Criteria and methods for delineation of groundwater source protection areas
- Permanent Link:
- Criteria and methods for delineation of groundwater source protection areas
- Series Title:
- International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts
- J.F, Quinlan
M. Schindel, Geary
- Publication Date:
- serial ( sobekcm )
- Only one of the five standard criteria for delineation of a groundwater-source protection area (GSPA), identification of flow boundaries, is valid in unconfined carbonate aquifers. The most powerful method for reliable delineation of flow boundaries of a GSPA in such aquifers- indeed, the essential and only method for reliably doing so at other than faults, lithologic contacts, and water bodies - is groundwater tracing, usually with fluorescent dyes, and preferably with hydrogeologic mapping and contouring of a sufficient amount of relevant potentiometric data. Hydrogeologic mapping alone and discharge balancing, the latter using base-flow discharge, normalized base-flow (discharge per unit area), and hydrogeologic mapping, can each be used to estimate a GSPA, but such mapping or balancing is not a replacement for the judicious use of tracer tests.
The most dangerous, misapplied criterion for GSPA delineation in any unconfined carbonate aquifer is time of travel (TOT) that is not based on tracer tests. Its use, when based on calculations from aquifer tests or on computer modeling, each of which assumes porous-medium equivalency and Darcian flow, is self-delusory and gives a false sense of security. In consideration of what is now known about flow velocities from more than 2250 tracer tests from 25 countries, use of non-tractt-based 10T in unconfined carbonate aquifezs is not defensible.
Hydrogeologic mapping, combined with tracer-test and potentiometric data, has been successfully used to delineate a GSPA for a group of springs in a groundwater basin in Mississippian limestones of west-central Kentucky that is a water supply for approximately 36,000 people. No computer model could have predicted the tracer-test results or the basin boundaries - and had them recognizable as valid - unless confirmatory tracer tests had been conducted. The results of tracer testing are moderately predictable, but they can only be detennined empirically.
- Original Version:
- International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 33 (2016-07-01).
- Source Institution:
- University of South Florida Library
- Holding Location:
- University of South Florida
- Rights Management:
- This object is protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
No images or PDF downloads are available for this resource.
Cras ut cursus ante, a fringilla nunc. Mauris lorem nunc, cursus sit amet enim ac, vehicula vestibulum mi. Mauris viverra nisl vel enim faucibus porta. Praesent sit amet ornare diam, non finibus nulla.
Cras efficitur magna et sapien varius, luctus ullamcorper dolor convallis. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Fusce sit amet justo ut erat laoreet congue sed a ante.
Phasellus ornare in augue eu imperdiet. Donec malesuada sapien ante, at vehicula orci tempor molestie. Proin vitae urna elit. Pellentesque vitae nisi et diam euismod malesuada aliquet non erat.
Nunc fringilla dolor ut dictum placerat. Proin ac neque rutrum, consectetur ligula id, laoreet ligula. Nulla lorem massa, consectetur vitae consequat in, lobortis at dolor. Nunc sed leo odio.