Still no archaeological evidence that Neanderthals created Iberian cave art
- Permanent Link:
- Still no archaeological evidence that Neanderthals created Iberian cave art
- Series Title:
- Journal of Human Evolution
- White, Randall
Conkey, Margaret W.
Corchón Rodriguez, Soledad
de la Rasilla Vives, Marco
González Gómez, Jesús
González-Morales, Manuel R.
González-Pumariega Solis, Manuel R.
Aránzazu Martinez-Aguirre, María
Medina Alcaide, María-Ángeles
Moro Abadia, Osca
- Publication Date:
- Subjects / Keywords:
- Paleolithic Cave Art ( local )
Uranium-Thorium Dating ( local )
Open System ( local )
Age Overestimation ( local )
Neanderthal Art ( local )
- serial ( sobekcm )
- Based on uranium-thorium (U-Th) dating of calcite deposits overlying paintings in three Spanish caves, Hoffmann et al. (2018a) have proposed that a rectangular sign at La Pasiega (Cantabria), hand stencils at Maltravieso (Cáceres) and red traces on stalagmites at Ardales (Málaga) are at least 65,000 years old. Consequently, the authors claim Neanderthal authorship of the first parietal art in Europe. This proposition is alarming to many archaeologists (Aubert et al., 2018a, Pearce and Bonneau, 2018, Slimak et al., 2018; but see Hoffmann et al., 2018b, Hoffmann et al., 2018c), due to the multiple sources of error inherent in this dating method, notably the leaching of uranium resulting in an overestimation of sample ages (Plagnes et al., 2003, Ortega et al., 2005, Scholz and Hoffmann, 2008, Pigeaud et al., 2010, Borsato et al., 2003 Bajo et al., 2016, Valladas et al., 2017a). The possible overestimation of the U/Th dates is not discussed in Hoffmann et al. (2018a). Instead they considered that a correct stratigraphy is enough to prove a closed system because â€œit is highly unlikely that leaching of U or incorporation of Th would simultaneously affect all of its layersâ€ (Hoffmann et al., 2016b:110). The results presented by Hoffmann et al. (2018a) are especially troubling since they contradict more than one hundred years of research observations on the Neanderthal and modern human archaeological record. The authors seem to abandon that whole body of archaeological knowledge and reasoning, instead placing all their trust in physicochemical measurements. This approach is puzzling given that certain of the coauthors have previously railed against â€œthe interpretative abuses derived from the uncritical application of â€˜hard scienceâ€™ analytical methods to the study of the Palaeolithic rock art phenomenonâ€ (Alcolea-González and González-Sainz, 2015:1). While absolute dating methods have certainly modified some of our ideas about the chronology of rock art in Europe, the application of these methods (including U-Th dating) i
- Source Institution:
- University of South Florida Library
- Holding Location:
- University of South Florida
- Rights Management:
- This object is protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
No images or PDF downloads are available for this resource.
Cras ut cursus ante, a fringilla nunc. Mauris lorem nunc, cursus sit amet enim ac, vehicula vestibulum mi. Mauris viverra nisl vel enim faucibus porta. Praesent sit amet ornare diam, non finibus nulla.
Cras efficitur magna et sapien varius, luctus ullamcorper dolor convallis. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Fusce sit amet justo ut erat laoreet congue sed a ante.
Phasellus ornare in augue eu imperdiet. Donec malesuada sapien ante, at vehicula orci tempor molestie. Proin vitae urna elit. Pellentesque vitae nisi et diam euismod malesuada aliquet non erat.
Nunc fringilla dolor ut dictum placerat. Proin ac neque rutrum, consectetur ligula id, laoreet ligula. Nulla lorem massa, consectetur vitae consequat in, lobortis at dolor. Nunc sed leo odio.