e. Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve ____ f. Other __________________________________ ____________________ ____________________________________________________________ ________________________ 7. Are you here on your own or with a packaged tour? _______________________ 8. Of the two options, which would you be most likely to choose? Forest A : A well protected old growth and partially regenerated forest, with a dense canopy, numerous species of birds, monkeys, lizards as well as other small vertebrates and invertebrates. Prior to entering the forest you are educated as to what you may see, which of the dirt trails to use and general Âforest etiquetteÂ‚. For this experience you will have to pay an entrance fee of $______.
15 YES NO Forest B : A mixture of old growth forest and regenerated forest, with a dense canopy at times, many birds of the sam e species, some monkeys, and a few other small vertebrates and invertebrates. After paying your entrance fee of $_____, you enter the wide, paved trails with a map of the reserve. YES NO 9. Would you be willing to pay an additional $1 contribution ecota x for conservation or environmental education? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Ecotourism Survey Purpose: To collect data from ecotourism companies and organizations in order to determine how much of the revenue from ecotourism is being spent on conservation efforts in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Date:_______________________ Company/Organization Name:_______________________________________________ 1. How would you define Ecotourism? ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ 2. On average how many tourists are received pe r year?_________________ 3. How much do you charge for your services? _______________________ 4. Is any portion contributed to conservation efforts education, preservation, protection, legal action? Yes No __________________________________________________ __________ ____________________________________________________________ 5. Do you receive money from other sources? a. Donated? ____ b. Grants?____ c. Other:________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ _________ ____________________________
16 6. How is your revenue divided in order to sustain your business? ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ 7. If the number of tourists visiting per ye ar were to almost double would you contribute more of your profit towards environmental education? YES NO 8. If the number of tourists visiting per year were to almost double would you contribute more of your profit towards expanding your reserve/conserva tion of forest? YES NO 9. How important is ecotourism to the economy of Monteverde? ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________