Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals


previous item | next item

Citation
Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals

Material Information

Title:
Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals
Series Title:
Science advances
Creator:
Alex, Bridget
Barzilai, Omry
Hershkovitz, Israel
Marder, Ofer
Berna, Francesco
Caracuta, Valentina
Abulafia, Talia
[15 others]
Publisher:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Date:
Physical Description:
1 online resource

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Radiocarbon dating ( lcsh )
Paleolithic period ( lcsh )
Genre:
serial ( sobekcm )
Location:
Asia -- Israel

Notes

Abstract:
The timing of archeological industries in the Levant is central for understanding the spread of modern humans with Upper Paleolithic traditions. We report a high-resolution radiocarbon chronology for Early Upper Paleolithic industries (Early Ahmarian and Levantine Aurignacian) from the newly excavated site of Manot Cave, Israel. The dates confirm that the Early Ahmarian industry was present by 46,000 calibrated years before the present (cal BP), and the Levantine Aurignacian occurred at least between 38,000 and 34,000 cal BP. This timing is consistent with proposed migrations or technological diffusions between the Near East and Europe. Specifically, the Ahmarian could have led to the development of the Protoaurignacian in Europe, and the Aurignacian in Europe could have spread back to the Near East as the Levantine Aurignacian.
Original Version:
Volume 3, Issue 11
General Note:
10 p.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of South Florida
Holding Location:
University of South Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
K26-05601 ( USFLDC DOI )
k56-05601 ( USFLDC Handle )

USFLDC Membership

Aggregations:
University of South Florida
Karst Information Portal

Postcard Information

Format:
serial

Downloads

This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text

PAGE 1

ANTHROPOLOGYCopyright2017 TheAuthors,some rightsreserved; exclusivelicensee AmericanAssociation fortheAdvancement ofScience.Noclaimto originalU.S.Government Works.Distributed underaCreative CommonsAttribution NonCommercial License4.0(CCBY-NC).RadiocarbonchronologyofManotCave,Israeland UpperPaleolithicdispersalsBridgetAlex,1*OmryBarzilai,2*IsraelHershkovitz,3,4OferMarder,5FrancescoBerna,6ValentinaCaracuta,7,8TaliaAbulafia,5LaurenDavis,5MaeGoder-Goldberger,5RonLavi,9EugeniaMintz,8LiorRegev,8DaniellaBar-YosefMayer,4,10,11Jos-MiguelTejero,12,13ReuvenYeshurun,14AvnerAyalon,15MiraBar-Matthews,15GalYasur,15AmosFrumkin,16BruceLatimer,17,18MarkG.Hans,17ElisabettaBoaretto8*ThetimingofarcheologicalindustriesintheLevantiscentralforunderstandingthespreadofmodernhumans withUpperPaleolithictraditions.Wereportahigh-resolutionradiocarbonchronologyforEarlyUpperPaleolithic industries(EarlyAhmarianandLevantineAurignacian)fromthenewlyexcavatedsiteofManotCave,Israel.The datesconfirmthattheEarlyAhmarianindustrywaspresentby46,000calibratedyearsbeforethepresent(calBP), andtheLevantineAurignacianoccurredatleastbetween38,000and34,000calBP.Thistimingisconsistentwith proposedmigrationsortechnologicaldiffusionsbetweentheNearEastandEuro pe.Specifically,theAhmariancould haveledtothedevelopmentoftheProtoaurignacianinEurope,andtheAurignacianinEuropecouldhavespread backtotheNearEastastheLevantineAurignacian. INTRODUCTIONAlthoughdistinctpopulationsofmo dernhumanslikelydispersedto Eurasiaatdifferenttimes,thegroup thatsuccessfullycolonizedEurope after~50,000yearsagowasassocia tedwithasuiteofbehavioraland technologicalinnovations,broadlyreferredtoastheUpperPaleolithic ( 1 ).Alongthedispersalroute,theLevantisakeyregionforunderstandingtheoriginsandspreadofUpperPaleolithictraditionsand peoples( 2 , 3 ).DuringthetemporalphaseknownastheEarlyUpper Paleolithic(EUP),thereweretwoarc heologicalculturesintheLevant attributedtomodernhumans,theEarlyAhmarianandtheLevantine Aurignacian(textS1)( 4 , 5 ).IthasbeenproposedthattheEarly AhmarianledtotheProtoaurignacianinEurope( 6 )andthatmakers oftheAurignacianinEuropebackmigratedtotheNearEast,producingtheLevantineAurignacian( 7 ). Thelikelihoodofthesehypothesesdependsonthesimilarities betweenindustriesandtheirrelativeages.Thisstudyfocusesonthe latter,addingnewdatatotheLevantineEUPchronologytotestproposedrelationsbetweenindustries.Althoughchronologyalonecannot provethesehypotheses,itcanbeconsistentwiththemoritcanrefute them,ifshownthataproposeddesce ndantindustryactuallypredated itsallegedantecedent. However,thusfar,thistesthasbeeninconclusiveforLevantine EUPindustriesbecausetheregionalchronologyisnotfirmlyestablished.DatesforAhmarianassemblagesdifferbyseveralmillennia betweensites,clusteringintoearlyappearancedates[~46thousand calibratedyearsbeforethepresent(kacalBP)]thatallowforan Ahmarian-Protoaurignaciandevelopment( 8 )andlateappearance dates(~40kacalBP)thatrefutethishypothesis(3 , 9 ).Regardingthe LevantineAurignacian,theavaila bledatesarenotpreciseenoughto evaluatewhethertheindustrycouldhavederivedfromtheAurignacian inEurope(3 ).Asitstands,theregionalch ronologyisdi fficulttoresolvebecauseitincludeschronometricsamplescollectedfromunclear contextsofoldexcavationsanddates producedthroughanalyticalproceduresthatfailedtodemonstratetheremovalofcontaminants. Here,wepresentaresearchprogramforradiocarbondating,designedtoamelioratetheseissuesthrough(i)theuseofgeochemical methodstocharacterizesamplesandtheirarcheologicalcontextsand (ii)experimentallydeterminedpretreatmentprocedures,customized forthedatedmaterials.Themethodologyisappliedtonewlyexcavated EUPassemblagesfromManotCave,Israel,resultinginahigh-resolution chronologyof47radiocarbondates.I ntegratingtheradiocarbondates, geoarcheologicalanalyses,andartifactanalysis,thefollowingminimumrangesaresuggestedforculturalphasesatManot:EarlyAhmarian, from46to42kacalBP;LevantineAurignacian,from38to34kacalBP; apost-LevantineAurignacianindu stry,from34to33kacalBP.These reliabledatesprovideafoundationfortheLevantineEUPchronology, whichisconsistentwiththehypothesesthattheAhmarianledtothe ProtoaurignacianinEuropeandthattheAurignacianinEuropegaverise totheLevantineAurignacianthroughthemovementofpeopleorideas.RESULTSSitedescriptionandcultural-chronometricsequence Excavatedfrom2010to2017,ManotisanactivekarsticcaveinnorthwestIsrael,about10kmfromthepresent-dayMediterranean(Fig.1) 1DepartmentofHumanEvolutionaryBiology,HarvardUniversity,Cambridge,MA 02138,USA.2ArchaeologicalResearchDepartment,IsraelAntiquitiesAuthority,POB 586,Jerusalem91004,Israel.3DepartmentofAnatomyandAnthropology,DanDavid CenterforHumanEvolutionandBiohistoryResearch,ShmunisFamilyAnthropologyInstitute,SacklerFacultyofMedicine,TelAvivUniversity,TelAviv,Israel.4TheSteinhardt MuseumofNaturalHistory,TelAvivUniversity,POBox39040,TelAviv6997801,Israel.5DepartmentofBible,ArchaeologyandtheAncientNearEast,Ben-GurionUniversityof theNegev,POBox653,Beer-Sheva8410501,Israel.6DepartmentofArchaeology,Simon FraserUniversity,8888UniversityDrive,Burnaby,BritishColumbiaV5A1S6,Canada.7LaboratoryofArchaeobotanyandPalaeoec ology,UniversityofSalento,Lecce73100, Italy.8MaxPlanck-WeizmannCenterforIntegrativeArchaeologyandAnthropology, DANGOORResearchAcceleratorMassSpec trometryLaboratory,WeizmannInstitute ofScience,Rehovot7610001,Israel.98DanStreet,Modi ’ in7173161,Israel.10Institute ofArchaeology,TelAvivUniversity,POBox39040,TelAviv6997801,Israel.11Peabody MuseumofArchaeologyandEthnology,Harva rdUniversity,CambridgeMA02138,U.S.A.12CNRS,UMR7041,ArScAnquipeEthnologieprhistorique,92023Nanterre,France.13Seminarid ’ EstudisIRecerquesPrehistriques,UniversitatdeBarcelona,08001Barcelona, Spain.14ZinmanInstituteofArchaeology,UniversityofHaifa,Haifa3498838,Israel.15GeologicalSurveyofIsrael,30MalkheIsraelStreet,Jerusalem95501,Israel.16InstituteofEarth Sciences,HebrewUniversityofJerusalem,Jerusalem91904,Israel.17DepartmentofOrthodontics,CaseWesternReserveUniversitySchoolofDentalMedicine,10900EuclidAvenue, Cleveland,OH44106,USA.18DepartmentofAnatomy,CaseWesternReserveUniversity, Cleveland,OH44106,USA. *Correspondingauthor.Email:balex@fas.harvard.edu(B.A.);omry@israntique.org.il (O.B.);elisabetta.boaretto@weizmann.ac.il(E.B.) SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 1of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 2

( 10 ).Amodernhumancalvaria,Manot1,wasrecoveredfromthecave surfacebutwasnotassociatedwithartifacts.Itwasuranium-thorium (U-Th) – datedtoaminimumageof54.75.5ka(11, 12).Thesite ’ s archeologicalfindsconstituteastr atifiedsequenceofEUPindustries (Table1,textS2,figs.S1andS4,andtablesS1andS2).Theuppermost culturalphase,locatedbythecaveentrance(areaE),isclassifiedas post-LevantineAurignacianandcont ainsendscrapers,burins,Dufour bladelets,andpartiallyretouchedtwistedbladelets.Itisunderlain byaLevantineAurignacianassemblage,characterizedbyendscrapers (carinated,nosed,andflat),carina tedburins,bladeswithAurignacian retouch,andDufourbladelets.TheAurignacianfindsalsoinclude boneawls,antlerprojectilepoints,shellbeads,andaperforatedred deercanine.Nearthebaseofthecave(areaC),anotherAurignacian depositoverlaysanEarlyAhmarianassemblage,characterizedbya technologyoflong,narrowblade/bladeletsfromuni-orbidirectional coresandatoolkitofendscrapers,burins,andel-Wadpoints.Asmall numberofInitialUpperPaleolithic(IUP)andMiddlePaleolithic(MP) artifactshavebeenfoundinthecav e,buttheseindustrieshavenotyet beenuncoveredinstratigraphicsequence. Here,wereport47radiocarbondatesusedtoestablishtheEUP chronologyandtounderstandsitef ormationprocessesatManot(Fig.2 andtableS5).Thedateswerepro ducedfrom41charcoaland6sedimentsamples,someofwhichweredividedandsubjectedtodifferent pretreatmentproceduresforatotalof86acceleratormassspectrometry (AMS)measurements(textsS4andS5andtablesS3andS5).Radiocarbondatesinthetextarereportedascalibrated68%probabilitydensityfunctions(PDFs).Datedsamplescamefromthemostintensively excavatedareas,EandC(textS2andfig.S1).Bythecurrentcaveentranceatthetopofthewesttalus,areaEhaspreservedoccupational surfacesindicatedbysemibrecciatedsediment,concentrationsofartifacts,andinsituhearths(fig.S2andtableS1).Datedcharcoalswere collectedfromhearthsinareaE( n =8),associatedwithpost-Levantine AurignacianandLevantineAurig nacianartifacts(fig.S10). AreaCisnearthebottomofthewesttalus,approximately30m southeastand20mbelowthecurrentcaveentrance(figs.S3and S11).Noclear-cutoccupationalsurfaceswereobservedthroughexcavationorgeoarcheologicalanalyses.However,anthropogenicmaterial seemstohavebeenredepositedinsequencefromprimarycontexts higherontheslope,resultinginapackageofAurignacianartifacts overlyingapackageofAhmarianartifacts(fig.S4andtableS2). Isolatedcharcoals( n =23),collectedfroma1.5-m-longsection, showincreasingagewithdepth,dividingintoayoungerandolder cluster.Theyoungerclusterof38to34kacalBPcamefromhigher inthesection(unit4andtopofunit5)associatedwithmostlyAurignacianartifacts.Theolderclusterof46to42kacalBPcamefrom lowerinthesection(unit7andbottomofunit6),associatedwith mostlyAhmarianartifacts.Onlythreedatesdeviatefromthispattern. Thesamples(RTD-7783A,RTD-7785,andRTD-7786)camefrom midwaythroughtheareaCsectionandshowreversestratigraphyor decreasingagewithdepth.This15-cmportionofthesection( z = 205.50to205.35)isrelativelyrocky,suggestingstrongerwateractivity,whichcouldhaveledtomixedandmissingdeposits.Wedo notconsiderthisareaofthesectionrepresentativeofthecultural sequenceandhaveexcludedthesedatesinestimatingtheagesof culturalphases. Radiocarbonpretreatmentandstatisticalanalysis Toremovecontaminantsfromfossilcharcoalsbeforeradiocarbon dating,laboratoriesroutinelyapplya numberofpretreatmentprocedures, Sources: USGS, ESRI, TANA, AND 050100 Kilometers 1 2 3 6,7 8 4 11 12 13 15 17 16 5 9 10 14 N Fig.1.MapofL evantineEUPsitesmentionedinthetext. Sitesincludedinregional chronologyarered.TheManotCaveisindicatedbyastar.1,a zl ;2,Ksr ‘ Akil;3, Manot;4,Kebara;5,WadiKharar16R;6,Hayonim;7,Meged;8,Raqefet;9,Qafzeh; 10,NahalEin-GevI;11,Mughrel-Hamama h;12,TorSadaf;13,BokerA/BokerTachtit; 14,NahalNizzanaXIII;15,QadeshBarnea;16,LagamaVII;17,AbuNoshra.USGS,U.S. GeologicalSurvey;ESRI,EnvironmentalSystemsResearchInstitute;TANA,Telugu AssociationofNorthAmerica;AND,AutomotiveNavigationData. Table1.Excavationcontextsanddaterangesofculturalphases. CulturalphaseContextdated DaterangescalBP 68.2%(samplenumber) Post-Levantine Aurignacian Insituoccupationalsurfaces AreaE,unit2,layerI,loci 500and501 34,030 – 33,050(6) Levantine Aurignacian Insituoccupationalsurfaces AreaE,unit2,layerIV, locus502 36,860 – 35,960(2) Secondarytalusdeposit AreaC,unit4;areaC,unit 5above z =205.50 38,260 – 34,050(11) AhmarianSecondarytalusdeposit AreaC,unit6below z = 205.35;areaC,unit7 45,940 – 41,560(8) 49,440 – 41,600(9) SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 2of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 3

includingtheacid-base-acid(ABA)method,acid-basewetoxidation (ABOx)method,andsteppedcombustion.Controlledstudies,comparing theeffectivenessofdifferentpretreatmentprocedures,haveproducedinconclusiveresults.Numerousstudieshaveyieldedolderandmore reliabledateswiththeharsher ABOxandsteppedcombustion methods( 13 , 14 ).However,studiesofcharcoalsfromcertainLevantineEUPsitesfoundthatABA-treatedfractionshadbetterpreservationparametersandolderorstatisticallyindistinguishabledates comparedtotheirABOx-treatedpairs(textS4,fig.S8,andtable S4)( 8 , 9 , 15 ).Theseresultsindicatethattheappropriatepretreatment methodforfossilcharcoaldependsonthepreservationstateanddepositionalenvironmentofthesamplesandthusshouldbeexperimentallydeterminedforagivensite( 8 , 16 ). Here,experimentalcharcoalsfromManotwereseparatelydivided intohomogenizedsubsamplesandtreatedwithsixdifferentprocedures:ABA,ABOx,andthosemethods,followedbysteppedcombustionto630or900C(textS4,fig.S6,andtableS3).Thefractions treatedbyABAwithoutsteppedcombustionproducedthesmallest percentmoderncarbon(pMC)valuesandFouriertransforminfrared(FTIR)spectra,showingtha tsedimenthadbeenremovedfrom samples(fig.S7).Radiocarbondatesofthetotalorganiccarbonin sedimentwere16to10kayoungerthanassociatedcharcoals,sowe expectanycontaminationfromse dimenttohavemadedatesyounger ratherthanolder(textS5andtableS5).Thesecombinedresults — smallestpMCvaluesanddemonstratedremovalofyounger-aged sediment — indicatedthatABAwithoutsteppedcombustionwasthe mosteffectivemethodforcharcoalsfromManot.Werecommend themethodologyandparametersusedtoreachthisconclusion(FTIR andpMCbydifferentpretreatments)beusedinfuturestudiestodeterminethemosteffectivemethodforsamplesfromothersites,which maynotbethesameasManot. Bayesianmodelswereproducedthatconstraindatesbasedon stratigraphicinformationtotestforoutliersandestimatethespan ofculturalphases(textS6,fig.S12,andtablesS7toS9).However,our conclusionsarebasedontheunmodeledranges,whicharelessinfluencedbyinterpretationsofstratigraphyanddepositionalhistory. Theculturalspanmodel(model1)co mprisedthreesequentialphases ofAhmarianbeforeAurignacianbeforepost-LevantineAurignacian. ItincludeddatesfromcombustionfeaturesofareaEandthesequenceinareaC(Jsquareswiththeexceptionofthreedatesdescribedabovethatshowedreversestratigraphy).Inthismodel,only 1of28dateswasidentifiedasanoutlier(fig.S12andtableS7). ThiswasRTD-7116,adateof49to48kacalBPthatissignificantly olderthananyotherradiocarbondatesfromManot.Althoughthe sampleproducedafiniteradiocarbonage(48,70070014CyearsBP), itextendsbeyondthe50,000-yearagelimitofthecalibrationcurve at95.4%confidenceandthereforemayexceedtheagelimitofthe radiocarbonmethod.Thesamplecamefrommidwaythroughunit 6andcouldbetheoldestAhmariandateatManotorrepresentan earlierphasebecauseartifactssuggestiveoftheIUPandMPwererecoveredfromthebaseofthesequence.Thelatterseemsmorelikely, consideringthetightspreadofotherAhmarian-associateddatesof 46to42kacalBP. Themodeledspanswerethesameastheunmodeledranges,except thattheAurignacianwasreduced to~2000yearsfromanunmodeled rangeof38to34kacalBPtoamodeledspanof37to35kacalBP. TheimprovedprecisioncomeswiththecaveatthatthereisnocontinuousinsitustratigraphicboundarybetweentheAhmarianand Aurignaciansequences;rather,theboundaryisinferredonthebasis ofartifactcompositionandclusteringofdatesinareaC(textS6).In contrast,theendoftheAurignacianisboundstratigraphicallybythe overlyinginsitupost-LevantineAurignacianlayerinareaE,datedto 34to33kacalBP.Moreover,themodeledrangealignswithdates fromthemostsecureLevantineAurignaciancontextatManot,the combustionfeatureinareaEdatedto37to36kacalBP. Area CUnit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6 Unit 7Area ELocus 502Locus 500Locus 501Post-Levantine Aurignacian Levantine Aurignacian Early Ahmarian(221.46.42) (221.41.36) (221.41.38) (221.02) (220.99) (220.37.19) (220.18) (220.08.02) (206.14) (206.03) (206.00) (206.00) (205.95) (205.95.94) (205.93) (205.70.60) (205.60.52) (205.56) (205.54) (205.50) (205.42) (205.38) (205.31.16) (205.31.16) (205.25.14) (205.06) (205.04.90) (205.03.91) (205.02.90) (204.80.70) (204.70.60)H4 H5NGRIP O () 2 2 221.4 2 ) 2 2 221.3 6 ) 2 2 221.3 8 ) ( 221.02 ) 2 20.19 ) 2 2 220.0 2 ) 2 2 205.9 4) Fig.2.RadiocarbondatesforarcheologicalchronologyofManotCave. SamplesfromareasEandC.JsquaresareshownasPDFscalibratedwithOxCal v4.2( 59 )andIntCal13( 60 ).Datesarelistedinstratigraphicsequencebylaboratory code,followedbyabsoluteelevationortheelevationrangeofthesample ’ sexcavationbasket.Theassociatedarcheologicalcultureisindicatedbycolor:postLevantineAurignacian,green;LevantineAurignacian,orange;EarlyAhmarian, pink.NGRIP,NorthGreenlandIceCoreProject. SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 3of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 4

DISCUSSIONImplicationsforLevantineEUPchronology InadditiontoManot,therearefoursiteswithlargesequencesof radiocarbondates(>10)producedbymodernanalyticalmethods andassociatedwithEUPassemblages(Figs.1and3,textS7,and datasetS1).ThreeofthesearecavesorrocksheltersalongtheMediterraneancoast:a zl inTurkey( 17),Ksr ‘ AkilinLebanon ( 9 , 18),andKebarainIsrael( 8 ).ThefourthisMughrel-Hamamah intheJordanValley( 19 ).Othersitesinthesouthernaridzone,includingAbuNoshraIandII,BokerA,QadeshBarnea,andthe Lagamansites,havefewerdates,andthoseweremostlyproduced inthe1970sandearly1980swithlessreliablemethods( 20 , 21 ). Thus,asitstands,theLevantineEUPchronologyisbasedonMediterraneancoastalsites,whichunderrepresenttheassemblagevariabilityoftheregion.Relationsbetweencoastalandaridsitesare unclear,andthetimingandcharacterofindustriesmayhavediffered betweenthesezones. Thepost-LevantineAurignacianassemblageatManotistightly datedto34to33kacalBPbycharcoalsfrominsitucombustionfeatures.Itissimilartoassemblages,describedasAtlitian,locatedinthe Mediterraneanzone(textS2).Theageoftheseassemblageshasbeen estimated~27or26kacalBP — youngerthantheManotdates — butis consideredproblematicbasedonlimi tedstratigraphicandchronometricdata( 22 , 23 ).ThesecureManotdatesdoalignwiththefewdates fromAtlitianlayersatKsr ‘ Akil(phase6,levelVI),approximately35 to32kacalBP( 9 , 18). Datesincludedintheregional chronologyfortheLevantine Aurignacian,comingfromKsr ‘ Akil( n =3)andKebara( n =7), havelargeuncertainties,whichonlyconstrainthetimingofthephase tosometimebetween42and34kacalBP.TheManotdataprovide arelativelylargesequenceofhigh-precisiondatesfortheindustry ( n =13),whichestablishesafirmchronologicalpegfortheLevantineAurignacianatleastbetween38and34kacalBPandprobably morepreciselybetween37and35kacalBP.TheLevantineAurignacianatManotisalsostratigraphicallyboundbytheinsitupostLevantineAurignaciansurfacedatedto34to33kacalBP.These chronostratigraphicdatasupportviewsthattheLevantineAurignaciansensustrictowasarelativelyshort-livedarcheologicalphenomenon(~2000years),restrictedtotheMediterraneanvegetation belt( 24). Kuhn et al . 2009 Douka 2013azl Ksar AkilDouka et al . 2013 Bosch et al . 2015 Manot Kebara MHM Area C Area E Bar Yosef et al . 1996 Rebollo et al . 2011 2012 2015 M&T 1989 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53Kcal BP 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53Kcal BP MP IUP Ahmarian Aurignacian Other or undetermined Charcoal ShellLegend Manot post-Lev Aurignacian Fig.3.RegionalchronologyofradiocarbondatesforstratifiedEUPsitesbetween50and30kacalBP. Verticallinesarecharcoaldates,andcrossedlinesareshell dates.Datesarecalibratedas68.2%PDFsusingtheOxCalv4.2software( 59 )andtheIntCal-Marine13calibrationcurve( 60 ).Datesarecolor-codedbyassociated archeologicalindustryandorganizedintocolumnsbysiteandstudy.Withinagivenstudy,datesareorderedinstratigraphicsequence(fromthelowestelevation orlayeronthelefttothehighestontheright),aspreciselyasthisinformationisknown.Theshadedblocksrepresentthephaserangesreportedbyparticularstudies. TheserangesaretheresultofBayesianmodels,withtheexceptionofManot,whichshowsthefullunmodeledrange.M&T,MellarsandTixier( 61 );MHM,Mughr el-Hamamah.Datesassignedto “ otherorundetermined ” donotnecessarilyrepresentthesameindustrybetweensitesandstrata.Siteanddateinformationisfoundin textS7anddatasetS1. SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 4of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 5

TheEarlyAhmarianappearstohavebegunby47.5to46kacalBP atKebara( 8 )andManotandthenaround43kacalBP( 18)or40kacal BP( 3 )atKsr ‘ Akilanda zl .This3000-to7000-yeardifference maybebecausepeopleatManotandKebaraproducedtheEarly AhmarianseveralthousandyearsearlierthanpeopleatKsr ‘ Akil anda zl .Thediscrepancymayalsoresultfrommischaracterizationofarcheologicalassemblagesorincorrectassumptionsthatnamed stonetoolindustriesweremadebysociallyrelatedpeople.However, therelevantassemblage satManot,Kebara,Ksr ‘ Akil,anda zl showahighdegreeoftechnotypologicalsimilaritywithinanarrow geographicandstratigraphicrange,correspondingtothe “ Northern EarlyAhmarian ” ( 25).TheEarlyAhmarianis thoughttohavedevelopedlocallyfromtheIUP( 26 , 27 ).Althoughthemoresouthernsites ofManotandKebaradonothavestratifiedIUPassemblages,the well-datedEarlyAhmarianlayersareearlierthanorcontemporaneouswiththeIUPatKsr ‘ Akilanda zl .Inthiscase,thepeople ofKsr ‘ Akilanda zl wouldhavegraduallydevelopedanindustry3000to7000yearsafteritwasfullydevelopedlessthan500km tothesouth. Alternatively,thedisagreementc ouldbeexplainedbydifferences inthereliabilityofradiocarbondatesrelatedtosamplecontext,material,andpretreatmentmethods(te xtS7).Regardingtheissueofcontext,radiocarbonsamplesfromManotwerecollectedduringrecent excavationsfromcombustionfeaturesandknownstratigraphic positions,whichwerecharacteriz edbyseveralgeochemicalmethods (textS3).Radiocarbonsample sfromAhmarianlevelsofKsr ‘ Akilwere recoveredinthe1930sto1940swithoutdatedexcavationmethods,and inthedecadessince,somespecimenslikelybecamemislabeledinterms ofprovenience( 9 ).Inaccurateproveniencesmayexplainthelarge numberofoutliersinBayesianmodelsthatconstrainKsr ‘ Akildates tostratigraphicposition[9of39datesinthestudyofDouka etal. ( 9 ) and6of16datesinthestudyofBosch etal. ( 18 )]. Next,lateappearancedatesfortheEarlyAhmarianfromKsr ‘ Akil anda zl wereproducedprimarilyfromshells,whereastheearly appearancedatesfromManotandK ebarawereproducedfromcharcoals.Evidencethatcontaminationhasbeenremovedfromsamples shouldbebasedonindependentanal ysesofthedatedmaterialsrather thantheagesobtained.Forcharcoal,severalsuchmethodshavebeen developed( 28 – 30 )andprovenreliableinintercomparisonstudies betweenlaboratories( 8 ).Forshell,itisdifficulttodetectanddemonstratetheremovalofdiageneticcarbonatefromtheoriginalbiogeniccarbonate( 31). Last,whendisagreementsarisebetweencharcoaldatesforagiven event,theolderdatesaregenerallyconsideredmorereliableandthe youngerdatesarethoughttoreflectcontamination( 32 , 33 ).Thisis becauseasmallamountofmoderncarbon(<1%)canmakeLatePleistocenesamplesappearthousandsofyearsyounger( 34 ).OurpretreatmentexperimentsshowedthatforcharcoalsfromManot,the ABAmethodproducedthesmallestpMCvalues(andoldestdates) andpurestFTIRspectra.Thesamepatternwasfoundforcharcoals fromKebara( 8 ).Wehypothesizethatthisisbecauseharshertreatments(ABOxandsteppedcombustio n)destroymoreofthecharcoals. Then,anysurvivingcontaminantclaycomprisesagreaterportionof themeasuredsample( 28 ),andsomeofthesecontaminants(forexample,siliceousaggregates)arereactivewithatmosphericCO2( 8 ).Because datedsedimentatManotisapproximately15to10kayoungerthan associatedcharcoals,contaminationfromclaywouldmakedatesyounger.Thus,wearguethattheAhmarianappearedintheLevantbyatleast 46kacalBPbasedontheearlyappearancedatesfromKebaraandManot. ThisageisalsoolderthansomedatesfortheAhmarianfromthe southernaridzonesoftheLevant(NegevandSinai)( 20, 21).Thearid zonedatesshouldbeviewedwithcautionbecausetheyincludeasmall numberofsamplesandwereproduceddecadesago.However,they highlightapotentiallyinterestingpatternforfutureresearchthatthe AhmarianmayhaveoriginatedinthecoastalLevantandthenspread southwardintothearidzones. ImplicationsforrelationsbetweentheNearEastandEurope Here,weusetheManotchronologytoevaluateproposalsthatthe AhmarianledtotheProtoaurignacianinEuropeandthattheEuropeanAurignacianledtotheLevanti neAurignacian.Thesehypotheses arefoundedonthepremisethatarcheologicalindustriescanbeused totracemigrationsandrelationso fpasthumangroups.Althoughthis approachiswidelyapplied,itmustbejustifiedforeachcontext( 35). Assemblagesshouldbesystematicallycomparedwithinaframework thatconsidersartifacttraitsresultingfromsociallylearned,idiosyncratic choicesinmaterialcultureproducti ontodistinguishbetweenhypothesesofindependentinventionandculturaltransmission( 36 ).Although thisresearchisongoing,itisalsoessentialtotesttheconclusionsagainst chronometricdata.Accuratechronologiesconstrainhypothesesbyrefutingscenariosthatdonotaccordwiththetimingofarcheological industries. IthasbeenproposedthattheLeva ntineAurignacianwasanintrusiveindustry,introducedbymakersoftheEuropeanAurignacian(text S1)( 7 , 37 – 39).TheviewthattheLevantineAurignacianwasnonlocal issupportedbystatisticalcompariso noftechnologicalandtypological traitsoflithicsfromKsr ‘ Akil,showingthatLevantineAurignacian levels(phase5,levelsVIIItoVII)differsignificantlyfromallother EUPlayers( 40 ).RegardingtiestotheEuropeanAurignacian,thebroad similaritiesincludethickscrapersmadeonflakes(nosed,carinated, andshouldered),Dufourbladelets,b one/antlerpoints,andanimaltooth pendants( 40– 43 ).Someofthesharedfeaturesarecharacteristicofthe EarlyAurignacian[AurignacianI( 44– 46 )],suchasAurignacianretouchedblades,scraperswithscalarlateralretouch,andflatcarinateditems( 7 , 39 ).However,otherfeatures,includingnosedand shoulderedpieces,twistedDufourbladelets,andsimple-basedantler points,resembletoolsofthelaterEvolvedAurignacian[Aurignacian IIandIII( 46, 47)].Thus,linkingtheLevantineAurignaciantoaparticularphaseoftheEuropeansequenceisanopenquestion,which mustbeaddressedthroughsystematiccomparisonsofassemblages betweenregions.Therehavebeenfewstudiesofthisnature,although Tostevin( 36 )showedthatblankproductionandtoolkitmorphology oflithicsfromAurignacianlayersofKebaraandCentralEurope (Strnskskla,CzechRepublic)aremoresimilartoeachotherthan toprecedingstrataateachsite.Inaddition,Tejero etal. ( 47)demonstratedsimilaritiesbetweenAurignacianassemblagesatManotand Europeintheusesandproducti onmethodsofosseoustools. Intermsofchronology,thesecureLevantineAurignaciandates fromManotarecontemporaneouswithorslightlylaterthanthe39.5 to35.5kacalBPmodeledstartdatesoftheEvolvedAurignacianin SouthwestFrance/NorthernIberiaatL ’ Arbreda,LaVia,andAbri Pa taudandsubstantiallylaterthanEarlyAurignacianassemblages, whichbeginbetween43.5and40kacalBPacrossEuropeatsitesincludingAbriPataud,Labeko Koba,andWillendorfII(48, 49 ).Thus, datesfromManotdonotrefutethehypothesisthattheLevantine AurignaciandevelopedfromaEuropeanAurignacianprecursor. ItisoftenclaimedthattheAhmarianledtotheEuropeanProtoaurignacian( 1 , 6 )basedonsharedfeaturesofshellornamentsand SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 5of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 6

long,straightblades/bladeletsproducedbysofthammerreduction, possiblyforprojectileweapons( 50 ).TheProtoaurignacianappears tobeintrusiveinEuropeansequencesbecauseitistypologicallyand technologicallydistinctfromassemblagesinprecedinglayers( 51 ). However,systematicstudiescompari ngAhmarianandProtoaurignacian assemblagesarelacking.TheAhmarian-Protoaurignacianhypothesis hasbeenchallengedbecauselateappearancedatesfortheAhmarian of~40kacalBPfromKsr ‘ Akilanda zl ( 3 )areyoungerthanthe earliestProtoaurignaciandateso f44to41kacalBPfromsitesincludingIsturitz,RiparoMochi,L ’ Arbreda,andFumane( 48).Incontrast, earlyappearancedatesfromManotandKebarabegintheAhmarian by46kacalBP,securelybeforetheearliestProtoaurignacian,andthereforeallowforthehypothesisthattheAhmarianoftheLevantgaverise totheProtoaurignacianofEurope. TestingproposedaffinitiesbetweentheAhmarianandProtoaurignacian,aswellastheEuropeanAurignacianandLevantine Aurignacian,willrequiremoresystematiccomparisonsofthematerialculturalremains(thatis,lithic,shell,bone,andantlerartifacts)fromeachregion.However,thesehypothesescannotbe evaluatedwithoutaccurate,high-precisionchronologies.Theresults fromManotCaveprovideachronologicalfoundation,whichis criticalforunderstandingthespreadofmodernhumansandUpper Paleolithictraditions.MATERIALSANDMETHODSRadiocarbondating Thearcheologicalchronologywasbasedonradiocarbondatesofcharcoals(Fig.2,Table1,andtableS5).InareaE,thecharcoalsamples wereselectedfromcombustionfeatures,whereasinareaC,charcoals werechosentocoverasmuchofthesequenceverticallyaspossible. Charcoalpieceswerecollectedbyhandduringexcavationorfromexposedsectionsandwrappedinaluminumfoilwithassociatedsediment. Severalcharcoalswerecollectedfrommicromorphologyblocks,asthe blockswerecutandremoved.Charcoalswereidentifiedusingametallographicmicroscope(NikonEclipseLV150N).Thevastmajorityof charcoalsatManotare Amygdalus sp.(almond),andalldatedspecimenswereidentifiedasbelongingtothistaxon.Nobonesyieldedcollagen.Approximately40bonesweresampled,collectedfromall excavationareas,andinvaryingtaphonomicstates.Althoughdietary andornamentalmarineshellswererecovered,theywerenotdated becauseitisunclearwhetherdiageneticcarbonatecanbeseparated fromoriginalbiogeniccarbonate( 31 ). Sampleswerecharacterizedandpreparedforradiocarbondating basedontailor-madeproceduresattheDANGOORResearchAcceleratorMassSpectrometry(D-REAMS)Laboratory(textS5)( 8 , 28 , 52). Beforeandafterpretreatment,sampleswereanalyzedbyFTIRspectrometrytotestthepurityofthematerial.Approximately50mgof eachcharcoalpiecewascleanedofsedimentwithascalpelandhomogenizedbycrushingwithanagatemortarandpestle.Mostsamples werethentreatedwiththefollowingABAprocedure:(i)acidtreatment in1MHClfor30min,followedbyrinsingwithNanopurewateruntil itreachedpH6,(ii)basetreatmentof0.1MNaOHfor15min,followed byrinsinguntilitreachedpH6,and(iii)acidtreatmentin1MHClfor 1hourinawaterbathof80C,followedbyrinsinguntilitreachedpH6. Becauseoftheirsmallsize,fourch arcoalsincludedinthechronology weretreatedwithawater-base-acidregime,whichfollowedthesame procedureexceptthatthefirstacidtreatmentwasreplacedbyawash withNanopurewater. Samplesweredriedovernightat~60C,combustedtoCO2with ~200mgofCuOat900C,andthenreducedtographiteinavacuum line.Foursamplesweredividedand underwentgraphitizationonthe standardvacuumlineandonanultra cleanline,dedicatedtosamples over30,00014CyearsBP.SampleswithlaboratorycodeRTDwere measuredbyAMSattheD-REAMSLaboratory( 53),whereasthose withRTKweremeasuredattheNationalScienceFoundation(NSF) – ArizonaAMSFacility,UniversityofArizona.StableisotopemeasurementswereconductedattheGeologicalSurveyofIsrael. Radiocarbondateswereproducedforsedimenttoevaluatehow contaminantsedimentwouldaffectcharcoaldates.Foursediment samplesweredirectlyremovedfro mdatedcharcoalsamples,andtwo additionalsedimentsampleswerecol lectedfromthesection.Thesedimentsampleswerecrushed,homogenized,andthendissolvedin1M HCl,followedbythreerinseswithNanopurewater.Theremaining fractioncontainedthe totalorganiccarbon(TOC)andwasprepared tographite,asdescribedabove.ThesedimentTOCdateswerebetween16,000and10,000yearsyoungerthantheirassociatedcharcoals(tableS5). Determinationofradiocarbonpretreatment Todeterminethebestpretreatment methodforcharcoalsfromManot, fourcharcoalsamplesfromareaC wereseparatelyhomogenized,divided,andpreparedbydifferentprocedures(textS4).Theseexperimentalcharcoalsweresubjectedtosixprocedures:ABA,ABOx,and bothofthosetreatmentsfollowe dbysteppedcombustionat630or 900C.TheABOxprocedureconsist edofthefollowing:(i)6MHCl for1hour,followedbyrinsingwi thNanopurewater,(ii)1MNaOH for1hour,followedbyrinsingwithNanopurewater,and(iii)0.1M K2Cr2O7in2MH2SO4at60Covernight.AfterrinsingwithNanopurewater,sampleswereoven-driedat105C.Thestepcombustion procedurefollowed(i)precombustionat300Cin750torrO2for 30min(thisshouldremovethemorerecentcontamination),(ii)combustionat630CwithCuOfor2ho ursinvacuumandcollectionof theCO2,and(iii)combustionat900CwithCuOfor3hoursand collectionoftheCO2.Intotal,31fractionsweremeasuredfromtheoriginalfourcharcoals.TheresultsarereportedaspMC(fig.S6andtableS3).The samebackgroundcorrectionof0.2630.032pMCwasappliedto allfractions,whichreflectsgraphitizationandAMSsteps.ThepretreatmentbackgroundcorrectionwasnotappliedsothatpMC valuesresultingfromdifferentprocedurescouldbedirectlycompared.Inthisway,thepMCvaluesindicatetheeffectivenessofthe specificpretreatments;however,abackgroundcorrectionreflecting graphitization,AMS,andpretreatmentwasappliedincalculating thereportedradiocarbondatesintableS5.Theresultsshowthat theABAtreatmentprocedurewithoutstepcombustionproduced thesmallestpMCmeasurementsando ldestages.Explanationsforthis patternarediscussedintextS4. Geoarcheologicalanalysis InconjuncturewithothergeoarcheologicalworkatManotCave,focusedmineralogicalanalyseswere conductedtosupportradiocarbon samplingandinterpretation.Theanalysesincludedmicromorphology,loosesedimentcharacterization,andexperimentalheatingof localcontrolsediment.Formicromorphologicalstudy,intactsedimentblocksweretakenfromthroughouttheverticalsectionofarea C(fig.S3)andfromspecificfeaturesinareaE.Air-driedblockswere impregnatedwithpolyester/styreneresin,cured,cutwitharocksaw, SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 6of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 7

andsenttoSpectrumPetrographics,wheretheywerepreparedinto 30m m-thinsections.Thethinsectionswereanalyzedwithapetrographicmicroscopeanddescribedusingconventionalcriteriaand terminology( 54 , 55 ).Loosesedimentsampleswerecollectedfrom surfaces,fromsections,andwithradiocarbonsamplesandthenanalyzedbyFTIR.ForallFTIRmeasurements,afewmilligramsofsample weregroundandhomogenizedwithanagatemortarandpestle.Approximately0.2mgofthesamplewasmixedwith~50mgofKBrpowderand pressedintoa7-mmpelletwithahandpress(QwikHandi-Press, Spectra-TechIndustriesCorporation)oramanualhydraulicpress (Specac).FTIRspectraweremeasuredataresolutionof4cm 1for 32scansbetween4000and400cm 1usingaNicolet380(Thermo FisherScientific)( 56 , 57 ).Spectraandphotographsofthinsections areavailableuponrequest. Controlsedimentwascollectedfromthesurfaceofthecavebase (areaA)foranexperimentalheatingstudy( 58 ).Thesedimentwas heatedtosettemperaturesandanalyzedbyFTIRtodeterminethe temperature-relatedtransformationsoftheclaymineralscontained inthelocalsediment.Thiscalibrationwasthenusedtoestimatethe temperaturesreachedbysedimentassociatedwithputativecombustionfeatures.Fiftygramsofsedimentwashomogenizedand separatedinto10samples(5geach).Thesampleswereplacedin ceramiccruciblesandheatedtodifferenttemperatures(0Cand 200to1000Cat100Cincrements) for4hoursinamufflefurnace (A.Mandel,T21typecoupledwithaEurotherm3216temperature programmer).Afterheating,thesedimentswereanalyzedbyFTIR, asdescribedabove. SUPPLEMENTARYMATERIALSSupplementarymaterialforthisarticleisavailableathttp://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/ content/full/3/11/e1701450/DC1 textS1.LevantineEUP textS2.Sitedescriptionandarcheologicalsequence textS3.Geoarcheologicalresults textS4.Charcoalpretreatment:ABA,ABOx,andsteppedcombustioncomparisons textS5.Charcoalpreservationandradiocarbonresults textS6.Bayesianmodeling textS7.Regionalchronology fig.S1.TopviewandprofileviewofManotCave. fig.S2.ExcavationareaEwithcombustionfeatures. fig.S3.AreaCshowinglocationsofradiocarbonsamplesandmicromorphologyblocks. fig.S4.ArtifactsfromManotCave. fig.S5.FTIRspectraofsedimentexposedtodifferenttemperaturesinexperimentalheating study. fig.S6.RadiocarbonmeasurementsofManotcharcoalsamplespreparedbydifferent pretreatments. fig.S7.FTIRspectraofcharcoalsamplebeforepretreatment,afterABA,andafterABOx. fig.S8.ComparisonofABAandABOxcharcoaldatesfromLevantineEUPsites. fig.S9.Characterizationof Amygdalus sp.charcoalbyscanningelectronmicroscopeandFTIR. fig.S10.CalibratedradiocarbondatesfromareaEplottedbyabsoluteelevation. fig.S11.CalibratedradiocarbondatesfromareaCplottedbyabsoluteelevation. fig.S12.Bayesianmodelsandoutlieranalysis. tableS1.LithicassemblageinareaE. tableS2.LithicassemblageinareaC. tableS3.RadiocarbonmeasurementsofManotcharcoalsamplespreparedbydifferent pretreatments. tableS4.ComparisonofABAandABOxcharcoaldatesfromLevantineEUPsites. tableS5.RadiocarbonsamplesanddatesforManotCave. tableS6.Excavationcontextswitharcheologicalclassificationsanddateranges. tableS7.OutputsofBayesianmodel1basedonculturalphases. tableS8.Culturalphaseestimatesforeightrunsofmodel1. tableS9.OutputsofBayesianmodel2basedonlithostratigraphicunits. datasetS1.Publisheddatesusedtoconstructregionalchronology. References( 62 – 116 )REFERENCESANDNOTES1.J.-J.Hublin,ThemodernhumancolonizationofwesternEurasia:Whenandwhere? Quat.Sci.Rev. 118 ,194 – 210(2015). 2.A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen, MoreThanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpper PalaeolithicDiversityintheNearEast (OxbowBooks,2003). 3.K.Douka,Exploring “ thegreatwildernessofprehistory ” :ThechronologyoftheMiddleto theUpperPaleolithictransitioninthenorthernLevant. MitteilungenderGesellschaftfr Urgeschichte 22 ,11 – 40(2013). 4.A.E.Marks,in PrhistoireduLevant:Chronologieetorganisationdel ’ espacedepuisles originesjusqu ’ auVIemillnaire ,J.Cauvin,P.Sanlaville,Eds.(ditionsduCNRS,1981), pp.287 – 298. 5.I.Gilead,in PrhistoireduLevant:Chronologieetorganisationdel ’ espacedepuislesorigines jusqu ’ auVIemillnaire ,J.Cauvin,P.Sanlaville,Eds.(ditionsduCNRS,1981),pp.331 – 333. 6.P.Mellars,ArcheologyandthedispersalofmodernhumansinEurope:Deconstructing the “ Aurignacian. ” Evol.Anthropol. 15,167 – 182(2006). 7.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,in TowardsaDefinitionoftheAurignacian ,O.Bar-Yosef, J.Zilho,Eds.(InstitutoPortu guesdeArqueologia,2006),pp.297 – 316. 8.N.R.Rebollo,S.Weiner,F.Brock,L.Meignen,P.Goldberg,A.Belfer-Cohen,O.Bar-Yosef, E.Boaretto,NewradiocarbondatingofthetransitionfromtheMiddletotheUpper PaleolithicinKebaraCave,Israel. J.Archaeol.Sci. 38 ,2424 – 2433(2011). 9.K.Douka,C.A.Bergman,R.E.M.Hedges,F.P.Wesselingh,T.F.G.Higham,Chronology ofKsarAkil(Lebanon)andimplicationsforthecolonizationofEuropebyanatomically modernhumans. PLOSONE 8 ,e72931(2013). 10.O.Barzilai,I.Hershkovitz,O.Marder,TheEarlyUpperPaleolithicPeriodatManotCave, WesternGalilee,Israel. J.Hum.Evol. 31 ,85 – 100(2016). 11.I.Hershkovitz,O.Marder,A.Ayalon,M.Bar-Matthews,G.Yasur,E.Boaretto,V.Caracuta, B.Alex,A.Frumkin,M.Goder-Goldberger,P.Gunz,R.L.Holloway,B.Latimer,R.Lavi, A.Matthews,V.Slon,D.B.-Y.Mayer,F.Berna,G.Bar-Oz,R.Yeshurun,H.May,M.G.Hans, G.W.Weber,O.Barzilai,LevantinecraniumfromManotCave(Israel)foreshadows thefirstEuropeanmodernhumans. Nature 520 ,216 – 219(2015). 12.I.Hershkovitz,B.Latimer,O.Barzilai,O.Marder,Manot1calvariaandrecentmodern humanevolution:Ananthropologicalperspective. BMSAP 29 ,119 – 130(2017). 13.M.I.Bird,V.Levchenko,P.L.Ascough,W.Meredith,C.M.Wurster,A.Williams, E.L.Tilston,C.E.Snape,D.C.Apperley,Theefficiencyofcharcoaldecontaminationfor radiocarbondatingbythreepre-treatments — ABOX,ABAandhypy. Quat.Geochronol. 22, 25– 32 (2014). 14.R.E.Wood,K.Douka,P.Boscato,P.Haesaerts,A.Sinitsyn,T.F.G.Higham,Testing theABOx-SCmethod:Datingknown-agecharcoalsassociatedwiththeCampanian Ignimbrite. Quat.Geochronol. 9 ,16 – 26(2012). 15.F.Brock,T.F.G.Higham,AMSradiocarbondatingofPaleolithic-agedcharcoalfromEurope andtheMediterraneanrimusingABOx-SC. Radiocarbon 51,839– 846(2009). 16.M.I.Bird,P.L.Ascough,Isotopesinpyrogeniccarbon:Areview. Org.Geochem. 42 , 1529 – 1539(2012). 17.S.L.Kuhn,M.C.Stiner,E.Gle,I.zer,H.Yilmaz,I.Baykara,A.Aikkol,P.Goldberg, K.M.Molina,E.nay,F.Suata-Alpaslan,TheearlyUpperPaleolithicoccupationsat a izliCave(Hatay,Turkey). J.Hum.Evol. 56,87 – 113(2009). 18.M.D.Bosch,M.A.Mannino,A.L.Prendergast,T.C.O ’ Connell,B.Demarchi,S.M.Taylor,L.Niven, J.vanderPlicht,J.-J.Hublin,NewchronologyforKsr ‘ Akil(Lebanon)supportsLevantineroute ofmodernhumandispersalintoEurope. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 112,7683 – 7688(2015). 19.A.J.Stutz,J.J.Shea,J.A.Rech,J.S.Pigati,J.Wilson,M.Belmaker,R.M.Albert,T.Arpin, D.Cabanes,J.L.Clark,G.Hartman,F.Hourani,C.E.White,L.NilssonStutz,Earlyupper PaleolithicchronologyintheLevant:NewABOx-SCacceleratormassspectrometryresults fromtheMughrel-Hamamahsite,Jordan. J.Hum.Evol. 85,157– 173(2015). 20.J.L.Phillips,in LateQuaternaryChronologyandPaleoclimatesoftheEasternMediterranean , O.Bar-Yosef,R.S.Kra,Eds.(RadiocarbonandAmericanSchoolofPrehistoricResearch, 1994),pp.169 – 176. 21.A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Appendix:radiometricdatesfortheUpper PalaeolithicoftheLevant,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPalaeolitic DiversityintheNearEast ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003), pp.281– 287. 22.L.Copeland,TheMiddleandUpperPalaeolithicofLebanonandSyriainthelightof recentresearch,in ProblemsinPrehistory:NorthAfricanandtheLevant ,F.Wendorf, A.E.Marks,Eds.(SouthernMethodistUniv.Press,1975),pp.317 – 350. 23.A.Belfer-Cohen,A.N.Goring-Morris,TheUpperPalaeolithicinCisjordan,in Quaternary oftheLevant:Environments,ClimateChange,andHumans ,Y.Enzel,O.Bar-Yosef,Eds. (CambridgeUniv.Press,2017),pp.627 – 638. 24.O.Bar-Yosef,A.Belfer-Cohen,TheLevantineUpperPalaeolithicandEpipalaeolithic, in South-EasternMediterraneanPeoplesBetween130,000and10,000YearsAgo , E.A.A.Garcea,Ed.(OxbowBooks,2010),pp.144 – 167. 25.S.Kadowaki,T.Omori,Y.Nishiaki,VariabilityinEarlyAhmarianlithictechnologyandits implicationsforthemodelofaLevantineoriginoftheProtoaurignacian. J.Hum.Evol. 82,67 – 87(2015). SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 7of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 8

26.S.L.Kuhn,Questionsofcomplexityandscaleinexplanationsforculturaltransitionsin thePleistocene:AcasestudyfromtheEarlyUpperPaleolithic. J.Archaeol.Method Theory 20 ,194 – 211(2013). 27.A.E.Marks,TheupperandmiddlepalaeolithicoftheNearEastandtheNileValley: Theproblemofculturaltransformations,in TheEmergenceofModernHumans : AnArchaeologicalPerspective ,P.Mellars,Ed.(CornellUniv.Press,1990),pp.56 – 80. 28.M.Yizhaq,G.Mintz,I.Cohen,H.Khalaily,S.Weiner,E.Boaretto,Qualitycontrolled radiocarbondatingofbonesandcharcoalfromtheearlyPre-PotteryNeolithicB(PPNB) ofMotza(Israel). Radiocarbon 47 ,193 – 206(2005). 29.D.Alon,G.Mintz,I.Cohen,S.Weiner,E.Boaretto.TheuseofRamanspectroscopyto monitortheremovalofhumicsubstancesfromcharcoal:Qualitycontrolfor14Cdating ofcharcoal. Radiocarbon 44 ,1 – 11(2002). 30.N.R.Rebollo,I.Cohen-Ofri,R.Popovitz-Biro,O.Bar-Yosef,L.Meignen,P.Goldberg, S.Weiner,E.Boaretto,Structuralcharacterizationofcharcoalexposedtohighand lowPh:Implicationsfor14Csamplepreparationandcharcoalpreservation. Radiocarbon 50 ,289 – 307(2008). 31.F.S.Busschers,F.P.Wesselingh,R.H.Kars,M.Versluijs-Helder,J.Wallinga,J.H.A.Bosch, J.Timmner,K.G.J.Nierop,T.Meijer,F.P.M. Bunnik,H.DeWolf,RadiocarbondatingofLate PleistocenemarineshellsfromtheSouthernNorthSea. Radiocarbon 56,1151 – 1166(2014). 32.T.Higham,EuropeanMiddleandUpperPalaeolithicradiocarbondatesareoften olderthantheylook:Problemswithpreviousdatesandsomeremedies. Antiquity 85 , 235 – 249(2011). 33.R.Wood,Fromrevolutiontoconvention:Thepast,presentandfutureofradiocarbon dating. J.Archaeol.Sci. 56 ,61 – 72(2015). 34.C.BronkRamsey,Radiocarbondating:Revolutionsinunderstanding. Archaeometry 50 , 249 – 275(2008). 35.O.Bar-Yosef,A.Belfer-Cohen,FollowingPleistoceneroadsignsofhumandispersals acrossEurasia. Quat.Int. 285 ,30 – 43(2013). 36.G.B.Tostevin, SeeingLithics:AMiddle-RangeTheoryforTestingforCulturalTransmissioninthe Pleistocene(AmericanSchoolofPrehistoricResearchMonograph) (OxbowBooks,2013). 37.D.A.E.Garrod,TherelationsbetweenSouthwestAsiaandEuropeintheLater PalaeolithicAge. J.WorldHist. 1 ,13 – 38(1953). 38.A.Belfer-Cohen,O.Bar-Yosef,Thelevan tineaurignacian:60yearsofresearch,in DorothyGarrod andtheProgressofthePalaeolithic:StudiesinthePrehistoricArchaeologyoftheNear EastandEurope ,W.Davies,R.Charles,Eds.(OxbowBooks,1999),pp.118 – 134. 39.A.Belfer-Cohen,A.N.Goring-Morris,TheearlierUpperPalaeolithic:Aviewfromthe SouthernLevant,in TheAurignacianofYaftehCaveanditsContext(2005 – 2008 Excavations) ,M.Otte,S.Shidrang,D.Flas,Eds.(ERAUL,2012),pp.127 – 136. 40.J.K.Williams,C.A.Bergman,UpperPaleolithiclevelsXIII-VI(AandB)fromthe 1937-1938and1947-1948BostoncollegeexcavationsandtheLevantineAurignacian atKsarAkil,Lebanon. Palorient 36 ,117 – 161(2010). 41.J.J.Shea, StoneToolsinthePaleolithicandNeolithicNearEast:AGuide (CambridgeUniv. Press,2013). 42.A.Belfer-Cohen,O.Bar-Yosef,TheAurignacianatHayonimCave. Palorient 7 ,19 – 42(1981). 43.A.Belfer-Cohen,A.N.Goring-Morris,Ontherebound — ALevantineviewofUpper Palaeolithicdynamics,in ModesdeContactsetdeDplacementsauPalolithique Eurasiatique ,M.Otte,F.LeBrun-Ricalens,Eds.(ERAUL,2014),pp.27 – 38. 44.J.-G.Bordes,NewsfromtheWest:AreevaluationoftheclassicalAurignaciansequence ofthePrigord,in TowardsaDefinitionoftheAurignacian:ProceedingsoftheSymposium HeldinLisbon,Portugal,June25-30,2002 ,O.Bar-Yosef,J.Zilho,Eds.(InstitutoPortugus de Arqueologia,2006),pp.147 – 172. 45.F.Bon, L ’ AurignacienentreMeretOcan:Rflexionsurl‘ unitdesphasesanciennesde l’ AurignaciendanslesuddelaFrance (SocitPrhistoriqueFranaise,2002). 46.F.Bon,N.Teyssandier,J.-G.Bordes,in LesAurignaciens(CivilisationsetCultures) , M.Otte,Ed.(Errance,2010),pp.49 – 72. 47.J.-M.Tejero,R.Yeshurun,O.Barzilai,M.Goder-Goldberger,I.Hershkovitz,R.Lavi, N.Schneller-Pels,O.Marder,TheosseousindustryfromManotCave(WesternGalilee, Israel):Technicalandconceptualbehavioursofboneandantlerexploitationinthe LevantineAurignacian. Quat.Int. 403 ,90 – 106(2016). 48.R.E.Wood,A.Arrizabalaga,M.Camps,S.Fallon,M.-J.Iriarte-Chiapusso,R.Jones, J.Maroto,M.delaRasilla,D.Santamara,J.Soler,N.Soler,A.Villaluenga,T.F.G.Higham, ThechronologyoftheearliestUpperPalaeolithicinnorthernIberia:Newinsights fromL ’ Arbreda,LabekoKobaandLaVia. J.Hum.Evol. 69 ,91 – 109(2014). 49.P.R.Nigst,P.Haesaerts,F.Damblon,C.Frank-Fellner,C.Mallol,B.Viola,M.Gtzinger, L.Niven,G.Trnka,J.-J.Hublin,EarlymodernhumansettlementofEuropenorth oftheAlpsoccurred43,500yearsagoinacoldsteppe-typeenvironment. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 111 ,14394 – 14399(2014). 50.N.Teyssandier,F.Bon,J.-G.Bordes,Withinprojectilerange:Somethoughtsonthe appearanceoftheAurignacianinEurope. J.Anthropol.Res. 66 ,209 – 229(2010). 51.J.Riel-Salvatore,thesis,ArizonaStateUniversity(2007). 52.E.Boaretto,X.Wu,J.Yuan,O.Bar-Yosef,V.Chu,Y.Pan,K.Liu,D.Cohen,T.Jiao,S.Li, H.Gu,P.Goldberg,S.Weiner,Radiocarbondatingofcharcoalandbonecollagen associatedwithearlypotteryatYuchanyanCave,HunanProvince,China. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 106 ,9595 – 9600(2009). 53.L.Regev,E.M.Wild,W.Kutschera,E.Boaretto,D-REAMS:AnewcompactAMSsystem forradiocarbonmeasurementsattheWeizmannInstituteofScience,Rehovot,Israel. Radiocarbon 59 ,775 – 784(2017). 54.P.Bullock, HandbookforSoilThinSectionDescription (WaineResearchPublications,1985). 55.G.Stoops, GuidelinesforAnalysisandDescriptionofSoilandRegolithThinSections (SoilScienceSocietyofAmerica,2003). 56.S.Weiner, Microarchaeology:BeyondtheVisibleArchaeologicalRecord (CambridgeUniv. Press,2010). 57.M.Toffolo,A.M.Maeir,J.R.Chadwick,E.Boaretto,Characterizationofcontextsfor radiocarbondating:ResultsfromtheEarlyIronAgeatTellEs-Safi/Gath,Israel. Radiocarbon 54 ,371 – 390(2012). 58.F.Berna,A.Behar,R.Shahack-Gross,J.Berg,E.Boaretto,A.Gilboa,I.Sharon,S.Shalev, S.Shilstein,N.Yahalom-Mack,J.R.Zorn,S.Weiner,Sedimentsexposedtohigh temperatures:ReconstructingpyrotechnologicalprocessesinLateBronzeandIronAge StrataatTelDor(Israel). J.Archaeol.Sci. 34 ,358 – 373(2007). 59.C.BronkRamsey,Bayesiananalysisofradiocarbondates. Radiocarbon 51,337– 360(2009). 60.P.J.Reimer,E.Bard,A.Bayliss,J.WarrenBeck,P.G.Blackwell,C.BronkRamsey, C.E.Buck,H.Cheng,R.LawrenceEdwards,M.Friedrich,P.M.Grootes,T.P.Guilderson, H. Haflidason,I.Hajdas,C.Hatt,T.J.Heaton,D.L.Hoffmann,A.G.Hogg,K.A.Hughen, K.FelixKaiser,B.Kromer,S.W.Manning,M.Niu,R.W.Reimer,D.A.Richards, E.MarianScott,J.R.Southon,R.A.Staff,C.S.M.Turney,J.vanderPlicht,IntCal13and Marine13radiocarbonagecalibrationcurves0 – 50,000yearscalBP. Radiocarbon 55 , 1869 – 1887(2013). 61.P.Mellars,J.Tixier,Radiocarbon-acceleratordatingofKsar ‘ Aqil(Lebanon)andthe chronologyoftheUpperPalaeolithicsequenceintheMiddleEast. Antiquity 63 , 761 – 768(1989). 62.A.Belfer-Cohen,A.N.Goring-Morris,CurrentissuesinLevantineUpperPalaeolithic research,in MoreThanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPaleolithicDiversityintheNear East ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003),pp.1 – 12. 63.L.Meignen,LevantineperspectivesontheMiddletoUpperPaleolithic “ transition. ” Archaeol.Ethnol.Anthropol.Eurasia 40 ,12 – 21(2012). 64.A.E.Marks,ReflectionsonLevantineUpperPalaeolithicstudies:Pastandpresent,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPalaeolithicDiversityintheNearEast , N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003),pp.249 – 264. 65.M.H.Newcomer,StudyandreplicationofbonetoolsfromKsarAkil(Lebanon). WorldArchaeol. 6 ,138 – 153(1974). 66.I.Azoury, KsarAkil,Lebanon:ATechnologicalandTypologicalAnalysisoftheTransitional andEarlyUpperPaleolithiclevelsatKsarAkilandAbuHalka (BritishArchaeological Reports,1986),vol.289. 67.K.Ohnuma, KsarAkil,Lebanon:ATechnologicalAnalysisoftheEarlierPaleolithicLevelsof KsarAkil.VolumeIII:LevelsXXV-XIV (BritishArchaeologicalReports,1988),vol.3. 68.O.Bar-Yosef,M.Arnold,N.Mercier,A.Belfer-Cohen,P.Goldberg,R.A.Housley,H.Laville, L.Meignen,J.C.Vogel,B.Vandermeersch,ThedatingoftheUpperPaleolithiclayers inKebaraCave,Mt.Carmel. J.Archaeol.Sci. 23 ,297 – 306(1996). 69.K.Monigal,Technology,economyandmobilityatthebeginningoftheLevantineUpper Palaeolithic,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPalaeolithicDiversityinthe NearEast ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003),pp.118 – 133. 70.N.Goring-Morris,A.Davidzon,Straighttothepoint:UpperPaleolithicAhmarianlithic technologyintheLevant. Anthropologie 44 ,93 – 111(2006). 71.J.L.Phillips,TheUpperPaleolithicoftheWadiFeiran,SouthernSinai. Palorient 14 , 183 – 200(1988). 72.I.Gilead,O.Bar-Yosef,EarlyUpperPaleolithicsitesintheQadeshBarneaarea,NESinai. J.FieldArchaeol. 20 ,265 – 280(1993). 73.O.Bar-Yosef,J.L.Phillips, PrehistoricInvestigationsintheGebelMaghara,NorthernSinai (InstituteofArchaeology,HebrewUniv.ofJerusalem,1977),vol.7. 74.I.Gilead,UpperPalaeolithicoccurrencesinSinaiandthetransitiontotheEpi-palaeolithic intheSouthernLevant. Palorient 9 ,39 – 53(1983). 7 5.J.R.Fox,TheTorSadaflithicassemblages:AtechnologicalstudyoftheEarlyUpperPalaeolithic intheWadial-Hasa,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPalaeolithicDiversityinthe NearEast ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003),pp.80 – 94. 76.C.B.Stringer,C.A.Bergman,Fiftyyearsafter:Egbert,anearlyUpperPalaeolithicjuvenile fromKsarAkil,Lebanon. Palorient 15 ,99 – 111(1989). 77.J.Williams,AnexaminationofUpperPalaeolithicflaketechnologiesinthemarginalzoneof theLevant,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpperPalaeolithicDiversityintheNear East ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(OxbowBooks,2003),pp.196 – 208. 78.O.Bar-Yosef,A.Belfer-Cohen,AnotherlookattheLevantineAurignacian,in TheUpper Paleolithic:Colloquia,XIIIInternationalCongressofPrehistoricandProtohistoricSciences, A.Montet-White,A.PalmadiCesnola,K.Valoch,Eds.(Abaco,1996),pp.139 – 150. 79.R.Shimelmitz,D.E.Friesem,J.L.Clark,I.Groma n-Yaroslavski,L.Weissbrod,N.Porat,A.W.Kandel, TheUpperPaleolithicandEpipaleolithicofSefunimCave,Israel. Quat.Int. 1 – 20(2017). SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 8of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 9

80.A.E.Marks,TheMiddletoUpperPaleolithictransitionintheLevant. Adv.World Archaeol. 2 ,51 – 98(1983). 81.A.E.Marks,Ed. PrehistoryandPaleoenvironmentsintheCentralNegev,Israel.Vol1: TheAvdat/AqevArea,Part1 (SouthernMethodistUniv.Press,1976). 82.A.Belfer-Cohen,L.Grosman,Toolsorcores?Andwhydoesitmatter:Carinatedartifacts inLevantineLateUpperPalaeolithicassemblages,in ToolsversusCores:Alternative ApproachestoStoneToolAnalysis ,S.P.McPherron,Ed.(CambridgeScholarsPublishing, 2007),pp.143 – 163. 83.M.Ofer,B.Alex,A.Ayalon,M.Bar-Matthews,G.Bar-Oz,D.Bar,Y.Mayer,F.Berna, E.Boaretto,V.Caracuta,A.Frumkin,M.Goder-Goldberger,I.Hershkovitz,B.Latimer, R.Lavi,A.Matthews,S.Weiner,U.Weiss,G.Yas ‘ ur,O.Barzilai,TheUpperPalaeolithicof ManotCave,WesternGalilee,Israel:The2011 – 12excavations. Antiquity 87 (2013). 84.O.Barzilai,I.Hershkovitz,O.Marder,A.Ayalon,M.Bar-Mathews,G.Bar-Oz,E.Boaretto, F.Berna,A.Frumkin,H.Khalaily,S.Weiner,R.Yeshurun, “ ManotCave,preliminary report, ” HadashotArkheologiyot (2012);www.hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng. asp?id=2183&mag_id=119. 85.O.Barzilai,O.Marder,I.Hershkovitz, “ ManotCave,Seasons2011 – 2012,preliminary report, ” HadashotArkheologiyot (2014);www.hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_eng. aspx?print=all&id=6470&mag_id=121. 86.R.Yeshurun,J.-M.Tejero,O.Barzilai,I.Hershkovitz,O.Marder,UpperPalaeolithicbone retouchersfromManotCave(Israel):Apreliminaryanalysisofa(yet)rarephenomenon intheLevant,in TheOriginsofBoneToolTechnologies ,J.H.Hutson,S.GaudzinskiWindheuser,Eds.(Rmish-GermanischesZentralmuseums,2017),pp.1 – 9. 87.A.L.Kuhn,A.Belfer-Cohen,O.Barzilai,M.C.Stiner,K.W.Kerry,N.Munro,D.B.-Y.Mayer, ThelastglacialmaximumatMegedRockshelter,UpperGalilee,Israel. J.Israel Prehist.Soc. 34 ,5 – 47(2004). 88.A.Belfer-Cohen,A.Davidzon,A.N.Goring-Morris,D.Lieberman,M.Spiers,NahalEinGevI: ALateUpperPalaeolithicsitebytheseaofGalilee,Israel. Palorient 30,25 – 45(2004). 89.C.A.Bergman, KsarAkil,Lebanon:ATechnologicalandTypologicalAnalysisoftheLater PaleolithicLevelsofKsarAkil.VolumeII:LevelsXIII-VI (BritishArchaeologicalReports,1987). 90.M.Vanhaeren,F.d ’ Errico,Aurignacianethno-linguisticgeographyofEuroperevealed bypersonalornaments. J.Archaeol.Sci. 33 ,1105 – 1128(2006). 91.R.White,SystemsofpersonalornamentationintheEarlyUpperPalaeolithic: Methodologicalchallengesandnewobservations,in RethinkingtheHumanRevolution: NewBehaviouralandBiologicalPerspectivesontheOriginandDispersalofModern Humans ,P.Mellars,K.Boyle,O.Bar-Yosef,C.Stringer,Eds.(McDonaldInstitutefor ArchaeologicalResearch,2007),pp.287 – 302. 92.G.Lengyel, UpperPalaeolithicandEpipalaeolithicLithicTechnologiesatRaqefetCave, MountCarmelEast,Israel (BritishArchaeologicalReports,2007). 93.O.Bar-Yosef,A.Belfer-Cohen,TheQafzehUpperPalaeolithicassemblages:70yearslate. EurasianPrehist. 2 ,145 – 180(2004). 94.L.Regev,K.M.Poduska,L.Addadi,S.Weiner,E.Boaretto,Distinguishingbetween calcitesformedbydifferentmechanismsusinginfraredspectrometry:Archaeological applications. J.Archaeol.Sci. 37 ,3022 – 3029(2010). 95.K.Douka,T.Higham,A.Sinitsyn,Theinfluenceofpretreatmentchemistryonthe radiocarbondatingofCampanianIgnimbrite-agedcharcoalfromKostenki14(Russia). Quat.Res. 73 ,583 – 587(2010). 96.J.S.Pigati,J.Quade,J.Wilson,A.J.T.Jull,N.A.Lifton,Developmentoflow-background vacuumextractionandgraphitizationsystemsfor14Cdatingofold(40 – 60ka)samples. Quat.Int. 166 ,4 – 14(2007). 97.M.I.Bird,L.K.Ayliffe,L.K.Fifield,C.S.M.Turney,R.G.Cresswell,T.T.Barrows,B.David, Radiocarbondatingof “ old ” charcoalusingawetoxidation,stepped-combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41 ,127 – 140(1999). 98.I.Cohen-Ofri,L.Weiner,E.Boaretto,G.Mintz,S.Weiner,Modernandfossilcharcoal: Aspectsofstructureanddiagenesis. J.Archaeol.Sci. 33 ,428 – 439(2006). 99.F.Braadbaart,I.Poole,Morphological,chemicalandphysicalchangesduring charcoalificationofwoodanditsrelevancetoarchaeologicalcontexts. J.Archaeol. Sci. 35 ,2434 – 2445(2008). 100.C.BronkRamsey,Dealingwithoutliersandoffsetsinradiocarbondating. Radiocarbon 51 ,1023 – 1045(2009). 101.K.Douka,T.F.G.Higham,C.A.Bergman,Statisticalandarchaeologicalerrorsinvalidate theproposedchronologyforthesiteofKsarAkil. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.112 ,E7034(2015). 102.P.J.Reimer,F.G.McCormac,Marineradiocarbonreservoircorrectionsforthe MediterraneanandAegeanSeas. Radiocarbon 44 ,159 – 166(2002). 103.P.J.Reimer,M.G.L.Baillie,E.Bard,A.Bayliss,J.W.Beck,P.G.Blackwell,C.BronkRamsey, C.E.Buck,G.S.Burr,R.L.Edwards,M.Friedrich,P.M.Grootes,T.P.Guilderson,I.Hajdas, T.J.Heaton,A.G.Hogg,K.A.Hughen,K.F.Kaiser,B.Kromer,F.G.McCormac, S.W.Manning,R.W.Reimer,D.A.Richards,J.R.Southon,S.Talamo,C.S.M.Turney, J.vanderPlicht,C.E.Weyhenmeyer,IntCal09andMarine09radiocarbonagecalibration curves,0 – 50,000yearscalBP. Radiocarbon 51 ,1111 – 1150(2009). 104.S.L.Kuhn,FrominitialUpperPaleolithictoAhmarianatagizlicave,Turkey. Anthropologie 42 ,249 – 262(2004). 105.S.L.Kuhn,M.C.Stiner,K.W.Kerry,E.Gle,TheearlyUpperPaleolithicata zl Cave (Hatay,Turkey):Preliminaryresults,in MorethanMeetstheEye:StudiesonUpper PalaeolithicDiversityintheNearEast ,A.N.Goring-Morris,A.Belfer-Cohen,Eds.(Oxbow Books,2003),pp.106 – 117. 106.J.F.Ewing,PreliminarynoteontheexcavationsatthePalaeolithicsiteofKsr ‘ Akil, RepublicofLebanon. Antiquity 21 ,186 – 196(1947). 107.J.Tixier,FouilleKsar ‘ Aqil,Liban(1969 – 1974). Palorient 2 ,183 – 185(1974). 108.A.E.Marks,P.Volkman,TheMousterianofKsarAkil:LevelsXXVIAthroughXXVIIIB. Palorient 12 ,5 – 20 (1986). 109.C.A.Bergman,KsarAkilandtheUpperPalaeolithicoftheLevant. Palorient 14,201– 210(1988). 110.J.F.Ewing,AprobableneanderthaloidfromKsar ‘ Akil,Lebanon. Am.J.Phys.Anthropol. 21 ,101 – 104(1963). 111.M.D.Bosch,M.A.Mannino,A.L.Prendergast,T.C.O ’ Connell,B.Demarchi,S.M.Taylor, L.Niven,J.vanderPlicht,J.-J.Hublin,ReplytoDoukaetal.:CriticalevaluationoftheKsr ‘ Akilchronologies. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 112 ,E7035(2015). 112.O.Bar-Yosef,B.Vandermeersch,B.Arensburg,A.Belfer-Cohen,P.Goldberg,H.Laville, L.Meignen,Y.Rak,J.D.Speth,E.Tchernov,A.-M.Tillier,S.Weiner,G.A.Clark,A.Garrard, D.O.Henry,F.Hole,D.Roe,K.R.Rosenberg,L.A.Schepartz,J.J.Shea,F.H.Smith, E.Trinkaus,N.M.Whalen,L.Wilson,TheexcavationsinKebaraCave,Mt.Carmel[and commentsandreplies]. Curr.Anthropol. 33 ,497 – 550(1992). 113.H.Valladas,J.L.Joron,G.Valladas,B.Arensburg,O.Bar-Yosef,A.Belfer-Cohen,P.Goldberg, H.Laville,L.Meignen,Y.Rak,E.Tchernov,A.M.Tillier,B.Vandermeersch,Thermoluminescence datesfortheNeanderthalburialsiteatKebarainIsrael. Nature 330,159 – 160(1987). 114.S.L.Kuhn,N.Zwyns,RethinkingtheinitialUpperPaleolithic. Quat.Int. 347,29 – 38(2014). 115.A.J.Stutz,L.Nilsson-Stutz,T.Arpin,J.L.Clark,J.Rech,J.Robinson,Mughrel-Hamamah. Am.J.Archaeol. 116 ,697 – 699(2012). 116.B.Weninger,O.Jris,A14Cagecalibrationcurveforthelast60ka:TheGreenland-Hulu U/ThtimescaleanditsimpactonunderstandingtheMiddletoUpperPaleolithic transitioninWesternEurasia. J.Hum.Evol. 55 ,772 – 781(2008). Acknowledgments: WethankS.WeinerandM.Thibodeauforthemicroarcheologywork; C.Klcker,J.Kakayuk,andP.Sathyanarayanforcarryingoutthesedimentheatingexperiment; andthreeanonymousreviewersaswellasD.Pilbeam,O.Bar-Yosef,andC.Tryonfortheir commentsonthispaper. Funding: AnalyticalworkwasfundedbyNSFDoctoralDissertation ImprovementGrant(1334615),FulbrightStudentScholarshipfromtheU.S.-IsraelEducational Foundation,andNSFGraduateResearchFellowshipProgramAward(DGE-1144152)toB.A. RadiocarbondateswerefundedbytheExilarch ’ sFoundation,D-REAMS,andtheMaxPlanckWeizmannCenterforIntegrativeArchaeologyandAnthropologyawardstoE.B.Paleobotanical analysiswassupportedbytheMinistryofScience,TechnologyandSpace,Israel,andthe MinistryofForeignAffairsandInternationalCooperationGeneralDirectorateforPoliticalAffairs &Security,ItalianRepublic(IMOS3-13329)awardstoE.B.andV.C.ManotCaveexcavationis fundedbytheDanDavidFoundation,theIsraelA ntiquitiesAuthority,CaseWesternReserve University,theLeakeyFoundation,theIreneLeviSalaCAREArchaeologicalFoundation,the KerenKayemetL ’ Israel,andtheBinationalScienceFoundation(2015303)toI.H.,B.L.,O.B.,and O.M.andbythetheIsraelScienceFoundation(338/14)toI.H.,O.M.,andO.B.Geoarcheological workwassupportedbyawardstoF.B.fromtheSocialSciencesandHumanitiesResearch CouncilofCanada(awardno.430-2013-000546)andtheBerthaandLouisWeinsteinResearch Fund,andresearchwassupportedbytheKimmelCenterforArchaeologicalScience. Author contributions: B.A.andE.B.designedtheradiocarbonsamplecollection,characterization, anddatingprotocols.B.A.,O.B.,O.M.,andE.B.designedthepaper.B.A.andE.B.wrote themanuscriptwithcontributionsfromO.M.,O.B.,T.A.,L.D.,F.B.,andM.G.-G.,andallco-authors assistedinrevisions.B.A.andO.M.conductedtheregionalreview.O.B.,I.H.,andO.M. directedtheManotCaveresearchproject.E.B.directedtheradiocarbondatinglaboratory. F.B.andB.A.conductedthegeoarcheologicalwork.V.C.conductedtheanthracologicalanalysis. O.B.,O.M.,T.A.,andL.D.analyzedthelithicartifacts.M.G.-G.andR.L.ledtheexcavationand stratigraphicinterpretationsofareasCandE,respectively.B.A.,E.B.,E.M.,andL.R.performedthe radiocarbonanalyses.D.B.-Y.M.,J.-M.T.,andR.Y.studiedthefaunalremainsandartifacts.A.A., M.B.-M.,andG.Y.performedtheU-Thdating.A.F.conductedthegeologicalstudyofthecave. I.H.,B.L.,andM.G.H.studiedthehumanremains. Competinginterests: Theauthorsdeclare thattheyhavenocompetinginterests. Dataandmaterialsavailability: Alldataneededto evaluatetheconclusionsinthepaperarepresentinthepaperand/ortheSupplementary Materials.Additionaldatarelatedtothispapermayberequestedfromtheauthors. Submitted11May2017 Accepted23October2017 Published15November2017 10.1126/sciadv.1701450 Citation: B.Alex,O.Barzilai,I.Hershkovitz,O.Marder,F.Berna,V.Caracuta,T.Abulafia,L.Davis, M.Goder-Goldberger,R.Lavi,E.Mintz,L.Regev,D.Bar-YosefMayer,J.-M.Tejero,R.Yeshurun, A.Ayalon,M.Bar-Matthews,G.Yasur,A.Frumkin,B.Latimer,M.G.Hans,E.Boaretto,Radiocarbon chronologyofManotCave,IsraelandUpperPaleolithicdispersals. Sci.Adv. 3 ,e1701450(2017). SCIENCEADVANCES | RESEARCHARTICLEAlex etal ., Sci.Adv. 2017; 3 :e170145015November2017 9of9 on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

PAGE 10

Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals Yeshurun, Avner Ayalon, Mira Bar-Matthews, Gal Yasur, Amos Frumkin, Bruce Latimer, Mark G. Hans and Elisabetta Boaretto Davis, Mae Goder-Goldberger, Ron Lavi, Eugenia Mintz, Lior Regev, Daniella Bar-Yosef Mayer, Jos-Miguel Tejero, Reuven Bridget Alex, Omry Barzilai, Israel Hershkovitz, Ofer Marder, Francesco Berna, Valentina Caracuta, Talia Abulafia, Lauren DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1701450 (11), e1701450. 3 Sci Adv ARTICLE TOOLS http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/e1701450 MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2017/11/13/3.11.e1701450.DC1 REFERENCES http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/e1701450#BIBL This article cites 74 articles, 5 of which you can access for free PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions Terms of Service Use of this article is subject to the registered trademark of AAAS. is a Science Advances Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. The title York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American (ISSN 2375-2548) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New Science Advances on September 18, 2019 http://advances.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from


printinsert_linkshareget_appmore_horiz

Download Options

close

Download PDF

temp: no images or image is ohp thumbnail.


Cite this item close

APA

Cras ut cursus ante, a fringilla nunc. Mauris lorem nunc, cursus sit amet enim ac, vehicula vestibulum mi. Mauris viverra nisl vel enim faucibus porta. Praesent sit amet ornare diam, non finibus nulla.

MLA

Cras efficitur magna et sapien varius, luctus ullamcorper dolor convallis. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Fusce sit amet justo ut erat laoreet congue sed a ante.

CHICAGO

Phasellus ornare in augue eu imperdiet. Donec malesuada sapien ante, at vehicula orci tempor molestie. Proin vitae urna elit. Pellentesque vitae nisi et diam euismod malesuada aliquet non erat.

WIKIPEDIA

Nunc fringilla dolor ut dictum placerat. Proin ac neque rutrum, consectetur ligula id, laoreet ligula. Nulla lorem massa, consectetur vitae consequat in, lobortis at dolor. Nunc sed leo odio.